* Please note that for each DCF that you do, the breakdown of the line-items on the financial stateme
* Please consult SEC filings, Bloomberg, or Google/Yahoo! Finance to obtain financial statement data
* A rigorous DCF will further break down the conventional GAAP line items to incorporate even more
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact a Director or your Portfolio Manager for
Happy modeling,
Andrew Han
DCF Dashboard
in $ mm's
Source 2013 10K SEC Filing, Google Finance, and Bloomberg
Company WebMD
Ticker WBMD
Current Price $48.35
Terminal Growth Rate 2.00%
Market Risk Premium 6.00% NYU prof estimate. http://people.stern.nyu.edu/ad
Risk-Free Rate 2.30% 10-yr treasury. http://www.bloomberg.com/market
WACC 5.75%
Notes This is where you would note important assumptions that you've included in
on the financial statements will vary from company to company and ought to be customized accordingly.
financial statement data.
o incorporate even more granular assumptions. We strongly suggest that you do so.
people.stern.nyu.edu/adamodar/
bloomberg.com/markets/rates-bonds/government-bonds/us/
anies will cause them to slash marketing budgets, which poses a real threat to WebMD revenue.
Public Portal Advertising and Sponsors 447 477.3 391.3 433.2 476.52
% change 6.78% -18.02% 10.71% 10.00%
Private Portal Services 87.6 81.5 78.5 82.1 86.21
% change -6.96% -3.68% 4.59% 5.00%
Revenue 534.6 558.77 469.87 515.29 562.73
% change 4.52% -15.91% 9.67% 9.21%
2 2 2 2
0 0 0 0
These are WebMD specific revenue segments. Ideally you want to break it out for your company
This way it's a lot more granular than just projecting out total revenue
I obviously didn't incorporate great assumptions (10% and 5%)
Of course, revenue segment data is a lot harder to find. Dig in the SEC filings or go to the Bloomberg
Since it's September 2014 when I'm putting this together, two quarters have already passed in 2014.
Assumption: they will need to increase marketing to drive advertising revenue to compete with FB an
Struck out all of this because these are unusual expenses difficult to forecast individiually
Literally "extraordinary" so don't bother modeling it out unless there's some semblance of a recurrin
t out for your company
ave already passed in 2014. YTD information can help guide annual projections. Use common sense and compa
ast individiually
me semblance of a recurring nature. Pretty much here only to reconcile historical income statements
mon sense and compare your assumptions against YTD performance.
statements
Balance Sheet
in $ mms Historical Projected
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
0.72 -2.78 0.93 The working capital calculation is supposed to be non-cash work
which is calculated as AR - AP + Inventory.
50.8 60.5
28.00 28.00 Naively keeping it constant for now; you'd want to inform these decisions
-2.78 0.93
25.52 26.31 Rolling average assumption
56.09 61.24
nform these decisions more
Fair Value Calculation
all numbers in mm's
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Projected Year 1 2 3 4
FCF 67.35 210.14 36.99 30.61 37.75 47.43 56.09
Discount Factor 1.06 1.12 1.18 1.25
Discounted 28.95 33.76 40.11 44.85
WACC Assumptions
WACC 5.75%