Anda di halaman 1dari 2

CRIMINAL LAW  Mens Rea

- branch of law that defines crimes, treats of their nature and - mens: mental (concede in the mind), rea: evil/bad
provides for their punishment - “evil mind”
 “Nullum crimen nulla poena sine lege” - regardless of the intention it should still be punished (penalty
- there is no crime where there is no law punishing it may be reduced or increased)
- when an act is not defined as a crime it will not be punished o Intent (modification)
 Elements that constitute a crime 1. error in personae – mistaken identity/ no effect/ can change
o treats of their nature – principles the penalty depending on the situation
o penalty should be clear 2. praeter intentionem – intended act produced a different
 Three Fundamental Principles of Criminal Law result
1. Generality – who are criminally liable 3. aberratio ictus – mistake in blow(attack)
- criminal law of the country governs all persons within the - “A wrongful act done by me against my will is not my act” –
country regardless of their race, belief, sex or creed threatened (Art. 11 Justifying Circumstances)
(exceptions: ambassadors, chiefs of states, diplomatic  Proximate Cause – the act is not the immediate cause
officials, treaties, stipulations) - “The cause of the cause of the evil caused is the cause of
2. Territoriality – where was the crime committed the evil caused.”
- the penal laws of the country have force and effect only - that cause which in natural and continuous sequence
within its territory unbroken by any efficient intermining cause produces the
3. Prospectivity – when was the act committed injury and without which the result would not have occurred
- act or omissions will only be subject to a penal law if they - Doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitur – thing speaks for itself
are committed after a penal law had already taken effect  Intent is different from motive.
 Doctrine of In Dubio Pro Reo  Motive – moving power which impels one to action for a
- “When in doubt, for the accused.” definite result
- a defendant may not be convicted by the court when a o proving a crime:
doubt about his/her guilt exists (innocent until proven guilty) 1. can’t identify the accused
o factual doubt – circumstances, evidences/ accused must be 2. there is no eyewitness
acquitted/ proof beyond reasonable doubt (heaviest 3. evidence presented are merely circumstantial
quantum evidence)  Intent – the purpose to use a particular means to effect such
o legal doubt – two or more interpretations of the law/ decides result
in favor of the accused (guilt is establish by the prosecution) o Mala In Se
 Void-for-Vagueness Doctrine – void or unenforceable when it is - intent is relevant
too vague for an average person to understand - usually crimes defined under RPC
 Equipoise Doctrine – evidence of the prosecution and the - wrong in nature (adultery, murder, robbery, perjury)
defense are evenly balanced, there will be tilting of the scales o Mala Prohibita
in favor of the accused - intent is not important
 Ex Post Facto Law – law that retroactively changes the legal - mostly from Special Penal Laws
consequences of actions that were committed or relationships - wrong because the law prohibits it (RA 9165, jaywalking)
that existed, before the enactment of law  Impossible Crime
 Bill of Attainder – legislative act that single out an individual or a - act which would be an offense against persons or property,
group without trial were it not for the inherent impossibility of its accomplishment
 Miranda Doctrine – specific right of any person of any person or an account of the employment of inadequate or
who is taken into police custody is entitled to ineffectual means
 Sources of Criminal Law - ex. poisoning, intention of killing but failed (A Menor)
1. Act 3815 (Jan. 1, 1932) Article 5
2. Special Penal Laws - there is an act that the judges think is punishable but it is really
3. Philippine Jurisprudence not punishable
4. Ordinances - recommendation to the Congress to modify an act
Article 6: Felony
Article 1: Time when Act takes effect  consummated – successful in committing the crime
 RPC – prospectivity  frustrated – failed to accomplish the crime
Article 2: Application of its provisions  attempted – performed act but not all the elements are present
 International agreements Article 7
- 1st paragraph: generality  Light felonies are punishable only when they have been
- 1-5: territoriality consummated. (Aresto Menor)
- (1) ship or airship, (2) fake money (4) public officer Article 8
committed a crime that is part of his duty  Conspiracy – two or more persons come to an agreement
Article 3 concerning the commission of a felony and decide to do it
 Acts – things that you do  Proposal – the person who has decided to commit a felony
 Omissions – things that you ought to do but you did not do proposes its execution to some other person/s
 Dolo – intentional act  it can become a crime = treason
- Deceit: freedom, intelligence, intent to do that act Article 9
 Culpa – acts done by means of fault  Grave Felonies – law attaches capital punishment or penalties
- imprudence, lack of foresight, lack of skill, negligence which in any of their periods afflictive
Article 4: Criminal liability
 Less Grave Felonies – law punishes with penalties which in their Article 14: Aggravating Circumstances
maximum period are correctional - add/increase the penalty, against the accused (maximum)
 Light Felonies – law for the commission of which the penalty of  Qualifying Aggravating Circumstance – changes the nature of
aresto menor or a fine not exceeding to 200 or both the crime (ex. Art. 248 & 249 – Murder and Homicide)
Article 10 - Homicide (RTemporal) simple act of killing + QAC = Murder
- offense in the future punishable by special laws are not subject (RPerpetual-Death) who not falling within Art 246
to this Code - QAC of Murder: treachery, taking advantage of superior
- this Code shall be supplementary to such laws strength, inconsideration
- unless latter should specially provide the contrary 1. took advantage of the position (except: when it is already a
Article 11: Justifying Circumstances (D3EDO) crime- inherent)
- eliminates liability 2. insult to the public authority – inherent direct assault, Art. 148
- no criminal and civil liability 3. rank, age, sex, dwelling of the offended (except: house if for
1. self-defense business establishment/ inherent: trespassing, robbery)
a. unlawful aggression (actual or eminent) 4. ungratefulness
b. reasonable necessity, means employed to prevent or repel it 5. committed in the palace, with the presence of the Chief
c. lack of sufficient provocation on the part of the person Executive, public authorities, inside the Church
defending himself (it is not you who provoked the act 6. night time, uninhabited place, band (more than 3 armed
2. defense of a relative – provocation came from you (spouse, malefactor – a person w/ the intention of committing bad act)
ascendants, descendants, legitimate, illegitimate, adopted, 7. committed a crime during a calamity of misfortune
consanguinity, fourth civil degree) 8. defenseless victim
3. defense of stranger – there should be no revenge, resentment 9. Recidivist – previously convicted with the same crime
or evil motive 10. Reiteracion – have been convicted, two crimes with different
4. avoidance of evil – an evil is about to happen and you tried to penalty
avoid but still committed a crime/ civilly liable 11. there is a price, reward or promise
a. evil existed 12. involves great waste and ruin
b. injury will be greater 13. evident premeditation – there was a span of time wherein you
c. no means of preventing it planned the commission of that offense
5. duty – fulfillment of their duty 14. craft – trickery; fraud; disguise – concealed identity
6. order – order of the superior and you are absolutely bound to 15. advantage be taken of superior strength
obey that order 16. alevosia (treachery) – crime against a person (backstabbing)/
Article 12: Exempting Circumstances frontal attack, surprised attack
- there is a crime but there is no criminal 17. ignominy – bring insult or humiliation upon the victim (ex. killed
- no criminal liability but has civil liability in front of a child) more evil than the original crime
1. insanity – payment of damage is from properties/ it should be 18. unlawful entry
proven with legal grounds that do not have the freedom in 19. trespassed and committed a crime
doing a certain act 20. used minors in doing a crime
 imbecile – who has the mind of a child/ treated like a minor 21. augmented – made worse/ cruelty
2. minority Article 15: Alternative Circumstances
3. beyond 9 to 15 – discernment – ability to determine what is right - either increase or reduce penalty
from what is wrong/ commit to proper authorities  relationship – crime against a relative (obvious ungratefulness)
 RA9344 – 15 beyond, 18 below is exempted from criminal  intoxication – habitual drinker committed a crime
liability - RA9262 – intoxication is not an excuse
- acted with discernment – diversion program - got drunk, intent has been diminished (Mitigating)
- acted without discernment – intervention program  degree of instruction and education – finished a high and
4. accident – prove that you are acting with due care, that committed a crime, used it as an advantage (low degree:
everything is an accident/ no civil liability mitigating)
5, 6, 7 – compelling force (acted against my will) Other circumstances that affects criminal liability:
Article 13: Mitigating Circumstances  Article 247 – destierro – exempt the spouse from criminal liability,
- reduces penalty (medium punishment) protection for the victim-suspect
a. Privileged Mitigating – lowers the penalty by one degree  Seducer
b. Ordinary Circumstance – contribute in adjusting the penalty to  Public Act 9262 – Battered Woman Syndrome (JC)
its minimum period - psychological disorder/ repeated violence
1. self-defense – missing element except unlawful aggression 1. Tension-building Phase
2. RA9344, 70 years old – humanitarian reasons 2. Acute Battering Phase
3. praeter intentionem 3. Tranquil Phase
4. provoked, revenge - happened twice, third with BWS = justified from criminal liability
5. revenge for the relative – act committed against your relative
and you wanted to avenge them
6. act committed because of impulse or was triggered
7. voluntary surrender – saves the money of the government
8. defect related to crime (deaf, dumb, blind)
9. illness
10. any circumstances that can qualify

Anda mungkin juga menyukai