“If teachers and school leaders are truly committed to leaving no child behind in reading,
then they must actively pursue the goal of reading fluency in elementary and middle school
classrooms” (On Developing Readers 41). I was surprised to learn that fluency tends to be
overused when it comes to labeling students’ reading challenges. Fluency is not a component of
proficient reading; rather, it is the ultimate outcome of proficient reading. Therefore, fluency
interventions are not helpful in many instances. Instead, students should be assessed for their
ability to accurately decode words, their automaticity, and their prosody. In most instances, there
is an underlying issue with one or more of these three areas instead of with the generalized end
goal of fluency. Learning this has made me take pause when trying to identify a student’s
reading challenge. If we don’t get to the root of the issue, are we ever really helping that child
succeed? I cannot expect my students to show growth if I am not accurately addressing their
specific needs.
“The classrooms of the most effective teachers were characterized by high academic
engagement… How we teach phonics has not been demonstrated to have a huge effect on
achievement, but how we orchestrate classrooms has shown that effect” (Best Practices in
Literacy Instruction 193). I count myself as lucky to teach in an environment where I am not
required to use scripted programs. However, the research on the impact of scripted phonics
programs indicated to me that they are not necessarily a bad thing; it’s similar to the idea of
SARAH EDWARDS BAKER’S TOP TEN SYNTHESIS 2
following the letter of the law versus the spirit of the law. Research has shown that students do
need systematic processes when learning phonics, but that the program cannot take the place of a
highly qualified and effective teacher. For me, this research reminds me that I should incorporate
strategies from a program but not rely on it so heavily that I neglect the individual needs of my
“Most important, though, our conversation made the text important to us, gave it a place
in our lives, helped us think about matters that were of significance to us” (Disrupting Thinking
76). As we learned about the research behind teaching comprehension strategies to students, I
guides and gave reading checks. I definitely realized that I needed to turn my instruction into
more of a conversation and less of an assessment. I loved the “Book, Head, Heart, Questions”
strategy in Disrupting Thinking to get students to make deeper connections with what they’ve
summative) is just going to increase his/her anxiety. Throughout this semester, I have started
whole group, small group, or partners). I’ve already seen so much more motivation from my
reluctant readers to want to know what is going to happen next because they’ve made rich
connections to the characters and/or plot of a text! I’m also able to ask guiding questions
throughout our discussions that allow me to see whether or not students are grasping the
SARAH EDWARDS BAKER’S TOP TEN SYNTHESIS 3
material. I’ve noticed overall improvement on assessments because students have been more
“All of us are vocabulary teachers… Our obligation to the students is not just to be
vocabulary teachers but to be the best vocabulary teachers that we can be” (Best Practices 215).
Vocabulary is an area where I thought I had finally figured out how to best serve my eighth grade
language arts students after eight years of trying new strategies nearly every year, but then we
covered the most recent, research-based approaches to vocabulary instruction. Students should
have choice over the words, only certain words should be assessed, words should be referenced
often, and students should have multiple exposures to the words used in different contexts. By
following these strategies, I’m giving my students an opportunity to develop rich vocabularies
and greatly improve their abilities to comprehend complex texts. It’s not just about teaching
vocabulary in isolation, either. While it’s been a challenge for me to narrow lists down and let
students have choice, I’ve been more intentional about using rich language in our class
discussions in order to help them build word consciousness and promote academic language.
“You’re looking for text that is accessible, engaging, and complex: accessible because if
you introduce new, hard thinking work using new, hard texts, kids will struggle on all fronts;
engaging because if students are engaged, they’re willing to work hard; and complex so that if
they do the work, it pays off-- they gain new insights and epiphanies” (On Developing Readers
SARAH EDWARDS BAKER’S TOP TEN SYNTHESIS 4
67). I appreciate that the research behind incorporating complex texts into the classroom
encourages teachers to provide ALL students with access to complex texts-- including struggling
readers. However, teachers must relinquish a bit of control here and let students have choice
over the books they are reading independently. Incorporating complex texts should teach
students strategy without compromising their motivation to read. Therefore, students should be
exposed to high quality complex texts as often as possible with teacher guidance and support,
and then encouraged to read what most interests him/her independently. By evaluating book
choice according to purpose, teachers are exposing students to a variety of texts and making
them more comfortable with applying reading strategies independently. I’m currently doing a
choice book project with my readers who tend to struggle, and their book selections have been
incredibly high quality and complex because the content interests them greatly. They are willing
to apply strategies learned in class because they are motivated to learn more about a particular
theme or subject.
“I believe that the critical thinkers we so desperately need will emerge from classrooms
where teachers have eschewed the coverage approach in favor of fostering deep thinking…” (On
Developing Readers 54). Visual notetaking is all about student interaction with material.
Recently, my students started reading To Kill a Mockingbird. Instead of having them annotate
chapter one, I asked them to create visual notes. We talked through some of the basics of visual
notetaking, and they set off to complete the assignment for homework. When they returned the
next day, our conversation was the most enriching literary discussion we have had all year.
SARAH EDWARDS BAKER’S TOP TEN SYNTHESIS 5
Students were able to justify their sketches through returning to the text for support, they
collaborated to appropriately challenge one another’s ideas, and ultimately they showed that they
had made rich connections to the text. Research shows that teachers foster critical thinking when
students are able to connect deeply with text. Ultimately, visual notetaking is another way to
assess comprehension and increase student engagement. It’s an added benefit that we remember
65% more with visuals! It’s definitely a strategy I will continue to use with my students based on
“We hope that students will develop the habits of looking closely at the text, considering
carefully the impact it has upon them, and reflecting on the obligation all of that thought incurs.
We hope that they will see reading as an opportunity to change, not just as idle amusement or a
chance to collect facts and data” (Disrupting Thinking 153-154). I am incredibly thankful to no
longer work in a school that places emphasis and undue stress on standardized tests. Test-centric
literacy instruction encourages a surface-level approach to reading. Students are required to read
seemingly meaningless passages and answer multiple choice questions. I remember having to do
this often when I taught in public school; we would spend weeks with EOG practice packets.
Students can’t learn about their world through these types of lessons. They often cannot even
relate to the characters or plotlines of these passages. By taking emphasis off of test preparation
and placing value on allowing students to read high quality, complex, and engaging texts as often
as possible, comprehension increases and therefore students are able to apply their skills on tests
as a result. “All students deserve instruction that helps them experience reading comprehension
SARAH EDWARDS BAKER’S TOP TEN SYNTHESIS 6
as a rich and complex practice of constructing, critiquing, and responding to meaning in texts”
(“Dangers of Test Preparation” 1). It had never occurred to me that test-centric literacy
instruction a social justice issue before reading the research, but that understanding now
motivates me to lobby for change in all schools moving forward instead of simply feeling
improve literacy education” (“10 Things” 11). It seems that everything we learned this semester
related back to the importance of understanding the research behind our teaching strategies.
While so many programs and practices advertise themselves as “research proven” or “research
based”, it was enlightening to learn what that these titles are often misused. It was also very
interesting to explore the research behind a program of my choice. If our goal as educators is to
improve literacy education, then we have to be prepared to defend our curriculum choices with
and ask a lot of questions. I learned that so much of the research is relative to an individual
school community, and it cannot often be applied with a “one size fits all” approach. Because I
have a lot of autonomy when it comes to the curriculum decisions at my school, I will be
utilizing my understanding of research to choose strategies that have been tested and proven to
texts and authors, and validating their reading choices, I’ve seen students’ interest and
motivation to read increase” (On Developing Readers 63-64). One of the most rewarding
activities this semester was the WOW books project. This project allowed me to read a multitude
of new texts that I am now able to incorporate into my classroom instruction and recommend to
students. Students saw me reading during planning periods, they asked me about titles I had
chosen, and I even incorporated a few read alouds during class time, which they loved! This
project reinvigorated my love of reading and validated the research related to the connection
between book choice and student motivation. I want to challenge the staggering statistics that
indicate students gradually stop reading as they grow up. I’m going to continue to find, read, and
recommend new, engaging texts that peak the interests of my students in order to help foster
lifelong readers.
“Each instructional context-- read aloud, shared reading, guided reading, and independent
increasingly difficult texts” (Who’s Doing the Work? 1 42-143). After reading Who’s Doing the
Work? I now understand that read aloud, shared reading, and guided reading do not stop once
students leave the fifth grade. My eighth graders read several complex texts throughout the year,
and I was doing them a disservice by assuming that they would be able to appropriately and
accurately grapple with these types of texts independently. Because of the research presented in
my Action Book Club book, I have now started to intentionally incorporate the gradual release of
SARAH EDWARDS BAKER’S TOP TEN SYNTHESIS 8
responsibility within my lesson plans to help students make sense of the new material. Afterall, I
want to develop students who appreciate and can make sense of complex texts. Because of my
intentional implementation of these strategies, my students will leave middle school with a
strong tool kit so that they are prepared to tackle the rigor of upper school, college, and beyond.
They will learn to trust in their own abilities, and their reliance on both myself and their future
teachers to understand the text they are given will be minimal at most.
SARAH EDWARDS BAKER’S TOP TEN SYNTHESIS 9
References
Beers, K., & Probst, R. E. (2017). Disrupting Thinking: Why How We Read Matters. New York:
Scholastic Inc.
Burkins, J., & Yaris, K. (2016). Who’s doing the work? How to say less so readers can do more.
Davis, D. S., & Vehabovic, N. The Dangers of Test Preparation: What Students Learn (and Don't
Reading Teacher.
Duke, N. K., & Martin, N. M. (2011). 10 Things Every Literacy Educator Should Know About
Gambrell, L., & Morrow, L. (Eds.). (2015). Best Practices in Literacy Instruction. New York: