Key Information
Course Organiser Dr. Stephen Hill
Email: stephen.hill@ed.ac.uk
Room no. 3.01
Chrystal MacMillan Building, 15A George Square
Guidance & Feedback Hours: Tues. 2-4pm
Contents
Lectures
There are two 50-minute lectures every week:
Lectures will introduce and explore key concepts, theories, and ways to analyse politics
and international relations.
Tutorials
Tutorials provide an opportunity for you to discuss your own ideas and your reaction
to the readings and lectures. The tutors will also assist you in the organisation of your
essay and preparation for the exam at the end of the year.
The first tutorial will provide you with essentials about the program and procedures for
the rest of the course, and it is therefore all the more important that you do not miss it.
You are required to do the readings and prepare for each tutorial in advance. A list of
tutors and contact email addresses will be made available on Learn during the first
week of teaching.
Please note that pressure of work or problems of time management are not
considered an acceptable reason for non-attendance at tutorials or for late
submission of work.
All the skills we study on this course are directly relevant to your assessed work. They
are designed to give you opportunity to work on individual skills in a structured way,
with feedback from others, in order to help you understand the standards required of
students, and also the techniques that can help you attain those standards more easily.
Word count
limit
Do not exceed Return of
Assessment Weighting Submission date
the word limit feedback
or penalties
will be applied
Note: All coursework is submitted electronically through ELMA. Please read the School
Policies and Coursework Submission Procedures which you will find here.
Your overall course mark is derived by weighting each component as specified and
calculating an average. To pass the course, you need to achieve a mark of at least 40
for the course overall and pass the exam (min. mark of 40).
ESSAY
You must answer one of the questions from the options below. Your essay should be
no more than 1500 words in length. In text references are included in the word-
count; the title and bibliography are not included. You must provide a word count.
Your essay work will cover the first part of the course – that is, all the essay titles reflect
topics discussed up to the end of Week 6. The essay is due on 29 October at noon.
Essay Options
Answer one of the following questions, using academic references (clearly indicate on
your essay which option you have chosen):
Option D: Is the UK’s political party system no longer serving the public
interest?
Essay Assessment
The essay is marked by your tutor. The course organiser will second-read a sample of
essays from each tutorial group to ensure equal marking standards across tutorial
groups. The following are the criteria through which the Essay will be marked. It is
important to note that the overall mark is a result of a holistic assessment of the
assignment as a whole.
Does the essay address the question set, and with sufficient focus?
Does the essay show a grasp of the relevant concepts and knowledge?
Does the essay demonstrate a logical and effective pattern of argument?
Does the essay support arguments with relevant, accurate and effective forms
of evidence?
Does the essay demonstrate critical thinking in relation to arguments and
evidence?
Is the essay adequately presented in terms of: correct referencing and quoting,
spelling, grammar and style, layout and visual presentation?
Please note – Footnotes and Endnotes are included in the word count of the essay!!
(the bibliography is not)
Coursework is submitted online using our electronic submission system, ELMA. You
will not be required to submit a paper copy of your work. Marked coursework, grades
and feedback will be returned to you via ELMA. You will not receive a paper copy of
your marked course work or feedback.
EXAM
The exam comprises 60% of your overall mark and consists of two sections; you must
answer one question in each section. There will be several options in each section. The
exam lasts 2 hours. It will take place during the 2018 December exam diet.
IPIR exam questions of previous years are attached to this course guide (Appendix 6).
Past exam papers from earlier years can also be found via the main library's homepage
at http://www.lib.ed.ac.uk.
To pass IPIR, students must gain a passing average in the exam and a passing
average overall. The pass mark for coursework and the examination is 40. For those
failing or missing the exam, a resit examination is held in mid/late August 2019. It is
the student's responsibility to check the resit timetable on the Registry's website
[http://www.registry.ed.ac.uk/], find the time and location of the resit exam, and ensure
they are present for that resit. No formal registration is necessary and students will not
be individually notified of the resit date and location.
This is the ONLY email address we shall use to communicate with you. Please note
that we will NOT use ‘private’ email addresses such as Yahoo or Hotmail; it is therefore
essential that you check your university email regularly, preferably each day.
If you have any concerns, they should be taken first of all to your tutor. The easiest time
to see your tutor is just before or after a tutorial. Tutors can also be contacted via email.
More serious personal problems are best dealt with by your Personal Tutor or Student
Support Officer, who will let us know, for example, if you have been ill or, for some other
serious reason, unable to keep up with the work for part of the course.
Administrative problems to do with the course can usually be dealt with by your tutor,
but you may, if necessary, consult with the Course Organiser, Dr Stephen Hill
(stephen.hill@ed.ac.uk), e.g. about problems to do with tutorial teaching.
There are various avenues for you to provide us with feedback about the course:
• At the end of each section, some tutorial time will be given over to feedback
sessions on various aspects of the course, and the tutors will pass on your
comments to the course organiser.
• We will ask each tutorial group to elect a tutorial representative. Some of the
tutorial reps will become the class representatives (their names and contact
addresses will be posted on the Introduction to Politics and International
Relations Learn page) serving on the Staff-Student Liaison Committee. The
Staff-Student Liaison Committee meets to discuss students’ ideas about the
teaching of the course. Make sure you know who your own tutorial group
representative is.
• At the end of the course, we ask all students to fill in a questionnaire about the
various lecture blocks and other aspects of the course. We do hope you will
take note of what you like and dislike as the course progresses, and that you
then take the time to share your experience with us. We do our best to include
your constructive suggestions into the program for subsequent years.
Course Textbook
There is ONE required course textbook for IPIR, which you are expected to buy. It
is a customised book that has been produced especially for this course and contains
a collection of chapters from various Politics and International Relations textbooks.
You can purchase the book at:
Blackwell’s Edinburgh
We have placed several key readings on e-reserve, which means they are available to
you electronically in the resource list and/or through the IPIR LEARN page (not through
the library catalogue). These works are clearly indicated on the reading list as ‘e-
reserve’ readings. You need only click on the link in the resource list or in LEARN (in
the e-reserve folder) to access the assigned reading. The university had to acquire
additional copyrights for these readings to make them available to you electronically
and this is only possible in a pass-worded space like the resource list or LEARN.
The further reading material for this course is found in books, journals, newspapers
and political weeklies, as well as in official publications and internet sites. Almost all
of this material is available in the Main University Library in George Square, or
through its electronic catalogue “DiscoverED” (www.lib.ed.ac.uk/lib/).
There are some further texts that are recommended for this course – that is, they will
prove useful throughout the course and occasionally chapters from them will be listed
as ‘required’ or ‘recommended reading’. If you plan to continue studying Politics or
IR they will also be useful in subsequent years.
• Baylis, J., S. Smith and P. Owens (2014) (eds), The Globalization of World Politics,
6th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press. Also check out their Companion Website
for this book http://global.oup.com/uk/orc/politics/intro/baylis6e/
• Brown, C. and K. Ainley (2009) Understanding International Relations.
Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Devetak, R., A. Burke and J. George (2012) Introduction to International Relations,
2nd ed., Cambridge: CUP.
• Harrison, L., A. Little and E. Lock (2015) Politics: Key Concepts. London:
Routledge.
• Heywood, A. (2014) Global Politics, (2nd ed.) Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Heywood, A. (2013) Politics, 4th ed.. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Jackson, R.J. (2013) Global Politics in the 21st Century. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
• Kegley Jr., C. and G. Raymond (2010) The Global Future: A Brief Introduction to
World Politics, International edition (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage.
• Leftwich, A. (ed.) (2004) What is Politics?: the Activity and its Study , Oxford : Polity.
• Marshall, T. (2015) Prisoners of Geography. Ten Maps that tell you everything you
need to know about Global Politics. Elliott & Thompson. (e-book in library)
• Runciman, D. (2013) The Confidence Trap: A History of Democracy in Crisis from
World War One to the Present. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
• Smith, S., A. Hadfield and T. Dunne (eds) (2012) Foreign Policy, 2nd edition. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
• Stoker, G. (2007) Why Politics Matters: Making Democracy Work, Basingstoke:
Palgrave. (e-book in library)
Several useful journals are ‘e-journals’ which means articles from them can be directly
downloaded through the library’s website. Under ‘simple search’, type in the name of
the journal and the listing will indicate if the journal is available electronically.
Sometimes older issues of journals are available via JSTOR. These are also listed in
the library catalogue. Journals available electronically and relevant for this course
include:
British Journal of Political Science; Comparative Politics; Comparative Political
Studies; Democratization; the Economist; Foreign Affairs, Foreign Policy,
Government and Opposition; International Affairs, International Security, Journal
of Democracy; Journal of Politics; Parliamentary Affairs; Political Quarterly,
Political Studies, Politics, and West European Politics. For reports on specific
events or elections, Facts on File and Keesing's Record of World Events are
valuable data sources.
Please note that these links require an internet connection and some may require
‘EASE logon’ or have to be accessed from a computer within the university network.
To learn more about gaining off-campus access to these resources consult the
following website: http://www.lib.ed.ac.uk/resources/shibboleth.html
Newspapers
One of the best ways of keeping abreast of current political developments is by careful
reading of newspapers and periodicals. We recommend you go well beyond checking
the BBC news website as their coverage tends to be incomplete and selective. Try to
read a quality daily to keep up with how politics and IR evolve on a daily basis. The
library also receives several relevant foreign newspapers.
For a weekly review, see the Economist which offers a succinct, readable (if
sometimes contentious) weekly account of political and economic developments. The
Economist also issues a weekly summary of world events, Politics this Week,
accessible at its website (http://www.economist.com) and also distributed by email.
To develop critical arguments, please also make use of alternative news services
such as the one provided by Educate Inspire Change
http://educateinspirechange.org/category/alternative-news/.
If you cannot locate a reading listed in this course handbook, please notify the
course organiser (stephen.hill@ed.ac.uk) or the course senior tutor
(lzatsepi@exseed.ed.ac.uk). Make sure, however, that you have looked properly
first.
Thursday 20 September (2) Doing Politics & International Relations (Dr. Hill)
Study Skills 3: Effective Reading and Critical Engagement with Academic Texts
7 Tutorial 6: Power
Exam preparation
Thursday 22 November (20) Revision Lecture (Dr. Hill)
NOTE: All “required readings” are to be read BEFORE the relevant lecture. Most
“required” readings will be available in the IPIR custom textbook that you are
expected to buy. All other “required readings” are available to you electronically
either as “e-reserve” (on the LEARN page) or through the course resource list, or as
a general electronic source (i.e. search title from within the university network using
Google Scholar or search the University Library’s “DiscoverED”).
Email the convenor (stephen.hill@ed.ac.uk) or the course senior tutor
(lzatsepi@exseed.ed.ac.uk) instantly if you cannot locate the “required readings”.
Lecture 1: Welcome
This lecture provides an overview of the course, its learning objectives, mode of
assessment, content and structure.
Required reading:
Garner, R. (2012) ‘Introduction: The Nature of Politics and Political Analysis’, in Garner,
R., P. Ferdinand and S. Lawson (eds) Introduction to Politics (2nd ed.). Oxford: OUP,
1-23. [e-reserve on LEARN]
Stoker, G. (2007) Why Politics Matters. Basingstoke: Palgrave. [custom textbook –
chapter 1]
This lecture deals with some of the fundamental questions underlying the study of
Politics and International Relations. Is IR a sub-discipline of Politics, or are they
separate (yet closely linked) disciplines that share a wealth of perspectives and
philosophical puzzles? What are we trying to do as political analysts? Why do we need
theories or ideologies? What levels of analysis are we looking at – the state, the
international system, society, the individual? Are real life events determined by human
action (agency) or are there systemic determinants and constraints (structure) that
make humans do what they do? What is the nature of the world we are studying
(ontology)? How might we study it (epistemology)? In this lecture we will discuss these
abstract questions using a number of examples from Politics and IR.
Required reading:
Savigny, H. and L. Marsden (2011) Doing Politics and International Relations. London:
Palgrave, Introduction and chapter 1 (‘Themes and Issues in Political Science and
International Relations’), 1-42. [custom textbook – chapters 2 and 3]
This lecture will introduce the concept of the state. In modern political life, the state is
the primary arena for the exercise of political power. We will look at different definitions
of the state and consider its key features and functions. In particular, we will study the
state as the basis of sovereignty and legitimate authority. We will examine the
emergence and development of the state and look at the different types of states that
are evident today. Finally, we will consider the internal and external pressures on the
modern state, especially those that can lead to decreasing legitimacy and even state
failure.
Required reading:
Heywood, A. (2013) ‘Politics and the State’ (chapter 3), in Heywood, A. Politics (4th
ed.) Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 56-79. [custom textbook – chapter 4]
Poggi, G. (2011) ‘The Nation-State’, in D. Caramani (ed.) Comparative Politics (2nd ed.)
Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 67-84. [resource list and e-reserve on
LEARN]
What is globalization and how is it affecting the modern state system? This lecture and
accompanying readings analyse the features and impact of globalization, including the
changing role of the state, the rise of transnational corporations, changes to the global
economy, and globalization’s impact on trade. Particular attention is paid to the forces
driving globalization and the actors that seem to be playing a more active role in a
‘globalized’ international system. This lecture also looks at the arguments opposing
globalization. Students are encouraged to think about whether globalization is a new
phenomenon, and whether its effects are as negative as are commonly portrayed.
Required reading:
Heywood, A. (2014) ‘Introducing Global Politics’ (chapter 1), Global Politics (2nd ed.)
Basingstoke: Palgrave, 1-24. [custom textbook – chapter 5]
McGrew, A. (2014) ‘Globalization and Global Politics’, Baylis, J., S. Smith and P.
Owens (eds) The Globalization of World Politics (6th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University
Press, 15-31. [resource list and e-reserve on LEARN]
Exercise:
• Take a photo of something
`political’ on a camera or mobile
and bring it to class.
Ideology maybe one of the most elusive and controversial concepts in the whole of
social science. It is a term now used most commonly to refer to a more-or-less
coherent set of ideas that provide a basis for organised political action. Ideological
debates are therefore fascinating manifestations of the diversity of human imagination.
This lecture will examine some of the most prominent ideologies by looking at their
origins and development. As will become clear, ideologies draw on a rich history of
political theory and each one seeks to apply the `lessons of history’ it perceives to the
present. The historical dynamics behind the rise and fall of these rival ideologies will
also be covered. Perhaps the age of ideologies has now passed. Or is it just that
traditional ideologies are becoming irrelevant and the world is now entering a new era
of collective ideas such as environmentalism and green politics?
Required reading:
Heywood, A. (2013) ‘Political Ideas and Ideologies’ (chapter 2), in Heywood, A. Politics
(4th ed.) Basingstoke: Palgrave, 27-55. [custom textbook – chapter 7]
Is nationalism an ideology? If not, what is it? It has certainly been one of the most
important political phenomena of the last two centuries. Nationalism has been at the
root of wars of aggression and at the heart of movements of liberation. Nationalism is
a crucial factor underpinning state formation and disintegration and it is said that states
can only survive so long as it citizens feel part of a nation. More subtly, the language
of nationalism and the ‘national interest’ are used to justify many of the activities of
modern states. This lecture will explore nationalism and the nation. We will examine
how the ‘nation’ and how globalization has affected the sense of community and
identity of nations. We will also consider the concept of the ‘nation’ and how it differs
from the concept of the ‘state’ and discuss why the two concepts are often confused.
Required reading:
Heywood, A. (2014) ‘The Nation in a Global Age’ (chapter 7), Global Politics (2nd ed.)
Basingstoke: Palgrave, 161-184. [custom textbook – chapter 9]
Tutorial 2
The State
Theory and theorization – i.e. making sense of something theoretically – are key
aspects of the study of International Relations. For a number of decades, the field has
been dominated by intellectual disputes between the two main traditions of Liberalism
and Realism, which continue to play a central role in IR research and debate. In this
lecture we look at the basic tenets of each and talk about how they influence
contemporary thinking about global politics. The aim is to help you to start thinking of
everyday political problems in a theoretically informed way, and to start using theories
as tools for getting a better understanding of some of the puzzles and problems we will
discuss throughout this course.
Required readings:
Heywood, A. (2014) ‘Why Theory Matters’, in A. Heywood. Global Politics (2nd ed.)
Basingstoke: Palgrave, 514-530. [custom textbook – chapter 10]
Building on the previous lecture on traditional perspectives in IR, this lecture will
discuss ‘critical’ approaches to the discipline. The term ‘critical’ is used because it
suggests a radical departure from the traditional viewpoints covered in the last lecture.
Critical approaches focus on casting new light on aspects of IR that they think have
been neglected or overlooked for too long. Part of this discussion will be the interesting
question of whether theory is ever value-free, or whether theorists themselves might,
in fact, have a political agenda that informs the theoretical explanations they present
as solutions to political problems and issues. Ultimately, this aims at reminding you
how powerful your decisions are as an analyst – the way you decide to define key
issues in global politics determines your findings and the explanations that seem ‘true’
to you.
Required readings:
Schouten, P. (2009) ‘Theory Talk #37: Robert Cox on World Orders, Historical Change,
and the Purpose of Theory in International Relations’, Theory Talks,
http://www.theory-talks.org/2010/03/theory-talk-37.html (last accessed 17-08-18).
States come in many forms and guises: we speak of ‘normal’ states, ‘failing states’ or
failed states’, democratic, authoritarian or totalitarian states, developed or developing
states etcetera. What do we mean by these labels and as social scientists in the
making how can we meaningfully compare across states? In this session, you will be
briefly introduced to the comparative method and we will also explain why and how
comparison matters for social enquiry. We use variation in regime types to illustrate
how the comparative method operates in practice and what type of research questions
the comparative method can help you to answer across a range of political topics.
Dr Wilfried Swenden
This lecture introduces the role of political parties. Political parties play key functions
in democratic states: we look at functions such as interest aggregation, governmental
formation and electoral competition, and compare these roles with parties in non-
democratic states. We analyse key types of political parties (mass, cadre, catch-all and
cartel parties) and their historical evolution. We analyse whether parties still have a
function in the era of social movements and the so-called ‘decline of parties’. We
conclude that parties are still an essential, although changing feature of modern states,
democratic and otherwise.
Required reading:
Heywood, A. (2013) ‘Parties and Party Systems’ (chapter 10), in Heywood, A. Politics
(4th ed.) Basingstoke: Palgrave, 221-243. [custom text book – chapter 13]
Mair, P. (2008) ‘The Challenge to Party Government’, West European Politics, Vol.
31(1-2), 211-34 [resource list]
Competing IR Theories
WEEK 6: POWER
Power is one of the most important concepts in Politics and IR. In fact, some scholars
see it as a defining element of the discipline. Power affects how resources are
distributed, how countries interact, whether peace or war prevails, and how groups and
individuals pursue their interests; that is, power affects a vast number of topics studied
by political scientists. Surprisingly, it is also one of the most contested concepts in the
field. How is power defined? What are the different forms and dimensions of power?
Can it be measured? In this session we follow the conceptualization and
operationalization steps of the social scientific enquiry around this central concept. We
bring together a variety of theoretical perspectives and their conceptualization of power
and show how such a move can enliven and enrich our understanding of both the
nation state and the global governance.
Garner, R. (2012) ‘Political Power, Authority and the State’ (chapter 2), in Garner, R.,
P. Ferdinand and S. Lawson (eds), Introduction to Politics (2nd ed.). Oxford: OUP, 48-
66. [resource list and e-reserve on LEARN]
Building on the analysis of power from the last lecture, this lecture will discuss the
nature and effects of power in global politics. Who are the most powerful actors in
global politics and how do they use their power? Are there any constraints on how
power is used in global politics and how do those constraints work? How does the
`structure’ of the international system affect the prospects for war and peace? Is the
world less prone to conflict when one state has hegemony over it, or is that condition
just a recipe for imperialism and war? This lecture will also discuss the perspectives of
Realists, Liberals and Critical theorists on these and other questions related to power
in global politics.
Required reading:
Heywood, A. (2014) ‘Power and 21st Century World Order’ (chapter 9), in Heywood, A.
Politics (2nd ed.) Basingstoke: Palgrave, 216-245. [custom textbook – chapter 15]
Nye, J. (2011) `What is Power in Global Affairs’ (chapter 1) in J. Nye, The Future of
Power, Perseus Boks: New York. [resource list]
Civil society is one of the three social spheres, the other two being the state and the
market. It is widely used as a descriptive concept to assess the balance between state
authority and private bodies and associations. In the conventional, pluralist view, civil
society is identified as a realm of choice, personal freedom and individual
responsibility. Whereas the state operates through coercive authority, civil society
allows individuals to shape their own destinies. Building on previous week’s discussion
on power, we discuss the nature of civil society and its capacity to transform power
relations. We further discuss the challenges and opportunities information society
provides for civic participation.
Heywood, A. (2013) ‘Politics, Society and Identity’ (chapter 7) and ‘Political Culture and
the Media’ (chapter 8), in Heywood, A. Politics (4th ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave, 151-
195. [custom textbook – chapters 16 & 17]
Required reading:
Tutorial 6
Power
This lecture examines the nature and meaning of democracy. Where does democracy
come from and how has it evolved over time. Why has it been so difficult to find
agreement on a widely accepted definition of democracy? The lecture introduces
students to different forms of democracy (representative, republican, direct;
parliamentary vs liberal). We will also examine disputes about the justification of
democracy. Is democracy of value because it provides a procedure where all voters
have equal political rights? Or is it valuable because it produces better outcomes than
its alternatives? In other words, what does democracy require from those roles and
those who are governed? How can we measure democracy and what do we mean by
democratization? Finally, is there a ‘crisis’ of democracy and if so why?
Required reading:
Collier, D. and S. Levitsky (1997) ‘Democracy with Adjectives’, World Politics, Vol.
49(3), 430-451. [resource list]
Building on the analysis of democracy conducted in the previous lecture, this lecture
will discuss the effects of democracy in global politics. The core of the debate concerns
the veracity of the `democratic peace’ thesis, which argues that democracies do not
(or hardly ever) go to war with each other. What is the evidence for this thesis? What
might be the causal relationship between democracy and peace? What is the
relationship between democracy and the other elements of the so-called `Liberal
Peace’, economic interdependence and international institutions? If the thesis is
accurate, should the international community seek to spread democracy by force?
Required reading:
Tutorial 7
Civil Society
WEEK 9: SECURITY
Why do countries do what they do in their dealings with other states? That question is
at the heart of much of the discourse and analysis that has been focused on
international relations, and it is the question we seek to answer in this session. Do
leaders shape foreign policy? How do they make sense of the world? What are the
role of advisors and bureaucracies? We investigate these and similar questions using
insights from foreign policy analysis. We further talk about the domestic and
international constraints on foreign policy making and in order to capture the big picture
on the determinants of foreign policy.
Required Reading:
Grieco, J., G. Ikenberry and M. Mastanduno (2015) ‘The Analysis of Foreign Policy’
(chapter 4), in Introduction to International Relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
[custom textbook – Chapter 21]
Kegley, C. and G. Raymond (2010) ‘Foreign Policy Decision Making’ (chapter 3), in
The Global Future: A Brief Introduction to World Politics (3rd edition). Boston, MA:
Cengage. [resource list and e-reserve on LEARN]
This lecture provides an overview of the field of global security or, as it is sometimes
known, Security Studies. At the centre of it lies the understanding of the causes of war
and violent conflict and the means to resolve such conflicts and restore peace. The
lecture addresses the causes and consequences of security threats and the broader
“widened” security agenda which includes such issues as the proliferation of weapons
of mass destruction, terrorism, and the environment. We look at how something
becomes a security issue and what this means for the politics surrounding it.
Required Reading
Tutorial 8
Democracy
Required Reading
This lecture slot will be used for a Question/Answer and Exam Revision session. Dr
Hill will answer substantive questions emailed by students beforehand, go over sample
questions, and offer tips on how best to prepare for the exam and perform your best
during the exam.
Leftwich, A. (ed.) (2004) What is Politics? The Activity and its Study. Oxford: Polity,
see especially ‘On the Politics of Politics’, 1-18. [e-book in library]
Marshall, T. (2015) Prisoners of Geography. Ten Maps that tell you everything you
need to know about Global Politics. Elliott & Thompson. [e-book in library]
Burnham, P. et al. (2008) Research Methods in Politics (2nd ed.) Basingstoke: Palgrave
Macmillan.
Della Porta, D. and M. Keating (2010) Approaches and Methodologies in the Social
Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harrison, L. and T. Callan (2013) Key Research Concepts in Politics and International
Relations. London: SAGE.
Hay, C. (2002) Political Analysis: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave
Macmillan.
Kellstedt, P. and G. Whitten (2013) The Fundamentals of Political Science Research
(2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marsh, D. and G. Stoker (2010) Theory and Methods in Political Science (3rd ed.).
Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Moses, J. and T. Knutsen (2007) Ways of Knowing. Competing Methodologies in
Social and Political Research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Singer, D. (1961) ‘The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations’, World
Politics Vol. 14(1), 77-92.
Wendt, A. (1992) ‘Levels of Analysis vs. Agents and Structures: Part III’, Review of
International Studies Vol. 18(2), 181-185.
Dunleavy, P. and O’Leary, B. (1987) Theories of the State: the Politics of Liberal
Democracy Basingstoke: Macmillan Education. [chapter 1]
Garner, R. (2012) ‘Politics and the State’, in Garner, R., P. Ferdinand and S. Lawson
(eds), Introduction to Politics (2nd edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 27-47.
Gill, G. (2003) The Nature and Development of the Modern State. Basingstoke:
Palgrave, ch. 1 ‘The Modern State’, 1-32.
Hay, C., M. Lister and D. Marsh (eds.) (2006) The State. Theories and Issues.
Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan [in particular Peters, B.G. and J. Pierre
`Governance, Government, and the State: chapter 11] [e-reserve on LEARN]
Krasner, S. (2013) ‘New terrains: Sovereignty and alternative conceptions of power’, in
Finnemore, M. and J. Goldstein (eds.) Back to Basics: State Power in a Contemporary
World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mann, M. (1990) The Rise and Decline of the Nation State. Oxford: Blackwell, ch. 10.
Paul, T. et al (2003) The Nation-State in Question. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University
Press.
Pierson, C. (2004) The Modern State (2nd ed.). London: Routledge, ch.1 ‘Modern
States’, 4-26.
Poggi, G. (1990) The State: its Nature, Development and Prospect. Oxford: Polity.
Roeder, P. (2007) ‘Who gets a State of their Own’ in Where Nation-States Come From,
Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press, ch. 1, 3-42.
Lecture 6: Nationalism
Realisms
Gray, C. (1999) ‘Clausewitz Rules, OK? The Future is the Past with GPS’, Review of
International Studies Vol. 25(5), 161-182.
Green, D. and Shapiro, I. (1994) Pathologies of rational choice theory: A critique of
applications in political science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Green, D. and Shapiro, I. (1995) ‘Pathologies revisited: Reflections on our critics’,
Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society, 235-276.
Liberalisms
Constructivisms
General
Cox, R. W. (1981) ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International
Relations Theory’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies Vol. 10(2), 126-155.
Krause, K. (1998) ‘Critical Theory and Security Studies. The Research Programme of
Critical Security Studies’, Cooperation and Conflict Vol. 33(3), 298-333.
Levine, D. (2013) Recovering International Relations: The Promise of Sustainable
Critique. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Linklater, A. (1996) ‘13 The Achievements of Critical Theory’, in Smith, S., Booth, K.,
& Zalewski, M. (eds) (1996) International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 279-. [e-book in library]
McCormack, T. (2013) Critique, Security and Power. The Political Limits to
Emancipatory Approaches. London: Routledge.
Feminism
Aganthangelou and Ling (2009) Transforming World Politics: From Empire to Multiple
Worlds. Abingdon: Routledge.
Collins, A. (ed.) (2013) Contemporary Security Studies (3rd edition). Oxford: Oxford
University Press. [chapter 9]
Duncanson, C. (2013) Forces for Good? Military Masculinities and Peacebuilding in
Afghanistan and Iraq. Basingstoke: Palgrave Press
Duncanson, C. (2016) Gender and Peacebuilding. Cambridge: Polity
Enloe, C. (2014) Bananas, Beaches and Babes: Making Feminist Sense of
International Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kinsella, H. (2016) `Feminism’ in J. Baylis, S. Smith, S. and P. Owens (eds.) The
Globalization of World Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peoples, C. and N. Vaughan-Williams (2010) Critical Security Studies. An Introduction.
London: Routledge. [chapter 2 ‘Feminist and Gender Approaches’]
Peterson V.S. and A.S. Runyan (2014) Global Gender Issues in the New Millennium.
Boulder: Westview Press.
Shepherd, L.J. (2014) Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to
Global Politics. Abingdon: Routledge.
Steans J. (2013) Gender and International Relations (3rd ed.) Cambridge: Polity Press
Stern, M. and M. Zalewski (2009) ‘Feminist Fatigue (s): Reflections on Feminism and
Familiar Fables of Militarisation’, Review of International Studies Vol. 35:3, 611-630.
Tickner, J. (2004) ‘Feminist responses to international security studies’, Peace review
Vol. 16(1), 43-48.
Tickner, A. (2014) A Feminist Voyage through International Relations. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Wibben, A. (2010) Feminist security studies: a narrative approach. London: Routledge.
Young, I.M. (2003) ‘Feminist Reactions to the Contemporary Security Regime’, Hypatia
Vol. 18(1), 223-231.
Berger, M. (ed.) (2004) ‘After the Third World? History, destiny and the fate of Third
Worldism’ Third World Quarterly, Vol. 25(1), 9-39.
Brooker, P. (2009) Non-Democratic Regimes; theory, government and politics.
Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cai, Y. (2008) ‘Power Structure and Regime Resilience: Contentious Politics in China’,
British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 38, 411-32.
Chehabi, H. and J. Linz (1998) Sultanistic Regimes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins
University.
Landman, T. (2008) Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics (3rd edition). London:
Routledge (especially chapter 1 on ‘why compare countries’ and chapter 9 on
‘transitions to democracy’). [e-reserve on LEARN]
Leftwich, A. (2011) ‘Theorizing the State’, in Burnell, P., L. Rakner and V. Randall
(eds.) Politics in the Developing World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 181-95.
Levitsky S. and L.A. Way (2002) ‘The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism’, Journal of
Democracy Vol. 13(2), 51-66.
Bolleyer, Nicole (2014) New Parties in Old Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Detterbeck, K. (2012) Multi-Level Party Politics in Western Europe, Basingstoke:
Palgrave.
Duverger, M (1959) Political Parties, London: Methuen.
Ferdinand, P. (2012) ‘Votes, Elections, Parties’ (chapter 11), in Garner, R., P.
Ferdinand and S. Lawson (2012), Introduction to Politics (2nd ed.), Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 240-263.
Gunther, R. et al. (2002) Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Gunther, R. and L. Diamond (2003) ‘Species of Political Parties: A New Typology’,
Party Politics, Vol. 9(2), 167-199.
Katz, R. (2011) ‘Political Parties’ in Caramani, D. (ed.) Comparative Politics. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Katz, R. and W. Crotty (eds) (2006) Handbook of Party Politics. London: Sage.
Katz, R and P. Mair (1995) ‘Changing Models of Party Organisation and Party
Democracy: the Emergence of the Cartel Party’, Party Politics, Vol. 1(1), 5-28.
Lipset, S.M. and Rokkan, S. (1967) Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-
national Perspectives, New York: Free Press.
Lewis, P. (2000) Political Parties in Post-Communist Eastern Europe. London:
Routledge.
Luther, K. and Deschouwer, K. (1999) Party Elites in Divided Societies, London:
Routledge.
Luther, K. and F. Müller-Rommel (eds) (2002) Political Parties in the New Europe:
Political and Analytical Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mair, P. (1998) Party System Change Approaches and Interpretations, Oxford: Oxford
University Press, ch. 2, 5. Available at:
http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/oso/public/content/politicalscience/0198295499/t
oc.html
Mudde, C. (2007) Populist radical right parties in Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Panebianco, A. (1988) Political Parties. Organization and Power, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Sartori, G. (1976) Parties and Party Systems: a Framework for Analysis, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Special Issue Parliamentary Affairs, ‘What’s Left? The Left in Europe Today’, (2003)
Vol. 56(1).
Ware, A. (1996) Political Parties and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Webb, P. et al (eds) (2002) Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies,
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bachrach, P. and M.S. Baratz (1962) ‘Two Faces of Power’, American Political Science
Review, Vol. 56(4), 947-952.
Bachrach, P. and M.S. Baratz (1963) ‘Decisions and Nondecisions: An Analytical
Framework’, American Political Science Review Vol. 57(3), 632-642.
Almond, G. and S. Verba (1963) The Civic Culture. Princeton: Princeton University
Press.
Almond, G. and S. Verba (eds.) (1980) The Civic Culture Revisited. Boston: Little
Brown.
Carothers, T. and W. Barndt (1999) ‘Civil Society’, Foreign Policy, Vol. 117, 18-29.
Dalton, R. J. (2006) ‘Civil Society, Social Capital and Democracy’, in Dalton, R. and D.
Shin (eds) Citizens, Democracy and Markets around the Pacific Rim. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Entman, R. B. (1983) Democracy without Citizens: Media and the Decay of American
Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Franklin, M. (1984) ‘How the Decline in Class Voting Opened the Way to Radical
Change in British Politics’, British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 14, 483–508.
Hall, J.R. (ed.) (2013) Civil Society: Theory, History, Comparison. John Wiley & Sons.
Hallin, D. C. and P. Mancini (2004) Comparing Media Systems. Three Models of Media
and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Inglehart, R. and W. Baker (2000) ‘Modernization, Cultural Change, and Persistence
of Traditional Values’, American Sociological Review Vol. 65(1), 19–51.
Jackman, R. and R. Miller (1996) ‘A Renaissance of Political Culture’, American
Journal of Political Science, Vol. 40, 697-716.
Klingemann, H. and D. Fuchs (eds) (1995) Citizens and the State. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Lipset, S. (1981) Political Man: The Social Basis of Politics. London: Heinemann.
Putnam, R. D. (2001) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American
Community. Simon and Schuster.
Putnam, R.D., R. Leonardi, R. and R.Y. Nanetti (1994) Making Democracy Work: Civic
Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sander, T.H. and Putnam, R.D. (2010) ‘Still Bowling Alone? The Post-9/11 Split’,
Journal of Democracy, Vol.21 (1), 9-16. [e-journal]
Shah, D.V., N. Kwak and R.L. Holbert (2001) ‘“Connecting” and “Disconnecting” with
Civic Life: Patterns of Internet Use and the Production of Social Capital’, Political
Communication Vol. 18 (2), 141–62.
Sniderman, P., R. Brody and J. Kuklinski (1984) ‘Policy Reasoning and Political
Values’, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 28, 74–94.
Walzer, M. (1992) ‘The Civil Society Argument’, in Mouffe, C. (ed.) Dimensions of
Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship, Community. London: Verso.
Welzel, C. and R. Inglehart (2007) ‘Mass Beliefs and Democratic Institutions’, in Boix,
C. and S. Stokes (eds) Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. Oxford University
Press. Chapter 13.
Bown, M., S. Lynn-Jones and S. Miller (eds.) (1996) Debating the Democratic Peace.
London: MIT Press.
Bueno de Mesquita, B., B. Morrow, R. Siverson, and A. Smith, (1999) `An
Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace’, American Political Science
Review Vol. 93(4), 791-807.
Doyle, M. (1986) `Liberalism and World Politics’, American Political Science
Review Vol. 80(4), 1151-1169.
Doyle, M. (2005) `Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace’, American Political Science
Review, Vol. 99(3), 463-466.
Gowa, J. (2011) `The Democratic Peace After the Cold War’, Economics and Politics,
Vol.23(2), 153-171.
Gartzke E. and A. Weisiger (2013) `Dynamic Difference and the Democratic Peace’,
International Studies Quarterly Vol. 57(1), 171-185.
Hegre, H., T. Ellingsen, S. Gates and N. Gleditsch (2001) `Toward a Democratic
Civil Peace? Democracy, Political Change, and Civil War, 1816-1992’ American
Political Science Review Vol. 95(1), 33-48.
Layne, C. (1994) `Kant or Cant? The Myth of the Democratic Peace’, International
Security Vol. 19(2), 5-49.
MacMillan, J. (2012) ‘Hollow Promises? Critical Materialism and the Contradictions of
the Democratic Peace’, International Theory 4(3), 331-366.
Mansfield, E. and J. Snyder (1995) ‘Democratization and The Danger of War’,
International Security Vol. 20(1), 5-38.
Maoz, Z. (1998) `Realist and Cultural Critiques of the Democratic Peace: A Theoretical
and Empirical Re-assessment’, International Interactions Vol. 24, 3-89.
Oneal, J. and B. Russett (2003) `Finding peace in a world of hegemony and terrorism’,
International Relations of the Asia-Pacific Vol. 3(2), 265-282.
Rosato, S. (2005) `Explaining the Democratic Peace’ American Political Science
Review, Vol. 99(3), 467-472.
Allison, G. (2012) ‘The Cuban Missile Crisis at 50’, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 91 (4),
July/August, 11-16.
Beasley, R.K., J. Kaarbo, J.S. Lantis, & M.T. Snarr (Eds.), (2nd edition, 2012) Foreign
Policy in Comparative Perspective: Domestic and International Influences on State
Behavior (CQ Press).
Duffield, J. (1999) `Political Culture and State Behavior: Why Germany Confounds
Neorealism” International Organization Vol. 53, 765-803.
Hagan, J. (2001) `Does Decision Making Matter? Systemic Assumptions vs. Historical
Reality in International Relations Theory," International Studies Review, 5-46.
Levy, J. (2003) “Political Psychology and Foreign Policy,” in David Sears, Leonie
Huddy, and Robert Jervis (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology. New York:
Oxford University Press. 253-284.
Hermann, M. (1980) ‘Explaining Foreign Policy Behavior Using the Personal
Characteristics of Political Leaders’, International Studies Quarterly Vol. 24, 7-46.
Hill, C. (2003) The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy, Basingstoke: Palgrave
Holsti, O. (1996) Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy. Ann Arbor: University
of Michigan Press.
Hudson, V. (2005) `Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of
International Relations’, Foreign Policy Analysis Vol. 1, 1-30.
Janis, I. (1972) Victims of Groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Jervis, R. (1976) Perception and misperception in international politics. Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
Kaarbo, J. (2015) `The Domestic Politics & Decision Making Turn in IR Theory: An
FPA Perspective’, International Studies Review, Vol. 17, 189-216.
Kahneman, D., P. Slovic, P. and A. Tversky (eds.) (1982) Judgment under uncertainty:
Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Khong, Y. (1992) Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam
Decisions of 1965. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Lebow, R. (2010) Why Nations Fight: Past and Future Motives for War. New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Levy, J. S. (1983) ‘Misperception and the Causes of War’, World Politics Vol. 36, 76-
99.
McDermott, R. (2004) Political Psychology in International Relations. Ann Arbor:
University of Michigan Press.
Mercer, J. (2005) ‘Rationality and psychology in international politics’, International
Organization Vol. 59, 77-106.
Putnam, R. (1988) `Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: the Logic of Two-Level Games’,
International Organization 42: 427-460.
Post, J. (ed.) (2003) The Psychological Assessment of Political Leaders: With Profiles
of Saddam Hussein and Bill Clinton. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Risse-Kappen, T. (1991) Public Opinion, Domestic Structure, and Foreign Policy in
The School welcomes disabled students with disabilities and is working to make all its
courses as accessible as possible. If you have a disability special needs which means
that you may require adjustments to be made to ensure access to lectures, tutorials or
exams, or any other aspect of your studies, you can discuss these with your Student
Support Officer or Personal Tutor who will advise on the appropriate procedures.
Further guidance and information for Students with Disabilities can also be found in
your Programme Handbook.
Workshops are interactive: they will give you the chance to take part in activities, have
discussions, exchange strategies, share ideas and ask questions. They are 90 minutes
long and held on Wednesday afternoons at 1.30pm or 3.30pm. The schedule is
available from the IAD Undergraduate web page (see above).
Workshops are open to all undergraduates but you need to book in advance, using the
MyEd booking system. Each workshop opens for booking two weeks before the date
of the workshop itself. If you book and then cannot attend, please cancel in advance
through MyEd so that another student can have your place. (To be fair to all students,
anyone who persistently books on workshops and fails to attend may be barred from
signing up for future events).
Study Development Advisors are also available for an individual consultation if you
have specific questions about your own approach to studying, working more
effectively, strategies for improving your learning and your academic work. Please
note, however, that Study Development Advisors are not subject specialists so they
cannot comment on the content of your work. They also do not check or proof read
students' work.
(For support with English Language, you should contact the English Language
Teaching Centre).
What is PIRPALS?
PIRPALS is a Peer Assisted Learning Scheme for first year Politics and IR students,
run by students for students. Higher year student Leaders run weekly sessions where
you can discuss course content and practice essential study skills (such as essay
writing) in a relaxed and fun environment. They provide a space to ask questions you
might feel uncomfortable to ask lecturers or tutors. These sessions are open to
everyone - whether you're feeling a little behind, or just want to meet new people,have
fun and revise together
PIRPALS runs from Week 2 to Week 11. No sign-up needed, come along! Special
Essay and Exam sessions will be announced closer to the time.
All first year students should obtain an Information Pack of introductory information on
general services available from the Main Library. If you have any queries, e.g., about
using the computerised catalogue system, or where to find a journal, do not hesitate to
ask the library staff. A list of useful library and information resources can be found on
the library website at: www.lib.ed.ac.uk
The library holds a number of key sources for this course in the Library Reserve
Collection (Heavily Used Books – HUB) on the Ground Floor. Reserve Collection
books may be borrowed on 3-hour or overnight loan. Further information about the
reserve collection can be attained with the Library Support Team at ground floor level
in the main library.
You can access many websites covering various dimensions of general and
international politics. Remember: the internet is a wonderful resource when used
correctly, a poor research tool when used uncritically.
A word on Wikipedia: there’s nothing wrong with using this source for your own
background information but do not use or cite it as an authoritative source. Anyone
with internet access can create or edit a Wikipedia entry and these entries do not
undergo scholarly review.
For this course you will have been automatically assigned to a tutorial group and this
group will appear on your personalised timetable at the beginning of week 1. This
allocation is done using Student Allocator software which randomly assigns you to a
suitable tutorial group based on your lecture timetable. It is important you attend the
group on your personalised timetable, attending a different group will mean that you
will not appear on the register making your attendance difficult to track which could
lead to further difficulties for you.
Guidance on how to view your personal timetable can be found at
https://www.ed.ac.uk/student-administration/timetabling/personalised-timetables
If you are unable to attend the tutorial group you have been assigned, you can
request a change via the ‘Group Change Request’ form.
You can access the Group Change request form via the Timetabling webpages here
https://www.ed.ac.uk/student-administration/timetabling/personalised-timetables
Attendance Monitoring
In accordance with the University general degree regulations you are expected to
attend all teaching and assessment events associated with all courses that you are
enrolled on.
The College of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences undertakes routine monitoring
of attendance at tutorials and seminars for all students enrolled on courses delivered
by Schools within our College.
We undertake monitoring of attendance and engagement to enable us to identify
where individual students may be experiencing difficulties and to ensure that timely
and appropriate intervention can be delivered to provide support and guidance. We
also undertake monitoring for sponsored students specifically to meet our obligations
to the UKVI.
If you miss one or more of your tutorials and/or seminars you may be contacted by
your local Student Support Team and be asked to provide an explanation for your
absence.
All data is gathered and stored in line with the University policies and guidance on
data handling and you can view the privacy statement at:
https://www.ed.ac.uk/student-systems/use-of-data/policies-and-regulations/privacy-
statement
External Examiner
The External Examiner for Years 1 and 2 of the Politics and International Relations
programme will be confirmed at a later date.
Penalties that can be applied to your work and how to avoid them.
There are three types of penalties that can be applied to your course work and these
are listed below. Students must read the full description on each of these at:
http://www.sps.ed.ac.uk/undergrad/current_students/teaching_and_learning/assessm
ent_and_regulations/coursework_penalties
Make sure you are aware of each of these penalties and know how to avoid them.
Students are responsible for taking the time to read guidance and for ensuring their
coursework submissions comply with guidance.
• Lateness Penalty
If you miss the submission deadline for any piece of assessed work 5 marks
will be deducted for each calendar day that work is late, up to a
maximum of seven calendar days (35 marks). Thereafter, a mark of zero
will be recorded. There is no grace period for lateness and penalties begin to
apply immediately following the deadline.
Coursework is submitted online using our electronic submission system, ELMA. You
will not be required to submit a paper copy of your work.
Marked coursework, grades and feedback will be returned to you via ELMA. You will
not receive a paper copy of your marked course work or feedback.
For details of how to submit your course work to ELMA, please see our webpages
here. Remember, there is a 5 mark incorrect submission penalty, so read the guidance
carefully and follow it to avoid receiving this. #
If you have good reason for not meeting a coursework deadline, you may
request an extension. Before you request an extension, make sure you have
read all the guidance on our webpages and take note of the key points below.
You will also be able to access the online extension request form through our
webpages.
Students who sit the exam will also receive individual feedback. The relevant Course
Secretary will contact students to let them know when this is available and how to
access it.
If students wish to view their scripts for any reason, they must contact the relevant
Course Secretary via email to arrange this.
When you upload your work to ELMA you will be asked to check a box to confirm the
work is your own. All submissions will be run through ‘Turnitin’, our plagiarism
detection software. Turnitin compares every essay against a constantly-updated
database, which highlights all plagiarised work. Assessed work that contains
plagiarised material will be awarded a mark of zero, and serious cases of plagiarism
will also be reported to the College Academic Misconduct officer. In either case, the
http://www.ed.ac.uk/academic-services/staff/discipline/plagiarism
http://www.ed.ac.uk/schools-departments/records-management-section/data-
protection/guidance-policies/dpforstudents
Below is the most recent IPIR exam. Previous papers are available at:
http://www.ed.ac.uk/information-services/library-museum-gallery/exam-papers
You should answer TWO questions; one from Section A and one from
Section B.
Part A
Part B