Contemporary research points to infection control as the key determinant of endodontic success. While
epidemiological surveys indicate that success is most likely in teeth which have been densely root-filled to within
2 mm of root-end, it is unclear whether the root canal filling itself is a key determinant of outcome. It is also unclear
how different materials and methods employed in achieving a ‘satisfactory’ root filling may impact on outcome.
This article provides an overview of current principles and practices in root canal filling and strives to untangle the
limited and often contradictory research of relevance to clinical practice and performance.
2
Methods of filling root canals: principles and practices
3
Whitworth
Single-cone obturations
For similar reasons, the sealer-heavy root fillings
associated with single-cone root fillings have not been
regarded well. Single-cone obturations came to the fore Fig. 2. Matched, ergonomic shaping files and filling
in the 1960s with the development of ISO standardiza- cones may inadvertently promote single cone filling
techniques.
tion for endodontic instruments and filling points (34).
After reaming a circular, stop preparation in the apical
2 mm of the canal, a single gutta percha, silver, sectional
silver or titanium point was selected to fit with ‘tug-
back’ to demonstrate inlay-like snugness of fit. The
cone was then cemented in place with a (theoretically)
thin and uniform layer of traditional sealer, at least in
the apical part of the canal. Hommez et al. (35) have
recently reported that single-cone obturation was still
the method of choice for 16% of Flemmish dentists.
Data from the UK has indicated that 49% of dentists
qualified more than 20 years and 13.2% of those
qualified 3 years regularly used single-cone techniques
(36). All experienced dentists have witnessed success
following the use of such techniques in skilled hands,
and within the context of infection control. In a
retrospective clinical study, Smith et al. (37) demon- Fig. 3. Some commercial presentations of Mineral
Trioxide Aggregate
strated 84% success following cementation of an apical
silver cone with sealer, and 81% with a full-length silver
cone and sealer. Equally, all those who accept endo- systems may serve to promote single-cone cementation
dontic referrals are very familiar with single-cone techniques (Fig. 2). Laboratory evidence in fact
removal from canals in which a large volume of suggests comparable cross-sectional area of canal
surrounding sealer has leached away or dissolved under occupied by gutta percha using single-matched taper
the action of tissue or oral fluids. Concerns were cones compared with lateral condensation, and in
compounded by the realization that canal transporta- significantly less time (41), but clinical trial data is
tion is common and that damaged roots are difficult to hitherto unavailable.
seal (38).
The advent of nickel titanium makes predictably
Are our views on paste-heavy fills still valid?
centred preparations more realistic than ever in curved
canals (39), and may make accurate apical cone Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) (Fig. 3) has
fit a possibility in many cases (40). Contemporary challenged the view that paste-only root canal fillings
advertising on ergonomic, matched file and cone are difficult to control, unacceptably porous, dimen-
4
Methods of filling root canals: principles and practices
5
Whitworth
Silicone rubbers
Addition polyvinylsiloxanes are well established in
dentistry as inert, dimensionally stable materials.
Formulations with reduced hydrophobicity are now
widely available, including two developed specifically
for endodontics. RoekoSeal (Roeko, Langenau, Ger-
many) is a white, fluid paste, whereas GuttaFlow
(Roeko) appears to be based on RoekoSeal, with the
addition of powdered gutta percha.
Materials are mixed with automix tips similar to
impression materials (RoekoSeal) or by trituration
(GuttaFlow) before carriage to the canal on a gutta
percha cone, or by passive injection through dedicated Fig. 7. EndoRez expressed from a narrow Navitip
plastic cannulae (Fig. 6). Single gutta percha cones applicator needle.
6
Methods of filling root canals: principles and practices
7
Whitworth
surgery practice have indicated favorable clinical out- has indicated that compaction may reduce canal wall
comes estimated at 94.1% (76, 77), although once contact and seal of materials with insufficiently low
again, independent clinical trial data are not yet minimum film thickness (26).
available.
Cold lateral condensation
Non-Instrumentation Technology Cold lateral condensation is probably the most
The previous section has described the delivery of sealer commonly taught and practiced filling technique
cements by rotary instruments, injection, or carriage on worldwide (35, 36, 80–82) and is regarded as the
points of core material. A highly innovative approach is benchmark against which others must be evaluated.
found in non-instrumentation technology (NIT), The method is generic, encompassing a range of
where the controlled development of a vacuum within approaches in terms of master cone design and
the tooth allows fluid sealer to be drawn into the adaptation, spreader and accessory cone selection,
complexities of the canal system (78). This technology choice of sealer and spreader application. There is little
has been subjected to one clinical trial in which the clear evidence on how it is ‘best’ done (61, 83, 84).
radiographic quality of root fillings with AH 26 was
comparable to that of conventional techniques (79).
Prerequisites
Gutta percha compaction methods Canal preparation
Cold lateral condensation demands a canal which is
Despite the possibilities described, compaction meth- continuously flared from apex to coronal opening (85).
ods continue to dominate clinical endodontics as The superiority of apical stop or tapering control zone
practitioners strive to optimize density of the core preparations for lateral condensation has not been
material and minimize sealer volume. It is not investigated clinically.
established beyond question whether compaction
methods benefit patients or dentists by preserving Spreader selection
health better, healing more disease or demonstrating Condensing tools must be selected and tried into the
more canal complexities. Conversely, they could offer canals before compaction begins. For optimal deforma-
no improvement and risk adverse events such as root tion of material through the length of the canal, a
fracture or more frequent overfill. One in vitro study spreader must be pre-fitted which extends deeply into
Fig. 11. Accessory cones must occupy the space left by the spreader (A & B), otherwise an air or sealer-filled space will
result (C).
8
Methods of filling root canals: principles and practices
the empty canal (86, 87). Hand spreaders encourage Accessory cone selection
higher compaction forces than finger spreaders (88), In order to secure a dense filling, accessory cones must
with the theoretical risk of root flexion or fracture (89). be able to fully occupy the space left by the compacting
Nickel titanium spreaders may penetrate more deeply spreader (Fig. 11). They should therefore be the same
(90, 91), generate less internal stress (92) and size or slightly smaller than the selected spreader (84).
distribute forces more evenly (93), especially in curved Incompatibility will result in the accessory cone
canals. ‘hanging up’ before full insertion, resulting in a cement
Lateral condensation works by vertical loading of the pool at best or a void at worst. In vitro evidence
wedge-shaped spreader to move materials vertically and suggests that tapered gutta percha accessory cones may
laterally. The greater the taper of the spreader, the slide to length more predictably and be more forgiving
greater the lateral component of force. Vertical loads in in the hands of non-specialists than ISO accessory
the range of 1–3 kg have been reported as typical (94), cones (84).
and adequate to deform gutta percha without undue
risks to the tooth (88, 95). Forces associated with Master cone selection
lateral condensation should not be a direct cause of There is no clear evidence whether ISO or unstandar-
vertical root fracture (88). dized cones are preferred. Laboratory investigations
(83, 87) suggest that ISO master cones allowed deeper
spreader penetration and a larger number of accessory
cones to be inserted, although this did not result in a
superior seal against microbial leakage. Unstandardized
cones may be trimmed to provide accurate apical sizing,
and are usually tried in an irrigant-lubricated canal.
Solvent dipping has been shown to improve apical
adaptation and seal of master cones in vitro (96). This is
typically achieved by immersing the apical 2–3 mm of
the master cone in chloroform or halothane for 2 s
before seating it to length in an irrigant-moistened
canal (Fig. 12).
Sealer selection
It is not known which sealer works most effectively with
cold lateral condensation, but clinical evidence suggests
Fig. 12. Chloroform customized master cone. that sealer choice may not have a decisive impact on
Fig. 13. Cold lateral condensation. (A) Condensation and addition of gutta percha cones continues until the spreader
will reach no more than 2–3 mm into the canal. Forces generated by vertical loading of the spreader are vertical and
lateral. (B) Heat severs the gutta percha points and allows consolidation deep into the canal.
9
Whitworth
10
Methods of filling root canals: principles and practices
11
Whitworth
Fig. 18. Warm vertical condensation – multiple wave. Heating and compaction occurs in three or more stages (A–C),
taking an increment of gutta percha from the canal each time and continuing until the apical 4–5 mm are ‘corked’ with
gutta percha and sealer.
12
Methods of filling root canals: principles and practices
Fig. 20. Calamus: engine-driven thermoplastic gutta percha in pre-dispensed cannulae (Courtesy Dentsply).
13
Whitworth
14
Methods of filling root canals: principles and practices
Fig. 22. Warm vertical condensation – single wave. (A) Single wave downpack. (B) Separation and withdrawal. (C)
Apical 4–5 mm ‘corked’ with gutta percha and sealer.
mass of gutta percha, further heating is necessary to Evaluation of warm vertical condensation
release the tip for withdrawal from the canal. The heater Compaction techniques of any sort require dentine
is therefore re-activated, classically by a 1 s ‘separation removal to accommodate condensing instruments and
burst’ before smooth withdrawal. The apical gutta the application of potentially damaging forces in non-
percha mass is then condensed further by hand before physiological directions.
backfilling by any of the methods described previously In warm vertical condensation, opponents have
(16). historically argued that the cost in terms of dentine
15
Whitworth
removal to accommodate appropriate pluggers was heat and pressure to such depths, and in reality, many
excessive compared with that required for lateral con- warm vertically compacted root canal fillings may
densation. This seems to be less of an issue in current comprise of a single, minimally distorted cone in the
practice with controlled canal flaring by contemporary apical few millimeters.
instruments, and a welcome range of sufficiently Warm vertical condensation techniques are designed
narrow and efficient heat carriers, pluggers (including to drive materials into anatomical complexities (16),
nickel titanium pluggers) and backfill needles. but a higher prevalence of sealer extrusion is recognized
Additional concerns have been raised with regard to (109) with potential for further tissue injury and
thermal damage to the periodontal ligament during delayed healing. However, a recent clinical report (160)
thermal compaction techniques, particularly if tem- found no association between sealer extrusion and
perature guidelines are exceeded (149–152). Evidence postoperative pain, whereas small extrusions of zinc
on this appears to be equivocal (153, 154), with most oxide-eugenol sealers have been shown to resorb
of the modeling taking place in the laboratory setting (161). A recent 20–27 year review on teeth with
where the heat-buffering effects of a richly perfused extruded of filling materials showed progressive peri-
periodontium cannot properly be taken into account. apical improvement with time (162).
There is little clinical evidence of adverse periodontal Clinical studies (39, 109, 125, 132) and case reports
responses following thermoplastic obturation in clin- (163, 164) have convincingly reinforced the view that
ical practice. warm vertical condensation techniques can enjoy
Perhaps as important are the questions of efficacy and comparable success to lateral condensation methods.
control. The impact on clinical outcome is central to our choice of
Many laboratory studies have addressed how well techniques, and until recently, there has been little to
warm vertically compacted gutta percha adapts to canal separate established methods. However, data from a recent
walls and reduces sealer-pools following heating and longitudinal study suggests that root canal treatments
compaction to different depths. The consensus of involving minimal apical enlargement and warm vertical
recent laboratory reports is that heating and compac- condensation may be associated with higher successes than
tion within the apical 2–3 mm of the canal is required large apical preparations and cold condensation (165).
for optimal gutta percha adaptation to the canal Whether the filling technique or the overall approach to
terminus (155–159), with significant (30%) differences treatment was critical is hitherto unclear.
in area of canal occupied by gutta percha following heat
application to 2 or 4 mm from canal terminus (157). It
Carrier systems
is difficult to imagine that the majority of practitioners Carrier systems represent another convenient means of
working in curved canals are able to consistently deliver delivering thermally softened gutta percha to canal
Fig. 24. Carrier obturation. (A) Verification of the canal with a blank carrier. (B) Smooth insertion into a lightly sealer-
coated canal. (C) Cut-back of the carrier.
16
Methods of filling root canals: principles and practices
Fig. 25. A Thermafil device prepared for use. Upper device unaltered; lower device trimmed to remove excess gutta
percha apically and coronally.
17
Whitworth
excessive gutta percha in the pulp chamber (16) Two clinical trials have been reported recently.
(Fig. 25). Gagliani et al. (177) have shown 94.9% periapical
It is critical for the development of adequate flow and health in teeth with apical periodontitis, and 48.2%
to facilitate insertion that the device is heated to the healing in teeth without apical periodontitis, 24
correct temperature, and for the required time in the months after treatment with Profile and Thermafil,
manufacturer’s recommended oven. whereas Chu et al. (133) showed comparable, 80%
Sealer application success at 3 yr review in teeth filled with Thermafil or
The insertion of a well-fitting Thermafil device is akin lateral condensation. Lateral condensation was, how-
to inserting the plunger of a syringe to the root canal. ever, found to take 20 min longer on average per tooth
As a consequence, and in contrast to cold lateral than Thermafil.
condensation, where excess sealer will slowly migrate Carrier devices are firmly established in clinical
coronally, excessive sealer application should be practice, and are reported to be especially effective in
avoided to reduce the risk of large-scale apical extru- long, curved canals, where the insertion of conven-
sion. tional spreaders and pluggers may be compromised
Sealer is generally applied sparingly on a paper point, (167).
with the subsequent insertion of further dry paper
points to ensure that excess has been removed and that
there is even, light wall contact (16). Resilon (Fig. 26)
Despite apparently satisfactory performance over many
Carrier insertion decades, and in a variety of guises, gutta percha and
When the carrier is adequately heated, it is removed sealer filling techniques do not represent the universal
from the heater without delay or distraction and ideal. Although few materials, with the exception of
smoothly seated to full working length in one smooth, MTA, have seriously challenged gutta percha and sealer
fluid movement. in the majority of filling situations, research continues
In the hands of skilled and experienced operators, to find alternatives which may seal better, mechanically
the extent of gutta percha and sealer movement reinforce compromised roots, and avoid any potential
can be controlled by the rate of carrier insertion for adverse responses in latex-allergic patients.
(G. Cantatore, personal communication, 2005), and Resilon, a polycaprolactone core and sealer filling
laboratory evidence (170) has suggested that more system has recently entered the market as Real Seal
rapid insertion captures apical detail better than slow (Dentsply, Tulsa, OH, USA), Epiphany (Pentron,
insertion. Wallingfort, CT, USA) and Resilon Simplifill (Light-
Condensation pressure may be applied with a small speed Technologies). Cones of ISO and increased
plugger to compensate for some of the shrinkage which taper, and pellets for injection-molding are available,
inevitably accompanies cooling. The shank may then be with the recommendation that the material can be used
severed with a bur or heated instrument. in any conventional technique. Melting temperatures
Evaluation are, however, reduced to 1501C for System B, and to
Laboratory evidence suggests that Thermafil obtura- 1401C for Obtura (178). Anecdotal reports suggest
tion is a low-pressure technique (171, 172), capable of that the material is user-friendly but does not retain its
rapid, and dense filling of root canal systems and their softness after heating as well as gutta percha. Compo-
ramifications (11, 173–175). nents were developed to bond with each other and with
Periapical extrusion has again been identified as a canal walls to produce an hermetically sealing (19) and
potential drawback of Thermafil (175) and Da Silva et root-reinforcing (18) monobloc of material. Claims on
al. (176) have therefore described a modified carrier the in vitro sealability of Resilon were recently
obturation technique in which a sealer-coated master challenged by independent researchers (178), but
gutta percha cone is first inserted to length before the recent clinical research in dogs has confirmed that
heat-softened carrier. This method has been shown in Resilon provides a better coronal seal against microbial
vitro to create dense root canal fillings while controlling ingress than laterally or vertically compacted gutta
apical extrusion of materials, and presumably, after percha with AH26 (179). Clinical studies in humans
pain. are awaited.
18
Methods of filling root canals: principles and practices
19
Whitworth
canal sealers in vitro. Int Endod J 2004: 37: 41. Gordon MPJ, Love RM, Chandler NP. An evaluation
193–198. of .06 tapered gutta percha cones for filling of .06 taper
25. Nair PN, Henry S, Cano V, Vera J. Microbial status of prepared curved root canals. Int Endod J 2005: 38: 87–
apical root canal system of human mandibular first 96.
molars with primary apical periodontitis after ‘‘one 42. Torabinejad M, Hong CU, McDonald F, Pitt Ford
visit’’ endodontic treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral TR. Physical and chemical properties of a new root-
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005: 99: 231–252. end filling material. J Endod 1995: 21: 349–353.
26. Wu M-K, Özok AR, Wesselink PR. Sealer distribution 43. Whitworth JM, Endal U, Padachey N, Haapasalo M.
in root canals obturated by three techniques. Int 2005 Survey of material selection amongst endodontic
Endod J 2000: 33: 340–345. opinion leaders. Unpublished data.
27. Eguchi DS, Peters DD, Hollinger JO, Lorton L. A 44. Camilleri J, Montesin FE, Brady K, Sweeney R, Curtis
comparison of the area of the canal space occupied by RV, Ford TR. The constitution of mineral trioxide
gutta-percha following four gutta-percha obturation aggregate. Dent Mater 2005: 21: 297–303.
techniques using Procosol sealer. J Endod 1985: 11: 45. Fridland M, Rosado R. Mineral trioxide aggregate
166–175. (MTA) solubility and porosity with different water-to-
28. Wu M-K, Wesselink PR, Boersma J. A 1-year follow-up powder ratios. J Endod 2003: 29: 814–817.
study on leakage of four root canal sealers at different 46. Lee ES. A new mineral trioxide aggregate root-end
thicknesses. Int Endod J 1995: 28: 185–189. filling technique. J Endod 2000: 26: 764–765.
29. Boggia R. A single-visit treatment of septic root canals 47. Whitworth JM, Hunt K. Hunt out your micro
using periapically extruded endomethasone. Br Dent J amalgam gun – an alternative mould for MTA
1983: 155: 300–305. placement. Endod Pract 2005: 8: 17–18.
30. Vranas RN, Hartwell GR, Moon PC. The effect of 48. Lawley GR, Schindler WG, Walker WA III, Kolodru-
endodontic solutions on resourcinol-formaldehyde betz D. Evaluation of ultrasonically placed MTA and
paste. J Endod 2003: 29: 69–72. fracture resistance with intracanal composite resin in a
31. Schwandt NW, Gound TG. Resourcinol-formalde- model of apexification. J Endod 2004: 30:
hyde resin ‘Russian Red’ endodontic therapy. J Endod 167–172.
2003: 29: 435–437. 49. Aminoshariae A, Hartwell GR, Moon PC. Placement
32. Fanibunda K, Whitworth J, Steele J. The management of mineral trioxide aggregate using two different
of thermomechanically compacted gutta percha ex- techniques. J Endod 2003: 29: 679–682.
trusion in the inferior dental canal. Br Dent J 1998: 50. Kratchman SI. Perforation repair and one-step apex-
184: 330–332. ification procedures. Dent Clin North Am 2004: 48:
33. Ørstavik D, Nordahl I, Tibballs JE. Dimensional 291–307.
change following setting of root canal sealer materials. 51. Menezes R, da Silva Neto UX, Carneiro E, Letra A,
Dent Mater 2001: 17: 512–519. Bramante CM, Bernadinelli N. MTA repair of a
34. Ingle JI. A standardised endodontic technique using supracrestal perforation: a case report. J Endod 2005:
newly designed instruments and filling materials. Oral 31: 212–214.
Surg 1961: 14: 83–91. 52. Steinig TH, Regan JD, Gutmann JL. The use and
35. Hommez GMG, De Moor RJG, Braem M. Endodon- predictable placement of mineral trioxide aggregate in
tic treatment preformed by Flemish dentists. Part 2. one-visit apexification cases. Endod Pract 2004: 7:
Canal Filing and decision making for referrals and 15–24.
treatment of apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 2003: 36: 53. Al-Hezaimi K, Naghshbandi J, Oglesby S, Simon JH.,
344–351. Rotstein I. Human saliva penetration of root canals
36. Seccombe GV.. What dentists do and why they do it: a obturated with two types of mineral trioxide aggregate
survey of endodontics in the General Dental Services. cements. J Endod 2005: 31: 453–456.
PhD Thesis, University of Newcastle, UK, 2000. 54. Lertchirakarn V, Timyam A, Messer HH. Effects of
37. Smith CS, Setchell DJ, Harty FJ. Factors influencing root canal sealers on vertical root fracture resistance of
the success of conventional root canal therapy – a five endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 2002: 28:
year retrospective study. Int Endod J 1993: 26: 217–219.
321–333. 55. De Bruyne MAA, De Moor RJG. Review: the use of
38. Wu MK, Fan B, Wesselink PR. Leakage along apical glass ionomer cements in both conventional and
root fillings in curved root canals. Part I: effects of surgical endodontics. Int Endod J 2004: 37: 91–104.
apical transportation on seal of root fillings. J Endod 56. Schäfer E, Zandbiglari T. Solubility of root-canal
2000: 26: 210–216. sealers in water and artificial saliva. Int Endod J 2003:
39. Peters OA, Barbakow F, Peters CI. An analysis of 36: 660–669.
endodontic treatment with three nickel-titanium 57. Carvalho-Junior JR, Guimaraes LF, Correr-Sobrinho
rotary root canal preparation techniques. Int Endod J L, Pecora JD, Sousa-Neto MD. Evaluation of solubi-
2004: 37: 849–859. lity, disintegration, and dimensional alterations of a
40. Buchanan LS. The predefined preparation comes of glass ionomer root canal sealer. Braz Dent J 2003: 14:
age. Endod Prac 2001: 4: 6–18. 114–118.
20
Methods of filling root canals: principles and practices
58. Friedman S, Lost C, Zarrabian M, Trope M. Evalua- 72. Leonardo MR, Salgado AA, da Silva LA, Tanomaru
tion of success and failure after endodontic therapy Filho M. Apical and periapical repair of dogs’ teeth
using a glass ionomer cement sealer. J Endod 1995: 21: with periapical lesions after endodontic treatment with
384–390. different root canal sealers. Braz Oral Res 2003: 17:
59. Bouillaguet S, Wataha JC, Lockwood PE, Galgano C, 69–74.
Golay A, Krejci I. Cytotoxicity and sealing properties 73. Kontakiotis EG, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Effect
of four classes of endodontic sealers evaluated by of sealer thickness on long-term sealing ability:
succinic dehydrogenase activity and confocal laser a 2-year follow-up study. Int Endod J 1997: 30:
scanning microscopy. Eur J Oral Sci 2004: 112: 307–312.
182–187. 74. Whitworth JM, Baco L. Coronal leakage of sealer-only
60. Ardila CN, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Percentage of filled backfill: an in vitro evaluation. J Endod 2005: 31: 280–
canal area in mandibular molars after conventional 282.
root-canal instrumentation and after a noninstrumen- 75. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS.
tation technique (NIT). Int Endod J 2003: 36: 591– The evaluation of apical leakage for three endodontic
598. fill systems. Gen Dent 1998: 46: 618–623.
61. Huumonen S, Lenander-Lumikari M, Sigurdsson A, 76. Musikant BL., Cohen BI, Deutsch AS. A two-and-a-
Ørstavik D. Healing of apical periodontitis after half year perspective on simplified endodontic
endodontic treatment: a comparison between a techniques. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2003: 24:
silicone-based and a zinc oxide-eugenol-based sealer. 46–52.
Int Endod J 2003: 36: 296–301. 77. Deutsch AS, Musikant BL, Cohen BI, Kase D. A study
62. Wu MK, Tigos E, Wesselink PR. An 18-month of one visit treatment usinf EZ-fill root canal sealer.
longitudinal study on a new silicon-based sealer, RSA Endod Pract 2001: 4: 29–36.
RoekoSeal: a leakage study in vitro. Oral Surg Oral 78. Lussi A, Imwinkelreid A, Stich H. Obturation of root
Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002: 94: 499– canals with different sealers using non-instrumenta-
502. tion technology. Int Endod J 1999: 32: 17–23.
63. Zmener O. Tissue response to a new methacrylate- 79. Lussi A, Suter B, Fritzsche A, Gygax M, Portmann P.
based root canal sealer: preliminary observations in the In vivo performance of the new non-instrumentation
subcutaneous connective tissue of rats. J Endod 2004: technology (NIT) for root canal obturation. Int Endod
30: 348–351. J 2002: 35: 352–358.
64. Zmener O, Banegas G, Pameijer CH. Bone tissue 80. Qualtrough AJ., Whitworth JM, Dummer PM. Pre-
response to a methacrylate-based endodontic sealer: a clinical endodontology: an international comparison.
histological and histometric study. J Endod 2005: 31: Int Endod J, 32: 406–414.
457–459. 81. Jenkins SM, Hayes SJ, Dummer PMH. A study of
65. Kardon BP, Kuttler S, Hardigan P, Dorn SO. An in endodontic treatment carried out in dental practice
vitro evaluation of the sealing ability of a new root- within the UK. Int Endod J 2001: 34: 16–22.
canal-obturation system. J Endod 2003: 29: 658–661. 82. Bjrndahl L, Reit C. The adoption of new endodontic
66. Zmener O, Pameijer CH. Clinical and radiographic technology amongst Danish general dental practi-
evaluation of a resin-based root canal sealer. Am J Dent tioners. Int Endod J 2005: 38: 52–58.
2004: 17: 19–22. 83. Bal AS, Hicks ML, Barnett F. Comparison of laterally
67. Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Monticelli F, Weller RN, Breschi condensed .06 and .02 tapered gutta-percha and sealer
L. Effectiveness of resin-coated gutta-percha cones in vitro. J Endod 2001: 27: 786–788.
and dual-cured, hydrophilic methacrylate resin-based 84. Van Gheluwe J, Wilcox LR. Lateral condensation
sealer in obturating root canals. J Endod 2005: 31: of small, curved root canals: comparison of
659–664. two types of accessory cones. J Endod 1996: 22:
68. Kaplan AE, Ormaechea MF, Picca M, Canzobre MC, 540–542.
Ubios AM. Rheological properties and biocompat- 85. Allison DA, Weber CR, Walton RE. The influence of
ibility of endodontic sealers. Int Endod J 2003: 36: the method of canal preparation on the quality of
527–532. apical and coronal obturation. J Endod 1979: 5:
69. Miletić I, Jukić S, Anić I, eljezić D, Garaj-Vrhovac V, 298–304.
Osmak M. Examination of cytotoxicity and mutageni- 86. Allison DA, Michelich RJ, Walton RE. The influence
city of AH26 and AH Plus sealers. Int Endod J 2003: of master cone adaptation on the quality of the apical
36: 330–335. seal. J Endod 1981: 7: 61–65.
70. McMichen FR, Pearson G, Rahbaran S, Gulabivala K. 87. Wilson BL, Baumgartner JC. Comparison of spreader
A comparative study of selected physical properties of penetration during lateral compaction of .04
five root-canal sealers. Int Endod J 2003: 36: and .02 tapered gutta percha. J Endod 2003: 29:
629–635. 828–831.
71. Ørstavik D, Horsted-Bindslev P. A comparison of 88. Lertchirakarn V, Palamara JEA, Messer HH. Load and
endodontic treatment results at two dental schools. strain during lateral condensation and vertical root
Int Endod J 1993: 26: 348–354. fracture. J Endod 1999: 25: 99–104.
21
Whitworth
89. Tamse A. Iatrogenic vertical root fractures in endo- canals using mechanical or traditional lateral conden-
dontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1988: sation. J Endod 2000: 26: 756–759.
4: 190–196. 106. Zmener O, Banegas G. Clinical experience ofcanal
90. Berry KA, Loushine RJ, Primack PD, Runyan DA. filling by ultrasonic condensation of gutta percha.
Nickel-titanium versus stainless-steel finger spreaders Endod Dent Traumatol 1999: 15: 57–59.
in curved canals. J Endod 1998: 24: 752–754. 107. Bailey GC, Ng YL, Cunnington SA, Barber P,
91. Sobhi MB, Khan I. Penetration depth of nickel Gulabivala K, Setchell DJ. Root canal obturation by
titanium and stainless steel finger spreaders in curved ultrasonic condensation of gutta-percha. Part II: an in
root canals. J Coll Phys & Surg – Pakistan 2003: 13: vitro investigation of the quality of obturation. Int
70–72. Endod J 2004: 37: 694–698.
92. Gharai SR, Thorpe JR, Strother JM, McClanahan SB. 108. Tagger M, Tamse A, Katz A, Korzen BH. Evaluation
Comparison of generated forces and apical microleak- of the apical seal produced by a hybrid root canal
age using nickel-titanium and stainless steel finger filling method, combining lateral condensation
spreaders in curved canals. J Endod 2005: 31: 198– and thermatic compaction. J Endod 1984: 10:
200. 299–303.
93. Joyce AP, Loushine RJ, West LA, Runyan DA, 109. Hoskinson SE, Ng Y-L, Hoskinson AE, Moles DR,
Cameron SM. Photoelastic comparison of stress Gulabivala K. A retrospective comparison of outcome
induced by using stainless-steel versus nickel titanium of root canal treatment using two different protocols.
spreaders in vitro. J Endod 1998: 24: 714–715. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
94. Harvey TE, White JT, Leeb IJ. Lateral condens- 2002: 93: 705–715.
ation stress in root canals. J Endod 1991: 7: 110. Ebihara A, Yoshioka T, Suda H. Garrès osteomyelitis
151–155. managed by root canal treatment of a mandibular
95. Dulaimi SF, Wali Al-Hashimi MK. A comparison of second molar: incorporation of computerised tomo-
spreader penetration depth and load required during graphy with 3D reconstruction in the diagnosis and
lateral condensation in teeth prepared using various monitoring of the disease. Int Endod J 2005: 38: 255–
root canal preparation techniques. Int Endod J 2005: 261.
38: 510–515. 111. Tsurumachi T. Endodontic treatment of an invagi-
96. van Zyl SP, Gulabivala K, Ng YL. Effect of customiza- nated maxillary lateral incisor with a periradicular
tion of master gutta-percha cone on apical control of lesion and a healthy pulp. Int Endod J 2004: 37: 717–
root filling using different techniques: an ex vivo 723.
study. Int Endod J 2005: 38: 658–666. 112. ÇaliSkan MK. Prognosis of large cyst-like periapical
97. Waltimo TM, Boiesen J, Eriksen HM, Ørstavik D. lesions following nonsurgical root canal treatment: a
Clinical performance of 3 endodontic sealers. Oral clinical review. Int Endod J 2004: 37: 408–416.
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001: 113. Jung M. Endodontic treatment of dens invaginatus
92: 89–92. type III with three root canals and open apical
98. Kahn FH, Rosenberg PA, Schertzer L, Korthals G, foramen. Int Endod J 2004: 37: 205–213.
Nguyen PNT. An in vitro evaluation of sealer 114. Sedgley CM, Wagner R. Orthograde retreatment an
placement methods. Int Endod J 1997: 30: 181–186. apexification after unsuccessful endodontic treatment,
99. Hall MC, Clement DJ, Dove SB, Walker WA. III A retreatment and apicectomy. Int Endod J 2003: 36:
comparison of sealer placement techniques in curved 780–786.
canals. J Endod 1996: 22: 638–642. 115. Ricucci D, Gröndahl K, Bergenholtz G. Periapical
100. Hoen MM, LaBounty GL, Keller DL. Ultrasonic status in root-filled teeth exposed to the oral environ-
endodontic sealer placement. J Endod 1988: 14: 169– ment by loss of restoration or caries. Oral Surg Oral
174. Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000: 90: 354–
101. Dang DA, Walton RE. Vertical root fracture and root 359.
distortion: effect of spreader design. J Endod 1989: 15: 116. Ricucci D, Bergenholtz G. Bacterial status in root-
294–301. filled teeth exposed to the oral environment by loss of
102. Sakkal S, Weine FS, Lemian L. Lateral condensation: restoration and fracture or caries – a histobacteriolgical
inside view. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1991: 12: study of treated cases. Int Endod J 2003: 36:
796–802. 787–802.
103. Taylor JK, Jeansonne BG, Lemon RR. Coronal 117. Strindberg LZ. The dependence of the results of pulp
leakage: effects of smear layer, obturation technique therapy on certain factors – an analytic study based on
and sealer. J Endod 1997: 23: 508–512. radiographic and clinical follow-up examination. Acta
104. Himel VT, Cain CW. An evaluation of the number of Odont Scand 1956: 14: 1–175.
condenser insertions needed with warm lateral con- 118. Kerekes K, Tronstad L. Long-term results of endo-
densation of gutta percha. J Endod 1993: 19: 79–82. dontic treatment performed with a standardised
105. Gound TG, Riehm RJ, Makkawy HA, Odgaard EC. A technique. J Endod 1979: 5: 83–90.
description of an alternatve method of lateral con- 119. Byström A, Happonen RP, Sjögren U, Sundqvist G.
densation and a comparison of the ability to obdurate Healing of periapical lesions of pulpless teeth after
22
Methods of filling root canals: principles and practices
endodontic treatment with controlled asepsis. Endod 137. Ruddle CJ. Chapter 8: Cleaning and Shaping the Root
Dent Traumatol 1987: 3: 58–63. Canal System. Pathways of the Pulp, 7th edn. St Louis:
120. Ørstavik D, Kerekes K, Eriksen HM. Clinical perfor- Cohen and Burns, 2002: 231–291.
mance of three endodontic sealers. Endod Dent 138. Hülsmann M, Peters OE, Dummer PMH. Mechanical
Traumatol 1987: 3: 178–186. preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques
121. Sjögren U, Hägglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K. and means. Endod Topics 2004: 10: 30–76.
Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic 139. Rosenberg DB. The paper point technique: part one.
treatment. J Endod 1990: 16: 498–504. Endod Pract 2004a: 7: 6–12.
122. Ørstavik D. Time-course and risk analyses of 140. Rosenberg DB. The paper point technique: part two.
the development and healing of chronic apical Endod Prac 2004b: 7: 7–11.
periodontitis in man. Int Endod J 1996: 29: 141. Gutmann J, Witherspoon D. Chapter 9: Obturation of
150–155. the Cleaned and Shaped Root Canal System. Pathways
123. Sjögren U, Figdor D, Persson S, Sundqvist G. of the Pulp, 7th edn. St Louis: Cohen and Burns, 2002:
Influence of infection at the time of root filling on 293–364.
the outcome of endodontic treatment in teeth with 142. Guess GM, Edwards KR, Yang ML, Iqbal MK, Kim S.
apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 1997: 30: 297–306. Analysis of continuous-wave obturation using a single-
124. Oliet S. Single-visit endodontics: a clinical study. J cone and hybrid technique. J Endod 1993: 29: 509–
Endod 1983: 9: 147–152. 512.
125. Pekruhn RB. The incidence of failure following single- 143. DuLac KA, Nielsen CJ, Tomazic TJ, Ferrillo PJ Jr,
visit endodontic therapy. J Endod 1986: 12: 68–72. Hatton JF. Comparison of the obturation of lateral
126. Shah N. Nonsurgical management of periapical canals by six techniques. J Endod 1999: 25: 376–380.
lesions: a prospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral 144. Reader CM, Himel VT, Germain LP, Hoen MM.
Pathol 1988: 66: 365–371. Effect of three obturation techniques on the filling of
127. Cali1kan MK, Sen BH. Endodontic treatment of teeth lateral canals and the main canal. J Endod 1993: 19:
with apical periodontitis using calcium hydroxide: a 404–408.
long-term study. Endod Dent Traumatol 1996: 12: 145. Olson AK, Hartwell GR, Weller RN. Evaluation of the
215–221. controlled placement of injected thermoplasticized
128. Trope M, Delano EO, Ørstavik D. Endodontic gutta-percha. J Endod 1989: 15: 306–309.
treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: single vs 146. Johnson BT, Bond MS. Leakage associated with single
multiple visit treatment. J Endod 1999: 25: 345–350. or multiple increment backfill with the Obtura II
129. Reid RJ, Abbott PV, McNamara JR, Heithersay GS. A gutta-percha system. J Endod 1999: 25: 613–614.
five year study of Hydron root canal fillings. Int Endod 147. Buchanan LS. Continuous wave of condensation
J 1992: 25: 213–220. technique. Endod Pract 1998: 1: 7–23.
130. Weiger R, Rosendahl R, Löst C. Influence of calcium 148. Wu MK, Van Der Sluis LW, Wesselink PR. Fluid
hydroxide intracanal dressings on the prognosis of transport along gutta-percha backfills with and with-
teeth with endodontically induced periapical lesions. out sealer. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral
Int Endod J 2000: 33: 219–226. Radiol Endod 2004: 97: 257–262.
131. Dammascke T, Steven D, Kamp M, Reiner KH. Long- 149. Silver GK, Love RM, Purton DG. Comparison of two
term survival of root-canal-treated teeth: a retro- vertical condensation obturation techniques: touch ‘n
spective study over 10 years. J Endod 2003: 29: 638– heat modified and system B. Int Endod J 1999: 32:
643. 287–295.
132. Friedman S, Abitbol S, Lawrence HP. Treatment 150. Floren JW, Weller RN, Pashley DH, Kimbrough WF.
outcome in endodontics. The Toronto Study. Phase I: Changes in root surface temperatures with in vitro use
initial treatment. J Endod 2003: 29: 787–793. of the System B heat source. J Endod 1999: 25: 593–
133. Chu CH, Lo ECM, Cheung GSP. Outcome of root 595.
canal treatment using Thermafil and cold lateral 151. Villegas JC, Yoshioka T, Kobayashi Ch, Suda H.
condensation filling techniques. Int Endod J 2005: Intracanal temperature rise evaluation during the
38: 179–185. useage of the System B: replication of intracanal
134. Peters LB, Wesselink PR. Periapical healing of anatomy. Int Endod J 2005: 38: 218–222.
endodontically treated teeth in one and two visits 152. Lipski M. Root surface temperature rises during root
obturated in the presence or absence of microorgan- canal obturation in vitro by the continuous wave of
isms. Int Endod J 2002: 35: 660–667. condensation technique using System b heat source.
135. Weine FS, Buchanan LS. Controversies in clinical Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
endodontics: part 1. The significance and filling of 2005: 99: 505–510.
lateral canals. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1996: 17: 153. Romero AD, Green DB, Wucherpfennig AL. Heat
1028–1038. transfer to the periodontal ligament during root
136. Schilder H. Filling root canals in three dimensions. obturation procedures using an in vitro model. J
Dent Clin North Am 1967: 11: 723–744. Endod 2000: 26: 85–87.
23
Whitworth
154. Sweatman TL, Baumgartner JC, Sakaguchi RL. 170. Levitan ME, Himel VT, Luckey JB. The effect of
Radicular temperatures associated with thermoplasti- insertion rates on fill length and adaptation of a
cized gutta-percha. J Endod 2001: 27: 512–515. thermoplasticised gutta percha technique. J Endod
155. Wu MK, van der Sluis LW, Wesselink PR. A 2003: 29: 505–508.
preliminary study of the percentage of gutta-percha- 171. Blum JY, Machtou P, Micallef JP. Analysis of forces
filled area in the apical canal filled with vertically developed during obturations. Wedging effect: part II.
compacted warm gutta-percha. Int Endod J 2002: 35: J Endod 1998: 24: 223–228.
527–535. 172. Saw LH., Messer HH. Root strains associated with
156. Bowman CJ, Baumgartner JC. Gutta-percha obtura- different obturation techniques. J Endod 1995: 21:
tion of lateral grooves and depressions. J Endod 2002: 314–320.
28: 220–223. 173. Jarrett IS, Marx D, Covey D, Karmazin M, Lavin M,
157. Jung IY, Lee SB, Kim ES, Lee CY, Lee SJ. Effect of Gound T. Percentage of canals filled in apical cross
different temperatures and penetration depths of a sections – an in vitro study of seven obturation
System B plugger in the filling of artificially created techniques. Int Endod J 2004: 37: 392–398.
oval canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral 174. Gencoglu N. Comparison of 6 different gutta-percha
Radiol Endod 2003: 96: 453–457. techniques (part II): Thermafil, JS Quick-Fill, Soft
158. Villegas JC, Yoshioka T, Kobayashi C, Suda H. Three- Core, Microseal, System B, and lateral condensation.
step versus single-step use of system B: evaluation of Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
gutta-percha root canal fillings and their adaptation to 2003: 96: 91–95.
the canal walls. J Endod 2004: 30: 719–721. 175. Clinton K, Van Himel T. Comparison of a warm gutta-
159. Kececi AD, Unal GC, Sen BH. Comparison of cold percha obturation technique and lateral condensation.
lateral compaction and continuous wave of obturation J Endod 2001: 27: 692–695.
techniques following manual or rotary instrumenta- 176. Da Silva D, Endal U, Reynaud A, Portenier I, Orstavik
tion. Int Endod J 2005: 38: 381–388. D, Haapasalo M. A comparative study of lateral
160. Ng Y-L, Glennon JP, Setchell DJ, Gulabivala K. condensation, heat-softened gutta-percha, and a
Prevalence and factors affecting post-obturation pain modified master cone heat-softened backfilling tech-
in patients undergoing root canal treatment. Int nique. Int Endod J 2002: 35: 1005–1011.
Endod J 2004: 37: 381–391. 177. Gagliani MA, Cerutti A, Bondesan A, Colombo M,
161. Ausburger RA, Peters DD. Radiographic evaluation of Godio E, Giacomelli G. A 24-month survey on root
extruded obturation materials. J Endod 1990: 10: canal treatment performed by NiTi engine driven files
492–497. and warm gutta-percha filling associated system.
162. Fristad I, Molven O, Halse A. Nonsurgically retreated Minerva Stomatol 2004: 53: 543–554.
root filled teeth – radiographic findings after 20–27 178. Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Kimbrough WF,
years. Int Endod J 2004: 37: 12–18. Pashley DH, Mak Y-F, Lai C-NS, Raina R, Williams
163. Stefen H, Splieth C. Conventional treatment of dens MC. Ultratructural evaluation of the apical
invaginatus in maxillary lateral incisor with sinus tract: seal in roots filled with a polycaprolactone-based
one year follow-up. J Endod 2005: 31: 130–133. root canal filling material. J Endod 2005: 31:
164. Nallapati S. Three canal mandibular first and second 514–519.
premolars: a treatment approach. A case report. J 179. Shipper G, Teixeira FB, Arnold RR, Trope M.
Endod 2005: 31: 474–476. Periapical inflammation after coronal microbial inocu-
165. Farazaneh M, Abitbol S, Lawrence HP, Friedman S. lation of dog roots filled with gutta-percha or resilon. J
Treatment outcome in endodontics – the Toronto Endod 2005: 31: 91–96.
study. Phase II: initial treatment. J Endod 2004: 30: 180. Lewsey JD, Gilthorpe MS, Gulabivala K. An introduc-
302–309. tion to meta-analysis within the framework of multi-
166. Johnson WB. A new gutta-percha technique. J Endod level modelling using the probability of success of root
1978: 4: 184–188. canal treatment as an illustration. Commun Dent
167. Cantatore G. Thermafil versus System B. Endod Pract Health 2001: 18: 131–137.
2001: 5: 30–39. 181. Ferguson DB, Kjar KS, Hartwell GR. Three canals in
168. Behnia A, McDonald NJ. In vitro infrared thermo- the mesiobuccal root of a maxillary first molar: a case
graphic assessment of root surface temperatures report. J Endod 2005: 31: 400–402.
generated by the thermafil plus system. J Endod 182. De Moor RJG, Calberson FLG. Root canal treatment
2001: 27: 203–205. in a mandibular second premolar with three canals. J
169. Buchanan LS. ProSystem GT: design, technique, and Endod 2005: 31: 310–313.
advantages. Endod Topics 2005: 10: 168–175.
24