Anda di halaman 1dari 52

AAS.

See Addiction Accounting Program actuarial prediction: An


Acknowledgment Scale Admission Test approach to predicting
ABAP. See American Board (APAT), 364 behavior based on the
of Assessment acculturation: The process by application of
Psychology which an individual’s empirically
ABLE. See Adult Basic thoughts, behaviors, values, demonstrated statistical
Learning identity, and worldview rules and probabilities;
Examination develop in relation to the contrast with clinical
absolute cut score. See fi general thinking, behavior, prediction and
xed cut score absolute zero customs, and values of a mechanical prediction,
points, 75–77 abstract, particular cultural group, 419 509
ability to, 525–526 abuse: measures of, 419– adaptive behavior: Personal
(1) Infl iction of or allowing 420 reacculturation, conduct that one is
the infl iction of physical 490 variables related capable of modifying in
injury or emotional to, 421–422 age-appropriate ways to
impairment that is Achenbach Child Behavior effectively address needs,
nonaccidental; (2) the Checklist demands, and challenges,
creation of or allowing the (CBCL), 346, 348 94, 349
creation of substantial risk achievement test: adaptive testing: An
of physical injury or Evaluation of examination method or
emotional impairment that accomplishment or the procedure characterized
is nonaccidental; (3) the degree of learning that has by individually tailoring
committing of or allowing taken place, usually with presentation of items to
the committing of a sexual regard to an academic the testtaker; also
offense against a child; area, 20, 351 referred to as tailored
contrast with neglect, 142, for educational testing, sequential
502. See also child abuse assessment, 351–357 testing, branched testing,
accommodation: (1) In general, 352–363 items and response-contingent
Piagetian theory, one of on, 357 minimum testing, 316. See also
two basic mental competency, 57, 355–356 computerized adaptive
operations through which for predictive purposes, testing
humans learn, this one 359 in specifi c subject ADD. See anatomically
involving change from areas, 353–357 detailed doll
what is already known, acquiescent response style: Addiction Acknowledgment
perceived, or thought to fi A way of responding to test Scale
t with new information items characterized by (AAS), 489
(contrast with agreement with whatever is addiction,
assimilation ) ; (2) in presented; also referred to clinical/counseling
assessment, the as acquiescence, 390 ACT assessment for, 488–
adaptation of a test, Assessment, 360–361 490
procedure, or situation, or actuarial assessment: An Addiction Potential Scale
the substitution of one approach to evaluation (APS), 489
test for another in order to characterized by the Addiction Severity Index,
make the assessment application of empirically 489
more suitable for an demonstrated statistical ADHD. See attention defi cit
assessee with exceptional rules as a determining hyperactivity disorder
needs; (3) in the factor in the assessor’s adjective checklist, 395,
workplace, modifi cation judgment and actions; 397 adjustable light beam
of or adjustments to job contrast with clinical apparatus, 26
functions or assessment, ADRESSING: A purposely
circumstances, 25 , 282 467 – 468 , 509 misspelled word but easy-
to-remember acronym to
remind assessors of the aggression, 103, 380–381, derived, either by alternate
following sources of 394 Aggression assessment: (continued)
cultural infl uence: age, Questionnaire, 380–381 some special
disability, religion, AHPAT. See Allied Health accommodation made to the
ethnicity, social status, Professions Admission assessee or by alternative
sexual orientation, Test methods designed to
indigenous heritage, AHSGE. See Alabama High measure the same
national origin, and School Graduation Exam variable(s), 2 5, 28
gender, 486 Airman Qualifying Exam, alternate forms: Different
Adult Basic Learning 337 versions of the same test
Examination Alabama High School or measure; contrast with
(ABLE), 356 Graduation Exam parallel forms, 144 – 145
advanced placement (AHSGE), 355 , 153–154
program, 354 Alcohol Specifi c Role Play alternate item: A test item to
Test, 489 alcoholism, be administered only
clinical/counseling under certain conditions
I-1 assessment for, 488–490 to replace the
affi rmative action: alerting response: A administration of an
Voluntary and brightening and existing item on the test,
mandatory efforts widening of the eyes in 311
undertaken by federal, response to a stimulus, alternate-forms reliability:
state, and local indicative of an infant’s An estimate of the extent to
governments, private capacity for which item sampling and
employers, and schools responsiveness; contrast other errors have affected
to combat with orienting scores on two versions of the
discrimination and to response, 290 same test; contrast with
promote equal ALI standard: American Law parallelforms reliability, 1
opportunity in education Institute standard of legal 44 –1 45 , 153–154
and employment for all, insanity, which provides American Board of
53, 111 that a person is not Assessment Psychology
AFQT. See Armed Forces responsible for criminal (ABAP), 23
Qualifi cation Test conduct if, at the time of American Psychological
AGCT. See Army General such conduct, the person Association. See APA
Classifi cation lacked substantial Americans with Disabilities
Test age norms: Also capacity either to Act, 56 analogue behavioral
referred to as age- appreciate the criminality observation: The observation
equivalent norms, norms of the conduct or to of a person or persons in an
specifi cally designed for conform the conduct to environment designed to
use as a reference in the the requirements of the increase the assessor’s
context of the age of the law; contrast with the chance of observing targeted
testtaker who achieved a Durham standard and the behaviors and interactions,
particular score; contrast M’Naghten standard, 461
with grade norms, 118 – 496 analogue study: Research or
119 Allied Health Professions behavioral intervention
age scale: A test with items Admission that replicates a variable
organized by the age at Test (AHPAT), 364 or variables in ways that
which most testtakers are alternate assessment: An are similar to or
believed capable of evaluative or diagnostic analogous to the real
responding in the way procedure or process that variables the
keyed correct; contrast varies from the usual, experimenter wishes to
with point scale, 237 , customary, or standardized study; for example, a
314 way a measurement is laboratory study designed
to research a phobia of aphagia: A condition in by calculating an average
snakes in the wild, 460– which the ability to eat is of all scores in a
461 lost or diminished, 5 33n2 distribution, 80, 84, 86
anatomically detailed doll aphasia: A loss of ability to Armed Forces Qualifi cation
(ADD): A human fi gure express oneself or to Test
in doll form with understand spoken or (AFQT), 339
accurately represented written language due to a Armed Services Vocational
genitalia, typically used neurological defi cit, Aptitude Battery
to assist in the evaluation 533–534 (ASVAB), 337–340
of sexually abused apperceive: To perceive in Army Alpha test: An
children, 504 terms of past perceptions intelligence and ability
anchor protocol: A test (from this verb, the noun test developed by military
answer sheet developed apperception is derived), psychologists for use in
by a test publisher to 4 33 World War I to screen
check the accuracy of Apperceptive Personality literate recruits; contrast
examiners’ scoring, 272– Test (APT), with Army Beta test, 336
273 439–440 application Army Beta test: A
Anderson, Henry form, 561–562 APS. See nonverbal intelligence
Graeme, 565 Addiction Potential Scale and ability test
Anderson, Rebecca, APT. See Apperceptive developed by military
352, 353 Angoff, Personality Test aptitude test: psychologists for use
William H., 229 A test that usually focuses in World War I to
anorexia nervosa, 401 more on informal as opposed screen illiterate and
anxiety, 383 to formal learning foreign-born recruits;
APA: American experiences and is designed contrast with Army
Psychological to measure both learning and Alpha test, 336
Association; in other inborn potential for the Army General Classifi cation
sources, particularly purpose of making Test
medical texts, this may predictions about the (AGCT), 337 assessment
refer to the American testtaker’s future center: An organizationally
Psychiatric performance; also referred to standardized procedure for
Association, 1 5, 32, as a prognostic test and, evaluation involving multiple
61–63 on anorexia especially with young assessment techniques, 2,
nervosa, 401 DSM-IV children, a readiness test, 567
of, 74, 471–472, 478– 357 assimilation: In Piagetian
479 on intelligence, in career counseling, 548– theory, one of two basic
308 on revisions, 269 555 at college level, 361– mental operations
APAT. See Accounting 363 dynamic assessment, through which humans
Program Admission Test 363–366 for educational learn, this one involving
Apgar number: A score on a assessment, 357–366 at the active organization of
rating scale developed by elementary-school level, new information into
physician 359–361 entrance what is already perceived,
examinations for known, and thought;
professional or contrast with
occupational training, accommodation, 282
I-2 363–364 GATB, 550– assisted suicide, 63–65
Virginia Apgar that 555 at secondary-school AST. See Reitan-
embodies a simple, level, 360–362 Indiana Aphasia
rapid method of arithmetic mean: Also Screening Test
evaluating newborn referred to simply as the astronauts, 564–567
infants, 347 mean, a measure of ASVAB. See Armed
central tendency derived Services Vocational
Aptitude Battery at risk: by the total number of BDI. See Beck Depression
Defi ned in different ways scores, 88–89 Inventory
by different school districts, aviators, 564–567 Beck Depression Inventory
but in general a reference to (BDI), 182, 480 Beck Self-
functioning that is defi cient back stress, 13 bar graph: A Concept Test (BST), 385
and possibly in need of graphic illustration of data behavior raters, 458–459
intervention, 346–349 Atlas, wherein numbers indicative behavior rating scale, 459
Howard, 136 at-risk infant of frequency are set on the behavioral assessment: An
or toddler: According to vertical axis, categories are approach to evaluation based
IDEA, a child under 3 years set on the horizontal axis, on the analysis of samples of
of age who would be in and the rectangle bars that behavior, including the
danger of experiencing a describe the data are antecedents and
substantial developmental typically noncontiguous, 80– consequences of the
delay if early intervention 81 behavior, 452
services were not provided, Barnum effect: The analogue studies in,
348–349 consequence of one’s 460–461 approaches to,
attention defi cit belief that a vague 456–464 behavioral
hyperactivity disorder personality description observation and rating
(ADHD), 346, 348 truly describes oneself scales in, 457–559
attitude: A presumably when in reality that behaviors measured in,
learned disposition to description may apply to 454 issues in, 464–467
react in some almost anyone; location of, 456
characteristic manner to sometimes referred participants in, 454
a particular stimulus, to as the “Aunt Fanny psychophysiological
577–578 effect” because the same methods of,
in consumer psychology, personality might be 462–464 purpose of, 456
582–583 in educational applied to anyone’s Aunt role play in, 462 self-
assessment, 376–377 Fanny, 506, 508 basal monitoring in, 460
implicit, 583 inventories, level: A stage in a test situational performance
376–377, 408 achieved by a testtaker by measures in,
Attitude Interest Scale, meeting some preset 461–462 timing of,
408 Auditory criterion to continue to be 454–455 traditional
Apperception Test, 444 tested-for example, approach v., 453 , 455,
authentic assessment: responding correctly to two 457 unobtrusive measures
Also known consecutive items on an in, 464
as performance-based ability test that contains
behavioral neurology: The
assessment, evaluation increasingly diffi cult items
subspecialty area within
on relevant, meaningful may establish a “base” from the medical specialty of
tasks that may be which to continue testing; neurology that focuses on
conducted to examine contrast with ceiling level, brainbehavior
learning of academic 317 relationships, 512
subject matter but that base rate: An index, usually behavioral observation:
demonstrates the expressed as a proportion, Monitoring the actions of
student’s transfer of that of the extent to which a others or oneself by
study to real-world particular trait, behavior, visual or electronic means
activities, 374–375 characteristic, or attribute while recording
average deviation: A measure exists in a population, 1 quantitative and/or
of variability derived by 89, 191–192, 220, 222 qualitative information
summing the absolute BASIC ID, 588–589 regarding those actions,
value of all the scores in a BCG formula. See typically for diagnostic or
distribution and dividing BrogdenCronbach-Gleser related purposes and
formula either to design
intervention or to pulse and blood pressure, possible abnormalities that
measure the outcome of 463 entails the introduction of
an intervention, biopsychosocial assessment: radioactive material into the
10–11, 380, 457–459, A multidisciplinary approach brain for the purpose of
589 bell-shaped curve. to assessment that includes tracking its fl ow, 542
See normal curve Bender, exploration of relevant brand names, 589–590
Lauretta, 530–531 biological, psychological, Breathalyzer, 156
Bender Visual-Motor Gestalt social, cultural, and Bricklin Perceptual Scales
Test: A widely used environmental variables for (BPS), 109–110 Briggs,
screening tool for the purpose of evaluating Katharine Cook, 557–558
neuropsychological defi how such variables may have broad-band measures, 459
cit that entails the contributed to the Brogden, Hubert E., 216
copying and recall of development and Brogden-Cronbach-Gleser
designs; developed by maintenance of a presenting (BCG) formula, 216,
Lauretta Bender, it is also problem, 473 Birkeland, 223–224
referred to simply as “the Scott, 260, 261 bivariate Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of
Bender,” 481, 530–533 distribution: Also known as a Motor Profi ciency, 530
Bennet Mechanical scatterplot, scatter diagram, BST. See Beck Self-Concept
Comprehension or scattergram, a graphic Test burnout: A
Test, 548 bias: As representation of correlation psychological syndrome of
applied to tests, a factor accomplished by the simple emotional exhaustion,
inherent within a test that graphing of the coordinate depersonalization, and
systematically prevents points for values of the X - reduced personal
accurate, impartial variable and the Y -variable, accomplishment, 577 Buros,
measurement, 106, 199 129–133 Oscar Krisen, 31 business
intercept, 200 observer, Black Intelligence Test settings, 22. See also career
466–467 in personality of Cultural counseling; consumer
assessment, 387–388 rating Homogeneity, 304–307 psychology; employment
error and, 202–203 slope, Blacky Pictures Test, assessment
200 of test items, 264 393 blueprinting, 176– Butcher, James, 411–412,
validity and, 199–203 Big 177 bookmark method: 411n10
Five, 404 bimodal An IRT-based
distribution: A distribution method of setting cut California Psychological
in which the central scores that uses an item Inventory (CPI 434), 392
tendency consists of two book, where items are California Verbal Learning
scores, occurring an equal placed in ascending Test-II
number of times, that are order of diffi culty and (CVLT-II), 536
the most frequently with experts making CALS. See Checklist of
occurring scores in the judgments and literally Adaptive Living Skills
distribution, 82, 86 “bookmarking” items Campbell Interest and Skill
binary-choice item, 247, 249 that exhibit the optimal Survey, 549
Binet, Alfred, 39, 44, 75, level of diffi culty for CAP. See Child Abuse
280, 291, 300, 303 Binet- test items, 231 Potential Inventory
Simon Scale, 44, 303 Boring, Edwin G., 279 CAPA: An acronym that
biofeedback: A generic term Bosnia, 179–180 stands for computer
that refers to Boston Naming Test, 528 assisted psychological
psychophysiological BPS. See Bricklin assessment, 13–14, 63,
assessment techniques Perceptual Scales brain scan: 66, 510
designed to gauge, display, More formally referred to as career counseling ability
and record a continuous a radioisotope scan, a and aptitude assessment
monitoring of selected procedure in neurology used in, 548–555 CALS and,
biological processes such as to detect tumors and other
558–559 personal correlation v., 125 CBA. central tendency error: A
interest assessment in, See curriculum-based type of rating error
545–548 personality assessment wherein the rater exhibits
assessment in, 555–558 CBCL. See Achenbach a general reluctance to
transitions and, 559–560 Child Behavior issue ratings at either the
Career Interest Inventory, Checklist positive or negative
549 Cascio, Wayne, 231 case CBM. See curriculum-based extreme and so all or
history data: Records, measurement most ratings cluster in the
transcripts, and other CCAI. See Cross-Cultural middle of the rating
accounts in any media that Adaptability Inventory continuum, 202
preserve archival CDR. See clinical data
information, offi cial and recorder CDT. See clock-
informal accounts, and other drawing test ceiling, 317 I-4
data and items relevant to an ceiling effect: Diminished
assessee, 10 cerebral angiogram: A
utility of a tool of
in clinical/counseling diagnostic procedure in
assessment in
assessment, neurology that entails the
distinguishing testtakers at
479–480 in injection of a tracer
the high end of the ability,
neuropsychological element into the
trait, or other attribute
assessment, bloodstream prior to
being measured,
519–521 taking X-rays of the
249–250, 298 ceiling cerebral area, 542
level: A stage in a test
achieved by a testtaker as a CFA. See confi rmatory
result of meeting some preset factor analysis
I-3 Chapple v. Ganger, 539
criterion to discontinue
Caselman, Tonia, 448 testing-for example, CHC model: An abbreviation
CAT. See computerized responding incorrectly to two for the Cattell-Horn-
adaptive testing consecutive items on an Carroll model of
CAT: An acronym that ability test that contains cognitive abilities, 285–
stands for a neurological increasingly diffi cult items 288
scanning technology may establish a presumed K-ABC and, 369
called computerized axial “ceiling” on the testtaker’s Stanford-Binet Intelligence
tomography, 542 ability; contrast with basal Scale and,
categorical scaling: A system level and testing the limits, 311, 314–315
of scaling in which 317 WISC and, 325–326
stimuli are placed into central nervous system: All WJ-III and, 371 checklist:
one of two or more of the neurons or nerve A questionnaire formatted to
alternative categories that cells in the brain and the allow a person to mark items
differ quantitatively with spinal cord; contrast with indicative of information
respect to some the peripheral nervous such as the presence or
continuum, 237, 242 system, 512 absence of a specifi ed
category response curve. See central processing: behavior, thought, event, or
item characteristic curve Computerized scoring, circumstance,
category scoring. See interpretation, or other adjective, 395, 397
class scoring Cattell, conversion of raw test for preschool
James McKeen, 38–39 data that is physically assessment, 346,
Cattell, Raymond B., 285, transported from the same 348–349
403–404 or other test sites; Checklist of Adaptive Living
Cattell-Horn-Carroll model. contrast with Skills
See CHC model teleprocessing and local (CALS), 558–559 child
Cattell Infant Intelligence processing, 13 abuse: Nonaccidental infl
Scale (CIIS), 3 9 causation, iction or creation of
conditions that result in a to as category scoring, a for addiction and substance
child’s physical injury or method of evaluation in abuse,
emotional impairment, or a which test responses earn 488–490 case history
sexual offense committed credit toward placement in a data in, 479–480 of child
against a child, 502 particular class or category abuse and neglect, 502–
emotional and behavioral with other testtakers. 505
signs of, Sometimes testtakers must of competency to stand
503–504 issues of meet a set number of trial, 492,
reporting, 504 legal responses corresponding to a 494–495 of criminal
mandate regarding, particular criterion in order responsibility, 495–496 in
502 physical signs to be placed in a specifi c custody evaluations, 498,
of, 503 risk category or class; contrast 500–502 of emotional
assessment in, 505 with cumulative scoring and injury, 497–498 forensic
Child Abuse Potential ipsative scoring, 253 psychological assessment,
Inventory classifi cation: A rating, 490–498 general
(CAP), 191–192, 505 categorizing, or principles of, 484
child neglect: The failure by “pigeonholing” with interviews in, 473–
an adult responsible for a respect to two or more 479 mental disorders
child to exercise a criteria; contrast with diagnosed in,
minimum degree of care in screening, selection, 471–473 overview of,
providing the child with and placement, 469–471 profi ling and,
food, clothing, shelter, 560 – 561 498–499 psychological
education, medical care, classroom, psychometrics in, report of, 505–510
and supervision, 238–239 CLEP. See College psychological tests in,
502–505 Child Sexual Level Examination 480–482 of readiness for
Behavior Inventory, 350 Program parole or probation,
child with a disability: (1) In clinical data recorder 496–497
general, according to IDEA, (CDR), 458–459 clinical treatment guided
a child with mental prediction: In clinical by, 470
retardation, hearing practice, applying a clock-drawing test (CDT): A
impairments (including clinician’s own training and technique used in clinical
deafness), speech or clinical experience as a neuropsychological
language impairments, visual determining factor in examinations whereby
impairments (including clinical judgment and the testtaker draws the
blindness), serious emotional actions; contrast with face of a clock, usually
disturbance, orthopedic actuarial prediction and indicating a particular
impairments, autism, mechanical prediction, 508 time, that is then
traumatic brain injury, other – 510 evaluated for distortions
health impairments, or clinical psychology: That that may be symptomatic
specifi c learning disabilities; branch of psychology that of dementia or other
(2) for a child aged 3 through has as its primary focus neurological or
9, according to IDEA, a child the prevention, diagnosis, psychiatric conditions,
experiencing developmental and treatment of 528
delay in physical or abnormal behavior, 469. Cloud Picture Test,
cognitive, social, emotional, See also clinical/ 426n1 Cocaine Risk
communication, or adaptive counseling assessment Response Test, 489
development, 352 clinical settings, 21 clinical Code of Fair Testing
China, 35–36 utility, 208 Practices in
CIIS. See Cattell Infant clinical/counseling
Education (Joint
Intelligence Scale Civil assessment. See also
Rights Act of 1991, 205, 571 Committee of
culturally informed
class scoring: Also referred psychological assessment
Testing Practices), 62 coeffi cient of issues of, 47–49 comparative
code of professional generalizability: In scaling: In test
ethics: A body of generalizability theory, an development, a method
guidelines that sets forth index of the infl uence of developing ordinal
the standard of care that particular facets have scales through the use of
expected of members of a on a test score, 158 a sorting task that entails
profession, 54 coeffi cient of inter-scorer judging a stimulus in
coeffi cient alpha: Also reliability, 151 coeffi cient of comparison with every
referred to as stability: An estimate of test- other stimulus used on
Cronbach’s alpha and retest reliability obtained the test, 237, 242
alpha, a statistic widely during time intervals of six comparative utility, 208
employed in test months or longer, 143 compensatory model of
construction and used to Coggins, Margaret, 493 selection: A model of
assist in deriving an Cognitive Behavioral applicant selection based on
estimate of reliability; Driver’s the assumption that high
more technically, it is Inventory, 541 scores on one attribute can
equal to the mean of all cognitive development, balance out low scores on
split-half reliabilities, stages of, 282 cognitive another attribute, 227
149–150 coeffi cient of interview: A type of competence to stand trial:
correlation: Symbolized by hypnotic interview without Understanding the charges
r, the correlation coeffi cient the hypnotic induction; the against one and being able to
is an index of the strength of interviewee is encouraged assist in one’s own defense,
the linear relationship to use imagery and focused 492, 494–495 Competency
between two continuous retrieval to recall Screening Test, 495
variables expressed as a information, 475 completion item, 247, 249
number that can range from – collaborative interview: In composite judgment: An
1 to 1. Although different clinical psychology, a averaging of multiple ratings
statistics may be used to helping, open-ended of judgments for the purpose
calculate a coeffi cient of interview wherein both of minimizing rater error,
correlation, the most parties work together on a 466
frequently used is the common mission of computer assisted
Pearson r, discovery, insight, and psychological
124 – 125 , 126–128, enlightenment, 475 assessment. See CAPA
150 coeffi cient of collaborative psychological computerized adaptive
determination: A value assessment: A process of testing (CAT): An
indicating how much assessment wherein the interactive,
variance is shared by two assessor and assessee computeradministered
variables being calculated; work as “partners” from testtaking process
this value is obtained by initial contact through fi wherein items presented
squaring the obtained nal feedback. See also to the testtaker are based
correlation coeffi cient, therapeutic psychological in part on the testtaker’s
multiplying by 100, and assessment, 4 performance on
expressing the result as a college level aptitude tests, previous items, 248,
percentage, which indicates 361–363 College Level 274–275
the amount of variance Examination Program computerized axial
accounted for by the (CLEP), 354–355, 357 tomography. See
correlation coeffi cient, 127 college yearbook photos, 465 CAT concurrent
coeffi cient of equivalence: Color Inkblot Therapeutic validity: A form of
An estimate of parallel- Storytelling, criterion-related validity
forms reliability or 448 that is an index of the
alternate-forms Color-Form Sorting Test, degree to which a test
reliability, 144 526 communication, cultural score is related to some
criterion measure neuropsychological context, consultative report: A type of
obtained at the same time such as in response to interpretive report
(concurrently), 180, administration of items in the designed
182 confi dence interval: A Boston Naming Test,
range or band of test scores 528–529
that is likely to contain the Connors Rating Scales-
I-5
“true score,” 167 Revised
confi dential information: (CRS-R), 346, 348 co- consultative report:
Communication between norming: The test norming (continued) to provide
a professional and a process conducted on two or expert and detailed
client, along with other more tests using the same analysis of test data that
data obtained by the sample of testtakers; when mimics the work of an
professional in the course used to validate all of the expert consultant, 13
of a professional tests being normed, this consumer panel: A sample of
relationship that the process may also be referred respondents, selected by
professional has an to as co-validation, 270 demographic and other
ethical obligation not to construct: An informed, criteria, who have
disclose; contrast with scientifi c idea developed contracted with a
privileged information, or generated to describe consumer or marketing
68 or explain behavior; some research fi rm to respond
confi dentiality: The ethical examples of constructs on a periodic basis to
obligation of include “intelligence,” surveys, questionnaires,
professionals to keep “personality,” and related research
confi dential all “anxiety,” and “job instruments regarding
communications made or satisfaction,” various products,
entrusted to them in confi services, and/or
102, 193 construct
dence, although advertising or other
validity: A judgment about
professionals may be the appropriateness of promotional efforts, 585
compelled to disclose inferences drawn from test consumer psychology: The
such confi dential scores regarding individual branch of social
communications under standings on a variable called psychology dealing
court order or other a construct, 173, 193 primarily with the
extraordinary conditions, development,
in classrooms,
such as when such advertising, and
238 evidence of,
communications refer to marketing of products
194–199 of
a third party in imminent and services, 581
intelligence
danger; contrast with tests, 297 as attitude measurement in,
privacy right, 68 unifying 582–583 motivation
confi rmatory factor analysis concept, 194 research methods in,
(CFA): A constructed-response 586–591
class of mathematical format: A form of test surveys in,
item requiring the 584–586
procedures employed
when a factor structure testtaker to construct or content sampling: The
that has been explicitly create a response, as variety of the subject
hypothesized is tested opposed to simply matter contained in the
for its fi t with the selecting a response items; frequently referred
observed relationships (e.g., items on essay to in the context of the
between the variables, examinations, fi ll-in- variation between
198, the-blank, and short- individual test items in a
334–335 confrontation answer tests); contrast test or between test items
naming: Identifying a with selected-response in two or more tests and
pictured stimulus in a format, 245
also referred to as item I-6 COPS. See criterion-focused
sampling, 140 rated) leads to a more or occupational personality
content validity: A judgment less favorable rating than scales
regarding how adequately would have been made core subtest: One of a test’s
a test (or other tool of had the dissimilarity not subtests that is routinely
measurement) samples existed, 466 administered during any
behavior representative of control group: (1) In an administration of the test;
the universe of behavior experiment, the untreated contrast with
it was designed to group; (2) in test supplemental or optional
sample, 173, 176 development by means of subtest, 322
blueprinting and, 176– empirical criterion keying, a correlation: An
177 in classrooms, 238 group of randomly selected expression of the
culture and relativity of, testtakers who do not degree and direction
178–180 quantifi cation necessarily have in common of correspondence
of, 177–178, 177–179 the shared characteristic of between two things,
content validity ratio (CVR): the standardization sample, when each thing is
A formula, developed by 407 Controlled Word continuous in nature,
C. H. Lawshe, used to Association Test, 533 124–125
gauge agreement among convenience sample, 116 causation v., 125 coeffi
raters regarding how convergent evidence: With cient of, 124–125, 126–
essential an individual reference to construct 128, 150 graphic
test item is for inclusion validity, data from other representations of, 129–
in a test, 178–179 measurement instruments 135 Pearson r, 126 – 128
content-referenced testing designed to measure the , 150 perfect, 125
and same or a similar construct as regression and, 133–135
assessment. See the test being construct- Spearman’s rho, 128–129
criterionreferenced testing validated and that all point to costs, utility infl uenced by,
and assessment the same judgment or 210–212 counseling
continuous scales, 72–73 conclusion with regard to a psychology: A branch of
contralateral control: test or other tool of psychology that has to do
Phenomenon resulting from measurement; contrast with with the prevention,
the fact that each of the two discriminant evidence, 197 diagnosis, and treatment of
cerebral hemispheres convergent thinking: A abnormal behavior, with
receives sensory deductive reasoning emphasis on “everyday”
information from the process that entails recall types of concerns and
opposite side of the body and consideration of facts problems such as those
and also controls motor as well as a series of related to marriage, family,
responses on the opposite logical judgments to academics, and career, 469.
side of the body; narrow down solutions See also clinical/counseling
understanding of this and eventually arrive at assessment counseling
phenomenon is necessary in one solution; contrast settings, 21
understanding brain- with divergent thinking, Couples Interaction Scoring
behavior relationships and 342 System,
in diagnosing convergent validity: Data 459 co-validation: The
neuropsychological defi indicating test validation process
cits, 513 that a test measures the conducted on two or more
contrast effect: A potential same construct as another tests using the same sample
source of error in test purporting to of testtakers; when used in
behavioral ratings when a measure the same conjunction with the
dissimilarity in the construct, 197n3 creation of norms or the
observed behaviors (or revision of existing norms,
Cooperative Achievement
other things being Test, 354 this process may also be
referred to as co-norming, deriving meaning from (CCAI), 559 cross-
270 – 271 test scores by evaluating species research, 384 cross-
CPI 434. See California an individual’s score with validation: A revalidation on
Psychological reference to a set standard a sample of testtakers other
Inventory cranial nerves, (or criterion); contrast than the testtakers on whom
523–524 creativity tests, with normreferenced test performance was
341–343 credentialing, 22– testing and assessment, originally found to be a valid
23 criminal responsibility, 122 – 124 , 155, 235– predictor of some criterion,
495–496 criterion 236 criterion-related validity: 270–271
contamination: A state in A judgment regarding how CRS-R. See Connors Rating
which a criterion measure is adequately a score or index ScalesRevised
itself based, in whole or in on a test or other tool of CRUST. See
part, on a predictor measure, measurement can be used to Cultural/Regional
181 infer an individual’s most Uppercrust Savvy Test
criterion: The standard probable standing on some crystallized intelligence: In
against which a test or a measure of Cattell’s two-factor theory of
test score is evaluated; interest (the criterion), 173, intelligence, acquired skills
this standard may take 175, and knowledge that are
many forms, including a 180 CAP Inventory highly dependent on formal
specifi c behavior or set and, 191–192 in and informal education;
of behaviors, 122, classrooms, 238 contrast with fl uid
181–182, 404 criterion concurrent, 180, 182 intelligence, 285 – 287
group: A reference group of criterion characteristics cultural issues
testtakers who share in, 181–182 decision communication, 47–
characteristics and whose theory, test utility and, 49 content validity
responses to test items serve 189–190, 192–193 and, 178–180
as a standard by which items expectancy data and, evaluation standards,
will be included or 185–189 incremental, 49–50 evolving
discarded from the fi nal 184–185 of interviews, interest in, 42–47
version of a scale; the shared 479 predictive, 180, general principles of,
characteristic of the criterion 182–183, 191–192 484–485 group
group will vary as a function validity coeffi cient membership, 51–53
of the nature and scope of and, 183–184 intelligence testing, 42–46,
the test being developed, critical incidents technique: 69,
404 In workplace settings, a 302–308 minority
empirical criterion keying procedure that entails cultures, 47, 205–
and, 404–406 recording employee 207,
MMPI and, 406–412 behavior evaluated as 302–308 in personality
MMPI-2 and, 410–412 in positive or negative by a assessment, 389, 400,
personality assessment, supervisor or other rater, 418–422
404–418 572 Cronbach, Lee J., 157– public
criterion-focused 158, 216 cross-battery policy, 53
occupational personality assessment: Evaluation that culturally informed
scales (COPS), 556 employs tests from psychological assessment:
criterion-referenced testing different test batteries and An approach to evaluation
and assessment: Also entails interpretation of data that is keenly perceptive
referred to as domain- from specifi ed tests to about and responsive to
referenced testing and provide a comprehensive issues of acculturation,
assessment and content- assessment, 287 values, identity, worldview,
referenced testing and Cross-Cultural Adaptability language, and other
assessment, a method of Inventory culture-related variables as
evaluation and a way of they may affect the
evaluation process or the favor people from any child evaluation in, 501–
interpretation of resulting culture, 303 502 parent evaluation in,
data, 137–138, 389 cumulative scoring: A 500–501 projective
disagreements regarding, method of scoring whereby techniques used in, 501
482 interviews in, 486–487 points or scores accumulated tender years doctrine
managed care and, 487– on individual items or and, 498, 500
488 model for teaching, subtests are tallied and then, cut score: Also referred to
484–485 questions about, the higher the total sum, the as a cutoff score, a
483 higher the individual is reference point
shifting cultural lenses in, presumed to be on the (usually numerical)
483, 486 ability, trait, or other derived as a result of
Cultural/Regional Uppercrust characteristic being judgment and used to
Savvy measured; contrast with divide a set of data into
Test (CRUST), 306–307 class scoring and ipsative two or more classifi
culture: The socially scoring, 104 curriculum- cations, with some
transmitted behavior based assessment (CBA): A action to be taken or
patterns, beliefs, and general term referring to some inference to be
products of work of a schoolbased evaluations that made on the basis of
particular population, clearly and faithfully refl ect these classifi cations,
community, or group of what is being taught, 357 6–7, 225
people, 42 curriculum-based fi xed, 226 for high stakes
Culture Fair Test of measurement (CBM): A decisions, 228 multiple,
Intelligence, 304, type of curriculumbased 226 relative, 225–226
306–307 culture assessment characterized setting of, 227–232 in
loading: An index of the by the use of standardized utility analysis, 220–223,
magnitude to which a test measurement procedures 225–232
incorporates the to derive local norms to CVLT-II. See
vocabulary, concepts, be used in the evaluation California Verbal
traditions, knowledge, and of student performance Learning Test-II CVR.
feelings associated with a on curriculum-based See content validity
particular culture, 303–306 tasks, 357 ratio dangerousness,
culture specifi c tests, 43 curvilinearity: Usually with 491–494
culture-fair intelligence regard to graphs or
test: A test or assessment correlation scatterplots, DAP test. See Draw a
process designed to the degree to which the Person test DAP:SPED. See
minimize the infl uence of plot or graph is Draw a Person:
culture on various aspects characterized by Screening Procedure for
of the evaluation curvature, 129 Emotional
procedures, such as the custody evaluation: A Disturbance
administration instructions, psychological Darwin, Charles, 36–37
the item content, the assessment of parents or DAS. See Differential
responses required of the guardians and their Abilities Scale DAT. See
testtaker, and the parental capacity and/or Dental Admission Test
interpretations made from of children and their data
the resulting data, 304, 306 parental needs and safekeeping of, 69
culture-free intelligence preferences—usually statistics
test: In psychometrics, undertaken for the describing, 77–92
the ideal of a test that is purpose of assisting a data reduction, 402–404
devoid of the infl uence court in making a Daubert v. Merrell Dow
of any particular culture decision about awarding
Pharmaceuticals,
and therefore does not custody, 500
59 – 61 , 539
decision study: Conducted at 317, 319, 327, 330, 353 471–472, 479 third
the conclusion of a developmental milestone: edition v., 478 – 479
generalizability study, Important event during the diagnostic information: In
this research is designed course of one’s life that may educational contexts, test
to explore the utility and be marked by the acquisition, or other data used to
value of test scores in presence, or growth of pinpoint a student’s diffi
making decisions, 158 certain abilities or skills or by culties for the purpose of
decision theory: A body of the failure, impairment, or remediating them;
methods used to cessation of such abilities or contrast with evaluative
quantitatively evaluate skills, 519–520 information, 366
selection procedures, developmental norms: Norms diagnostic test: A tool used
diagnostic classifi derived on the basis of to make a diagnosis,
cations, therapeutic any trait, ability, skill, or usually to identify areas
interventions, or other other characteristic that is of defi cit to be targeted
assessment or presumed to develop, for intervention, 20, 366
intervention-related deteriorate, or otherwise for educational
procedures in terms of be affected by assessment, 366–368
how optimal they are chronological age, school group, 368 math, 367–368
(most typically from a grade, or stage of life, reading, 366–367, 368
cost-benefi t perspective), 120 diagnostic utility, 208 diary
189–190, 192–193 deviation IQ: A variety of panel: A variety of
decision-theoretic approach, standard score used to consumer panel in which
to setting cut scores, 231 report “intelligence respondents have agreed to
declarative memory: quotients” (IQs) with a keep diaries of their
Memory of factual mean set at 100 and a thoughts and/or behaviors,
material; contrast with standard deviation set at 585
procedural memory, 534 – 15; on the Stanford-Binet, dichotomous test item: A
536 Delayed Response test, it is also referred to as a test item or question that
316–317 dementia, 521– test composite and can be answered with
522, 533 demoralization, represents an index of only one of two
413 Dental Admission Test intelligence derived from response
(DAT), 364 deterioration a comparison between the
quotient: Also referred to performance of an
as a deterioration index, individual testtaker and I-8
this is a pattern of subtest the performance of other options, such as true-
scores on a Wechsler test testtakers of the same age false or yesno, 159
that Wechsler himself in the test’s Dietz, Park, 494
viewed as suggestive of standardization sample, DIF. See differential item
neurological defi cit, 525 313
functioning
diagnosis: A description or
DIF analysis: In IRT, a
conclusion reached on the process of group-by-
I-7 basis of evidence and group analysis of item
developmental delay: Slower opinion through a process
response curves for the
than expected progress of distinguishing the purpose of evaluating
(usually on the basis of nature of something and measurement instrument
age norms) with regard to ruling out alternative or item equivalence
physical, cognitive, conclusions, 20 across different groups of
social, emotional, Diagnostic and Statistical testtakers, 274
adaptive, or Manual of Mental DIF items: In IRT, test
communication-related Disorders IV (DSM-IV) items that respondents
expansion of one’s ability (APA), 74, 471–472 from different groups,
or potential, 94, revised (DSM-IV-TR), who are presumably at
the same level of the more of the major life possible; contrast with
underlying construct activities of an individual, convergent thinking, 342
being measured, have 29–30, DMM. See Drinking
different probabilities 63, 235, 349, 485, 543, Motives Measure
of endorsing as a 548 discrete scales, 72 DOC. See Discussion of
function of their group discriminant analysis: A Organizational
membership, 274 family of statistical Culture domain
Differential Abilities Scale techniques used to shed light sampling: (1) A sample
(DAS), on the relationship between of behaviors from all
200–201, 335 differential certain variables and two or possible behaviors that
item functioning (DIF): In more naturally occurring could be indicative of a
IRT, a phenomenon in which groups, 231 particular construct; (2) a
the same test item yields one discriminant evidence: With sample of test items from
result for members of one reference to construct all possible items that
group and a different result validity, data from could be used to measure
for members of another a test or other a particular construct, 1
group, presumably as a result measurement instrument 04n1, 157
of group differences that are showing little domain-referenced testing
not associated with group relationship between test and assessment. See
differences in the construct scores or other variables criterionreferenced
being measured, 274 with which the scores on testing and assessment
diffuse lesion, 514 the test being Draw a Person: Screening
dimensional qualitative constructvalidated should Procedure for Emotional
research: An adaptation of not theoretically be Disturbance (DAP:
Lazarus’s multimodal correlated; contrast with SPED), 447
clinical approach for use in convergent evidence, 197 Draw a Person (DAP) test,
qualitative research – 198 446 Drinking Motives
applications and designed to discrimination: In IRT, the Measure (DMM), 23 drug
ensure that the research is degree to which an item addiction, clinical/counseling
comprehensive and differentiates among assessment for, 488–490
systematic from a people with higher or drug testing, 569–570
psychological perspective lower levels of the trait,
and is guided by discussion DSM-IV. See Diagnostic
ability, or whatever it is
questions based on the seven that is being measured and Statistical Manual of
modalities (or dimensions) by a test, 52, 57–58, 159 Mental Disorders IV
named in Lazarus’s model, Discussion of Organizational DSM-IV-TR: Abbreviation
which are summarized by the Culture for
acronym BASIC ID (DOC), 580–581 distinct Diagnostic and
(behavior, affect, sensation, groups, evidence from, 196– Statistical Manual of
imagery, cognition, 197 distractors, 245 Mental Disorders,
interpersonal relations, and distribution: In a Fourth Edition, Text
drugs); Cohen’s adaptation psychometric context, a set Revision (published in
of Lazarus’s work adds an of test scores arrayed for May 2000), a slightly
eighth dimension, recording or study, 78
sociocultural, changing the modifi ed version of
divergent thinking: A
acronym to BASIC IDS, 5 88 DSM-IV (published in
reasoning process
direct estimation, 243 characterized by fl 1994),
disability: As defi ned in the exibility of thought, 471–472, 479
Americans with Disabilities originality, and dual-easel format,
Act of 1990, a physical or imagination, making 350 Dugdale,
mental impairment that several different solutions Richard, 294
substantially limits one or
Durham standard: A standard of brain lesions and electrode inserted directly
of legal insanity in abnormalities, 542 into the muscle, 5 42
Durham v. United States economic benefi ts, elementary-school
wherein the defendant 213–214 economic aptitude tests, 359–361
was not found culpable costs, 210–211 ECSP. Ellis Island, 42–43, 46
for criminal action if his See Exceptional Case EMG. See
unlawful act was the Study electromyograph emotional
product of a mental Project educational expression, 465 emotional
disease or defect; contrast assessment achievement injury: A term sometimes
with the ALI standard tests for, 351–357 aptitude used synonymously with
and the M’Naghten tests for, 357–366 authentic mental suffering, emotional
standard, 496 assessment, 373–374 harm, and pain and
Dusky v. United States, 492 diagnostic tests for, 366– suffering to convey
duty to warn: A legally 368 peer appraisal, 375–376 psychological damage,
mandated obligation—to performance assessment, 497–498
advise an endangered third 373–375 portfolio emotional intelligence: A
party of their peril—which assessment, 373–375 popularization of aspects
may override patient psychoeducational test of Gardner’s theory of
privilege; therapists and batteries for, multiple intelligences,
assessors may have a legal 368–373 of study with emphasis on the
duty to warn when a client habits, interests, and notions of interpersonal
expresses intent to hurt a attitudes, 376–377 and intrapersonal
third party in any way, Educational Resources intelligence, 284
ranging from physical Information empirical criterion keying:
violence to disease Center (ERIC), 32 The process of using
transmission, 491 educational settings, 20– criterion groups to
dynamic assessment: An 21 develop test items,
interactive approach to testing and assessment in, where the scoring or
psychological assessment 345–377 keying of items has been
that usually follows a Educational Testing Service demonstrated
model of evaluation (ETS), 32 empirically to
followed by intervention Edwards Personal Preference differentiate among
of some sort, and then Schedule groups of testtakers,
further evaluation, 4, (EPPS), 253, 396, 555, 404–406
363–366 567 employment
dynamic characteristic: A EEG. See assessment
trait, state, or ability application form in,
electroencephalograph
presumed to be ever- 561–562 attitude and,
changing as a function EEOC. See Equal
Employment 577–578 of cognitive
of situational and ability, 570–571
cognitive experiences; Opportunity
diversity and, 570–
contrast with static Commission egalitarianism,
571 interviews in,
characteristic, 153 53 elaboration, 342
electroencephalograph 563 letters of
dynamometer, 77 recommendation in,
(EEG): A machine that
records electrical activity of 562–563 motivation and,
easel format, 350 eating 574–577 organizational
disorders, 26, 198–199 the brain by means of
electrodes pasted to the culture and, 578–581
echoencephalograph: In performance tests in, 563–
neurology, a machine that scalp, 542
567 physical tests in, 567–
transforms electrical energy electromyograph (EMG): A 570 portfolio assessment
into sound energy for the machine that records in, 563 productivity and,
purpose of diagnostic studies electrical activity of 571–574 résumé and letter
muscles by means of an
of application in, 561 error variance: In the true Psychological Tests and
screening, selection, score model, the Diagnostic
classifi cation, component of variance Aids (APA), 62 ethics:
and placement in, 560– attributable to random A body of principles of
561 English profi ciency sources irrelevant to the right,
tests, 354 trait or ability the test proper, or good conduct;
Entrance Examination for purports to measure in contrast with laws, 54 ETS.
Schools of an observed score or See Educational Testing
Nursing (RNEE), 364 distribution of scores; Service eugenics: The
environment, testing, 24, 28, common sources of science of improving
29–30 episodic memory: error variance include qualities of a breed through
Memory for facts but only those related to test intervention with factors
within a particular context or construction (including related to heredity, 45
situation; contrast with item or content evaluation standards, cultural
semantic memory, 535 – 536 sampling), test issues regarding, 49–50
EPPS. See Edwards Personal administration, and test evaluative information: Test
Preference Schedule scoring and or other data used to
Equal Employment interpretation, 1 05–106, make judgments such as
Opportunity 140 class placement, pass-fail,
Commission (EEOC), 57 from assessment situation, and admit-reject
equal-appearing intervals, 142–143 summary of, decisions; contrast with
243 equipercentile method: A 152–153 from test diagnostic information,
procedure for comparing administration, 141 from 366
scores on two or more tests test construction, 140 from event recording, 455
(as in the creation of national test scoring and everyday accommodations,
anchor norms) that entails interpretation, 29–30 evolutionary view of
calculating percentile norms 141–142 essay item, mental disorder:
for each test and then 247, 249 estimate of inter- The view that an
identifying the score on each item consistency. See attribution
test that corresponds to the inter-item consistency
percentile, 121 estimated true score
error: Collectively, all of the transformations, 202 eta I-9
factors other than what a squared, 129n8 ethical issues evolutionary view of mental
test purports to measure assisted suicide, 63–65 disorder: (continued) of
that contribute to scores computerized tests, 63, mental disorder requires a
on the test; error is a 66 ethics code, 54 scientifi c judgment (from
variable in all testing and general principles of, an evolutionary
assessment, 73, 105. See 484 informed consent, perspective) that there
also error variance; 66–67 informed of test fi exists a failure of
reliability ndings, 67–68 least function as well as a
rating, 202–203 stigmatizing label, 69– value judgment (from the
transient, 152 70 people with perspective of social
error of central tendency: disabilities, 63 privacy values) that the failure is
Less than accurate rating and confi dentiality, 68– harmful to the individual,
or evaluation by a rater or 69 professional 472
judge due to that rater’s guidelines, 61–62 Exceptional Case Study
general tendency to make testtaker’s rights, 66–70
Project (ECSP),
ratings at or near the test-user qualifi cations,
62–63 494
midpoint of the scale; executive
contrast with generosity Ethical Standards for the
functions: In
error and severity error, Distribution of
neuropsychology,
387
organizing, planning,
cognitive fl exibility, extended scoring report: A example, the number of items
inhibition of impulses, type of scoring report in the test, the amount of
and other activities that provides not only training the test scorers have
associated with the a listing of scores but had, and the purpose of the
frontal and prefrontal statistical data as well, test administration, 157
lobes of the brain, 526– 13 factor analysis: A class of
530 external locus of control, mathematical
Exner, John E., Jr., 428, 430– 392–393 extra-test behavior: procedures, frequently
431, 449 expectancy chart: Observations made by an employed as data
Graphic representation of an examiner regarding what the reduction methods,
expectancy table, 185, 187, examinee does and how the designed to identify
224 examinee reacts during the variables on which
expectancy data: course of testing (e.g., how people may differ (or
Information, usually in the testtaker copes with factors), 198–199, 256–
the form of an expectancy frustration; how much 257, 282
table, illustrating the support the testtaker seems to correlations in,
likelihood that an require; how anxious, 332–333 factor
individual testtaker will fatigued, cooperative, or loadings in, 333
score within some distractible the testtaker is) purpose of, 332–
interval of scores on a that are indirectly related to 333 two-factor,
criterion measure, 185– the test’s specifi c content 283–284 types of,
189 but of possible signifi cance 198, 283, 333–
in utility analysis, 216, 224 to 335
expectancy table: factor loading: In factor
Information presented in analysis, a metaphor
tabular form illustrating I-10 suggesting that a test (or
the likelihood that an an individual test item)
individual testtaker will interpretations regarding carries with it or “loads”
score within some the testtaker’s on a certain amount of
interval of scores on a performance, 318 one or more abilities that,
criterion measure, 185– extrinsic motivation: A state in turn, have a
188 in which the primary determining infl uence on
experimental psychology, force driving an the test score (or on the
37–38, 67 expert panel: In individual comes from response to the individual
the test development process, external sources (such as test item), 198, 333
a group of people a salary or bonus) and fairness: As applied to tests,
knowledgeable about the external constraints (such the extent to which a test
subject matter being tested as job loss); contrast with is used in an impartial,
and/or the population for intrinsic motivation, 576 just, and equitable way,
whom the test was designed face validity: A judgment 106
who can provide input to regarding how well a group membership and,
improve the test’s content, test or other tool of 205–207 item, 264
fairness, and other related measurement measures misunderstandings of,
ways, 267 what it purports to 204 validity and, 199,
expert witnesses, 59–61 measure that is based 203–207
exploratory factor analysis: solely on “appearances,” false negative: A specifi c
A class of mathematical such as the content of type of miss
procedures employed to the test’s items, characterized by a tool
estimate factors, extract 174–176 facet: In of assessment indicating
factors, or decide how many generalizability theory, that the testtaker does
factors to retain, 1 98, 333– variables of interest in the not possess or exhibit a
334 universe including, for particular trait, ability,
behavior, or attribute standardized tests to trait, or other attribute
when in fact, the be administered in a being measured,
testtaker does possess or prescribed fashion, 248–249
exhibit this trait, ability, such as the fl uency, 342 fl uid
behavior, or attribute, HalsteadReitan intelligence: In Cattell’s
190, 569 Neuropsychological twofactor theory of
false positive: An error in Battery; contrast with fl intelligence, nonverbal
measurement exible battery, 538 – 539 abilities that are relatively
characterized by a tool of fi xed cut score: Also known less dependent on culture
assessment indicating as an absolute cut score, and formal instruction;
that the testtaker a reference point in a contrast with crystallized
possesses or exhibits a distribution of test scores intelligence, 285 – 287
particular trait, ability, used to divide a set of Flynn, James R., 299–300
behavior, or attribute data into two or more Flynn effect: “Intelligence
when in fact the testtaker classifi cations that is infl ation”; the fact that
does not, 190, 569 typically set with intelligence measured
family environment, 302 reference to a judgment using a normed
fatalism: The belief that what concerning a minimum instrument rises each year
happens level of profi ciency after the test was normed,
in life is largely out of a required to be included in usually in the absence of
person’s control, 473 a particular classifi any academic dividend,
Federal Rules of Evidence, cation; contrast with 299–300
60 fi eld dependent and relative cut score, 226 focal lesion, 514 focus
independent people, 26 fi xed reference group group: Qualitative research
fi eld-of-search item: A type scoring system: A system conducted with a group of
of of scoring wherein the respondents who typically
test item used in ability distribution of scores have been screened to
and neurodiagnostic tests obtained on the test from qualify for participation in
wherein the testtaker’s one group of testtakers the research,
task is to locate a match (the fi xed reference 587–588 foils, 245
to a visually presented group) is used as the basis forced distribution
stimulus, for the calculation of test technique: A procedure
528–529 fi gure drawing scores for future entailing the distribution of
test: A general reference to a administrations; the SAT a predetermined number or
type of test in which the and the percentage of assessees into
testtaker’s task is to draw a GRE are scored this way, various categories that
human fi gure and/or other fi 121–122 describe performance (such
gures, and inferences are then fl exibility, 342 fl exible as categories ranging from
made about the testtaker’s battery: Best associated with “unsatisfactory” to
ability, personality, and/or neuropsychological “superior”), 572 forced-
neurological intactness on the assessment, a group of tests choice format: A type of item
basis of the fi gure(s) hand-picked by the assessor sometimes used in
produced, 444–448, 504 to provide an answer to the personality tests wherein
fi ndings, right to be referral question; contrast each of two or more choices
informed of, 67–68 with fi xed battery, 538 – has been predetermined to be
fi rst moments of 539 equal in social desirability,
distribution, 128 fi t fl oor, 317 fl oor effect: A 396
statistics, 335 phenomenon arising from forensic psychological
fi xed battery: A the diminished utility of a assessment: The theory
prepackaged test tool of assessment in and application of
battery containing a distinguishing testtakers at psychological evaluation
number of the low end of the ability,
and management in a his or her thoughts as they Gas Chromatography/Mass
legal context, 490 occur, Spectrometry (GCMS)
of competence to stand 441n5 frequency Test, 569
trial, 492, distributions: A tabular GATB. See General
494–495 of criminal listing of scores along Aptitude Test Battery
responsibility, 495–496 with the number of times GCMS Test. See Gas
of dangerousness to each score occurred, 78 Chromatography/ Mass
oneself or others, 491– graphs of, Spectrometry Test GCR. See
494 80, 82, 83 group conformity rating
of emotional injury, 497– grouped, 79 gender
498 general clinical shapes of, intelligence testing and,
practice v., 490 – 491 80, 82 301–302 societal standards
profi ling, 498 of simple, 78 of, 51
readiness for parole or frequency polygon: A General Aptitude Test
probation, graphic illustration of Battery (GATB) controversy
496–497 formal data wherein numbers over, 551, 555 introduction
evaluation: A indicating frequency are of, 550 validity
typically set on the vertical axis, generalization and, 552–554
systematic, “on-the- test scores or categories General Electric Co. v.
record” assessment are set on the horizontal Joiner, 61 generalizability
leading to a diagnosis, axis, and the data are study: In the context of
opinion, or described by a generalizability theory,
recommendation for continuous line research conducted to
intervention, or other connecting the points explore the impact of
course of action that is where the test scores or different facets of the
conducted by a qualifi ed categories meet universe on a test score, 158
person in an unoffi cial frequencies, 80–81 generalizability theory: Also
context and subject to frequency recording, referred to as domain
ethical and other 455 Freud, Sigmund, sampling theory, a system
professional standards; 37n1, 49, 64 of assumptions about
contrast with informal Frye v. United States, 60 – measurement that
evaluation, 347 61 FSIQ. See Full Scale IQ includes the notion that a
format: A general reference Full Scale IQ (FSIQ), 167– test score (and even a
to the form, plan, 168 functional analysis: In response to an individual
structure, arrangement, or behavioral assessment, the item) consists of a
layout of test items as process of identifying the relatively stable
well as to related dependent and independent component that actually
considerations such as variables with respect to a is what the test or
time limits for test presenting problem, 460 individual item is
administration, 5 designed to measure as
frame of reference: In the g factor: In Spearman’s two- well as relatively unstable
context of item format, factor theory of intelligence, components that
aspects of the focus the general factor of collectively can be
of the item such as the intelligence; also, the factor accounted for as error,
time frame that is measured to greater or 157–158
(past, present, or future), lesser degrees by all tests of
generosity error: Also
395, 397 Frank, Jerome, 413 intelligence; contrast with s referred to as leniency error,
Franz Ferdinand, Archduke, factor and group factors, a less than accurate rating or
178, 180 free association: A 283 , 286–288, 301 Galton,
evaluation by a rater due to
Francis, 37, 127, 279–280,
technique, most frequently that rater’s general tendency
used in psychoanalysis, 291 to be lenient or insuffi ciently
wherein the subject relates all Garruto, John, 286 critical; contrast with
severity error, 202 , 387 Management Admission group-related test-score
genogram: A graphic Test, 364 adjustment, 205–207
representation of themes and Graduate Record Grutter v. Bollinger, 58 – 59
behavioral patterns in Examination (GRE), Guantanamo Bay,
successive generations of a 98, 359, 361–362 391–392 Guess Who?
family that is used as a tool graph: A diagram or chart technique, 375
of evaluation and composed of lines, points, guessing, 263–264
intervention, 448 bars, or other symbols that Guidance Information
Georgetown criteria for describe and illustrate data, System (GIS 3.0), 549
competency to stand trial, 80–81, 82, 83, 129–135 Guilford, J. P., 297, 379–380
492, 494 Guilford-Zimmerman
geriatric settings, 22 Temperament Survey,
Gesell, Arnold, 293–294 555
I-11
GF-Gc: Fluid-crystallized Guttman scale: Named for its
intelligence as described GRE. See Graduate Record
developer, a scale
in the Cattell-Horn Examination group wherein items range
model, Carroll’s three- conformity rating sequentially from weaker
stratum theory, and other (GCR), to stronger expressions of
models, 285–287 438–439 group the attitude or belief
giftedness: Performance that diagnostic tests, 368 group being measured,
is consistently remarkable factors: According to 242–243
in any positively valued Spearman, factors common
area, 298, 374 to a group of activities Hall, C. S., 378–379 Hall,
GIS 3.0. See Guidance indicating intelligence, such Stanley G., 546 halo effect:
Information as linguistic, mechanical, or A type of rating error
System giveaway item: A arithmetic abilities, 283 wherein the rater views the
test item, usually near the group intelligence object of the rating with
beginning of a test of ability tests in military, extreme favor and tends to
or achievement, designed to 336–340 pros bestow ratings infl ated in a
be relatively easy—usually and cons of, 341 positive direction; a set of
for the purpose of building in schools, 340– circumstances resulting in a
the testtaker’s confi dence or 341 rater’s tendency to be
lessening test-related anxiety, grouped frequency positively disposed and
255n4 distribution: Also referred insuffi ciently critical,
Goal Instability Scale, 560 to as class intervals, a 202–203, 387
Goddard, Henry H., 42– tabular summary of test Halstead, Ward C., 538
46, 278, 294 scores in which the test Halstead-Reitan
Goldstein-Scheerer Tests of scores are grouped by Neuropsychological
Abstract and Concrete intervals, 79 Battery: A widely used fi
Thinking, 515–516 groupthink: Collective xed neuropsychological
governmental credentialing, decisionmaking test battery based on the
22–23 GPA. See grade characterized more by a work of Ward Halstead
point average grade norms: drive toward consensus and Ralph Reitan, 538,
Norms specifi cally than critical analysis 540–541
designed as a reference in and evaluation, which hand grip test,
the context of the grade of may lead to less 76–77 Hand
the testtaker who achieved a reasoned and riskier Test, 397, 438
particular score; contrast decisions than those Hand-Tool Dexterity Test,
with age norms, 119 – 120 that might have been 548
grade point average made by an individual
(GPA), 184 grade-based making the same
scale, 237 Graduate decision, 10
I-12
hard sign: In academic and applied assumes a pattern of behavior
neuropsychological traditions, 41 antiquity to that is characteristic of other
assessment, an indicator nineteenth century, people; (2) thoughts,
of defi nite neurological 35–38 feelings, or behavior on the
defi cit, such as an intelligence part of one person that
abnormal refl ex testing, 39–40 resonates in some familiar
response; contrast with twentieth century, way with the experiences of
soft sign, 517 38–41 another person, 422
Hare, Robert D., 497 history taking, 519–521 identity: A set of cognitive
Hathaway, Starke R., HIT. See Holtzman Inkblot and behavioral
406, 408, 410 health Technique hit rate: The characteristics by which
care, 487–488 Health proportion of people who individuals defi ne
Insurance Portability and are accurately identifi ed as themselves as members
Accountability Act possessing or not of a particular group;
(HIPAA), 69 health possessing a particular trait, one’s sense of self, 422
psychology: A specialty behavior, characteristic, or idiographic approach: An
area of psychology that attribute based on test approach to assessment
focuses on understanding scores, 189, 191 characterized by efforts to
the role of psychological Holland, John, 382 learn about each individual’s
variables in the onset, Holtzman Inkblot Technique unique constellation of
course, treatment, and (HIT), personality traits, with no
prevention of illness, 430n3 attempt to characterize each
disease, and disability, 23 homogeneity, 147, person according to any
health-related quality of life 153, 194–195 particular set of traits;
(HRQOL), 165–166 Hopwood v. State of contrast with nomothetic
Hereditary Genius ( Galton), Texas, 571 approach, 398 Immunoassay
291 heterogeneity, 147, 153 Horn Art Aptitude Inventory, Test, 569 imperial
hierarchical model: A term 363 examinations, 36 implicit
usually applied to a House-Tree-Person (HTP) attitude: A nonconscious,
theoretical model organized test, 446–447 automatic association in
into two or more layers, with HRQOL. See health-related memory that produces a
each layer subsumed by or quality of life disposition to react in some
incorporated in the preceding HTP test. See House-Tree- characteristic manner to a
layer; for example, Carroll’s Person test Hutt, Max, particular stimulus, 583
three-stratum theory of 531–532 hypnotic Implicit Attitude Test (IAT),
cognitive abilities is a interview: An interview 583 implicit memory:
hierarchical model with g as conducted after a hypnotic Memory that is outside of
the top layer followed by two state has been induced in conscious control and
layers of cognitive abilities the interviewee, most accessible only by indirect
and processes, 285 typically in an effort to measures, 536
HIPAA. See Health enhance concentration, implicit motive: A
Insurance focus, imagery, and nonconscious infl
Portability and recall, 475 uence on behavior,
Accountability Act hired typically acquired on
guns, 64 histogram: A graph IAT. See Implicit the basis of experience,
with vertical lines drawn at Attitude Test ICC. See 437
the true limits of each test item characteristic curve impression management:
score (or class interval), IDEA: Individuals with Attempting to
forming a series of Disabilities manipulate others’
contiguous rectangles, 80–81 Education Act, 351–352 opinions and
historical perspective identifi cation: (1) A process impressions through the
by which an individual selective exposure of
some information, child under 3 years of age processing; successive
including false who needs early processing
information, usually intervention service informed consent:
coupled with the because of developmental Permission to proceed
suppression of other delays or a diagnosed with a (typically)
information; in physical or mental diagnostic, evaluative, or
responding to self-report condition that has a high therapeutic service on
measures of personality, probability of resulting in the basis of knowledge
psychopathology, or developmental delay, 345– about the service and its
achievement, impression 346 risks and potential benefi
management may be inference: A logical result or ts, 67
synonymous with a inkblots. See also Rorschach
attempts to deduction in a reasoning inkblots
“fake good” or “fake process, in Color Inkblot
bad,” 390 in-basket 124, 172 infl ation of Therapeutic Storytelling,
technique: A measurement range: Also referred to as 448 Holtzman, 430n3
technique used to assess infl ation of variance, a personality assessment
managerial ability and reference to a phenomenon with, 427–432
organizational skills that associated with reliability inquiry: A typical element of
entails a timed simulation of estimates wherein the Rorschach test
the way a manager or variance of either variable administration; following
executive deals with an in- in a correlational analysis is the initial presentation of
basket fi lled with infl ated by the sampling all ten cards, the assessor
mail, memos, procedure used and so the asks specifi c questions
announcements, and other resulting correlation coeffi designed, among other
notices and directives, 564 cient tends to be higher; things, to determine what
incidental sampling: Also contrast with restriction of about each card led to the
referred to as convenience range, assessee’s perceptions,
sampling, the process of 153 – 154 , 183 428
arbitrarily selecting some informal evaluation: A insanity: A legal term
people to be part of a sample typically nonsystematic, denoting an inability to
because they are readily relatively brief, and “off- tell right from wrong, a
available, not because they the-record” assessment lack of control, or a state
are most representative of the leading to the formation of of other mental
population being studied, an opinion or attitude, incompetence or disorder
112, 116 conducted by any person in suffi cient to prevent that
incremental validity: Used in any way for any reason, in person from standing
conjunction with an unoffi cial context and trial, being judged guilty,
predictive validity, an not subject to the same or entering into a contract
index of the explanatory ethics or standards as or other legal
power of additional evaluation by a professional; relationship, 495
predictors over and above contrast with formal instrumental values: Guiding
the predictors already in evaluation, 21 , 348 principles in the
use, 184–185 information function, 162– attainment of some
indirect estimation, 243 164 information objective—for example,
individual intelligence test, processing styles: A way honesty and ambition;
141–142, 335–336 of looking at intelligence contrast with terminal
Individuals with Disabilities that focuses on how values, 419
Education information is processed integrative report: A form
Act. See IDEA infant rather than what is of interpretive report of
or toddler with a disability: processed, 283, 288–289. psychological
According to IDEA, a See also simultaneous assessment, usually
computer-generated, in 279, 292–297 observable, interactionism: The belief
which data from 278 sensory abilities and, that heredity and
behavioral, medical, 279–280 social outcomes environment interact to
administrative, and/or of, 309 stability of, 295– infl uence the
other sources are 297 two-factor theory of, development of one’s
integrated; contrast with 283–284, mental capacity and
scoring report and 286–288, 301 types of, abilities, 282, 295
interpretive report, 13 284–285 Wechsler on, intercept: In the equation for
integrity test: A screening 40, 280–281, 286, 290, a regression line, Y a
instrument designed to 291, 300, 319, 322, 324 bX, the letter a,
predict who will and will intelligence testing. See which stands for a
not be an honest also StanfordBinet constant indicating
employee, Intelligence Scale; where the line crosses
556–557 intelligence: A Wechsler intelligence tests the vertical or Y -axis,
multifaceted capacity that absolute zero point and, 133
manifests itself in different 76 age and, 289–291, intercept bias: A reference to
ways across the life span 296–297 construct the intercept of a
but in general includes the validity of, 297 cost- regression line exhibited
abilities and capacities to effectiveness of, 110 by a test or measurement
acquire and apply cultural issues of, 42–46, procedure that
knowledge, to reason 69, 302–308 culture systematically
effectively and logically, to loading in, 303–306 underpredicts or
exhibit sound judgment, to culture-fair, 304, 306–307 overpredicts the
be perceptive, intuitive, developers of, 310 performance of members
mentally alert, and able to fi examiner’s role in, 343 of a group; contrast with
nd the right words and factors infl uencing, 299– slope bias, 200
thoughts with facility, and 308 family environment
to be able to cope with and and, 302 Flynn effect in,
adjust to new situations and 299–300 gender and, 301–
new types of problems, 277 302 general principles of, I-13
ability clusters in, 292 age- 484 group, 336–341 interest inventories, 376–
related decline in, 296 historical perspective of, 377, 545–548 inter-item
APA on, 308 of children, 39–40 individual, 141– consistency: The
289–291, 296–297, 297n2 142, 335–336 of infants, consistency or
complexity of, 280 349 IQ and, 98–99, homogeneity of the items
controversy over, 308–309 119n3, 167–168 in of a test, estimated by
crystallized, 285–287 neuropsychological techniques such as the
emotional, 284 expert assessment, split-half method, 147,
views of, 278–283 factor- 524–525 normal 256–257
analytic theories of, 282– curve and, 94–96 internal consistency estimate
288 fl uid, 285–287 of personality and, 299– of reliability: An estimate
gifted, 296–299 300 profi le analysis of the reliability of a test
information-processing and, 382n1 purpose obtained from a measure
view of, 283, of, 291 specifi c of inter-item consistency,
288–289 abilities measured 145–150, 153 coeffi
interpersonal and social by, cient alpha and, 149–150
aspects of, 279 341–343 in item-reliability index
intrapersonal, 284 lay standard battery, and, 256–257 KR-20
public views of, 278–279 481–482 tasks used and, 148–149 split-half
motivation and, 278 in, 289–291 theory reliability and, 145–147
multiple-factor models of, in, 291–292 internal locus of control,
284 nature v. nurture and, 392–393 interpersonal
intelligence: In Gardner’s to every other and there work; contrast with
theory of multiple is no absolute zero point extrinsic motivation, 576
intelligences, the ability to (which precludes involuntary hospitalization,
understand other people, mathematical operations 214 ipsative scoring: An
what motivates them, how on such data), 7 5–76 approach to test scoring and
they work, and how to work interview: A tool of interpretation wherein the
cooperatively with them; assessment in which testtaker’s responses and the
contrast with intrapersonal information is gathered presumed strength of a
intelligence, 284 through direct, reciprocal measured trait are interpreted
Interpersonal Support communication, 8 relative to the measured
Evaluations in clinical/counseling strength of other traits for
List, 560 interpretive assessment, that testtaker; contrast with
report: A formal or offi cial 473–479 criterion- class scoring and cumulative
computer-generated account related validity of, 479 scoring, 253–254
of test performance presented cultural aspects of, IQ (intelligence quotient): A
in both numeric and narrative 486–487 widely used, shorthand
form and including an reference to intelligence
explanation of the fi ndings; that echoes back from
the three varieties of days now long gone when
interpretive report are I-14 a testtaker’s mental age
descriptive, screening, and in employment as determined by a test
consultative; contrast with assessment, 563 in was divided by
scoring report and neuropsychological chronological age and
integrative report, 13 assessment, multiplied by 100 to
interquartile range: An 521–522 in determine the
ordinal statistic of psychological “intelligence quotient,”
variability equal to the assessment, 7–9 98–99, 119n3, 167–168,
difference between the psychometric aspects 313. See also
third and fi rst quartile of, 478–479 standard intelligence
points in a distribution questions in, 476 styles adoption and, 294
that has been divided into of, 9 types of, 8, 474– deviation, 313
quartiles, 88 478 ratio, 313
inter-scorer reliability: Also intrapersonal intelligence: In Wechsler tests for,
referred to as inter-rater Gardner’s theory of 280–281
reliability, observer multiple intelligences, a IRT. See item response
reliability, judge capacity to form accurate theory Ishihara test, 530
reliability, and scorer self-perceptions, to item analysis: A general
reliability, an estimate of discriminate accurately term to describe various
the degree of agreement between emotions, and to procedures, usually
or consistency between be able to draw upon statistical, designed to
two or more scorers (or one’s emotions as a explore how individual test
judges or raters or means of understanding items work as compared to
observers), 150–151, and an effective guide; other items in the test and in
153, 156 contrast with the context of the whole test
interval recording, interpersonal (e.g., to explore the level of
455 interval scale: A intelligence, 284 diffi culty of individual
system of intrinsic motivation: A state items on an achievement
measurement in which all in which the primary test or the reliability of a
things measured can be force driving an personality test); contrast
rank-ordered into equal individual comes from with qualitative item
intervals, where every within, such as personal analysis, 233
unit on the scale is equal satisfaction with one’s
fairness in, 264 require testtakers to select a item-diffi culty index: In
guessing in, 263– response from existing achievement or ability
264 item alternative responses or to testing and other contexts
characteristic curves construct a response, 244– in which responses are
in, 245, keyed correct, a statistic
260–263, 264 249, 396 item pool: The indicating how many
item-diffi culty index in, reservoir or well from testtakers responded
255–256 item- which items will or will not correctly to an item; in
discrimination index in, be drawn for the fi nal contexts where the nature
258–260 item- version of the test; the of the test is such that
endorsement index in, collection of items to be responses are not keyed
256 item-reliability further evaluated for correct, this same statistic
index in, 256–257 item- possible selection for use in may be referred to as an
validity index in, 257– an item bank, item-endorsement index,
258 procedures, 195 244, 268 item 255 – 256
qualitative, 265–267 response curve. See item-discrimination index:
speed tests and, 264– item characteristic A statistic designed to
265 in test development, curve indicate how adequately
233, 255–267 item response theory (IRT): a test item discriminates
item bank: A collection of Also referred to as between high and low
questions to be used in latent-trait theory or the scorers, 258–260
the construction of tests, latent-trait model, a item-endorsement index: In
248, 250–252, 274–275 system of assumptions personality assessment
item branching: In about measurement and other contexts in
computerized adaptive (including the assumption which the nature of the
testing, the individualized that a trait being test is such that
presentation of test items measured by a test is responses are not keyed
drawn from an item bank unidimensional) and the correct or incorrect, a
based on the testtaker’s extent to which each test statistic indicating how
previous responses, 252– item measures the trait, many testtakers
253 158 responded to an item in
item characteristic curve assumptions in using, a particular direction; in
(ICC): A graphic 161 cut score setting achievement tests, which
representation of the and, 230–231 HRQOL have responses that are
probabilistic relationship and, 165–166 in keyed correct, this
between a person’s level practice, 162–164 statistic is referred to as
on a trait (or ability or reliability and, 158–160 an item-diffi culty index,
other characteristic being TAT data and, 468 in 256
measured) and the test development, 260, item-mapping method: An
probability for 273–275 IRTbased method of
responding to an item in a item sampling: Also referred setting cut scores that
predicted way; also to as content sampling, entails a histographic
known as a category the variety of the subject representation of test
response curve, an item matter contained in the items and expert
response curve, or an items; frequently referred judgments regarding
item trace line, to in the context of the item effectiveness, 231
162 , 260–263, 264 item variation between item-reliability index: A
format: A reference to the individual test items in a statistic designed to
form, plan, structure, test or between test items provide an indication of a
arrangement, or layout of in two or more tests, 140 test’s internal
individual test items, item trace line. See item consistency; the higher
including whether the items characteristic curve the item-reliability index,
the greater the test’s The Kallikak Family at) of the center of a
internal consistency, 256– (Goddard), 45, 294 distribution, 92
257 Kaufman Assessment
item-validity index: A latent-trait theory: Also
Battery for
statistic indicating the referred to as latent-trait
Children (K-ABC), 288,
degree to which a test model, a system of
368–371 KDS. See Kinetic
measures what it assumptions about
Drawing System measurement, including the
purports to measure; the Kent-Rosanoff Free
higher the itemvalidity assumption that a trait being
Association Test, measured by a test is
index, the greater the 441–442
test’s criterion-related unidimensional, and the
KeyMath Revised test, 367– extent to which each test
validity, 368
257– item measures the trait, 158
KFD. See Kinetic Family Laurent, Jeff, 72 law
258 items Drawing
for computer enforcement agencies, 493
Kinetic Drawing System Law School Admission Test
administration, 248–249, (KDS), 447
252–253 (LSAT),
Kinetic Family Drawing 58, 364
DIF, 274 ”good,” 254– (KFD), 447 Kinetic School
255 in personality laws: Rules that individuals
Drawing (KSD), 447 known must obey because they
assessment, 393–396 groups method: Also referred
scoring of, 253–254 are deemed to be good for
to as the method of society as a whole;
writing of, 244–253 contrasting groups, a system contrast with ethics, 5 3
Jackson Vocational Interest of collecting data on a –45,
Survey, 549 predictor of interest from 56–59, 345
Jaffee v. groups known to possess Lawshe, C. H., 177–178
Redmond, 69 (and Lazarus, Arnold, 588
Jeffery, Diana D., not to possess) a trait, leaderless group technique:
49, 50 job attribute, or ability of A situational assessment
applicant pool, interest, 196–197, 229– procedure wherein an
225 job 230 observer/assessor evaluates
complexity, 225 KOIS. See Kuder the performance of assessees
job satisfaction: A Occupational Interest in a group situation with
pleasurable or positive Survey regard to variables such as
emotional state resulting KR-20. See Kuder- leadership, initiative, and
from the appraisal of Richardson formulas cooperation, 461, 564
one’s job or job KSD. See Kinetic School Leadership Q-Test, 395
experience, 577–578 Drawing learning disability: A
job-related performance Kuder, G. Frederic, 148 disorder involving a
sample, 563 Johnson, Kuder Occupational Interest discrepancy between ability
Wendy, 295 Survey (KOIS), 549 and achievement, which may
Joint Committee of Testing Kuder-Richardson formulas: manifest itself in attentional,
Practices, 62 journal articles, A series of equations emotional, perceptual, and/or
31–32, 33 J-shaped curve, 82 developed by G. F. Kuder motor defi cits and/or in
Julius, Steve, 136 and M. W. Richardson problems related to doing
Jung, Carl, 382, 441, 557 designed to estimate the mathematical calculations,
inter-item consistency of reading, writing, spelling, or
K-ABC. See Kaufman tests, 148–149, 154 Kumho using or understanding
Assessment Battery for Tire Company Ltd. v. spoken or written language;
Children Kaiser, Robert Carmichael, 61 kurtosis: An not applicable to persons
B., 573 indication of the nature of the who have academic problems
steepness (peaked versus fl that are cultural or economic
in origin or to persons who relationship to the the test was originally
have learning problems original score and (b) the validated, 173
arising primarily from visual, magnitude of the locator test: A pretest or
hearing, or motor handicaps routing test, usually for
or mental retardation, 351, determining the most
353 appropriate level of test,
I-15
Learning Potential 352
Assessment Device linear transformation: locus of control: The self-
(LPAD), 364 least (continued) difference perceived
stigmatizing label, between the new score source of what happens
69–70 legal issues and other scores on the to oneself,
expert witnesses, 59–61 scale parallels the 392
general principles of, 484 magnitude of
LPAD. See Learning
laws, 53–54, 56–59 differences between the
Potential
litigation, 56–57, 59–61 original score and the
Assessment Device
preschool assessment and, other scores on the
scales from which it LSAT. See Law School
345 public opinion and, 54– Admission Test lumbar
56 Leisure Satisfaction was derived; contrast
puncture: A diagnostic
Scale, 560 leniency error: with nonlinear
transformation, 98 – 99 procedure typically
Also referred to as a performed by a neurologist
generosity error, a rating linguistic barriers, 48
in which spinal fl uid is
error that occurs as the result Lipinski, Tara, 296
extracted from the spinal
of a rater’s tendency to be literature reviews, 589–
column by means of an
too forgiving and insuffi 590 litigation, signifi
inserted needle; also
ciently critical, 202, 387 cant, 56–57, 59–61 referred to as a spinal tap,
leptokurtic: A description of LNNB. See Luria-Nebraska 543
the kurtosis of a Neuropsychological Luria-Nebraska
distribution that is Battery local norms: Neuropsychological
relatively peaked in its Normative information Battery (LNNB), 540
center, 92 about some limited
lesion: A pathological population, frequently of MacAndrew Alcoholism
alteration of specifi c interest to the test Scale
tissue as might result user, 121 (MAC-R), 489
from injury or infection, local processing: On-site, Machover, Karen, 445–446
514 computerized MAC-R. See MacAndrew
letter of application, scoring, interpretation, or Alcoholism
561 licensing, 236 other conversion of raw Scale mail surveys,
Life Satisfaction test data; contrast with 585 maintained abilities:
Index A, 560 central processing and In the CattellHorn model
Likert scale: Named for its teleprocessing, 13 of intelligence, cognitive
developer, a summative local validation study: The abilities that do not
rating scale with fi ve process of gathering decline with age and tend
alternative responses ranging evidence, relevant to how to return to pre-injury
on a continuum from, for well a test measures what levels after brain damage;
example, “strongly agree” to it purports to measure, for contrast with vulnerable
“strongly disagree,” 240–241 the purpose of evaluating abilities, 285
Lindzey, G., 378–379 linear the validity of a test or malingering, 474, 477
transformation: In other measurement tool;
psychometrics, a process typically undertaken in
of changing a score such conjunction with a
population different from I-16
that (a) the new score has
a direct numerical the population for whom
mall intercept studies, 584 derived by calculating an mechanical prediction: The
managed care: A health average of all scores in a application
care system wherein the distribution, 0, 84, 8 86 of computer algorithms
products and services measure of central tendency: together with statistical
provided to patients by a One of three statistics rules and probabilities to
participating network of indicating the average or generate fi ndings and
health care providers are middlemost score recommendations;
mediated by an between the extreme contrast
administrative agency of scores in a distribution; with clinical prediction
the insurer that works to the mean is a measure of and actuarial prediction,
keep costs down by fi xing central tendency and a
schedules of reimbursement statistic at the ratio level 508 – 510
to providers, of measurement, the median: A measure of central
median is a measure of tendency derived by
487–488
central tendency that identifying the
Management Progress Study
takes into account the middlemost score in a
(MPS),
order of scores and is distribution,
567–568
ordinal in nature, and the 84–85
Marital Interaction Coding
mode is a measure of Medical and Psychiatric
System, 459
central tendency that is Inventory. See
Marital Satisfaction Scale
nominal in nature, 80–83 Minnesota Multiphasic
(MSS), 195, 196–198
arithmetic mean, Personality
Marlow-Crowne Social
80, 84, 86 median, Inventory (MMPI)
Desirability Scale, 197
84–85 mode, 85– Medical College Admission
Maslach Burnout Inventory
87 Test
(MBI), 577
measure of variability: A (MCAT), 363–364
Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, medical diagnostic aids,
575–576 MAT. See Miller statistic indicating how
scores in a distribution 542–543 Meehl, Paul,
Analogies Test matching
are scattered or dispersed; 410 Meier Art
item, 245–246, 249 math
range, standard deviation, Judgment Test, 27
tests, 367–368 mazes, 527
and variance are common memory
MBI. See Maslach Burnout
Inventory MBTI. See measures of variability, model of,
87 535 tests
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
average deviation, 88–89 of, 534–538
MCAT. See Medical College
interquartile and semi- types of,
Admission Test
interquartile 534–536
McGrew, Kevin, S., 287
ranges, 88 mental age: An index, now
McGrew-Flanagan CHC
range, 87 standard seldom used, that refers
model, to the chronological age
287–288 deviation, 89–91
measurement: Assigning equivalent of one’s
McKinley, John Charnley, performance on a test or
406, 408, 410 numbers or symbols to
characteristics of people subtest; derived by
MCMI-III. See Million reference to norms
or objects according to
Clinical Multiaxial indicating the age at
Inventory-III rules, 72
equivalence, across which most testtakers can
MCT. See Minnesota pass or meet some
testtaker
Clerical Test performance criterion
populations, 273–274
MDBS-R. See Morally with respect to individual
Debatable error in, 73
inference from, or groups of items, 1 19,
Behaviors Scale- 290
Revised mean: Also called 136–138 rules
of, 72 scales of, Mental Measurements
the arithmetic mean, a Yearbook (Buros),
measure of central tendency 72–77
31, 33 Miller Analogies Test behavior, characteristic, or
mental status examination: (MAT), 362–363 attribute; a “miss” in this
A specialized interview and Million Clinical Multiaxial context is an inaccurate
observation used to screen InventoryIII (MCMI-III), classifi cation or prediction;
for intellectual, emotional, 480 may be subdivided into false
and neurological defi cits by Mills v. Board of Education positives and false negatives,
touching on areas such as of District of Columbia, 59 190
the interviewee’s Milner, Joel, 192 Mini- MMPI. See Minnesota
appearance, behavior, Mental State Exam, 522 Multiphasic Personality
memory, affect, mood, minimum competency Inventory
judgment, personality, testing program: Formal M’Naghten standard: Also
thought content, thought evaluation program in basic known as the “right or
processes, and state of skills such as reading, wrong” test
consciousness, 476–477, writing, and arithmetic of insanity, a (since
522 Merrill, Maude, 311 designed to aid in replaced) standard that
mesokurtic: A description of educational decision making hinged on whether an
the kurtosis of a distribution that ranges from remediation individual knew right
that is neither extremely to graduation, from wrong at the time of
peaked nor fl at in its center, 57, 355–356 commission of a crime;
92 Minnesota Clerical Test contrast with the
meta-analysis: A family of (MCT), 564 Durham standard and the
techniques used to Minnesota Multiphasic ALI standard, 496
statistically combine Personality mode: A measure of central
information across Inventory (MMPI), 393 tendency derived by
studies to produce single for adolescents (MMPI- identifying the most
estimates of the statistics A), 416–417 clinical frequently occurring
being studied, 137 scales in, 406–407, 411, score in a distribution,
method of contrasted groups. 413–415, 417 content 85–87
See known groups scales in, 409 criterion Montreal Neurological
method groups and, 406–412 Institute Battery, 540
method of paired restructured form of Morally Debatable Behaviors
comparisons: Scaling (MMPI-2-RF), ScaleRevised (MDBS-R),
method whereby one of a 412–418, 489 revised 239–242 Morgan, Christiana
pair of stimuli (such as (MMPI-2), 410–412, D., 41, 432, 434 motivation,
photos) is selected 417–418, 482 Rorschach employment assessment and,
according to a rule (such test v., 432 574–577
as “select the one that is supplementary scales in, motivation research methods:
more appealing”), 241– 409, 417 T scores in, 97, Tools and procedures
242 412 validity scales in, (e.g., in-depth interviews
method of predictive yield: A 408, 417 and focus groups),
technique for identifying Minnesota Teacher Attitude typically qualitative,
cut scores based on the Survey, 582 associated with consumer
number of positions to be Minnesota Vocational research to explore
fi lled, 231 Interest consumer attitudes,
Metropolitan Readiness Inventory, 548 minority behavior, and motivation,
Tests (MRTs), cultures, 47, 205–207, 302– 586–591
359–361 military 308 miss rate: The proportion motor defi cits, 514–515
settings, 22, 26, 336–340, of people a test or other motor test: A general
384 measurement procedure fails reference to a type of
leadership and, 395, 462 to identify accurately with instrument or evaluation
terrorism and, 391–392 respect to the possession or procedure used to obtain
exhibition of a trait, information about one’s
ability to move one’s limbs, evidence by means of a nature-nurture question, 42–
eyes, or other parts of the table of correlations 43, 46, 279 controversy
body (psychomotor ability) between traits and over, 295 intelligence and,
as opposed to abilities that methods, 198 279, 292–297
are more strictly cognitive, Murray, Henry A., 41, 432, interactionism and, 295
behavioral, or sensory in 434–435, predeterminism and, 293–
nature, 443, 567 muscle 294 preformationism and,
530–533 coordination, 523 292–293 VPR model and,
MPS. See Management Myers, Isabel Briggs, 295
Progress Study 557–558 Naylor-Shine tables:
MRTs. See Metropolitan Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Statistical tables once
Readiness Tests MSS. See (MBTI), 382, 557–558 widely used to assist in
Marital Satisfaction Scale judging the utility of a
multidimensional scale, 237, narrow-band measures, 459 particular test, 188, 224
241 Multilingual Aphasia NASA. See National NCCEA. See Neurosensory
Examination, 534 multiple Aeronautics and Space Center
cut scores: The use of two or Administration Comprehensive
more cut scores with NASP. See National Examination of
reference to one predictor for Association of School Aphasia need: According
the purpose of categorizing Psychologists to personality theorist Henry
testtakers into more than two National Aeronautics and Murray, determinants of
groups, or the use of a Space behavior arising from within
different cut score for each Administration (NASA), the individual; contrast with
predictor when using 566 national anchor norms: the
multiple predictors for An Murrayan concept of
selection, 226 multiple equivalency table for press, 435 negative skew, 82,
hurdles: A multistage scores on two nationally 90, 91 neglect: Failure on the
decision-making process in standardized tests part of an adult responsible
which the achievement of a designed to measure the for the care of another to
particular cut score on one same thing, 120–121 exercise a minimum degree
test is necessary in order to National Association of of care in providing food,
advance to the next stage of School Psychologists clothing, shelter, education,
evaluation in the selection (NASP), 24 medical care, and
process, 226–228 National Defense Education supervision; contrast with
multiple regression: The Act, 55 abuse, 502 – 505
analysis of relationships National Education NEO PI-R. See Revised
between more than one Association (NEA), NEO
independent variable and 61–62 national norms: Personality Inventory
one dependent variable to Norms derived from a
understand how each standardization sample that
independent variable was nationally representative
predicts the dependent of the population, 120 I-17
variable, 135 naturalistic observation: nervous system, behavior
multiple-choice format, 245, Behavioral observation and, 512–517
249 multiple-factor that takes place in a neurodevelopment training
intelligence models, 284 naturally occurring ball, 27 neurological
multitrait-multimethod setting (as opposed to a damage: Impairment, injury,
matrix: A method of research laboratory) for harm, or loss of function of
evaluating construct validity the purpose of any part or process of the
by simultaneously evaluation and central or peripheral nervous
examining both information-gathering, systems,
convergent and divergent 380
513–517 neurology: A various possible defi noneconomic benefi ts (in the
branch of medicine that ciencies in brain-behavior context of utility), 213–
focuses on the nervous functioning, 522 214
system and its disorders; neuropsychology: A branch noneconomic costs (in the
contrast with of psychology that context of utility), 211
neuropsychology, 512 focuses on the noninvasive procedures: A
neuron: Nerve cell, 512 relationship between method of evaluation or
neuropsychological brain functioning and treatment that does not
assessment: The evaluation behavior; contrast with involve intrusion (by
of brain and nervous system neurology, 512 surgical procedure, X-
functioning as it relates to Neurosensory Center ray, or other means) into
behavior, 512 Comprehensive the body; for example, in
content and nature of, 517– Examination of Aphasia a neuropsychological
519 executive function (NCCEA), evaluation, observation of
tests in, 526–530 general 540 the client walking or
intelligence and ability neurotology: A branch of skipping, 522
tests medicine that focuses on nonlinear transformation: In
in, 524–525 problems relating to psychometrics, a process
general principles of, 484 hearing, balance, and of changing a score such
history taking, case history, facial nerves, 512 that (a) the new score
and case noir acronym, 73–74 does not necessarily have
studies in, 519–521 nominal scale: A system of a direct numerical
interview in, 521–522 measurement in which all relationship to the
medical diagnostic aids things measured are classifi original score and (b) the
and, 542–543 memory tests ed or categorized based on magnitude of the
in, 534–538 mental status one or more distinguishing differences between the
examination in, 522 characteristics and placed new score and the other
nervous system, behavior into mutually exclusive and scores on the scale may
and, exhaustive categories, 74, 76 not parallel the
512–517 magnitude of differences
neuropsychological tests between the original
in, 524 perceptual, motor, score and the other scores
and perceptualmotor I-18 on the scales from which
function tests in, 530– nominating technique: A the original score was
533 method of peer appraisal derived; contrast with
physical examination in, in which members of a linear transformation, 99
522–524 purpose of, 519 class, team, work unit, nonverbal communication,
signs in, 517 of special or other type of group 48–49 norm: (1) Behavior or
populations, 543–544 test are asked to select (or performance that is usual,
of ability to abstract in, nominate) people in average, normal, standard,
525–526 test batteries response to a question or expected, or typical; (2)
and, 481–482, 538–543 statement, 299, 375–376 singular form of norms, 108,
verbal functioning tests nomothetic approach: An 111.
in, 533–534 approach to assessment See also norms normal
Neuropsychological characterized by efforts to control group, 406–407
Impairment Scale, learn how a limited normal curve: A bell-shaped,
521 number of personality smooth, mathematically defi
neuropsychological traits can be applied to all ned curve highest at the
mental status examination: people; contrast with center and gradually tapered
A general clinical idiographic approach, on both sides, approaching
evaluation designed to 398 but never actually touching
sample and check for the horizontal axis, 80, 82
area under, 93, 95–96 referenced testing and Dignity Act odd-
psychological tests and, assessment, 111 , 122– even reliability: An
94–96 124, 235–236 estimate
normalized standard score norms: The test performance of split-half reliability of
scale: data of a group of a test, obtained by
Conceptually, the end testtakers, designed as a assigning oddnumbered
product of “stretching” a reference for evaluating, items to one-half of the
skewed distribution into interpreting, or otherwise test and even-numbered
the shape of a normal placing in context items to the other half,
curve, usually through individual test scores; 145, 147
nonlinear transformation, also referred to as Offi ce of Strategic Services
99–100 normative data, 108–109, (OSS),
normalizing a distribution: A 111–112. See also 337, 394, 462
statistical correction norming; norm- Offi cer Qualifying Test, 337
applied to distributions referenced testing and Olley, Rivka, 343
meeting certain criteria assessment On the Origin of Species by
for the purpose of age, 118–119 Means of
approximating a normal developmental, 120 Natural Selection
distribution, thus making fi xed reference
(Darwin), 36 online
the data more readily group scoring
databases, 32, 33 online
comprehensible or systems and, 121–122 surveys, 584–585 online
manipulable, 99 grade, 119–120 testing, 66 optional subtest.
normative sample: Also sampling to develop, See supplemental subtest
referred to as a norm 112–118 for Optometry Admission Test
group, a group of people standardized test, (OAT), 364 ordinal scale: A
presumed to be 117–118 types of, system of
representative of the 118–122 user, 111 measurement in which all
universe of people who things measured can be
may take a particular test OAT. See Optometry
Admission Test Object rank-ordered, where the
and whose performance rank-ordering implies
data on that test may be Sorting Test, 516, 526
objective personality test: nothing about exactly
used as a reference source how much greater one
or context for evaluating Typically a test consisting of
short-answer items wherein ranking is than another
individual test scores, and there is no absolute
111, 117 the assessee’s task is to select
one response from the two or zero point on the scale;
norming: The process of most scales in
deriving or creating more provided and all
scoring is done according to psychology and
norms, 111 education are ordinal,
set procedures involving
norm-referenced cut score. 74–76
See relative little if any judgment on the
part of the scorer, 424–425 Oregon’s Death with Dignity
cut score Act
observer bias, 466–467
norm-referenced testing and O’Connor Tweezer (ODDA), 64–65
assessment: A method Dexterity Test, organicity: An abbreviated
of evaluation and a way 549–550 reference to organic brain
of deriving meaning damage and to one of the
OCQ. See Organizational
from test scores by Commitment varieties of functional
evaluating an individual consequences that attends
Questionnaire
testtaker’s score and such damage, 513–517
ODDA. See Oregon’s Death
comparing it to scores of organizational commitment:
with
a group of testtakers on The strength of an
the same test; contrast individual’s identifi
with criterion- cation with and
involvement in a School Ability Test, 340 parole, readiness for, 496–
particular organization, outlier: (1) An extremely 497 PASAT. See Paced
578 atypical plot point in a Auditory Serial Addition
Organizational Commitment scatterplot; (2) any Task
Questionnaire (OCQ), extremely atypical fi nding PASS model: Information-
578 organizational in research, 132 processing model
credentialing, 22–23 overt behavior: An developed by Luria;
organizational culture: The observable action PASS stands for
totality of socially or the product of an planning, attention,
transmitted behavior patterns observable action, simultaneous, and
characteristic of an including test- or successive,
organization or company, assessment-related 288–289 pattern
including the structure of the responses, 102 analysis: Study of the pattern
organization and the roles of test scores on a Wechsler
within it, the leadership style, Paced Auditory Serial or other test in order to
the prevailing values, norms, Addition Task identify a pattern associated
sanctions, and support (PASAT), 213 panel with a diagnosis (e.g.,
mechanisms as well as the interview: Also referred to neurological defi cit in the
traditions and folklore, as a board interview, an right hemisphere), 525
methods of enculturation, interview conducted with Pavlo, Barbara C., 17
and characteristic ways of one interviewee by more PCAT. See Pharmacy
interacting with people and than one interviewer at a College Admission Test
institutions outside the time, 8 PCL. See Psychopathy
culture (such as customers, parallel forms: Two or more Checklist
suppliers, competition, versions or forms of the PCL-R. See Revised
government agencies, and the same test where, for each Psychopathy Checklist
general public), 578–581 form, the means and Pearson, Karl, 37, 126–127
orientation: A three-part variances of observed test
scores are equal; contrast Pearson r: Also known as the
element of the mental Pearson coeffi cient of
status examination with alternate forms, 144
consisting of orientation – 145 product-moment
to self (if the interviewee parallel processing. See correlation and the
knows who he or she is), simultaneous processing Pearson
place (where the parallel-forms reliability: An correlation coeffi cient, a
interview is taking estimate of the extent to widely used statistic for
place), and time (the date which item sampling and obtaining an index of the
of the interview); other errors have affected relationship between two
interviewees oriented to test scores on two variables when that
person, place, and time versions of the same test relationship is linear and
are said to be when, for each form of when the two correlated
“oriented times 3,” the test, the means and variables are continuous
477 orienting response: variances of observed test (i.e., theoretically can
Indicative of an infant’s scores are equal; contrast take any value),
capacity for with alternate-forms 126–128, 150 peer
responsiveness, the reliability, 144 – 145 appraisal: A method of
action of turning in the PARC v. Commonwealth of obtaining evaluation-related
direction of a stimulus; Pennsylvania, 59 information about an
contrast with alerting Parent Attitude individual by polling that
response, 290 Questionnaire, 347 individual’s friends,
originality, 342 OSS. See Parenting Stress Index classmates, work colleagues,
Offi ce of Strategic (PSI), 505 parents, or other peers,
Services Otis-Lennon evaluation of, 500–501
375–376, 572 penile procedures used to and behavioral styles, and
plethysmograph: An evaluate the integration or related characteristics,
instrument, used in the coordination of sensory 299–300, 378–379, 382,
assessment and treatment of and motor abilities, 530– 422 personality assessment:
male sex offenders, designed 533 The
to measure changes in penis performance assessment: An measurement and
volume as a function of evaluation of evaluation of
sexual arousal, 463 performance tasks psychological traits,
PEP. See Profi ciency according to criteria states, values, interests,
Examination developed by experts attitudes, worldview,
Program from the domain of study acculturation, personal
percentage correct: On a test tapped by those tasks, identity, sense of humor,
with responses that are 373–375 cognitive and behavioral
scored correct or performance task or test: (1) styles, and/or related
incorrect, an expression In general, a work sample individual characteristics,
of the number of items designed to elicit 379. See also behavioral
answered correctly, representative assessment;
multiplied by 100 and knowledge, skills, and Minnesota Multiphasic
divided by the total values from a particular Personality
number of items; domain of study; (2) in Inventory; projective
contrast with percentile, employment settings, an method actuarial
118 instrument or procedure approach to, 467–468
percentile: An expression of Barnum effect in, 506,
the percentage of people 508 biased judgments in,
whose score on a test or 387–388 in career
measure falls below a I-19
counseling, 555–558
particular raw score, or performance task or test: clinical approach to, 467–
a converted score that (continued) that requires 468 context of, 388
refers to a percentage of the assessee to criterion groups in, 404–
testtakers; contrast with demonstrate certain job- 418 cultural issues in,
percentage correct, 118 related skills or abilities 389, 400, 418–422 data
percentile norms: The raw under conditions identical reduction methods in,
data from a test’s or analogous to 402–404 fi gure drawings
standardization sample conditions on the job, 373 in, 444–448 frame of
converted to percentile peripheral nervous system: reference in, 395, 397
form, 118 All of the nerve cells that general principles of, 484
percept: A perception of an convey neural messages to with inkblots, 427–432
image (typically used with and from the body except ipsative scoring of, 253–
reference to the Rorschach those nerve cells of the brain 254 issues in
Inkblot Test), 428 and spinal cord; contrast with development and use of,
perceptual test: A general the central nervous system, 398–400 item formats
reference to any of many 512 Personal Data Sheet, 40– in, 393–396 life
instruments and procedures 41, 401, 408 personality: An outcomes infl uenced
used to evaluate varied individual’s unique by, 465 location of, 391
aspects of sensory constellation of logic and reason in, 401
functioning, including psychological traits and objective, 424–425
aspects of sight, hearing, states, including aspects of origin of, 36 pictures in,
smell, touch, taste, and values, interests, attitudes, 432–440 primary
balance, 530–533 worldview, acculturation, content area sampled in,
perceptual-motor test: A sense of personal identity,
389–390 procedures in,
general reference to any sense of humor, cognitive 393–395 purpose of, 383–
of many instruments and 385 referents in, 385–389
response styles in, 390–391 phallometric data, 463 organized into subtests
sample questions from, 383 Pharmacy College by category of item;
scope and theory of, 392– Admission Test contrast with age scale,
393 scoring and (PCAT), 364 314
interpretation of, 3 97–398 Piaget, Jean, 281–283 poll: A type of survey used
sounds in, 443–444 in PIC. See Personality to record votes, usually
standard battery, 481–482 Inventory for containing questions
Children picture that can be answered
absurdity item: A type of with a “yes-no” or “for-
test item that presents the against” response,
I-20 typically used to gauge
testtaker with the task of
testtakers of, 385–391 identifying what is wrong or opinion about issues,
theory behind, 401–402 silly about a stimulus image, 584
validity scales in, 399– 528–530 polygraph: The instrument
400, 408, 417 words in, popularly known as a lie
pictures, as projective
440–443 detector, 463–464
stimuli early uses
Personality Inventory for of, 433 examples polytomous test item: A test
Children of, 432, 439–440 item or question with three or
(PIC), 387 personality TAT, 433–439 more alternative responses,
profi le: A description, graph, where only one alternative is
Piers-Harris Self-Concept
or table representing the Scale, scored correct or scored as
extent to which a person has being consistent with a
385–386 pilot work:
demonstrated a particular targeted trait or other
Also referred to as pilot
pattern of traits and states, construct, 159 Porteus,
study and pilot research, the
382 Stanley D., 527 portfolio: A
preliminary research
Personality Projection in surrounding the creation of a work sample; referred to as
the Drawing of the prototype test; a general portfolio assessment when
Human Figure objective of pilot work is to used as a tool in an
(Machover), determine how best to evaluative or diagnostic
445–446 personality measure, gauge, assess, or process, 9–10, 373–375, 563
states, 102, 382–383 evaluate the targeted positive skew, 82, 90, 91
personality trait: Any construct(s), 236–237 PL 94- positron emission
distinguishable, relatively 142. See Public Law 94-142 tomography scan.
enduring way in which one placement: A disposition, See PET scan
individual varies from transfer, or assignment to a power test: A test,
another, 101–104, 379–381, group or category that may usually of
403, be made on the basis of one achievement or ability,
556–557 personality criterion, 560–561 with (1) either no time
type: A constellation of platykurtic: A description of limit or such a long time
traits and states that is the kurtosis of a limit that all testtakers
similar in pattern to one distribution that is can attempt all items and
identifi ed category of relatively fl at in its (2) some items so diffi
personality within a center, 92 cult that no testtaker can
taxonomy of personalities, plethysmograph: An obtain a perfect score;
381–382, 557–558 instrument that records contrast with speed test,
PET (positron emission changes in the volume of 154 – 155
tomography) scan: A tool a part of the body arising predeterminism: The
of nuclear medicine from variations in blood doctrine that one’s
particularly useful in supply, 463 abilities are
diagnosing biochemical PMAs. See primary mental predetermined by
lesions in the brain, 5 42 abilities point scale: A test genetic inheritance and
with items that no amount of
learning or other changes, 196 primary (PEP), 354, 356 profi le:
intervention can mental abilities (PMAs), A narrative description,
enhance what is 310 Princip, Gavrilo, 178– graph, table, or other
genetically coded to 180 privacy right: The representation of the extent
unfold, freedom of people to choose to which a person has
293–294 the time, circumstances, and demonstrated certain targeted
predictive validity: A extent to which they wish to characteristics as a result of
form of share or withhold from the administration or
criterion-related validity others personal beliefs, application of tools of
that is an index of the opinions, and behavior; assessment; also (a verb) to
degree to which a test contrast with profi le, 382
score predicts some confi dentiality, 68 profi le analysis: The
criterion measure, 180, privileged information: Data interpretation of
182–183, 191–192 protected by law from patterns of scores on a
preformationism: The disclosure in a legal test or test battery,
doctrine that all living proceeding; typically, frequently used to
organisms are preformed exceptions to privilege generate diagnostic
at birth and that are also noted in law; hypotheses from
intelligence, much like contrast with confi intelligence test data,
other preformed dential information, 68 382n1
“structures,” cannot be probation, readiness for, profi ler: An occupation
improved upon by 496–497 procedural associated with law
environmental memory: Memory for how to enforcement; one who
intervention, do certain things or perform creates psychological
292–293 premorbid certain functions; contrast profi les of crime
functioning: One’s ability with declarative memory, suspects to help law
level, personality, or other 534 – 535 enforcement personnel
behavioral attributes prior process score: A score on a capture the profi led
to the onset of illness or test designed to help the suspect, 382n1
disorder, and/ or prior to an test user understand the profi ling: Referred to by the
injury-producing accident, way that the testtaker FBI as “criminal
470 processes information, investigative analysis,” a
preschool assessment 326 crime-solving process
ADHD and, 346, 348 processing strength, 369 that
checklists for, 346, product-moment coeffi cient draws upon
348–349 laws of correlation. See Pearson r psychological and
regarding, 345 productivity gain: A net criminological expertise
psychological tests for, increase in work output, applied to the study of
349–350 rating scales which in utility analyses crime-scene evidence,
for, 346–349 may be estimated through 498–499 prognostic test:
specialized instruments the use of a particular test A tool of assessment used to
for, 350 press: or other evaluative predict; sometimes
According to procedure, synonymous with aptitude
personality theorist 223–224 productivity: test, 358
Henry Murray, Output or value yielded program norms. See user
determinants of relative to work effort, 571– norms progressive condition,
behavior arising from 574 521 Project Head Start, 327
within the professional or occupational projective hypothesis: The
environment; contrast entrance examinations, thesis that an individual
with the 363–364 supplies structure to
Murrayan concept of Profi ciency Examination unstructured stimuli in a
need, 435 pretest-posttest Program manner consistent with the
individual’s own unique Sigmund Freud, 49, 64 482–488 custody
pattern of conscious and psychoeducational evaluation, 498, 500–
unconscious needs, fears, assessment: Psychological 502 dynamic, 4, 363–
desires, impulses, confl icts, evaluation in a school or 366 fairness in, 106
and ways of perceiving and other setting, usually forensic, 490–498
responding, 426 conducted to diagnose, general principles of,
projective method: A remedy, or measure 484–485 intervention
technique of personality academic or social progress and, 4 interviews in, 7–
assessment in which or to otherwise enrich a 9 medical tools in, 14
some judgment of the student’s education, 287 norm-referenced v.
assessee’s personality is psychoeducational test criterion-
made on the basis of his battery: A packaged kit referenced, 122–124
or her performance on a containing tests that parties in, 15–20 by Pavlo,
task that involves measure educational 17 of people with
supplying structure to achievement and abilities disabilities, 25, 28–30
relatively unstructured or related to academic portfolio in, 9–10 process
incomplete stimuli, 41, success, 343, 368 for of, 2–4 psychoeducational,
426–427. educational assessment, 287 psychophysiological,
See also inkblots 368–373 K-ABC and, 462–464 quality of life in,
assumptions of, 449– 368–371 22 reference sources for,
451 in custody WJ-III, 286, 371–373 30–33 role-play tests in,
evaluation, 501 fi gure psychological assessment: 11–12 roots of, 1 settings
drawings, 444–448, The gathering and integrating of, 20–24 social
504 Hand Test, 397, of psychological data for facilitation in, 16 testing
438 pictures as, 432– psychological evaluation, v., 2–3 tests in, 5–7
440 pros and cons of, through the use of tests, therapeutic, 4 third-party
448–449 psychometric interviews, case studies, observer in, 18 types of, 4
considerations in, behavioral observation, and video in, 14
451–452 specially designed psychological autopsy: A
Rosenzweig Picture- apparatuses and reconstruction of a
Frustration measurement procedures; deceased individual’s
Study, 438–440 contrast with psychological psychological profi le on
situational variables in, 451 testing, 1–4. See also the basis of archival
sounds as, 443–444 words as, clinical/counseling records, artifacts, and
440–443 Proposition 209, assessment; educational interviews with the
571 protocol: (1) The form or assessment; assessee while living or
sheet on which testtakers’ neuropsychological with people who knew
responses are entered; (2) a assessment; personality the deceased, 19
method or procedure for assessment; preschool psychological report: An
evaluation or scoring, 24, assessment archival document
24n2 assessor’s role in, 3–4, 29 describing fi ndings as a
Proverbs Test, 525 assumptions about, 101– result of psychological
PSI. See Parenting 107 behavioral testing or assessment, 505
Stress Index observation in, 10–11 in
psychasthenia, 407n5 biopsychosocial
psychiatric patients, assessment, 473 CAPA,
214 psychoanalysis: 13–14, 63, 66, 510 case I-21
A theory of history data in, 10 psychological report:
personality and collaborative, 4 (continued)
psychological treatment conducting of, 24–30 Barnum effect in, 506,
originally developed by culturally informed, 137– 508 clinical v.
138, 389, mechanical prediction in,
508–510 of antiquated term selection of people to be part
clinical/counseling psychometry ), 6 of a sample because they are
assessment, psychometrist: A thought to be representative
505–510 professional in testing of the population being
elements of, and assessment who studied, 112, 115
507–508 typically holds a master’s
psychological test: A degree in psychology or Q-sort technique: An
measuring device or education and is qualifi assessment technique in
procedure designed to ed to administer specifi c which the task is to sort a
measure psychology- tests; contrast with group of statements,
related variables, 5 psychometrician, 6 usually in perceived rank
choice of, 109 psychopath: A diagnosis that order ranging from “most
normal curve describes individuals with descriptive” to “least
and, 94–96 few inhibitions who may descriptive”; the
psychological testing: The pursue pleasure or money statements, traditionally
measuring of psychology- with callous disregard for the presented on index cards,
related variables by welfare of others, 497 may be sorted in ways
means of devices or Psychopathy Checklist that refl ect various
procedures designed to (PCL), 497 perceptions, such as how
obtain samples of psychophysiological respondents see
assessment methods: themselves or would like
behavior, 1–4. See also
intelligence testing Techniques for monitoring to see themselves, 395
assessment v., 2–3 physiological changes known qualitative item analysis: A
assumptions about, 101– to be infl uenced by general term for various
107 in psychological factors, such nonstatistical procedures
clinical/counseling as heart rate and blood designed to explore how
assessment, pressure, 462–464 individual test items
PsycINFO: An online work, both compared to
480–482 fairness
electronic database, other items in the test and
in, 106 norm-
maintained by the in the context of the
referenced v.
American whole test; in contrast to
criterion-
Psychological statistically based
referenced, 122–124
Association and leased procedures, qualitative
roots of, 1 methods involve
psychologist-client to institutional users,
designed to help exploration of the issues
relationship, 68–69 by verbal means such as
psychometrician: A individuals locate
relevant documents interviews and group
professional in testing and discussions conducted
assessment who typically from psychology,
education, nursing, with testtakers and other
holds a doctoral degree in relevant parties, 265–267
psychology or education and social work, law,
medicine, and other qualitative methods, 265
specializes in areas such as quality assurance, 271–273
individual differences, disciplines, 32
quality of life: in
quantitative psychology, or psychological assessment, an
theory of assessment; evaluation of variables such
contrast with psychometrist, I-22
Public Law (PL) 94–142, as perceived stress,
6 loneliness, sources of
psychometrics: The science 345 public opinion, legal
considerations and, 54–56 satisfaction, personal values,
of quality of living conditions,
psychological public policy, cultural issues
and, 53 Purdue Pegboard and quality of friendships
measurement and other social support, 22
(synonymous with the Test, 530 purposive
sampling: The arbitrary quantitative methods:
Techniques of data
generation and analysis judgment that places a can be performed
that rely primarily on person or attribute along a meaningfully because a
mathematical or continuum identifi ed by a true or absolute zero
statistical rather than scale of numerical or word point exists; few scales in
verbal procedures, 265 descriptors called a rating psychology or education
quartile: One of three scale, 202 are ratio scales, 76–77
dividing points between rating error: A judgment that raw score: A straightforward,
the four quarters of a results from the unmodifi ed accounting
distribution, each intentional or of performance, usually
typically labeled unintentional misuse of a numerical and typically
Q1, Q2, or Q3, 88 quota rating scale; two types of used for evaluation or
system: A selection rating error are leniency diagnosis, 78
procedure whereby a fi xed error (or generosity RCRAS. See Rogers
number or percentage of error ) and severity Criminal
applicants with certain error, 202 – 203 Responsibility
characteristics or from rating scale: A system of Assessment Scale
certain backgrounds are ordered numerical or reacculturation, 490
selected regardless of other verbal descriptors on reactivity: Changes in an
factors such as documented which judgments about assessee’s behavior, thinking,
ability, 58–59 the presence/absence or or performance that arise in
magnitude of a particular response to being observed,
race norming: The trait, attitude, emotion, or assessed, or evaluated,
controversial practice of other variable are 460, 467 readiness test:
norming on the basis of indicated by raters, A tool of assessment
race or ethnic judges, examiners, or designed to evaluate whether
background, 111, (when the rating scale refl an individual has the
551, 555 ects self-report) the requisites to begin a program
racism, 294 range: A assessee, 202, 239 or perform a task; sometimes
descriptive statistic of in behavioral observation, synonymous with
variability derived by 457–559 for preschool aptitude test, 359
calculating the difference assessment, 346–349 reading rate, 195
between the highest and ratio IQ: An index of reading tests, 366–367,
lowest scores in a intelligence derived from 368 Reading-Free
distribution, 87 the ratio of the testtaker’s Vocational Interest
rank-difference correlation mental age (as calculated Inventory (R-FVII), 549
coeffi cient. from a test) divided by reasonable boundaries, 172
See Spearman’s rho his or her chronological rectangular distribution, 82
rank-order correlation coeffi age and multiplied by 100 Reeve, Bryce B., 160, 165–
cient. See to eliminate decimals, 166 reference volumes, 31,
Spearman’s rho 313 33 refl ex: Involuntary motor
ranking: The ordinal ratio scale: A system of response to a
ordering of persons, scores, measurement in which all stimulus, 523
or variables into relative things measured can be regression: The analysis of
positions or degrees of rank-ordered, the rank relationships among
value, 202 Raphael, Alan, ordering does imply variables to understand
481 rapport: A working something about exactly how one variable may
relationship between how much greater one predict another, 133
examiner and examinee in ranking is than another, correlation and, 133–
testing or assessment, 24 equal intervals exist 135 multiple, 135
Rasch, Georg, 160 RAT. See between each number on
Remote Associates Test regression coeffi cient: In the
the scale, and all formula Y a bX,
rating: A numerical or verbal mathematical operations the letter a (symbolizing
the ordinate intercept) is a 153, 156 IRT and, 158– résumé, 561 retirement, 559–
regression coeffi cient 160 odd-even, 145, 147 560 Retirement Satisfaction
and so is the letter b parallel-forms, 144–145 Inventory, 560 return on
(which is equal to the split-half, 145–148, 154 investment: A ratio of the
slope of the line); in standard error of the economic and/or
practice, the actual values difference and, noneconomic benefi ts
of a and b are 168–170 standard error derived from expenditures to
determined by simple of measurement and, initiate or improve a
algebraic calculation, 133 160, 164, 166–168 and particular testing program,
regression line: The result of test nature, 152–160 test- training program, or
simple regression retest, 143–144, 153–154, intervention as compared to
analysis; the graphic “line 431 utility infl uenced by, all of the costs of the
of best fi t” that comes 209–210 Remote Associates initiative or improvements,
closest to the greatest Test (RAT), 342 reliability 223 Revised NEO
number of points on the coeffi cient: General term for Personality Inventory
scatterplot of the two an index of reliability or the (NEO PI-R), 399, 403–
variables, ratio of true score variance 405
133–134 on a test to the total variance, Revised Psychopathy
Reik, Theodor, 467 139, 151–160 Checklist
Reitan, Ralph M., 538 response style: A tendency (PCL-R), 497
Reitan-Indiana Aphasia to respond to a test item R-FVII. See Reading-Free
Screening Test or interview question in Vocational Interest
(AST), 534 relative cut some characteristic Inventory Richardson, M.
score: Also referred to as a manner regardless of W., 148 risk assessment,
norm-referenced cut score, a content; for example, an of child abuse and neglect,
reference point in a acquiescent response 505
distribution of test scores style (a tendency to RNEE. See Entrance
used to divide a set of data agree) and a socially Examination for Schools
into two classifi cations desirable response style of Nursing
based on norm-related (a tendency to present Rogers, Carl, 395
considerations rather than on oneself in a favorable or Rogers Criminal
the relationship of test scores socially desirable way), Responsibility
to a criterion, 225–226 390–391 Assessment Scale
reliability: The extent to restriction of range: Also (RCRAS), 496 Rokeach
which measurements are referred to as Value Survey, 75 role
consistent or repeatable; restriction of variance, play: Acting an
also, the extent to which a improvised or partially
measurements differ from phenomenon associated improvised part in a
occasion to occasion as a with reliability estimates simulated situation, 11,
function of measurement wherein the variance of 462
error, 107–108, either variable in a role-play test: An assessment
109–110, 331 correlational analysis is tool wherein assessees are
alternate-forms, 144– restricted by the sampling instructed to act as if they
145, 153–154 in procedure used and so were placed in a
classrooms, 239 error the resulting correlation particular situation, 11–
and, 139–143, 152–153 coeffi cient tends to be 12, 489
estimates of, 143–151 lower; contrast with infl Rorschach, Hermann, 41,
generalizability theory ation of range, 427
and, 157–158 internal 132 – 133 , 153–154, Rorschach inkblots, 397
consistency estimate of, 183 restriction of variance. administration, scoring, and
145–150, 153, 256–257 See restriction interpretation of, 428–
inter-scorer, 150–151, of range 430
assumptions of, SB5. See Stanford-Binet test development that
450 Intelligence entails a graphic mapping
development of, Scale scale: (1) A system of a testtaker’s responses,
427 inkblots in, of ordered numerical or 242
428–429 MMPI verbal descriptors, usually scatter diagram. See
v., 432 systems occurring at fi xed intervals, bivariate
of, 430 testing used as a reference standard distribution
the limits in, 429 in measurement; (2) a set of scattergram. See bivariate
value of, 481 numbers or other symbols distribution scatterplot: Also
Rosenzweig Picture- whose properties model referred to as a scatter
Frustration Study, empirical properties of the diagram, a graphic
438–440 objects or traits to which description of correlation
Rotter Incomplete Sentences numbers or other symbols are achieved by graphing the
Blank, assigned, 72, 241–242 coordinate points for the two
442–443 routing test: absolute zero points variables, 129–133
A subtest used to direct in, 75–77 Schedule for Affective
or route the testtaker to a continuous, 72–73 Disorders and
suitable level of items, discrete, 72 interval, Schizophrenia (SADS),
316 75–76 Likert, 240– 474 schema: In Piagetian
Rule 702, 60 241 nominal, 74, 76 theory, an action or mental
Russell, J. T., ordinal, 74–76 structure that, when applied
185 to the world, leads to
knowing or understanding,
s factor: In Spearman’s two- I-23 281
factor theory of scale: (continued) rating, schemata: The plural of
intelligence, a specifi c 202, 239, schema, as in “Infants are
component of g, such as 346–349, 457– born with several simple
a specifi c ability; 559 ratio, 76–77 schemata, including
contrast with g factor summative, 240 sucking and grasping,”
and group factors, 283 – scaling: (1) In test 281
284 construction, the process Scholastic Aptitude Test
SADS. See Schedule for of setting rules for (SAT), 98, 122,
Affective assigning numbers in 360–361
Disorders and measurement; (2) the school ability tests, 20, 340–
Schizophrenia Salomone, process by which a 341. See also
Kathleen, 513 sample: A measuring device is educational assessment;
group of people presumed designed and calibrated preschool assessment
to be representative of the and the way numbers (or School and College Ability
total population or universe other indices that are Test, 567
of people being studied or scale values) are SCID-D-R. See Structured
tested, 112 assigned to different Clinical Interview for
sample approach, 453 amounts of the trait, Dissociative
sampling: A general attribute, or
Disorders-Revised
reference to the characteristic measured;
SCII. See Strong-Campbell
process of developing a (3) assigning numbers in
Interest
sample, 112 accordance with
empirical Inventory score: A code
item, 140 norms or summary statement—
developed from, 112– properties of objects or
usually but not necessarily
118 SAT. See Scholastic traits, 237,
numerical—that refl ects an
Aptitude Test 239–243 scalogram
evaluation of the
SATB. See Special Aptitude analysis: an item-analysis
performance on a test, task,
Test Battery procedure and approach to
interview, or other sample of
behavior, 5–6. See also screening: A relatively true-false, multiple-choice,
standard score superfi cial process of and matching items) as
generalizability of, evaluation based on opposed to constructing
110 limitations of, certain minimal or creating one; contrast
343 meaning standards, criteria, or with constructed-
attached to, 30 requirements; contrast response format, 245
scoring: The process of with selection, classifi selection: A process
assigning evaluative cation, and placement, whereby each person
codes or statements to 560 – 561 evaluated for a position
performance on tests, screening tool: (1) An is either accepted or
tasks, interviews, or instrument or procedure rejected; contrast with
other behavior samples, used to identify a screening, classifi
6 particular trait or cation, and placement,
anchor protocol for, 272– constellation of traits at a 560 – 561
273 gross or imprecise level, selection ratio: A numerical
as opposed to a test of value that
greater precision used for refl ects the relationship
I-24 more defi nitive diagnosis between the number of
class, 253 cumulative, or evaluation; (2) in people to be hired and
104 error variance from, preschool assessment, an the number of people
141–142 extended report instrument or procedure available to be hired,
of, 13 fi xed reference used as a fi rst step in 185, 210,
group, 121–122 inter- identifying a child who is 221–222 self-concept:
scorer reliability and, “at risk” or not One’s attitudes, beliefs,
150–151 ipsative, 253– functioning within opinions, and related
254 of items, in test normal limits; (3) in thoughts about oneself,
development, employment settings, an 385–386
253–254 of personality instrument or procedure self-concept differentiation:
assessments, 397–398 of used as a gross measure The degree to which an
Rorschach test, 428–430 to determine who meets individual has different
simple report of, 13 of minimum requirements self-concepts in different
Stanford-Binet set by the employer, 337 roles, 386
Intelligence Scale, SD scales. See social self-concept measure: An
318–319 scoring drift: desirability scales instrument designed to
A discrepancy between the SDMT. See Stanford yield information about
scoring in an anchor Diagnostic Mathematics how an individual sees
protocol and the scoring of Test him- or herself with
another protocol, 273 SDRT. See Stanford regard to selected
scoring report: A formal or Diagnostic Reading Test psychological variables,
offi cial computer- SDS. See Self-Directed the data from which are
generated account of test Search usually interpreted in the
performance, usually Seashore Bennett context of how others
represented numerically; Stenographic Profi ciency may see themselves on
the two varieties are the Test, 564 Seashore Measures the same or similar
simple scoring report of Musical Talent, 363 variables, 385
(containing only a report second-order factors, 333 Self-Directed Search (SDS),
of the scores) and the secondary-school aptitude 382, 402,
extended scoring report tests, 360–362 Secret 548–549 self-effi cacy:
(containing item Service, 493–494 selected- Confi dence in one’s own
statistics); contrast with response format: A form of ability to accomplish a task,
interpretive report and test item requiring testtakers 473
integrative report, 13 to select a response (e.g.,
Self-Help Agency are examined for independent variable and
Satisfaction Scale, fairness to all one dependent variable,
582 self- prospective testtakers 133
monitoring: The act and for the presence of simple scoring report: A type
of offensive language, of
systematically observing stereotypes, or scoring report that
and recording aspects of situations, 267 provides only a listing of
one’s own behavior sensory defi cits, 514–515, scores, 13
and/or events related to 518 sentence completion simultaneous learners, 370
that behavior, 460 stem: All the words that simultaneous processing:
self-report: The process make up the part of a Also called parallel
wherein an assessee sentence completion item, processing; based on Luria’s
supplies personal not including the blank writings, a type of
information in forms space to be completed by information processing
such as responding to the testtaker, 442 sentence whereby information is
questions, keeping a completion tests, 395, 397, integrated and synthesized all
diary, or reporting on 442–443, 502, 567 at once and as a whole;
selfmonitored thoughts sequential learners, 370 contrast with successive
and/or behaviors, 41, sequential processing. See processing, 288
385 successive single photon emission
objectivity and, 425 processing computed tomography.
problems with, 399, 7 Minute Screen, 522 See SPECT
425 Severe Impairment Battery SIRS. See Structured
semantic differential (SIB), Interview of Reported
technique: An item 540–541 severity error: Symptoms Situational
format characterized by Less than accurate rating or Competency Test, 489
bipolar adjectives error in evaluation due to the situational performance
separated by a seven- rater’s tendency to be overly measure: A procedure that
point rating scale on critical; contrast with typically involves the
which respondents select generosity error, 202 , 387 performance of a task by the
one point shifting cultural lenses, assessee under actual or
to indicate their response, 483, 486 Shoemaker, simulated conditions while
396, Adam, 175 short form: An allowing for observation and
585–586 semantic abbreviated version of a evaluation by an assessor,
memory: Memory for facts; test that has typically been 461–462
contrast with episodic reduced in number of Sixteen Personality Factor
memory, items from the original, (16PF)
usually to reduce the time Questionnaire, 403
535 – 536
needed for test 16PF Questionnaire. See
semi-interquartile range: A administration, scoring, Sixteen
measure of and/or interpretation, 330– Personality Factor
variability equal to the 331 Questionnaire skewness: An
interquartile range Short Portable Mental Status indication of the nature and
divided by 2, 88 Questionnaire, 521 extent to which symmetry is
semi-structured short-answer, 247, 249 absent in a distribution; a
techniques, 440 Sensation- SIB. See Severe distribution is said to be
Seeking Scale (SSS), 103 Impairment Battery sign skewed positively when
sensitivity review: A study approach, 453 simple relatively few scores fall at
of test items, usually frequency distribution, 78 the positive end and skewed
during test development, simple regression: The negatively when relatively
in which items few scores fall at the negative
analysis of the
relationship between one end, 91–92 Skinner, B. F.,
443–444 slope bias: A Spearman, Charles, 128–129, achievement or ability,
reference to the slope of a 283–284, 297 with a time limit; speed
regression line being Spearman-Brown formula: tests usually contain
different between groups, An items of uniform diffi
this term refers to a test or equation used to culty level,
measurement procedure estimate internal 154–155, 264–265
systematically yielding consistency reliability Spielberger, Charles D., 383
different validity coeffi cients from a correlation of split-half reliability: An
for members of different two halves of a test that estimate of the internal
groups; contrast with has been lengthened or consistency of a test obtained
intercept bias, 200 by correlating two pairs of
shortened; inappropriate
social desirability (SD) scores obtained from
for use with
scales, 399 social facilitation: heterogeneous tests or equivalent halves of a single
The process by which the test administered once, 145
speed tests, 146–148
presence of one or more Spearman-Brown formula
Spearman’s rho: Also
people can infl uence the for,
referred to as the rank-
performance of other 146–148
order correlation coeffi
persons; in the context of of speed
cient and the
psychological assessment, it tests, 154
rank-difference
refers more specifi cally to Sputnik, 55
correlation coeffi cient,
the infl uence of third parties
on the performance of the this index of correlation SSHA. See Survey of Study
may be the statistic of Habits and Attitudes
assessee, 16 Social Situation
choice when the sample SSS. See Sensation-Seeking
Picture Test, 432 social
size is small and both sets Scale STAI. See State-Trait
support: Expressions of
of measurements are Anxiety Inventory standard
understanding, acceptance,
ordinal, 128–129 Special battery: The administration
empathy, love, advice,
Aptitude Test Battery of a group of at least three
guidance, care, concern, or
(SATB), different types of tests for the
trust from friends, family,
community caregivers, or 550 specifi c learning purpose of evaluating
others in one’s social disability (SLD): A different spheres of
disorder in one or more of functioning: usually an
environment, 473
the basic psychological intelligence test, a
sociogram: A graphic
processes involved in personality test, and a
representation of peer
understanding or using neuropsychological test,
appraisal data or other
language, spoken or 481–482 standard
interpersonal information,
written, that may manifest deviation: A measure of
376
itself in the imperfect variability equal to the square
soft sign: In
ability to listen, think, root of the averaged squared
neuropsychological
speak, read, write, spell, or deviations about the mean; a
assessment, an perform mathematical measure of variability equal
indication that calculations, 351 to the square root of the
neurological defi cit may
SPECT (single photon variance, 89–91
be present; for example,
emission computed standard error of the
a signifi cant
tomography): A difference: A statistic
discrepancy between
Verbal and Performance technology that records designed to aid in
the course of a determining how large
subtests on a
radioactive tracer fl uid a difference between
Wechsler test, 517 (iodine) and produces two scores should be
sounds, as projective
exceptionally clear before it is considered
stimuli, 443–444 source photographs of organs statistically signifi cant,
traits, 403 Southern and tissues, 542 168–170
California Sensory
Integration Tests, 540 speed test: A test, usually of
standard error of the of comparison or ); (2) in psychoanalytic
estimate: In regression, judgment, 114 theory, an inferred
an estimate of the standardized test: A test or
magnitude of error; the measure that has
lower the degree of undergone standardization,
correlation, the higher the I-26
114, 117–118 Standards
standard error of the for Educational and psychodynamic
estimate, disposition designed to
Psychological Testing, 16, convey the dynamic
115, 135 standard error 54, 69,
of measurement: In true quality of id, ego, and
113, 123n6 superego in perpetual
score theory, a statistic
designed to estimate the Stanford Achievement Test confl ict, 102, 382–383
series, 267 state anxiety, 383 State-
extent to
Stanford Diagnostic Trait Anxiety Inventory
Mathematics Test (STAI),
I-25 (SDMT), 368 383 static
standard error of Stanford Diagnostic Reading characteristic: A trait, state,
measurement: (continued) Test (SDRT), 368 or ability presumed to be
which an observed score Stanford-Binet Intelligence relatively unchanging over
deviates from a true Scale administration of, time; contrast with
score; also called the 316–318 categories of, 319 dynamic characteristic, 153
standard error of a score, CHC model and, 311, 314– statistics
164 315 cultural considerations, consumers and,
reliability and, 160, 164, 43, 69 development of, 73 data
166–168 311–314 features of, 312– described in, 77–
Stanford-Binet Intelligence 313 fi fth edition, 314–319 92
Scale and, 168 limitations of, 312–313 fi t, 335
standard score: A raw score psychometric soundness of, frequency distributions in,
that has been converted 315–316 scoring and 78–80, 82–83 general
from one scale into interpretation of, principles of, 484 importance
another, where the latter 318–319 short form of, of, 71 kurtosis in, 92
scale (1) has some 330 standard errors of measurement scales in, 72–
arbitrarily set mean and measurement of, 77 measures of central
standard deviation and (2) 168 tendency in, 80–87 measures
is more widely used and standardization of, of variability in, 87–91
readily interpretable; 314–315 normal curve in, 80, 82, 93–
examples of standard Wechsler intelligence tests 96 skewness in, 91–92
scores are z scores and T v., 315 , standard scores in, 96–100,
scores, 96 327–328 stanine: A 115 Sternberg, Robert, 289,
normalized, 99– standard score derived 308 stratifi ed sampling: The
100 stanine, 98– from a scale with a mean process of developing a
99 T scores, 97 z of 5 and a standard sample based on specifi c
scores, 96–97, deviation of subgroups of a population,
100, 115 approximately 2, 98–99, 112 stratifi ed-random
237 sampling: The process of
standardization. See test
state: (1) As in personality developing a sample based
standardization on specifi c subgroups of a
standardize: The verb “to state, the transitory
exhibition of a trait, population in which every
standardize” refers to indicative of a relatively member has the same chance
making or transforming temporary predisposition of being included in the
something into something to behave in a particular sample, 112 Strauss, Alfred,
that can serve as a basis way (contrast with trait 515 streetwiseness, 301, 307
stress interview: An
interview purposely designed summative scale: An index standard deviations below
to pressure or stress the derived from the the mean; a normal curve
interviewee in order to gauge summing of selected has two tails, 93
reaction to that stress, 474 scores on a test or subtest, Tarasoff v. Regents of the
Stresseraser, 27 240 University of California,
Strong, Edward K., Jr., 546 supplemental subtest: Also 68 – 69 , 491
Strong Interest Inventory, referred to as an optional TAT. See Thematic
546–548 subtest, one of a test’s Apperception Test
Strong Vocational Interest subtests that may be used tautophone, 443 Taylor, H.
Blank either for purposes of C., 185
(SVIB), 269, 546 providing additional Taylor-Russell tables:
Strong-Campbell Interest information or in place of Statistical tables once
Inventory a core subtest if, for any extensively used to
(SCII), 546 reason, the use of a score provide test users with an
Structured Clinical Interview on a core subtest would estimate of the extent to
for be questionable; contrast which inclusion of a
Dissociative Disorders- with core subtest, 322 particular test in the
Revised surface traits, 403 survey: In selection system would
(SCID-D-R), 474 consumer psychology, a fi improve selection
structured interview: xed list of questions decisions, 185, 187–188,
Questions posed from a administered to a selected 224
guide with little if any sample of persons, typically teaching item: A test item
leeway to deviate from the to learn about consumers’ designed to illustrate
guide, 393 attitudes, beliefs, opinions, the task required and
Structured Interview of and/or behavior regarding assure the examiner
Reported Symptoms targeted products, services, that the examinee
(SIRS), 474 or advertising, understands what is
Study Attitudes and Methods 584–586 required for success on
Survey, Survey of Study Habits and the task, 316
377, 582 study habits, Attitudes (SSHA), 377 team, 573 Technical
assessment of, 376–377 SVIB. See Strong
Recommendations
Study Habits Checklist, Vocational Interest
Blank syndrome: A for
376 subgroup norms: Achievement Tests
Norms for any set of co-occurring
emotional and behavioral (NEA), 62
defi ned group within a
larger group, 121 problems, 346 Technical Recommendations
substance abuse, for
T score: Named for Psychological Tests and
clinical/counseling
Thorndike, a standard
assessment for, 488–490 Diagnostic
score calculated using a
successive processing: Also Tests (APA), 61
scale with a mean set at
referred to as sequential telephone surveys, 585
50 and a standard
processing; based on teleprocessing: Computerized
deviation set at 10; used
Luria’s writings, a type of by developers of the scoring, interpretation, or
information processing other conversion of raw test
MMPI, 97
whereby information is data sent over telephone lines
tactile memory tests, 537
processed in a sequential, by modem from a test site to
tail: The area on the
bit-by-bit fashion and a central location for
normal curve between 2 computer processing;
arranged and rearranged and 3 standard deviations
until it is logical; contrast contrast with central
above the mean, and the
with simultaneous processing and local
area on the normal curve
processing, 288 processing, 13
between –2 and –3
temperament: With reference test blueprint: A detailed 147 , 153 test
to personality plan of the content, homogeneity: The extent to
assessments of infants, organization, and which individual test items
the distinguishing manner quantity of the items measure a single construct;
of the child’s observable that a test will contain, contrast with test
actions and reactions, 176–177 heterogeneity, 147 , 153,
300–301 test composite: A test score 194–195
tender years doctrine, 498, or index test manual: An archival
500 Terman, Lewis M., 294, derived from the document in any media
296–297, 297n2, combination and/or (booklet, book, electronic
311, 313 terminal values: mathematical form, etc.) devoted to a
Guiding principles and a transformation of one or detailed description of a
mode of behavior that are an more test scores, 314 test and usually available
endpoint objective; for test developers, 15– from the test’s publisher,
example, “a comfortable life” 16, 100 of that ideally provides all
and “an exciting life”; intelligence tests, of the key information
contrast with instrumental 310 prospective test users
values, 419 standardization by, need to know in order to
”termites”: Humorous 114 strengths and make an informed
reference to gifted weaknesses decision about whether
children who participated balanced the test is appropriate for
in Lewis M. Terman’s by, 268 use with a particular
study of intelligence validity and, 184 of testtaker for a particular
initiated in 1916, 297n2 Wechsler intelligence purpose, 31, 33
terrorism, 391–392 test: A tests, 331 test revision, 267–275 test
measuring device or test development standardization: A process of
procedure, from blueprint, 176– test development wherein the
5–7. See also specifi 177 conceptualization test is administered to a
c tests catalogs, 30–31, in, 233–237 control representative sample of
33 environment of, 24, group in, 407 with testtakers under clearly
28, 29–30 ”good,” 107– empirical criterion specifi ed conditions and the
110 manuals, 31, 33 keying, data are scored and
strengths and 404–406 error and, 140 interpreted; the results
weaknesses of, 105 IRT in, 260, 273–275 item establish a context for future
test battery: A selection of analysis in, 233, 255–267 test administrations with
tests and assessment item development issues in, other testtakers, 3 7–38, 112,
procedures typically 235–236 items scored in, 113–115,
composed of tests 253–254 items written in, 117–118, 314–315, 324,
designed to measure 244–253 of personality tests, 330, 407 test user, 16–17,
different variables but 398–400 preliminary 24–25, 71. See also
having a common questions in, 234–235 inter-scorer reliability
objective; for example, an process of, 233–234 revision qualifi cations of, 62–
intelligence test, a in, 267–275 scaling in, 237, 63 validity and, 184
personality test, and a 239–243 tryout in, 254–255 test utility. See utility
neuropsychological test Test of Grocery Shopping testing enterprise: A general
might be used to obtain a Skills, 11–12 test reference to the engagement
general psychological heterogeneity: The extent to of individuals,
profi le of an individual, which individual test items organizations, and
148n5, 286–287, 343, do not measure a single businesses in aspects of
368–373, 481–482, 538– construct but instead measure psychological measurement
539, 550. See also specifi different factors; contrast ranging from
c test batteries with test homogeneity,
instrument development interpretation of, 435 IRT 297 three-stratum theory of
through instrument and, 468 liberties taken cognitive abilities: John B.
administration and with, 433–434 in MPS, 567 Carroll’s conception of
interpretation, 2 origin of, 433 pros and mental abilities and
testing the limits: (1) In cons of, 448–449 processing classifi ed by
ability testing, the psychometric soundness of, three levels or strata, with g
continued administration 435–437 rationale of, 438 at the broadest level followed
of test items beyond the raw material of, 434–435 by eight abilities or processes
level at which the test sample picture from, 435– at the second level and a
manual dictates 437 value of, 437–438 number of more narrowly
discontinuance, usually Theories of Personality (Hall defi ned abilities and
conducted only when the and processes at the third level,
examiner has reason to Lindzey), 378–379 285, 287 Thurstone, Louis
believe an examinee can therapeutic contract: An L., 237, 240, 310, 583 timed
“pass” the higher-level agreement made between a tests, 49 timeline followback
items; (2) in the therapist and a client (TLFB) methodology: A
administration of the regarding various aspects of technique of behavioral
Rorschach test, an the therapeutic process, 474 observation that involves the
optional interview (after therapeutic psychological recording of the frequency
the initial inquiry) in assessment: A and the intensity of a targeted
which the examiner asks collaborative approach behavior over time, 455
questions designed to wherein discovery of TLFB methodology. See
yield additional insights therapeutic insights about timeline followback
into the assessee’s oneself are encouraged methodology
thought processes and and actively promoted by top-down selection: A
personality, 317n3, 429 the assessor throughout process of awarding
test-related behavior, 104– the assessment process, 4 available positions to
105 test-retest reliability: “think aloud” test applicants whereby the
An estimate of reliability administration: A highest scorer is awarded
obtained by correlating method of qualitative the fi rst position, the
pairs of scores from the item analysis requiring next highest scorer the
same people on two examinees to verbalize next position, and so forth
different administrations of their thoughts until all of the positions
the same test, are fi lled, 217
143–144, 153–154, Torrance Tests of Creative
431 testtaker, 17–19, 29– Thinking,
30 I-27 342
error variance and, 141 “think aloud” test Tower of Hanoi, 526–527
measurement equivalence administration: trail-making item: An item
across populations of, 273– (continued) as they take that taps visual-conceptual,
274 a test; useful in visual-motor, planning, and
of personality tests, understanding how other cognitive abilities by
385–391 response individual items function means of a task in which the
styles of, 390–391 in a test and how testtaker must connect the
rights of, 66–70 testtakers interpret or circles in a logical fashion;
thema: In the personality misinterpret the meaning the component of the
theory of Henry of individual items, 265– Halstead-Reitan
Murray, a unit of 266 Neuropsychological Battery
interaction between third moments of called the Trail Making Test
need and press, 435 distribution, 128 third-order is one of the most widely
Thematic Apperception Test factors, 333 Thorndike, used instruments for the
(TAT) APT and, 439 Edward L., 2 31, 232, 292, assessment of brain damage,
528–529 trait: Any 254–255 two-factor theory test situation, including all
distinguishable, relatively of intelligence: Spearman’s the factors that lead to an
enduring way in which one theory of general individual testtaker’s score,
individual varies from intelligence, which 157
another; contrast with postulates the existence of a universe score: In
state, 101 , 379–381, general intellectual ability generalizability theory, a
403, 556–567 existence factor (g) that is partially test score corresponding
of, 101–103 quantifi ed tapped by all other mental to the particular universe
and measured, 103–104 abilities, 283–284, 286–288, being assessed or
trait anxiety, 383 transient 301 evaluated, 157
error: A source of error Tyler Vocational Classifi University of Pennsylvania
attributable to variations cation System, Smell
in the testtaker’s feelings, 395 type: As in Identifi cation Test
moods, or mental state personality type, a (UPSIT), 518 unobtrusive
over time, 152 constellation of traits and measure: A type of measure
translators, 48, 483 states similar in pattern to that does not necessarily
TRIN scale. See True one identifi ed category require the presence or
Response of personality within a cooperation of respondents,
Inconsistency scale taxonomy of often a telling physical trace
personalities, 382 or record,
type A personality: In 464 unrestricted ranges,
I-28 Friedman and 132–133 UPSIT. See
True Response Inconsistency Rosenman’s typology, a University of Pennsylvania
(TRIN) scale, 411, 417 personality characterized Smell Identifi cation Test
true score theory: Also by competitiveness, user norms: Also referred to
referred to as the true haste, restlessness, as program norms,
score model or classical impatience, feelings of descriptive statistics based on
test theory, a system of being time-pressured, a group of testtakers in a
assumptions about and strong needs for given period of time rather
measurement that achievement and than on norms obtained by
includes the notion that a dominance, 382 formal sampling methods,
test score (and even a type B personality: In 111 UT score. See uniform T
response to an individual Friedman and score utility ( also test
item) is composed of a Rosenman’s typology, a utility): In the context of
relatively stable personality characterized psychological testing and
component that actually by traits (e.g., “mellow” assessment, a reference to
is what the test or and “laid-back”) that are how useful a test or
individual item is opposite the Type A assessment technique is for a
designed to measure as personality, 382 particular purpose, 6, 189–
well as a random 190, 192–193, 209
component that is error, unidimensional scale, 237, benefi ts infl
106, 157 true variance: 241 Uniform Guidelines on uencing, 212–215
In the true score model, the Employee Selection clinical, 208
component of variance Procedures, 57 – 58 comparative, 208
attributable to true uniform T score: costs infl uencing,
differences in the ability or Abbreviated UT, 210–212 decision
trait being measured that are a variety of T score used theory and, 189–190,
inherent in an observed score in the 192–193 diagnostic,
or distribution of scores, 140 MMPI-2, 412 units of 208 questions related to,
true-false item, 247 truth-in- measure, 1 universe: In 208–209 reliability and
testing legislation, 57 generalizability theory, the validity infl uencing,
tryout, in test development, total context of a particular
209–210 bias and, 199–203 coeffi (VRIN) scale, 411, 417
theory, 189 cient, 183–184 concept variance: A measure of
utility analysis: A family of of, 172–174 construct, variability equal to the
techniques designed to 173, 193–199, 238, 297 arithmetic mean of the
evaluate the costs and content, 173, 176–180, squares of the differences
benefi ts of testing and not 238 convergent, 197n3 between the scores in a
testing in terms of likely face, 174–176 fairness distribution and their mean,
outcomes, 215 BCG and, 199, 203–207 89–90, 140. See also bias;
formula in, 216, 223–224 generalization, GATB error variance
cut score in, 220–223, 225– and, 552–554 VCAT. See Veterinary
232 expectancy data in, incremental, 184–185 College
216, 224 illustration of, scales, 390–391, 399– Admission Test verbal
217–223 practical 400, 408, 417 of short communication, 47–48
considerations, 224–227 forms, 330–331 verbal functioning tests, 533–
productivity gain and, 223– shrinkage, 270 test 534 verbal, perceptual, and
224 purpose of, 215–216 developers, users and, image rotation (VPR) model:
utility gain: An estimate of 184 utility infl uenced by, A hierarchical model of the
the benefi t, monetary or 209–210 structure of mental abilities,
otherwise, of using a validity coeffi cient: A with a g factor that
particular test or selection correlation coeffi cient contributes to verbal,
method, 216 that provides a measure perceptual, and image
of the relationship rotation abilities in addition
validation: The process of between test scores and to eight more specialized
gathering scores on a criterion abilities, 295
and evaluating validity measure, 183–184 verbal summator, 443 verbal-
evidence, 173 validity scale: A subscale of performance dichotomy,
validation study: Research a test designed to assist 280– 281, 291, 319
that entails gathering in judgments regarding Veterinary College
evidence relevant to how how honestly the Admission Test
well a test measures what testtaker responded and (VCAT), 364
it purports to measure for whether or not observed Viirre, Erik, 212, 213, 512
the purpose of evaluating responses were products vocational assessment,
the validity of a test or of response style, 51–52 VRIN scale. See
other measurement tool, carelessness, deliberate Variable Response
173 efforts to deceive, or Inconsistency scale
validity: A general term unintentional vulnerable abilities: In the
referring to a judgment misunderstanding, 390– CattellHorn model of
regarding how well a 391, 399– intelligence, cognitive
test or other 400, 408, 417 validity abilities that decline with age
measurement tool shrinkage: The decrease in and that do not return to
measures what it item validities that preinjury levels after brain
purports to measure; this inevitably occurs after damage; contrast with
judgment has important cross-validation, 270 maintained abilities, 285
implications regarding values: That which an Vygotsky, Lev
the appropriateness of individual prizes; ideals Semyonovitch, 364–365
inferences made and believed in, 419 variability:
actions taken on the An indication of how scores WAIS. See Wechsler Adult
basis of measurements, in a distribution are scattered Intelligence Scale
108, 110, 170, 172. See or dispersed, 87. See also Washington University
also criterion-related measure of variability Sentence Completion
validity Variable Response Test, 442
Inconsistency
WASI. See Wechsler short forms of, 330–331 Woodcock Reading Mastery
Abbreviated Scale of Stanford-Binet TestsRevised (WRMT-
Intelligence Intelligence Scale v., R), 366–367
WCST-64. See Wisconsin 315 , 327–328 subtests Woodcock-Johnson III (WJ-
Card Sorting Test-64 of, 329 verbal- III), 286,
Card Version performance dichotomy 371–373
Wechsler Abbreviated Scale in, Woodworth Psychoneurotic
of Intelligence (WASI), 280–281, 291, 319 Inventory,
331 Wechsler Memory Scale 41, 401
Wechsler Adult Intelligence (WMS-IV), Woodworth, Robert S., 40–
Scale 271, 536–537 41 word association: A type
(WAIS), 40, 271, 281, Wechsler Preschool and of task that may be used in
305–306 current version of, Primary Scale of personality assessment in
322–324 fourth edition of, Intelligence (WPPSI) which an assessee verbalizes
321–325 heritage of, 321– changes in, 328–329 the fi rst word that comes to
322 psychometric interest in, 327–328 mind in response to a
soundness of, 324–325 standardization stimulus word, 4 40–442,
standardization and norms edition of, 330 441n5, 533 Word
of, 324 subtests of, 322– structure of, 329–330 Association Test, 441 words,
324, 329 subtests of, 328–329 as projective stimuli sentence
Wechsler-Bellevue Weigl’s Test. See Color- completion tests, 442–443
Intelligence Scale, Form Sorting Test word-association tests, 440–
43–44, 291 Welsh code: A shorthand 442
Wechsler, David summary of a testtaker’s Work Preference Inventory
deterioration quotient of, scores on the MMPI (WPI), 576
525 on intelligence, 40, clinical and validity World War I, 1, 40, 54, 178–
280–281, 286, 290, scales, 410, 412 180, 336,
291, 300, 319, Wepman Auditory 401 World War II, 1–2,
322, 324 on short Discrimination Test, 530 394 worldview: The unique
forms, 330 Werner, Heinz, 515 way people interpret and
Wechsler Individual Wertheimer, Max, 530 make sense of their
Achievement What I Like to Do Interest perceptions in light of their
Test-Second Edition (WIAT- Inventory, learning experiences, cultural
II), 352 376 background, and related
Wechsler Intelligence Scale WIAT-II. See Wechsler variables, 422
for Individual WPI. See Work Preference
Children (WISC), 47, Achievement Test- Inventory
272 background of, 325 Second Edition Wide Range WPPSI. See Wechsler
changes to, 325–326 CHC Achievement Test-4, 352 Preschool and Primary
model and, 325–326 WISC. See Wechsler Scale of Intelligence
fourth edition of, 325–327 Intelligence Scale for WRMT-R. See Woodcock
Stanford-Binet Children Reading Mastery Tests-
Intelligence Scale v., Wisconsin Card Sorting Revised
327 – 328 Test-64 Card Version Wundt, Wilhelm Max, 37
subtests of, (WCST-64), 526 Witmer, WWI. See World
329 Lightner, 38 War I WWII. See
Wechsler intelligence tests. WJ-III. See Woodcock- World War II
See also specifi c tests Johnson III WMS-IV. See
z score: A standard score
changes in, 319 Wechsler Memory Scale
derived by calculating the
commonalities among, Wonderlic Personnel Test,
difference between a
321 developers of, 331 548 particular raw score and
items used in, 320–321
the mean and then
dividing by the standard
deviation; a z score
expresses a score in terms
of the number of standard
deviation units that the
raw score is below or
above the mean of the
distribution,
96–97, 100, 115
Zillmer, Eric A., 392

Anda mungkin juga menyukai