DESIGN DATA
SUPERSTRUCTURE DETAILS
Span (C/C of Expansion Joint) = 4.504 m
Width of bearing at each end = 0.3 m
Overall Thickness of Deck Slab, D = 0.4 m
Clear Cover = 40 mm
Overall Width of Deck = 12.5 m
Carriageway Width = 11.5 m
MATERIAL DETAILS
Grade of Concrete = M 35
Grade of Steel = Fe 500
3
Unit Weight of Concrete = 2.5 t/m
3
Unit Weight of Wearing Coat = 2.2 t/m
MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS
Wearing Coat Thickness = 0.065 m
Width of Crash Barrier = 0.500 m
Width of RCC Railing = 0.000 m
Expansion Joint = 20 mm
0.500 0.500
11.500
12.5
0.4
0.3 3.884
4.184
4.50
ANALYSIS
Analysis has been done cosidering unit width of slab
Hence, width of slab, b = 1.0 m
Effective Span, lo = Min of C/C distance between bearings AND (l+d)
(Cl. 7.6.2.1, IRC:112‐2011)
Where,
l = Clear Span between supports = 3.884 m
d = Effective Depth = 0.352 m
l + d = = 4.236 m
and, C/C of bearings = 4.184 m
Analysis: Dead Load (DL)
2
C/S Area, A = b x D = 0.40 m
UDL, w = A x Unit Wt.of concrete = 1 t/m
4.484
1 t/m
4.184
Ra = 2.2 Rb = 2.2
FBD for Simply Supported Slab of unit width due to DL
Reaction at supports due to DL (Annexure I) = 2.2 t
Shear at distance effective depth from face of support = 1.9 t
Maximum Bending Moment at mid‐span due to DL (Annexure I) = 2.177 t‐m
Analysis: Super‐imposed Dead Load (SIDL)
Crash Barrier:
Dispersed Width of Crash Barrier weight (0.5+Thk of slab) = 0.900 m
Crash Barrier Weight (Annexure II) = 0.7 t/m
Therefore, Crash Barrier UDL = 0.8 t/m
4.484
0.8 t/m
4.184
Ra = 1.7 Rb = 1.7
FBD for Simply Supported Slab of unit width due to SIDL
Reaction at supports due to SIDL (Annexure I) = 1.7 t
Shear at distance effective depth from face of support = 1.4 t
Maximum Bending Moment at mid‐span due to SIDL (Annexure I) = 1.7 t‐m
Analysis: Surfacing (Wearing Coat)
Wearing Coat
UDL due to Wearing Coat = 0.065 x 1 x 2.2 = 0.200 t/m
Reaction at supports due to Surfacing (Annexure 1) = 0.4 t
Shear at distance effective depth from face of support = 0.3 t
Maximum Bending Moment at mid‐span due to SIDL (Annexure I) = 0.4 t‐m
Analysis: Live Load (LL)
Dispersion of Load across the Span:
Effective Width (Cl. B3.2, Informative Annexure B‐3, IRC: 112‐2011 )
Width of slab effective in resisting the bending moment due to the concentrated loads is,
beff = α . a . (1 ‐ a/lo) + b1
where,
beff = the effective width of slab on which the load acts
lo = effective span
a = the distance of the c.g. of the concentrated load from the nearer support.
b1 = the breadth of the concentrated area of the load i.e the dimension of the wheel in
transverse direction + twice the thick. of wearing coat above the structural slab
α = constant depending on ( total width of slab (b) /lo)
Therefore,
lo = 4.184 m
α = 3.00 ( For b / lo = 12.5 / 4.184 = 2.988 )
LL Analysis for Maximum Bending Moment
70RT
Length of each track (parallel to span) = 4.57 m
Width of each track (across the span) = 0.84 m
C/C Distance between tracks (across the span) = 2.06 m
Clear distance from crash‐barrier to track edge = 1.2 m
Live Load Position for Maximum Bending Moment (BM) at Mid‐span CG of 70RT at
=
of Slab Midspan of Slab
70RT
4.57
4.184
LL Position for Maximum Bending Moment at Mid‐span and corresponding UDL:
Dispersion width
Span (Cl. B3.3,
IRC: 112‐2011)
Width along
Width along
Span (w.r.t.
across span
Availability)
availability)
Dispersion
Dispersion
(w.r.t.
Load
LL a b1 α beff beff /2
intensity
t m m m m m m m t/m
70 2.092 0.970 3.00 4.11 2.05 6.168 5.5 4.184 2.67
0.84 0.84
along span
4.57 1.2 0.50
SPAN
2.06 Minimum of 0.42+1.2+0.5=2.12
& beff/2
Dispersion across & along span
2.67
0 4.184 0
4.184
FBD for Simply Supported Slab of unit width due to LL 70RT
Reaction at supports due to 70RT LL = 5.59 t
Moment at Mid‐span due to 70RT LL = 5.85 t‐m
70RW
Length of each wheel (parallel to span) = 0.263 m
Width of each wheel (across the span) = 0.81 m
C/C Distance between wheel (across the span) = 1.93 m
Clear distance from crash‐barrier to wheel edge = 1.2 m
1.93 0.43 1.2 0.500
CARRIAGEWAY
a 0.81 0.81
0.263
1.20 0.50
SPAN
1.93 Minimum of 0.43+1.2+0.5=2.13
& beff/2
Dispersion across & along span
17 17 0 0 0 #VALUE!
1.10
4.184
4.48
Live Load Position for Maximum Bending Moment (BM) at Mid‐span:
Dispersion width
Span (Cl. B3.3,
IRC: 112‐2011)
Width along
Width along
Span (w.r.t.
across span
Availability)
availability)
Dispersion
Dispersion
(w.r.t.
Load
LL a b1 α beff beff /2
intensity
t m m m m m m m t/m
17 1.100 0.940 3.000 3.372 1.686 5.302 1.193 1.193 2.687
17 1.284 0.940 3.000 3.610 1.805 5.540 1.193 1.193 2.572
4.184
4.48
Maximum Reaction at support due to 70RW LL = 3.823 t
Moment at Mid‐span due to 70RW LL = 3.24 t‐m
40TB
Length of each wheel (parallel to span) = 0.263 m
Width of each wheel (across the span) = 0.81 m
C/C Distance between wheel (across the span) = 1.93 m
Clear distance from crash‐barrier to wheel edge = 1.2 m
a 0.81 0.81
0.263
1.20 0.50
SPAN
1.93 Minimum of 0.43+1.2+0.5=2.13
& beff/2
Dispersion across & along span
20 20 0 0 0 #VALUE!
0.93
4.184
4.48
Live Load Position for Maximum Bending Moment (BM) at Mid‐span:
Dispersion width
Span (Cl. B3.3,
IRC: 112‐2011)
Width along
Width along
Span (w.r.t.
across span
Availability)
availability)
Dispersion
Dispersion
(w.r.t.
Load
LL a b1 α beff beff /2
intensity
t m m m m m m m t/m
20 0.930 0.940 3.000 3.110 1.555 5.040 1.193 1.193 3.326
20 2.034 0.940 3.000 4.076 2.038 6.006 1.193 1.193 2.791
3.326 2.791 0.000 0.000 0.000 #VALUE!
4.184
4.48
Maximum Reaction at support due to 70RW LL = 4.513 t
Moment at Mid‐span due to 70RW LL = 4.509 t‐m
LL Analysis for Maximum Shear Force
70RT
Live Load Position for Maximum Shear Force (SF) = Tail of Vehicle at deff from support
4.57
4.184
Dispersion width
Span (Cl. B3.3,
IRC: 112‐2011)
Width along
Width along
Span (w.r.t.
across span
Availability)
availability)
Dispersion
Dispersion
(w.r.t.
Load
LL a b1 α beff beff /2
intensity
t m m m m m m m t/m
70 2.594 0.970 3.00 3.93 1.96 5.99 5.5 4.184 2.75
2.75
4.184
Ra = 5.76 t
Rb = 5.76 t
Maximum Reaction at Support = Ra = 5.76 t
Shear Force at distance of eff. depth, d from face of support = 4.79 t
40TB
Live Load Position for Maximum Shear Force (SF) at deff:
20 20 0 0 0 0
0.03
4.184
4.48
Span (Cl. B3.3,
IRC: 112‐2011)
width across
Width along
Width along
Span (w.r.t.
span (w.r.t.
Availability)
availability)
Dispersion
Dispersion
Dispersion
Load
LL a b1 α beff beff /2
intensity
t m m m m m m m t/m
20 0.030 0.940 3.000 1.029 0.515 2.059 1.193 0.6265 15.507
20 1.250 0.940 3.000 3.570 1.785 5.500 1.193 1.193 3.048
4.184
4.48
Maximum Reaction at support due to 70RW LL = 11.365 t
Shear Force at distance of eff. depth, d from face of support = 5.800 t
Summary
Force/Mo Governing
DL SIDL Surfacing 70RT IF 70RW IF 40tb
ments LL with IF
Shear Force Moment at
Maximum Maximum
Midspan
SIDL
(Crash 1.7 1.4 1.35 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Barrier)
Surfacing
(Wearing 0.4 0.3 1.75 1.00 1.20 1.20 1.20
Coat)
Factored Bending Moment and Shear Force
Factored Bending Moment 16.955 9.790 11.705 9.877 4.393
Factored Shear Force 15.863 9.029 10.911 9.098 3.661
REINFORCEMENT
Min. Reinforcement in main direction as pert Cl. 16.6.1.1 (2), IRC: 112‐2011
Min. Reinforcement in transverse direction (distribution) as pert Cl. 16.6.1.1 (3), IRC: 112‐2011
Reinforce Reinforcement Provided
ment
Location
(Ast) Ast
Required Bar ‐ 1 Spacing Bar ‐ 2 Spacing
provided
Along the Span
At Bottom Face (Main reinf.) 1162.189 16 100 0 100 2010.619
At Top Face 457.600 12 100 0 150 1130.973
Across the Span
At Top/Bottom Face (Distribution reinf.) 290.547 12 200 0 200 565.487
Design Constants
fy = 500 MPa
fck = 35 MPa
Es = 200 GPa (Cl. 6.2.2, IRC: 112-2011)
Ecm = 31 Gpa (Table 6.5, IRC: 112-2011) m1 = 6.4516
D (top) = 0.400 m
d (top) = 0.352 m
Check for Strength {ULS: Basic Combination (Max Bending Moment)}
Xu,max/d Rlim dmin pt,req/100 R pt,lim Xu
0.0035/ Xu,max d
Section 0.362*fck*(Xu,max/d) dprovided 2 Ast,req 41.61*(fck/fy) Ast,lim Ast,provided Check (0.87*fy*Ast)/ Check
(0.0055+ (m) √(Mu/Rlim *b) (Check) Ast,req/bd Mu/bd
*(1-0.416Xu,max/d) *(Xu,max/d) (0.362*fck*b)
0.87Fy/Es)
Mid Span 0.456 0.161 4.682 190.303 352.000 OK 0.003 1.368 1162.19 1.328 4675.5 2010.619 OK 69.031 Under-reinf
Check for Shear {ULS: Basic Combination (Max Shear Force as per Clause 10.3.2 & 10.3.3 of IRC: 112‐2011)}
K αcc ϒm fcd σcp ρ1 VRd.c1 Vmin VRd.c2 VEd
Section Ved 1+√(200/d) Ned Ned/Ac Asl Asl/(bw.d) (0.12*K*(80*ρ1*fck)^0.33 0.031*K3/2*f (vmin+0.15.σc VRd.c 0.5*bw*d*0.6*(1- Check
Cl. 6.4.2.8 αcc*fck/ϒm
<=2 <=0.2*fcd <=0.02 +0.15*σcp)*bw.d ck1/2 p)bw.d fck/310)*fcd
Check for Maximum Shear capacity
= 0.5 sin-1 [ 2*VNS
z Vrdmax = cw * bw *
Section Ved bw cw 1 Check / (cw * bw * z * v1 * θadopted
z * 1 * fcd /2
0.9*d fcd) ]
Support 15.863 1000 316.800 1.000 0.532 134.357 OK 3.390 22
Check for Stresses (SLS: Rare & Quasi‐Permanent Combination)
Rare Combination Quasi Permanent Combination
m Xu 2nd MOI, Icr Comp Tensile Comp Tensile
Permissi Permissib
Stress, Stress, Stress, Permissible Stress,
ble le
Concrete Steel Concrete Steel
Section Moment Moment
(-m*Ast+ Check Check Check
Min of b*Xu3/3+m*Ast*(d- (Ton-m) m*M*(d- (Ton-m) m*M*(d-
2* 2
√(m Ast +2*b*d*m*A M*Xu/Icr 0.48*fck 0.60*fy M*Xu/Icr 0.36*fck
m1/m2 Xu)^2 Xu)/Icr Xu)/Icr
st))/b
Mid Span 6.452 83.467 1.13E+09 11.705 8.65 16.8 OK 179.58 300 OK 4.393 3.247 12.6 OK 67.39
Check for Crack Width (SLS: Frequent Combination)
Check for Crack Width in Concrete (Clause 12.3.3, IRC: 112‐2011)
Ast,min fct,eff kc σc
Section Ast, provided fctm Max of 2.9 0.4[1- h h* k1 k Xu h-Xu Act Check
kc*k*fct,eff*Act/σs or fctm σc/(k1.(h/h*).fct,eff)]<=1
NEd/bh
Mid Span 2010.619 431.520 2.5 2.9 0.4 0.400 0.4 1.5 0 0.930 200.000 200.000 200000 OK
Calculation of Crack Width (Clause 12.3.4, IRC: 112‐2011)
c k1 k2 ρρ.eff Sr,max εsm-εcm Wk
Section 5 (c+φ/2) Check σsc kt fct,eff (σsc-kt (fct,eff/ρρ.eff)* 0.6*σsc/Es Sr,max* (εsm- Check
Cover 0.8 or 1.6 0.5 or 1.0 As/Ac,eff (3.4c+0.425k1k2φ)/ρρ.eff
(1+αe.ρρ.eff))/Es εcm)
Mid Span 40 240 OK 0.8 0.5 0.017 298.338 67.39 0.5 2.9 -0.00014 0.000202 0.060 OK
Check for Deflection (SLS: Frequent Combination) (Cl. 12.4, IRC: 112‐ 2011)
Span(m) 4.504 m
Permissible Deflection(mm) L/800 5.63 mm OK
Design of Bracket
0.3
Span of Approach slab = 4 m
0.3 Thickness of Approach slab = 0.4 m
Width considered per meter = 1 m
Density of concrete = 2.5 t/cum
0.3
0.4 Live load = 70RT one tyre load = 35t for 4.57m length
Effective width = 0.99 m
Load per sqm = 7.74 t/sqm
Reaction due to LL = 15.317 t
Design of Bracket over dirt wall for Corbel along Transverse Direction
Span Effective Vertical load Factor
a
Direction width DL SIDL LL DL LL
0.200 1.000 2.000 0.000 15.317 1.400 1.500
Direct
fsy Avf Tension - Flexure Tension - Af Primary Tensile
At Reinforcement = Max of Provide Reinforcement
Horizontal Stirrups A h =
Provide Reinforcement
Max of
0.5 Af
0.3333 Avf Diameter Legged Layers Check
277.23 12 2 3 OK