between a man and a woman. It is essentially valued by the Filipinos as they normally follow
different norms and traditions. However, the process of getting married in this country may not be
as simple as how some couples perceive it. As jurisprudence dictates, “Marriage is a lifetime
institution is the foundation of the family;” as such, it “shall be protected by the State.” In more
explicit terms, the Family Code characterizes it as “a special contract of permanent union between
a man and a woman entered into in accordance with law for the establishment of conjugal and
family life.” So crucial are marriage and the family to the stability and peace of the nation that
their “nature, consequences, and incidents are governed by law and not subject to stipulation.”
As a matter of policy, therefore, the absolute divorce of a marriage for the purpose of
contracting another cannot be accomplished merely on the basis of the perception of both parties
or of one that their union is so defective with respect to the essential requisites of a contract of
marriage as to render it void ipso jure and with no legal effect – and nothing more. Were this so,
this inviolable social institution would be reduced to a mockery and would rest on very shaky
foundations indeed. And the grounds for nullifying marriage would be as diverse and far-ranging
as human ingenuity and fancy could conceive. For such a socially significant institution, and
official state pronouncement through the courts, and nothing less, will satisfy the exacting norms
of society. Not only would such an open and public declaration by the courts definitively confirm
1
Santos vs. CA, 240 SCRA 20.
the nullity of the contract of marriage, but the same would be easily verifiable through records
accessible to everyone. The New Civil Code of the Philippines repealed divorce and the Family
Code of 1988 does not also provide for divorce in the Philippines.
basic social institution. Our family law is based on the policy that marriage is not a mere contract,
but a social institution in which the State is vitally interested. The State can find no stronger anchor
than on good, solid and happy families. The break-up of families weakens our social and moral
fabric and, hence, their preservation is not the concern alone of the family members (Tuazon vs.
CA, 256 SCRA 160; Republic vs. Cuison-Melgar, 486 SCRA 177).2
2
Ernesto L. Pineda, “The Family Code of the Philippines (Annotated),” 2011, Central Book Supply, Inc., Quezon City,
pp. 3-4.