CASE STUDY #3

The war on cancer has grown stronger of late. Since the Cancer Act in 1939, which many are
unaware of, http://scienceblog.cancerresearchuk.org/2016/02/19/the-1939-cancer-act/
Institutions have abided by a strict code of conduct in educating the patients on their
options for cancer treatment. Many researchers and doctors who tried to reveal alternatives
have mysterious “disappeared” https://truththeory.com/2016/06/26/50-holistic-doctors-
have-mysteriously-died-in-the-last-year-but-whats-being-done-about-it/ Again, such news
is under-reported. Researchers such as Edward griffin has used science through lectures to
disseminate information about the conspiracy behind cancer despite knowing the threat he
is expose to. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctd-QF982mA Griffin has supporters
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdLyMhNdcSc Followed by testimonies
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lytFfgtbMSY and efforts by documentary-makers

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uX8saD8fATw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYiouIQoXgk

In your opinion, supported by evidence, how has the revelation of both sides of the
cancer argument affected your personal stand on the debate for cancer? Should a
family member be diagnosed by cancer, how would this affect your decision. What
would be your course of action?

CASE STUDY 3:
Quote from Family Guy -”why give the cure when you can build it all the way”
research on the doctors, fake doctors, herbal medicine etc
cancer is a psychological sickness.

When people are afraid, they will do anyhting to sruvive.

Supressing Not supressing

- Possibly done to prevent the - If extensive research has been done

existence of people claiming their by actual proffesional practicing
products work. – cancer act doctors, then that should be a good
enough proof that a particular
substance can cure cancer (selinium).

https://www.pcrm.org/health/cancer
-resources/diet-
cancer/nutrition/how-selenium-
helps-protect-against-cancer

- Public’s lack of understanding on - The intervention trial reported by Yu

toxicity of certain substances used et al. (1991) of primary liver cancer
in cancer treatment. If the FDA
says Selenium is good for cancer
treatment and provide a minimun
dosage, the public (unedcuated)
will heed the minimum dosage and
eat more of it, cause it’s good.
That’s human nature, we want
more of what’s good for us.
- https://www.fda.gov/food/ingredient
-
represents preliminary reports of
three separate trials in Quidong
county of China, which has an
exceptionally high rate of this cancer.
The report notes that the recognized
potential risk factors responsible for
the high liver cancer rate in this
county are aflatoxin contamination,
hepatitis B viral infection, and water
pollution. Supplemental selenium of
15 ppm was given as either
anhydrous sodium selenite or
selenium-enriched yeast tablets. The
baseline blood selenium levels of the
subjects in these trials was about 10
micrograms/dL, which is below the
5th percentile of blood selenium
levels in the U.S. (NHANES III, 1988-
1994 data). The results from these
trials indicate that the extremely high
incidence of primary liver cancer in
some localities within this
malnourished population in Quidong
county could be reduced by adding
selenium to the diet. Although this
effect can be attributed directly to
selenium per se, the physiological
effects in malnourished individuals
could be quite different from the
effects of the same nutrient
supplements in well nourished
individuals. Moreover, the etiologies
of these cancers may diff er between
these two countries. Thus, there is
uncertainty as to whether these
results are relevant to the U.S.
population
spackaginglabeling/labelingnutrition
/ucm072780.htm
 - Certain cancers still can be cured,
testicular cancers, etc. so you cant
say they’ve been keeping you in
the dark.

Amygdalin. Amygdalin

- The video, the guy said (Dr John - Many research papers state that it
Richardson) used Laetril (no wasn’t affective.
approved by FDA) and someone
reccommended to him. (WHO IS - https://www.quackwatch.org/01Qua
THIS SOMEBODY? TRSUTED?) He ckeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/laetrile.h
tested on his dog with cancer, the tml
dog recovered. - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubm
- ed/7033783

Rockafella and Cerneiger? https://worldaffairs.blog/2015/10/20/how-

rockefeller-founded-modern-medicine-and-
Pblic image - killed-natural-cures/

It’s a simple economic equation, folks.

Keeping the public ignorant about the causes
of cancer results in more cancer patients.
More cancer patients results in more sales of
chemotherapy drugs, more radiation, and
more surgery. You see, money, rather than
moral ethics, is the deciding factor for the
Cancer Industry and the Medical Mafia. To be
honest, their goal is to provide temporary
relief by treating the symptoms of cancer
with drugs, while never addressing the cause
of the cancer. This insures regular visits to the
doctor’s office and requires the patient to
routinely return to the pharmacy to refill his
prescriptions. This is what the game is all
about folks, plain and simple. Big Pharma is
nothing more than a conglomeration of
companies that can best be described as
glorified drug pushers. Deny it or deal with it.
Stick your head back in the sand if necessary.
Think happy thoughts. Or keep reading and
keep an open mind. It’s your choice.

http://www.cancertruth.net/ama-
history/#sthash.8qNYKSDK.dpbs