Search 80 million documents Upload EN

0 0 RELATED TITLES
Home 26 views

20 People vs Pancho
Saved
Nuguid
Uploaded by Vince Llamazares
Bestsellers Lupango on Feb 14, 2017

Crim Pro Digest Full description Dizon-Pamintuan 4 People vs PP vs. Es

Books
vs. People Ancheta.pdf

Audiobooks Save Embed Share Print

Magazines Download Search document

Documents

Sheet Music
People vs Pancho Ponente: Perez, J

G.R. No. 206910 Plaintif: People o6 the

Philippines vs

October 14, 201@ !cc"se#: $"liet Pancho

%acts:

&e'bers o6 the (ri'inal )nvesti*ation an# intelli*ence +"rea" o6 (eb" (itL con#"cte# a
search in the ho"se o6 acc"se#-appellant an# her h"sban# Na'"el Pancho locate# in Nistio
Plasti/an, +aran*aL P"lQo-%ati'a, (eb" (itL. Police N"perinten#ent Pablo Rabra serve# the
search 3arrant on acc"se# appellant. Therea6ter PO1 5eloso, #esi*nate# as the searcher,
PO1 )la*an, #esi*nate# as the recor#er an# three baran*aL tano#s, as 3itnesses procee#e#
3ith the search. The search Liel#e# three bi* plastic pac/ets o6 s"specte# shab" 3ei*hin* a
total o6 14.49 *ra's, 3hich 3ere recovere# "n#er a Qe3elrL boV place# on top o6 a cabinet
#ivi#er. PO1 5elasco han#e# the pac/ets o6 shab" to PO2 )la*an 3ho recor#e# the' in the
con7scation receipt an# 'a#e 'ar/in*s on the plastic pac/ets. PO1 5eloso acco'panie#
PO2 )la*an in han#in* over the sei8e# articles an# the letter reY"est to the Philippine
National Police (ri'e RaboratorL. The PNP (ri'e Rab later iss"e# (he'istrL Report No. P-
1Z;1-200@ con7r'in* that the three heat seale# transparent plastic ba*s, 3ei*hin* a total
o6 14.49 *ra's, 3ere teste# positive 6or the presence o6 'etha'pheta'ine hL#rochlori#e.

On Nepte'ber 22, 200@ an in6or'ation 3as 7le# a*ainst the acc"se# 6or possession o6
ille*al #r"*s <Nection 11, !rticle )) o6 R! No. 916@. !6ter the prosec"tion an# the #e6ense
presente# their respective evi#ences, the Trial (o"rt convicte# the acc"se# 6or the cri'e
char*e#. ! notice o6 appeal 3as sent to the (o"rt o6 !ppeals, 3hich later on a=r'e# the
#ecision o6 the Trial (o"rt 3ith sli*ht 'o#i7cation 3ith respect to the 7ne <re#"ce# to
P@00,000>.
This document is...
On appeal, the acc"se# ar*"e# the inconsistencies 3ith respect to the testi'onies o6 the
Read books, audiobooks,
One o6 theand more
prosec"tion 3itnesses. o=cers Useful Not useful
3ho con#"cte# the search testi7e# that theL 7rst
Scribd the secon# ?oor o6 the ho"se, 3hile the other o=cer testi7e# that theL 7rst
searche#
searche# the
View
½ 7rst ?oor o6 the ho"se. The acc"se# 6"rther ar*"e# that the baran*aL tano#s
GET —
sho"l# On been
have the App Store
'a#e to testi6L to corroborate the testi'onies o6 the police o=cers
relative to the search, %"rther'ore the reY"isites "n#er section 21, para*raph 1, !rticle 21
o6 R! no. 916@ 3ere not co'plie# 3ith. RastlL, 6or 6ailin* to i''e#iatelL s"rren#er the
sei8e# ite's be6ore the (o"rt 3ho iss"e# the search 3arrant p"rs"ant to Nection 12 o6 R"le
126 o6 the R"les o6 (o"rt.

)ss"e: @hether or not the acc"se#-appellantAs *"ilt has been proven beLon# reasonable
#o"bt

Bel#: Ces, the ar*"'ents o6 the acc"se# lac/s 'erit. @ith respect to the 7rst assi*n'ent o6
error, the (o"rt r"le# that s"ch inconsistencies are trivial in nat"re. )n the case o6 5alleno vs
People, the (o"rt en"'erate# the reY"isites in or#er 6or prosec"tion 6or ille*al possession o6
a #an*ero"s #r"* to prosper, to 3it: 1. The acc"se# 3as in possession o6 an ite' or an
obQect i#enti7e# to be a prohibite# #r"*, 2. N"ch possession is not a"thori8e# bL la3, an# Z.
The acc"se# 3as 6reelL an# conscio"slL a3are o6 bein* in possession o6 the #r"*. )n this
case all o6 the ele'ents are present. @hile it is tr"e that the #r"*s 3ere not 6o"n# on
acc"se# appellantAs person, nonetheless the acc"se# 3as #ee'e# to have in constr"ctive
possession o6 the pac/ets o6 shab" beca"se theL 3ere "n#er her control an# 'ana*e'ent.

@ith respect to the secon# assi*n'ent o6 error, 3hile it is tr"e that the above state# la3
reY"ires that s"ch articles sei8e# be 7rst photo*raphe# in the presence o6 the 'e#ia an#
PO$, 3hich 3ere not 6ollo3e# in this case, nonetheless the )'ple'entin* R"les o6 R! 916@
ofers so'e ?eVibilitL in cases o6 Q"sti7able ca"ses in cases o6 nonco'pliance. The onlL
reY"ire'ent is to properlL preserve the inte*ritL o6 the sei8e# ite's 3hich the (o"rt 6o"n#
to be in or#er. RastlL 3ith respect to the last assi*n'ent o6 error, the (o"rt r"le# that the
6ail"re o6 the rai#in* tea' to #eliver the sei8e# ite's to the Q"#*e 3ho iss"e# the 3arrant
beco'es i''aterial beca"se recor#s sho3 that the chain o6 c"sto#L is intact.

Reward Your Curiosity

Everything you want to read.
Anytime. Anywhere. Any device.

Read Free For 30 Days

No Commitment. Cancel anytime.

Share this document

Related Interests

Witness Testimony Prosecutor Search Warrant

Law Enforcement

Documents Similar To 20 People vs Pancho Nuguid

Dizon-Pamintuan vs. 4 People vs PP vs. Estepano G.R. No. 1

People Ancheta.pdf UPLOADED BY UPLOADED
UPLOADED BY UPLOADED BY Aaron Beasley GH IAYA
jon_cpa Timothy Mark Mad…

More From Vince Llamazares Lupango

7. People vs 4. People vs. Gapay 6. de Jesus vs. 8. Navarr

Samontanez UPLOADED BY Sanchez-Malit UPLOADED
UPLOADED BY Vince Llamazares L… UPLOADED BY Vince Ll
Vince Llamazares L… Vince Llamazares L…

ABOUT SUPPORT LEGAL

About Scribd Help / FAQ Terms

Press Accessibility Privacy

Our blog Purchase help Copyright

Join our team! AdChoices

Contact Us Publishers

Invite Friends

Gifts

Copyright © 2019 Scribd Inc. . Browse Books . Site Directory . Site Language: English