Anda di halaman 1dari 5

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/283094549

Measurement and analysis of magnetic field radiation near 132KV power


lines

Conference Paper · February 2015


DOI: 10.1109/APACE.2014.7043781

CITATIONS READS

0 120

2 authors:

Ali orozi Sougui Mohd Zarar Mohd Jenu


Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
7 PUBLICATIONS   0 CITATIONS    92 PUBLICATIONS   123 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

EMI of PCBs View project

Shielding Effectiveness of Enclosure with Apertures View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Ali orozi Sougui on 11 November 2015.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


2014 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Applied Electromagnetics (APACE) 8 - 10 December, 2014 at Johor Bahru, Johor,
Malaysia

Measurement and Analysis of Magnetic Field


Radiation Near 132KV Power Lines
Ali Orozi Sougui Prof. Dr. Mohd Zarar bin Mohd Jenu
Faculty of Electrical & Electronic Engineering Faculty of Electrical & Electronic Engineering
Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia Center for Electromagnetic Compatibility
Parit Raja, Malaysia Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
University of N’djamena , Chad Parit Raja, Malaysia
aliorozi@yahoo.com zarar@uthm.edu.my

Abstract - Nowadays, due to the rapid development of the copy machines, monitors and televisions which need to
countries, the High voltage lines are become inside the be studied according to [2].
cities. The magnetic radiation near high voltage
transmission lines is very important issue that both the This work has investigated, measured, and analyzed
researchers and the population are worry about. Many the EMF in the proximity of HVTL in Batu Pahat, Johor,
previous work states that, it is dangerous not only to people
Malaysia which has been selected as a physical example
but even to our fauna and flora. It causes cancer and some
other illness such as Leukemia. Hence, investigating the for studying purposes. Nonetheless, there is no general
magnetic field is tremendously important for the safety of agreement about the acceptable limited value of
the people. We had developed some equations and Maltlab environmental electromagnetic fields, or induction
Graphic User Interface for double circuit 132Kv vertical currents produced by these fields in human body. Since
configuration base on Bio-savart’s law and Maxwell’s late 1970s, when Wertheimer and Leeper suggested the
equations, to make easy for the researchers to calculate the existence of a connection between the presence of
magnetic field, It was applied the superposition method of overhead high transmission lines and certain illnesses
multiple conductors. Moreover, the measurement was done (leukemia and other types of cancer), there has been a
by using Electric and Magnetic Field Digital Exposure
great deal of discussion regarding the possible effects of
System to collect data in Johor, Malaysia. Based on our
results there are a good number of parameters that control electromagnetic fields on living beings [3]. Many works
the magnetic field; the current magnitude, the high of the tried to find whether childhood cancer may be linked to
conductor above the ground and the space between the magnetic fields from transmission power lines. Through
conductors. The correct phase arrangement can reduces the the discussion of the most important epidemiological
magnetic up to 91.5% and the increment of 8m in the height studies, the correlation is uncertain. As a conclusion,
will reduce 79% of magnetic emission. whether cancer is caused by magnetic fields or by
something else still needs further research. The health
Index Terms - Magnetic field, Matlab GUI, Human safety and environmental aspects of high voltage transmission
level.
lines have been divided into broad areas of studies.
I. INTRODUCTION
The exact calculation of these electromagnetic fields
requires the use of Maxwell’s equations. Only very
simple geometries in magnetic field by direct integration
Nowadays, the modern society is highly dependent
of Maxwell’s equations can be calculated as it is was first
on electricity, it is nearly impossible to survive in the
formulated.
future without this precious energy. During the last two
decades, industrialized countries are more concerned II. MAGNETIC FIELD CALCULATION
with an increase in EMF which has health hazards.
Electromagnetic field radiated from High Voltage
Transmission Lines (HVTLs) and electrical equipment The magnetic field produced by a power line is
may create low and weak electric current through our radiated in form of vectors and it is in circular form
bodies [1]. In crowded regions, as a result of town’s hence it is calculated as the vectorial sum of the magnetic
expansion during the last decades, HVTLs which were fields produced by each conductor’s current separately.
far from people are now close to the residential houses. The equations used in this work are simplified, to make
Mostly the previous investigations had shown no really easier the calculation of magnetic field. These formulas
serious effects on human health from the EMF due to can be readily used for the analytical calculation of the
HVTL, but recent studies have taken the opposite side. produced magnetic field at any point in the vicinity of the
Besides HVTLs, there are a good number of appliances power lines. An overhead line generates an electrostatic
that possibly radiate EMFs such as electric blankets,

978-1-4799-6603-5/14/$31.00 ©2014 IEEE 200


field in its vicinity because of the voltage at which it is , 0 (6)
energized and the charge in its conductors trapped in its
capacitance network. The intensity of the magnetic field Using Ampere’s circuital Law, the magnetic field
is proportional to the currents so that it varies with the intensity at the observation point J due to the current,
load condition. However, in HVTLs, the load factor
at point I in Fig. 3, is given by
seldom if ever is lower than 75% so that the load current
stays above 75% rated value most of the time. In
calculating the magnetic field, we will assume that the / (7)
current flowing is the rated full-load current [4].
Where:

A. DOUBLE CIRCUIT VERTICAL X is a unit vector in the x direction; Y is a unit vector in


CONFIGURATION OF 3 PHASE LINE the y direction. is the magnetic field intensity at
point J due to current at I.

The MATLAB program was developed using the For n conductors, /


formula used for the calculation of magnetic flux
density produced by overhead transmission line as
discussed by [5]. The magnetic field of a transmission
line is calculated using a two-dimensional approach is
used and assumes a flat uniform earth with non-
sagging uniform and parallel lines. The calculation
determines the magnitude and direction of B at any
point, J (coordinate, Xj, Yj). The x-z plane is the plane
of the earth’s surface; the transmission line is parallel
to the z-axis and intersects the x-y plane at the point I
(coordinate Xi, Yi).

Fig.2. Transmission Line Coordinate System.

Using the expression for magnetic flux density,


where the magnetic permeability of free space having
a numerical value of 4 10 / and using phasor
notations, the x-component of magnetic flux density is
given by:

2∑ (8)

For Eq.9 until Eq.23 refer to Fig. 1

Fig.1. Vertical Tower Configuration (9)

The K1, K2, K3, K4, K5 and K6 are the coordinates of


the conductors: (10)

, 2 (1)
(11)
, 1 (2)
(13)
, 0 (3)

(14)
, 2 (4)

, 1 (5) (15)

201
2 10
(16)
III. RESULT AND ANALYSIS
The x-component of the magnetic flux density is given In order to simplify the calculations and the analysis of
by: the magnetic field produced by the line, the model of an
assembly of horizontal conductors parallel to the axis is
2∑ (17) used [6][7]. This model is precise for the calculation of
the magnetic fields if, as usual, the conductor sag is small
in comparison to the span.

The measurements of the magnetic field near HVTL are


(18) taken at an incremental distance away from the
conductors and the measurement direct under the
conductor from the center of the span to the tower.
(19) Besides, to investigate when the magnetic field is at the
peak time, hence we had collected the data in one
position in middle of the span under the minimum
(20) clearance which is 11.36m. The magnetic field of HVLs
is generally affected by many variables [8] such as:
Magnitude of phase Current (I), Conductor Height (H),
(21) Conductor Configuration (Phase), Lateral Distance (X)
and space between the conductors (S). However, in this
project it has been focus on I, S, H, Phase and the J is
(22) fixed to 1m above the ground as suggested by IEEE.

The Variation of magnetic field depends on the gradual


(23) increment of the current. The peak of the magnetic is
15.5 mG when all the variables are fixed and the current
varying from 200 A to 1 KA. It is very clear that when
2 10 the flow of current in the conductor is increased, the
(24) magnetic will be increase accordingly. That shows the
magnetic field is directly proportional to the current.
Where and are not necessarily equal and hence the According to superposition method the summation of the
locus of value of is an ellipse in the x-y plane. The vectors will result as the resultant MF.
magnitudes of the major and semi-minor axes of the
ellipses are given by:

cos

1 cos

1 (25)

cos
Fig.3. Magnetic field when the current changes.
1 cos
The Figure 4 shows that when the height of the
conductor from the ground augment, hence the magnetic
1 (26) radiation decrease accordingly. It means, when we fixed
all the parameters and the height is variable, Hence, by
Where m=1, 2, 3, 4. The pair m=1, 3 and m=2, 4 the time the height increases, the radiation of the
correspond to two directions of the same axis. If m=1, 3 magnetic is greater due to the strength of the magnetic
corresponds to the semi-major axes, and if m=2, 4 near the conductor. This is show that the B is inversely
corresponds to the semi-minor axes and vice versa. The proportional to the height. Increasing the vertical
resultant magnetic flux density is given by: distance between the conductors and the edge of the
ROW (Right Of Way) will decrease MF (Magnetic
field); this can be done by increasing the height of the
(27)
support structures.

202
(a) (b)

Fig.6. Magnetic field for the phase


p angle (a) and the phase
arrangement (b) forf case abc-cba
Fig.4. Magnetic field when the height
h increases
IV. CONCL
LUSUION
When the space between the conducttors is increase, the
magnetic field is higher. Decreassing the distances In conclusion, the investigation of magnetic field
between individual phase conducctors can reduce radiation by HVTLs and analytical knowledge of
magnetic field. Because at any instantt in time the sum of electromagnetic field in ordeer to evaluate the magnetic
the currents in the individual phase conductors is zero, fields has been finalized. Thhe equations used here are
moving the conductors closer togetther improves their simplified and its can be utilize to calculate manually the
partial cancellation of each other’s MF.
M In other words, magnetic fields radiated in thet vicinity of the HVTLs.
the net MF produced by the closer conductors reduces The correct phase arrangemennt can reduces the magnetic
the MF level associated with the line. Placing the up to 91.5% and the incremeent of 8m in the height will
conductors closer together has practiical limits, however reduce 79% of magnetic emisssion.
the distance between the conductors must
m be sufficient to
maintain adequate electric code cleaarance at all times, ACKNOWLE
EDGMENT
and to assure utility employees’ safetty when working on Thoughtful gratitude is givenn to the Almighty. I would
energized lines. See the Fig. 5 like to appreciate and thannk my supervisor Prof.Dr.
Mohd Zarar for all the incessant supports, guidance and
help. Besides, my appreciaation goes to UTHM for
providing this project’s faciliities. Without forgetting the
help provided by Universiity of N’Djamena, Chad.
Finally, the motivation, encouuragement, love, patience &
financial support provided by my family are highly
appreciated.

REFERE
ENCES
[1] A. Qabazard, (2007).Survey of o electromagnetic field radiation
associated with power transmission lines in the state of Kuwait. In:
Electromagnetics in Advanceed Applications, ICEAA 2007.
International Conference, pp. 795-797.
Fig.5. Magnetic field when the space between the conductor [2] H. Ahmadi, S. Mohseni, & A. Akmal,
A Electromagnetic fields near
changes transmission lines - problems and solutions. Iranian Journal of
Environmental Health, Sciencee and Engineering, 7(2), (2010) pp.
The case of the three phase doubble circuit vertical 181-188.
configuration emits MF lesser magneetic field due to the [3] F. Munoz, J.A Aguado, F. Marrtin, J.J. Lopez, , A. Rodríguez, J.B.
García, A.R. Treitero, R. Molina.
M An intelligent computing
inter-cancellation of MF radiatedd by all the six
technique to estimate the maggnetic field generated by overhead
conductors. For the HVTL taken foor the measurement transmission lines using a hyybrid GA-Sx algorithm. Electrical
used the ABC-CBA conductor configguration. The phase Power and Energy Systems, 53, (2013) pp. 43-53.
angle has also effect on the magneticc field; the Fig. 6(a) [4] R. Begamudre, Extra Higgh Voltage A.C. Transmission
Engineering. New Age Internnational (P) Limited, Publishers,
shows the difference of the phase anngle adjustment. As
(2006), ISBN 9788122417920.
represented on Fig. 6 the angle are groouped in three pairs. [5] W.F. Horton, & S. Goldberg, Power Frequency Magnetic Fields
Hence, the 120, 0, 240 and 240, 0, 1220 are equal and has and Public Health. Tayloor & Francis, (1995), ISBN
the lowest MF value. 9780849394201.
[6] D. Deno, & L. Zaffanella, (1982).
( Field effects of overhead
transmission linesand stations,, in Transmission Line Reference
Book 345 kV and above. CA: Electric,
E 2nd edition.
[7] G. Filippopoulos & D. Tsanakaas, (2005). Analytical calculation of
the magnetic field producedd by electric power lines. IEEE
Transactions on Power Deliveryy, 20(2), pp. 1474-1482.
[8] I. Said, N.A. Rahman, H. Hussain,
H A. Farag & T. Juhana,.
Evaluation of magnetic field from
f different power transmission
line configurations in Malaysiaa. IEEE, 1, (2004), pp. 393-396.

View publication stats


203

Anda mungkin juga menyukai