Ground Improvement
using Vibro Techniques
Case Histories from S.E. Asia
Dr.-Ing. V. R. Raju
Keller Foundations (S. E. Asia) Pte. Ltd.,
Singapore
Presented by
Keller Grundbau GmbH
Kaiserleistr. 44
D-63067 Offenbach
Tel. 069 / 80 51 - 0 Ground Improvement Conference,
Fax 069 / 80 51 - 244 Singapore 1998
E-mail Marketing@KellerGrundbau.com
www.KellerGrundbau.com Technical paper 10-56E
?
V. R. Raju
Keller Foundations (S. E. Asia) Pte. Ltd., Singapore
R. Wegner, D. Godenzie
Keller Grundbau GmbH, Overseas Division, Offenbach, Germany
ABSTRACT
The application of vibro techniques in improving cohesive and non cohesive soils is illustrated
using four recent and ongoing projects in the south east Asian region. Technical requirements
with regard to settlements, stability and reduction in liquefaction potential and the ground
improvement works proposed to meet these requirements are discussed.
1. INTRODUCTION
Countries in the S.E. Asian region have seen a tremendous growth in infrastructure and industrial
construction activity in the recent years. The presence of poor ground conditions ranging from
very loose sand deposits arising from reclamation works to very soft natural clay deposits has
required that the ground be improved before construction begins. Often these areas are subject
to seismic activity which require special consideration in the design.
This paper describes the application of deep vibro techniques in improving such soils. Firstly, the
technique of vibro compaction is briefly presented and is followed by case histories of an airport
project in Singapore and a port project in Indonesia. The second technique described is vibro
replacement (installation of stone columns) followed by case histories from a power plant project
in the Philippines and an earthworks project in Malaysia. The use of vibro replacement in liquefac-
tion prevention is illustrated using the power plant project in the Philippines.
2. VIBRO COMPACTION
Vibro compaction is a technique used to densify granular soils which are typically clean sands
(fines content generally less than 10 %) using the depth vibrator. The vibrations are produced by a
rotating eccentric weight which is driven by an electric motor mounted within the vibrator. The
Keller S 300 depth vibrator produces horizontal vibrations with very large amplitudes and centrifugal
forces. The vibratory energy is used to rearrange the particles of the sand in a denser state.
–1–
?
The vibrator with its motor running is lowered into the ground with the assistance of water jets.
Once the vibrator has reached the required depth, the water jets are turned off/reduced and the
vibrator is pulled back in short steps. At each step, the vibrator is held in position for a predeter-
mined period of time. During this period, the interparticle friction is temporarily reduced and the
sand particles are arranged in a denser state. The process is repeated until the required depth of
sand is compacted, leaving behind a column of compacted sand. The vibrator is then positioned at
the next compaction point and the process is repeated. For further details the reader is referred
to publications such as those by Moseley and Priebe [1].
2.1.1 Treatment
The Engineers design requires that the soft clay be improved by the installation of prefabricated
vertical drains and the placement of surcharge. Following consolidation of the clay layers, the
sand underneath the runway and taxiway areas is to be compacted to a depth of 10 m such that
the CPT test shows the following minimum tip resistances:
Runway area : 15 Mpa
Taxiway area : 12 Mpa
Figure 1 shows a plan drawing of the runway and taxiway areas and a cross section showing the
reclaimed sandfill, the underlying clay and the area to be densified.
Taxiway
80m
Compacted
Sand 10 m
Runway sandfill
4000m
Treatment area Clay
Figure1: Plan drawing of the runway and taxiway areas and a cross section showing reclaimed sand fill and
the area to be densified.
Keller has been awarded contracts to densify the sands over an area of approx. 500,000 sq.m. of
the runway and taxiway areas using vibro compaction. These works started in January 1997 and
are expected to be completed in February 1999.
–2–
?
Ground Improvement using Vibro Techniques · Case Histories from S.E. Asia
For the runway areas, a trial was carried out using three different equilateral triangular grid spacings
for the compaction points. Based on the results of the trial and taking into consideration factors
such as variations in soil conditions and the intention of minimizing recompaction, a grid spacing
of 2.5 m was chosen. The compaction process was monitored using automatic recorders. Settle-
ments following compaction of upto 1.0 m were recorded with typical values in the range of
0.7 m (7 % of depth of treatment).
A second trial was carried out to establish spacing and compaction sequence required to achieve
a CPT tip resistance of 12 Mpa in the taxiway area. Based on the results, a grid spacing of 3.0 m
triangular was chosen when working from existing ground level and a larger grid spacing used
when working from the top of a surcharged area.
Over 1.2 million cubic meters of sand underneath the runway and 2.5 million cubic meters of
sand underneath the taxiway have been compacted to date (August ‘98) by Keller.
2.1.2 Testing
The treatment area was divided into panels, each having an area of approx. 2,500 sq.m. Following
a period of 7 days after compaction, a CPT test was conducted in each panel. The tests were
conducted at locations as required by the Engineer and were typically at the centroid of the
triangle formed by three compaction points or at the midpoint between two compaction points.
Figure 2 shows typical CPT test results in a) uncompacted area b) post compaction test in taxi-
way area and c) post compaction test in runway area. In the areas where clay layers were found,
the required tip resistance cannot be achieved and the requirement had to be waived over the
thickness of the clay layer.
5 5 5
Depth [m]
Depth [m]
Depth [m]
10 10 10
15 15 15
Figure 2: Results of CPT tests in a) uncompacted area, b) taxiway area after compaction and
c) runway area after compaction
–3–
?
a) b)
Rock armour sea wall
Line of combi - wall
Breakwater
Reclaimed area
(not treated) "Offshore" treatment
Compacted
sand fill
Treatment area
2.2.1 Treatment
The requirement of the ground treatment works was to compact the dredged sand with in the
combi-wall to a relative density of 70 %. The total volume of sandfill is approx. 1,300,000 cub.m.
with treatment depths up to 25 m.
Trials were performed prior to commencement of production works to assess the spacing re-
quired for the compaction points. Using a Keller S 300 vibrator, different rectangular grid spacings
were tested and works started with 2.7 m centres initially. Following testing, the centres were
opened up to 3.0 m c/c and all ensuing works were carried out with this spacing.
All compaction works were carried out in acordance with standard procedure and were moni-
tored using automatic recorders (Type Keller M4). Induced settlements of over 10 % of the
–4–
?
Ground Improvement using Vibro Techniques · Case Histories from S.E. Asia
compaction depth have been recorded, with an average of 7 %. Two compaction units working
double shift - 6 days per week are being used to carry out the works.
Treatment to the off-shore sections, which are a 10 m wide strip along the toe of the wall, has
also been carried out from the top of the fill consisting 3 rows of compaction points.
2.2.2 Testing
Both pre and post CPT tests are performed at the rate of 1 test per 600 sq.m. to monitor the
effectiveness of the treatment. The requirement for compaction was a relative density of 70 %.
This was verified by determining the tip resistance corresponding to 70 % relative density using
the correlation of Schmertmann. Figure 4a shows the results of a CPT test before compaction.
Figure 4b shows a post compaction test result along with a curve for 70 % relative density according
to Schmertmann. The ground water table was at a depth of 3 m below ground level.
2 2
4 4
6 6
Depth [m]
Depth [m]
8 8
10 10
70% relative density acc.
12 12 to Schmertmann
14 14
16 16
Figure 4: Results of CPT tests; a) Precompaction-, b) Post compaction test result along with curve for
70 % relative density according to Schmertmann
3. VIBRO REPLACEMENT
Vibro replacement is a technique used to improve granular soils with high fines contents (>15 %)
and cohesive soils such as silts and clays. In this method columns made up of stone are installed
in the soft ground using the depth vibrator. The vibrator is used to first create a hole in the
ground which is then filled with coarse granular fill during withdrawal of the vibrator. The stone is
then laterally displaced into the soil following repenetration of the vibrator. In this manner a
column made up of well compacted stone fill with a diameter typically ranging between 800 mm
and 1,000 mm is installed in the ground.
–5–
?
Two methods of installation namely the ‘wet’ and ‘dry’ methods are available for the installation
of the columns. In the wet method water jets are used to create the hole and assist in penetra-
tion. In the dry method the hole is created by the vibratory energy and a pull down force. The
dry method is often required by the client because of its environmental friendliness (no dis-
charge water). For a more detailed description of the vibro replacement method, the reader is
referred to publications, such as those by Moseley and Priebe [1] and Raju et.al. [2] for further
details.
3.1.1 Treatment
A maximum peak ground acceleration (PGA) of 0.4 g is to be expected during possible seismic
events. This makes the loose to medium dense silty sand layer highly susceptible to liquefaction.
The presence of the soft clay layer at the surface posed problems with regard to slope stability.
Ground treatment was therefore required to:
1. Reduce the liquefaction potential in the sands and silts underlying the causeway area.
2. Provide effective drainage to the sands and silts to prevent build up of excess pore pressure
and hence the onset of liquefaction.
3. Increase the shear strength in the soft clay layers so as to assure adequate slope stability.
Stone columns installed using vibro replacement was selected to achieve the required ground
improvement since:
a. It forms in the soil large diameter columns of coarse, permeable material to act as drains
which allow immediate dissipation of excess pore pressures.
b. It compacts the in-situ sands, increasing their relative density. This is generally possible in
soils with fines content up to about 5 % to 8 %.
c. The columns made up of highly compacted granular material provide an overall gain in the
shear strength of the treated soil.
Figure 5 shows a cross section of the embankment along with the layout of the stone columns.
–6–
?
Ground Improvement using Vibro Techniques · Case Histories from S.E. Asia
Intake pipes
Jetty
Stone columns under
jetty approach embankment
Outfall pipes
30 m
Primary SC - grid
Second. SC - grid
Oil pipelines
Embankment
Figure 5: Schematic sketch showing jetty, pipelines and approach embankment to the power plant (top) and
a cross section of embankment (bottom)
–7–
?
soft silty
sandy clay
loose to
Depth (m)
medium
dense
10 silty sandy
15 MCD04,
02.03.-03.03.1998
dense to
very dense with SC
sandy w/o SC
CH80 / +01.0m CD ??
20
0 10 20 30 40 50
SPT - Value (N)
Figure 6: Plot showing existing in situ SPT values (MCD04), critical SPT values according to Seed (‘w/o SC’) and
critical SPT values after stone column treatment (‘with SC’) according to Priebe.
–8–
?
Ground Improvement using Vibro Techniques · Case Histories from S.E. Asia
The soil at site surface is extremely soft and provides only very low shear resistance which is
inadequate for slope stability. Reinforcing this layer by a close stone column grid for liquefaction
prevention provided a factor of safety for slope stability of only 0.8. It was therefore necessary to
install a secondary stone column grid at the centre of the primary grid. The depth of this second-
ary stone column grid however was only over the depth of the soft sandy clay layer and the
loose to medium dense sand layer down to a depth where the shear resistance was sufficient to
provide the required stability, which was in the range of 8.0 m. Based on this layout, the required
FOS of 1.05 under earthquake loading was met. Under normal static conditions, the FOS was in
the range of 2.5 to 3.5.
3.2.1 Treatment
The factor of safety against slope stability of the embankment on untreated ground was less than
1.0. To improve the shear resistance of the soft organic clay, stone columns were installed over
the full depth of the soft clay. A variety of stone column spacings were used depending on the
strength of the in-situ soil and embankment geometry. Figure 7 shows a cross section of the
embankment along with the zone of treatment using stone columns.
–9–
?
The extremely soft condition of the clay posed stability problems for the stone column installa-
tion equipment.Without a suitable platform, the equipment would simply sink into the soft ground.
To prepare a suitable working platform, the organic material on top was first cleared and a 1.0 m
thick sand platform was placed over the soft clay. In particularly soft areas where significant loss
of sand was expected, a 0.75 m thick cohesive fill layer was first placed by end dumping the mate-
rial and then the sand platform was placed on top.
+16 m
+13,5 m
+11 m
±0m
Stone columns
8m
Soft clay
Dense layers
80 m lateral extent
Figure 7: Cross section of the embankment showing zone of treatment using stone columns.
A combination of wet and dry methods was used for the installation. For the wet method sedi-
mentation ponds were required to assist in the general problem of mud handling normally asso-
ciated with these process. The dry method posed no problems with regard to environmental
considerations and work could proceed on a 24 hrs basis, uninterrupted.
A total of 165,000 linear meters of stone columns are to be installed over a period of 7 months.
These dry units working day and night and two wet units working day shift only have been used
to complete 130,000 lin.m. in about 5 months.
3.2.2 Monitoring
Embankment construction has commenced with fill heights of up to 6 m. To monitor the per-
formance of the ground, deep settlement gauges and inclinometers have been installed at regular
intervals. Preliminary results show settlements in the order of 10 to 15 cm (see figure 8) and
minimal lateral movements indicating satisfactory performance in terms of settlements and slope
stability.
– 10 –
?
Ground Improvement using Vibro Techniques · Case Histories from S.E. Asia
6
Settlement [mm] Height [m]
0
10 20 30 40 50 60
-20
-40
-60
-80
-100
-120
Time, DAY
4. CONCLUSIONS
Land reclamation works for airports and harbours by dredging sand results in large deposits of
loose sandfills with relative densities in the order of 35 to 40 %. Vibro compaction has proven to
be an effective method of compacting these sandfills so as to allow structures such as airport
runways, quaywalls etc. to be built. Primary advantages are the ability to consistently achieve a
high degree of densification, a depth of treatment of up to 50 m and mimimum disturbance to
neighbouring structures.
The risk of seismic events in countries such as the Philippines poses problems of liquefaction of
the natural sandy deposits. Vibro replacement is being used to densify and hence increase the
shear resistance and decrease the liquefaction potential of these soils.
Where the soils are made up of very soft silts and clays, even soils with undrained shear strength
values as low as 5 kPa. Vibro replacement has proven to be a reliable method for improving these
soils and allowing the construction of structures such as embankments. Safety against slope fail-
ure is assured and long term settlements minimised.
– 11 –
?
REFERENCES
2. Raju, V. R., Masud Alam, Paul Ha. “Vibro replacement - a technique for extensive ground
improvement works in very soft cohesive soils at the Shah Alam Expressway”,
Proc. of the 4th Geotech Colloqium, Darmstadt. Germany, 1997.
3. Seed, H. B. and Idriss, I. M. “Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential”.
J. of Soil Mech. and Found. Div. ASCE Vol. 97, 1971.
– 12 –