5/8/2019 Tk20 by Watermark | Field Experience Student Teaching - EDST4380 - Fall 2018

STUDENT TEACHING - EDST4380 - FALL 2018

Click to Download the most recent blank Student Teaching Final Evaluation Form.

Use the search box to nd the Final Evaluation.

STUDENT TEACHER INFO

NOTE: Yellow highlights indicate areas in which the student teacher has little control and/or responsibility. Therefore, no rating is
required in these areas. Some wording of *FfT has been added or modi ed by Texas State to more appropriately align with the student
teacher role. Adjustments appear in italics.

*FfT = Danielson Framework for Teaching

Student Teacher

John Davis

Date of Evaluation

10/09/2018

Grade or Subject

Elementary music

School/District

Stone Oak Elementary/ North East ISD

Student Teaching Faculty

Mrs. Bonnie DeWind

Cooperating Teacher

Mrs. Ashley Carlson

COOPERATIVE STATEMENT

Student Teaching Faculty's and Cooperating Teacher's comments and evaluations will be included in a single form.

Yes
EVALUATION SCALE DESCRIPTION

Key: The nal evaluation rubric (below) measures the student teacher as a "student" and not as a teacher already in the eld. In order to
successfully complete and receive credit (CR) for student teaching, a student teacher must receive a rating of "2" or higher on each of the
nal evaluation components.

Ad (4) = Advanced - Displays: a strong understanding of the component; highly e ective implementation of the component with no
need for guidance and/or support; a signi cant level of independence; growth that is often self-generated. Performing independently at
FfT Pro cient level.

E (3) = E ective - Displays: a solid understanding of the component; generally consistent and e ective implementation of the
component with some need for guidance and support; growing independence; adequate and/or steady progress and growth. Performing
with growing independence at FfT high Basic to low/mid Pro cient level.

1/11
5/8/2019 Tk20 by Watermark | Field Experience Student Teaching - EDST4380 - Fall 2018

Ac (2) = Acceptable - Displays: a lack of full understanding of the component; inconsistent or partially successful implementation; the
need for moderate guidance and support; moderate level of dependence; the need for more growth, although improvement has been
shown. Performing with moderate levels of dependence, guidance, and support, mainly at the FfT Basic level.

DNMS (1) = Does Not Meet Standard - Displays: little to no understanding of the component; very limited to no successful
implementation of component; frequent errors and a lack of judgment within the context of the component, even with continual
guidance and support; a high level of dependence; a need for signi cant improvement. Performing with high levels of dependence at FfT
Unsatisfactory level.

NA = Not Applicable

DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION

The Student Teacher

Does Not Meet

  Advanced E ective Acceptable Standard Score/Comment

1a. Demonstrates knowledge of 4  3 2  1  3

content and pedagogy.

- Knowledge of
content and
structure of
discipline
- Knowledge of
prerequisite
relationships
- Knowledge of
content-related
pedagogy

1b. Demonstrates knowledge of 4  3 2  1  3

students

2/11
5/8/2019 Tk20 by Watermark | Field Experience Student Teaching - EDST4380 - Fall 2018

- Knowledge of
child and
adolescent
development
- Knowledge of
the learning
process
- Knowledge of
students' skills,
knowledge, and
language
pro ciency
- Knowledge of
students'
interests and
cultural heritage
- Knowledge of
students' special
needs

1c. Demonstrates ability to set 4  3 2  1  3

instructional outcomes.

- Value, sequence,
alignment
- Clarity
- Balance
- Sustainability for
diverse students

1d. Demonstrates knowledge of 4  3 2  1  3

resources.

- Resources for
classroom use
- Resources to
extend content
knowledge and
pedagogy
- Resources for
students

1e. Demonstrates ability to 4  3 2  1  3

provide coherent instruction.

3/11
5/8/2019 Tk20 by Watermark | Field Experience Student Teaching - EDST4380 - Fall 2018

- Learning
activities
- Instructional
materials and
resources
- Instructional
groups
- Lesson and unit
structure

1f. Demonstrates ability to 4  3 2  1  3

design incorporate student
assessments.

- Congruence with
instructional
outcomes
- Criteria and
standards
- Design Use of
formative
assessments
(incorporates
strategies to check
for understanding)
- Use for planning

        Rubric Score 18

        Rubric Mean 3

Comments for Domain 1:

Mr. Davis has done a very nice job with his planning and preparation. He works very hard during planning periods and at
home to make sure that he has lessons that incorporate TEKS aligned activities and learning opportunities. He
consistently includes exploration and warm-ups that directly support the content of the lesson.
DOMAIN 2: CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENT

The Student Teacher:

Does Not Meet

  Advanced E ective Acceptable Standard Score/Comment

2a. Creates an environment of 4  3 2  1  3

respect and rapport.

4/11
5/8/2019 Tk20 by Watermark | Field Experience Student Teaching - EDST4380 - Fall 2018

- Teacher
interactions with
students,
including both
words and actions
- Student
interactions with
other students,
including both
words and actions

2b. Establishes a culture for 4  3 2  1  3

learning.

- Importance of
the content and
of learning
- Expectations for
learning and
achievement
- Student pride in
work

2c. Manages classroom 4  3 2  1  3

procedures.

- Management of
instructional
groups
- Management of
transitions
- Management of
materials and
supplies
- Performance of
non-instructional
duties

2d. Manages student behavior. 4  3 2  1  3

- Expectations
- Monitoring of
student behavior
- Response to
student
misbehavior
5/11
5/8/2019 Tk20 by Watermark | Field Experience Student Teaching - EDST4380 - Fall 2018

2e. Organizes Physical Space 4 3  2  1  4

- Safety and
accessibility
- Furniture arrangement
and use of physical
resources

        Rubric Score 16

        Rubric Mean 3.2

Comments for Domain 2:

Mr. Davis has a very kind demeanor, and he approaches the students with respect. He takes the time to organize the
space and materials at the beginning of the day to prepare for each lesson. Mr. Davis shows great skill in his classroom
management. He uses a variety of techniques and has seamlessly incorporated the established classroom routines into
his teaching. I have observed that Mr. Davis has good instincts and responds appropriately to misbehavior. He has also
developed a variety of techniques to praise student accomplishment and instill excitement and pride.
DOMAIN 3: INSTRUCTION

The Student Teacher:

Does Not Meet

  Advanced E ective Acceptable Standard Score/Comment

3a. Communicates with students. 4  3 2  1  3

- Expectations for
learning
- Directions and
procedures
- Explanations of
content
- Use of oral and
written language

3b. Uses appropriate questioning 4  3 2  1  3

and discussion techniques.

- Quality of
questions/prompts
- Discussion
techniques
- Student
participation

6/11
5/8/2019 Tk20 by Watermark | Field Experience Student Teaching - EDST4380 - Fall 2018

3c. Engages students in learning. 4  3 2  1  3

- Activities and
assignments
- Grouping of
students
- Instructional
materials and
resources
- Structure and
pacing

3d. Uses assessment in 4  3  2 1  2

instruction.

- Assessment
criteria
- Monitoring of
student learning
- Feedback to
students
- Student self-
assessment and
monitoring of
progress
- Lesson
adjustment

3e. Demonstrates Flexibility and 4  3  2 1  2

Responsiveness

- Lesson
adjustment
- Response to
Students
- Persistence

        Rubric Score 13

        Rubric Mean 2.6

Comments for Domain 3:

Mr. Davis has shown great improvement in the delivery of his instruction. The procedures are clear, and he does a good
job presenting quality explanation of instruction. Mr. Davis continues to work on assessing student performance and
adjusting the lesson to help the students become more successful.
DOMAIN 4: PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES
7/11
5/8/2019 Tk20 by Watermark | Field Experience Student Teaching - EDST4380 - Fall 2018

(NOTE: Yellow highlights indicate areas in which the student teacher has little control and/or responsibility. Therefore, no rating is required in
these areas.)

The Student Teacher:

Does Not Meet

  Advanced E ective Acceptable Standard Score/Comment

4a. Re ects on teaching. 4  3 2  1  3

- Accuracy
- Use in further
teaching

4b. Maintains accurate records. 4  3  2  1  NA

- Classroom student
completion of
assignments
- Classroom student
progress in
learning
- Non-instructional
records

4c. Communicates with families. 4  3  2  1  NA

- Information about
the instructional
program
- Information about
individual students
- Engagement of
families in the
instructional
program

4d. Participates in a professional 4 3  2  1  4

community.

8/11
5/8/2019 Tk20 by Watermark | Field Experience Student Teaching - EDST4380 - Fall 2018

- Relationships with
University and
campus placement
colleagues
- Involvement in a culture
of professional inquiry
- Service to the school
- Participation in school
and district projects

- Participation in
University and
campus placement
events/meetings/trai
nings

4e. Demonstrates professional 4  3 2  1  3

growth and development

- Enhancement of
knowledge and
skills
- Service to the profession

- Receptivity and
responsiveness to
feedback
-
Improvement/growt
h in performance

4f. Demonstrates professionalism. 4 3  2  1  4

- Integrity and
ethical conduct
- Advocacy
- Equitable service
to all students
- Sound judgment
and decision-
making
- Compliance with
university/campus/d
istrict regulations

        Rubric Score 14

        Rubric Mean 3.5

9/11
5/8/2019 Tk20 by Watermark | Field Experience Student Teaching - EDST4380 - Fall 2018

Comments for Domain 4:

Mr. Davis is very professional, and shows a desire for professional growth. He has attended all campus sta
developments and meetings, and even attended an optional o -campus Central Texas Or workshop on a Saturday.

COOPERATING TEACHER'S FINAL EVALUATION

Attach Cooperating Teacher's nal evaluation:

Final Evaluation for John Davis

OVERALL COMMENTS

Cooperating Teacher's Summary Comments:

Cooperating Teacher’s Summary Comments:

I am very happy with the progress that Mr. Davis has made in this 7 week period. It is obvious that he was prepared and
ready to jump into teaching. He is a very hard worker, and his kind spirit has made a positive impression on all of the
students he worked with at Stone Oak. I feel certain that Mr. Davis will be successful in any music teaching position.

Student Teaching Faculty's Summary Comments:

Supervisor’s Summary Comments: Mr. John Davis makes a concerted e ort to challenge negative behavior and to ensure
that all of his students participate in a positive manner during his music classes. He displays exceptional standards of
honesty and integrity with his colleagues and cooperating teacher. He fully complies with school and district regulations,
and returns to school in the evening for important PTA choral performances. John listens to suggestions and supports the
ideas of his university supervisor. Professional in dress and demeanor, Mr. Davis has showed that he is a trustworthy
student teacher; he works hard and is ready for the challenge of being a full-time music educator.
SIGNATURE

Student Teaching Faculty/Cooperating Teacher's Electronic Approval:*

Bonnie DeWind/ Ashley Carlson

NOTES ON FINAL EVALUATION FORM (TEAC)

The score below is not representative of the Texas State Grade. It represents the accumulated score from the Final Evaluation
Rubric, out of a possible total of 88 points.

TOTAL

Total Score:

61.0

Total Mean:

3.05

GRADE

10/11
5/8/2019 Tk20 by Watermark | Field Experience Student Teaching - EDST4380 - Fall 2018

Total Score:

61.0

Grade:

CR

11/11