To cite this article: Masayuki MURABAYASHI , Shigenori TANAKA & Yoichi TAKAHASHI (1975)
Thermal Conductivity and Heat Capacity of Zircaloy-2, −4 and Unalloyed Zirconium, Journal of
Nuclear Science and Technology, 12:10, 661-662, DOI: 10.1080/18811248.1975.9733170
k=aC,p, (1)
where k is the thermal conductivity (W/cm.K),
a , the thermal diffusivity (cm2/sec), C, the
0.30- specific heat capacity (J/g.K) and p the den-
7
?ccn sity of the sample (g/cmS). In this calcula-
-8
-I tion, correction was made on a to account
for finite pulse time and on both a and p
0.20- for thermal expansion.
T h e resulting data for the thermal con-
ductivity of zircaloy-2 and -4,upon treatment
by least-squares method, can be expressed
by the formulas :
For zircaloy-2 : k=0.138-3.90~ 10-6T
1 0: Present study, 2: Douglascs), 3: ToddcG) +1.184x 10-'T2
Fig. 2 Heat capacity of zirconium (W/cm.K) ( 2 )
were found to be very close to the corre- For zircaloy-4 : k=0.113+2.25x 10-'T
sponding values given in l i t e r a t ~ r e ( ~ ) ";(they
~' +0.725x 1 0 - T '
also agreed well with the present results for (W/cm.K). ( 3 )
unalloyed cast zirconium. T h e heat capaci-
ties of zircaloy-2 and -4 can thus be regarded We wish to thank Prof. T. Mukaibo, Prof.
as being equal to that of zirconium from 300 M. Kanno and Prof. Y. Mishima, of the Uni-
to 850K. versity of Tokyo, for their generous support
T h e determined thermal conductivities of of this work. T h e courtesy of Sumitomo
zircaloy-2, -4 and unalloyed zirconium are Metal Industries, Ltd. for providing us with
shown in Fig. 3, in which they are compared the zircaloy samples is also greatly appreci-
ated. Part of the experimental work was
performed by using the facility of the Re-
search Center for Nuclear Science and Tech-
nology, University of Tokyo.
-
-REFERENCES--
(1) MURABAYASHI, M., TAKAHASHI, Y., NAMBA,
S., MUKAIBO, T. : J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 6131,
128 (1969).
(2) TAKAHASHI, Y., MURABAYASHI, M. : ibid., 12
(33, 133 (1975).
'O 300 500 700 900 (3) TAKAHASHI, Y. : J. Nucl. Muter., 51, 17 (1974).
71K (4) WALTER,A.J., DELL,R.M., GILCHRIST, K.E.,
1 0 : Zirconium (Present study), 2: Zirconium
et al. : High Temp.-High Pressures, 4,439 (1972).
(Powell et uL(10)). 3 A : Zircaloy-2 (Present (5) DOUGLAS, T.B.: J . Res. Nut. Bur. Stand., A,
study), 4: Zircaloy-2 (Lucks et ul.(11)), 5 0 : 67A, 5, 403 (1963).
Zircaloy-4 (Present study) (6) TODD,S.S. : J . Amer. Chem. SOC.,72,2914 (1950).
Fig. 3 Thermal conductivity of zircaloy-2, (7) BROOKS, C.R., STANSBURY, E.E.: J. Nucl. Muter.,
-4, and zirconium 18, 233 (1966).
(8) DEEM,H.W., ELDRIDGE, E.A.: BMI-1644, (1963).
with the results of other workersclo)cll'.These (9) CASEY, D.N., YATES, B . : High Temp.-High
values of thermal conductivity were calculat- Pressures, 6, 33 (1974).
(lo) POWELL,R.W., TYE,R.P.: J. Less-Common
ed from the present results for thermal dif- Metals, 3, 202 (1961).
fusivity and heat capacity by using the well (11) LUCKS,C.F., DEEM,H.W. : BMI-1273, p. 7-9
established relationship (1958).
- 62 -