UNIT OUTLINE
Subject: Modern History Course: Number of Weeks: 5
NSW Stage 6 – Year 11 (20 hours total)
Unit title: Indenture System –
Reinvention of Slavery,
A Lost Chapter.
Key Concepts/ Big Ideas The importance of this learning
Power This unit of work is unique, its significance lies in its narrative. It is a historical
Slavery narrative of oppression and displacement of a people by those in power, it is a
Colonialism cultural and social narrative of Indians that became labourers of the Indenture
Commodity trade System from 1833-1920.
Diaspora Indians This unit examines the way British Colonial powers oppressed and ‘legally’
Race relations enslaved Indians following the abolition of slave trade, and utilised them in
Ethnic tensions furthering their venture of sugar trade to secure their position as the world’s leading
Slavery existence today economic power.
This unit of work aims to inform students of the ethical and moral wrongs of slavery,
the way societies in power create a superior/inferior paradox, the effects of
Colonialism on even the far reaches of the world, and effect of commodity and
trade in shaping various societies and countries.
strong ability in statistical data, which these lessons utilise alternatives for students who struggle to meet the
literacy. they will utilise to gauge websites to facilitate lesson’s outcomes. The lessons also contain
Students are asked to the scope of the group work, individual alternatives for gifted and talented students who
read from ebook Indenture System and learning and inform excel in the unit and require more educational
chapters, analyse track the movement of classroom stimulus.
written historical people during this time conversations.
perspectives, compare period. Students will also be Lessons also contain individual and group
and contrast different watching a documentary presentations, debates, class discussions, and role
versions of history, on YouTube. play. This is to facilitate both independent learning,
and create several Some students will as well as peer/collaborative learning as some
written pieces that create multimedia students perform better in this setting.
convey their ideas and presentations.
understanding of the Some lessons are designed around the teacher
unit’s content (MH11- delivering information in narrative form, e.g.
7; MH11-9). personal family history, providing information
The final assignment before facilitating whole class discussions, looking
for the unit is a written at pictures. These lessons are designed alongside
journal, which will lessons that require reading, writing and
require a display of interpreting historical data, for students that learn
strong skills in literacy via story-telling and hearing content information
by students. rather than reading content information. Weeks 2-4
are designed around a YouTube documentary.
activity.
2 An overview of How popular and successful was the Resources used by students during lesson:
The abolition different types of Sugar Trade?
of slave trade. histories, An overview of History of Indenture, Chapter 1:
Effects of this including Individual reading and teacher-led class Abolition of Slavery and the labour problem in the
on the narrative history, discussion – students access and read British Empire http://www.aapravasighat.org/
Empire’s biography, social Chapter 1 of ‘Abolition of Slavery and
Sugar Trade. and cultural the labour problem in the British The Abolition Project, ‘Arguments and
Indenture history. Empire” from link provided. Teacher Justifications’
http://abolition.e2bn.org/slavery_112.html
System The role of discuses with students and provides
formation and evidence, information on: BBC documentary – ‘Coolies: How the British
brief interpretation Key stakeholders of the British Reinvented Slavery’
description. and perspective Sugar Trade in the colonies (CSR https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxl4q_jfDPI
in the Australia).
construction of How popular Sugar Trade in the
historical 18th – 19th century was.
accounts Slavery driven sugar plantation
locations (refer to researched
maps).
Differentiation – teacher provides
summary sheet to students who have
reading disabilities or find that they do
not understand the chapter.
Individual activity – Students refer to
their maps of 19th century trade routes
and research for maps online depicting
sugar plantation locations in British
colonies to identify its widespread
popularity at the time.
End of Indenture
Lets recap!
Academic justification
This short essay is an academic justification and discussion of the unit of work created for Assignment 1. The unit of work was designed
for the Stage 6 Modern History Year 11 Module Investigating Modern History – The Nature of Modern History (NESA, 2017), with a content
focus on study 3. The Construction of Modern Histories. ‘The Indenture System 1833-1920’ was chosen as the example topic for the content
focus study 3. The Construction of Modern Histories, designed for a mixed ability Western Sydney classroom. Through an analysis of the Stage
6 Modern History syllabus for Year 11, this essay aims to justify how the unit of work, ‘The Indenture System 1833-1920’, fits within the
framework of the content focus study 3. The Construction of Modern Histories and aligns with my own professional beliefs about addressing the
The Stage 6 Modern History syllabus aims to enable students to “develop knowledge and understanding of the modern world, the skills
of critical analysis, and values and attitudes essential for an appreciation of the people, forces and ideas that have shaped the modern world”
(NESA, 2017, p 11). For this reason, the objectives of the syllabus are divided into 3 main target areas: ‘knowledge and understanding’, ‘skills’,
‘values and attributes’. The four outcomes for Investigating Modern History – The Nature of Modern History module are taken from the ‘skills’
objective of the syllabus: MH11-6, MH11-7, MH11-9, MH11-10. This suggests that at a practical, classroom level, units of work and lesson
plans designed for this module must display these skills. Teachers are to incorporate a working definition of these skills into their designs and
As a passionate historian and future history teacher, I believe that history is both subjective and objective, each has its merits in historical
investigation. I also believe in analysing, questioning, and contrasting different types of evidence and sources to support my historical
arguments. My professional beliefs have been incorporated in the unit of work, alongside the MH11-6 and MH11-7 skills outcomes, as they are
very similar. In the ‘Indenture System’ unit of work, MH11-6 and MH11-7 are displayed by incorporating maps, images, statistics, policy
documents, ebook chapters, NGO websites, BBC documentary, oral biographical accounts, and my own family history. These serve as “different
types of sources for evidence to support the historical argument” that the Indenture System was a reinvention of slavery and displaced many
Indians during the 19th century (NESA, 2017 p 28). To further emphasise MH11-7, the unit of work evaluates both the British Empire and
Indentured Labourers’ perspectives on the Indenture System, to foster discussions on “differing interpretations and representations of the past”
Collaborative work in the classroom has advantages for student learning. It promotes social interaction and teamwork, provides
opportunity for peer learning, and involves students utilising skills such as negotiation, critical thinking, conflict resolution, active listening, and
effective communication (Arnett, 2013; Kaendler, Wiedmann, Rummel & Spada, 2015; Strang, 2015). While collaborative learning has not
specifically been outlined for this module and its outcomes, due to my professional beliefs on its advantages I have incorporated it in the unit of
work, alongside the MH11-9 and MH11-10 skills outcomes. Collaborative learning strategies and MH11-9 and MH11-10 are displayed in class
discussions, group discussions, written work student work (100-200 words), student presentations, class debates, and the journal assignment. All
of these are also examples of formative assessment. Formative assessment is utilised as it allows for mapping of student learning throughout the
unit of work. The teacher is able to see the phases of learning, the stages of advancement in a student’s knowledge and skills (Frunza, 2014). The
teacher is also able to provide feedback to students in ‘real time’, and assist in the specific areas of learning that students may be struggling with
The initial design stages of the unit of work were influenced by the Australian Professional Standards For Teachers (AITSL, 2011)
“Standard 1 – know students and how they learn”, “Standard 3 – plan for and implement effective teaching and learning”, “Standard 4 – create
and maintain supportive and safe learning environments”, “Standard 5 – assess, provide feedback and report on student learning”; Melbourne
Declaration on Educational Goals for Young Australians (MCEETYA, 2008) “Goal 2 – All young Australians become successful learners,
confident and creative individuals, and active and informed citizens”; A Practical Guide to Teaching History in the Secondary School (Hunt,
2007); and ‘Lesson planning and the student teacher: re‐thinking the dominant model’ (John, 2006). These four texts allowed me to reflect on my
personal teaching philosophy and guide the designing of work week-by-week, activities chosen for specific lessons, and sequencing of the five
weeks of content to cater for a mixed ability class as equitably as professionally possible.
The unit of work spans over five weeks, designed for a mixed ability classroom in Western Sydney. The following are pedagogical
theories, classroom management strategies and lesson plan design models that inform my professional beliefs and were utilised to address
motivation and engagement for adolescent senior students in this assignment. Piaget’s stages of cognitive development, specifically the ‘formal
operations’ stage and Vygotsky’s sociocultural theories of ‘scaffolding’ and ‘zone proximal development’, have influenced the complexity of
weekly activities for this mixed ability class and the interactions between the teacher and students during class (Arnett, 2013). Strategies for
classroom management to create a positive learning experience were primarily from the Lyford’s model (De Nobile, Lyons & Arthur-Kelly,
2017). This model outlines the benefit of a positive ‘classroom climate’ and ‘classroom culture’. It assists in gaining student attention,
maintaining engagement, cues to facilitating group and whole-class discussions, transitioning between activities, and strategies for teachers to
develop effective student-teacher communication to assist in learning (De Nobile, Lyons & Arthur-Kelly, 2017). As a result of Piaget, Vygotsky,
and the Lyford’s model, each week includes the teacher assisting students during individual work, observing group work, providing feedback on
formative assessments, guiding discussions and providing extra assistance for students struggling with the content. A mixed ability class required
catering for a variety of situations and activities that were different each week, to be consistent in targeting classroom engagement and diverse
learning backgrounds.
My professional beliefs for addressing motivation and engagement issues in senior students are embedded within psychoeducational
approaches. Adler and Dreikurs’ ‘Goal theory’ and Glasser’s ‘Choice theory’ are two pedagogical theories widely utilised in Australian
classrooms (De Nobile, Lyons & Arthur-Kelly, 2017). Both theories identify the basic needs and goals of students that affect their behaviour and
outlines strategies to improve a student’s learning experience. Both theories are aimed at students with higher cognitive maturity, similar to
Piaget’s formal operations stage, and assert that young people are capable of logical and rational decision making when motivated by the right
In conclusion, the unit of work ‘The Indenture System 1833-1920’ fits firmly within the framework of the content focus study 3. The
Construction of Modern Histories and Stage 6 Modern History Year 11 Module Investigating Modern History – The Nature of Modern History.
This has been demonstrated through the use of relevant syllabus material, pedagogical theories, NSW policy documents, and secondary sources
implemented to inform the unit of work. The unit of work effectively addresses my own professional beliefs about addressing the curriculum and
Reference list
Arnett, J. (2013). Adolescence and emerging adulthood (5th ed.). Boston, USA: Pearson.
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (February 2011). Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. Retrieved from:
https://www.aitsl.edu.au/teach/standards
De Nobile, J., Lyons, G., & Arthur-Kelly, M. (2017). Positive Learning Environments: Creating and Maintaining Productive Classrooms. South
Frunza, V. (2014). Advantages and Barriers of Formative Assessment in the Teaching- learning Activity. Procedia – Social and Behavioural
Hunt, M. (2007). A Practical Guide to Teaching History in the Secondary School. New York, USA: Routledge.
John, P, D. (2006) Lesson planning and the student teacher: re‐thinking the dominant model. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(4), 483-498. Doi:
10.1080/00220270500363620
Kaendler, C., Wiedmann, M., Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2015). Teacher competencies for the implementation of collaborative learning in the
classroom: A framework and research review. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), 505-536. Retrieved from:
https://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/docview/1704026993?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=36155
Ladwig, J., & Gore, J. (2009). A classroom Practice Guide. Quality teaching in NSW public schools. Retrieved from: http://web1.muirfield-
h.schools.nsw.edu.au/technology/Programs/Template/Quality%20Teaching%20Guide.pdf
Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. (December 2008). Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals for
http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/National_Declaration_on_the_Educational_Goals_for_Young_Australians.pdf
NSW Education Standards Authority. (2017). Modern History Stage 6 Syllabus. Sydney, Australia: NSW Education Standards Authority.
Strang, D, K. (2015). Effectiveness of instructor-led collaborative learning in the classroom". Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education,