Laney Kahle
Mrs. Cramer
Comp Pd. 27
5 Oct. 2018
The Truth Behind Videogames
There is more behind video games than you think. The question, “Are videogames
considered art” is very debatable. People have strong feelings towards each side. It is important
that each side has a reason behind what they believe in. Also, the answer to the question may
change people's thoughts on video games in a good, or bad way. While the topic may be
debatable, there are valid reasons to consider videogames art, reasons that it does not fit that
description, and ideology that there is a difference between art and videogames.
Although there are different thoughts on the topic, people believe that art is a big part of
video games. Throughout time video games have evolved in numerous ways. The concept,
details, and graphics have increased greatly. Games have also gotten to the point where they
control emotions. Game consoles have gone from a little box- like figure to a figure that is
similar to a DVD player. Not only has the console itself changed, but the accessories that the
games come with now our crazy. Players can now communicate to others, or friends through one
little wire. Communication can be spread out through headphones, and a microphone to any
other console around the world. Creators of the system had to lay out designs to create the idea
of a microphoned headset. The main part of art is sketching out before making the final design
therefore, making art and the idea of video games similar. Graphics, along with the consoles
have changed into something great( Tavinor 22). In today's games, players might feel as if they
are in the game themselves. The graphics have gone from looking like animated figures to real
life people. The creators had to draw out the ideas of what the characters in the game would look
Kahle 2
like. True thought and creativity must be put in to make all the characters in the game unique,
and different. Video games also produce emotions to the players just like art does to the viewers.
Art is full of emotions, and ideas. When people view art, they may feel depressed, angry, and
sympathetic. Video games also produce the same emotions in a different way. People playing the
games may get angry when they lose, or full of excitement when they win. Gamers feel
determined to exceed in the game they are playing, which makes them feel good inside. Due to
evolution, and emotions from video games, they are seen to be art (Cruz 1).
However, there is strong evidence to prove that video games do not fit the description of
art. Video games have aspects about them, that push them out of being considered as art. For a
piece of work to be considered art there must be full creativity behind it. Video games do not
have a creative background. Once the game is made, there are few changes made. The creators
have the idea of the game and put the simplest details to make the game run smoothly. Art is
whatever comes to the artist’s mind. They do not care about if it is perfect or not. The viewers
find the art beautiful and appealing no matter what. Games are seen to be goal-directed. The
creators make the games, so the players have something to achieve. They want the players to
thrive for something, and just follow the easy steps to win. While playing the games there are
only a few certain ways to accomplish the task. There is no way that the players can be creative
and think outside of the box to win. The players do the same routine repeatedly every time they
play the game. Art can be viewed in a different way every time it is looked at. Video games are
also seen as an activity while arts seen as a passion. People play games when they have time for
them or when they are bored. Artists’, however, make the time for art and they do not want to do
anything but art. The players cannot control what happens in the game. The game is seen only as
one way to everyone. Art on the other hand is looked at differently by people. True art has
Kahle 3
different meanings and can be looked at however anybody wants to look at it. Overall video
games are not seen as art due to the real meaning of art (Rough 3)
The difference between art and video games is very clear. Art and video games have
multiple differences between them leaving games not to be any part of art. Due to the concept of
art being to transmit emotional complexity and video games is a game played electronically. The
definition of videogames does not clearly state that is a part of art. Video games do not fit the
concept of transmitting emotional complexity. Games are seen to be only fun for the players. On
the other hand, many argue that there is no difference between the two. The reasoning behind
why people see no difference between art and video games is that things like film are seen to be
a part of art. Creating videogames uses the same idea that creating film does. Sketches and
planning need to be laid out before the final product. However, the mindset behind film is
creativity and inspiration. Video games are just based on popularity and grabbing the attention of
young kids. If video games were truly art, the creators would be trying to meet the interest of all
age groups instead of just one. Art is made for everyone to see and take into consideration.
Despite many arguments a difference between art and videogames is seen (Tavinor 23).
In conclusion, the idea of video games being a part of art is very debatable due to
individuals considering it art, and the reasons video games do not fit the description of art, and
that there is a clear difference between the two. In conclusion art is a big part of video games due
to details and graphics. However, video games are seen to have little creativity behind them
pushing games out of the category of art. Between each side of ideas a difference between the
two is visible. Overall there is more behind video games than you think.
Kahle 4
Works Cited
2018.