Abstract— Diffraction pattern characteristics of powders is the facility to provide a diffraction pattern of a powder
emitted by the VESTA application were observed and material.
then, by means of an indirect measurement, we sought to In this diffraction pattern we can know interesting data that we
calculate the percentage of error of the results thrown by can then compare with those same data but now being thrown
said equations. by an indirect measurement, by means of the equations for
The experiment was performed with three different crystalline structures.
crystalline structures, the two most frequent expressions. This article is developed in such a way that it can be split from
The crystalline study structures were: Cubic (PuH3), the installation of the free application "VESTA", to the
Hexagonal (Pu3H), rhombic, (Al2O3); Obtaining calculation of the average error of the visual measurements
acceptable results, with an average error of 23.24%, 4.57% (VESTA) and the indirect measurements.
and 60.26% respectively.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
TABLE I
CRISTALOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION OF THE CUBIC STRUCTURE.
Equation for a Trigonal crystal structure, find indirectly the
λ(Å) 1,54059 measurements mentioned above. Where h, k and l are the
a=b=c(Å) 5,121 Miller indices, c is the network parameter, Υ angle between
the axes of the unit cell.
α=β=ϒ(°) 90
TABLE IV
TABLE II CALCULATIONS CARRIED OUT WITH THE EQUATION (1) and
CRISTALOGRAPHIC INFORMATION OF THE HEXAGONAL EQUATION (2), FOR THE CUBIC CRYSTAL STRUCTURE.
STRUCTURE. h k l θ(°) 2θ ( ° )
λ(Å) 1,54059 0 0 2 17,5079 35,0159
C(Å) 6,909 0 1 1 12,2821 24,5641
a=b (Å) 4,805 1 -1 2 21,6200 43,2401
α=β(°) 90 -1 1 -3 29,9261 59,8523
1 1 1 15,1017 30,2034
ϒ(°) 120
1 0 2 19,6545 39,3089
TABLE III
h k l 1/d² (Å) d (Å) h² + k² + l²
CRYSTALOGRAPHIC INFORMATION OF THE TRIGONAL 0 0 2 0,15253 2,56050 4
STRUCTURE.
0 1 1 0,07626 3,62109 2
λ(Å) 1,54059 1 -1 2 0,22879 2,09064 6
ϒ(°) 120 -1 1 -3 0,41945 1,54404 11
C(Å) 13,116 1 1 1 0,11440 2,95661 3
a=b (Å) 5,121 1 0 2 0,19066 2,29018 5
α=β(°) 90
sin²( ϒ ) 0,33710935
cos( ϒ ) 0,81418097
cos²( ϒ ) 0,66289065
cos³( ϒ ) 0,53971296
4
IV. CONCLUSIONS
TABLE VII The calculation made to compare the data thrown by the
AVERAGE ERROR OF THE MEASURES CALCULATED FOR THE VESTA software with those proposed as parameters in the
HEXAGONAL CRYSTALLINE STRUCTURE. class work guide are optimal since they do not have a
d Vesta (Å) 2θ Vesta ( ° ) Errord (%) Error 2θ ( % ) significant error.
6,90943 12,8018 0,01 0,01 The VESTA software is a useful tool and you can learn about
the composition of the materials in a didactic way, since it is
4,43451 20,0066 6,16 6,64 an application that can be easily handled with a manual
4,43451 20,0066 6,16 6,64 previously shared by the teacher.
3,732 23,8233 4,48 4,77
3,732 23,8233 4,48 4,77 REFERENCES
ERROR PROMEDIO 4,26 4,57 [1] [Online] https://materialsproject.org
[3][Online] https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categoría:Cristalografía
[4] [Online] http://biblioteca.ucp.edu.co/OJS/index.php/entrecei