No name not belonging to any of the partners or associates may be used in the firm name for any
purpose. - PP v. Gonzalez, Jr., G.R. No. 139542 June 10, 2003
Negligence of clerks in
a law firm
Time and again the Court has admonished law firms to adopt a system of distributing pleadings
and notices, whereby lawyers working therein receive promptly notices and pleadings intended for
them, so that they will always be informed of the status of their cases.
Their Court has also often repeated that the negligence of clerks which adversely affect the cases
handled by lawyers, is binding upon the latter. - B.R. Sebastian Enterprises, Inc. v. CA, G.R. No. L-
41862 [1992]
Rule 18.04 - A lawyer shall keep the client informed of the status of his case and shall respond
within a reasonable time to the client's request for information.
Lawyer who has had “significant personal contacts”
A departing lawyer who has had “significant personal contacts” with the client, should inform the
client that the lawyer is leaving the firm.
Note: this does not mean that an associate who met a client once or twice and has prepared
discovery requests has had “significant personal contacts” – the standard is that if the client were
asked “which lawyer(s) at the firm represents you?” the lawyers mentioned would be those that
have had“significant personal contacts.”
Ethical obligations of
departing lawyers
In addition to the ethical obligations departing lawyers have, they also must avoid interfering with
the contracts the firm has with existing clients.
However, the caution to avoid stealing clients must be balanced against the departing lawyer’s
ethical obligation to notify clients that an attorney is departing.
The client has the option of going with the lawyer, staying with the firm, or getting a new firm
How any advance fee deposit will be treated
A place for the client to sign and return the letter, with instructions on where their file should go.
Separate letters may be sent by the lawyer (or the firm) to clients with whom the departing lawyer
had substantial personal contact as long as:
1) the letters do not disparage the firm or the lawyer; and
2) the letters do not involve improper solicitation
But can a departing lawyer keep all of a contingent fee case that came into
the old firm but ultimately settled when the lawyer was at a new firm?
Probably not, according to several cases.
A lawyer may be entitled to only his partnership portion of the fees earned on a case, even if he
performed most of the work after the dissolution of the firm.
Nevertheless, some courts will find that when a lawyer leaves a firm and takes a case with him, he
may be entitled to the quantum meruit value of the work he performed.
Phones
It is ethically inappropriate to have the receptionist tell callers who are looking for a lawyer who
recently left the firm “we don’t know where he is.” That game is not professional and not
acceptable.
Assure that all staff are instructed to provide the departed lawyer’s phone number and mailing
address.
Also, assign a partner to answer any client inquiries.
Moreover, mail should be forwarded to the departed lawyer.
WON the firm of “Velasquez, Rodriguez, Respicio, Ramos, Nidea, and Prado”may call itself “A law
Firm Of St. Thomas More and Associate Members”.
It implies that St. Thomas More is a Law Firm when in fact it is not it would also convey to the
public the impression that the lawyers are members of the law firm which does not exist. To the
public, it would seem that the purpose or intention of adding “The Law Firm of St. Thomas More
and Associates Members” is to bask in the name of a Saint, although that may not really, be the
purpose or intention of the lawyers. The appellation only tends to confuse the public and in a way
demean both the saints and the legal profession whose members must depend on their own name
and record and merit and not on the name/glory of other persons living or dead. - PP v. Gonzalez,
Jr., G.R. No. 139542 June 10, 2003
There is no question that Atty. Bragas has knowledge of Atty. Era's suspension from the practice of
law and yet, she allowed herself to participate in Atty. Era's unauthorized practice. Clearly, Atty.
Bragas violated the CPR, specifically:
CANON 9 - A lawyer shall not, directly or indirectly, assist in the unauthorized practice of law.
Being an associate in Atty. Era's law firm cannot be used to circumvent the suspension order. The
factual circumstances of the case clearly shows that Atty. Bragas did not act to replace Atty. Era as
counsel for his and/or the law firm's clients during the latter's suspension. Atty. Bragas merely
assisted Atty. Era, who admittedly was the one actively performing all acts pertaining to the labor
case he was handling. - Bonifacio v. Atty. Era & Atty Bragas, A.C. No. 11754, October 03, 2017
It behooves the law firm to value coordination in deference to the conflict of interest rule
As the Court observes, the law firm's unethical acceptance of the criminal case arose from its
failure to organize and implement a system by which it would have been able to keep track of all
cases assigned to its handling lawyers to the end of, among others, ensuring that every
engagement it accepts stands clear of any potential conflict of interest. As an organization of
individual lawyers which, albeit engaged as a collective, assigns legal work to a corresponding
handling lawyer, it behooves the law firm to value coordination in deference to the conflict of
interest rule.
…….
This lack of coordination, as respondents' law firm exhibited in this case, intolerably renders its
clients' secrets vulnerable to undue and even adverse exposure, eroding in the balance the lawyer-
client relationship's primordial ideal of unimpaired trust and confidence.
Had such system been institutionalized, all of its members, Atty. Dionela included, would have
been wary of the above-mentioned conflict, thereby impelling the firm to decline FEVE Farms'
subsequent engagement. Thus, for this shortcoming, herein respondents, as the charged members
of the law firm, ought to be administratively sanctioned.
The complainants did not present any evidence that Atty. Jarder was directly involved, had
knowledge of, or even participated in the wrongful practice of Atty. Bancolo in allowing or
tolerating his secretary to sign pleadings for him. Thus, we agree with the finding of the IBP Board
that Atty. Jarder is not administratively liable. - Rodrigo E. Tapay and Anthony J. Rustia v. Atty.
Charlie L. Bancolo and Atty. Janus T. Jarder, A.C. No. 9604, March 20, 2013