Anda di halaman 1dari 1

Philippine Trust Co. vs.

Rivera Ruling:

Facts:  A corporation has no power to release an original subscriber to


its capital stock from the obligation of paying for his shares,
1. In 1918, the Cooperativa Naval Filipina was duly incorporated without a valuable consideration for such release;
with a capital of P100,000 divided into 1,000 shares of a par  As against creditors a reduction of the capital stock can take
value of P100 each. Defendant Mariano Rivera, an place only in the manner and under the conditions prescribed
incorporator, subscribed for 450 shares representing a value of by the statute or the charter or the articles of incorporation.
P45,000.  Moreover, strict compliance with the statutory regulations is
necessary
2. Subsequently, the company became insolvent and went into the
hands of the Phil. Trust Co., as assignee in bankruptcy, and was  In this case, the resolution releasing the shareholders from their
instituted to recover 1/2 (P22,500) of the stock subscription of obligation to pay 50 per centum of their respective
Rivera, which admittedly has never been paid subscriptions was an attempted withdrawal of so much capital
from the fund upon which the company’s creditors were
3. Rivera claims that he did not pay because not long after the entitled ultimately to rely and, having been effected without
incorporation, a stockholders meeting occurred wherein there compliance with the statutory requirements, such resolution is
was a resolution, at which the capital should be reduced by null and void
50% and the subscribers released from the obligation to pay
any unpaid balance of their subscription in excess of 50% of Note:
the same
 It is established doctrine that subscriptions to the capital of a
corporation constitute a fund to which creditors have a right to
4. As a result of the resolution, the supposed subscription of the
look for satisfaction of their claims and that the assignee in
various shareholders had been cancelled to the extent stated
insolvency can maintain an action upon any unpaid stock
and fully paid certificates were issued to each shareholders for
subscription in order to realize assets for the payment of its
½ of his subscription
debts.
5. It does not appear that the formalities prescribed in section 17
of the Corporation Law (Act No. 1459), as amended, relative to
the reduction of capital stock in corporations were observed,
and in particular it does not appear that any certificate was at
any time filed in the Bureau of Commerce and Industry,
showing such reduction.

Issues:
a. Whether or not the reduction of capital by 50% is valid; and
b. Does it release Rivera from his obligation to pay the remaining
balance of his subscription

Anda mungkin juga menyukai