555 WEST 57TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10019 • T (212) 246-7100 • F (212) 262-6350 • WWW.GNYHA.ORG • PRESIDENT, KENNETH E. RASKE
The amount of Federal DSH funds a state can receive uninsured Americans would mean less hospital un-
is limited by state-specific allotments established by compensated care—and therefore less need for DSH
the Balanced Budget Act (BBA) of 1997, which are funding—but that simply hasn’t been the case.
updated annually by the Bureau of Labor Statistics’
Consumer Price Index. In Fiscal Year (FY) 2018, New In reality, between 2013 and 2014, DSH hospitals—in
York State received $1.8 billion of the $12.3 billion in both states that expanded their Medicaid programs
Medicaid DSH funding that was allotted nationally. under the ACA and those that did not—experienced
an aggregate overall increase in uncompensated
Like regular Medicaid payments, states must pro- care. And while hospital losses from treating unin-
vide local funds (the percentages vary by state) to sured patients decreased under the ACA, the reduc-
receive Federal DSH funds. States have flexibility to tion was more than offset by an increase in Medicaid
determine the distribution of DSH funding to individ- losses.1
ual hospitals, but the Federal government caps the
amount of DSH funding that individual hospitals can New York hospitals experienced the same trend.
receive at their “DSH cap”—their losses from treat- From 2013 to 2014, their total uncompensated care
ing Medicaid patients and the uninsured. losses increased by $645 million, which reflects an
$835 million increase in Medicaid losses offset by a
Hospital Uncompensated Care Trends under the ACA reduction in their losses from treating uninsured pa-
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) cut Federal Medic- tients of $190 million.2 Moreover, in 2014, New York
aid DSH funding under the assumption that fewer hospitals reported losing $4.3 billion from treating
1 Medicaid and CHIP Payment Advisory Commission, public meeting materials from October 25, 2018.
2 GNYHA analysis of CMS Medicaid DSH cap audit data, 2013 and 2014.
GNYHA is a dynamic, constantly evolving center for health care advocacy and expertise, but our core
mission—helping hospitals deliver the finest patient care in the most cost-effective way—never changes.
G N Y H A | P O S I T I O N PA P E R
Medicaid patients, representing nearly 70% of their The ACA requires the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
total reported uncompensated care for Medicaid Services (CMS) to develop a methodology to reduce
DSH purposes (i.e., losses from treating Medicaid Federal Medicaid DSH allotments by the above-spec-
and uninsured patients). ified amount each year. The largest reductions are to
be imposed on the states with the lowest percentage
It is therefore critical that Congress maintain Medic- of uninsured individuals, and those that do not target
aid DSH funding at its current levels. their DSH payments to hospitals with high volumes of
Medicaid patients and uncompensated care. Smaller
How the ACA Impacted Medicaid DSH reductions are to be imposed on low-DSH states (de-
Originally scheduled for FYs 2014–20, the ACA’s fined as states with total DSH payments of between
Medicaid DSH cuts have been legislatively delayed zero and 3% of total Medicaid spending).
and restructured several times. The cuts are currently
scheduled for FYs 2020–25, beginning with a $4 bil- Under an FY 2017 CMS proposed rule to allocate
lion reduction in FY 2020 and increasing to $8 billion Medicaid DSH reductions among states, New York
for FYs 2021–25 (the cuts then expire). would lose $650 million in FY 2020 and $1.3 billion
annually during FYs 2021–25.
GNYHA Position: GNYHA strongly urges Congress to further delay the Medicaid DSH cuts. DSH funding
is essential to ensuring that financially struggling safety net hospitals can continue to serve low-income
individuals and vulnerable communities.
555 WEST 57TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10019 • T (212) 246-7100 • F (212) 262-6350 • WWW.GNYHA.ORG • PRESIDENT, KENNETH E. RASKE