Pneumatological Missiology
At Scribd: Retreblement - A Systematic Apocatastasis &
Pneumatological Missiology
Our participatory imaginations gift us, integrally & relationally, unity,
beauty, goodness, freedom & truth, forming our dispositions (senses
& sensibilities) toward various ways of belonging, desiring, behaving,
transcending & believing, as expressed in our attitudes regarding &
personal commitments to others, the cosmos, God & even our own selves,
as told & retold in our stories.
One, who’s thus properly disposed & committed, can then imaginatively
engage others thru inspired storytelling, thereby, in turn, fostering others’
healthy participations, dispositions & commitments.
Such storytelling may, more or less, lend itself to a more rigorous cognitive
map-making, foundationally, which is to say, historically, exegetically,
scientifically, philosophically & metaphysically. Theologically, such
foundations can then systematically underwrite our ecclesiologies,
soteriologies, sacramentologies, sophiologies & eschatologies.
There are countless pastors, homilists & spiritual directors from diverse
faith traditions, who’ve articulated robustly pneumatological ecclesiologies,
radically inclusive soteriologies, profusely incarnational sacramentologies,
remarkably polydoxic sophiologies & universally efficacious eschatologies -
as awakened & enlivened by human solidarity & compassion & retold in
personal stories, thus implicitly grounded in their collective participatory
imaginations.
Some are better than others, when it comes to explicitly mapping such
dispositions, systematically & foundationally. Make no mistake, though, it
can be done, especially, it seems to me, by those who recognize certain
resonances between Franciscan, Scotist sensibilities & Eastern Orthodox
sophiological approaches.
This is to suggest that one shouldn't ever miss the concrete, dispositional,
participatory theophanic, theopoetic, theopoietic & theotic forests for the
abstract, propositional, cognitive theological, metaphysical trees. As it is,
robustly metaphysical descriptions & rigorous theological formulations
necessarily elude us, in principle, while vaguely semantical references &
broad heuristical contours guide us, in practice. Following Ignatius, we
must charitably presuppose the most orthodox interpretations of our
theological interlocutors, not reflexively & habitually construing
ambiguities & inadequate or inartful expressions against them.
To wit:
1) interpersonal propria
2) intimate idiomata
3) invitatory (ad intra ur-kenosis) relata
1) indwelling vestigia
2) imaginal uniqueness (essential nature of imago Dei)
3) intentional & incremental theosis (dynamical & progressive
intimaci-zation of secondary nature of kenotic similitudo Dei)