ABSTRACT The application of Mass Damper tuned in mechanical engineering is current and long-
term use. For this type of applications, the solicitations are of constant frequencies and known.
However its application in structures has begun a few years ago, under the general concept of
seismic protection. The design of a Tuned Mass Damper for a building entails the practical difficulty
of properly tuning this to the fundamental period of the structure. Through the addition of
additional damping, it is possible to expand the range of tuning frequencies and thus make the use
of an AMS more effective. On the other hand, the excitations to which the structure will be
subjected are uncertain as to their frequency distribution, this entails the certain possibility of
generating a counterproductive effect, since the response may even be worse with the use of AMS.
The incorporation of greater damping, although decreasing efficiency especially in the fundamental
period, produces a better response for the whole range of frequencies of said excitations. The
following work shows in theoretical and practical terms the application of this concept in a building
built in 2006 in Santiago, Chile, subjected to the effects of the earthquake of magnitude 8.8 Mw and
intensity VIII of the Maule region in 2010.
INTRODUCTION
theoretical of an AMS, how the viscous dampers of the two building AMS were chosen
Parque Araucano in Santiago de Chile and details
general construction
mcskYcskY2
2 2 + = 2 2 + 2 1 + ^ h ^ h (2)
EY2 1 = DY (3)
()
() ()
My k y y c y y
k and u c and u
1221221
1211
=-+-
----
poo
ooo
^ h (4)
and again ordered and applying the Laplace transformation to work in the space of
Ms c c s k k Y
cskYcskU
two
12121
22211
++++=
^+++
h^
6 @ (5)
BY1 2 = + DY AU (6)
get:
AND BE D
AE
1 = 2 U - (7)
so that the main mass has minimal displacement, which turns out to be a task
complex, except in the case where the damping of the AMS does not exist, ie c2 = 0,
translates into
ms k 0 2 + = 2 ^ h (8)
If the basal movement is harmonic with frequency ω and therefore s = ωj the previous equation is
transforms into:
m k 0 2 ^ - + ~ 2 h = (9)
k2 2 = ~ (10)
of the AMS,
AMS
While in theory an AMS can be effective even if the mass m is small, in practice there is
technical limitations to achieve this effect, since this implies a range of motion
to a request with a frequency coincident with that of the AMS, but it improves the response
When the solicitation disappears the system, under the assumption of a linear system,
of longer duration.
plants.
seismic event.
according to the model, and that corresponds to a movement in the transverse direction. The
masses
mass of 1% of the mass of the first vibrating mode, corresponding to 150 tons each
and which aim to decrease the movement in the transverse direction (Y direction)
later oscillations.
using weight as a restitutive force. The period was adjusted through the length of the pendulum and
the
Damping was achieved with shock absorbers
CUSTODY LEVELS
For different configurations of AMS and linear damping the response of the
that the transfer function depends additionally on the amplitude of the movements, the
Figure 6 shows the transfer function (without the phase) for the movement of the center of
for sinusoidal records and in some programs the Steady State function is helpful.
In this case, it has been preferred to use linear damping, as the graph becomes independent
in permanent regime.
there is an area between 3 and 3.2 s in which the behavior of the structure with AMS is still
damping softens these curves by decreasing the response of the building and increases the
bandwidth.
of the AMS and the maximum speeds to be able to design the shock absorber, seven were used
Zone II) maximum speeds and displacements are obtained for the shock absorber that
They are similar but not the same. The use of compatible records with other spectra will lead to
different results.
maximum that are data that the manufacturer delivers, for it 7 pairs of records were used,
x and y
pairs of records.
register and displacement of the dampers for the 1st and 2nd set of registers respectively.
pendulum and show approximately the period of these. By comparing these figures with the
When comparing the displacement of the shock absorber with the registers, figure 10 and 13, a clear
correspondence between the registers and the movement of the shock absorber is not observed. It
is observed that repeatedly and in a short time the AMS presents discontinuities in its movement as
adapting to the building.
with a period of 2.75 s that for a buffer with C = 56.91 kN / (m / s) α with α = 2, which corresponds
to that used in the modeling, involves
although it is also possible again to derive the entire curve numerically, this time
for non-linear damping.
the building area found the building finished and enabled although the buffers
damage neither in its structure nor in the rating but this is not directly attributable to the
AMS since the neighboring buildings did not show damages either.
CONCLUSIONS
system.
Bliographic references
1. Christopoulos C., Filiatrault A. (2006) Principles of passive supplemental damping and seismic
isolation. IUSS Press 2006;277-297.
2. Lee Cl, Chen, Cw, Chung Ll, Wang, Yp. (2006) Optimal design theories and applications of tuned
mass dampers. Engineering Structures.
3. Yeh K., Chen CW., Lo DC., Liu K., (2012) Neural-network fuzzy control for chaotic tuned mass
damper systems with time delays. Journal of vibration.