ME136P / A2
Engineering Materials, Processes and Testing
Experiment no. 2
Tensile Test of Reinforcing Steel Bars
Claw Hammer
Deformed Steel Bar
Measuring Tape
Digital Caliper
Safety Goggles
V. PROCEDURES (10 pts)
1. Prepare all the materials needed for the experiment and classify which the two steel bars
(refer to Figure 1).
3. Measure the weight (in kg) of plain and deformed steel bars using electronic scale (refer
to figure 3).
7. Measure the average height of lugs, average spacing of lugs and gap of lugs for deformed
steel bars by using a digital caliper, (refer to figure 6, 7 and 8).
Figure 6. Measuring the height of lugs
9. Place one end of the steel bar in the upper crosshead of the loading unit while the other
end in the lower crosshead. Make sure that both ends are tightly gripped. (refer to figure
9).
Experiment No.: 2
TENSILE TEST OF REINFORCING STEEL BARS
Specimen Specimen
1 2 1 2
Label Label
Nominal
Classification PLAIN DEFORMED Diameter, 17.85 mm 15.29 mm
mm
Cross-
Length, mm 490 mm 505 mm sectional 250.25 mm2 183.61 mm2
Area, mm2
Yield
Weight, kg 0.893 kg 0.766 kg 292 340 kPa 355 450 kPa
Strength, kPa
Actual
Break
Variation in 1.822 kg/m 1.517 kg/m 276 980 kPa 385 490 kPa
Strength, kPa
Mass, kg/m
Ideal
Final Gage
Variation in 1.964 kg/m 1.441 kg/m 249 mm 248 mm
Length, mm
Mass, kg/m
Percent
Variation in
-7.23% 5.27% Elongation, 24.5% 24%
Mass, %
%
Average Final Cross-
Height of - 1.03 mm Sectional 75.28 mm2 107.33 mm2
lugs, mm Area, mm2
Average Percent
Spacing of - 7.22 mm Reduction 69.2 % 41.54 %
Lugs, mm Area, %
weight 0.893 kg kg
Actual Variation in mass (ma ) = = = 1.822
length 0.490 m m
πd2 kg π (0.01785m)2 kg
Ideal Variation in mass (mi ) = ρ x = 7850 3 x = 1.964
4 m 4 m
kg kg
ma -mi 1.822 m -1.964 m
Variation in mass = x 100 = x 100 = -7.23%
mi kg
1.964 m
weight 0.766 kg kg
Actual Variation in mass (ma ) = = = 1.517
length 0.505 m m
πd2 kg π (0.01529m)2 kg
Ideal Variation in mass (mi ) = ρ x = 7850 3 x = 1.441
4 m 4 m
kg kg
ma -mi 1.517 m -1.441 m
Variation in mass = x 100 = x 100 = 5.27%
mi kg
1.441 m
πd2 π (15.29mm)2
Cross-sectional Area (Arod ) = = = 183.61 mm2
4 4
1.01 + 1.05 + 1.03
Height of Lugs = = 1.03 mm
3
7.22 + 7.32 + 7.12
Average Spacing of Lugs = = 7.22 mm
3
2.47 + 2.39 + 2.31
Gaps of Lugs = = 2.39 mm
3
kN (1000mm)2
Yield Strength = 0.35545 x = 355450 kPa
mm2 (1m)2
kN (1000mm)2
Ultimate Strength = 0.49084 x = 490840 kPa
mm2 (1m)2
kN (1000mm)2
Break Strength = 0.38549 x = 385490 kPa
mm2 (1m)2
Final steel length-steel length 248mm-200 mm
Percent Elongation = x 100 = x 100 = 24%
steel length 200 mm
πd2 π (11.69 mm)2
Final Cross-sectional Area = = = 107.33 mm2
4 4
So -Su 183.61 mm2 -107.33 mm2
Percent Reduction Area = x 100 = x 100 = 41.54%
So 183.61 mm2
ILLUSTRATIONS
Before 200
mm
490.00
mm
After
9.79mm
249
mm
Before 200
mm
505
mm
After
11.69mm
553mm
Area =
17.85 mm
Upper Yield Maximum Stress
Limit
Breaking Point
Proportional Limit Lower Yield
Limit
Proportional Limit
VII. QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS (10 pts)
1. Why would an engineer be interested in the yield strength of a metal for a particular
application?
- It is important to know the yield strength of the material because the material must
be qualified to the desired strength needed. The grade of the material must satisfy the
requirement because if it is too low then the structure might fail. The metals should
not exceed its yield strength because it will permanently deformed and break.
3. How seriously are the results of tension test of reinforcement bar affected if the specimen
dimensions vary a little from the standard?
- The matter content between the reinforcement bar and the standard bar varies
significantly this is why there are big differences with the results of the tensile test.
4. Why is necessary to state the gauge length when reporting the percentage of elongation?
- Gauge length is necessary for the computation of the percentage elongation because
each ends of the gauge length serves as the location of the upper and lower
crossheads. Whereas it is the location where the metal are free to elongate.
After classifying the two bars into plain and deformed steel bar, they were measured by its
lengths and weights. The plain steel bar was heavier (0.893kg) than the deformed steel bar
(0.766kg) but the deformed steel bar is longer (505 mm) than the plain steel bar (490mm). As we
computed for the variation in mass of the two, deformed steel bar has a higher value (5.27%)
compared to plain steel bar (-7.23%). It means that the composition of the deformed steel bar is
not that uniform maybe because of the lugs present. The nominal diameter of plain steel bar (17.85
mm) is greater than the diameter of deformed steel bar (15.29mm) which states that the cross-
sectional area of the plain steel bar is greater than the deformed steel bar. After the tensile force
was applied in the both steel bars, both steel bars break at a certain point and formed a neck region.
The final gage length measured for the plain steel bar were 249 mm while for the deformed steel
bar we were unable to compute its gauge length for the reason that the breaking point of the bar is
excluded from the gauge length therefore we used the final length of the deformed bar instead of
the gauge length. The percent elongations of the two are 24.5% and 24% respectively. It means
that plain steel bar elongates faster than the deformed steel bar and also deformed steel bar has a
high tensile strength. The final cross-sectional areas of the two became lesser because of the
decrease in diameter where we measured it from the neck region. With the recorded flow of the
process shown in the stress-strain diagram, we were able to see the maximum strength at which
both steel bars can be now identified to its equivalent grade. Our tensile test with plain steel bar
resulted to Grade 230 (Structural Grade) while the deformed steel bar resulted to Grade 275
(Intermediate Grade).
IX. CONCLUSION (10 pts)
Tensile test, one of the tests the UTM can provide, determines the capabilities of the materials
tested. With the results of the tensile test shown in the stress-strain diagram, we can see the limits
and strength of the material through its proportional and yield limit, maximum stress and breaking
point. Also with the help of this diagram we can identify the grade of a plain steel bar resulted to
a grade of 230 (Structural Grade) and deformed steel bar resulted to a grade of 275 (Intermediate
Grade).
With the data gathered, it stated that the plain steel bar can elongate much longer, it means that
it has a lower tensile strength than the deformed bar. Which means that deformed bar is a better
pick in concrete as it doesn’t elongate that much it will result to lesser cracks. Also it has a low
tensile strength and ductility which is a better mix in concrete reinforcement as it blends better
with it than with plain steel bar.
X. RECOMMENDATION (5 pts)
I recommend in this experiment that the other groupmates who are not doing anything is to
take a picture of what his/her other groupmates is doing in the experiment. I recommend also to
be attentive in the experiment and lectures, so that we can easily differentiate the properties of
different composition of metals and determine which type of materials has the largest tensile
strength and at what point will it break at a certain force applied. Also the bars must have the same
length so that we can completely compare its result.
XI. REFERENCES
http://en.sopromat.org/tensile-strength-test.php
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yield_(engineering)
http://www.totalmateria.com/Article107.htm
https://stephanfavilla.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/tensile-testing-laboratory.pdf
http://me.aut.ac.ir/staff/solidmechanics/alizadeh/Tensile%20Testing.htm
http://www.engineeringintro.com/mechanics-of-structures/stress-strain-curve-
explanation/
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-concept-behind-2-yield-points-Upper-and-
Lower-in-a-stress-strain-curve