See Addiction Accounting Program actuarial prediction: An
Acknowledgment Scale Admission Test approach to predicting ABAP. See American Board (APAT), 364 behavior based on the of Assessment acculturation: The process by application of Psychology which an individual’s empirically ABLE. See Adult Basic thoughts, behaviors, values, demonstrated statistical Learning identity, and worldview rules and probabilities; Examination develop in relation to the contrast with clinical absolute cut score. See fi general thinking, behavior, prediction and xed cut score absolute zero customs, and values of a mechanical prediction, points, 75–77 abstract, particular cultural group, 419 509 ability to, 525–526 abuse: measures of, 419– adaptive behavior: Personal (1) Infl iction of or allowing 420 reacculturation, conduct that one is the infl iction of physical 490 variables related capable of modifying in injury or emotional to, 421–422 age-appropriate ways to impairment that is Achenbach Child Behavior effectively address needs, nonaccidental; (2) the Checklist demands, and challenges, creation of or allowing the (CBCL), 346, 348 94, 349 creation of substantial risk achievement test: adaptive testing: An of physical injury or Evaluation of examination method or emotional impairment that accomplishment or the procedure characterized is nonaccidental; (3) the degree of learning that has by individually tailoring committing of or allowing taken place, usually with presentation of items to the committing of a sexual regard to an academic the testtaker; also offense against a child; area, 20, 351 referred to as tailored contrast with neglect, 142, for educational testing, sequential 502. See also child abuse assessment, 351–357 testing, branched testing, accommodation: (1) In general, 352–363 items and response-contingent Piagetian theory, one of on, 357 minimum testing, 316. See also two basic mental competency, 57, 355–356 computerized adaptive operations through which for predictive purposes, testing humans learn, this one 359 in specifi c subject ADD. See anatomically involving change from areas, 353–357 detailed doll what is already known, acquiescent response style: Addiction Acknowledgment perceived, or thought to fi A way of responding to test Scale t with new information items characterized by (AAS), 489 (contrast with agreement with whatever is addiction, assimilation ) ; (2) in presented; also referred to clinical/counseling assessment, the as acquiescence, 390 ACT assessment for, 488– adaptation of a test, Assessment, 360–361 490 procedure, or situation, or actuarial assessment: An Addiction Potential Scale the substitution of one approach to evaluation (APS), 489 test for another in order to characterized by the Addiction Severity Index, make the assessment application of empirically 489 more suitable for an demonstrated statistical ADHD. See attention defi cit assessee with exceptional rules as a determining hyperactivity disorder needs; (3) in the factor in the assessor’s adjective checklist, 395, workplace, modifi cation judgment and actions; 397 adjustable light beam of or adjustments to job contrast with clinical apparatus, 26 functions or assessment, ADRESSING: A purposely circumstances, 25 , 282 467 – 468 , 509 misspelled word but easy- to-remember acronym to remind assessors of the aggression, 103, 380–381, derived, either by alternate following sources of 394 Aggression assessment: (continued) cultural infl uence: age, Questionnaire, 380–381 some special disability, religion, AHPAT. See Allied Health accommodation made to the ethnicity, social status, Professions Admission assessee or by alternative sexual orientation, Test methods designed to indigenous heritage, AHSGE. See Alabama High measure the same national origin, and School Graduation Exam variable(s), 2 5, 28 gender, 486 Airman Qualifying Exam, alternate forms: Different Adult Basic Learning 337 versions of the same test Examination Alabama High School or measure; contrast with (ABLE), 356 Graduation Exam parallel forms, 144 – 145 advanced placement (AHSGE), 355 , 153–154 program, 354 Alcohol Specifi c Role Play alternate item: A test item to Test, 489 alcoholism, be administered only clinical/counseling under certain conditions I-1 assessment for, 488–490 to replace the affi rmative action: alerting response: A administration of an Voluntary and brightening and existing item on the test, mandatory efforts widening of the eyes in 311 undertaken by federal, response to a stimulus, alternate-forms reliability: state, and local indicative of an infant’s An estimate of the extent to governments, private capacity for which item sampling and employers, and schools responsiveness; contrast other errors have affected to combat with orienting scores on two versions of the discrimination and to response, 290 same test; contrast with promote equal ALI standard: American Law parallelforms reliability, 1 opportunity in education Institute standard of legal 44 –1 45 , 153–154 and employment for all, insanity, which provides American Board of 53, 111 that a person is not Assessment Psychology AFQT. See Armed Forces responsible for criminal (ABAP), 23 Qualifi cation Test conduct if, at the time of American Psychological AGCT. See Army General such conduct, the person Association. See APA Classifi cation lacked substantial Americans with Disabilities Test age norms: Also capacity either to Act, 56 analogue behavioral referred to as age- appreciate the criminality observation: The observation equivalent norms, norms of the conduct or to of a person or persons in an specifi cally designed for conform the conduct to environment designed to use as a reference in the the requirements of the increase the assessor’s context of the age of the law; contrast with the chance of observing targeted testtaker who achieved a Durham standard and the behaviors and interactions, particular score; contrast M’Naghten standard, 461 with grade norms, 118 – 496 analogue study: Research or 119 Allied Health Professions behavioral intervention age scale: A test with items Admission that replicates a variable organized by the age at Test (AHPAT), 364 or variables in ways that which most testtakers are alternate assessment: An are similar to or believed capable of evaluative or diagnostic analogous to the real responding in the way procedure or process that variables the keyed correct; contrast varies from the usual, experimenter wishes to with point scale, 237 , customary, or standardized study; for example, a 314 way a measurement is laboratory study designed to research a phobia of aphagia: A condition in by calculating an average snakes in the wild, 460– which the ability to eat is of all scores in a 461 lost or diminished, 5 33n2 distribution, 80, 84, 86 anatomically detailed doll aphasia: A loss of ability to Armed Forces Qualifi cation (ADD): A human fi gure express oneself or to Test in doll form with understand spoken or (AFQT), 339 accurately represented written language due to a Armed Services Vocational genitalia, typically used neurological defi cit, Aptitude Battery to assist in the evaluation 533–534 (ASVAB), 337–340 of sexually abused apperceive: To perceive in Army Alpha test: An children, 504 terms of past perceptions intelligence and ability anchor protocol: A test (from this verb, the noun test developed by military answer sheet developed apperception is derived), psychologists for use in by a test publisher to 4 33 World War I to screen check the accuracy of Apperceptive Personality literate recruits; contrast examiners’ scoring, 272– Test (APT), with Army Beta test, 336 273 439–440 application Army Beta test: A Anderson, Henry form, 561–562 APS. See nonverbal intelligence Graeme, 565 Addiction Potential Scale and ability test Anderson, Rebecca, APT. See Apperceptive developed by military 352, 353 Angoff, Personality Test aptitude test: psychologists for use William H., 229 A test that usually focuses in World War I to anorexia nervosa, 401 more on informal as opposed screen illiterate and anxiety, 383 to formal learning foreign-born recruits; APA: American experiences and is designed contrast with Army Psychological to measure both learning and Alpha test, 336 Association; in other inborn potential for the Army General Classifi cation sources, particularly purpose of making Test medical texts, this may predictions about the (AGCT), 337 assessment refer to the American testtaker’s future center: An organizationally Psychiatric performance; also referred to standardized procedure for Association, 1 5, 32, as a prognostic test and, evaluation involving multiple 61–63 on anorexia especially with young assessment techniques, 2, nervosa, 401 DSM-IV children, a readiness test, 567 of, 74, 471–472, 478– 357 assimilation: In Piagetian 479 on intelligence, in career counseling, 548– theory, one of two basic 308 on revisions, 269 555 at college level, 361– mental operations APAT. See Accounting 363 dynamic assessment, through which humans Program Admission Test 363–366 for educational learn, this one involving Apgar number: A score on a assessment, 357–366 at the active organization of rating scale developed by elementary-school level, new information into physician 359–361 entrance what is already perceived, examinations for known, and thought; professional or contrast with occupational training, accommodation, 282 I-2 363–364 GATB, 550– assisted suicide, 63–65 Virginia Apgar that 555 at secondary-school AST. See Reitan- embodies a simple, level, 360–362 Indiana Aphasia rapid method of arithmetic mean: Also Screening Test evaluating newborn referred to simply as the astronauts, 564–567 infants, 347 mean, a measure of ASVAB. See Armed central tendency derived Services Vocational Aptitude Battery at risk: by the total number of BDI. See Beck Depression Defi ned in different ways scores, 88–89 Inventory by different school districts, aviators, 564–567 Beck Depression Inventory but in general a reference to (BDI), 182, 480 Beck Self- functioning that is defi cient back stress, 13 bar graph: A Concept Test (BST), 385 and possibly in need of graphic illustration of data behavior raters, 458–459 intervention, 346–349 Atlas, wherein numbers indicative behavior rating scale, 459 Howard, 136 at-risk infant of frequency are set on the behavioral assessment: An or toddler: According to vertical axis, categories are approach to evaluation based IDEA, a child under 3 years set on the horizontal axis, on the analysis of samples of of age who would be in and the rectangle bars that behavior, including the danger of experiencing a describe the data are antecedents and substantial developmental typically noncontiguous, 80– consequences of the delay if early intervention 81 behavior, 452 services were not provided, Barnum effect: The analogue studies in, 348–349 consequence of one’s 460–461 approaches to, attention defi cit belief that a vague 456–464 behavioral hyperactivity disorder personality description observation and rating (ADHD), 346, 348 truly describes oneself scales in, 457–559 attitude: A presumably when in reality that behaviors measured in, learned disposition to description may apply to 454 issues in, 464–467 react in some almost anyone; location of, 456 characteristic manner to sometimes referred participants in, 454 a particular stimulus, to as the “Aunt Fanny psychophysiological 577–578 effect” because the same methods of, in consumer psychology, personality might be 462–464 purpose of, 456 582–583 in educational applied to anyone’s Aunt role play in, 462 self- assessment, 376–377 Fanny, 506, 508 basal monitoring in, 460 implicit, 583 inventories, level: A stage in a test situational performance 376–377, 408 achieved by a testtaker by measures in, Attitude Interest Scale, meeting some preset 461–462 timing of, 408 Auditory criterion to continue to be 454–455 traditional Apperception Test, 444 tested-for example, approach v., 453 , 455, authentic assessment: responding correctly to two 457 unobtrusive measures Also known consecutive items on an in, 464 as performance-based ability test that contains behavioral neurology: The assessment, evaluation increasingly diffi cult items subspecialty area within on relevant, meaningful may establish a “base” from the medical specialty of tasks that may be which to continue testing; neurology that focuses on conducted to examine contrast with ceiling level, brainbehavior learning of academic 317 relationships, 512 subject matter but that base rate: An index, usually behavioral observation: demonstrates the expressed as a proportion, Monitoring the actions of student’s transfer of that of the extent to which a others or oneself by study to real-world particular trait, behavior, visual or electronic means activities, 374–375 characteristic, or attribute while recording average deviation: A measure exists in a population, 1 quantitative and/or of variability derived by 89, 191–192, 220, 222 qualitative information summing the absolute BASIC ID, 588–589 regarding those actions, value of all the scores in a BCG formula. See typically for diagnostic or distribution and dividing BrogdenCronbach-Gleser related purposes and formula either to design intervention or to pulse and blood pressure, possible abnormalities that measure the outcome of 463 entails the introduction of an intervention, biopsychosocial assessment: radioactive material into the 10–11, 380, 457–459, A multidisciplinary approach brain for the purpose of 589 bell-shaped curve. to assessment that includes tracking its fl ow, 542 See normal curve Bender, exploration of relevant brand names, 589–590 Lauretta, 530–531 biological, psychological, Breathalyzer, 156 Bender Visual-Motor Gestalt social, cultural, and Bricklin Perceptual Scales Test: A widely used environmental variables for (BPS), 109–110 Briggs, screening tool for the purpose of evaluating Katharine Cook, 557–558 neuropsychological defi how such variables may have broad-band measures, 459 cit that entails the contributed to the Brogden, Hubert E., 216 copying and recall of development and Brogden-Cronbach-Gleser designs; developed by maintenance of a presenting (BCG) formula, 216, Lauretta Bender, it is also problem, 473 Birkeland, 223–224 referred to simply as “the Scott, 260, 261 bivariate Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Bender,” 481, 530–533 distribution: Also known as a Motor Profi ciency, 530 Bennet Mechanical scatterplot, scatter diagram, BST. See Beck Self-Concept Comprehension or scattergram, a graphic Test burnout: A Test, 548 bias: As representation of correlation psychological syndrome of applied to tests, a factor accomplished by the simple emotional exhaustion, inherent within a test that graphing of the coordinate depersonalization, and systematically prevents points for values of the X - reduced personal accurate, impartial variable and the Y -variable, accomplishment, 577 Buros, measurement, 106, 199 129–133 Oscar Krisen, 31 business intercept, 200 observer, Black Intelligence Test settings, 22. See also career 466–467 in personality of Cultural counseling; consumer assessment, 387–388 rating Homogeneity, 304–307 psychology; employment error and, 202–203 slope, Blacky Pictures Test, assessment 200 of test items, 264 393 blueprinting, 176– Butcher, James, 411–412, validity and, 199–203 Big 177 bookmark method: 411n10 Five, 404 bimodal An IRT-based distribution: A distribution method of setting cut California Psychological in which the central scores that uses an item Inventory (CPI 434), 392 tendency consists of two book, where items are California Verbal Learning scores, occurring an equal placed in ascending Test-II number of times, that are order of diffi culty and (CVLT-II), 536 the most frequently with experts making CALS. See Checklist of occurring scores in the judgments and literally Adaptive Living Skills distribution, 82, 86 “bookmarking” items Campbell Interest and Skill binary-choice item, 247, 249 that exhibit the optimal Survey, 549 Binet, Alfred, 39, 44, 75, level of diffi culty for CAP. See Child Abuse 280, 291, 300, 303 Binet- test items, 231 Potential Inventory Simon Scale, 44, 303 Boring, Edwin G., 279 CAPA: An acronym that biofeedback: A generic term Bosnia, 179–180 stands for computer that refers to Boston Naming Test, 528 assisted psychological psychophysiological BPS. See Bricklin assessment, 13–14, 63, assessment techniques Perceptual Scales brain scan: 66, 510 designed to gauge, display, More formally referred to as career counseling ability and record a continuous a radioisotope scan, a and aptitude assessment monitoring of selected procedure in neurology used in, 548–555 CALS and, biological processes such as to detect tumors and other 558–559 personal correlation v., 125 CBA. central tendency error: A interest assessment in, See curriculum-based type of rating error 545–548 personality assessment wherein the rater exhibits assessment in, 555–558 CBCL. See Achenbach a general reluctance to transitions and, 559–560 Child Behavior issue ratings at either the Career Interest Inventory, Checklist positive or negative 549 Cascio, Wayne, 231 case CBM. See curriculum-based extreme and so all or history data: Records, measurement most ratings cluster in the transcripts, and other CCAI. See Cross-Cultural middle of the rating accounts in any media that Adaptability Inventory continuum, 202 preserve archival CDR. See clinical data information, offi cial and recorder CDT. See clock- informal accounts, and other drawing test ceiling, 317 I-4 data and items relevant to an ceiling effect: Diminished assessee, 10 cerebral angiogram: A utility of a tool of in clinical/counseling diagnostic procedure in assessment in assessment, neurology that entails the distinguishing testtakers at 479–480 in injection of a tracer the high end of the ability, neuropsychological element into the trait, or other attribute assessment, bloodstream prior to being measured, 519–521 taking X-rays of the 249–250, 298 ceiling cerebral area, 542 level: A stage in a test achieved by a testtaker as a CFA. See confi rmatory result of meeting some preset factor analysis I-3 Chapple v. Ganger, 539 criterion to discontinue Caselman, Tonia, 448 testing-for example, CHC model: An abbreviation CAT. See computerized responding incorrectly to two for the Cattell-Horn- adaptive testing consecutive items on an Carroll model of CAT: An acronym that ability test that contains cognitive abilities, 285– stands for a neurological increasingly diffi cult items 288 scanning technology may establish a presumed K-ABC and, 369 called computerized axial “ceiling” on the testtaker’s Stanford-Binet Intelligence tomography, 542 ability; contrast with basal Scale and, categorical scaling: A system level and testing the limits, 311, 314–315 of scaling in which 317 WISC and, 325–326 stimuli are placed into central nervous system: All WJ-III and, 371 checklist: one of two or more of the neurons or nerve A questionnaire formatted to alternative categories that cells in the brain and the allow a person to mark items differ quantitatively with spinal cord; contrast with indicative of information respect to some the peripheral nervous such as the presence or continuum, 237, 242 system, 512 absence of a specifi ed category response curve. See central processing: behavior, thought, event, or item characteristic curve Computerized scoring, circumstance, category scoring. See interpretation, or other adjective, 395, 397 class scoring Cattell, conversion of raw test for preschool James McKeen, 38–39 data that is physically assessment, 346, Cattell, Raymond B., 285, transported from the same 348–349 403–404 or other test sites; Checklist of Adaptive Living Cattell-Horn-Carroll model. contrast with Skills See CHC model teleprocessing and local (CALS), 558–559 child Cattell Infant Intelligence processing, 13 abuse: Nonaccidental infl Scale (CIIS), 3 9 causation, iction or creation of conditions that result in a to as category scoring, a for addiction and substance child’s physical injury or method of evaluation in abuse, emotional impairment, or a which test responses earn 488–490 case history sexual offense committed credit toward placement in a data in, 479–480 of child against a child, 502 particular class or category abuse and neglect, 502– emotional and behavioral with other testtakers. 505 signs of, Sometimes testtakers must of competency to stand 503–504 issues of meet a set number of trial, 492, reporting, 504 legal responses corresponding to a 494–495 of criminal mandate regarding, particular criterion in order responsibility, 495–496 in 502 physical signs to be placed in a specifi c custody evaluations, 498, of, 503 risk category or class; contrast 500–502 of emotional assessment in, 505 with cumulative scoring and injury, 497–498 forensic Child Abuse Potential ipsative scoring, 253 psychological assessment, Inventory classifi cation: A rating, 490–498 general (CAP), 191–192, 505 categorizing, or principles of, 484 child neglect: The failure by “pigeonholing” with interviews in, 473– an adult responsible for a respect to two or more 479 mental disorders child to exercise a criteria; contrast with diagnosed in, minimum degree of care in screening, selection, 471–473 overview of, providing the child with and placement, 469–471 profi ling and, food, clothing, shelter, 560 – 561 498–499 psychological education, medical care, classroom, psychometrics in, report of, 505–510 and supervision, 238–239 CLEP. See College psychological tests in, 502–505 Child Sexual Level Examination 480–482 of readiness for Behavior Inventory, 350 Program parole or probation, child with a disability: (1) In clinical data recorder 496–497 general, according to IDEA, (CDR), 458–459 clinical treatment guided a child with mental prediction: In clinical by, 470 retardation, hearing practice, applying a clock-drawing test (CDT): A impairments (including clinician’s own training and technique used in clinical deafness), speech or clinical experience as a neuropsychological language impairments, visual determining factor in examinations whereby impairments (including clinical judgment and the testtaker draws the blindness), serious emotional actions; contrast with face of a clock, usually disturbance, orthopedic actuarial prediction and indicating a particular impairments, autism, mechanical prediction, 508 time, that is then traumatic brain injury, other – 510 evaluated for distortions health impairments, or clinical psychology: That that may be symptomatic specifi c learning disabilities; branch of psychology that of dementia or other (2) for a child aged 3 through has as its primary focus neurological or 9, according to IDEA, a child the prevention, diagnosis, psychiatric conditions, experiencing developmental and treatment of 528 delay in physical or abnormal behavior, 469. Cloud Picture Test, cognitive, social, emotional, See also clinical/ 426n1 Cocaine Risk communication, or adaptive counseling assessment Response Test, 489 development, 352 clinical settings, 21 clinical Code of Fair Testing China, 35–36 utility, 208 Practices in CIIS. See Cattell Infant clinical/counseling Education (Joint Intelligence Scale Civil assessment. See also Rights Act of 1991, 205, 571 Committee of culturally informed class scoring: Also referred psychological assessment Testing Practices), 62 coeffi cient of issues of, 47–49 comparative code of professional generalizability: In scaling: In test ethics: A body of generalizability theory, an development, a method guidelines that sets forth index of the infl uence of developing ordinal the standard of care that particular facets have scales through the use of expected of members of a on a test score, 158 a sorting task that entails profession, 54 coeffi cient of inter-scorer judging a stimulus in coeffi cient alpha: Also reliability, 151 coeffi cient of comparison with every referred to as stability: An estimate of test- other stimulus used on Cronbach’s alpha and retest reliability obtained the test, 237, 242 alpha, a statistic widely during time intervals of six comparative utility, 208 employed in test months or longer, 143 compensatory model of construction and used to Coggins, Margaret, 493 selection: A model of assist in deriving an Cognitive Behavioral applicant selection based on estimate of reliability; Driver’s the assumption that high more technically, it is Inventory, 541 scores on one attribute can equal to the mean of all cognitive development, balance out low scores on split-half reliabilities, stages of, 282 cognitive another attribute, 227 149–150 coeffi cient of interview: A type of competence to stand trial: correlation: Symbolized by hypnotic interview without Understanding the charges r, the correlation coeffi cient the hypnotic induction; the against one and being able to is an index of the strength of interviewee is encouraged assist in one’s own defense, the linear relationship to use imagery and focused 492, 494–495 Competency between two continuous retrieval to recall Screening Test, 495 variables expressed as a information, 475 completion item, 247, 249 number that can range from – collaborative interview: In composite judgment: An 1 to 1. Although different clinical psychology, a averaging of multiple ratings statistics may be used to helping, open-ended of judgments for the purpose calculate a coeffi cient of interview wherein both of minimizing rater error, correlation, the most parties work together on a 466 frequently used is the common mission of computer assisted Pearson r, discovery, insight, and psychological 124 – 125 , 126–128, enlightenment, 475 assessment. See CAPA 150 coeffi cient of collaborative psychological computerized adaptive determination: A value assessment: A process of testing (CAT): An indicating how much assessment wherein the interactive, variance is shared by two assessor and assessee computeradministered variables being calculated; work as “partners” from testtaking process this value is obtained by initial contact through fi wherein items presented squaring the obtained nal feedback. See also to the testtaker are based correlation coeffi cient, therapeutic psychological in part on the testtaker’s multiplying by 100, and assessment, 4 performance on expressing the result as a college level aptitude tests, previous items, 248, percentage, which indicates 361–363 College Level 274–275 the amount of variance Examination Program computerized axial accounted for by the (CLEP), 354–355, 357 tomography. See correlation coeffi cient, 127 college yearbook photos, 465 CAT concurrent coeffi cient of equivalence: Color Inkblot Therapeutic validity: A form of An estimate of parallel- Storytelling, criterion-related validity forms reliability or 448 that is an index of the alternate-forms Color-Form Sorting Test, degree to which a test reliability, 144 526 communication, cultural score is related to some criterion measure neuropsychological context, consultative report: A type of obtained at the same time such as in response to interpretive report (concurrently), 180, administration of items in the designed 182 confi dence interval: A Boston Naming Test, range or band of test scores 528–529 that is likely to contain the Connors Rating Scales- I-5 “true score,” 167 Revised confi dential information: (CRS-R), 346, 348 co- consultative report: Communication between norming: The test norming (continued) to provide a professional and a process conducted on two or expert and detailed client, along with other more tests using the same analysis of test data that data obtained by the sample of testtakers; when mimics the work of an professional in the course used to validate all of the expert consultant, 13 of a professional tests being normed, this consumer panel: A sample of relationship that the process may also be referred respondents, selected by professional has an to as co-validation, 270 demographic and other ethical obligation not to construct: An informed, criteria, who have disclose; contrast with scientifi c idea developed contracted with a privileged information, or generated to describe consumer or marketing 68 or explain behavior; some research fi rm to respond confi dentiality: The ethical examples of constructs on a periodic basis to obligation of include “intelligence,” surveys, questionnaires, professionals to keep “personality,” and related research confi dential all “anxiety,” and “job instruments regarding communications made or satisfaction,” various products, entrusted to them in confi services, and/or 102, 193 construct dence, although advertising or other validity: A judgment about professionals may be the appropriateness of promotional efforts, 585 compelled to disclose inferences drawn from test consumer psychology: The such confi dential scores regarding individual branch of social communications under standings on a variable called psychology dealing court order or other a construct, 173, 193 primarily with the extraordinary conditions, development, in classrooms, such as when such advertising, and 238 evidence of, communications refer to marketing of products 194–199 of a third party in imminent and services, 581 intelligence danger; contrast with tests, 297 as attitude measurement in, privacy right, 68 unifying 582–583 motivation confi rmatory factor analysis concept, 194 research methods in, (CFA): A constructed-response 586–591 class of mathematical format: A form of test surveys in, item requiring the 584–586 procedures employed when a factor structure testtaker to construct or content sampling: The that has been explicitly create a response, as variety of the subject hypothesized is tested opposed to simply matter contained in the for its fi t with the selecting a response items; frequently referred observed relationships (e.g., items on essay to in the context of the between the variables, examinations, fi ll-in- variation between 198, the-blank, and short- individual test items in a 334–335 confrontation answer tests); contrast test or between test items naming: Identifying a with selected-response in two or more tests and pictured stimulus in a format, 245 also referred to as item I-6 COPS. See criterion-focused sampling, 140 rated) leads to a more or occupational personality content validity: A judgment less favorable rating than scales regarding how adequately would have been made core subtest: One of a test’s a test (or other tool of had the dissimilarity not subtests that is routinely measurement) samples existed, 466 administered during any behavior representative of control group: (1) In an administration of the test; the universe of behavior experiment, the untreated contrast with it was designed to group; (2) in test supplemental or optional sample, 173, 176 development by means of subtest, 322 blueprinting and, 176– empirical criterion keying, a correlation: An 177 in classrooms, 238 group of randomly selected expression of the culture and relativity of, testtakers who do not degree and direction 178–180 quantifi cation necessarily have in common of correspondence of, 177–178, 177–179 the shared characteristic of between two things, content validity ratio (CVR): the standardization sample, when each thing is A formula, developed by 407 Controlled Word continuous in nature, C. H. Lawshe, used to Association Test, 533 124–125 gauge agreement among convenience sample, 116 causation v., 125 coeffi raters regarding how convergent evidence: With cient of, 124–125, 126– essential an individual reference to construct 128, 150 graphic test item is for inclusion validity, data from other representations of, 129– in a test, 178–179 measurement instruments 135 Pearson r, 126 – 128 content-referenced testing designed to measure the , 150 perfect, 125 and same or a similar construct as regression and, 133–135 assessment. See the test being construct- Spearman’s rho, 128–129 criterionreferenced testing validated and that all point to costs, utility infl uenced by, and assessment the same judgment or 210–212 counseling continuous scales, 72–73 conclusion with regard to a psychology: A branch of contralateral control: test or other tool of psychology that has to do Phenomenon resulting from measurement; contrast with with the prevention, the fact that each of the two discriminant evidence, 197 diagnosis, and treatment of cerebral hemispheres convergent thinking: A abnormal behavior, with receives sensory deductive reasoning emphasis on “everyday” information from the process that entails recall types of concerns and opposite side of the body and consideration of facts problems such as those and also controls motor as well as a series of related to marriage, family, responses on the opposite logical judgments to academics, and career, 469. side of the body; narrow down solutions See also clinical/counseling understanding of this and eventually arrive at assessment counseling phenomenon is necessary in one solution; contrast settings, 21 understanding brain- with divergent thinking, Couples Interaction Scoring behavior relationships and 342 System, in diagnosing convergent validity: Data 459 co-validation: The neuropsychological defi indicating test validation process cits, 513 that a test measures the conducted on two or more contrast effect: A potential same construct as another tests using the same sample source of error in test purporting to of testtakers; when used in behavioral ratings when a measure the same conjunction with the dissimilarity in the construct, 197n3 creation of norms or the observed behaviors (or revision of existing norms, Cooperative Achievement other things being Test, 354 this process may also be referred to as co-norming, deriving meaning from (CCAI), 559 cross- 270 – 271 test scores by evaluating species research, 384 cross- CPI 434. See California an individual’s score with validation: A revalidation on Psychological reference to a set standard a sample of testtakers other Inventory cranial nerves, (or criterion); contrast than the testtakers on whom 523–524 creativity tests, with normreferenced test performance was 341–343 credentialing, 22– testing and assessment, originally found to be a valid 23 criminal responsibility, 122 – 124 , 155, 235– predictor of some criterion, 495–496 criterion 236 criterion-related validity: 270–271 contamination: A state in A judgment regarding how CRS-R. See Connors Rating which a criterion measure is adequately a score or index ScalesRevised itself based, in whole or in on a test or other tool of CRUST. See part, on a predictor measure, measurement can be used to Cultural/Regional 181 infer an individual’s most Uppercrust Savvy Test criterion: The standard probable standing on some crystallized intelligence: In against which a test or a measure of Cattell’s two-factor theory of test score is evaluated; interest (the criterion), 173, intelligence, acquired skills this standard may take 175, and knowledge that are many forms, including a 180 CAP Inventory highly dependent on formal specifi c behavior or set and, 191–192 in and informal education; of behaviors, 122, classrooms, 238 contrast with fl uid 181–182, 404 criterion concurrent, 180, 182 intelligence, 285 – 287 group: A reference group of criterion characteristics cultural issues testtakers who share in, 181–182 decision communication, 47– characteristics and whose theory, test utility and, 49 content validity responses to test items serve 189–190, 192–193 and, 178–180 as a standard by which items expectancy data and, evaluation standards, will be included or 185–189 incremental, 49–50 evolving discarded from the fi nal 184–185 of interviews, interest in, 42–47 version of a scale; the shared 479 predictive, 180, general principles of, characteristic of the criterion 182–183, 191–192 484–485 group group will vary as a function validity coeffi cient membership, 51–53 of the nature and scope of and, 183–184 intelligence testing, 42–46, the test being developed, critical incidents technique: 69, 404 In workplace settings, a 302–308 minority empirical criterion keying procedure that entails cultures, 47, 205– and, 404–406 recording employee 207, MMPI and, 406–412 behavior evaluated as 302–308 in personality MMPI-2 and, 410–412 in positive or negative by a assessment, 389, 400, personality assessment, supervisor or other rater, 418–422 404–418 572 Cronbach, Lee J., 157– public criterion-focused 158, 216 cross-battery policy, 53 occupational personality assessment: Evaluation that culturally informed scales (COPS), 556 employs tests from psychological assessment: criterion-referenced testing different test batteries and An approach to evaluation and assessment: Also entails interpretation of data that is keenly perceptive referred to as domain- from specifi ed tests to about and responsive to referenced testing and provide a comprehensive issues of acculturation, assessment and content- assessment, 287 values, identity, worldview, referenced testing and Cross-Cultural Adaptability language, and other assessment, a method of Inventory culture-related variables as evaluation and a way of they may affect the evaluation process or the favor people from any child evaluation in, 501– interpretation of resulting culture, 303 502 parent evaluation in, data, 137–138, 389 cumulative scoring: A 500–501 projective disagreements regarding, method of scoring whereby techniques used in, 501 482 interviews in, 486–487 points or scores accumulated tender years doctrine managed care and, 487– on individual items or and, 498, 500 488 model for teaching, subtests are tallied and then, cut score: Also referred to 484–485 questions about, the higher the total sum, the as a cutoff score, a 483 higher the individual is reference point shifting cultural lenses in, presumed to be on the (usually numerical) 483, 486 ability, trait, or other derived as a result of Cultural/Regional Uppercrust characteristic being judgment and used to Savvy measured; contrast with divide a set of data into Test (CRUST), 306–307 class scoring and ipsative two or more classifi culture: The socially scoring, 104 curriculum- cations, with some transmitted behavior based assessment (CBA): A action to be taken or patterns, beliefs, and general term referring to some inference to be products of work of a schoolbased evaluations that made on the basis of particular population, clearly and faithfully refl ect these classifi cations, community, or group of what is being taught, 357 6–7, 225 people, 42 curriculum-based fi xed, 226 for high stakes Culture Fair Test of measurement (CBM): A decisions, 228 multiple, Intelligence, 304, type of curriculumbased 226 relative, 225–226 306–307 culture assessment characterized setting of, 227–232 in loading: An index of the by the use of standardized utility analysis, 220–223, magnitude to which a test measurement procedures 225–232 incorporates the to derive local norms to CVLT-II. See vocabulary, concepts, be used in the evaluation California Verbal traditions, knowledge, and of student performance Learning Test-II CVR. feelings associated with a on curriculum-based See content validity particular culture, 303–306 tasks, 357 ratio dangerousness, culture specifi c tests, 43 curvilinearity: Usually with 491–494 culture-fair intelligence regard to graphs or test: A test or assessment correlation scatterplots, DAP test. See Draw a process designed to the degree to which the Person test DAP:SPED. See minimize the infl uence of plot or graph is Draw a Person: culture on various aspects characterized by Screening Procedure for of the evaluation curvature, 129 Emotional procedures, such as the custody evaluation: A Disturbance administration instructions, psychological Darwin, Charles, 36–37 the item content, the assessment of parents or DAS. See Differential responses required of the guardians and their Abilities Scale DAT. See testtaker, and the parental capacity and/or Dental Admission Test interpretations made from of children and their data the resulting data, 304, 306 parental needs and safekeeping of, 69 culture-free intelligence preferences—usually statistics test: In psychometrics, undertaken for the describing, 77–92 the ideal of a test that is purpose of assisting a data reduction, 402–404 devoid of the infl uence court in making a Daubert v. Merrell Dow of any particular culture decision about awarding Pharmaceuticals, and therefore does not custody, 500 59 – 61 , 539 decision study: Conducted at 317, 319, 327, 330, 353 471–472, 479 third the conclusion of a developmental milestone: edition v., 478 – 479 generalizability study, Important event during the diagnostic information: In this research is designed course of one’s life that may educational contexts, test to explore the utility and be marked by the acquisition, or other data used to value of test scores in presence, or growth of pinpoint a student’s diffi making decisions, 158 certain abilities or skills or by culties for the purpose of decision theory: A body of the failure, impairment, or remediating them; methods used to cessation of such abilities or contrast with evaluative quantitatively evaluate skills, 519–520 information, 366 selection procedures, developmental norms: Norms diagnostic test: A tool used diagnostic classifi derived on the basis of to make a diagnosis, cations, therapeutic any trait, ability, skill, or usually to identify areas interventions, or other other characteristic that is of defi cit to be targeted assessment or presumed to develop, for intervention, 20, 366 intervention-related deteriorate, or otherwise for educational procedures in terms of be affected by assessment, 366–368 how optimal they are chronological age, school group, 368 math, 367–368 (most typically from a grade, or stage of life, reading, 366–367, 368 cost-benefi t perspective), 120 diagnostic utility, 208 diary 189–190, 192–193 deviation IQ: A variety of panel: A variety of decision-theoretic approach, standard score used to consumer panel in which to setting cut scores, 231 report “intelligence respondents have agreed to declarative memory: quotients” (IQs) with a keep diaries of their Memory of factual mean set at 100 and a thoughts and/or behaviors, material; contrast with standard deviation set at 585 procedural memory, 534 – 15; on the Stanford-Binet, dichotomous test item: A 536 Delayed Response test, it is also referred to as a test item or question that 316–317 dementia, 521– test composite and can be answered with 522, 533 demoralization, represents an index of only one of two 413 Dental Admission Test intelligence derived from response (DAT), 364 deterioration a comparison between the quotient: Also referred to performance of an as a deterioration index, individual testtaker and I-8 this is a pattern of subtest the performance of other options, such as true- scores on a Wechsler test testtakers of the same age false or yesno, 159 that Wechsler himself in the test’s Dietz, Park, 494 viewed as suggestive of standardization sample, DIF. See differential item neurological defi cit, 525 313 functioning diagnosis: A description or DIF analysis: In IRT, a conclusion reached on the process of group-by- I-7 basis of evidence and group analysis of item developmental delay: Slower opinion through a process response curves for the than expected progress of distinguishing the purpose of evaluating (usually on the basis of nature of something and measurement instrument age norms) with regard to ruling out alternative or item equivalence physical, cognitive, conclusions, 20 across different groups of social, emotional, Diagnostic and Statistical testtakers, 274 adaptive, or Manual of Mental DIF items: In IRT, test communication-related Disorders IV (DSM-IV) items that respondents expansion of one’s ability (APA), 74, 471–472 from different groups, or potential, 94, revised (DSM-IV-TR), who are presumably at the same level of the more of the major life possible; contrast with underlying construct activities of an individual, convergent thinking, 342 being measured, have 29–30, DMM. See Drinking different probabilities 63, 235, 349, 485, 543, Motives Measure of endorsing as a 548 discrete scales, 72 DOC. See Discussion of function of their group discriminant analysis: A Organizational membership, 274 family of statistical Culture domain Differential Abilities Scale techniques used to shed light sampling: (1) A sample (DAS), on the relationship between of behaviors from all 200–201, 335 differential certain variables and two or possible behaviors that item functioning (DIF): In more naturally occurring could be indicative of a IRT, a phenomenon in which groups, 231 particular construct; (2) a the same test item yields one discriminant evidence: With sample of test items from result for members of one reference to construct all possible items that group and a different result validity, data from could be used to measure for members of another a test or other a particular construct, 1 group, presumably as a result measurement instrument 04n1, 157 of group differences that are showing little domain-referenced testing not associated with group relationship between test and assessment. See differences in the construct scores or other variables criterionreferenced being measured, 274 with which the scores on testing and assessment diffuse lesion, 514 the test being Draw a Person: Screening dimensional qualitative constructvalidated should Procedure for Emotional research: An adaptation of not theoretically be Disturbance (DAP: Lazarus’s multimodal correlated; contrast with SPED), 447 clinical approach for use in convergent evidence, 197 Draw a Person (DAP) test, qualitative research – 198 446 Drinking Motives applications and designed to discrimination: In IRT, the Measure (DMM), 23 drug ensure that the research is degree to which an item addiction, clinical/counseling comprehensive and differentiates among assessment for, 488–490 systematic from a people with higher or drug testing, 569–570 psychological perspective lower levels of the trait, and is guided by discussion DSM-IV. See Diagnostic ability, or whatever it is questions based on the seven that is being measured and Statistical Manual of modalities (or dimensions) by a test, 52, 57–58, 159 Mental Disorders IV named in Lazarus’s model, Discussion of Organizational DSM-IV-TR: Abbreviation which are summarized by the Culture for acronym BASIC ID (DOC), 580–581 distinct Diagnostic and (behavior, affect, sensation, groups, evidence from, 196– Statistical Manual of imagery, cognition, 197 distractors, 245 Mental Disorders, interpersonal relations, and distribution: In a Fourth Edition, Text drugs); Cohen’s adaptation psychometric context, a set Revision (published in of Lazarus’s work adds an of test scores arrayed for May 2000), a slightly eighth dimension, recording or study, 78 sociocultural, changing the modifi ed version of divergent thinking: A acronym to BASIC IDS, 5 88 DSM-IV (published in reasoning process direct estimation, 243 characterized by fl 1994), disability: As defi ned in the exibility of thought, 471–472, 479 Americans with Disabilities originality, and dual-easel format, Act of 1990, a physical or imagination, making 350 Dugdale, mental impairment that several different solutions Richard, 294 substantially limits one or Durham standard: A standard of brain lesions and electrode inserted directly of legal insanity in abnormalities, 542 into the muscle, 5 42 Durham v. United States economic benefi ts, elementary-school wherein the defendant 213–214 economic aptitude tests, 359–361 was not found culpable costs, 210–211 ECSP. Ellis Island, 42–43, 46 for criminal action if his See Exceptional Case EMG. See unlawful act was the Study electromyograph emotional product of a mental Project educational expression, 465 emotional disease or defect; contrast assessment achievement injury: A term sometimes with the ALI standard tests for, 351–357 aptitude used synonymously with and the M’Naghten tests for, 357–366 authentic mental suffering, emotional standard, 496 assessment, 373–374 harm, and pain and Dusky v. United States, 492 diagnostic tests for, 366– suffering to convey duty to warn: A legally 368 peer appraisal, 375–376 psychological damage, mandated obligation—to performance assessment, 497–498 advise an endangered third 373–375 portfolio emotional intelligence: A party of their peril—which assessment, 373–375 popularization of aspects may override patient psychoeducational test of Gardner’s theory of privilege; therapists and batteries for, multiple intelligences, assessors may have a legal 368–373 of study with emphasis on the duty to warn when a client habits, interests, and notions of interpersonal expresses intent to hurt a attitudes, 376–377 and intrapersonal third party in any way, Educational Resources intelligence, 284 ranging from physical Information empirical criterion keying: violence to disease Center (ERIC), 32 The process of using transmission, 491 educational settings, 20– criterion groups to dynamic assessment: An 21 develop test items, interactive approach to testing and assessment in, where the scoring or psychological assessment 345–377 keying of items has been that usually follows a Educational Testing Service demonstrated model of evaluation (ETS), 32 empirically to followed by intervention Edwards Personal Preference differentiate among of some sort, and then Schedule groups of testtakers, further evaluation, 4, (EPPS), 253, 396, 555, 404–406 363–366 567 employment dynamic characteristic: A EEG. See assessment trait, state, or ability application form in, electroencephalograph presumed to be ever- 561–562 attitude and, changing as a function EEOC. See Equal Employment 577–578 of cognitive of situational and ability, 570–571 cognitive experiences; Opportunity diversity and, 570– contrast with static Commission egalitarianism, 571 interviews in, characteristic, 153 53 elaboration, 342 electroencephalograph 563 letters of dynamometer, 77 recommendation in, (EEG): A machine that records electrical activity of 562–563 motivation and, easel format, 350 eating 574–577 organizational disorders, 26, 198–199 the brain by means of electrodes pasted to the culture and, 578–581 echoencephalograph: In performance tests in, 563– neurology, a machine that scalp, 542 567 physical tests in, 567– transforms electrical energy electromyograph (EMG): A 570 portfolio assessment into sound energy for the machine that records in, 563 productivity and, purpose of diagnostic studies electrical activity of 571–574 résumé and letter muscles by means of an of application in, 561 error variance: In the true Psychological Tests and screening, selection, score model, the Diagnostic classifi cation, component of variance Aids (APA), 62 ethics: and placement in, 560– attributable to random A body of principles of 561 English profi ciency sources irrelevant to the right, tests, 354 trait or ability the test proper, or good conduct; Entrance Examination for purports to measure in contrast with laws, 54 ETS. Schools of an observed score or See Educational Testing Nursing (RNEE), 364 distribution of scores; Service eugenics: The environment, testing, 24, 28, common sources of science of improving 29–30 episodic memory: error variance include qualities of a breed through Memory for facts but only those related to test intervention with factors within a particular context or construction (including related to heredity, 45 situation; contrast with item or content evaluation standards, cultural semantic memory, 535 – 536 sampling), test issues regarding, 49–50 EPPS. See Edwards Personal administration, and test evaluative information: Test Preference Schedule scoring and or other data used to Equal Employment interpretation, 1 05–106, make judgments such as Opportunity 140 class placement, pass-fail, Commission (EEOC), 57 from assessment situation, and admit-reject equal-appearing intervals, 142–143 summary of, decisions; contrast with 243 equipercentile method: A 152–153 from test diagnostic information, procedure for comparing administration, 141 from 366 scores on two or more tests test construction, 140 from event recording, 455 (as in the creation of national test scoring and everyday accommodations, anchor norms) that entails interpretation, 29–30 evolutionary view of calculating percentile norms 141–142 essay item, mental disorder: for each test and then 247, 249 estimate of inter- The view that an identifying the score on each item consistency. See attribution test that corresponds to the inter-item consistency percentile, 121 estimated true score error: Collectively, all of the transformations, 202 eta I-9 factors other than what a squared, 129n8 ethical issues evolutionary view of mental test purports to measure assisted suicide, 63–65 disorder: (continued) of that contribute to scores computerized tests, 63, mental disorder requires a on the test; error is a 66 ethics code, 54 scientifi c judgment (from variable in all testing and general principles of, an evolutionary assessment, 73, 105. See 484 informed consent, perspective) that there also error variance; 66–67 informed of test fi exists a failure of reliability ndings, 67–68 least function as well as a rating, 202–203 stigmatizing label, 69– value judgment (from the transient, 152 70 people with perspective of social error of central tendency: disabilities, 63 privacy values) that the failure is Less than accurate rating and confi dentiality, 68– harmful to the individual, or evaluation by a rater or 69 professional 472 judge due to that rater’s guidelines, 61–62 Exceptional Case Study general tendency to make testtaker’s rights, 66–70 Project (ECSP), ratings at or near the test-user qualifi cations, 62–63 494 midpoint of the scale; executive contrast with generosity Ethical Standards for the functions: In error and severity error, Distribution of neuropsychology, 387 organizing, planning, cognitive fl exibility, extended scoring report: A example, the number of items inhibition of impulses, type of scoring report in the test, the amount of and other activities that provides not only training the test scorers have associated with the a listing of scores but had, and the purpose of the frontal and prefrontal statistical data as well, test administration, 157 lobes of the brain, 526– 13 factor analysis: A class of 530 external locus of control, mathematical Exner, John E., Jr., 428, 430– 392–393 extra-test behavior: procedures, frequently 431, 449 expectancy chart: Observations made by an employed as data Graphic representation of an examiner regarding what the reduction methods, expectancy table, 185, 187, examinee does and how the designed to identify 224 examinee reacts during the variables on which expectancy data: course of testing (e.g., how people may differ (or Information, usually in the testtaker copes with factors), 198–199, 256– the form of an expectancy frustration; how much 257, 282 table, illustrating the support the testtaker seems to correlations in, likelihood that an require; how anxious, 332–333 factor individual testtaker will fatigued, cooperative, or loadings in, 333 score within some distractible the testtaker is) purpose of, 332– interval of scores on a that are indirectly related to 333 two-factor, criterion measure, 185– the test’s specifi c content 283–284 types of, 189 but of possible signifi cance 198, 283, 333– in utility analysis, 216, 224 to 335 expectancy table: factor loading: In factor Information presented in analysis, a metaphor tabular form illustrating I-10 suggesting that a test (or the likelihood that an an individual test item) individual testtaker will interpretations regarding carries with it or “loads” score within some the testtaker’s on a certain amount of interval of scores on a performance, 318 one or more abilities that, criterion measure, 185– extrinsic motivation: A state in turn, have a 188 in which the primary determining infl uence on experimental psychology, force driving an the test score (or on the 37–38, 67 expert panel: In individual comes from response to the individual the test development process, external sources (such as test item), 198, 333 a group of people a salary or bonus) and fairness: As applied to tests, knowledgeable about the external constraints (such the extent to which a test subject matter being tested as job loss); contrast with is used in an impartial, and/or the population for intrinsic motivation, 576 just, and equitable way, whom the test was designed face validity: A judgment 106 who can provide input to regarding how well a group membership and, improve the test’s content, test or other tool of 205–207 item, 264 fairness, and other related measurement measures misunderstandings of, ways, 267 what it purports to 204 validity and, 199, expert witnesses, 59–61 measure that is based 203–207 exploratory factor analysis: solely on “appearances,” false negative: A specifi c A class of mathematical such as the content of type of miss procedures employed to the test’s items, characterized by a tool estimate factors, extract 174–176 facet: In of assessment indicating factors, or decide how many generalizability theory, that the testtaker does factors to retain, 1 98, 333– variables of interest in the not possess or exhibit a 334 universe including, for particular trait, ability, behavior, or attribute standardized tests to trait, or other attribute when in fact, the be administered in a being measured, testtaker does possess or prescribed fashion, 248–249 exhibit this trait, ability, such as the fl uency, 342 fl uid behavior, or attribute, HalsteadReitan intelligence: In Cattell’s 190, 569 Neuropsychological twofactor theory of false positive: An error in Battery; contrast with fl intelligence, nonverbal measurement exible battery, 538 – 539 abilities that are relatively characterized by a tool of fi xed cut score: Also known less dependent on culture assessment indicating as an absolute cut score, and formal instruction; that the testtaker a reference point in a contrast with crystallized possesses or exhibits a distribution of test scores intelligence, 285 – 287 particular trait, ability, used to divide a set of Flynn, James R., 299–300 behavior, or attribute data into two or more Flynn effect: “Intelligence when in fact the testtaker classifi cations that is infl ation”; the fact that does not, 190, 569 typically set with intelligence measured family environment, 302 reference to a judgment using a normed fatalism: The belief that what concerning a minimum instrument rises each year happens level of profi ciency after the test was normed, in life is largely out of a required to be included in usually in the absence of person’s control, 473 a particular classifi any academic dividend, Federal Rules of Evidence, cation; contrast with 299–300 60 fi eld dependent and relative cut score, 226 focal lesion, 514 focus independent people, 26 fi xed reference group group: Qualitative research fi eld-of-search item: A type scoring system: A system conducted with a group of of of scoring wherein the respondents who typically test item used in ability distribution of scores have been screened to and neurodiagnostic tests obtained on the test from qualify for participation in wherein the testtaker’s one group of testtakers the research, task is to locate a match (the fi xed reference 587–588 foils, 245 to a visually presented group) is used as the basis forced distribution stimulus, for the calculation of test technique: A procedure 528–529 fi gure drawing scores for future entailing the distribution of test: A general reference to a administrations; the SAT a predetermined number or type of test in which the and the percentage of assessees into testtaker’s task is to draw a GRE are scored this way, various categories that human fi gure and/or other fi 121–122 describe performance (such gures, and inferences are then fl exibility, 342 fl exible as categories ranging from made about the testtaker’s battery: Best associated with “unsatisfactory” to ability, personality, and/or neuropsychological “superior”), 572 forced- neurological intactness on the assessment, a group of tests choice format: A type of item basis of the fi gure(s) hand-picked by the assessor sometimes used in produced, 444–448, 504 to provide an answer to the personality tests wherein fi ndings, right to be referral question; contrast each of two or more choices informed of, 67–68 with fi xed battery, 538 – has been predetermined to be fi rst moments of 539 equal in social desirability, distribution, 128 fi t fl oor, 317 fl oor effect: A 396 statistics, 335 phenomenon arising from forensic psychological fi xed battery: A the diminished utility of a assessment: The theory prepackaged test tool of assessment in and application of battery containing a distinguishing testtakers at psychological evaluation number of the low end of the ability, and management in a his or her thoughts as they Gas Chromatography/Mass legal context, 490 occur, Spectrometry (GCMS) of competence to stand 441n5 frequency Test, 569 trial, 492, distributions: A tabular GATB. See General 494–495 of criminal listing of scores along Aptitude Test Battery responsibility, 495–496 with the number of times GCMS Test. See Gas of dangerousness to each score occurred, 78 Chromatography/ Mass oneself or others, 491– graphs of, Spectrometry Test GCR. See 494 80, 82, 83 group conformity rating of emotional injury, 497– grouped, 79 gender 498 general clinical shapes of, intelligence testing and, practice v., 490 – 491 80, 82 301–302 societal standards profi ling, 498 of simple, 78 of, 51 readiness for parole or frequency polygon: A General Aptitude Test probation, graphic illustration of Battery (GATB) controversy 496–497 formal data wherein numbers over, 551, 555 introduction evaluation: A indicating frequency are of, 550 validity typically set on the vertical axis, generalization and, 552–554 systematic, “on-the- test scores or categories General Electric Co. v. record” assessment are set on the horizontal Joiner, 61 generalizability leading to a diagnosis, axis, and the data are study: In the context of opinion, or described by a generalizability theory, recommendation for continuous line research conducted to intervention, or other connecting the points explore the impact of course of action that is where the test scores or different facets of the conducted by a qualifi ed categories meet universe on a test score, 158 person in an unoffi cial frequencies, 80–81 generalizability theory: Also context and subject to frequency recording, referred to as domain ethical and other 455 Freud, Sigmund, sampling theory, a system professional standards; 37n1, 49, 64 of assumptions about contrast with informal Frye v. United States, 60 – measurement that evaluation, 347 61 FSIQ. See Full Scale IQ includes the notion that a format: A general reference Full Scale IQ (FSIQ), 167– test score (and even a to the form, plan, 168 functional analysis: In response to an individual structure, arrangement, or behavioral assessment, the item) consists of a layout of test items as process of identifying the relatively stable well as to related dependent and independent component that actually considerations such as variables with respect to a is what the test or time limits for test presenting problem, 460 individual item is administration, 5 designed to measure as frame of reference: In the g factor: In Spearman’s two- well as relatively unstable context of item format, factor theory of intelligence, components that aspects of the focus the general factor of collectively can be of the item such as the intelligence; also, the factor accounted for as error, time frame that is measured to greater or 157–158 (past, present, or future), lesser degrees by all tests of generosity error: Also 395, 397 Frank, Jerome, 413 intelligence; contrast with s referred to as leniency error, Franz Ferdinand, Archduke, factor and group factors, a less than accurate rating or 178, 180 free association: A 283 , 286–288, 301 Galton, evaluation by a rater due to Francis, 37, 127, 279–280, technique, most frequently that rater’s general tendency used in psychoanalysis, 291 to be lenient or insuffi ciently wherein the subject relates all Garruto, John, 286 critical; contrast with severity error, 202 , 387 Management Admission group-related test-score genogram: A graphic Test, 364 adjustment, 205–207 representation of themes and Graduate Record Grutter v. Bollinger, 58 – 59 behavioral patterns in Examination (GRE), Guantanamo Bay, successive generations of a 98, 359, 361–362 391–392 Guess Who? family that is used as a tool graph: A diagram or chart technique, 375 of evaluation and composed of lines, points, guessing, 263–264 intervention, 448 bars, or other symbols that Guidance Information Georgetown criteria for describe and illustrate data, System (GIS 3.0), 549 competency to stand trial, 80–81, 82, 83, 129–135 Guilford, J. P., 297, 379–380 492, 494 Guilford-Zimmerman geriatric settings, 22 Temperament Survey, Gesell, Arnold, 293–294 555 I-11 GF-Gc: Fluid-crystallized Guttman scale: Named for its intelligence as described GRE. See Graduate Record developer, a scale in the Cattell-Horn Examination group wherein items range model, Carroll’s three- conformity rating sequentially from weaker stratum theory, and other (GCR), to stronger expressions of models, 285–287 438–439 group the attitude or belief giftedness: Performance that diagnostic tests, 368 group being measured, is consistently remarkable factors: According to 242–243 in any positively valued Spearman, factors common area, 298, 374 to a group of activities Hall, C. S., 378–379 Hall, GIS 3.0. See Guidance indicating intelligence, such Stanley G., 546 halo effect: Information as linguistic, mechanical, or A type of rating error System giveaway item: A arithmetic abilities, 283 wherein the rater views the test item, usually near the group intelligence object of the rating with beginning of a test of ability tests in military, extreme favor and tends to or achievement, designed to 336–340 pros bestow ratings infl ated in a be relatively easy—usually and cons of, 341 positive direction; a set of for the purpose of building in schools, 340– circumstances resulting in a the testtaker’s confi dence or 341 rater’s tendency to be lessening test-related anxiety, grouped frequency positively disposed and 255n4 distribution: Also referred insuffi ciently critical, Goal Instability Scale, 560 to as class intervals, a 202–203, 387 Goddard, Henry H., 42– tabular summary of test Halstead, Ward C., 538 46, 278, 294 scores in which the test Halstead-Reitan Goldstein-Scheerer Tests of scores are grouped by Neuropsychological Abstract and Concrete intervals, 79 Battery: A widely used fi Thinking, 515–516 groupthink: Collective xed neuropsychological governmental credentialing, decisionmaking test battery based on the 22–23 GPA. See grade characterized more by a work of Ward Halstead point average grade norms: drive toward consensus and Ralph Reitan, 538, Norms specifi cally than critical analysis 540–541 designed as a reference in and evaluation, which hand grip test, the context of the grade of may lead to less 76–77 Hand the testtaker who achieved a reasoned and riskier Test, 397, 438 particular score; contrast decisions than those Hand-Tool Dexterity Test, with age norms, 119 – 120 that might have been 548 grade point average made by an individual (GPA), 184 grade-based making the same scale, 237 Graduate decision, 10 I-12 hard sign: In academic and applied assumes a pattern of behavior neuropsychological traditions, 41 antiquity to that is characteristic of other assessment, an indicator nineteenth century, people; (2) thoughts, of defi nite neurological 35–38 feelings, or behavior on the defi cit, such as an intelligence part of one person that abnormal refl ex testing, 39–40 resonates in some familiar response; contrast with twentieth century, way with the experiences of soft sign, 517 38–41 another person, 422 Hare, Robert D., 497 history taking, 519–521 identity: A set of cognitive Hathaway, Starke R., HIT. See Holtzman Inkblot and behavioral 406, 408, 410 health Technique hit rate: The characteristics by which care, 487–488 Health proportion of people who individuals defi ne Insurance Portability and are accurately identifi ed as themselves as members Accountability Act possessing or not of a particular group; (HIPAA), 69 health possessing a particular trait, one’s sense of self, 422 psychology: A specialty behavior, characteristic, or idiographic approach: An area of psychology that attribute based on test approach to assessment focuses on understanding scores, 189, 191 characterized by efforts to the role of psychological Holland, John, 382 learn about each individual’s variables in the onset, Holtzman Inkblot Technique unique constellation of course, treatment, and (HIT), personality traits, with no prevention of illness, 430n3 attempt to characterize each disease, and disability, 23 homogeneity, 147, person according to any health-related quality of life 153, 194–195 particular set of traits; (HRQOL), 165–166 Hopwood v. State of contrast with nomothetic Hereditary Genius ( Galton), Texas, 571 approach, 398 Immunoassay 291 heterogeneity, 147, 153 Horn Art Aptitude Inventory, Test, 569 imperial hierarchical model: A term 363 examinations, 36 implicit usually applied to a House-Tree-Person (HTP) attitude: A nonconscious, theoretical model organized test, 446–447 automatic association in into two or more layers, with HRQOL. See health-related memory that produces a each layer subsumed by or quality of life disposition to react in some incorporated in the preceding HTP test. See House-Tree- characteristic manner to a layer; for example, Carroll’s Person test Hutt, Max, particular stimulus, 583 three-stratum theory of 531–532 hypnotic Implicit Attitude Test (IAT), cognitive abilities is a interview: An interview 583 implicit memory: hierarchical model with g as conducted after a hypnotic Memory that is outside of the top layer followed by two state has been induced in conscious control and layers of cognitive abilities the interviewee, most accessible only by indirect and processes, 285 typically in an effort to measures, 536 HIPAA. See Health enhance concentration, implicit motive: A Insurance focus, imagery, and nonconscious infl Portability and recall, 475 uence on behavior, Accountability Act hired typically acquired on guns, 64 histogram: A graph IAT. See Implicit the basis of experience, with vertical lines drawn at Attitude Test ICC. See 437 the true limits of each test item characteristic curve impression management: score (or class interval), IDEA: Individuals with Attempting to forming a series of Disabilities manipulate others’ contiguous rectangles, 80–81 Education Act, 351–352 opinions and historical perspective identifi cation: (1) A process impressions through the by which an individual selective exposure of some information, child under 3 years of age processing; successive including false who needs early processing information, usually intervention service informed consent: coupled with the because of developmental Permission to proceed suppression of other delays or a diagnosed with a (typically) information; in physical or mental diagnostic, evaluative, or responding to self-report condition that has a high therapeutic service on measures of personality, probability of resulting in the basis of knowledge psychopathology, or developmental delay, 345– about the service and its achievement, impression 346 risks and potential benefi management may be inference: A logical result or ts, 67 synonymous with a inkblots. See also Rorschach attempts to deduction in a reasoning inkblots “fake good” or “fake process, in Color Inkblot bad,” 390 in-basket 124, 172 infl ation of Therapeutic Storytelling, technique: A measurement range: Also referred to as 448 Holtzman, 430n3 technique used to assess infl ation of variance, a personality assessment managerial ability and reference to a phenomenon with, 427–432 organizational skills that associated with reliability inquiry: A typical element of entails a timed simulation of estimates wherein the Rorschach test the way a manager or variance of either variable administration; following executive deals with an in- in a correlational analysis is the initial presentation of basket fi lled with infl ated by the sampling all ten cards, the assessor mail, memos, procedure used and so the asks specifi c questions announcements, and other resulting correlation coeffi designed, among other notices and directives, 564 cient tends to be higher; things, to determine what incidental sampling: Also contrast with restriction of about each card led to the referred to as convenience range, assessee’s perceptions, sampling, the process of 153 – 154 , 183 428 arbitrarily selecting some informal evaluation: A insanity: A legal term people to be part of a sample typically nonsystematic, denoting an inability to because they are readily relatively brief, and “off- tell right from wrong, a available, not because they the-record” assessment lack of control, or a state are most representative of the leading to the formation of of other mental population being studied, an opinion or attitude, incompetence or disorder 112, 116 conducted by any person in suffi cient to prevent that incremental validity: Used in any way for any reason, in person from standing conjunction with an unoffi cial context and trial, being judged guilty, predictive validity, an not subject to the same or entering into a contract index of the explanatory ethics or standards as or other legal power of additional evaluation by a professional; relationship, 495 predictors over and above contrast with formal instrumental values: Guiding the predictors already in evaluation, 21 , 348 principles in the use, 184–185 information function, 162– attainment of some indirect estimation, 243 164 information objective—for example, individual intelligence test, processing styles: A way honesty and ambition; 141–142, 335–336 of looking at intelligence contrast with terminal Individuals with Disabilities that focuses on how values, 419 Education information is processed integrative report: A form Act. See IDEA infant rather than what is of interpretive report of or toddler with a disability: processed, 283, 288–289. psychological According to IDEA, a See also simultaneous assessment, usually computer-generated, in 279, 292–297 observable, interactionism: The belief which data from 278 sensory abilities and, that heredity and behavioral, medical, 279–280 social outcomes environment interact to administrative, and/or of, 309 stability of, 295– infl uence the other sources are 297 two-factor theory of, development of one’s integrated; contrast with 283–284, mental capacity and scoring report and 286–288, 301 types of, abilities, 282, 295 interpretive report, 13 284–285 Wechsler on, intercept: In the equation for integrity test: A screening 40, 280–281, 286, 290, a regression line, Y a instrument designed to 291, 300, 319, 322, 324 bX, the letter a, predict who will and will intelligence testing. See which stands for a not be an honest also StanfordBinet constant indicating employee, Intelligence Scale; where the line crosses 556–557 intelligence: A Wechsler intelligence tests the vertical or Y -axis, multifaceted capacity that absolute zero point and, 133 manifests itself in different 76 age and, 289–291, intercept bias: A reference to ways across the life span 296–297 construct the intercept of a but in general includes the validity of, 297 cost- regression line exhibited abilities and capacities to effectiveness of, 110 by a test or measurement acquire and apply cultural issues of, 42–46, procedure that knowledge, to reason 69, 302–308 culture systematically effectively and logically, to loading in, 303–306 underpredicts or exhibit sound judgment, to culture-fair, 304, 306–307 overpredicts the be perceptive, intuitive, developers of, 310 performance of members mentally alert, and able to fi examiner’s role in, 343 of a group; contrast with nd the right words and factors infl uencing, 299– slope bias, 200 thoughts with facility, and 308 family environment to be able to cope with and and, 302 Flynn effect in, adjust to new situations and 299–300 gender and, 301– new types of problems, 277 302 general principles of, I-13 ability clusters in, 292 age- 484 group, 336–341 interest inventories, 376– related decline in, 296 historical perspective of, 377, 545–548 inter-item APA on, 308 of children, 39–40 individual, 141– consistency: The 289–291, 296–297, 297n2 142, 335–336 of infants, consistency or complexity of, 280 349 IQ and, 98–99, homogeneity of the items controversy over, 308–309 119n3, 167–168 in of a test, estimated by crystallized, 285–287 neuropsychological techniques such as the emotional, 284 expert assessment, split-half method, 147, views of, 278–283 factor- 524–525 normal 256–257 analytic theories of, 282– curve and, 94–96 internal consistency estimate 288 fl uid, 285–287 of personality and, 299– of reliability: An estimate gifted, 296–299 300 profi le analysis of the reliability of a test information-processing and, 382n1 purpose obtained from a measure view of, 283, of, 291 specifi c of inter-item consistency, 288–289 abilities measured 145–150, 153 coeffi interpersonal and social by, cient alpha and, 149–150 aspects of, 279 341–343 in item-reliability index intrapersonal, 284 lay standard battery, and, 256–257 KR-20 public views of, 278–279 481–482 tasks used and, 148–149 split-half motivation and, 278 in, 289–291 theory reliability and, 145–147 multiple-factor models of, in, 291–292 internal locus of control, 284 nature v. nurture and, 392–393 interpersonal intelligence: In Gardner’s to every other and there work; contrast with theory of multiple is no absolute zero point extrinsic motivation, 576 intelligences, the ability to (which precludes involuntary hospitalization, understand other people, mathematical operations 214 ipsative scoring: An what motivates them, how on such data), 7 5–76 approach to test scoring and they work, and how to work interview: A tool of interpretation wherein the cooperatively with them; assessment in which testtaker’s responses and the contrast with intrapersonal information is gathered presumed strength of a intelligence, 284 through direct, reciprocal measured trait are interpreted Interpersonal Support communication, 8 relative to the measured Evaluations in clinical/counseling strength of other traits for List, 560 interpretive assessment, that testtaker; contrast with report: A formal or offi cial 473–479 criterion- class scoring and cumulative computer-generated account related validity of, 479 scoring, 253–254 of test performance presented cultural aspects of, IQ (intelligence quotient): A in both numeric and narrative 486–487 widely used, shorthand form and including an reference to intelligence explanation of the fi ndings; that echoes back from the three varieties of days now long gone when interpretive report are I-14 a testtaker’s mental age descriptive, screening, and in employment as determined by a test consultative; contrast with assessment, 563 in was divided by scoring report and neuropsychological chronological age and integrative report, 13 assessment, multiplied by 100 to interquartile range: An 521–522 in determine the ordinal statistic of psychological “intelligence quotient,” variability equal to the assessment, 7–9 98–99, 119n3, 167–168, difference between the psychometric aspects 313. See also third and fi rst quartile of, 478–479 standard intelligence points in a distribution questions in, 476 styles adoption and, 294 that has been divided into of, 9 types of, 8, 474– deviation, 313 quartiles, 88 478 ratio, 313 inter-scorer reliability: Also intrapersonal intelligence: In Wechsler tests for, referred to as inter-rater Gardner’s theory of 280–281 reliability, observer multiple intelligences, a IRT. See item response reliability, judge capacity to form accurate theory Ishihara test, 530 reliability, and scorer self-perceptions, to item analysis: A general reliability, an estimate of discriminate accurately term to describe various the degree of agreement between emotions, and to procedures, usually or consistency between be able to draw upon statistical, designed to two or more scorers (or one’s emotions as a explore how individual test judges or raters or means of understanding items work as compared to observers), 150–151, and an effective guide; other items in the test and in 153, 156 contrast with the context of the whole test interval recording, interpersonal (e.g., to explore the level of 455 interval scale: A intelligence, 284 diffi culty of individual system of intrinsic motivation: A state items on an achievement measurement in which all in which the primary test or the reliability of a things measured can be force driving an personality test); contrast rank-ordered into equal individual comes from with qualitative item intervals, where every within, such as personal analysis, 233 unit on the scale is equal satisfaction with one’s fairness in, 264 require testtakers to select a item-diffi culty index: In guessing in, 263– response from existing achievement or ability 264 item alternative responses or to testing and other contexts characteristic curves construct a response, 244– in which responses are in, 245, keyed correct, a statistic 260–263, 264 249, 396 item pool: The indicating how many item-diffi culty index in, reservoir or well from testtakers responded 255–256 item- which items will or will not correctly to an item; in discrimination index in, be drawn for the fi nal contexts where the nature 258–260 item- version of the test; the of the test is such that endorsement index in, collection of items to be responses are not keyed 256 item-reliability further evaluated for correct, this same statistic index in, 256–257 item- possible selection for use in may be referred to as an validity index in, 257– an item bank, item-endorsement index, 258 procedures, 195 244, 268 item 255 – 256 qualitative, 265–267 response curve. See item-discrimination index: speed tests and, 264– item characteristic A statistic designed to 265 in test development, curve indicate how adequately 233, 255–267 item response theory (IRT): a test item discriminates item bank: A collection of Also referred to as between high and low questions to be used in latent-trait theory or the scorers, 258–260 the construction of tests, latent-trait model, a item-endorsement index: In 248, 250–252, 274–275 system of assumptions personality assessment item branching: In about measurement and other contexts in computerized adaptive (including the assumption which the nature of the testing, the individualized that a trait being test is such that presentation of test items measured by a test is responses are not keyed drawn from an item bank unidimensional) and the correct or incorrect, a based on the testtaker’s extent to which each test statistic indicating how previous responses, 252– item measures the trait, many testtakers 253 158 responded to an item in item characteristic curve assumptions in using, a particular direction; in (ICC): A graphic 161 cut score setting achievement tests, which representation of the and, 230–231 HRQOL have responses that are probabilistic relationship and, 165–166 in keyed correct, this between a person’s level practice, 162–164 statistic is referred to as on a trait (or ability or reliability and, 158–160 an item-diffi culty index, other characteristic being TAT data and, 468 in 256 measured) and the test development, 260, item-mapping method: An probability for 273–275 IRTbased method of responding to an item in a item sampling: Also referred setting cut scores that predicted way; also to as content sampling, entails a histographic known as a category the variety of the subject representation of test response curve, an item matter contained in the items and expert response curve, or an items; frequently referred judgments regarding item trace line, to in the context of the item effectiveness, 231 162 , 260–263, 264 item variation between item-reliability index: A format: A reference to the individual test items in a statistic designed to form, plan, structure, test or between test items provide an indication of a arrangement, or layout of in two or more tests, 140 test’s internal individual test items, item trace line. See item consistency; the higher including whether the items characteristic curve the item-reliability index, the greater the test’s The Kallikak Family at) of the center of a internal consistency, 256– (Goddard), 45, 294 distribution, 92 257 Kaufman Assessment item-validity index: A latent-trait theory: Also Battery for statistic indicating the referred to as latent-trait Children (K-ABC), 288, degree to which a test model, a system of 368–371 KDS. See Kinetic measures what it assumptions about Drawing System measurement, including the purports to measure; the Kent-Rosanoff Free higher the itemvalidity assumption that a trait being Association Test, measured by a test is index, the greater the 441–442 test’s criterion-related unidimensional, and the KeyMath Revised test, 367– extent to which each test validity, 368 257– item measures the trait, 158 KFD. See Kinetic Family Laurent, Jeff, 72 law 258 items Drawing for computer enforcement agencies, 493 Kinetic Drawing System Law School Admission Test administration, 248–249, (KDS), 447 252–253 (LSAT), Kinetic Family Drawing 58, 364 DIF, 274 ”good,” 254– (KFD), 447 Kinetic School 255 in personality laws: Rules that individuals Drawing (KSD), 447 known must obey because they assessment, 393–396 groups method: Also referred scoring of, 253–254 are deemed to be good for to as the method of society as a whole; writing of, 244–253 contrasting groups, a system contrast with ethics, 5 3 Jackson Vocational Interest of collecting data on a –45, Survey, 549 predictor of interest from 56–59, 345 Jaffee v. groups known to possess Lawshe, C. H., 177–178 Redmond, 69 (and Lazarus, Arnold, 588 Jeffery, Diana D., not to possess) a trait, leaderless group technique: 49, 50 job attribute, or ability of A situational assessment applicant pool, interest, 196–197, 229– procedure wherein an 225 job 230 observer/assessor evaluates complexity, 225 KOIS. See Kuder the performance of assessees job satisfaction: A Occupational Interest in a group situation with pleasurable or positive Survey regard to variables such as emotional state resulting KR-20. See Kuder- leadership, initiative, and from the appraisal of Richardson formulas cooperation, 461, 564 one’s job or job KSD. See Kinetic School Leadership Q-Test, 395 experience, 577–578 Drawing learning disability: A job-related performance Kuder, G. Frederic, 148 disorder involving a sample, 563 Johnson, Kuder Occupational Interest discrepancy between ability Wendy, 295 Survey (KOIS), 549 and achievement, which may Joint Committee of Testing Kuder-Richardson formulas: manifest itself in attentional, Practices, 62 journal articles, A series of equations emotional, perceptual, and/or 31–32, 33 J-shaped curve, 82 developed by G. F. Kuder motor defi cits and/or in Julius, Steve, 136 and M. W. Richardson problems related to doing Jung, Carl, 382, 441, 557 designed to estimate the mathematical calculations, inter-item consistency of reading, writing, spelling, or K-ABC. See Kaufman tests, 148–149, 154 Kumho using or understanding Assessment Battery for Tire Company Ltd. v. spoken or written language; Children Kaiser, Robert Carmichael, 61 kurtosis: An not applicable to persons B., 573 indication of the nature of the who have academic problems steepness (peaked versus fl that are cultural or economic in origin or to persons who relationship to the the test was originally have learning problems original score and (b) the validated, 173 arising primarily from visual, magnitude of the locator test: A pretest or hearing, or motor handicaps routing test, usually for or mental retardation, 351, determining the most 353 appropriate level of test, I-15 Learning Potential 352 Assessment Device linear transformation: locus of control: The self- (LPAD), 364 least (continued) difference perceived stigmatizing label, between the new score source of what happens 69–70 legal issues and other scores on the to oneself, expert witnesses, 59–61 scale parallels the 392 general principles of, 484 magnitude of LPAD. See Learning laws, 53–54, 56–59 differences between the Potential litigation, 56–57, 59–61 original score and the Assessment Device preschool assessment and, other scores on the scales from which it LSAT. See Law School 345 public opinion and, 54– Admission Test lumbar 56 Leisure Satisfaction was derived; contrast puncture: A diagnostic Scale, 560 leniency error: with nonlinear transformation, 98 – 99 procedure typically Also referred to as a performed by a neurologist generosity error, a rating linguistic barriers, 48 in which spinal fl uid is error that occurs as the result Lipinski, Tara, 296 extracted from the spinal of a rater’s tendency to be literature reviews, 589– column by means of an too forgiving and insuffi 590 litigation, signifi inserted needle; also ciently critical, 202, 387 cant, 56–57, 59–61 referred to as a spinal tap, leptokurtic: A description of LNNB. See Luria-Nebraska 543 the kurtosis of a Neuropsychological Luria-Nebraska distribution that is Battery local norms: Neuropsychological relatively peaked in its Normative information Battery (LNNB), 540 center, 92 about some limited lesion: A pathological population, frequently of MacAndrew Alcoholism alteration of specifi c interest to the test Scale tissue as might result user, 121 (MAC-R), 489 from injury or infection, local processing: On-site, Machover, Karen, 445–446 514 computerized MAC-R. See MacAndrew letter of application, scoring, interpretation, or Alcoholism 561 licensing, 236 other conversion of raw Scale mail surveys, Life Satisfaction test data; contrast with 585 maintained abilities: Index A, 560 central processing and In the CattellHorn model Likert scale: Named for its teleprocessing, 13 of intelligence, cognitive developer, a summative local validation study: The abilities that do not rating scale with fi ve process of gathering decline with age and tend alternative responses ranging evidence, relevant to how to return to pre-injury on a continuum from, for well a test measures what levels after brain damage; example, “strongly agree” to it purports to measure, for contrast with vulnerable “strongly disagree,” 240–241 the purpose of evaluating abilities, 285 Lindzey, G., 378–379 linear the validity of a test or malingering, 474, 477 transformation: In other measurement tool; psychometrics, a process typically undertaken in of changing a score such conjunction with a population different from I-16 that (a) the new score has a direct numerical the population for whom mall intercept studies, 584 derived by calculating an mechanical prediction: The managed care: A health average of all scores in a application care system wherein the distribution, 0, 84, 8 86 of computer algorithms products and services measure of central tendency: together with statistical provided to patients by a One of three statistics rules and probabilities to participating network of indicating the average or generate fi ndings and health care providers are middlemost score recommendations; mediated by an between the extreme contrast administrative agency of scores in a distribution; with clinical prediction the insurer that works to the mean is a measure of and actuarial prediction, keep costs down by fi xing central tendency and a schedules of reimbursement statistic at the ratio level 508 – 510 to providers, of measurement, the median: A measure of central median is a measure of tendency derived by 487–488 central tendency that identifying the Management Progress Study takes into account the middlemost score in a (MPS), order of scores and is distribution, 567–568 ordinal in nature, and the 84–85 Marital Interaction Coding mode is a measure of Medical and Psychiatric System, 459 central tendency that is Inventory. See Marital Satisfaction Scale nominal in nature, 80–83 Minnesota Multiphasic (MSS), 195, 196–198 arithmetic mean, Personality Marlow-Crowne Social 80, 84, 86 median, Inventory (MMPI) Desirability Scale, 197 84–85 mode, 85– Medical College Admission Maslach Burnout Inventory 87 Test (MBI), 577 measure of variability: A (MCAT), 363–364 Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, medical diagnostic aids, 575–576 MAT. See Miller statistic indicating how scores in a distribution 542–543 Meehl, Paul, Analogies Test matching are scattered or dispersed; 410 Meier Art item, 245–246, 249 math range, standard deviation, Judgment Test, 27 tests, 367–368 mazes, 527 and variance are common memory MBI. See Maslach Burnout Inventory MBTI. See measures of variability, model of, 87 535 tests Myers-Briggs Type Indicator average deviation, 88–89 of, 534–538 MCAT. See Medical College interquartile and semi- types of, Admission Test interquartile 534–536 McGrew, Kevin, S., 287 ranges, 88 mental age: An index, now McGrew-Flanagan CHC range, 87 standard seldom used, that refers model, to the chronological age 287–288 deviation, 89–91 measurement: Assigning equivalent of one’s McKinley, John Charnley, performance on a test or 406, 408, 410 numbers or symbols to characteristics of people subtest; derived by MCMI-III. See Million reference to norms or objects according to Clinical Multiaxial indicating the age at Inventory-III rules, 72 equivalence, across which most testtakers can MCT. See Minnesota pass or meet some testtaker Clerical Test performance criterion populations, 273–274 MDBS-R. See Morally with respect to individual Debatable error in, 73 inference from, or groups of items, 1 19, Behaviors Scale- 290 Revised mean: Also called 136–138 rules of, 72 scales of, Mental Measurements the arithmetic mean, a Yearbook (Buros), measure of central tendency 72–77 31, 33 Miller Analogies Test behavior, characteristic, or mental status examination: (MAT), 362–363 attribute; a “miss” in this A specialized interview and Million Clinical Multiaxial context is an inaccurate observation used to screen InventoryIII (MCMI-III), classifi cation or prediction; for intellectual, emotional, 480 may be subdivided into false and neurological defi cits by Mills v. Board of Education positives and false negatives, touching on areas such as of District of Columbia, 59 190 the interviewee’s Milner, Joel, 192 Mini- MMPI. See Minnesota appearance, behavior, Mental State Exam, 522 Multiphasic Personality memory, affect, mood, minimum competency Inventory judgment, personality, testing program: Formal M’Naghten standard: Also thought content, thought evaluation program in basic known as the “right or processes, and state of skills such as reading, wrong” test consciousness, 476–477, writing, and arithmetic of insanity, a (since 522 Merrill, Maude, 311 designed to aid in replaced) standard that mesokurtic: A description of educational decision making hinged on whether an the kurtosis of a distribution that ranges from remediation individual knew right that is neither extremely to graduation, from wrong at the time of peaked nor fl at in its center, 57, 355–356 commission of a crime; 92 Minnesota Clerical Test contrast with the meta-analysis: A family of (MCT), 564 Durham standard and the techniques used to Minnesota Multiphasic ALI standard, 496 statistically combine Personality mode: A measure of central information across Inventory (MMPI), 393 tendency derived by studies to produce single for adolescents (MMPI- identifying the most estimates of the statistics A), 416–417 clinical frequently occurring being studied, 137 scales in, 406–407, 411, score in a distribution, method of contrasted groups. 413–415, 417 content 85–87 See known groups scales in, 409 criterion Montreal Neurological method groups and, 406–412 Institute Battery, 540 method of paired restructured form of Morally Debatable Behaviors comparisons: Scaling (MMPI-2-RF), ScaleRevised (MDBS-R), method whereby one of a 412–418, 489 revised 239–242 Morgan, Christiana pair of stimuli (such as (MMPI-2), 410–412, D., 41, 432, 434 motivation, photos) is selected 417–418, 482 Rorschach employment assessment and, according to a rule (such test v., 432 574–577 as “select the one that is supplementary scales in, motivation research methods: more appealing”), 241– 409, 417 T scores in, 97, Tools and procedures 242 412 validity scales in, (e.g., in-depth interviews method of predictive yield: A 408, 417 and focus groups), technique for identifying Minnesota Teacher Attitude typically qualitative, cut scores based on the Survey, 582 associated with consumer number of positions to be Minnesota Vocational research to explore fi lled, 231 Interest consumer attitudes, Metropolitan Readiness Inventory, 548 minority behavior, and motivation, Tests (MRTs), cultures, 47, 205–207, 302– 586–591 359–361 military 308 miss rate: The proportion motor defi cits, 514–515 settings, 22, 26, 336–340, of people a test or other motor test: A general 384 measurement procedure fails reference to a type of leadership and, 395, 462 to identify accurately with instrument or evaluation terrorism and, 391–392 respect to the possession or procedure used to obtain exhibition of a trait, information about one’s ability to move one’s limbs, evidence by means of a nature-nurture question, 42– eyes, or other parts of the table of correlations 43, 46, 279 controversy body (psychomotor ability) between traits and over, 295 intelligence and, as opposed to abilities that methods, 198 279, 292–297 are more strictly cognitive, Murray, Henry A., 41, 432, interactionism and, 295 behavioral, or sensory in 434–435, predeterminism and, 293– nature, 443, 567 muscle 294 preformationism and, 530–533 coordination, 523 292–293 VPR model and, MPS. See Management Myers, Isabel Briggs, 295 Progress Study 557–558 Naylor-Shine tables: MRTs. See Metropolitan Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Statistical tables once Readiness Tests MSS. See (MBTI), 382, 557–558 widely used to assist in Marital Satisfaction Scale judging the utility of a multidimensional scale, 237, narrow-band measures, 459 particular test, 188, 224 241 Multilingual Aphasia NASA. See National NCCEA. See Neurosensory Examination, 534 multiple Aeronautics and Space Center cut scores: The use of two or Administration Comprehensive more cut scores with NASP. See National Examination of reference to one predictor for Association of School Aphasia need: According the purpose of categorizing Psychologists to personality theorist Henry testtakers into more than two National Aeronautics and Murray, determinants of groups, or the use of a Space behavior arising from within different cut score for each Administration (NASA), the individual; contrast with predictor when using 566 national anchor norms: the multiple predictors for An Murrayan concept of selection, 226 multiple equivalency table for press, 435 negative skew, 82, hurdles: A multistage scores on two nationally 90, 91 neglect: Failure on the decision-making process in standardized tests part of an adult responsible which the achievement of a designed to measure the for the care of another to particular cut score on one same thing, 120–121 exercise a minimum degree test is necessary in order to National Association of of care in providing food, advance to the next stage of School Psychologists clothing, shelter, education, evaluation in the selection (NASP), 24 medical care, and process, 226–228 National Defense Education supervision; contrast with multiple regression: The Act, 55 abuse, 502 – 505 analysis of relationships National Education NEO PI-R. See Revised between more than one Association (NEA), NEO independent variable and 61–62 national norms: Personality Inventory one dependent variable to Norms derived from a understand how each standardization sample that independent variable was nationally representative predicts the dependent of the population, 120 I-17 variable, 135 naturalistic observation: nervous system, behavior multiple-choice format, 245, Behavioral observation and, 512–517 249 multiple-factor that takes place in a neurodevelopment training intelligence models, 284 naturally occurring ball, 27 neurological multitrait-multimethod setting (as opposed to a damage: Impairment, injury, matrix: A method of research laboratory) for harm, or loss of function of evaluating construct validity the purpose of any part or process of the by simultaneously evaluation and central or peripheral nervous examining both information-gathering, systems, convergent and divergent 380 513–517 neurology: A various possible defi noneconomic benefi ts (in the branch of medicine that ciencies in brain-behavior context of utility), 213– focuses on the nervous functioning, 522 214 system and its disorders; neuropsychology: A branch noneconomic costs (in the contrast with of psychology that context of utility), 211 neuropsychology, 512 focuses on the noninvasive procedures: A neuron: Nerve cell, 512 relationship between method of evaluation or neuropsychological brain functioning and treatment that does not assessment: The evaluation behavior; contrast with involve intrusion (by of brain and nervous system neurology, 512 surgical procedure, X- functioning as it relates to Neurosensory Center ray, or other means) into behavior, 512 Comprehensive the body; for example, in content and nature of, 517– Examination of Aphasia a neuropsychological 519 executive function (NCCEA), evaluation, observation of tests in, 526–530 general 540 the client walking or intelligence and ability neurotology: A branch of skipping, 522 tests medicine that focuses on nonlinear transformation: In in, 524–525 problems relating to psychometrics, a process general principles of, 484 hearing, balance, and of changing a score such history taking, case history, facial nerves, 512 that (a) the new score and case noir acronym, 73–74 does not necessarily have studies in, 519–521 nominal scale: A system of a direct numerical interview in, 521–522 measurement in which all relationship to the medical diagnostic aids things measured are classifi original score and (b) the and, 542–543 memory tests ed or categorized based on magnitude of the in, 534–538 mental status one or more distinguishing differences between the examination in, 522 characteristics and placed new score and the other nervous system, behavior into mutually exclusive and scores on the scale may and, exhaustive categories, 74, 76 not parallel the 512–517 magnitude of differences neuropsychological tests between the original in, 524 perceptual, motor, score and the other scores and perceptualmotor I-18 on the scales from which function tests in, 530– nominating technique: A the original score was 533 method of peer appraisal derived; contrast with physical examination in, in which members of a linear transformation, 99 522–524 purpose of, 519 class, team, work unit, nonverbal communication, signs in, 517 of special or other type of group 48–49 norm: (1) Behavior or populations, 543–544 test are asked to select (or performance that is usual, of ability to abstract in, nominate) people in average, normal, standard, 525–526 test batteries response to a question or expected, or typical; (2) and, 481–482, 538–543 statement, 299, 375–376 singular form of norms, 108, verbal functioning tests nomothetic approach: An 111. in, 533–534 approach to assessment See also norms normal Neuropsychological characterized by efforts to control group, 406–407 Impairment Scale, learn how a limited normal curve: A bell-shaped, 521 number of personality smooth, mathematically defi neuropsychological traits can be applied to all ned curve highest at the mental status examination: people; contrast with center and gradually tapered A general clinical idiographic approach, on both sides, approaching evaluation designed to 398 but never actually touching sample and check for the horizontal axis, 80, 82 area under, 93, 95–96 referenced testing and Dignity Act odd- psychological tests and, assessment, 111 , 122– even reliability: An 94–96 124, 235–236 estimate normalized standard score norms: The test performance of split-half reliability of scale: data of a group of a test, obtained by Conceptually, the end testtakers, designed as a assigning oddnumbered product of “stretching” a reference for evaluating, items to one-half of the skewed distribution into interpreting, or otherwise test and even-numbered the shape of a normal placing in context items to the other half, curve, usually through individual test scores; 145, 147 nonlinear transformation, also referred to as Offi ce of Strategic Services 99–100 normative data, 108–109, (OSS), normalizing a distribution: A 111–112. See also 337, 394, 462 statistical correction norming; norm- Offi cer Qualifying Test, 337 applied to distributions referenced testing and Olley, Rivka, 343 meeting certain criteria assessment On the Origin of Species by for the purpose of age, 118–119 Means of approximating a normal developmental, 120 Natural Selection distribution, thus making fi xed reference (Darwin), 36 online the data more readily group scoring databases, 32, 33 online comprehensible or systems and, 121–122 surveys, 584–585 online manipulable, 99 grade, 119–120 testing, 66 optional subtest. normative sample: Also sampling to develop, See supplemental subtest referred to as a norm 112–118 for Optometry Admission Test group, a group of people standardized test, (OAT), 364 ordinal scale: A presumed to be 117–118 types of, system of representative of the 118–122 user, 111 measurement in which all universe of people who things measured can be may take a particular test OAT. See Optometry Admission Test Object rank-ordered, where the and whose performance rank-ordering implies data on that test may be Sorting Test, 516, 526 objective personality test: nothing about exactly used as a reference source how much greater one or context for evaluating Typically a test consisting of short-answer items wherein ranking is than another individual test scores, and there is no absolute 111, 117 the assessee’s task is to select one response from the two or zero point on the scale; norming: The process of most scales in deriving or creating more provided and all scoring is done according to psychology and norms, 111 education are ordinal, set procedures involving norm-referenced cut score. 74–76 See relative little if any judgment on the part of the scorer, 424–425 Oregon’s Death with Dignity cut score Act observer bias, 466–467 norm-referenced testing and O’Connor Tweezer (ODDA), 64–65 assessment: A method Dexterity Test, organicity: An abbreviated of evaluation and a way 549–550 reference to organic brain of deriving meaning damage and to one of the OCQ. See Organizational from test scores by Commitment varieties of functional evaluating an individual consequences that attends Questionnaire testtaker’s score and such damage, 513–517 ODDA. See Oregon’s Death comparing it to scores of organizational commitment: with a group of testtakers on The strength of an the same test; contrast individual’s identifi with criterion- cation with and involvement in a School Ability Test, 340 parole, readiness for, 496– particular organization, outlier: (1) An extremely 497 PASAT. See Paced 578 atypical plot point in a Auditory Serial Addition Organizational Commitment scatterplot; (2) any Task Questionnaire (OCQ), extremely atypical fi nding PASS model: Information- 578 organizational in research, 132 processing model credentialing, 22–23 overt behavior: An developed by Luria; organizational culture: The observable action PASS stands for totality of socially or the product of an planning, attention, transmitted behavior patterns observable action, simultaneous, and characteristic of an including test- or successive, organization or company, assessment-related 288–289 pattern including the structure of the responses, 102 analysis: Study of the pattern organization and the roles of test scores on a Wechsler within it, the leadership style, Paced Auditory Serial or other test in order to the prevailing values, norms, Addition Task identify a pattern associated sanctions, and support (PASAT), 213 panel with a diagnosis (e.g., mechanisms as well as the interview: Also referred to neurological defi cit in the traditions and folklore, as a board interview, an right hemisphere), 525 methods of enculturation, interview conducted with Pavlo, Barbara C., 17 and characteristic ways of one interviewee by more PCAT. See Pharmacy interacting with people and than one interviewer at a College Admission Test institutions outside the time, 8 PCL. See Psychopathy culture (such as customers, parallel forms: Two or more Checklist suppliers, competition, versions or forms of the PCL-R. See Revised government agencies, and the same test where, for each Psychopathy Checklist general public), 578–581 form, the means and Pearson, Karl, 37, 126–127 orientation: A three-part variances of observed test scores are equal; contrast Pearson r: Also known as the element of the mental Pearson coeffi cient of status examination with alternate forms, 144 consisting of orientation – 145 product-moment to self (if the interviewee parallel processing. See correlation and the knows who he or she is), simultaneous processing Pearson place (where the parallel-forms reliability: An correlation coeffi cient, a interview is taking estimate of the extent to widely used statistic for place), and time (the date which item sampling and obtaining an index of the of the interview); other errors have affected relationship between two interviewees oriented to test scores on two variables when that person, place, and time versions of the same test relationship is linear and are said to be when, for each form of when the two correlated “oriented times 3,” the test, the means and variables are continuous 477 orienting response: variances of observed test (i.e., theoretically can Indicative of an infant’s scores are equal; contrast take any value), capacity for with alternate-forms 126–128, 150 peer responsiveness, the reliability, 144 – 145 appraisal: A method of action of turning in the PARC v. Commonwealth of obtaining evaluation-related direction of a stimulus; Pennsylvania, 59 information about an contrast with alerting Parent Attitude individual by polling that response, 290 Questionnaire, 347 individual’s friends, originality, 342 OSS. See Parenting Stress Index classmates, work colleagues, Offi ce of Strategic (PSI), 505 parents, or other peers, Services Otis-Lennon evaluation of, 500–501 375–376, 572 penile procedures used to and behavioral styles, and plethysmograph: An evaluate the integration or related characteristics, instrument, used in the coordination of sensory 299–300, 378–379, 382, assessment and treatment of and motor abilities, 530– 422 personality assessment: male sex offenders, designed 533 The to measure changes in penis performance assessment: An measurement and volume as a function of evaluation of evaluation of sexual arousal, 463 performance tasks psychological traits, PEP. See Profi ciency according to criteria states, values, interests, Examination developed by experts attitudes, worldview, Program from the domain of study acculturation, personal percentage correct: On a test tapped by those tasks, identity, sense of humor, with responses that are 373–375 cognitive and behavioral scored correct or performance task or test: (1) styles, and/or related incorrect, an expression In general, a work sample individual characteristics, of the number of items designed to elicit 379. See also behavioral answered correctly, representative assessment; multiplied by 100 and knowledge, skills, and Minnesota Multiphasic divided by the total values from a particular Personality number of items; domain of study; (2) in Inventory; projective contrast with percentile, employment settings, an method actuarial 118 instrument or procedure approach to, 467–468 percentile: An expression of Barnum effect in, 506, the percentage of people 508 biased judgments in, whose score on a test or 387–388 in career measure falls below a I-19 counseling, 555–558 particular raw score, or performance task or test: clinical approach to, 467– a converted score that (continued) that requires 468 context of, 388 refers to a percentage of the assessee to criterion groups in, 404– testtakers; contrast with demonstrate certain job- 418 cultural issues in, percentage correct, 118 related skills or abilities 389, 400, 418–422 data percentile norms: The raw under conditions identical reduction methods in, data from a test’s or analogous to 402–404 fi gure drawings standardization sample conditions on the job, 373 in, 444–448 frame of converted to percentile peripheral nervous system: reference in, 395, 397 form, 118 All of the nerve cells that general principles of, 484 percept: A perception of an convey neural messages to with inkblots, 427–432 image (typically used with and from the body except ipsative scoring of, 253– reference to the Rorschach those nerve cells of the brain 254 issues in Inkblot Test), 428 and spinal cord; contrast with development and use of, perceptual test: A general the central nervous system, 398–400 item formats reference to any of many 512 Personal Data Sheet, 40– in, 393–396 life instruments and procedures 41, 401, 408 personality: An outcomes infl uenced used to evaluate varied individual’s unique by, 465 location of, 391 aspects of sensory constellation of logic and reason in, 401 functioning, including psychological traits and objective, 424–425 aspects of sight, hearing, states, including aspects of origin of, 36 pictures in, smell, touch, taste, and values, interests, attitudes, 432–440 primary balance, 530–533 worldview, acculturation, content area sampled in, perceptual-motor test: A sense of personal identity, 389–390 procedures in, general reference to any sense of humor, cognitive 393–395 purpose of, 383– of many instruments and 385 referents in, 385–389 response styles in, 390–391 phallometric data, 463 organized into subtests sample questions from, 383 Pharmacy College by category of item; scope and theory of, 392– Admission Test contrast with age scale, 393 scoring and (PCAT), 364 314 interpretation of, 3 97–398 Piaget, Jean, 281–283 poll: A type of survey used sounds in, 443–444 in PIC. See Personality to record votes, usually standard battery, 481–482 Inventory for containing questions Children picture that can be answered absurdity item: A type of with a “yes-no” or “for- test item that presents the against” response, I-20 typically used to gauge testtaker with the task of testtakers of, 385–391 identifying what is wrong or opinion about issues, theory behind, 401–402 silly about a stimulus image, 584 validity scales in, 399– 528–530 polygraph: The instrument 400, 408, 417 words in, popularly known as a lie pictures, as projective 440–443 detector, 463–464 stimuli early uses Personality Inventory for of, 433 examples polytomous test item: A test Children of, 432, 439–440 item or question with three or (PIC), 387 personality TAT, 433–439 more alternative responses, profi le: A description, graph, where only one alternative is Piers-Harris Self-Concept or table representing the Scale, scored correct or scored as extent to which a person has being consistent with a 385–386 pilot work: demonstrated a particular targeted trait or other Also referred to as pilot pattern of traits and states, construct, 159 Porteus, study and pilot research, the 382 Stanley D., 527 portfolio: A preliminary research Personality Projection in surrounding the creation of a work sample; referred to as the Drawing of the prototype test; a general portfolio assessment when Human Figure objective of pilot work is to used as a tool in an (Machover), determine how best to evaluative or diagnostic 445–446 personality measure, gauge, assess, or process, 9–10, 373–375, 563 states, 102, 382–383 evaluate the targeted positive skew, 82, 90, 91 personality trait: Any construct(s), 236–237 PL 94- positron emission distinguishable, relatively 142. See Public Law 94-142 tomography scan. enduring way in which one placement: A disposition, See PET scan individual varies from transfer, or assignment to a power test: A test, another, 101–104, 379–381, group or category that may usually of 403, be made on the basis of one achievement or ability, 556–557 personality criterion, 560–561 with (1) either no time type: A constellation of platykurtic: A description of limit or such a long time traits and states that is the kurtosis of a limit that all testtakers similar in pattern to one distribution that is can attempt all items and identifi ed category of relatively fl at in its (2) some items so diffi personality within a center, 92 cult that no testtaker can taxonomy of personalities, plethysmograph: An obtain a perfect score; 381–382, 557–558 instrument that records contrast with speed test, PET (positron emission changes in the volume of 154 – 155 tomography) scan: A tool a part of the body arising predeterminism: The of nuclear medicine from variations in blood doctrine that one’s particularly useful in supply, 463 abilities are diagnosing biochemical PMAs. See primary mental predetermined by lesions in the brain, 5 42 abilities point scale: A test genetic inheritance and with items that no amount of learning or other changes, 196 primary (PEP), 354, 356 profi le: intervention can mental abilities (PMAs), A narrative description, enhance what is 310 Princip, Gavrilo, 178– graph, table, or other genetically coded to 180 privacy right: The representation of the extent unfold, freedom of people to choose to which a person has 293–294 the time, circumstances, and demonstrated certain targeted predictive validity: A extent to which they wish to characteristics as a result of form of share or withhold from the administration or criterion-related validity others personal beliefs, application of tools of that is an index of the opinions, and behavior; assessment; also (a verb) to degree to which a test contrast with profi le, 382 score predicts some confi dentiality, 68 profi le analysis: The criterion measure, 180, privileged information: Data interpretation of 182–183, 191–192 protected by law from patterns of scores on a preformationism: The disclosure in a legal test or test battery, doctrine that all living proceeding; typically, frequently used to organisms are preformed exceptions to privilege generate diagnostic at birth and that are also noted in law; hypotheses from intelligence, much like contrast with confi intelligence test data, other preformed dential information, 68 382n1 “structures,” cannot be probation, readiness for, profi ler: An occupation improved upon by 496–497 procedural associated with law environmental memory: Memory for how to enforcement; one who intervention, do certain things or perform creates psychological 292–293 premorbid certain functions; contrast profi les of crime functioning: One’s ability with declarative memory, suspects to help law level, personality, or other 534 – 535 enforcement personnel behavioral attributes prior process score: A score on a capture the profi led to the onset of illness or test designed to help the suspect, 382n1 disorder, and/ or prior to an test user understand the profi ling: Referred to by the injury-producing accident, way that the testtaker FBI as “criminal 470 processes information, investigative analysis,” a preschool assessment 326 crime-solving process ADHD and, 346, 348 processing strength, 369 that checklists for, 346, product-moment coeffi cient draws upon 348–349 laws of correlation. See Pearson r psychological and regarding, 345 productivity gain: A net criminological expertise psychological tests for, increase in work output, applied to the study of 349–350 rating scales which in utility analyses crime-scene evidence, for, 346–349 may be estimated through 498–499 prognostic test: specialized instruments the use of a particular test A tool of assessment used to for, 350 press: or other evaluative predict; sometimes According to procedure, synonymous with aptitude personality theorist 223–224 productivity: test, 358 Henry Murray, Output or value yielded program norms. See user determinants of relative to work effort, 571– norms progressive condition, behavior arising from 574 521 Project Head Start, 327 within the professional or occupational projective hypothesis: The environment; contrast entrance examinations, thesis that an individual with the 363–364 supplies structure to Murrayan concept of Profi ciency Examination unstructured stimuli in a need, 435 pretest-posttest Program manner consistent with the individual’s own unique Sigmund Freud, 49, 64 482–488 custody pattern of conscious and psychoeducational evaluation, 498, 500– unconscious needs, fears, assessment: Psychological 502 dynamic, 4, 363– desires, impulses, confl icts, evaluation in a school or 366 fairness in, 106 and ways of perceiving and other setting, usually forensic, 490–498 responding, 426 conducted to diagnose, general principles of, projective method: A remedy, or measure 484–485 intervention technique of personality academic or social progress and, 4 interviews in, 7– assessment in which or to otherwise enrich a 9 medical tools in, 14 some judgment of the student’s education, 287 norm-referenced v. assessee’s personality is psychoeducational test criterion- made on the basis of his battery: A packaged kit referenced, 122–124 or her performance on a containing tests that parties in, 15–20 by Pavlo, task that involves measure educational 17 of people with supplying structure to achievement and abilities disabilities, 25, 28–30 relatively unstructured or related to academic portfolio in, 9–10 process incomplete stimuli, 41, success, 343, 368 for of, 2–4 psychoeducational, 426–427. educational assessment, 287 psychophysiological, See also inkblots 368–373 K-ABC and, 462–464 quality of life in, assumptions of, 449– 368–371 22 reference sources for, 451 in custody WJ-III, 286, 371–373 30–33 role-play tests in, evaluation, 501 fi gure psychological assessment: 11–12 roots of, 1 settings drawings, 444–448, The gathering and integrating of, 20–24 social 504 Hand Test, 397, of psychological data for facilitation in, 16 testing 438 pictures as, 432– psychological evaluation, v., 2–3 tests in, 5–7 440 pros and cons of, through the use of tests, therapeutic, 4 third-party 448–449 psychometric interviews, case studies, observer in, 18 types of, 4 considerations in, behavioral observation, and video in, 14 451–452 specially designed psychological autopsy: A Rosenzweig Picture- apparatuses and reconstruction of a Frustration measurement procedures; deceased individual’s Study, 438–440 contrast with psychological psychological profi le on situational variables in, 451 testing, 1–4. See also the basis of archival sounds as, 443–444 words as, clinical/counseling records, artifacts, and 440–443 Proposition 209, assessment; educational interviews with the 571 protocol: (1) The form or assessment; assessee while living or sheet on which testtakers’ neuropsychological with people who knew responses are entered; (2) a assessment; personality the deceased, 19 method or procedure for assessment; preschool psychological report: An evaluation or scoring, 24, assessment archival document 24n2 assessor’s role in, 3–4, 29 describing fi ndings as a Proverbs Test, 525 assumptions about, 101– result of psychological PSI. See Parenting 107 behavioral testing or assessment, 505 Stress Index observation in, 10–11 in psychasthenia, 407n5 biopsychosocial psychiatric patients, assessment, 473 CAPA, 214 psychoanalysis: 13–14, 63, 66, 510 case I-21 A theory of history data in, 10 psychological report: personality and collaborative, 4 (continued) psychological treatment conducting of, 24–30 Barnum effect in, 506, originally developed by culturally informed, 137– 508 clinical v. 138, 389, mechanical prediction in, 508–510 of antiquated term selection of people to be part clinical/counseling psychometry ), 6 of a sample because they are assessment, psychometrist: A thought to be representative 505–510 professional in testing of the population being elements of, and assessment who studied, 112, 115 507–508 typically holds a master’s psychological test: A degree in psychology or Q-sort technique: An measuring device or education and is qualifi assessment technique in procedure designed to ed to administer specifi c which the task is to sort a measure psychology- tests; contrast with group of statements, related variables, 5 psychometrician, 6 usually in perceived rank choice of, 109 psychopath: A diagnosis that order ranging from “most normal curve describes individuals with descriptive” to “least and, 94–96 few inhibitions who may descriptive”; the psychological testing: The pursue pleasure or money statements, traditionally measuring of psychology- with callous disregard for the presented on index cards, related variables by welfare of others, 497 may be sorted in ways means of devices or Psychopathy Checklist that refl ect various procedures designed to (PCL), 497 perceptions, such as how obtain samples of psychophysiological respondents see assessment methods: themselves or would like behavior, 1–4. See also intelligence testing Techniques for monitoring to see themselves, 395 assessment v., 2–3 physiological changes known qualitative item analysis: A assumptions about, 101– to be infl uenced by general term for various 107 in psychological factors, such nonstatistical procedures clinical/counseling as heart rate and blood designed to explore how assessment, pressure, 462–464 individual test items PsycINFO: An online work, both compared to 480–482 fairness electronic database, other items in the test and in, 106 norm- maintained by the in the context of the referenced v. American whole test; in contrast to criterion- Psychological statistically based referenced, 122–124 Association and leased procedures, qualitative roots of, 1 methods involve psychologist-client to institutional users, designed to help exploration of the issues relationship, 68–69 by verbal means such as psychometrician: A individuals locate relevant documents interviews and group professional in testing and discussions conducted assessment who typically from psychology, education, nursing, with testtakers and other holds a doctoral degree in relevant parties, 265–267 psychology or education and social work, law, medicine, and other qualitative methods, 265 specializes in areas such as quality assurance, 271–273 individual differences, disciplines, 32 quality of life: in quantitative psychology, or psychological assessment, an theory of assessment; evaluation of variables such contrast with psychometrist, I-22 Public Law (PL) 94–142, as perceived stress, 6 loneliness, sources of psychometrics: The science 345 public opinion, legal considerations and, 54–56 satisfaction, personal values, of quality of living conditions, psychological public policy, cultural issues and, 53 Purdue Pegboard and quality of friendships measurement and other social support, 22 (synonymous with the Test, 530 purposive sampling: The arbitrary quantitative methods: Techniques of data generation and analysis judgment that places a can be performed that rely primarily on person or attribute along a meaningfully because a mathematical or continuum identifi ed by a true or absolute zero statistical rather than scale of numerical or word point exists; few scales in verbal procedures, 265 descriptors called a rating psychology or education quartile: One of three scale, 202 are ratio scales, 76–77 dividing points between rating error: A judgment that raw score: A straightforward, the four quarters of a results from the unmodifi ed accounting distribution, each intentional or of performance, usually typically labeled unintentional misuse of a numerical and typically Q1, Q2, or Q3, 88 quota rating scale; two types of used for evaluation or system: A selection rating error are leniency diagnosis, 78 procedure whereby a fi xed error (or generosity RCRAS. See Rogers number or percentage of error ) and severity Criminal applicants with certain error, 202 – 203 Responsibility characteristics or from rating scale: A system of Assessment Scale certain backgrounds are ordered numerical or reacculturation, 490 selected regardless of other verbal descriptors on reactivity: Changes in an factors such as documented which judgments about assessee’s behavior, thinking, ability, 58–59 the presence/absence or or performance that arise in magnitude of a particular response to being observed, race norming: The trait, attitude, emotion, or assessed, or evaluated, controversial practice of other variable are 460, 467 readiness test: norming on the basis of indicated by raters, A tool of assessment race or ethnic judges, examiners, or designed to evaluate whether background, 111, (when the rating scale refl an individual has the 551, 555 ects self-report) the requisites to begin a program racism, 294 range: A assessee, 202, 239 or perform a task; sometimes descriptive statistic of in behavioral observation, synonymous with variability derived by 457–559 for preschool aptitude test, 359 calculating the difference assessment, 346–349 reading rate, 195 between the highest and ratio IQ: An index of reading tests, 366–367, lowest scores in a intelligence derived from 368 Reading-Free distribution, 87 the ratio of the testtaker’s Vocational Interest rank-difference correlation mental age (as calculated Inventory (R-FVII), 549 coeffi cient. from a test) divided by reasonable boundaries, 172 See Spearman’s rho his or her chronological rectangular distribution, 82 rank-order correlation coeffi age and multiplied by 100 Reeve, Bryce B., 160, 165– cient. See to eliminate decimals, 166 reference volumes, 31, Spearman’s rho 313 33 refl ex: Involuntary motor ranking: The ordinal ratio scale: A system of response to a ordering of persons, scores, measurement in which all stimulus, 523 or variables into relative things measured can be regression: The analysis of positions or degrees of rank-ordered, the rank relationships among value, 202 Raphael, Alan, ordering does imply variables to understand 481 rapport: A working something about exactly how one variable may relationship between how much greater one predict another, 133 examiner and examinee in ranking is than another, correlation and, 133– testing or assessment, 24 equal intervals exist 135 multiple, 135 Rasch, Georg, 160 RAT. See between each number on Remote Associates Test regression coeffi cient: In the the scale, and all formula Y a bX, rating: A numerical or verbal mathematical operations the letter a (symbolizing the ordinate intercept) is a 153, 156 IRT and, 158– résumé, 561 retirement, 559– regression coeffi cient 160 odd-even, 145, 147 560 Retirement Satisfaction and so is the letter b parallel-forms, 144–145 Inventory, 560 return on (which is equal to the split-half, 145–148, 154 investment: A ratio of the slope of the line); in standard error of the economic and/or practice, the actual values difference and, noneconomic benefi ts of a and b are 168–170 standard error derived from expenditures to determined by simple of measurement and, initiate or improve a algebraic calculation, 133 160, 164, 166–168 and particular testing program, regression line: The result of test nature, 152–160 test- training program, or simple regression retest, 143–144, 153–154, intervention as compared to analysis; the graphic “line 431 utility infl uenced by, all of the costs of the of best fi t” that comes 209–210 Remote Associates initiative or improvements, closest to the greatest Test (RAT), 342 reliability 223 Revised NEO number of points on the coeffi cient: General term for Personality Inventory scatterplot of the two an index of reliability or the (NEO PI-R), 399, 403– variables, ratio of true score variance 405 133–134 on a test to the total variance, Revised Psychopathy Reik, Theodor, 467 139, 151–160 Checklist Reitan, Ralph M., 538 response style: A tendency (PCL-R), 497 Reitan-Indiana Aphasia to respond to a test item R-FVII. See Reading-Free Screening Test or interview question in Vocational Interest (AST), 534 relative cut some characteristic Inventory Richardson, M. score: Also referred to as a manner regardless of W., 148 risk assessment, norm-referenced cut score, a content; for example, an of child abuse and neglect, reference point in a acquiescent response 505 distribution of test scores style (a tendency to RNEE. See Entrance used to divide a set of data agree) and a socially Examination for Schools into two classifi cations desirable response style of Nursing based on norm-related (a tendency to present Rogers, Carl, 395 considerations rather than on oneself in a favorable or Rogers Criminal the relationship of test scores socially desirable way), Responsibility to a criterion, 225–226 390–391 Assessment Scale reliability: The extent to restriction of range: Also (RCRAS), 496 Rokeach which measurements are referred to as Value Survey, 75 role consistent or repeatable; restriction of variance, play: Acting an also, the extent to which a improvised or partially measurements differ from phenomenon associated improvised part in a occasion to occasion as a with reliability estimates simulated situation, 11, function of measurement wherein the variance of 462 error, 107–108, either variable in a role-play test: An assessment 109–110, 331 correlational analysis is tool wherein assessees are alternate-forms, 144– restricted by the sampling instructed to act as if they 145, 153–154 in procedure used and so were placed in a classrooms, 239 error the resulting correlation particular situation, 11– and, 139–143, 152–153 coeffi cient tends to be 12, 489 estimates of, 143–151 lower; contrast with infl Rorschach, Hermann, 41, generalizability theory ation of range, 427 and, 157–158 internal 132 – 133 , 153–154, Rorschach inkblots, 397 consistency estimate of, 183 restriction of variance. administration, scoring, and 145–150, 153, 256–257 See restriction interpretation of, 428– inter-scorer, 150–151, of range 430 assumptions of, SB5. See Stanford-Binet test development that 450 Intelligence entails a graphic mapping development of, Scale scale: (1) A system of a testtaker’s responses, 427 inkblots in, of ordered numerical or 242 428–429 MMPI verbal descriptors, usually scatter diagram. See v., 432 systems occurring at fi xed intervals, bivariate of, 430 testing used as a reference standard distribution the limits in, 429 in measurement; (2) a set of scattergram. See bivariate value of, 481 numbers or other symbols distribution scatterplot: Also Rosenzweig Picture- whose properties model referred to as a scatter Frustration Study, empirical properties of the diagram, a graphic 438–440 objects or traits to which description of correlation Rotter Incomplete Sentences numbers or other symbols are achieved by graphing the Blank, assigned, 72, 241–242 coordinate points for the two 442–443 routing test: absolute zero points variables, 129–133 A subtest used to direct in, 75–77 Schedule for Affective or route the testtaker to a continuous, 72–73 Disorders and suitable level of items, discrete, 72 interval, Schizophrenia (SADS), 316 75–76 Likert, 240– 474 schema: In Piagetian Rule 702, 60 241 nominal, 74, 76 theory, an action or mental Russell, J. T., ordinal, 74–76 structure that, when applied 185 to the world, leads to knowing or understanding, s factor: In Spearman’s two- I-23 281 factor theory of scale: (continued) rating, schemata: The plural of intelligence, a specifi c 202, 239, schema, as in “Infants are component of g, such as 346–349, 457– born with several simple a specifi c ability; 559 ratio, 76–77 schemata, including contrast with g factor summative, 240 sucking and grasping,” and group factors, 283 – scaling: (1) In test 281 284 construction, the process Scholastic Aptitude Test SADS. See Schedule for of setting rules for (SAT), 98, 122, Affective assigning numbers in 360–361 Disorders and measurement; (2) the school ability tests, 20, 340– Schizophrenia Salomone, process by which a 341. See also Kathleen, 513 sample: A measuring device is educational assessment; group of people presumed designed and calibrated preschool assessment to be representative of the and the way numbers (or School and College Ability total population or universe other indices that are Test, 567 of people being studied or scale values) are SCID-D-R. See Structured tested, 112 assigned to different Clinical Interview for sample approach, 453 amounts of the trait, Dissociative sampling: A general attribute, or Disorders-Revised reference to the characteristic measured; SCII. See Strong-Campbell process of developing a (3) assigning numbers in Interest sample, 112 accordance with empirical Inventory score: A code item, 140 norms or summary statement— developed from, 112– properties of objects or usually but not necessarily 118 SAT. See Scholastic traits, 237, numerical—that refl ects an Aptitude Test 239–243 scalogram evaluation of the SATB. See Special Aptitude analysis: an item-analysis performance on a test, task, Test Battery procedure and approach to interview, or other sample of behavior, 5–6. See also screening: A relatively true-false, multiple-choice, standard score superfi cial process of and matching items) as generalizability of, evaluation based on opposed to constructing 110 limitations of, certain minimal or creating one; contrast 343 meaning standards, criteria, or with constructed- attached to, 30 requirements; contrast response format, 245 scoring: The process of with selection, classifi selection: A process assigning evaluative cation, and placement, whereby each person codes or statements to 560 – 561 evaluated for a position performance on tests, screening tool: (1) An is either accepted or tasks, interviews, or instrument or procedure rejected; contrast with other behavior samples, used to identify a screening, classifi 6 particular trait or cation, and placement, anchor protocol for, 272– constellation of traits at a 560 – 561 273 gross or imprecise level, selection ratio: A numerical as opposed to a test of value that greater precision used for refl ects the relationship I-24 more defi nitive diagnosis between the number of class, 253 cumulative, or evaluation; (2) in people to be hired and 104 error variance from, preschool assessment, an the number of people 141–142 extended report instrument or procedure available to be hired, of, 13 fi xed reference used as a fi rst step in 185, 210, group, 121–122 inter- identifying a child who is 221–222 self-concept: scorer reliability and, “at risk” or not One’s attitudes, beliefs, 150–151 ipsative, 253– functioning within opinions, and related 254 of items, in test normal limits; (3) in thoughts about oneself, development, employment settings, an 385–386 253–254 of personality instrument or procedure self-concept differentiation: assessments, 397–398 of used as a gross measure The degree to which an Rorschach test, 428–430 to determine who meets individual has different simple report of, 13 of minimum requirements self-concepts in different Stanford-Binet set by the employer, 337 roles, 386 Intelligence Scale, SD scales. See social self-concept measure: An 318–319 scoring drift: desirability scales instrument designed to A discrepancy between the SDMT. See Stanford yield information about scoring in an anchor Diagnostic Mathematics how an individual sees protocol and the scoring of Test him- or herself with another protocol, 273 SDRT. See Stanford regard to selected scoring report: A formal or Diagnostic Reading Test psychological variables, offi cial computer- SDS. See Self-Directed the data from which are generated account of test Search usually interpreted in the performance, usually Seashore Bennett context of how others represented numerically; Stenographic Profi ciency may see themselves on the two varieties are the Test, 564 Seashore Measures the same or similar simple scoring report of Musical Talent, 363 variables, 385 (containing only a report second-order factors, 333 Self-Directed Search (SDS), of the scores) and the secondary-school aptitude 382, 402, extended scoring report tests, 360–362 Secret 548–549 self-effi cacy: (containing item Service, 493–494 selected- Confi dence in one’s own statistics); contrast with response format: A form of ability to accomplish a task, interpretive report and test item requiring testtakers 473 integrative report, 13 to select a response (e.g., Self-Help Agency are examined for independent variable and Satisfaction Scale, fairness to all one dependent variable, 582 self- prospective testtakers 133 monitoring: The act and for the presence of simple scoring report: A type of offensive language, of systematically observing stereotypes, or scoring report that and recording aspects of situations, 267 provides only a listing of one’s own behavior sensory defi cits, 514–515, scores, 13 and/or events related to 518 sentence completion simultaneous learners, 370 that behavior, 460 stem: All the words that simultaneous processing: self-report: The process make up the part of a Also called parallel wherein an assessee sentence completion item, processing; based on Luria’s supplies personal not including the blank writings, a type of information in forms space to be completed by information processing such as responding to the testtaker, 442 sentence whereby information is questions, keeping a completion tests, 395, 397, integrated and synthesized all diary, or reporting on 442–443, 502, 567 at once and as a whole; selfmonitored thoughts sequential learners, 370 contrast with successive and/or behaviors, 41, sequential processing. See processing, 288 385 successive single photon emission objectivity and, 425 processing computed tomography. problems with, 399, 7 Minute Screen, 522 See SPECT 425 Severe Impairment Battery SIRS. See Structured semantic differential (SIB), Interview of Reported technique: An item 540–541 severity error: Symptoms Situational format characterized by Less than accurate rating or Competency Test, 489 bipolar adjectives error in evaluation due to the situational performance separated by a seven- rater’s tendency to be overly measure: A procedure that point rating scale on critical; contrast with typically involves the which respondents select generosity error, 202 , 387 performance of a task by the one point shifting cultural lenses, assessee under actual or to indicate their response, 483, 486 Shoemaker, simulated conditions while 396, Adam, 175 short form: An allowing for observation and 585–586 semantic abbreviated version of a evaluation by an assessor, memory: Memory for facts; test that has typically been 461–462 contrast with episodic reduced in number of Sixteen Personality Factor memory, items from the original, (16PF) usually to reduce the time Questionnaire, 403 535 – 536 needed for test 16PF Questionnaire. See semi-interquartile range: A administration, scoring, Sixteen measure of and/or interpretation, 330– Personality Factor variability equal to the 331 Questionnaire skewness: An interquartile range Short Portable Mental Status indication of the nature and divided by 2, 88 Questionnaire, 521 extent to which symmetry is semi-structured short-answer, 247, 249 absent in a distribution; a techniques, 440 Sensation- SIB. See Severe distribution is said to be Seeking Scale (SSS), 103 Impairment Battery sign skewed positively when sensitivity review: A study approach, 453 simple relatively few scores fall at of test items, usually frequency distribution, 78 the positive end and skewed during test development, simple regression: The negatively when relatively in which items few scores fall at the negative analysis of the relationship between one end, 91–92 Skinner, B. F., 443–444 slope bias: A Spearman, Charles, 128–129, achievement or ability, reference to the slope of a 283–284, 297 with a time limit; speed regression line being Spearman-Brown formula: tests usually contain different between groups, An items of uniform diffi this term refers to a test or equation used to culty level, measurement procedure estimate internal 154–155, 264–265 systematically yielding consistency reliability Spielberger, Charles D., 383 different validity coeffi cients from a correlation of split-half reliability: An for members of different two halves of a test that estimate of the internal groups; contrast with has been lengthened or consistency of a test obtained intercept bias, 200 by correlating two pairs of shortened; inappropriate social desirability (SD) scores obtained from for use with scales, 399 social facilitation: heterogeneous tests or equivalent halves of a single The process by which the test administered once, 145 speed tests, 146–148 presence of one or more Spearman-Brown formula Spearman’s rho: Also people can infl uence the for, referred to as the rank- performance of other 146–148 order correlation coeffi persons; in the context of of speed cient and the psychological assessment, it tests, 154 rank-difference refers more specifi cally to Sputnik, 55 correlation coeffi cient, the infl uence of third parties on the performance of the this index of correlation SSHA. See Survey of Study may be the statistic of Habits and Attitudes assessee, 16 Social Situation choice when the sample SSS. See Sensation-Seeking Picture Test, 432 social size is small and both sets Scale STAI. See State-Trait support: Expressions of of measurements are Anxiety Inventory standard understanding, acceptance, ordinal, 128–129 Special battery: The administration empathy, love, advice, Aptitude Test Battery of a group of at least three guidance, care, concern, or (SATB), different types of tests for the trust from friends, family, community caregivers, or 550 specifi c learning purpose of evaluating others in one’s social disability (SLD): A different spheres of disorder in one or more of functioning: usually an environment, 473 the basic psychological intelligence test, a sociogram: A graphic processes involved in personality test, and a representation of peer understanding or using neuropsychological test, appraisal data or other language, spoken or 481–482 standard interpersonal information, written, that may manifest deviation: A measure of 376 itself in the imperfect variability equal to the square soft sign: In ability to listen, think, root of the averaged squared neuropsychological speak, read, write, spell, or deviations about the mean; a assessment, an perform mathematical measure of variability equal indication that calculations, 351 to the square root of the neurological defi cit may SPECT (single photon variance, 89–91 be present; for example, emission computed standard error of the a signifi cant tomography): A difference: A statistic discrepancy between Verbal and Performance technology that records designed to aid in the course of a determining how large subtests on a radioactive tracer fl uid a difference between Wechsler test, 517 (iodine) and produces two scores should be sounds, as projective exceptionally clear before it is considered stimuli, 443–444 source photographs of organs statistically signifi cant, traits, 403 Southern and tissues, 542 168–170 California Sensory Integration Tests, 540 speed test: A test, usually of standard error of the of comparison or ); (2) in psychoanalytic estimate: In regression, judgment, 114 theory, an inferred an estimate of the standardized test: A test or magnitude of error; the measure that has lower the degree of undergone standardization, correlation, the higher the I-26 114, 117–118 Standards standard error of the for Educational and psychodynamic estimate, disposition designed to Psychological Testing, 16, convey the dynamic 115, 135 standard error 54, 69, of measurement: In true quality of id, ego, and 113, 123n6 superego in perpetual score theory, a statistic designed to estimate the Stanford Achievement Test confl ict, 102, 382–383 series, 267 state anxiety, 383 State- extent to Stanford Diagnostic Trait Anxiety Inventory Mathematics Test (STAI), I-25 (SDMT), 368 383 static standard error of Stanford Diagnostic Reading characteristic: A trait, state, measurement: (continued) Test (SDRT), 368 or ability presumed to be which an observed score Stanford-Binet Intelligence relatively unchanging over deviates from a true Scale administration of, time; contrast with score; also called the 316–318 categories of, 319 dynamic characteristic, 153 standard error of a score, CHC model and, 311, 314– statistics 164 315 cultural considerations, consumers and, reliability and, 160, 164, 43, 69 development of, 73 data 166–168 311–314 features of, 312– described in, 77– Stanford-Binet Intelligence 313 fi fth edition, 314–319 92 Scale and, 168 limitations of, 312–313 fi t, 335 standard score: A raw score psychometric soundness of, frequency distributions in, that has been converted 315–316 scoring and 78–80, 82–83 general from one scale into interpretation of, principles of, 484 importance another, where the latter 318–319 short form of, of, 71 kurtosis in, 92 scale (1) has some 330 standard errors of measurement scales in, 72– arbitrarily set mean and measurement of, 77 measures of central standard deviation and (2) 168 tendency in, 80–87 measures is more widely used and standardization of, of variability in, 87–91 readily interpretable; 314–315 normal curve in, 80, 82, 93– examples of standard Wechsler intelligence tests 96 skewness in, 91–92 scores are z scores and T v., 315 , standard scores in, 96–100, scores, 96 327–328 stanine: A 115 Sternberg, Robert, 289, normalized, 99– standard score derived 308 stratifi ed sampling: The 100 stanine, 98– from a scale with a mean process of developing a 99 T scores, 97 z of 5 and a standard sample based on specifi c scores, 96–97, deviation of subgroups of a population, 100, 115 approximately 2, 98–99, 112 stratifi ed-random 237 sampling: The process of standardization. See test state: (1) As in personality developing a sample based standardization on specifi c subgroups of a standardize: The verb “to state, the transitory exhibition of a trait, population in which every standardize” refers to indicative of a relatively member has the same chance making or transforming temporary predisposition of being included in the something into something to behave in a particular sample, 112 Strauss, Alfred, that can serve as a basis way (contrast with trait 515 streetwiseness, 301, 307 stress interview: An interview purposely designed summative scale: An index standard deviations below to pressure or stress the derived from the the mean; a normal curve interviewee in order to gauge summing of selected has two tails, 93 reaction to that stress, 474 scores on a test or subtest, Tarasoff v. Regents of the Stresseraser, 27 240 University of California, Strong, Edward K., Jr., 546 supplemental subtest: Also 68 – 69 , 491 Strong Interest Inventory, referred to as an optional TAT. See Thematic 546–548 subtest, one of a test’s Apperception Test Strong Vocational Interest subtests that may be used tautophone, 443 Taylor, H. Blank either for purposes of C., 185 (SVIB), 269, 546 providing additional Taylor-Russell tables: Strong-Campbell Interest information or in place of Statistical tables once Inventory a core subtest if, for any extensively used to (SCII), 546 reason, the use of a score provide test users with an Structured Clinical Interview on a core subtest would estimate of the extent to for be questionable; contrast which inclusion of a Dissociative Disorders- with core subtest, 322 particular test in the Revised surface traits, 403 survey: In selection system would (SCID-D-R), 474 consumer psychology, a fi improve selection structured interview: xed list of questions decisions, 185, 187–188, Questions posed from a administered to a selected 224 guide with little if any sample of persons, typically teaching item: A test item leeway to deviate from the to learn about consumers’ designed to illustrate guide, 393 attitudes, beliefs, opinions, the task required and Structured Interview of and/or behavior regarding assure the examiner Reported Symptoms targeted products, services, that the examinee (SIRS), 474 or advertising, understands what is Study Attitudes and Methods 584–586 required for success on Survey, Survey of Study Habits and the task, 316 377, 582 study habits, Attitudes (SSHA), 377 team, 573 Technical assessment of, 376–377 SVIB. See Strong Recommendations Study Habits Checklist, Vocational Interest Blank syndrome: A for 376 subgroup norms: Achievement Tests Norms for any set of co-occurring emotional and behavioral (NEA), 62 defi ned group within a larger group, 121 problems, 346 Technical Recommendations substance abuse, for T score: Named for Psychological Tests and clinical/counseling Thorndike, a standard assessment for, 488–490 Diagnostic score calculated using a successive processing: Also Tests (APA), 61 scale with a mean set at referred to as sequential telephone surveys, 585 50 and a standard processing; based on teleprocessing: Computerized deviation set at 10; used Luria’s writings, a type of by developers of the scoring, interpretation, or information processing other conversion of raw test MMPI, 97 whereby information is data sent over telephone lines tactile memory tests, 537 processed in a sequential, by modem from a test site to tail: The area on the bit-by-bit fashion and a central location for normal curve between 2 computer processing; arranged and rearranged and 3 standard deviations until it is logical; contrast contrast with central above the mean, and the with simultaneous processing and local area on the normal curve processing, 288 processing, 13 between –2 and –3 temperament: With reference test blueprint: A detailed 147 , 153 test to personality plan of the content, homogeneity: The extent to assessments of infants, organization, and which individual test items the distinguishing manner quantity of the items measure a single construct; of the child’s observable that a test will contain, contrast with test actions and reactions, 176–177 heterogeneity, 147 , 153, 300–301 test composite: A test score 194–195 tender years doctrine, 498, or index test manual: An archival 500 Terman, Lewis M., 294, derived from the document in any media 296–297, 297n2, combination and/or (booklet, book, electronic 311, 313 terminal values: mathematical form, etc.) devoted to a Guiding principles and a transformation of one or detailed description of a mode of behavior that are an more test scores, 314 test and usually available endpoint objective; for test developers, 15– from the test’s publisher, example, “a comfortable life” 16, 100 of that ideally provides all and “an exciting life”; intelligence tests, of the key information contrast with instrumental 310 prospective test users values, 419 standardization by, need to know in order to ”termites”: Humorous 114 strengths and make an informed reference to gifted weaknesses decision about whether children who participated balanced the test is appropriate for in Lewis M. Terman’s by, 268 use with a particular study of intelligence validity and, 184 of testtaker for a particular initiated in 1916, 297n2 Wechsler intelligence purpose, 31, 33 terrorism, 391–392 test: A tests, 331 test revision, 267–275 test measuring device or test development standardization: A process of procedure, from blueprint, 176– test development wherein the 5–7. See also specifi 177 conceptualization test is administered to a c tests catalogs, 30–31, in, 233–237 control representative sample of 33 environment of, 24, group in, 407 with testtakers under clearly 28, 29–30 ”good,” 107– empirical criterion specifi ed conditions and the 110 manuals, 31, 33 keying, data are scored and strengths and 404–406 error and, 140 interpreted; the results weaknesses of, 105 IRT in, 260, 273–275 item establish a context for future test battery: A selection of analysis in, 233, 255–267 test administrations with tests and assessment item development issues in, other testtakers, 3 7–38, 112, procedures typically 235–236 items scored in, 113–115, composed of tests 253–254 items written in, 117–118, 314–315, 324, designed to measure 244–253 of personality tests, 330, 407 test user, 16–17, different variables but 398–400 preliminary 24–25, 71. See also having a common questions in, 234–235 inter-scorer reliability objective; for example, an process of, 233–234 revision qualifi cations of, 62– intelligence test, a in, 267–275 scaling in, 237, 63 validity and, 184 personality test, and a 239–243 tryout in, 254–255 test utility. See utility neuropsychological test Test of Grocery Shopping testing enterprise: A general might be used to obtain a Skills, 11–12 test reference to the engagement general psychological heterogeneity: The extent to of individuals, profi le of an individual, which individual test items organizations, and 148n5, 286–287, 343, do not measure a single businesses in aspects of 368–373, 481–482, 538– construct but instead measure psychological measurement 539, 550. See also specifi different factors; contrast ranging from c test batteries with test homogeneity, instrument development interpretation of, 435 IRT 297 three-stratum theory of through instrument and, 468 liberties taken cognitive abilities: John B. administration and with, 433–434 in MPS, 567 Carroll’s conception of interpretation, 2 origin of, 433 pros and mental abilities and testing the limits: (1) In cons of, 448–449 processing classifi ed by ability testing, the psychometric soundness of, three levels or strata, with g continued administration 435–437 rationale of, 438 at the broadest level followed of test items beyond the raw material of, 434–435 by eight abilities or processes level at which the test sample picture from, 435– at the second level and a manual dictates 437 value of, 437–438 number of more narrowly discontinuance, usually Theories of Personality (Hall defi ned abilities and conducted only when the and processes at the third level, examiner has reason to Lindzey), 378–379 285, 287 Thurstone, Louis believe an examinee can therapeutic contract: An L., 237, 240, 310, 583 timed “pass” the higher-level agreement made between a tests, 49 timeline followback items; (2) in the therapist and a client (TLFB) methodology: A administration of the regarding various aspects of technique of behavioral Rorschach test, an the therapeutic process, 474 observation that involves the optional interview (after therapeutic psychological recording of the frequency the initial inquiry) in assessment: A and the intensity of a targeted which the examiner asks collaborative approach behavior over time, 455 questions designed to wherein discovery of TLFB methodology. See yield additional insights therapeutic insights about timeline followback into the assessee’s oneself are encouraged methodology thought processes and and actively promoted by top-down selection: A personality, 317n3, 429 the assessor throughout process of awarding test-related behavior, 104– the assessment process, 4 available positions to 105 test-retest reliability: “think aloud” test applicants whereby the An estimate of reliability administration: A highest scorer is awarded obtained by correlating method of qualitative the fi rst position, the pairs of scores from the item analysis requiring next highest scorer the same people on two examinees to verbalize next position, and so forth different administrations of their thoughts until all of the positions the same test, are fi lled, 217 143–144, 153–154, Torrance Tests of Creative 431 testtaker, 17–19, 29– Thinking, 30 I-27 342 error variance and, 141 “think aloud” test Tower of Hanoi, 526–527 measurement equivalence administration: trail-making item: An item across populations of, 273– (continued) as they take that taps visual-conceptual, 274 a test; useful in visual-motor, planning, and of personality tests, understanding how other cognitive abilities by 385–391 response individual items function means of a task in which the styles of, 390–391 in a test and how testtaker must connect the rights of, 66–70 testtakers interpret or circles in a logical fashion; thema: In the personality misinterpret the meaning the component of the theory of Henry of individual items, 265– Halstead-Reitan Murray, a unit of 266 Neuropsychological Battery interaction between third moments of called the Trail Making Test need and press, 435 distribution, 128 third-order is one of the most widely Thematic Apperception Test factors, 333 Thorndike, used instruments for the (TAT) APT and, 439 Edward L., 2 31, 232, 292, assessment of brain damage, 528–529 trait: Any 254–255 two-factor theory test situation, including all distinguishable, relatively of intelligence: Spearman’s the factors that lead to an enduring way in which one theory of general individual testtaker’s score, individual varies from intelligence, which 157 another; contrast with postulates the existence of a universe score: In state, 101 , 379–381, general intellectual ability generalizability theory, a 403, 556–567 existence factor (g) that is partially test score corresponding of, 101–103 quantifi ed tapped by all other mental to the particular universe and measured, 103–104 abilities, 283–284, 286–288, being assessed or trait anxiety, 383 transient 301 evaluated, 157 error: A source of error Tyler Vocational Classifi University of Pennsylvania attributable to variations cation System, Smell in the testtaker’s feelings, 395 type: As in Identifi cation Test moods, or mental state personality type, a (UPSIT), 518 unobtrusive over time, 152 constellation of traits and measure: A type of measure translators, 48, 483 states similar in pattern to that does not necessarily TRIN scale. See True one identifi ed category require the presence or Response of personality within a cooperation of respondents, Inconsistency scale taxonomy of often a telling physical trace personalities, 382 or record, type A personality: In 464 unrestricted ranges, I-28 Friedman and 132–133 UPSIT. See True Response Inconsistency Rosenman’s typology, a University of Pennsylvania (TRIN) scale, 411, 417 personality characterized Smell Identifi cation Test true score theory: Also by competitiveness, user norms: Also referred to referred to as the true haste, restlessness, as program norms, score model or classical impatience, feelings of descriptive statistics based on test theory, a system of being time-pressured, a group of testtakers in a assumptions about and strong needs for given period of time rather measurement that achievement and than on norms obtained by includes the notion that a dominance, 382 formal sampling methods, test score (and even a type B personality: In 111 UT score. See uniform T response to an individual Friedman and score utility ( also test item) is composed of a Rosenman’s typology, a utility): In the context of relatively stable personality characterized psychological testing and component that actually by traits (e.g., “mellow” assessment, a reference to is what the test or and “laid-back”) that are how useful a test or individual item is opposite the Type A assessment technique is for a designed to measure as personality, 382 particular purpose, 6, 189– well as a random 190, 192–193, 209 component that is error, unidimensional scale, 237, benefi ts infl 106, 157 true variance: 241 Uniform Guidelines on uencing, 212–215 In the true score model, the Employee Selection clinical, 208 component of variance Procedures, 57 – 58 comparative, 208 attributable to true uniform T score: costs infl uencing, differences in the ability or Abbreviated UT, 210–212 decision trait being measured that are a variety of T score used theory and, 189–190, inherent in an observed score in the 192–193 diagnostic, or distribution of scores, 140 MMPI-2, 412 units of 208 questions related to, true-false item, 247 truth-in- measure, 1 universe: In 208–209 reliability and testing legislation, 57 generalizability theory, the validity infl uencing, tryout, in test development, total context of a particular 209–210 bias and, 199–203 coeffi (VRIN) scale, 411, 417 theory, 189 cient, 183–184 concept variance: A measure of utility analysis: A family of of, 172–174 construct, variability equal to the techniques designed to 173, 193–199, 238, 297 arithmetic mean of the evaluate the costs and content, 173, 176–180, squares of the differences benefi ts of testing and not 238 convergent, 197n3 between the scores in a testing in terms of likely face, 174–176 fairness distribution and their mean, outcomes, 215 BCG and, 199, 203–207 89–90, 140. See also bias; formula in, 216, 223–224 generalization, GATB error variance cut score in, 220–223, 225– and, 552–554 VCAT. See Veterinary 232 expectancy data in, incremental, 184–185 College 216, 224 illustration of, scales, 390–391, 399– Admission Test verbal 217–223 practical 400, 408, 417 of short communication, 47–48 considerations, 224–227 forms, 330–331 verbal functioning tests, 533– productivity gain and, 223– shrinkage, 270 test 534 verbal, perceptual, and 224 purpose of, 215–216 developers, users and, image rotation (VPR) model: utility gain: An estimate of 184 utility infl uenced by, A hierarchical model of the the benefi t, monetary or 209–210 structure of mental abilities, otherwise, of using a validity coeffi cient: A with a g factor that particular test or selection correlation coeffi cient contributes to verbal, method, 216 that provides a measure perceptual, and image of the relationship rotation abilities in addition validation: The process of between test scores and to eight more specialized gathering scores on a criterion abilities, 295 and evaluating validity measure, 183–184 verbal summator, 443 verbal- evidence, 173 validity scale: A subscale of performance dichotomy, validation study: Research a test designed to assist 280– 281, 291, 319 that entails gathering in judgments regarding Veterinary College evidence relevant to how how honestly the Admission Test well a test measures what testtaker responded and (VCAT), 364 it purports to measure for whether or not observed Viirre, Erik, 212, 213, 512 the purpose of evaluating responses were products vocational assessment, the validity of a test or of response style, 51–52 VRIN scale. See other measurement tool, carelessness, deliberate Variable Response 173 efforts to deceive, or Inconsistency scale validity: A general term unintentional vulnerable abilities: In the referring to a judgment misunderstanding, 390– CattellHorn model of regarding how well a 391, 399– intelligence, cognitive test or other 400, 408, 417 validity abilities that decline with age measurement tool shrinkage: The decrease in and that do not return to measures what it item validities that preinjury levels after brain purports to measure; this inevitably occurs after damage; contrast with judgment has important cross-validation, 270 maintained abilities, 285 implications regarding values: That which an Vygotsky, Lev the appropriateness of individual prizes; ideals Semyonovitch, 364–365 inferences made and believed in, 419 variability: actions taken on the An indication of how scores WAIS. See Wechsler Adult basis of measurements, in a distribution are scattered Intelligence Scale 108, 110, 170, 172. See or dispersed, 87. See also Washington University also criterion-related measure of variability Sentence Completion validity Variable Response Test, 442 Inconsistency WASI. See Wechsler short forms of, 330–331 Woodcock Reading Mastery Abbreviated Scale of Stanford-Binet TestsRevised (WRMT- Intelligence Intelligence Scale v., R), 366–367 WCST-64. See Wisconsin 315 , 327–328 subtests Woodcock-Johnson III (WJ- Card Sorting Test-64 of, 329 verbal- III), 286, Card Version performance dichotomy 371–373 Wechsler Abbreviated Scale in, Woodworth Psychoneurotic of Intelligence (WASI), 280–281, 291, 319 Inventory, 331 Wechsler Memory Scale 41, 401 Wechsler Adult Intelligence (WMS-IV), Woodworth, Robert S., 40– Scale 271, 536–537 41 word association: A type (WAIS), 40, 271, 281, Wechsler Preschool and of task that may be used in 305–306 current version of, Primary Scale of personality assessment in 322–324 fourth edition of, Intelligence (WPPSI) which an assessee verbalizes 321–325 heritage of, 321– changes in, 328–329 the fi rst word that comes to 322 psychometric interest in, 327–328 mind in response to a soundness of, 324–325 standardization stimulus word, 4 40–442, standardization and norms edition of, 330 441n5, 533 Word of, 324 subtests of, 322– structure of, 329–330 Association Test, 441 words, 324, 329 subtests of, 328–329 as projective stimuli sentence Wechsler-Bellevue Weigl’s Test. See Color- completion tests, 442–443 Intelligence Scale, Form Sorting Test word-association tests, 440– 43–44, 291 Welsh code: A shorthand 442 Wechsler, David summary of a testtaker’s Work Preference Inventory deterioration quotient of, scores on the MMPI (WPI), 576 525 on intelligence, 40, clinical and validity World War I, 1, 40, 54, 178– 280–281, 286, 290, scales, 410, 412 180, 336, 291, 300, 319, Wepman Auditory 401 World War II, 1–2, 322, 324 on short Discrimination Test, 530 394 worldview: The unique forms, 330 Werner, Heinz, 515 way people interpret and Wechsler Individual Wertheimer, Max, 530 make sense of their Achievement What I Like to Do Interest perceptions in light of their Test-Second Edition (WIAT- Inventory, learning experiences, cultural II), 352 376 background, and related Wechsler Intelligence Scale WIAT-II. See Wechsler variables, 422 for Individual WPI. See Work Preference Children (WISC), 47, Achievement Test- Inventory 272 background of, 325 Second Edition Wide Range WPPSI. See Wechsler changes to, 325–326 CHC Achievement Test-4, 352 Preschool and Primary model and, 325–326 WISC. See Wechsler Scale of Intelligence fourth edition of, 325–327 Intelligence Scale for WRMT-R. See Woodcock Stanford-Binet Children Reading Mastery Tests- Intelligence Scale v., Wisconsin Card Sorting Revised 327 – 328 Test-64 Card Version Wundt, Wilhelm Max, 37 subtests of, (WCST-64), 526 Witmer, WWI. See World 329 Lightner, 38 War I WWII. See Wechsler intelligence tests. WJ-III. See Woodcock- World War II See also specifi c tests Johnson III WMS-IV. See z score: A standard score changes in, 319 Wechsler Memory Scale derived by calculating the commonalities among, Wonderlic Personnel Test, difference between a 321 developers of, 331 548 particular raw score and items used in, 320–321 the mean and then dividing by the standard deviation; a z score expresses a score in terms of the number of standard deviation units that the raw score is below or above the mean of the distribution, 96–97, 100, 115 Zillmer, Eric A., 392