Tamper Resistant Bait stations must be Compliance with EPA PRN Determined by individual Compliance with EPA PRN Compliance with EPA PRN Bait stations should be Bait stations must be Not specified Not specified, but expected
tamper resistant, 94-7 tier 1 bait station auditor and specific 94-7 tier 1 bait station 94-7 tier 1 bait station tamper resistant secured in place and
positioned, anchored in sufficient. circumstances. sufficient. sufficient. through the use of tamper resistant.
place, locked, and labeled. screws, latches, locks,
or by other effective
means.
Device Spacing Placement of exterior Appropriately located Pest-monitoring programs Based on professional Must be made based 25 to 75 feet. 25-50 feet but based Described in facilities Devices are located in such
rodent monitoring devices shall include the placing of judgment and history and upon habitat and upon risk document pest a manner as to not
is based on the detailed detectors and traps in key assessment of potential potential access management plan. conatiminate product,
facility survey and activity locations to identify pest for infestation. In the packaging materials or
history as required by activity. absence of historical data, equipment. Must be placed
county or local regulatory initial spacing of 50 to 100 to achieve maximum
requirements. In absence feet. efficiency.
of an assessment devices
are placed in intervals of
50 to 100 feet.
Doors Not specified Not specified External doors, windows Devices should be placed Must be made based Within 6 feet of both Not specified All external windows, Devices are located in such
or ventilation openings on either side of doors upon habitat and sides of all entry doors, ventilation openings, a manner as to not
shall be designed to that lead to the exterior potential access except public access doors and other openings contaminate product,
minimize the potential for doors. shall be effectively sealed packaging materials or
entry of pests. when close and proofed equipment. Must be placed
against dust, insects and to achieve maximum
other pests. efficiency.
Service Frequency At Least monthly or more Determined by risk The detectors and traps Based on history and Weekly Monthly Monthly Described in facilities Minimum of monthly
often if activity dictates. assessment shall be inspected at a assessment of potential document pest inspections, and more
frequency intended to for infestation (monthly management plan. frequent as necessary
identify new pest activity. minimum) depending on risk factors
The results of inspections
shall be analyzed to
identify trends.
Interior Rodent
Control
Food Safety Audit Scheme Quick Reference Guide January 2018
Device Spacing In the absence of an Appropriately located Pest-monitoring programs Based on history and Trap locations should be 20 to 40 feet around The spacing is at Described in facilities Devices are located in such
assessment monitoring shall include the placing of assessment of potential recommended by the PCO interior perimeter of all consistent intervals document pest a manner as to not
devices are placed at detectors and traps in key for infestation based on potential access walls. Must have traps (typically 20-40ft., but management plan. contaminate product,
intervals of 20 to 40 feet locations to identify pest (recommended devices and knowledge of pest inside coolers at cold based upon risk) around packaging materials or
along exterior walls. activity. placed along exterior wall habits. storage and cooler the interior perimeter of equipment. Must be placed
Based on the detailed inspection aisle, white operations. Cold rooms at the building area and to achieve maximum
facility survey, interior paint 18 inches wide). In packing house and around interior perimeter efficiency.
monitoring devices are the absence of historical processors recommended of any walled in dry food
placed in sensitive areas data, initial spacing of 20 but left to auditor's storage, packaging or
towards the interior of to 40 feet. discretion to review risk. cooler areas. Inside of any
the facility. exterior wall and cooler
walls. Devices must also
be used in dry storage
areas, coolers, locker
rooms, and break areas.
Doors Both sides of doors that Not specified External doors, windows Devices should be placed Exterior opening Within 6 feet of all doors Mechanical stations All external windows, Devices are located in such
open to the exterior of or ventilation openings on either side of doors doorways must have traps leading to exterior. should be within 10 ft. of ventilation openings, a manner as to not
the facility. shall be designed to that lead to the exterior on both sides of the both sides of doors doors and other openings conatiminate product,
minimize the potential for interior side of the leading to the exterior, shall be effectively sealed packaging materials or
entry of pests. doorway. including dock doors. when close and proofed equipment. Must be placed
against dust, insects and to achieve maximum
other pests. efficiency.
Service Frequency At least weekly or as Determined by risk The detectors and traps Weekly Weekly, unless a Multi-catch traps and glue Twice per month. Described in facilities Minimum of monthly
otherwise defined in the assessment shall be inspected at a documented risk boards inspected every document pest inspections, and more
IPM program based on frequency intended to assessment is used with two weeks. Snap traps management plan. frequent as necessary
the detailed facility identify new pest activity. supporting trend data. inspected weekly. depending on risk factors
assessment. The results of inspections
shall be analyzed to
identify trends.
Pheromones
Food Safety Audit Scheme Quick Reference Guide January 2018
Placement Installed farther than 10 Avoid danger of insects Pest-monitoring programs According to Insect Light Traps shall be 10 feet from food contact Low voltage must not be Located so as not to Devices are located in such
feet from food contact being expelled from a fly- shall include the placing of Manufacturers suitably located and not surface, food or stored directly above present a contamination a manner as to not
surfaces, exposed killing extermination detectors and traps in key Instructions, maximize located over, adjacent to equipment. Not located exposed product. High risk to the product, contaminate product,
products, packaging, and device contaminating the locations to identify pest capture without or within 8 feet of food or above dock doors. voltage must not be packaging, containers or packaging materials or
raw materials in product. activity. interfering with food surfaces Distances do not apply in stored within 30 feet of processing equipment. equipment. Must be placed
processing or storage operations, being visible, hallways where product is exposed product or within to achieve maximum
areas. attracting insects to open only moving through. 10 feet of packaged efficiency.
food product. (30 ft from
exposed packaging
equipment)
Service Frequency Weekly basis during active Determined by risk The detectors and traps Based on findings & Weekly, unless a Monthly Devices must be cleaned Described in facilities Minimum of monthly
season and monthly basis assessment shall be inspected at a season, weekly documented risk and maintained on a document pest conrol inspections, and more
during colder seasons or frequency intended to recommended assessment is used with scheduled basis. Findings program frequent as necessary
as dictated by climate and identify new pest activity. supporting trend data. and seasonal depending on risk factors
activity rates. The results of inspections requirements dictate
shall be analyzed to inspection frequency.
identify trends.
Bulbs Changed at least annually Ensure glass bulbs are Not specified. Manufacturers Not specified. Changed annually Changed annually and Not specified Changed at least annually.
at the beginning of the protected, and included in specifications, in absence shatter protection must
active season or based on the site glass list. annually be in place
manufacturers
recommendation. Shatter-
resistant lights are used or
otherwise explained in
the facility's Glass, Brittle
Plastics, and Ceramics
Program.
Documentation
Food Safety Audit Scheme Quick Reference Guide January 2018
Contracts
Facility Contact Yes, facility name should yes or have appropriately Yes yes No No Designated pest control yes, scope must correlate No
be included as part of the trained staff operator (internal or an with pest management
Person
contract. outside service) plan.
Frequency of Yes, trained IPM yes Yes yes PCO service must be in yes There must be an yes, scope must correlate Minimum of monthly
personnel conduct an compliance with the established schedule or with pest management inspections, and more
Service
assessment of the facility contract and pest frequency of service for plan. frequent as necessary
at least annually. management policy. the management of the depending on risk factors
pest control program.
Service Description Description of contracted Clearly define and reflect Pest management Yes Written procedures Scope, types of pests and Service reports must be Describe methods and Supplier will have a
scope of services and how activities on the site. programs shall be required. frequency of visits available for review and responsibility for the documented pest control
they will be completed. A Clearly defined documented and shall up-to-date. It should development, program including types of
clearly defined scope of responsibilities for site identify target pests, and contain the chemical implementation and pests being
service details all management and address plans, methods, used, the concentration maintenance of the pest controlled/monitored, the
applicable pest contractor. Frequency of schedules, control and amount, the method management program. number and placement of
management activities inspections determined procedures and, where of application, location of Identify the pest, outline traps, and how all traps,
and responsbilities and by risk analysis. necessary, training application and targeted methods to eliminate bait stations, blue boards
dreves as the foudnation requirements. Programs pests. Trend reports pests when found. and light traps, etc. shall be
for an effective IPM shall include a list of should include all pest Validate tactics and verify labelled with date of
program. chemicals which are control devices inside and effectiveness inspection. Must have in-
approved for use in outside the facility. depth annual assessment
specified areas of the
establishment
Approved Materials List of approved All chemicals (including One is required Yes SDS for all chemicals must Not specified Must have list of One is required with Pesticides in use must be
chemicals, prior to use. those for pest be on file. approved pesticides and validated documentation documented and approved
List
management) must documentation is current (labels, SDS's, techincal for use by the relevant
adhere to the site for SDS information and sheets) authority. Safety Data
requirements for chemical sample labels. Sheets (SDS) and product
control (which includes a labels are available for all
formal list, approvals for chemicals used.
intended use, secure
storage and appropriately
trained and or certified
application person).
Licenses Copy of certification or All personnel at the site Licensed and approved by Copy of appropriate Company License, PCO Should be licensed Current business license, Licensed and approved by Licensed and approved Pest
registration document for (employees and the relevant local license and certificate certification(s) and liability insurance, certification for the relevant local Management Professional
each person who contractors) would be authority. kept at plant insurance must be on file. all persons who are authority
performs pest expected to have training, applying chemicals for
management services in certification and licencing pest control at the facility.
the facility, as required by required for their
regulation. Pest responsibilities.
management company
license. Current copy of
certificate of insurance.
Training Trained (minimum IPM Standard requires Training and qualified Annual training offered by Licenses for PCO Evidence of training if Pest control operators are Trained and qualified Trained and qualified
and Pest Biology State competent pest control operators. PMP for Plant Personnel sufficient. licenses not required. current with their operators operators. In countries
Certification) in the organisation - an required certifications and without certificaiton must
proper and safe use of important aspect of training, Proof of the demonstrate formal and
pest management competency is the required certifications are ongoing training.
materials by documented training/qualification they available to the site
training. Evidence of have received contact.
training is on file or
available electronically.
Trend Reports Verified GMP
Accurate training.
and complete Detailed records of Records of pesticide use Yes Activity and services must Yes Trend reports should The pest prevention Trend analysis are on file for
service records. Pest- inspections, shall be maintained to be tracked. include all pest control program shall reocrd pest all types of pest being
sighting log or reporting recommendations and show the type, quantity devices inside and outside sightings and trend the controlled/monitored.
system required including: actions taken shall be and concentrations used; the facility and activity frequency of pest activity
date, time, type of pest maintained. where, when and how found. Follow up actions to target pesticide
observed, action taken applied, and the target should be listed on the applications.
and name of reporting pest. service report.
personnel.
Corrective Actions Documented for The completion of Eradication measures All corrective actions Deficiencies must be Corrective actions Corrective actions Actions taken if pests are All corrective actions are
identified issues. corrective actions shall be shall be put in place documented addressed by the PCO or required on service implemented for trends present, identification of documented
demonstrated by immediately after management with reports. If actions require that are significant and root cause, document and
documented evidence evidence of infestation is corrective action and client action, the client listed on service report. implement corrective
that minimize the risk of reported. documented needs to acknowledge actions.
product contamination. The results of inspections issue.
shall be analyzed to
identify trends.
Food Safety Audit Scheme Quick Reference Guide January 2018
Reviews Annual assessment of the Results of trends shall be The results of inspections Monthly Survey, NPMA Not specified Not specified Service reports must be Not specified Service reports inclue a
facility to provide assessed on a regular shall be analyzed to Sample Risk Assessment, available for review and scheduled follow-up based
evaluation of IPM basis but as a minimum in identify trends. Annually full review up-to-date. Trends in on pest activity.
program. Review of the the event of an activity must be assessed
pest-sighting log at least infestation or annually. by the PCO or plant to
each quarter to identify This review shall include identify areas of
trends of pest activity. catch analysis from improvement in the pest
Corrective actions for trapping devices to control program.
identified issues are identify problem areas.
applied and documented
as complete; annual
assessment result, current
levels of pest activities
Website AIB Consolidated BRC Standards can be FSSC 22000 standards can NPMA standards are free NSF Standards can be The PrimusGFS GMP can ttps://www.merieuxnutris The SQF standards can be https://www.qmsaudits.co
Standards can be accessed for free at: be accessed for free at: for NPMA members: accessed for free at: be accessed for free at: ciences.com/us/services/f accessed for free at: m.au/standards/yum-
accessed for free at www.brcbookshop.com www.fssc22000.com https://npmapestworld.or http://www.nsf.org/servic http://www.primusgfs.co ood-safety-and- www.sqfi.com/documents brands/
http://www.aibonline.org g/public-policy/federal- es/by-industry/food- m/documents.aspx quality/audits-and-
/ advocacy/public- safety- inspections
health/food-safety/ quality/packaging/packagi
ng-audits
Contact Bill Steadman, Quality John Kukoly; info@fssc22000.c Andrew Bray, Vice Helen Gipple, Audit PrimusGFS primary Rena Pierami: LeAnn Chuboff- Dan Baldwin:
Manager, Food Safety john.kukoly@brcglobalsta President of Public Policy, Delivery Manager, contact for standard rena.pierami@mxns.com lchuboff@sqfi.com daniel.baldwin@yum.com
Services, GMP Inspection ndards.com
om abray@pestworld.org gippled@nsf.org questions is via email
Program; PrimusGFS@azzule.com
bsteadman@aibonline.or
g
Effective Date Jan. 2013 Jul. 2015 Dec. 2016 Oct. 2016 May. 2014 Aug. 2017 Jan. 2018 Jan. 2018 Jun. 2018
DISCLAIMER: This is a reference guide ONLY. Users are required to verify compliance with the above listed audit standards independently.