a r t i c l e i n f o abstract
Article history: This paper introduces a gamma-ray tomographic system which is transportable and can be used for
Received 28 March 2012 on-line systems such as a pipeline operation. In a previous study, a feasibility study on a gamma-ray
Received in revised form tomographic system with a scanning geometry of Electron Beam CT was carried out by Monte Carlo
11 June 2012
simulation. This paper contains a successive work on a previous study by developing and evaluating a
Accepted 15 July 2012
real system. To construct a gamma-ray CT, 137Cs was used as a gamma-ray source and radiation
Available online 2 August 2012
measurement system with 72 channel CsI detectors whose crystal is a 12 mm 12 mm 20 mm
Keywords: rectangular parallelepiped was developed to operate jointly with a motion control system. ML-EM
Transportable system algorithm was used for image reconstruction of experimental data. Using the developed transportable
Gamma-ray
gamma-ray system, laboratory and field experiments were carried out successfully. The field experi-
Computed tomography
ment results show that a gamma-ray CT with an Electron Beam CT scanning geometry can be a
Transmission scan
Industrial plant transportable gantry for objects which are parts of processes.
Crown Copyright & 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
0168-9002/$ - see front matter Crown Copyright & 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2012.07.046
204 J. Kim et al. / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 693 (2012) 203–208
2. The scanner principle and basic system design data from two multi-channel counters. This configuration results in
72 channel counting system in total. The overall setup of the
2.1. Geometry and design measurement system is shown in Fig. 4. The measurement system
for tomography operates jointly with the motion control system.
EB-CT scanners utilize a semi-circular ring target for a scan-
ning focal point and fixed semi-circular detector arrays [12–13].
This concept has also been applied for the gamma-ray tomo- 3. Image reconstruction result
graphic system introduced here. In this system, a gamma-ray
source moves along the semi-circular track instead of target ring. 3.1. Image reconstruction process
The rotating angle of the gamma-ray source is 256.31, and the
angle of the semi-circular detector array is 2701. Fig. 1 shows Data from a non-uniformly distributed projection are generally
operation principle of gamma-ray tomographic system. The figure considered as being intractable by analytic reconstruction tech-
shows the movement of the source on semi-circular track during niques such as filtered back projection [14]. For this reason,
the scanning. Fig. 2 shows a 3D drawing of the gamma-ray iterative algorithms can be used here. It is known that the EM
tomographic system designed by the concept of an electron beam algorithm is a suitable iterative algorithm for measuring data
CT. Because it is a semi-circular system, a clamping unit can be following Poisson distribution [15–17]. In pulse mode gamma-ray
used to attach a tomographic scanner to a cylindrical object, as in counting system, measurement data follow a Poisson distribution.
Fig. 2. The tomographic scanner is coupled with an object in the In this paper, the EM algorithm is used for image reconstruction
same direction for a detector arc and semi-circular source guide, because the measurement data follow a Poisson distribution. In
where the source position is the starting point. Fig. 3 shows the the study from Kim et al. [11], image reconstruction results of a
overall system setup of the motion control system and radiation Monte Carlo simulation from the proposed gamma CT show that
detection system. The pinion drives a semi-circular source track ML-EM has smaller reconstruction errors among the three algo-
along the route. The motion control system and radiation mea- rithms: Algebraic Reconstruction Technique (ART), Total Variation
surement system are controlled by a PC with the LABVIEW (TV), and ML-EM. For this reason, the EM algorithm is used for
program. A 137Cs (185 GBq) is used for a gamma-ray source. The image reconstruction throughout this paper. ML-EM is one of the
source, which is 7 mm in diameter and 10 mm long, is contained first statistical algorithms that are derived from the likelihood
in a fan beam collimator made of tungsten. The slit size of the
source collimator is 6 mm in width in the axial direction and the
opening angle of the fan beam is 901. And the total scanning time Clamping device
is around 15 min for 128 projections and 5 s per projection. With
6 mm slit size for source collimator and a 91 cm distance to
detectors, the count rate was measured as about 5000 counts
per second in air.
source
Detector ring
Starting point ending point
β/2
Pinion object
sta cm
)
ble
dju .9
(a = 28
Source movement
R
Fig. 3. Overall system setup of a motion control system and radiation detection system.
CsI detector
CsI detector
1~12ch
12 channel Single 12
Channel Analyzer
12
13-24ch
12 12
12 channel Single
Computer Channel Analyzer
37~72
USB 25-36ch
36 channel 12
12 channel Single 12
counters 1~36 Channel Analyzer
function [15]. Since the ML-EM algorithm was developed, many attenuation coefficient:
successive statistical algorithms have been developed. They have PNy ðnÞ ðnÞ
been improved in terms of convergence and computation time. þ 1Þ i ¼ 1 ðM ij N ij Þ
mðn
j
¼ PN ð1Þ
However, the image quality of original ML-EM is still comparable 1=2 i ¼y 1 ðM ðnÞ
ij
þ NðnÞ
ij
Þlij
to that of other successive algorithms. Because the ML-EM
algorithm is well known and many useful references exist, we
Pk1 PN p
will not describe ML-EM in detail. Details on derivation of original l
j ¼ 1 ij
mðnÞ ðlij mðnÞ Þ
Mik ¼ Y i þdi e j
di e j ¼ 1 j
ð2Þ
transmission ML-EM algorithm can be referred in [15]. General
understanding of the statistical algorithms including ML-EM can
be referred in [16–17]. For completeness we briefly introduce the Pk PN p
l
j ¼ 1 ij
mðnÞ ðlij mðnÞ Þ
final updating equation which was used in computer program- Nik ¼ M ik þ 1 ¼ Y i þ di e j
di e j ¼ 1 j
ð3Þ
ming. Eq. (1) is the updating equation of ML-EM for a transmis-
sion tomography. Here, Mij and Nij are the expected number of
photons entering and exiting the jth pixel in the ith measurement 3.2. Experiment and image reconstruction results
respectively. Mij and Nij are calculated by Eqs. (2) and (3)
respectively. In Eqs. (2) and (3), yi is the measured data in the Tests were performed for three different objects. In the tests,
ith ray, di is the measured data without an object, lij is the beam 137
Cs (740 MBq) was used as the gamma-ray source and the
crossing length in pixel j by the ith beam ray, and mj is linear counting time was 5 s at each projection. The Lower Limit
206 J. Kim et al. / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 693 (2012) 203–208
Discriminator (LLD) was set as 550 keV for photo-peak counting. digitized image for a visual evaluation with the same resolution of
The source circle radius is 28.9 cm, source rotation angle is the image reconstruction result. Fig. 5(c) shows the image
256.341, and detector arc radius is 47.5 cm. In the first experiment reconstruction results for a phantom from the measurement of
(Experiment 1), phantom made of 16 objects of different sizes 256 projections. The results show that the reconstructed value
and densities was scanned. Fig. 5(a) shows the geometry of the (linear attenuation value, cm 1) is similar to the real value for PE
phantom for Experiment 1. Fig. 5(b) is a noise free 150 150 pixel and Teflon which are relatively low density material. And the
result also shows the relatively lower value than the real value for
Al and Fe which are relatively in high density material. This
phenomenon is clearly shown in Fig. 6. Fig. 6 shows the profiles of
noise free image and reconstructed images of phantom from gross
counting and photo-peak counting. The profile is obtained from
the slice value along the center horizontal line. Fig. 6 shows that
the results are close to the true value for the photo-peak
measurement and low density materials. It is inferred that the
discrepancy between reconstructed value and true value is due to
scatter radiation. Fig. 6 shows that photo-peak counting is
effective to get more precise results by removing scatter radia-
tion. In a previous work [11], a Monte Carlo simulation and image
reconstruction have been carried out for the phantom and for the
same measurement condition. Experiment 1 is a validation for the
simulation. The experimental result is in good agreement with
the Monte Carlo simulation result.
Gamma-ray CT can have an artifact of blur due to scatter
radiation. It was observed that the image reconstruction region
surrounded by a highly dense material has a shadow image at the
boundary of the dense region in gamma-ray tomography. The
second experiment (Experiment 2) shows a cross-section image
of a pipe which can be found easily at an industrial site. The pipe
is empty and is made of 9 mm thick steel, as shown in Fig. 7(a).
Fig. 7(b) shows the image reconstruction for the pipe. In the
image, a shadow appears at the inner face of the wall and can be
regarded as an artifact. It is inferred that the shadow is stem from
scatter radiation. Due to a limited detector resolution, the scatter
radiation at a low scattering angle cannot be removed sufficiently
by photo-peak counting. Because a pin-hole collimator is difficult
to apply for this scanning geometry, countermeasures should
be considered. Anti-scattering algorithm including pre or post-
processing method should be considered.
As mentioned previously, it is stressed that the tomographic
scanner in this paper is for transportable use. Therefore, field tests
for the system are important. The third experiment was an on-site
demonstration for an industrial pipeline. Fig. 8 shows a cross-
sectional image for an industrial object which consists of 12.7 mm
thick steel pipe, with 193.7 mm inner diameter and 70 mm thick
Fig. 5. Phantom measurement with 256 projections: (a) phantom, (b) noise free
digitized image (linear attenuation value, cm 1), and (c) reconstructed image Fig. 6. Slice profile of reconstructed image of phantom with gross counting and
(linear attenuation value, cm 1). photo-peak counting.
J. Kim et al. / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 693 (2012) 203–208 207
Fig. 8. Field experiment in a refinery plant: (a) photo of the field test and (b) a
cross-sectional image (linear attenuation value, cm 1).
of fluid distributions in a rotating fluid coupling. Although their [4] Industrial Gamma Process Tomography, IAEA, TECDOC-1589, 2008.
studies are for laboratory works, their detection systems are [5] C. Boyer, B. Fanget, Chemical Engineering Journal 57 (2002) 1079.
[6] S. Leoupil, Applied Radiation and Isotopes 48 (1997) 1507.
worth applying as portable systems. It is also necessary to [7] G.A. Johansen, Nuclear Physics A 752 (2005) 696c.
consider applying a position sensitive detector for transportable [8] S.B. Kumar, D. Moslemian, M.P. Dudukovic, Flow Measurement and Instru-
gamma-ray system. In subsequent work, development of high mentation 6 (1) (1995) 61.
[9] Kim Jongbum, Jung Sunghee, Kim Jinsup, Nuclear Engineering and Technol-
resolution of gamma-ray detection system CT will be carried out
ogy 38 (4) (2006) 384.
and the transportable gantry will be improved in terms of the [10] Jongbum Kim, Sunghee Jung, Jinho Moon, Gyuseong Cho, Nuclear Instru-
efficiency in industrial applications. ments and Methods in Physics Research A640 (2011) 139.
[11] Jongbum Kim, Sunghee Jung, Jinho Moon, Gyuseong Cho, Applied Radiation
and Isotopes 70 (2012) 404.
[12] D.P. Boyd, M.J. Lipton, Proceedings of the IEEE 71 (1983) 298.
Acknowledgments
[13] F. Fischer, D. Hoppe, E. Schleicher, G. Mattausch, H. Flaske, R. Bartel,
U. Hampel, Measurement Science and Technology 19 (2008) 11.
This research has been carried out under the Nuclear R&D [14] C. Kak, M. Slaney, Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging, IEEE
program by MOST (Ministry of Education, Science and Technology). PRESS, New York, 1999.
[15] K. Lange, R. Carson, Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 8 (2) (1984)
306.
References [16] J. Michael Fitzpatrick, Milan Sonka, Handbook of Medical Imaging, vol. 2, SPIE
Press, 2001.
[17] J. Fessler, Iterative Methods for Image Reconstruction, ISBI Tutorial (2008).
[1] J.S. Charlton, Radioisotope Techniques for Problem-solving in Industrial [18] A. Bieberle, J. Kronenberg, E. Schleicher, U. Hampel, Nuclear Instruments and
Process Plants, Leonard Hill, 1986. Methods in Physics Research A 572 (2007) 668.
[2] Jin-Seop Kim, Sung-Hee Jung, Jong-Bum Kim, Journal of Korean Society for [19] U. Hampel, D. Hoppe, A. Bieberle, C. Zippe, Journal of Fluids Engineering –
Nondestructive Testing 26 (3) (2006) 169.
Transactions of The ASME 130 (2008) 09142-1.
[3] Sung-Hee Jung, Kyo-Il Kim, Jung-Ho Ryu, Seong-Ho Choi, Jong-Bum Kim,
Jin- Ho Moon, Joon-Ha Jin, Applied Radiation and Isotopes 68 (2010) 1025.