Research Article
Numerical Simulation of Sloshing in 2D Rectangular Tanks
Based on the Prediction of Free Surface
Received 31 March 2014; Revised 19 July 2014; Accepted 22 July 2014; Published 12 August 2014
Copyright © 2014 H. Zhang and B. Sun. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
A finite difference method for analyzing 2D nonlinear sloshing waves in a tank has been developed based on the potential flow
theory. After 𝜎-transformation, the free surface is predicted by the kinematic condition, and nonlinear terms are approximated;
the governing equation and boundary conditions are discretized to linear equations in the iterative process of time. Simulations of
standing waves and sloshing in horizontally excited tanks are presented. The results are compared with analytical and numeric al
solutions in other literatures, which demonstrate the effectiveness and accuracy of this numerical method. The beating phenomenon
of sloshing in the tank with different aspect ratios is studied. The relationship between sloshing force and aspect ratio under the
same external excitation is also discussed.
𝜎𝜎
rectangular tanks has been simulated by this numerical (2)
2 2
or other numerical results, which prove the efficiency of this 𝜎𝜎 𝜎=0,𝜎
2
method. The limitation of this numerical method is also 𝜎𝜎2 𝜎𝜎𝜎𝜎 = 0, (3)
𝜎𝜎 𝜎=−ℎ
described.
Many researches have focused on sloshing phenomenon = 0,
in a fixed aspect ratio by different excitations. In fact, the
laspect ratio is a ways changed in the process of storage
or transportation of liquid cargo. So it is necessary to 𝜎𝜎 𝜎𝜎 𝜎𝜎 𝜎𝜎
investigate the influence of aspect ratio on liquid sloshing. = − ,
𝜎𝜎 𝜎𝜎 𝜎=𝜎 𝜎𝜎 𝜎𝜎 𝜎=𝜎 (4)
Chen and Chiang [21] analyzed the effect of fluid depth on
external excitation, the vibrations of free surface and sloshing The natural frequency of sloshing is affected by different
aspect ratios, which may change the whole sloshing situation.
The effect of nonlinear factor on sloshing force is also
discussed. Equation (1) is the continuity equation of ideal fluid;𝜎
denotes velocity potential. Equations (2) and (3) are rigid
wall boundary conditions. They indicate that the components
of the fluid relative velocity normal to the walls are equal
to zero. Equations (4) and (5) are boundary conditions
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 3
𝜎𝜎 1 𝜎Φ 𝜎𝜎 𝜎Φ 1 𝜎Φ 𝜎𝜎
= − ( − ) ,
= −𝜎𝜎 − 𝜎𝜎 (𝜎)
𝜎 𝜎𝜎 1 𝜎𝜎 2 𝜎𝜎 2
− 𝜎 = 𝜎𝜎 + 𝜎𝜎 + 𝜎𝜎 (𝜎) + [(
2 )
𝜎𝜎 + ( ) ],
𝜎𝜎 (6)
1 𝜎Φ 1 𝜎Φ 𝜎𝜎 2 1 𝜎Φ 2 .
− [( − ) +( )]
2 𝜎𝜎 ℎ + 𝜎 𝜎𝜎 𝜎𝜎 ℎ + 𝜎 𝜎𝜎 𝜎=1
where 𝜎 is the pressure and 𝜎 is the density of fluid. The ( 13)
over the force
sloshing tank iswall area. Because
determined the tankthe
by integrating is liquid
moving along
pressure
𝜎 𝜎
the -axis and the sloshing models are 2D cases, only The fluid domain of (1) is 0 < 𝜎 < 𝜎, −ℎ < 𝜎 < 𝜎(𝜎, 𝜎). After 𝜎-
transformation, it has changed into a fixed rectangular area:
components of sloshing force would have great influence on
0 < 𝜎 < 𝜎 ,0 < 𝜎 < 1 .
the dynamics of the tank. In this paper, the sloshing force (9)–(13). Δ𝜎difference
A finite is set to bemethod
the stephas
sizebeen
of time. In the iterative
developed to solve
acting on the left and right walls is considered.
process of time, assuming that the values of velocity potential
3. Numerical Process function Φ and the free surface function 𝜎 are known at time
𝜎Δ𝜎 , that is, on 𝜎 time step, the aim is to obtain the values
According to Frandsen [16], 𝜎-transformation method is of the two functions on 𝜎+1 time step. Some difficulties are
used:
equation cannot be solved directly on 𝜎+1 time step because
𝜎+ℎ free surface 𝜎, which is unknown at that time, is a boundary
𝜎= , Φ (𝜎, 𝜎, 𝜎) = 𝜎(𝜎, 𝜎, 𝜎) . (7) curve of the governing equation. Second, there are nonlinear
ℎ+𝜎
terms existing in free surface boundary conditions.
A new variable 𝜎 is introduced. The derivatives of the introduced.
encounteredConsidering (9)–(11)
in the numerical on
algorithm. timethe
First, step, should
governing
𝜎 +1 𝜎
wi 𝜎+1
For the first problem, a prediction method has been
potential function 𝜎(𝜎, 𝜎, 𝜎) th respect to 𝜎, 𝜎, and 𝜎 are have been assigned to the value on time step, but it
wi
transformed into derivatives of Φ(𝜎, 𝜎, 𝜎). The first derivatives is unknown. On the other hand, (9) on 𝜎 + 1 time step was
of 𝜎 can be expressed as transformed from
𝜎𝜎 𝜎Φ 𝜎 𝜎Φ 𝜎𝜎 𝜎𝜎 1 𝜎Φ 𝜎+1
= − , = , 𝜎2 𝜎 𝜎2 𝜎 𝜎+1
𝜎𝜎 𝜎𝜎 ℎ + 𝜎 𝜎𝜎 𝜎𝜎 𝜎𝜎 ℎ + 𝜎 𝜎 𝜎 { + } = 0, 0 < 𝜎 < 𝜎, −ℎ < 𝜎 < 𝜎 . (14)
𝜎𝜎2 𝜎𝜎2
𝜎𝜎 𝜎 (8)
𝜎
𝜎Φ 𝜎Φ 𝜎𝜎
= − . does not appear in the governing equation; it is only a
b t
𝜎+1
four boundary curves of (14) are determined, which means
. Then (1)–(5) can be transformed by using variable This idea should be implemented in (9)–(11). Because the
Similarly, it is not difficult to obtain the second derivatives of that there is only one unknown quantity 𝜎 in (14).
𝜎(𝜎, 𝜎, 𝜎)
substitution:
substitution:
2
(12) is used to make prediction of 𝜎 :
𝜎2Φ 2𝜎 𝜎𝜎 𝜎2 Φ 2𝜎 𝜎𝜎 𝜎 𝜎2𝜎 𝜎Φ
− +[ ( ) − ]
𝜎𝜎2 ℎ + 𝜎 𝜎𝜎 𝜎𝜎𝜎𝜎 (ℎ + 𝜎 )
2
𝜎𝜎 ℎ + 𝜎 𝜎𝜎2 𝜎𝜎
𝜎+1 𝜎 1 𝜎Φ𝜎
𝜎 = 𝜎 + Δ𝜎 [
ℎ + 𝜎𝜎 𝜎𝜎
𝜎 𝜎𝜎 2 1 𝜎2 Φ
+ [( ) + 2
] = 0,
𝜎Φ 𝜎 𝜎Φ
𝜎𝜎 (15)
−( ) = 0, (10)
𝜎𝜎 𝜎=0,𝜎 ℎ +𝜎 𝜎𝜎 𝜎𝜎 𝜎=0,𝜎
𝜎+1
𝜎 denotes the prediction value. Substitute it into (9) and
𝜎Φ = 0, (11)
𝜎𝜎 𝜎=0 (10 ) on 𝜎+1time step; then only Φ𝜎+1is the unknown quantity
4 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
in the two equations. Equation (11) does not have 𝜎, so there Semi-implicit scheme equations of 𝜎𝜎+1 and Φ𝜎+1 (𝜎 = 1)
is no need to do so. These three equations are discretized as have been derived. Moreover, (16)–(21) can be discretized in
spacewill
andbesolved
taken by
as finite
the corrected value
difference of d. on
metho time
The solution
{ 𝜎𝜎22 ℎ + 𝜎 𝜎𝜎 𝜎𝜎𝜎𝜎 𝜎+1
step.
𝜎 𝜎 𝜎+1
{ 𝜎 Φ 2𝜎 𝜎𝜎 𝜎2Φ 𝜎
{ −
2 𝜎+1 Aft er -transformation, (6) has been transformed as
2𝜎 𝜎𝜎 𝜎 𝜎2𝜎 ] 𝜎Φ }
+[ ( ) − 𝜎 𝜎Φ 𝜎 𝜎 Φ 𝜎𝜎
− = ( − ) + 𝜎 [(ℎ + 𝜎) 𝜎 − ℎ] + 𝜎𝜎 (𝜎)
𝜎𝜎 }
2
[ (ℎ + 𝜎) 𝜎𝜎 ℎ + 𝜎 𝜎𝜎2 (16) 𝜎 𝜎𝜎 ℎ + 𝜎 𝜎𝜎 𝜎𝜎
] } 2
2 𝜎Φ
1 𝜎Φ 𝜎 𝜎Φ 𝜎𝜎 1 )
+ [( − ) +(
].
2 𝜎+1
{ 𝜎 𝜎𝜎 1 ] 𝜎 Φ} 2
+ { [( ) + 2 2}
= 0, 2 𝜎𝜎 ℎ+ 𝜎 𝜎𝜎 𝜎𝜎 ℎ+ 𝜎 𝜎𝜎 (22)
ℎ+𝜎 𝜎𝜎 (ℎ + 𝜎) ] 𝜎𝜎 }
{[
𝜎Φ
𝜎+1 𝜎
= 0. (18) 𝜎𝜎 = ∫ 𝜎𝜎𝜎 = 𝜎 ∫ 𝜎𝜎=0 𝜎𝜎,
𝜎𝜎 𝜎=0 𝜎𝐿 −ℎ
𝜎
For the second problem, an approximate method has 𝜎𝜎 = ∫ 𝜎𝜎𝜎 = 𝜎 ∫ (23)
𝜎𝜎=𝜎 𝜎𝜎.
been introduced. Consider two boundary conditions (12) and 𝜎𝐿 −ℎ
(13) on 𝜎 + 1/2 time step; they are complicated nonlinear The resultant sloshing force acting on the tank is
𝜎= 𝜎 −𝜎 .
𝜎 = √𝜎 tanh , 𝜎 = 1, 2, 3 , . .. . (25)
(Faltinsen [2])
𝜎𝜎 𝜎𝜎ℎ
𝜎=1
dinate
system system. T coincides
he initial with
conditions arethe inertial as
described coordinate
𝜎 𝜎+1 𝜎
1 𝜎Φ 𝜎 −𝜎
Φ𝜎+1 − Φ𝜎 𝜎𝜎
( − )
Δ𝜎 𝜎 (𝜎,𝜎,0)𝜎,=and
𝜎cos ℎ( are )set
, to 𝜎
be(𝜎,2 𝜎,
m,0) =m,0.and 1(26)
Δ𝜎 ℎ + 𝜎𝜎 𝜎𝜎 𝜎=1 In
Thethe tank,
convergence of this numerical simulation is1investigated.
m,
𝜎 𝜎 is 𝜎. ; 𝜎 1
𝜎𝜎 + 𝜎 𝜎+1 is the amplitude of the initial wave profile,𝜎which = 3. 76
influences
𝜎+1/2 t 𝜎
(21)
Figure 2(a) shows the time history of the free surface at the
left wall with different meshes, but the time step sizes are
1 𝜎Φ
+( )] . the same (0.005 s). Figure 2(b) shows the time history where
ℎ + 𝜎 𝜎 𝜎𝜎 𝜎=1 the meshes are the same ( 40 × 40 ) but the time step sizes
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 5
1.5 1.5
1.0 1.0
0.5 0.5
𝜉/
𝜉/
a
a
0.0 0.0
−0.5 −0.5
−1.0 −1.0
20 40 60 80 100 20 40 60 80 100
𝜉1t 𝜉1t
Figure 2: Time history of free surface elevation for different meshes and time step sizes.
1.5 1.5
1.0 1.0
0.5 0.5
𝜉/
𝜉/
a
a
0.0 0.0
−0.5 −0.5
−1.0 −1.0
Numerical
Analytical
(b) Wave profiles for a half-period
(a) Comparison of free surface elevation at the left wall
0.30 0.30
0.28 0.28
0.26 0.26
FR/𝜉gbdh
FL /𝜉gbdh
0.24 0.24
0.22 0.22
0.20 0.20
20 40 60 80 100 20 40 60 80 100
𝜉1t 𝜉1t
(c) Sloshing force on the left wall (d) Sloshing force on the right wall
1.0 1.0
0.5 0.5
𝜉/
𝜉/
a
a
0.0 0.0
−0.5 −0.5
−1.0 −1.0
Numerical
Analytical
(a) Comparison of free surface elevation at the leftwall (b) Wave profiles for a half-period
are different.
figures Thewith
are dealt timeby
and
d the vibration displacement
imensionless method: in the Figure 3(a) shows the time history of the free surface
elevation for at the left wall by the two methods: numer-
𝜎
𝜎=1
ical solution by the finite difference method proposed in this
paper and second-order approximate analytical solution by
𝜎= , 𝜎 = 𝜎1𝜎. (27) perturbation method. Initially, good agreement between the
𝜎
two results is achieved, but the phase difference between them
It is found that the results from these meshes and time increases with time. This phenomenon has been noticed and
step sizes are in good agreement, so in this example, a mesh discussed by many researchers (Chern et al. [18], Frandsen
distribution of 40 × 40 and time step size of 0.005 s ensure a [16]). The conclusion is that the second-order analytical
reasonable converged solution. solution is not very accurate for large amplitude sloshing.
Nonlinear sloshing equations of standing waves can be Figure 3(b) displays numerical wave profiles for nearly half
solved by perturbation techniques. First, nondimensional 𝜎 𝜎 = 31.8 𝜎𝜎 =
1 to 1
variables are introduced to the equations. Then, 𝜎 = 𝜎𝜎𝜎/𝜎 a period from dimensionless time t , and nonl ari ty is
is chosen as the characteristic small parameter. Approximate 3obvious.
4.6 t Figures 3(c) and 3(d) provide the sloshing forces
linear equations are derived by small parameter expansion, on the left wall and right wall, respectively (the forces are
and approximate analytical solutions can be obtained. The also nondimensionalized). It shows that slight double peaks
for
second-order
the h sloshing
approximate
mode isanalytical
prescribed
freeassurface
(Frandsen
elevation
[16]) et al. [5].
appear in the time history. This has also been observed by Wu
𝜎 t
𝜎 4 + 𝜎2 𝜎 2
𝜎𝜎 = 4
𝜎 𝜎 is assumed to take the horizontal oscillation; the external
8𝜎𝜎 excitation acting on the tank is defined as harmonic motion:
4 2 2
2 2
4 𝜎 (𝜎) = 𝜎 (𝜎 𝜎) .
𝜎𝜎 3 𝜎𝜎 − 𝜎 𝜎𝜎
− , and are the amplitude and angular frequency of the
3𝜎𝜎 − 𝜎 2 𝜎𝜎2 (4𝜎𝜎2 − 𝜎22𝜎) ℎ cos ℎ (31)
𝜎𝜎 = 𝜎ℎ 𝜎ℎ
8𝜎𝜎4
and
excited motion. The fluid is assumed to be stationary at 𝜎 = 0.
𝜎2 𝜎2 − 𝜎4 − 3𝜎2 𝜎2
𝜎𝜎 = 2 2 2
.
𝜎 2𝜎 𝜎 𝜎 Then, in the moving coordinate system, the initial conditions
2𝜎𝜎 (4𝜎𝜎 − 𝜎2𝜎) are described as
6
2
4
1
2
𝜉/a
𝜉/a
0 0
h
h
−1 −2
−2 −4
20 40 60 80 100 20 40 60 80 100
𝜉1t 𝜉1t
Present Present
By Frandsen By Frandsen
60 20
40
10
20
𝜉/a
𝜉/
a
0
0
−20
−10
20 40 60 80 100 20 40 60 80 100
𝜉1t 𝜉3t
(a) The first resonance mode (b) The third resonance mode
0.15 0.02
0.10
0.01
0.05
F/𝜉gbdh
F/𝜉gbdh
0.00 0.00
−0.05
−0.01
−0.10
−0.15 −0.02
20 40 60 80 100 20 40 60 80 100
𝜉1t 𝜉3t
(a) The first resonance mode (b) The third resonance mode
In order to verify the precision of this numerical method and the time step size is 0.006 s. Figure 5(a) shows that the two
for the sloshing models in horizontally moving tanks, two simulations are in close agreement. In the second example,
examples are calculated and compared with the solutions of the nonlinear effect is strong, so there is a little difference
Frandsen [16]: (1)𝜎ℎ = 0.7𝜎1 ,𝜎ℎ = 0.036 ; (2) 𝜎ℎ = 1.3𝜎1 , between the two solutions in Figure 5(b). Nevertheless,
𝜎 = 0.072 . The grid size of the numerical method is 40 × 40 nonlinear characteristics of sloshing are captured by the two
ℎ
8 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
10 60
40
5
20
𝜉/a
𝜉/a
h
h
0
0
−5 −20
Figure 8: Free surface elevation at the left wall of the maximum 𝜎ℎ (ℎ/𝜎 = 1/2).
6
10
4
5
2
𝜉/a
𝜉/a
h
0 0
−2
−5
20 40 60 80 100 20 40 𝜉h t 60 80 100
𝜉ht 𝜎ℎ = 0.95𝜎1 𝜎ℎ = 0.012
(a) 𝜎ℎ = 0.85𝜎1 𝜎ℎ = 0.03
, (b) ,
, (b) ,
Figure 9: Free surface elevation at the left wall of the maximum 𝜎ℎ (ℎ/𝜎 = 1/8).
aspect ratio. ing in moving tanks. If the nonlinearity is quite strong, this
20
10
15
10
5
5
𝜉/a
𝜉/a
h
h
0 0
−5
−5
−10
20 40 60 80 100 20 40 60 80 100
𝜉ht
𝜉ht
ℎ/𝜎 = 0.75
(a) Aspect ratio ℎ/𝜎 = 0.5 (b) Aspect ratio
10 10
5 5
𝜉/a
𝜉/a
h
0
h
−5 −5
20 40 60 80 100 20 40 60 80 100
𝜉ht 𝜉ht
(c) Aspect ratio ℎ/𝜎 = 1 (d) Aspect ratio ℎ/𝜎 = 1.25
Figure 11: Free surface elevation at the left wall (low-frequency excitation).
the simulation is divergent after several times of iteration; if excitation. When the external excitation is close to the first
𝜎 = 0.05ℎ m, the simulation lasts for a long time. So it is natural frequency of sloshing, the beating phenomenon can
considered 𝜎
𝜎 = 0.95𝜎 for nonresonant sloshing
that the limitation of ℎcℎisi estimated to be 0.012 m. sloshing force.
be observed. The study here is intended to investigate the
is 0.05 m. F
sloshing force.
The maxim imit ical examples calculated before, the length
The ti of f fre tation amplitude is much
effect of different aspect ratios on beating phenomenon and
or ℎ
smaller. 1, the e x
um l 𝜎 In the numer ical examples calculated before, the length
The ti 𝜎1 =
The time histories o e surface elevation at the left wall in
and the width 𝜎 of the tank are fixed, and the aspect ratio is
method still works, with a mesh size of 80 × 20. If the
Then the
aspect
ℎ. For the aspect ratio ℎ/𝜎 = 1/8, the numerical
the limit cases are shownedinbyFigure
de 8. and width of the tank are set to be 2 m and 1 m; the still water
ℎ/𝜎 3.76 rad/s. The aspect ratio is ℎ/𝜎 = 1/2. Now the length
water depth aspect ratio is chang creasing the still
dept
h is 1 m. The first natural
frequency
of sloshing is
𝜎
ratio is less than 1/8, the simulation is divergent. As a result, changed byℎchanging the still water depth . The former water
the minimum limit of aspect ratio is considered to be depth and natural frequency are set to be the characteristic
∗ ∗
1/8. In this critical aspect ratio situation, for 𝜎ℎ = 0.95𝜎1, quantity: ℎ = 1 m, 𝜎1 = 3.76 rad/s.
𝜎ℎ
the maximum limit of excitation amplitude ofis𝜎still
while for 𝜎 ℎ = 0.85𝜎 1, the maximum limit ℎ is0.012
0.03 m.
m, Figure 9 shows the time histories of free surface elevation in the limit
cases in this critical aspect ratio. The phenomena of beating
and resonance are very obscure; it can be concluded that the The relationship between aspect ratio and the first natural
sloshing in low aspect ratio is quite different from the one in frequency must be considered. From (25), it is easy to get the
normal aspect ratio. graph of the natural frequency as a function of aspect ratio.
Figure 10 indicates that the slope of the function curve is steep
when the aspect ratio is small; if the aspect ratio is greater than
4.2.3. Beating Phenomenon in Different Aspect Ratios. Slosh- 0.6, the function curve is nearly horizontal.
ing in a fixed aspect ratio has been studied in many articles. Under the same external excitation, the sloshing forces
However, little work has been done to analyze the response of of beating are affected by three factors: proximity of exci-
liquid sloshing in different aspect ratios by the same external tation frequency to the natural frequency, liquid mass, and
nonlinearity of sloshing. When the aspect ratio of the liquid
changes, these three factors would change along with it. In
order to discuss the effect of aspect ratio, two horizontal
oscillations of the tank are studied. First, the tank is subjected
10 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
0.2
0.15
0.1 0.10
0.05
F/𝜉gbdh∗
F/𝜉gbdh∗
0.0 0.00
−0.05
−0.1 −0.10
−0.15
20 40 60 80 100 20 40 60 80 100
𝜉ht 𝜉ht
(a) Aspect ratio ℎ/𝜎 = 0.5 (b) Aspect ratio ℎ/𝜎 = 0.75
0.2
0.2
0.1 0.1
F/𝜉gbdh∗
F/𝜉gbdh∗
0.0 0.0
−0.1
−0.1
−0.2
−0.2
20 40 60 80 100 20 40 60 80 100
𝜉ht 𝜉ht
0.22 elevation at the left wall in four different aspect ratios, where
the parameters are nondimensionalized :
0.21
𝜎 = 𝜎ℎ𝜎, 𝜎 =𝜎 . (33)
𝜎ℎ
F/𝜉gbdh∗
0.20
The amplitude of free surface elevation is quite large in
Figure 11(a), which shows strong nonlinearity of sloshing,
0.19 while in Figures 11(b), 11(c), and 11(d), the amplitudes are
nearly the same, smaller than the amplitude in Figure 11(a),
so the nonlinear effects are weaker in these three sloshing
0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 situations.
h/b Figure 12 shows the time histories of resultant sloshing
Nonlinear force acting on the tank (the forces are also nondimensional-
∗
Linear ized: 𝜎= 𝜎/𝜎𝜎𝜎𝜎ℎ ). The amplitudes of the sloshing force
are extracted in Figure 12. In order to study the effect of
Figure 13: Tendency of amplitude of sloshing force (low-frequency nonlinear factor, linear sloshing models by Abramson [1] are
excitation). calculated under the same condition to make comparisons.
The relationship between the amplitude of sloshing force and
aspect ratio is shown in Figure 13. It is obvious that both
described as 𝜎ℎ = 0.03
to a low-frequency 𝜎ℎ = The
excitation. 3.4 movement of the tank is linear and nonlinear results have the same trend: decreasing
m, rad/s. Figure 10 suggests first and then increasing. On the one hand, the rise of the
that if the aspect ratio is 0.3, the corresponding natural aspect ratio increases the natural frequency, which makes
frequency is 3.4 rad/s. Our aim is to analyze the influence of the sloshing far from resonance and reduces sloshing forces.
this low-frequency excitation on the high aspect ratio slosh- On the other hand, the rise of the aspect ratio increases the
ing system. Figure 11 shows the time histories of free surface mass of the liquid, thereby increasing the sloshing forces.
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 11
20
15
10
10
5
𝜉/a
𝜉/a
0
h
h
0
−5
−10 −10
20 40 60 80 100 20 40 60 80 100
𝜉ht 𝜉ht
(a) Aspect ratio ℎ/𝜎 = 0.5 (b) Aspect ratio ℎ/𝜎 = 0.45
10
10
5
5
𝜉/a
𝜉/a
0
h
h
−5
−5
−10
20 40 60 80 100 20 40 60 80 100
𝜉ht 𝜉ht
(c) Aspect ratio ℎ/𝜎 = 0.4 (d) Aspect ratio ℎ/𝜎 = 0.35
Figure 14: Free surface elevation at the left wall (high-frequency excitation).
For the sloshing in aspect ratio ℎ/𝜎 = 0.5 , the excitation about significant changes in the natural frequency, so the
frequency is close to the natural frequency. If aspect ratio beating phenomenon has changed greatly even if the aspect
is increased, the factor of reducing sloshing force is more ratio is slightly decreased. The resultant sloshing forces acting
dominant. However, for the sloshing in high aspect ratios on the tank are also calculated. The relationship between the
ℎ/𝜎 > 0.75 , the rise of aspect ratio brings about slight changes amplitude of sloshing force and aspect ratio is showed in
in the natural frequency, so the factor of increasing sloshing Figure 15. The reduction of the aspect ratio makes the natural
force is more dominant. Comparing nonlinear results with frequency far from the excitation frequency; meanwhile, it
linear ones in Figure 13, some conclusions are obtained. First, decreases the mass of the liquid in the tank. So both of the
the nonlinearity of sloshing always decreases sloshing force. factors reduce sloshing force. As the aspect ratio decreases,
Second, to a certain extent, the difference between linear and the difference between linear and nonlinear amplitude of
nonlinear amplitude reflects the effect of nonlinear factor sloshing force also decreases. The reason is that nonlinear
on sloshing force. For the sloshing in aspect ratio ℎ/𝜎 = effects are becoming weaker, and the sloshing force itself is
0.5, the difference is the largest, while for the other sloshing also decreasing.
situations, the differences are nearly the same. This result
accords with the conclusion in Figure 11. Third, nonlinearity is
an important factor in large amplitude sloshing, which should 5. Conclusions
not be neglected.
Then, the tank is subjected to a high-frequency excitation. A new finite difference method based on the prediction of free
T e movement of the tank is described as 𝜎ℎ = 0.015 m,
h surface has been developed and used to simulate nonlinear
𝜎 = 4 sloshing phenomenon in tanks by the potential flow theory.
ℎ rad/s. Our
quency aim ison
excitation to analyze the influence
the low aspect of this
ratio sloshing After 𝜎-transformation, the fluid domain is transformed to a
hi gh-fre
system. Figure 14 shows the time histories of free surface rectangle, and a predictor-corrector scheme for free surface
elevation at the left wall in four different aspect ratios. As is used in the iteration of time; then the governing equation
the aspect ratio decreases, the amplitude and period of free and boundary conditions are approximately linearized and
surface elevation are diminishing. For the sloshing in low solved in every time step. The convergence of this method
aspect ratiosℎ/𝜎 < 0.5, the reduction of aspect ratio brings is surveyed. The numerical examples of standing waves and
12 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
International
Journal of Journal of
Mathematics and Discrete Mathematics
Mathematical
Sciences