REPORT ON ANALYSIS AND DESIGN

of
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
for
Mr. LOK BAHADUR DAGAMI,
BUTWAL.
 T O WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

I consultant (Mr. Gopinath chapagain)) going to issue this disclaimer letter

on behalf of final structural analysis and design report for Mr. LOK
BAHADUR DAGAMI, BUTWAL) during and after construction of
proposed super structure.

This report comprises the summary of the design of Residential Building. The
report consists of the design procedure adopted, assumptions made and input
and output from the design and analysis. It is assumed that the Client will
completely follow the Structural Design specified in the form of Design
Drawings attached in the report.

The Designer will not be responsible if any alteration to the structural system
and configuration made by Client without consultation and permission from
the Designer.

The design calculations and derivations are limited to only a minimum to let
the concerned people know the methodology adopted. However, the
calculations may be provided to the Client or the concerned Authority upon
request.

……………………………….
Er. GOPINATH CHAPAGAIN
M.Tech. in Structural Engineering
NEC NO: 12869 “Civil” “A”
Email: gpn001234@gmail.com
Mobile: 9867792792

ii
 1. INTRODUCTION
Structural design aims to design a safe structure against expected loads to come in the life period
of the structure due to the dead weights of the structural components, occupancies, wind, earthquakes,
snow, settlements etc. This phase consists of mainly two stages, first is the Analysis, and next is the
Design and detailing of the structure and structural elements to achieve the safest, economically viable
at par with the latest Nepal Standard Codes and Indian Standard codes.
Earthquake is not likely to occur simultaneously with wind. Structure design and analysis has
been performed using ETABS 17. We have found this tool as user-friendly & reliable. In spite of their
efficiency and reliability, we don’t hesitate to accept and realize that there is always space for
improvements.

1.1. SALIENT FEATURES

GENERAL
Building Structure Type : Frame Structure
Number of Storey applied 3
For permit (in nos.)
Number of Storeys considered in: 3
Structural design (in nos.)
Provision for further extension: Yes
Considered or not
Name of (CAD) used for design : ETABS 2017 V17.2.0
Total height (h) of super : 9.6 m
structure

Requirements of NBC

NBC-100:1994
Level of design : Professionally Engineered Structures

NBC-101:1994
Materials used : Cement, Coarse Aggregate, Fine
Aggregate (Sand), Bricks
NBC-102:1994 Unit weight of material
Steel : 7850 Kg/m3
Brick : 19 KN/m3
RCC : 25 KN/m3
Brick Masonry : 20 KN/m3

NBC-103:1994 Occupancy load (Imposed Load)

Room and Kitchen : 2 KN/m2
Corridor, Staircase, Store
: 3 KN/m2 Balcony : 3 KN/m2
NBC-104:1994 Wind Load
Wind Zone :A
Basic Wind Speed (m/s) 47

NBC-105:1994 Seismic Design of Building in Nepal

Method adopted for earthquake Resistant : Seismic coefficient method
design

Adopted Code for Seismic Design : NBC-105:1994

Subsoil category : Type III (Soft)
Seismic Weight (W) (in KN) : 5066.217
Fundamental Time Period of the Building : 0.64 Sec
along X (Tx)

Fundamental Time Period of the : 0.616 Sec

Building along Y (Ty)
Basic Seismic Coefficient along X (C) : 0.08 Basic
Seismic Coefficient along Y (C) : 0.08 Seismic
zoning factor (Z) 0.9
Importance factor (I) 1
Structural performance factor(K) 1
Design Horizontal Seismic Coefficient Along X (Cd) : 0.08
Design Horizontal Seismic Coefficient Along Y (Cd) : 0.08
Base Shear (VB) Along X : 174.8 kN
Base Shear (VB) Along Y : 181.2 kN
Maximum Inter-Storey Drift : 0.002
Corresponding Storey Height for Maximum Inter- Storey Drift (h) : 3.2m

NBC-106:1994 Snow Load

Snowfall Type or Condition : No Snowfall

NBC-107:1994 Provisional Recommendation on Fire Saftey

Fire safety requirement Considered: No

NBC-108:1994 Site consideration for seismic hazards

Soil type in footing III
Adopted safe bearing capacity : 200 KN/m2
Type of foundation : COMBINE FOOTING ,
ISOLATED FOOTING
Footing Depth of foundation :2m

NBC-110:1994 Plain and reinforced concrete

Concrete Grade : M20
Reinforcement steel grade : Fe 500
1.2 Geometry of the Building:
Shape of Building : Rectangular
Maximum projected Length of building : 11.23 m
(STORY 3)
Maximum projected Width of building : 9.67 m
(SORY 3)
Height of building : 9.6m
Length to Width ratio : 1.16
Height to Width ratio : 0.99
2. LOADS

2.1. Dead load / Imposed Load

Dead Load - IS : 875 (Part 1) - 1987 as per NBC 102 : 1994

Imposed Load - IS : 875 ( Part 2 ) – 1987 as per NBC 103 : 1994

SN DEAD LOAD REMARK LIVE LOAD REMARK

9" wall without Floor/bath
a). 12.5 2
opening (kN/m) room/kitchen (kN/m2)
9" wall with
b). 8.8 Corridor/stair (kN/m2) 3
opening (kN/m)
c). 4" wall (kN/m) 6.3/2 Partition/Parapet Roof (kN/m2) 1.5
Floor finish
d). 1.25
(kN/m2)

2.2. Mass Source

Name Load Pattern Multiplier

MsSrc1 DL SELF WT 1
MsSrc1 DL 9"WALL 1
MsSrc1 DL 4"WALL 1
MsSrc1 DL FLOOR FINISH 1
MsSrc1 LL ROOM 0.25
MsSrc1 LL STAIR/CORR 0.25

2.3. Seismic Load:

User Coefficient Auto Seismic Load Calculation

This calculation presents the automatically generated lateral seismic loads for load pattern EQX
using the user input coefficients, as calculated by ETABS.
Direction and Eccentricity

Direction = Multiple
Eccentricity Ratio = 5% for all diaphragms
Factors and

Coefficients

Equivalent Lateral

Forces

Base Shear Coefficient, C C = 0.08

Base Shear, V V = CW
 11-06-2019

Auto Seismic Loading

Table 1.1 - Auto Seismic - IS 1893:2016 (Part 1 of 2)
Period
Load Directio Period Ct Top Bottom Soil
Type Z Type Z I R Used
Pattern n Method m Story Story Type
sec
Program
EQ X Seismic X Story4 Base Per Code 0.36 II 1 5 0.64
Calculated
Program
EQ Y Seismic Y Story4 Base Per Code 0.36 II 1 5 0.616
Calculated

Table 1.1 - Auto Seismic - IS 1893:2016 (Part 2 of 2)

Weight Base
Coeff
Used Shear
Used
kN kN
0.076506 2279.1535 174.3684
0.07952 2279.1535 181.2388

IS 1893:2016 Auto Seismic Load Calculation

This calculation presents the automatically generated lateral seismic loads for load pattern EQ X according to IS
1893:2016, as calculated by ETABS.
Direction and Eccentricity

Direction = X
Structural Period

Period Calculation Method = Program Calculated

Factors and Coefficients

Seismic Zone Factor, Z [IS Table 3] Z = 0.36

Response Reduction Factor, R [IS Table 9] R=5
Importance Factor, I [IS Table 8] I=1
Site Type [IS Table 1] = II

Seismic Response

Spectral Acceleration Coefficient, Sa /g [IS Sa 1.36 Sa

= = 2.12516
6.4.2] g T g

Equivalent Lateral Forces

Sa
ZI
Seismic Coefficient, Ah [IS 6.4.2] g
Ah =
2R

Calculated Base Shear

Period
W Vb
Direction Used
(kN) (kN)
(sec)
X 0.64 2279.1535 174.3684

Page 6 of 49
 11-06-2019

Applied Story Forces

Story Elevation X-Dir Y-Dir

m kN kN
Story4 11.6 97.6466 0
Story3 8.4 54.4292 0
Story2 5.2 20.8584 0
Story1 2 1.4342 0
Base 0 0 0

Page 7 of 49
 11-06-2019

IS 1893:2016 Auto Seismic Load Calculation

This calculation presents the automatically generated lateral seismic loads for load pattern EQ Y according to IS 1893:2016, as
calculated by ETABS.
Direction and Eccentricity

Direction = Y
Structural Period

Period Calculation Method = Program Calculated

Factors and Coefficients

Seismic Zone Factor, Z [IS Table 3] Z = 0.36

Response Reduction Factor, R [IS Table 9] R=5
Importance Factor, I [IS Table 8] I=1
Site Type [IS Table 1] = II

Seismic Response

Spectral Acceleration Coefficient, Sa /g [IS Sa 1.36 Sa

= = 2.208895
6.4.2] g T g

Equivalent Lateral Forces

Sa
ZI
Seismic Coefficient, Ah [IS 6.4.2] g
Ah =
2R

Calculated Base Shear

Period
W Vb
Direction Used
(kN) (kN)
(sec)
Y 0.616 2279.1535 181.2388

Page 8 of 49
 11-06-2019

2.4. Load Combinations

The load combinations that are used for the analysis and design are tabulated below.
SN Load Combination Remark
1 1.5(DL)
2 1.5(DL+LL)
3 1.2(DL+LL+EQX)
4 1.2(DL+LL-EQX)
5 1.2(DL+LL+EQY)
6 1.2(DL+LL-EQY)
7 0.9DL+1.5EQX
8 0.9DL-1.5EQX
9 0.9DL+1.5EQY
10 0.9DL-1.5EQY

3. RELEVANT CODES

3.1. Materials

a) NBC 101
b) Brick: IS 1077, IS 2212)
c) Cement: IS 8112, IS 12269
d) Admixtures: ASTM C 494/C,494/M, IS9103
e) Reinforcing Steel: IS 432, IS 1139, IS 1786

3.2. Loadings

a) Dead Loads: NBC 102, IS 875 Part I

b) Live loads: NBC 103, IS 875 Part II
c) Wind loads: NBC 104
d) Seismic loads: IS 1893 Part 1, NBC 105

3.3. Design Code

a) Reinforced concrete: NBC 110, IS 456, SP 16

b) Ductile detailing: IS 13920, SP34

Page 9 of 49
 11-06-2019

4. STRUCTURAL LAYOUT
4.1. Plan View :

Figure 4.1Typical plan view

4.2. 3D View:

Figure 4.2 Model of the building in 3D view

Page 10 of 49
 11-06-2019

LOAD ASSIGNED

4.3. Wall load

Figure 4.3 Wall loads

11-06-2019

FIGURE: 4.4 DIAPHRAM

11-06-2019

FIGURE :4.5Imposed Load

 11-06-2019

1. ANALYSIS

1.1. Moment Diagram

MD (max and min) due to load combo Envelope is shown for a sample.

Figure 5.1 Bending Moment due to load combo Envelope

 11-06-2019

1.2. Shear Force Diagram

SFD (max and min) due to load combo Envelope is shown for a sample.

Figure 5.2 Shear Force due to load combo Envelope

 11-06-2019

1.3. Axial Force

AF (max and min) due to load combo 1.5(DL+LL) is shown for a sample.

Figure 5.3 Axial Force due to load combo 1.5(DL+LL)

 11-06-2019

1.4. Base Reaction

From the table overall, base reaction was found to be higher at load combo DCon2 i.e.
1.5(DL+LL) which is shown below.

Figure 5.4 Base reaction

 11-06-2019

1.5. CHECK FOR MAXIMUM STORY DRIFT

For seismic load along X direction (EQx):

For seismic load along X direction (EQy):

11-06-2019

All story drifts are less than 0.4% of the story height i.e. 0.004, Hence Safe.
 11-06-2019

2. DESIGN

2.1. Longitudinal Reinforcement (Columns & Beams)

Storey name and axis are according to ETABS software which may not match to architectural
drawing.
Section View at A-A:
 11-06-2019

Section View at B-B:

 11-06-2019

Section View at C-C:

 11-06-2019

Section View at grid D-D :

 11-06-2019

Section View at grid 1-1

 11-06-2019

Section View at grid 2-2

 11-06-2019

Section View at grid 3-3

 11-06-2019

Section View at grid 4-4 :

:

:
:
 11-06-2019

3. DESIGN OF INDIVIDUAL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS

3.1. Sample Design of Column: ( Column of grid A2 first floor)

ETABS Concrete Frame Design

IS 456:2000 Column Section Design

Column Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
Story2 C14 288 COLUMN 300 X 300 0.9DL-1.5EQ Y 2845 3200 1

Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) dc (mm) Cover (Torsion) (mm)
400 300 60 30

Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
24855.58 20 1 500 500

Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3

Design Pu Design Mu2 Design Mu3 Minimum M2 Minimum M3 Rebar Area Rebar %
kN kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m mm² %
175.4055 16.5863 24.07 3.5081 3.5081 960 0.8

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Factors

K Factor Length Initial Moment Additional Moment Minimum Moment
Unitless mm kN-m kN-m kN-m
Major Bend(M3) 0.88968 2845 -2.674 0 3.5081
Minor Bend(M2) 0.935049 2845 -11.7757 0 3.5081

Shear Design for Vu2 , Vu3

 11-06-2019

Shear Vu Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s

kN kN kN kN mm²/m
Major, Vu2 15.0437 56.1836 38.4003 15.0437 443.37
Minor, Vu3 16.1777 57.9393 40.8002 12.9746 332.53

Joint Shear Check/Design

Joint Shear Shear Shear Shear Joint Shear
Force VTop Vu,Tot Vc Area Ratio
kN kN kN kN cm² Unitless
Major Shear, Vu2 0 10.7455 114.8585 509.8235 1140 0.225
Minor Shear, Vu3 0 9.2676 97.8371 536.6563 1200 0.182

(1.4) Beam/Column Capacity Ratio

Major Ratio Minor Ratio
0.481 0.259

Additional Moment Reduction Factor k (IS 39.7.1.1)

Ag Asc Puz Pb Pu k
cm² cm² kN kN kN Unitless
1200 9.6 1440 415.8378 175.4055 1

Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1) (Part 1 of 2)

Consider Length Section KL/Depth KL/Depth KL/Depth
Ma Factor Depth (mm) Ratio Limit Exceeded
Major Bending (M3 ) Yes 0.889 300 8.437 12 No
Minor Bending (M2 ) Yes 0.889 400 6.651 12 No
11-06-2019

3.1.1. Reinforcement details of column section

 11-06-2019

3.2. Sample Design of Beam: (along grid A-A between grid A-1 & A-2, first floor)

ETABS Concrete Frame Design

IS 456:2000 Beam Section Design

Beam Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
Story1 B24 152 BEAM 230 X 355 0.9DL-1.5EQ Y 200 3700 1

Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) bf (mm) ds (mm) dct (mm) dcb (mm)
230 355 230 0 60 60

Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
24855.58 20 1 500 500

Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Factored Forces and Moments

Factored Factored Factored Factored
Mu3 Tu Vu2 Pu
kN-m kN-m kN kN
-23.6654 1.355E-05 29.0192 1.7622

Design Moments, Mu3 & Mt

Factored Factored Positive Negative
Moment Mt Moment Moment
kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m
-23.6654 2.027E-05 0 -23.6654

Design Moment and Flexural Reinforcement for Moment, Mu3 & Tu

Design Design -Moment +Moment Minimum Required
-Moment +Moment Rebar Rebar Rebar Rebar
kN-m kN-m mm² mm² mm² mm²

Top (+2 Axis) -23.6654 192 0 192 115

Bottom (-2 Axis) 0 96 0 0 96

Shear Force and Reinforcement for Shear, Vu2 & Tu

11-06-2019

Shear Ve Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s

kN kN kN kN mm²/m
37.7971 0 37.7972 17.5661 355.05

Torsion Force and Torsion Reinforcement for Torsion, T u & VU2

Tu Vu Core b1 Core d1 Rebar Asvt /s
kN-m kN mm mm mm²/m
1.355E-05 29.0192 130 255 0
 11-06-2019

3.2.1Reinforcement details of Beam section

Design of Slab as per IS:456-2000:

Input Data:

Material :
Concrete Grade M 20
Reinforcement Steel Grade Fe 500

Dimensions:
Short Span : Lx: 4 m
Long Span : Ly: 4 m

Effective Cover: 20 mm (Cover should comply clause 26.4

of IS:456)
Boundary Condition: 3

Load :
Floor Finish Load w f: 1.5 kN/m2
Live Load wL: 2 kN/m2
Load Factor for BM: 1.5
Load Factor for SF: 1.5
 11-06-2019

Calculations:
Aspect ratio=Ly/Lx= 1
Slab designed as: Two Way Slab

Bending Moment Coefficients:

=
ax support 0.0370 For short span support moment.
ax span = 0.0280 For short span span moment.
=
ay support 0.037 For Long span support moment.
ay span = 0.028 For Long span span moment.

Depth assumed D = 125 mm OK

Selfweight wself =25xD/1000= 3.125 kN/m2 ( Density of concrete assumed 25 kN/m3)
Load intensity = w = wself+wf+wL= 6.625 kN/m2
Effective depth d= D - Eff. Cover= 105 mm
Factored Bending Moments=Factor x w x Coefficient x Lx 2
p
Mu/bd2 t req Ast req
% mm2/ m
Mux support= 4.504 kN m 0.409 0.096 101.10
Mux span= 3.409 kN m 0.309 0.072 76.04
Muy support= 4.504 kN m 0.409 0.096 101.10
Muy span= 3.409 kN m 0.309 0.072 76.04
 11-06-2019

Minimum Ast req=0.12xD/1000= 150 mm2 per meter

Reinforcement Provided:
Short Span Support: 8 Dia at 150 c/c Ast= 334.9 OK
Short Span Span: 8 Dia at 150 c/c Ast= 334.9 OK
Long Span Support: 8 Dia at 150 c/c Ast= 334.9 OK
Long Span Span: 8 Dia at 150 c/c Ast= 334.9 OK

Check for Deflection:

Basic L/d = 26 (Clause 23.2.1 of IS 456-2000)
Modification factor= 2 ( Figure 4 of IS 456-2000)
d req as per deflection control=Lx/(Basic L/d x Modification factor )= 67.31 mm
d required < d provided so, OK

Check for Shear:

Shear Force Vu= Factor x w x Lx/2= 17.390625 kN
Nominal Shear Stress=Vu/bd= 0.166 N/mm2
%reinforcement= 0.319 %
Beta= 7.279
tc= 0.398 N/mm2
k= 1.3 As per Clause 40.2.1.1 IS:456:2000
kxtc= 0.518 N/mm2 so, OK

Slab Design Summary

Slab Thickness (D) 125 mm
Reinforcement Main Reinforcement 8 mm φ 150 mm c/c
Distribution Reinforcement 8 mm φ 150 mm c/c
 11-06-2019

Design of Staircase:
DESIGN OF STAIRS
HT OF FLOOR LANDING = 5 6
RISER = 7
TREAD = 11
TREAD WIDTH AND LANDING = 3 6
WIDTH
LENGTH OF FLIGHT = 7 8.7
EFFECTIVE LENGTH OF FLIGHT = 11 3

HEIGHT = 1676.4 mm
SPAN = 3421.743 mm
TREAD WIDTH = 1066.8 mm
NO OF STEPS REQUIRED = 8.6
RISER HEIGHT = 177.8 mm
NO OF TREAD = 7.6
TREAD = 279.4 mm
Fck = 20 N/mm^2
Fy = 415 N/mm^2

TOTAL LENGTH = 3422 mm

THICKNESS OF SLAB = 171 mm

FINAL THICKNESS = 180

WEIGHT OF WAIST SLAB = 4.5
DEAD WEIGTH OF HORIZONTAL = 5.3
AREA
DEAD WEIGHT OF STEPS = 2.22

TOTAL DEAD WEIGHT = 7.56

WEIGHT OF FINISHING = 1.50
LIVE LOAD = 4.00

TOTAL LOAD = 15.28 kn/m

DESIGN

MOMENT = 22.36 KN-m

D = 90.01
 11-06-2019

REINFORCEMENT
MAIN BAR
AREA OF STEEL = 1321.458507 mm^2

min area of steel = 230.43 mm^2

provide main bars of

dia spacing provided spacing

12 90 91 pass

distribution bars

dia spacing provided spacing

8 200 233 pass

Design of Staircase
Slab Thickness (D) 180 mm
Reinforcement Main reinforcement 12 mm @100 mm c/c
Distribution Reinforcement 8 mm @ 200 mm c/c
 11-06-2019

Combine Footing Design

Concrete grade = 20 Mpa
Steel Fy = 500 Mpa
1
soil bearing capacity 6 = 200 kN/m^2
0
m
LOAD m GRID
3
P1 0
= 206 A-5 kN
P2 0 = 308 B-5 kN
m
COLUMN m
C1 LENGTH X 1 = 0.3 m
5
BREADTH Y m = 0.3 m
1
5
C2 LENGTH X m
= 0.3 m
BREADTH Y m = 0.3 m
1
CENTRE TO CENTRE SPACING OF COLUMNS
3
= 3.35 m
COLUMN HEIGHT TILL PLINTH 5 = 2 m

REQUIRED AREA OF FOOTING = 2.96 m^2

LENGTH = 4.00 m
BREADTH = 1.50 m
PROVIDED AREA = 6 OKAY m^2
C G X BAR = 2.01 m
The net upward pressure P = 128.50 G kN/m^2
pressure per meter length = 192.75 kN/m

Y Y

4.00 m

a b c
0.6 0.0 m 3.35 m 0.7 m 0.6
`
0.15 0.15 1.50
0.15 A B 0.15 X
-0.16 m 0.51 m
0. 0.6
 11-06-2019

P1 P2
309 kN 462 kN

O a

-0.01 m 3.35 m 0.7 m

x = 2.0 m

ALONG LONGITUDINAL DIRECTION

Shear Force

S F just to the lef = -1.425 kN

S F just to the rig = 310.43 kN
S F just to the lef = 126.71 kN
S F just to the rig = 335.3 kN
S F will be zero at distance "p" from A
its magnitude being given b = 1.61 m
MOMENTS
there fore maximum hogging B M M1 will occur at this section,
M1 = 249.97 kN-m
sagging bending moment at B = 41.65 kN-m
sagging bending moment at A = 0.01 kN-m

THICKNESS OF FOOTING BASED ON ONE WAY SHEAR at d

ASSUME
DEPTH OF FOOTING AREA OF STEEL % STEEL
600 1130.4 0.13
Tc = 0.29 N/mm2
Tv = -0.29 N/mm2
Vc = 261 kN
Vu = -262.80416 kN

Vc > Vu
okay
CHECKING FOR TWO WAY SHEAR

critical section for two way = 0.3

AROUND COLUMN C2
L2 = 0.9 m
B2 = 0.9 m
Vu = 357.915 KN
Ks = 0.5+BETA
1.5 > 1
TAKE K = 1
 11-06-2019

SHEAR STRENGTH OF CONCRET = 0.25 (SQRT (Fck))*2(L1+B1)

Vc = 402.49
Vc > Vu
OKAY

AROUND C1
L1 = 0.9
B1 = 0.9
Vu = 204.92
Vc = 402.49

Vc > Vu
OKAY

BENDING MOMENT

MAXIMUM POSITIVE BENDING MOM -249.97

= WITH EFFECTIVE DEPTH = 550

Required steel = -1014.14 mm^2

provide steel bar

dia spacing area
12 150 1130.4 OKAY

MAXIMUM NEGATIVE BENDING MOM = 41.65 KN-m

WITH EFFECTIVE DEPTH = 550

Required steel = 175.10 mm^2

provide steel bar

dia spacing area
12 150 1130.4 OKAY

TRANVERSE MOMENT DESIGN

OVERHANG IN TRANSVERSE DIRECTIO = 0.6 m

MAXIMUM NEGATIVE BENDING MOM = 23.13 kN-m

WITH EFFECTIVE DEPTH = 538
 11-06-2019

Required steel = 99.34 mm^2

provide steel bar

dia spacing area
12 200 565.2 OKAY

MIN ST = 0.12BD = 108 mm^2

Footing Design Summary

Size= 4m x 1.5 m Longitudinal Reinforcement Distribution Reinforcement
Continous Bar at Top 12 mm @150 mm c/c 8 mm @ 125 mm c/c
Continous bar at bottom 12 mm @ 150 mm c/c 12 mm @ 150 mm c/c
 11-06-2019

ISOLATED FOOTING DESIGN OF COLUMN B-5

rampl
DESIGN OF FOOTING B 5 column
P = 308 Kn
Mx = 5 kNm
My = 5 kNm
F.S = 1.5

P = 462 kN fck 20 N/mm2

50 N/mm
2
Mx = 7.5 kNm fy 0
My = 7.5 kNm
kN/m
SBC, safe = 200 2

Total load , W = 339 kN

Areq. = 1.70 m2
2.722
A prov. = 5 m2
Area
'OK'
Check for Bearing, (P/A) + (6*Mx/Lx
* Ly2) + (6*My/Lx2 * Ly)
137.8 Saf
pmax = 0 < 200 e
111.0 Saf
pmin = 9 750 e

Depth of footing at center, T1 600

Depth of footing at edge, T2 600

LENGTH OF FOOTING = 1.65 m

BREADTH OF FOOTING = 1.65 m

 11-06-2019

Along X - Along Y
axis - axis

kN.m per
Moment = 26 kN.m per m Moment = 31 m

d req. = 119 mm d req. = 129 mm

d d
available = 544 mm available = 532 mm

Mu /bd2 = 0.14 N/mm2 Mu /bd2 = 0.17 N/mm2

Ast req. = 720 mm2 Ast req. = 720 mm2

Dia. = 12 mm Dia. = 12 mm
Spacing
req. = 158 mm S req. = 158 mm
Spacing
prov. = 150 mm S prov. = 150 mm
Ast
Ast prov. = 754 mm2 prov. = 754 mm2
% prov. = 0.139 % Safe % prov. = 0.142 %

Check for
Check for Oneway Oneway
shear shear
'd' at critical
'd' at critical section = 544 mm section 532 mm
pt.at critical section = 0.14 % pt.at critical section 0.14 %
kN per
S.F., V = 11 kN per m S.F., V = 19 m
v  = 0.03 N/mm 2
v  = 0.05 N/mm2
c  = 0.28 N/mm2 c  = 0.29 N/mm2
Safe
Dia of the bar,  12 12
Required spacing 158 158
Provided spacing c/c 150 150

NO OF BARS 12 12

Check for Punching

shear
Eff. depth at d/2 from face of
column = 544 mm
 11-06-2019

Influence area for twoway shear 1.93 m2

Shear force = 260 kN
Perimeter of the footing @ critical
section = 3.58 m
Nominal shear stress,v = 0.20 N/mm2
ksc = 1.00
c =0.25 sqrt(fck)  = 1.12 N/mm2

Allowble punching shear stress =

ks*0.25 sqrt(fck) = 1.12 N/mm2
safe

Footing Design Summary

Size Longitudinal Reinforcement Transverse Reinforcement
1.65 m x 1.65 m 12 mm @150 mm c/c 12 mm @ 150 mm c/c

Conclusion
Reinforced concrete construction is common all over the world. It is extensively used for variety
of Structure such as building, bridges, dams, water tank, and stadium, tower and so on.
Experiences from past earthquake and extensive laboratory work have shown that a well-
designed and detailed concrete is suitable for earthquake resistant structure. Ductility and strength
required to resist major earthquake is achieved by following the recommendation made in the standard
code of practice for earthquake resistant design.
Detailing of steel reinforcement is important aspect of structural design. Poor structural
detailing lead to structural failure. Detailing play an important role in seismic resistant design. In seismic
resistant design, actual forces experienced by the structure are reduced and reliance is placed on ductility
of structure. And ductility can be achieved by detailing only. Thus; in addition to the design attention
should be paid on amount, location and arrangement of reinforcement to achieve ductility as well as
strength.
In earthquake resistant construction quality of materials and workmanship plays important role.
It has been observed that damage during earthquake are largely dependent on quality of materials and
workmanship. Hence, quality assurance is most important factor in good seismic behavior of structure.
 11-06-2019

NOTE:

The site supervisions & quality test of the different constructions materials of the
proposed building do not undertaken by the structural engineer (herein the Designer). Hence any
failure or error occurred with the building due to the non – implementation of the
recommendations made in this report and structural drawing. Or due to improper construction
will not be the responsibility of the Structural Engineer.
Also, the structural analysis has been completed on the assumptions that the proposed
building shall be constructed under the proper supervisions of skilled technical person.
Also, the structural engineer will not responsible for sub soil explorations at the site. The
foundation design has been completed only based on the condition of soil strata up to one- meter
depth at the site of the concerned building.

Designed By: GOPINATH CHAPAGAIN

NEC Reg. No: 12869 Civil “A”
M. Tech. in Structural Engineering
 11-06-2019

References

Books
1) Ashok K. Jain -R.C.C Limit State Design, Nem Chand & Bros, Roorkee, 2002
2) S.S. Bhavikati -Structural Analysis- II, Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd.

Codes
1) I.S. 456-2000 -Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete
2) I S. 456-1978 -Design Aids for Reinforced Concrete ( S.P.-16 )
3) I S 1893-2002 -Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design Structure
4) NBC 105:1994 -Seismic Design of Building in Nepal
5) NBC 1994 -FOR Ductile Detailing for RCC Structures Subjected to Seismic

Forces
6) I S 13920-1993 -Ductile Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures subjected to

Seismic forces
7) I S 875-1987 -Code of practice for Design Loads for Buildings and Structures

Part 1- Dead Loads

Part 2- Imposed Loads
11-06-2019