ABSTRACT
Background: Mental health problems, especially depression, have a major impact on the elderly.
Depression is a major contributor to the burden of disease globally which can cause suicide. This
study aimed to determine the factors that influence depression in the elderly.
Subjects and Method: This was an analytic observational study with a cross sectional design. It
was conducted from October to December 2018. A total of 200 elderly was selected by simple
random sampling. The dependent variable was depression. The independent variables were
income, history of chronic illness, family function, social interaction, social support, social
isolation, and loneliness. Data on depression was measured by Geriatric Depression Scale 15 (GDS-
15). The other data were collected by questionnaire and analyzed by a multiple logistic regression.
Results: The risk of depression in elderly increased with history of chronic illness (OR= 8.03; 95%
CI= 1.48 to 43.42; p= 0.016), social isolation (OR= 6.05; 95% CI= 1.41 to 25.98; p= 0.015), and
loneliness (OR= 7.14; 95% CI= 1.62 to 31.41; p= 0.009). It decreased with high income (OR= 0.14;
95% CI= 0.03 to 0.60; p= 0.008), strong family function (OR= 0.13; 95% CI= 0.02 to 0.67; p=
0.014), strong social interaction (OR= 0.11; 95% CI= 0.02 to 0.48; p= 0.003), and strong social
support (OR= 0.16; 95% CI= 0.04 to 0.65; p= 0.011).
Conclusion: The risk of depression in elderly increases with history of chronic illness, social
isolation, and loneliness. It decreases with high income, strong family function, strong social
interaction, and strong social support.
Keywords: depression, elderly, income, chronic illness, family function, social factors, loneliness
Correspondence:
Christiana Sri Wahyuningsih. Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Jl. Ir.
Sutami No. 36 A, Surakarta, Indonesia. Email:anachristi19@gmail.com. Mobile: +6281287783924
Social support was defined as assist- variables using the Chi-Square test and the
ance provided by people around the elderly calculation of Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% CI
who have a kinship relationship or do not and significance level p <0.05. Multivariate
have a kinship relationship, whether in the analysis using multiple logistic regression
form of emotional, instrumental, informa- analysis.
tive and friendship support that can pro- 7. Research Ethics
vide comfort, self-esteem and become a The ethics of this study included informed
mediator in solving problems for the consent, anonymity, confidentiality, and
elderly. ethical approval. The ethical clearance was
Social interaction was defined as an obtained from Research Ethics Committee,
interrelated relationship between indivi- Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas
duals, social groups, and society. Maret, Central Java, with number: 318/-
Social isolation was defined as a UN27.6/ KEPK/2018.
situation in which an individual experien-
ces a decline or even is totally unable to RESULTS
interact with other people so that a person's 1. Sample Characteristics
involvement in family and friends is Table 1 showed sample characteristics.
reduced. Table 1 showed that the elderly aged 60-74
Loneliness was defined as a feeling years were 148 (74%) and ages 75-90 years
that is less pleasant due to the lack of a were 52 (26%). Elderly men were 32 (16%)
good relationship with other people and and the female ones were 168 (84%). Most
tends to withdraw from the surrounding of the elderly have the last education of
environment. elementary school amounting to 103
5. Study Instruments (51.5%), no formal education of 42 (21%),
Family function was measured by junior high school of 36 (18%), senior high
Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection, school amounting to 10 (5%), and tertiary
and Resolve (APGAR) questionnaire. Social education of 9 (4.5%).
support questionnaires use The Social 2. BivariateAnalysis
Provisions Scale (SPS). The social isolation Table 2 showed the results of bivariate
questionnaire used the 6-item Lubben analysis. Table 2 showed that had history of
Social Network Scale questionnaire chronic disease (OR= 11.23; 95% CI= 4.83
(LSNS6-item). The lonely questionnaire –26.11; p<0.001), social isolation (OR=
uses the lonely scale of The De Jong 15.85; 95% CI= 7.09 - 35.43; p<0.001), and
Gierveld 6-item, as well as the depression loneliness (OR= 11.45; 95% CI= 5.29 -
questionnaire for elderly people using 24.79; p<0.001) increased the risk of
Geriatric Depression Scale 15 (GDS-15). depression.
6. Data Analysis High income (OR= 0.06; 95% CI=
Univariate analysis was carried out to 0.03 – 0.15; p<0.001), good family inter-
obtain the frequency distribution and the action (OR= 0.05; 95% CI= 0.02 – 0.12;
percentage of the characteristics of the p<0.001), and high social support (OR=
research subjects. Bivariate analysis was 0.07; 95% CI= 0.03 – 0.16; p<0.001)
performed to analyze the relationship reduced the risk of depression.
between independent and dependent
to elderly with poor family function (OR= disease were 8.03 times more likely to
0.13; 95% CI= 0.02 to 0.67; p= 0.014). experience depression than elderly who did
There was an effect of social interac- not have history of chronic disease (OR=
tion on elderly depression which was statis- 8.03; 95% CI= 1.48 to 43.42; p= 0.016).
tically significant. Elderly who had high There was an effect of social isolation
social interaction have a lower risk of on elderly depression which was statisti-
depression, which was 0.11 times compared cally significant. Elderly who experienced
to elderly with poor social interaction (OR= social isolation were6.05times more likely
0.11; 95% CI= 0.02 to 0.48; p= 0.003). to experience depression than elderly who
There was an effect of social support did not experience social isolation (OR=
on elderly depression which was statis- 6.05; 95% CI= 1.41 to 25.98; p= 0.015).
tically significant. Elderly who have high There was an effect of loneliness on
social support have a lower risk of depres- elderly depression which was statistically
sion, which was 0.16 times compared to significant. Elderly who experienced loneli-
elderly with low social support (OR= 0.16; ness more 7.14 times more likely to expe-
95% CI= 0.04 to 0.65; p= 0.011). rienced depression than elderly who did not
There was a significant effect of his- experience loneliness (OR= 7.14; 95% CI=
tory of chronic disease on elderly depres- 1.62 to 31.41; p= 0.009).
sion. Elderly who have history of chronic
Table 3. The results of multiple logistic regression
CI 95%
Elderly Depression OR p
Lower limit Upper limit
Income 0.14 0.03 0.60 0.008
History of chronic disease 8.03 1.48 43.42 0.016
Family function 0.13 0.02 0.67 0.014
Social interaction 0.11 0.02 0.48 0.003
Social support 0.16 0.04 0.65 0.011
Social isolation 6.05 1.41 25.98 0.015
Loneliness 7.14 1.62 31.41 0.009
N observation = 200
Log likelihood = -28.46
p<0.001
experience depression compared to elderly Elderly who have high social interaction
who did not have history of chronic disease. were less likely to experience depression
Chronic disease suffered by the elderly was than those who have low social interaction.
a significant risk factor for the occurrence Triple loss was often occurred in the
of depression in the elderly (Kulkarni et al., elderly, namely loss of role, barriers to
2015). Elderly people who have a high risk social contact, and reduced commitment
of chronic illness experienced depression by caused by the decreased social interaction
3.3 times higher than those who did not of the elderly both in quality and quantity.
have chronic diseases (Peltzer, 2013). Elderly who were always active and take
3. The effect of family function on part in many social activities were success-
depression among elderly ful elderly (Yuli, 2014). Feeling discomfort
This study showed that there was a with family, friends, or neighbors can also
significant effect of family function on lead to depression in elderly (Xu et al.,
depression among elderly. Elderly who 2018).
have a good family function have a lower 5. The effect of social support on
risk of depression than elderly with lack of depression among elderly
family function. Poor family support would This study showed that there was an effect
cause the elderly to feel lonely and the of social support on depression among
impact was depression (Tanner et al., elderly which was statistically significant.
2014). Social support that was part of Elderly who have high social support were
family functions could reduce the vulnera- less likely to experience depression than
bility to stressful incidence, such as chronic those who have low social support.
diseases in the elderly population (Chaves Another similar study stated that
et al., 2014). there was a significant relationship between
Family was the closest people and the social support and the level of depression.
main support system for the elderly in Family social support has a relationship
maintaining their health. The role of the that was opposite to the level of depression.
family included maintaining and caring for This mean that the higher the social
the elderly, maintaining and improving the support received, the lower the level of
mental status of the elderly, anticipating depression in the elderly. Social support
changes in socio-economic status and was related to the function of social
providing motivation and facilitating the relations throughout certain social roles
needs of spirituals for the elderly (Padila, (for example, romantic partners, family
2013). According to Yuli (2014), family members, friends, relations, etc.) (Parasari
function was a place to exchange between et al., 2015).
family members to fulfill the physical and There were six types of social
emotional needs of each individual. Good provisions, namely emotional attachment
family function was associated with good (feelings of intimacy, peace, and security),
mental health status as well (Cheng et al., social integration, recognition, dependable
2017). dependence, guidance and opportunities
4. The effect of social interaction on for nurturing. Everyone needed all six types
depression among elderly of social provisions, and if they missed one
This study showed that there was an effect of them, then people would experience
of social interaction on depression among social and/or emotional loneliness. This
elderly which was statistically significant.
loneliness could lead to depression (Chiu et the lives of the elderly when living
al., 2017). separately from their families, losing their
6. The effect of social isolation on spouses, losing their peers, and helpless-
depression among elderly ness to live independently. Loneliness in
This study showed that there was an effect the elderly was divided into emotional
of social isolation on depression among loneliness and social loneliness. Emotional
elderly which was statistically significant. loneliness was caused by a lack of emo-
Elderly who experienced social isolation tional connection with the family, while
were more likely to have depression than social loneliness was occurred because the
elderly who did not experience social isola- elderly did not have social networks
tion. Social isolation contributed signifi- (Eloranta et al., 2015).
cantly to sleep disorders and depression in Loneliness in the elderly can lead to
the elderly (Choi et al., 2015). stress that affected the work of the heart,
In addition, social isolation was which triggered cardiovascular disease and
related to the objective characteristics of a increased mortality in the elderly (Leigh-
situation and refered to the loss of Hunt et al., 2017). Increased stress due to
relationships with other people or in other loneliness can worsen the condition of
words if someone has a very small number being anxious, sad, depressed, and with
of social ties, it mean that she/he was drawing from the environment (Crewdson,
socially isolated. The impact of social 2016).
isolation was that it caused loneliness and
symptoms of depression (Ihenetu T, 2017). REFERENCES
7. The effect of loneliness on depress- Aryawangsa AAN, Ariastuti NLP (2016).
ion among elderly Prevalensi dan distribusi faktor risiko
This study showed that there was an effect depresi pada lansia di wilayah kerja
of loneliness on depression among elderly Puskesmas Tampaksiring I Kabupa-
which was statistically significant. Elderly ten Gianyar Bali 2015. Jurnal Intisari
who experienced loneliness were more Sains Medis. 7(1): 12-23. http://-
likely to have depression than elderly who isainsmedis.id/ojs/.
did not experience loneliness. Another Aylaz R, Aktürk Ü, Erci B, Öztürk H, Aslan
similar study stated that there was a signi- H (2012). Relationship between de-
ficant and positive relationship between pression and loneliness in elderly and
loneliness and depression in elderly (Aylaz examination of influential factors.
et al., 2012). Archives of Gerontology and Geria-
Loneliness occurred when someone trics, 55(3): 548–554. Doi: 10.1016/-
was not cared for or alienated by the people j.archger.2012.03.006.
around him/her, isolated from his/her Brown CR, Hambleton IR, Sobers-Gran-
environment, even no one else can be a num N, Hercules S M, Unwin N, Nigel
friend to share stories (Suadirman, 2011). HE, Murphy MM (2017). Social
Loneliness was the condition of someone Determinants of Depression and
who felt distant, alienated or excluded from Suicidal Behaviour in the Caribbean: a
his/her social environment and has an Systematic Review. BMC Public
impact on health (Rahmi, 2015). Loneliness Health, 17(1), 1–11. Doi : 10.1186/s12-
was a subjective complaint for the elderly 889-017-4371-z.
(Eloranta et al., 2015) and often threatened