PROGRAM PENILAIAN

PERINGKAT KINERJA
PERUSAHAAN
DALAM
PENGEDALIAN PENCEMARAN
LINGKUNGAN HIDUP
SPM BUDISUSANTI
DIREKTUR PENGENDALIAN PECEMARAN AIR
DIRJEN PENGENDALIAN PENCEMARAN DAN KERUSAKAN LINGKUNGAN
KLHK
 DASAR HUKUM - UUD 1945

Pasal 28H ayat (1)

“Setiap orang berhak hidup Pasal 33 ayat (1)
sejahtera lahir batin,
bertempat tinggal dan “Perkonomian disusun sebagai
mendapatkan lingkungan usaha bersama berdasar atas
hidup yang baik dan sehat azas kekeluargaan”.
serta berhak memperoleh
pelayanan kesehatan”

Pasal 33 ayat (4)

Pasal 33 ayat (3) “Perkonomian nasional
“Bumi dan air dan kekayaan alam diselenggarakan berdasarkan
yang terkandung didalamnya atas demokrasi ekonomi
dikuasai oleh negara dan dengan prinsip kebersamaan,
dipergunakan untuk sebesar- efisiensi-berkeadilan,
besar kemakmuran rakyat”. berkelanjutan, berwawasan
lingkungan, kemandirian, serta
dengan menjaga keseimbangan
kemanjuan dan kesatuan
ekonomi nasional.”
DASAR HUKUM – UU PPLH NO 32/2009
INDEKS KINERJA LINGKUNGAN – ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE INDEX - INDONESIA
KETAHANAN LINGKUNGAN – AIR, KETAHANAN ENERGI, DAN KETAHANAN PANGAN

PENGELOLAAN KUALITAS AIR

BERPRINSIP PADA:
1. EFISIENSI SUMBERDAYA
AIR
2. MEMINIMALKAN
PENGGUNAAN FRESH
WATER
3. MENINGKATKAN
PENGGUNAAN
RECLAIMED WATER =>
WASTE TO RESOURCES
4. WASTE TO ENERGY

PEMBANGUNAN YANG BERKELANJUTAN – SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS

 RESIKO KEGAGALAN ATAS PENGELOLAAN AIR

Sumber: Water Footprinting, WWF

SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS – ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE-
SATU-SATUNYA PILIHAN

• PENINGKATAN DAYA SAING

VALUES • PENGURANGAN RESIKO
• PROFIT

• CONSUMEN’s AWARNESS
MARKET DRIVE • PENINGKATAN JUMLAH
PRODUK RAMAH LINGKUNGAN

• PENURUNAN KETERSEDIAAN SDA

ENVIRON- SEBAGAI BAHAN BAKU ATAU
MENTAL DRIVE PENOLONG DALAM JUMLAH DAN
KUALITAS
 ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE – BUSINESS EXCELLENCE

KEY BENEFITS FROM GREENING INPUTS

Reduce the use of materials Reduce expenditure on materials

Minimize harmful substance Reduce cost related to handling:

storage and treating

Substitute harmful
materials with less Carries lower regulatory
damaging alternative compliance burden

Increase use of
renewable and Reduces waste disposal
recyclable materials requirement

Referece: OECD, Sustainable Manufacturing Toolkits, SEVEN STEPS TO ENVIRONMENTAL EXCELLENCE

ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE – BUSINESS EXCELLENCE
=FACTS OF BENEFIT=

Referece OECD, Sustainable Manufacturing Toolkits, SEVEN STEPS TO ENVIRONMENTAL EXCELLENCE

ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE – SUSTAINABLE WATER

Reference: UN WATER: Apost-2015 Global Goal Water

 Definisi PROPER

PROPER merupakan instrumen penaatan

alternatif yang dikembangkan untuk
bersinergi dengan instrumen penaatan
lainnya guna mendorong penaatan
perusahan melalui penyebaran informasi
kinerja kepada masyarakat (public
disclosure)
 PROPER
Dikembangkan sejak 1995
Tahun 1996 menerima Zero Emission Award dari University of United
Nations Tokyo
Sebagai model public disclosure program di beberapa negara Asia and
Latin Amerika
Diadopsi Oleh China, Ghana, India and Philippine
 LATAR BELAKANG PROPER
Penyebaran Informasi menyebabkan

Peningkatan Kualitas Lingkungan

reaksi dan interaksi antara
pihak-pihak yang terkait

Penyebaran informasi kinerja

penaatan perusahaan ke publik
menciptakan insentif dan
disinsentif reputasi
PROPER
Tekanan kepada perusahan dengan
kinerja jelek, dan penghargaan
bagi yang berkinerja baik.

Penyebaran tingkat penaatan berskala

nasional lebih efektif dibandingkan
pada skala lokal
JENIS PERUSAHAAN PESERTA PROPER

Hotel

Rumah Sakit
Jasa
Pengolah
Limbah,
Kawasan
Industri
Pertambangan,
Energi,
Migas

Agroindustri
Manufaktur

14
 PROSEDUR PELAKSANAAN PROPER
Sosialisasi Verifikasi
Penyusunan Penyusunan
lapangan (bila
laporan laporan
Pengiriman diperlukan)
kuesioner

tidak tidak
Penyusunan Pemilihan Pengumpulan Verifikasi Penentuan Review Tahap I Review Tahap II
Kriteria Peserta Data & lapangan Peringkat Awal (Tim Teknis KLH (Dewan Pertimbangan)
Inspeksi & Pemda)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)

tidak tidak
Penentuan Review Hasil Klarifikasi oleh Tanggapan Terhadap Pemberitahuan Peringkat Penentuan Peringkat
Peringkat Akhir Dewan Pertimbangan Masukan Perusahaan Sementara ke Perusahaan Sementara

(12) (11) (10) (9) (8)

Verifikasi
Sanggahan
lapangan (bila
Perusahaan
diperlukan)

Laporan MENLH Penyusunan SK Penyampaian SK MENLH Penyusunan Bahan

ke Presiden MENLH ke Perusahaan Pengumuman PENGUMUMAN PROPER

(13) (14) (15) (16)

(17)

15
 BASIC PRINCIPLE OF PROPER – RATING – CRITERIA
X
ENVIRONMENTAL EXCELENCES

S =

Management System
U

3 R of Hazardous
Conservation
GOLD

Envromental

Development
B

Biodiversity

Community
3 R of Solid
S

Reduction

Protection
Emmision
Efficiency

Water
Energy

Waste

Waste
S C Passing Grade
C O
O R GREEN
R
E E
Passing Grade
Best Practices ; Best Available Technology;
Best Corporate Social Responsibility
BEYOND COMPLIANCE AREA

COMPLY BLUE
SEA POLLUTION CONTROL REGULATION
HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATION
AIR POLLUTION REGULATION INCOMPLIANCE RED
WATER POLLUTION REGULATION
EIA REGULATION BLACK
NO EFFORT

COMPLIANCE TO REGULATIONS
 PENGENDALIAN PENCEMARAN AIR

REFERENCE
REGULATION
DISCHARGE PERMIT Government WASTE WATER STANDARD
Regulation
No..82 / 2001
Ministerial
Decree No.
COMPLIANCE POINT 05/2014
TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT
(Discharge Outlet) Ministerial
Decree
No. 08/2007
Ministerial
Decree
PARAMETER REPORTING
No. 09/2007
MONITORING
Ministerial
Decree
No. 10/2007

PRIMER DATA TAKEN

DURING INSPECTION
 PENGENDALIAN PENCEMARAN UDARA

REFERENCE
REGULATION
COMPLIANCE POINT Government
Regulation
(Discharge Outlet)
No.41 / 99 TECHNICAL
Technical REQUIREMENT
Guidance for Air
Pollution Head of
PARAMETER Environmental
MONITORING Impact
Management REPORTING
Agency Decree Manual / CEM
No. 205/1996
Ministerial Decree
EMISSION STANDARD No. 13 / 1995
Ministerial Decree
No. 7 / 2007

PRIMER DATA TAKEN

DURING INSPECTION
 PENGELOLAAN LIMBAH B3

PRODUCER

FINAL
DISPOSAL STORAGE
(DUMPING)
HAZARDOUS
WASTE
MANAGEMENT
(Government
PROCESSOR
(TREAT Regulation COLLECTING
MENT)
No. 101/2014)

TRANSPORTA
USER TION
 EVALUASI PENGELOLAAN LIMBAH B3

Permit
Requirement

HAZARDOUS
WASTE
MANAGEMENT

Performance

www.themegallery.com
 BLUE
1. Own and Implement Environmental
RED
Document (EIA/Environmental 1. Not Comply with the HITAM
Management Plan and Monitoring) / environmental document/
Permits permits’ requirements: The Company does not have
2. Implementation of the Environmental a. Area and/or production Environmental Document
Document and/or Permits’ capacity; (EIA/Environmental
Requirement: b. If new issues/concerns Management Plan and
a. Comply to the area and/or arise /found related to the Monitoring) / Permits with
production capacity as stated in companies’ environmental specification as describe in the
the document. impact not yet established NOTE below.
b. All environmental impacts related in the documents.
to the activities are stated in the 2.Not comply to the
document and implemented. Reporting System for the
3. Comply to the Reporting System for implementation of the
the implementation of the documents’ documents’ requirements.
requirements.
NOTE:
RED = for company established after 23 Feb 2012 having Environmental Document but have not
submitted permits application .
BLACK = for company established after 3 October 2009 have not had environmental document.
BLACK = for company established after 23 Feb 2012 have not had environmental document and permit
NO. ASPECTs RATING
BLUE RED BLACK
1. Comply with 1. Own waste water discharge permit The company does not have waste
the water to the water body or sea and/or water discharge permit to the water
pollution waste water land application body or sea and/or waste water land
permit. permit. For palm oil industries, or application permit.
2. The waste water discharge permit
to the water body or sea and/or
waste water land application
permit for palm oil industries is in
final process to be approved.
2. Comply with Monitor all compliance points and/or a. If company did not monitor the
the compliance waste water discharged which has to compliance point (one or more)
points be managed as required in the during the rating period.
regulation. b. For Hotels, Hospitals, and Industrial
domestic waste using waste water
for garden watering.
Note:
1. Industry treating the entire waste water to the industrial estate will be stated as 100% comply ( completed
with the cooperation agreement between the industries and the industrial estate)
2. Oil and gas industry injecting its produced water into formation level for pressure maintenance will be
stated as 100% comply.
3. Industry implementing 100% of waste water for reuse and/or recycle and equipped with Standard Operating
Procedure (SOP) and operational logbook will be stated as 100% comply.
4. Industry having waste water discharge permit to the sea but not monitoring sea water quality as required
in the permit will be rated as RED.
NO. ASPECTs RATING
BLUE RED BLACK
3. Comply with a. Monitor 100% parameter as required a. Monitor less then 100% parameter as
the in the: required in the:
parameter 1. Waste water discharge permit 1. Waste water discharge permit
for 2. National or province Effluent 2. National or province Effluent
monitoring. Standard. Standard.
Specifically for Palm Oil Industry Specifically for Palm Oil Industry
implementing land application, implementing land application,
parameter for monitoring for waste parameter for monitoring for waste
water land application, ground water, water land application, ground water,
and soil >90% ( pH and BOD have to and soil <90% ( pH and BOD have to
be monitored) be monitored)
b. Monitor parameter pH, TSS, COD and b. Does not Monitor parameter pH, TSS,
daily debit for industries required to COD and daily debit for industry
do daily monitoring. required to do daily monitoring.
c. Calculate pollution load (effluent c. Does not Calculate pollution load
load) (effluent load)
Note:
1. Specifically for Manufacture, Infrastructure and Service Industry, Total Dissolved Solid (TDS) for water body for waste
water discharge to the sea not considered in the rating process.
2. Manganese Mining refer to waste water standard for Nickel Mining
3. Compliance to the parameter for monitoring refer to effluent standard hierarchy:
a. Effluent Standard as mentioned in the Waste water discharge permit,
b. Province waste water standard (specific)
c. National waste water standard (specific)
d. Effluent standard as mentioned in the EIA or Environmental Management Planning and Monitor
e. Effluent standard as mentioned in the Ministerial Decree No. 51 Year 1995 Attachment C Group 1,
NO. ASPECTs RATING
BLUE RED BLACK
4. Comply with a. Reporting ≥ 90% data as required for : a. Reporting less then 90% data Reporting
the number 1) Waste water quality monitoring as required for : fake data
of data 2) Monthly production (riel) or raw 1) Waste water quality and cause
reported for material, and monitoring pollution.
each 3) Debit for waste water discharge. 2) Monthly production (riel)
parameter b. Providing >90% daily average monitoring or raw material, and
data in every month as required in the 3) Debit for waste water
regulation: discharge.
1) Parameter COD and pH for b. Providing less then 90% daily
Petrochemical industry, industrial average monitoring data in
estate, rayon, basic oleo chemical. every month as required in
2) Parameter pH for Ceramic industry. the regulation for parameter
3) Parameter pH and TSS for Manganese daily pH and/or daily debit
Mining and/or daily TSS and/or daily
4) Parameter pH for Coal, Tin, and Gold COD.
Mining
5) Parameter pH for Agro industry.
Note:
Specifically for palm oil industry implementing land application, number data calculated per outlet base on parameter
monitored multiplied with frequent monitoring and divided with total data must be provided during rating period.
NO. ASPECTs RATING
BLUE RED BLACK
5. Comply with a. Self Monitoring Data (secondary data): a. Self Monitoring Data (secondary data): Exceed the
effluent 1) ≥ 90 % monitoring data during rating 1) Less then 90 % monitoring data during effluent and
standard period meet the effluent standard rating period meet the effluent have been
for each parameter in each standard for each parameter in each penalized with
compliance point. compliance point. administrative
Monitoring data for daily pH and/or Monitoring data for daily pH and/or sanction
daily debit and/or daily TSS and/or daily debit and/or daily TSS and/or
daily COD meet ≥ 95% compliance daily COD meet less then 95%
from average daily data reported compliance from average daily data
every month in a year during rating reported every month in a year during
period. rating period.
2) For off shore mining, compliance 2) For off shore mining, compliance
point for sea water monitoring refer point for sea water monitoring refer
to EIA document. Monitoring data to EIA document. Monitoring data for
for TSS and Turbidity meet ≥ 95% TSS and Turbidity meet less then 95%
compliance. compliance.
3) Discharge Load Data meet ≥ 90% 3) Discharge load Data meet less then
compliance. 90% compliance.
b. Primer data from PROPER Team b. Primer data from PROPER Team
Inspection meet 100% compliance Inspection exceed the effluent standard.
Note
1. Waste water effluent sample can be taken by PROPER Tim Inspector not in rating period and, base on the regulation, the industry can
not exceed waste water effluent standard at any time.
2. Industry can do split sampel from the sample taken by PROPER Team Indpector and noted in the official inpection report.
3. Specifically for tin mining industry using suction dredger or vessel should meets the quality standards of TSS and turbidity.
4. Specifically for hospital, NH 3 free parameters and phosphate does not included in the quality standards fulfillment assessment .
NO. ASPECTs RATING
BLUE RED BLACK
6. Comply with a. Using external or internal accredited laboratory or governor designated Does not meet Discharge/di
technical laboratory. one of the spose
requirement b. Separating sewage with storm water runoff. technical wastewater
c. Sewerage made water impermeable. requirements. to the
d. Installing discharge gauge (flow meter) in the waste water discharge outlet. environment
e. Not doing dilution. without
f. Not disposing of waste water directly into the environment without treatment
treatment (by-pass). (by-pass)
g. Meet all the provisions required in administrative sanctions.
h. Additional technical requirements for the oil palm industry implementing
land application:
1) Conducted land application on land other than peat land.
2) Conducted land application on land other than land with permeability
greater than 15 cm / hour.
3) Conducted land application on land other than land with permeability
less than 1.5 cm / hour.
4) Land application should not be implemented on land with ground water
level less than 2 meters.
5) Eliminate water runoff (run off) to the river.
6) Does not dilute waste water used.
7) Does not dispose waste water on the land outside the location specified
in the permit.
8) Does not discharge wastewater into the river when exceeding permit
requirement.
Note
Specific for mining, energy generation and gas industry are not required to install waste water discharge gauge or low mater to the waste
water and cooling water sewer .
NO. ASPECTs RATING
BLUE RED BLACK
1. Comply with a. Monitor all emission source Does not monitor all emission source
emission source 100% 100%.
NOTE:
1. Specific for manufacture, infrastructure, and service and agro industry:
a. Emission source from non combustion process, emissions source monitoring represented by the one chimney for
each production unit alternately so that all emission sources can be monitored;
b. Emission source from chemical process must be monitored
c. Chimney which only to flow incoming and exit air may not be monitored
d. Chimney which only to flow water vapor may not be monitored
2. Dryer in agro industry must be monitored
3. Incinerator for empty fruit bunch in palm oil industry must be monitored and meet the emission standard in the
Ministerial Decree No. 13 year 1995 Attachment V-B .
4. Emission source shall not be monitored:
a. Combustion units (generators, transfer pump (transfer pump engine):
1)capacity <100 HP (76.5 KVA);
2)operates <1000 hours / year;
3)which is used for the benefit of emergency, repair activities, maintenance activities <200 hours / year; or
4)which is used to drive the crane and welding equipment.
b. Chimney flue gases in the laboratory (laboratory exhaust fire assay).
5. Specific for industrial area required to conduct monitoring on the location or ambient monitoring points referring to
the environmental document (EIA).
NO. ASPECTs RATING
BLUE RED BLACK
2 Comply with a. Monitor 100% of the required parameters: Monitor less
monitoring 1) for industry having specific emission standard refer to this then 100%
parameter specific emission standard, and parameters as
2) For industry not having specific emission standard refer to required in
the environmental document, if the emission standard not the
yet established in the environmental document the Ministerial
emission standard refer to the Ministerial Decree No. 13 Decree No. 13
year 1995 Attachment V-B except for electrical generator Year 1995
set (gen-set) which refer to the Ministerial Decree No. 13 Attachment
Year 2009 Attachment I character a. VB.
b. For emission source from combustion process with capacity <
25 MW or other unit measures equivalent to gas fuel not
required to monitor S02 and Total Particulate if the total sulfur
content in the fuel is less than or equal to 0.5% by weight.
NOTE:
Specific for agro industry:
1. emission source from dryer and smoking room for latex or crumb rubber industries, and direct combustion must
monitor SO2, NO2, Particulate, NH3, and for not direct combustion must monitor particulate and NH3 referring to
emission standard stated in Ministerial Decree No. 13 Year 1995 attachment VB.
2. Emission standard for dryer in industry beside latex or crumb rubber and having direct combustion must monitor
SO2, NO2, particulate. For not having direct combustion must monitor particulate referring to the Ministerial Decree
No. 13 Year 1995 attachment VB.
3. Smoking room for fisheries industry, must monitor SO2, NO2, particulate with emission standard refer to Ministerial
Decree No. 13 Year 1995 attachment VB.
NO. ASPECTs RATING
BLUE RED BLACK
3. Comply with a. Reports periodically: a. Reports < 75% data in Reports fake data
number of 1) CEMS: having at less > 75% data from all everage daily data every 3 monthes and cause
data for in every 3 months (data considered valid if only the industry from CEMS environmental
each has at less 18 hours monitoring data every day) b. Reports < 100% data pollution.
reported 2) Manual Monitoring: conduct monitoring at less once in 6 during rating period
parameter (six) months, except combution porcess with: from manual
3) Design Capacity < 570 KW: conduct monitoring at less once monitoring.
in 3 (three) years; c. Does not calculate
4) Design Capacity in between 570 Kw and 3MW: conduct pollution load as
monitoring at less one in every year. required in the
5) Design capacity > 3MW: conduct monitoring at less once in regulation.
evry 6(six) months;
Boiler in operation less then 6 (six) months: conduct
monitoring at less once in every year.
b. Calculate pollution load as required in the regulation.
4. Comply a. Manual Monitoring: 100% data for every emission a. Manual Monitoring:
with source meet the standard. <100% data for every
emission source meet
emission b. CEMs Monitoring: ≥ 95% data form average daily
the standard.
standard data reported in 3 (three) months of operation period b. CEMs Monitoring: <
meet the standard. 95% data form
c. Meet the Pollution Load standard.. average daily data
reported in 3 (three)
months of operation
period meet the
standard.
c. Does not meet the
Pollution Load
standard.
NO. ASPECTs RATING
BLUE RED BLACK

5. Comply with a. Comply with all technical requirement for chimney. a. Does not meet one of
technical b. Install and operate CEMS for Industries as follow: the technical
requirements 1) Catalyst regeneration unit requirements.
2) Sulfur neutralization unit b. Does not install CEMs
3) Combustion process > 25 MW if content sulfur > 2% as required.
from all capacity
4) Steel Smelter
5) Pulp and paper
6) Fertilizer
7) Cement
8) Carbon black
c. CEMs equipment in normal operation.
d. All fugitive emission source must be managed and using
chimney to discharge
e. Using accredited laboratory or governor designated
laboratory.
f. Fulfill the administrative sanction in time.
g. If any problem with CEMS (out of order), industries
must conduct manual monitoring once in three moths
within one year rating period.
NOTE:
1. Specific for emission source not required to monitor particulate, not necessary to meet the position of sampling hole
at 2D and 8D.
2. Combustion Unit or electrical generator set (Gen-set) having chimney’s diameter < 10 cm is not required to complete
it with sampling hole.
NO. ASPECTs
1. Inventory the type and
volume of waste generated:
a. Identify types of
hazardous waste;
b. Recording type
hazardous waste
generated; and collecting
data for advanced
management of
hazardous waste
generated.
2. Reporting B3 waste
management activities.
BLUE
Identify and record the management of
the entire hazardous waste generated
and /or potential generated.
a. Reporting hazardous waste
management activities regularly as
required in the permit;
b. Deliver the hazardous waste
management reporting to Ministry
of environment, Environmental
Agency at Provincial Level,
Environmental Agencies at
district/city level (include with
Center of Eco region Management )
as required in the permit.
c. Reporting hazardous waste
documents (manifest) as required
for hazardous waste managed by
third parties.
RATING
RED BLACK
a. Does not identify the management of ---
the entire hazardous waste generated * 1)
or potential generated
b. Does not record the type of hazardous
waste produced regularly.
c. Does not collect data for the
advanced management of hazardous
waste
d. Recurrent (repeated) violation (from
last year or previous rating period
violation)
a. Reporting with frequency less then ---
required for hazardous waste * 2)
management.
b. Does not report Hazardous waste
document for hazardous waste
managed by third parties as required .
(copy #2 for original hazardous waste
document for producer).
c. Deliver report only to one of
environmental agency (ministry of
Environment , provincial level, or
district/city level)
d. Recurrent (repeated) violation (from
last year or previous rating period
violation)
NO. ASPECTs
3. Hazardous waste management
permit
4. Implementation of the
requirement stated in the
permit, Comply with the
technical requirement in the
hazardous waste
management permit, not
only for environmental
standard, effluent standard,
emission standard., and
quality standard.
RATING
BLUE RED BLACK
a. Own valid hazardous waste a. Applied or submitted permits Does not have
management permit as application for hazardous waste permit for
required. management but have not met the hazardous waste
b. Applied or submitted technical requirement and / or found management.
permits application for violation in the implementation.
hazardous waste b. Submitted permit renewal and during
management and have met inspection found violation (not
the technical requirement (- implement the technical requirement
in final status to be stated in the previous permit).
approved-)
c. Submitted permit renewal
and have met the technical
requirement as stated in the
previous permit.
Comply with > 90% Comply with < 90% requirement in the Does not comply
requirement in the permit and permit and not indicate potential with requirement
not indicate potential environmental pollution and/or human in the permit and
environmental pollution. health problem. indicate
environmental
pollution and/or
human health
problem.
*3).
Discharge
untreated waste
(bypass).
NO. ASPECTs RATING
BLUE RED BLACK
Emission from treatment a. Monitor all parameter a. Only monitor partial Does not comply
and/or calorie utilization required in the permit parameter (not all) as with all requirement
of hazardous waste: b. All parameter meet the required in the permit or in the permit and
1. Comply with the emission standard as regulation. indicate
emission standard; and required in the permit. b. Does not comply with the environmental
2. Comply with number of c. Comply with the frequency of monitoring as pollution and human
parameter to monitor- frequency of monitoring required in the permit or health problem.
analyst. as required in the regulation.
permit or regulation. c. Never conduct emission
monitoring and have not
been penalized with
administrative sanction.
Waste water (effluent) a. Monitor all parameter a. Only monitor partial Does not comply
from hazardous waste required in the permit parameter (not all) as with all
landfill and/or other b. All parameter meet the required in the permit or requirement in the
hazardous waste emission standard as regulation. permit and
management: required in the permit. b. Does not comply with the indicate
Comply with waste water c. Comply with the frequency of monitoring environmental
(effluent) standard frequency of monitoring as required in the permit pollution and
include with monitoring as required in the or regulation. human health
well, permit or regulation. problem.
Comply with number of
parameter monitoring or
analyzed as required in
the permit.
NO. ASPECTs
Quality standard for product and/or 1) Comply with all quality
Hazardous quality for utilization:
1) Compliance with standard (for
example compressive strength,
tolerance levels of pollutants in 2) Comply with frequency of
the utilized hazardous waste,
and others);
2) Compliance with frequency of
monitoring and analysis.
5. a. Open dumping, spill
management, and handling of
land contaminated with
hazardous waste:
1) management plans;
2) management of spills; and
3) Number (-Amount-) of
hazardous waste spills
BLUE
standard and/or quality of
utilized hazardous waste as
required in the permit.
monitoring as required in the
permit.
1) Own management plan for
land contaminated with
hazardous waste or
hazardous waste spills as
required in the regulation.
2) Implementing of hazardous
waste contaminated land
recovery and handling of
hazardous waste spills as
stated in the planning.
3) Number (amount) or volume
of hazardous waste and
contaminated land and
hazardous spills are properly
recorded.
4) Implement all requirement as
stated in the Letter of
Contaminated Soil
Completion Status (SSPLT).
RATING
RED BLACK
1) Only comply with partial quality Does not comply
standard and/or quality of utilized with all
hazardous waste as required in requirement in the
the permit. permit and
2) Does not Comply with frequency indicate
of monitoring as required in the environmental
permit. pollution and
human health
problem.
1) Own management plan for Does not have
land contaminated with management
hazardous waste or hazardous planning for land
spills but not in accordance contaminated with
with the regulation hazardous waste
2) Implementing of hazardous or hazardous
waste contaminated land waste spills and/or
recovery and handling does not recovery
hazardous waste spill but not of hazardous
conform with the plan. waste open
3) Number (amount) or volume of dumping and/or
hazardous waste and hazardous waste
contaminated soil with spills and/or
hazardous waste hazardous contaminated
waste spill are not well land. .
recorded .
4) Does not implement all or
partial requirement as stated
in the SSPLT.
NO. ASPECTs RATING
BLUE RED BLACK

b. Open burning 1. Does not conduct open burning Has stopped and further Indicated that
activities. manage the hazardous waste intentional
2. Has stopped open burning activities waste, but not conform with conduct
and further manage hazardous waste the planning and regulation. hazardous waste
as stated in the planning (conform with open burning
the planning ) and regulation activities.
6. Total percentage of 1) 100% of hazardous waste have been 1) <100% of hazardous waste Indicated that
hazardous waste managed as required. have been managed as there is
managed confirm
2) all type of hazardous waste have required. hazardous
with the regulation.
been managed as required 2) Not all (partially) type of waste which
3) Material (Hazardous Waste) Balance hazardous waste have been have not been
have been recorded during the rating managed as required managed and
period. 3) Material (Hazardous found indication
Waste) Balance have been of
recorded but not conform environmental
with the rating period. pollution and/or
human health
problem.
NO. ASPECTs
7. Hazardous waste management
(treatment) involving third
parties:
a. Hazardous waste management
involving hazardous waste
collector
b. Hazardous waste management
without involving collectors but
directly send to hazardous
waste processor.
c. Hazardous waste
transportation
d. Use of B3 waste document
(manifest)
b. Third parties designated as
BLUE
a. Third parties designated as
hazardous waste collectors:
1) have valid permit
2) Type of hazardous waste
collected conform with the
permit.
3) Own service contact
agreement between
producers and collector.
4) Own service contract
agreement between the
collector with processor.
5) Does not have environmental
pollution problems .
b. Third parties designated as
hazardous waste advance
treatment or process (user/
processor/final disposal
facilities):
1) has valid permit
2) Type of hazardous waste
collected conform with the
permit.
3) Own service contract
agreement between
producer and processor.
4) Does not have
environmental pollution
problems .
RATING
RE BLACK
a. Third parties designated as Third parties
hazardous waste collectors: does not have
1) have expired permit permit.
2) Type of hazardous waste
collected does not conform
with the permit.
3) Does not have service contact
agreement between
producers and collector.
4) Does not have service
contract agreement between
collector and processor.
5) In environmental pollution
litigation (problems)
Third parties
hazardous waste advance does not have
treatment or process (user/ permit.
processor/final disposal
facilities):
1) has expired permit
2) Type of hazardous waste
collected does not conform
with the permit.
3) Does not have service
contract agreement between
producers and processor.
4) In environmental pollution
litigation (problems)
NO. ASPECTs
BLUE
c. Third parties designated as hazardous
waste transporter :
1) Own hazardous waste transporter
recommendation from Ministry of
Environment and permit from Ministry
of Transportation
2) Hazardous waste transported conform
with the recommendation and permit.
3) transportation equipment used
conform with the recommendation
and permit.
4) Transportation area conform with the
recommendation and permit.
5) Use proper hazardous waste
document (manifest)
d. Hazardous waste document (manifest )
: Using and filling hazardous waste
document (manifest) as stated in the
Head Of Environmental Impact
Management Agency Decree No. Kep-
02/BAPEDAL/09/1995
RATING
RE BLACK
c. Third parties designated as hazardous waste c. Third parties
transporter : designated as
1) Hazardous waste transportation permit is hazardous
expired, but in process for renewal. waste
2) hazardous waste transporter does not transporter
have recommendation from Ministry of does not have
Environment Hazardous
3) Hazardous waste transported not conform waste
with the recommendation and permit. transportation
4) Transportation equipment used does not permit.
conform with the recommendation and
permit.
5) Transportation area does not conform
with the recommendation and permit.
6) Use not proper hazardous waste
document (manifest)
d. Hazardous waste document (manifest ) : --
1) Using and filling hazardous waste
document (manifest) which is not
conform with the Head Of
Environmental Impact Management
Agency Decree No. Kep-
02/BAPEDAL/09/1995.
2) the final location of hazardous waste
management (dumping/disposal/ etc)
can not be accounted.
3) Still conduct not proper hazardous
waste document usage procedure as
required (repeat previous violation).
NO. ASPECTs RATING
BLUE RE BLACK

8. Final disposal (dumping) a. Own final hazardous waste Applied or submitted permit for final disposal Dumping
and hazardous waste disposal (dumping) permits (dumping) but have not met the technical without permit.
process with special b. Own permit for hazardous requirement and indicated violation during
treatment: waste process with special implementation.
a. Permit for final treatment.
disposal (dumping)
b. Permit for hazardous
waste process with
special treatment
c. Amount/Number/Vol
ume of hazardous
waste final disposed
(dumping).
Proper Criteria for environmental degradation management aspect is based on the results of assessment for all stages
/ mine site using the potential degradation criteria to land on mining activities area. The total value (score) resulted
from each stage give the conclude and status of environmental management for of environmental degredation
aspects control.

NO. ASPECTs RATING

BLUE RED BLACK

Environmental a. All stages / mine site (100%) with a total value Not all stages / mine More than 50%
degradation (score) of potential environmental degradation site (<100%) with a of all stages /
Control. assessment aspects is greater than or equal to total value (score) of mine get total
80 (no potential degradation) potential value (score)
environmental less then 55
degradation (potential
assessment aspects damaged).
is greater than or
equal to 80 (no
potential
degradation)
Status of activity:
Land clearing / Top Soil Removal / Overburden Removal / Mining / Hoarding / Reclamation
 PROPER CRITERIA – GREEN
ATTACHEMENT III MINISTERIAL DECREE No. 03/2014
NO. COMPONENT FOR EVALUATION SCORE
1 Summary Document for Environmental Management Performance 150

2 Environmental Management System 100

3 Resources Utilization
a. Energy efficiency 100
b. Emission reduction and mitigation of green house gas 100
c. Water Efficiency 100
d. Reduction and Utilization of Hazardous waste 100
e. Reduction and Utilization of Non Hazardous waste 100
f. Biodiversity 100
4 Community Development
Rating for GREEN 100
Rating for GOLD Qualitative
 ASSESSMENT ASPECT
Consideration form Program Characterization, scale of
activities, impact, commitment to comply, commitment to
FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
continual improvement, determine target of achievement
and its indicator supported by all level management.
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
POLICY

Parties providing SML  Environmental Aspect

certification  Compliance Aspect
 Program, Goal Target,
SERTIFICATION PLANNING Achievement Indicator

 Organizational
Structure &
 Internal company Responsible Person
management Environmental  Training awareness
 External (suplyer) System and Competency
Management  Communication
SPENT OF  Documentation
IMPLEMENTATION
INFLUENCE  Document Control
 Operational Control
 Emergency Response
System

MANAGEMENT CHECK &  Monitoring and Measurement

To ensure: sustainability, adequacy REVIIEW CORRECTIVE  Conformity Identification,
and effectiveness of SML program improvement effort and protection
developed  Recording and Documentation
 ASSESSMENT ASPECT
FOR WATER CONSERVATION AND EFFICIENCY
 Written Policy known and
 Achievement of water understanandable for all level
conservation: 25% of the best , 25- management
75% of the best, >75% of the best.
Award and recognition at least at Having Unit Structure
national level. and competent staff
 Water conservation Program in which is responsible
line or as part of community for water efficiency
Development. and conservation

Strategic Planning,
 Benchmarking for completed with
similar type of determination of
industries in national or Goal, Target, Strategy,
international Indicator of
 Conduct benchmarking Achievement, Agenda
in internal or external of Implementation,
company management. etc.

Provide Training and

Conservation data at less for last 3 years competent staff – having
normalize into water usage intensification certification of Water pollution
data ( amount water usage per unit product Control Manager (EPCM) –
or raw material used – with common unit for responsible to water efficiency
every sector industry and verified by other and conservation.
competent parties)
 ASSESSMENT ASPECT
FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY
 Conduct energy audit within last 3 Having competent personal in the energy
years. management team which having qualification:
 Conduct energy audit covering goal,  Energy auditor
audited facilities, potency for  Training in Energy Audit
efficiency, energy efficiency activities  Education background related to energy auditor
plan.
 Company has had strategic planning: goal,  Energy effiiciency Data
strategic target and indicator of achievement for last 3 years,
 Determine Program: distribution of  Calculate normalization
responsibility to meet the goal and target with production data.

 Conduct Benchmarking
with similar industries,
national or international
 Own energy
manager which is
responsible for  Achievement of
energy energy efficiency:
management. 25% of the best
 Having Team from all
candidate,
responsible for
achievment of 25-
energy management 75%, below 25%
percentile
 Written  Award and
Recognition
Policy
 In line with
known and Comdev
understood
for all level
management
 ASSESSMENT ASPECT
FOR AIR EMISSION REDUCTION
 Conduct inventory, identification, description,
recording method , documentation , discretion of
sampling method and analyst , calculation of
 Company has strategic planning: emission load.  Provide competent staff to conduct
goal, target for emission reduction emission inventory base on training
which is relevant to the and education record.
environmental policy.
 Determine clear program to achieve
the target and goal with proper
indicators

 Having Team with

proper authorization,  Conduct
responsibility, Benchmarking
accountability to with the similar
implement emission industries national
reduction. or international
 Provide proper
resources,
competency, and  Achievement of
budgeting emiison reduction
 Joint or recognize
in CDM
 Inovation in reduce
emission
 In line with
 Written Policy and known and
ComDev
understood by all level management
 Using Renewable
fuel.
 ASSESSMENT ASPECT
FOR EFFICIENCY OF
HAZARDOUS & NON HAZARDOUS WASTE
 Written Policy and known and
General Practices, evaluation of understood by all level management
relevancy or connectivity to the
compliance , infestation, and problem  Provide adequate resources to
of implementation implement reduction and
utilization of hazardous waste
and non hazardous waste:
 Competent personnel and
availability of budgeting
 Conducted reduction on one of the
dominant hazardous or non hazardous  conducted hazardous
waste generated. and non hazardous waste
 Time based calculation from the inventory for at least 2
previous year. Calculated with the ratio years in row
of amount of hazardous waste reduction  Develop and implement
with hazardous waste generated programs of reduction
and utilization of
hazardous and non
Conduct benchmarking with similar hazardous waste with
industries, nasional, Asia, methods, time schedules
Internationa; and indicators to
achieved goals and
objectives.
 Submit the reported B3 waste balance data for at least the last 3 years
 Submit the successfully of reduction and utilization of hazardous and Competent personnel to handle reduction and
non hazardous waste data for at least the last 3 years. utilization of hazardous and non hazardous
 reduction and utilization of hazardous and non hazardous waste data has waste: having relevant training in last 3 years
been verified by external third parties who have competencies
CAUTION: EPR-EXTENDED PRODUCER RESPONCIBILTY
 ASSESSMENT ASPECT
FOR BIODIVERSITY PROTECTION
General Practices, evaluation of  Have written policy on protection of
relevancy or connectivity to the biodiversity and known and understood by
compliance , infestation, and all level management
problem of implementation  Provide adequate structure,
personnel and budget to conduct
 There is an increase in the bio diversity protection
status of biodiversity in the (conservation)
defined area of nature  Having a partnership with
conservation or biodiversity institutions or organizations that
protection. deal with the protection of
 Protection of biodiversity has a biodiversity
measurable positive impact on
other components of the  The company establishes
ecosystem, such as the a formal, nature
improvement of hydrological conservation areas, or
conditions with the advent of the biodiversity
spring or the protection of protection areas.
springs.  Have basic information
data (baseline data) of
Conduct benchmarking biodiversity status
with similar industries,  Has set a clear course to
nasional, Asia, achieve environmental
International; objectives and targets

 Have data for status and trends of managed biodiversity resources

and biological resources for at least the last 2 years Competent personnel to to
 ave publications submitted to the public or the relevant responsible
government agencies about the status and trends of managed
biodiversity resources and biological resources, at least published
by the last 2 years
 ASSESSMENT ASPECT
FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (COMDEV)
 Written policy on community development in the business unit
being assessed
Community  Have governance system of community development programs.
 Application of knowledge management to encourage Development
innovation in the field of community development in the Policy
last two years Structure  Having Team with proper authorization, responsibility,
 Received an award in the field of community development Publications and
accountability to implement emission reduction.
(award rewarded by (minimal) the government district / and Awards Responsibilit
y  Provide proper resources, competency, and budgeting
municipality level or non-government institutions .

Social
 Working Relationship (cooperation) relationships COMMUNITY
Allocation fund
 Realization of fund for the implementation of
 Dispute/Confllict management System for community
(internal and DEVELOPMENT development community development for the last 3
external) consecutive years.
 Submit Data of Comparison for community
 Have governance system of community development funding with the last year
development monitoring and evaluation business unit profit
 Participation of stakeholders in the monitoring
and evaluation
 Having evaluation document approved by the top Monitoring
and Planning
management in the unit that being assessed
Evaluation
 Conformity of implementation with the work
Implementatio
n plan
Conformity of implementation with the work plan  Implementation of programs and activities as
Implementation of programs and activities that are planned stated in the planning document
Participation of stakeholders in the implementation of programs and
activities
 NO. ASPECTs RATING
GOLD
1. Innovation In Aspects of Resource 1) Environmental Management System.
Utilization 2) Energy Efficiency.
The company showed a significant 3) Efficiency Air and Water Pollution Load Reduction.
innovation in: 4) Pollutant Reduction.
5) Reduction and Utilization B3.
6) Solid Waste 3R Non-B3.
7) Biodiversity protection.
8) Community Empowerment.
2. Implementation of Community 1) The company is committed in solving critical impact caused by the company and has an obvious attempt to mitigate the
Development Program impact as reflected in policies, organizational structure, and corporate finance.
a. The approach used in community 2) The company has written strategy and communicated to all stakeholders to develop sustainable community livelihoods.
development (CD) 3) Companies can show that in terms of funding, community development activities is greater than the charitable activities.

b. Planning 1) Occurring of Organizational community development planning process.

2) The involvement of stakeholders in the planning of community development includes quality of engagement and actor.
3) Occurring of consolidation of the community development programs planning and the planning area.
4) Occurring of consolidation of the community development program and the potential sustainable livelihood program.

c. Implementation: 1) The success in achieving the goals set in its plan

2) Participation of the actor-stakeholders- in the implementation of the program are being review from the number participants
involved and quality of involvement.
3) Participation of weak groups in the implementation of the program.
4) Comparison of coverage (quality and target) of program in the running year with the program from the previous year.
NO. ASPECTs GOLD RATING
d. Monitoring and 1) Programs modifications to meets the dynamic needs of the community.
Evaluation 2) Community Satisfaction Level
3) Inclusiveness of program beneficiaries.
4) Changes in behavior or mindset (mindset) before and after the program.
5) The quality of relations between community development staff / community development officer (or other name) with the community
and government.
e. Planning 1) Occurring of Organizational community development planning process.
2) The involvement of stakeholders in the planning of community development includes quality of engagement and actor.
3) Occurring of consolidation of the community development programs planning and the planning area.
4) Occurring of consolidation of the community development program and the potential sustainable livelihood program.

f. Sustainability 1) Economic Sustainability

a. Succeed in community independent, showed an increase in incomes.
b. Establishment of new local economy Institute because of community development program (birth of the institutions, sustainable
institutions, development of institution).
c. Beneficiaries of program / ​target groups are able to develop the capacity of the program which provided by the company.
d. The target group was able to develop capacity to other group.
2) Social Sustainability
a. The existence of social institutions (the birth of a new social institutions and/or revitalization of existing ones).
a. function of social institutions.
b. The company have a category degree of dependency on the program.

g.Social Relations 1) There is institutionalized mechanism of communication between the company and the community.
2) The ability of the beneficiaries to develop a network (external).
3) Community development program raise the social solidarity of society.
4) Conflicts in the community related with the company in the last 1 year.
5) Conflicts between companies (including associates) with the community in the last 1 year.
6) Conflicts between the company and local government in the last 1 year.
7) Industrial strife during the last 1 year (internal relations) .
HASIL PENILAIAN PERINGKAT PROPER TAHUN 2016
 KINERJA PENGELOLAAN LINGKUNGAN SEKTORAL – PROPER TAHUN 2016

No. Kelompok Jumlah

1. Pengolahan Sawit 29
2. Migas Eksplorasi Produksi 35
3. Makanan & Minuman, Consumer Goods, Susu 28
4. Tambang Mineral, Tambang BAtubara 12
5. Migas LNG, Migas RU, Semen, Pupuk, PLTU, Pulp, Petrokimia, Peleburan Logam, 27

6. Gula 8
7. PLTP, PLTGU, PLTG 19
8. Farmasi, Sepatu, Kertas, Industri Kimia 7

9. Otomotif, Komponen Otomotif, Pengelolaan Mineral, Pengelolaan Logam, Elektronik 12

10. Migas Distribusi 34
11. Kawasan Industri 2
KINERJA PENGELOLAAN LINGKUNGAN SEKTORAL – PROPER TAHUN 2016
KINERJA PENGELOLAAN LINGKUNGAN SEKTORAL – PROPER TAHUN 2016
KINERJA PENGELOLAAN LINGKUNGAN SEKTORAL – PROPER TAHUN 2016
KINERJA PENGELOLAAN LINGKUNGAN SEKTORAL – PROPER TAHUN 2016
KONTRIBUSI DAN MASA DEPAN PROPER
TESTIMONI BEBERAPA PERAIH PERINGKAT EMAS PROPER 2015

MOTIVASI, INOVASI, DAN KOMITMEN MENUJU BUSINESS EXCELLENCE

 STEP FORWARD
FROM COMPLIANCE TO
BUSINESS EXCELLENCE
PROPER AKAN TERUS BERLANGSUNG DAN
BERKEMBANG: SECARA BERTAHAP AKAN
BERGESER DARI KONSEP KETAATAN MENUJU
BUSINESS EXCELLENCE

BUSINESS EXCELLENCY: PEOPLE, ECOSISTEM &

PROFIT

SUGGESTION FOR IMPROVEMENT: COMPLETE

THE COMPLIACE – stay ahead of regulation-,
WIN ACCESS TO CAPITAL & GAIN STRATEGY
FORESIGHT: Resource Efficiency, EPR,
Conservation, develop innovation for product-
market-system,
RELATION WITH STAKEHOLDERS: reputation
employee, community
KEMENTERIAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP DAN KEHUTANAN
Jl. D.I. Panjaitan Kav 24 Jakarta 13410
Telp./Fax.: 021-8517257