Astrological Ceiling
Programs in 15th and 16th
Century Italy
NOAH DUBAY
Bowdoin College, Class of 2019
ABSTRACT
Along with the revival of ancient art, architecture, and philosophy that
accompanied the Humanist movement during the Italian Renaissance came
2
1
Anthony Grafton, Cardano’s Cosmos: The Worlds and Works of a Renaissance Astrologer
(Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999), 23-26.
___________________________________________________
BOWDOIN JOURNAL OF ART, 2018
3
colors, and he should spend most of his waking hours there and also sleep.”2
This is part of his greater claim that the heavens, real and painted, radiate
energy that is in turned absorbed by the viewer not only by looking, but by
simply being in their presence. While the heavens generally radiated positive
energy, one could change what kind of energy was being radiated depending
on how the heavens were depicted for apotropaic purposes. By using the
position of the stars and planets in one’s own geniture or those of another
important date, a patron could have the heavens painted as to send positive
energy specifically to themselves and their close friends and family and send
negative energy to those who were against the patron while they were in the
presence of the image. Since talismans work best when their subject is
unaware of their presence, painted programs of one’s horoscope tended to
be intentionally difficult to read, both to make its presence unknown and to
encourage looking from the viewers, which in turn led to more absorption of
the image’s energy.3 Using three astrological ceiling programs, the dome
above the altar of the Old Sacristy in San Lorenzo in Florence, the ceiling of
the Sala di Galatea in the Villa Farnesina in Rome, and the dome of the Chigi
Chapel in Santa Maria del Popolo in Rome, I aim to examine how
Renaissance astrological ceiling painting connects to the writings of Ficino
and to contemporary astrological practices at large.
The Old Sacristy in San Lorenzo was designed and built by architect
Filippo Brunelleschi for Cosimo de’ Medici, with construction largely
finished by 1428. As per Brunelleschi’s typical attention to detail, every
aspect of the Sacristy can be measured in simple shapes and proportions,
and many of the numbers of these proportions tie back to descriptions of the
2
Ficino 3.19, De vita libri tres, trans. Carol V. Kaske & John R. Clark (Binghamton: State
University of New York at Binghamton, 1989), 347.
3
Mary Quinlan-McGrath, Influences: Art, Optics, and Astrology in the Italian Renaissance
(Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2013), 165-168.
___________________________________________________
BOWDOIN JOURNAL OF ART, 2018
4
heavens included in the Bible.4 Above the altar, painted on the inside of the
dome, is a fresco that depicts the heavenly sphere (figure 3). The curving
lines of longitude and latitude in the fresco counteract the concavity of the
dome, creating the illusion of an actual sphere with twelve hours of the sky
visible. While there has yet to be a definitive answer as to who has painted
the fresco, Leon Battista Alberti, because of his involvement with the Medici
circle and because of his technical skills in illusionistic drawing, seems to be
the most likely to have done it, perhaps working with an assistant, though
the fresco is often attributed to Giuliano Pesello.5 It may seem odd now to
have an astrological-themed fresco in a Roman Catholic church, but it was
logical in context. Since late antiquity, the vault of a Christian church had
been seen as a coelum, the Latin word used to refer to ‘the sky’ or ‘the
heavens,’ and was decorated to appear as such, meaning that a fresco of the
night sky would not be out of place in the Old Sacristy.6 In addition to this,
Cosimo de’ Medici and those in his social circle had great knowledge in the
fields of hermetic Humanism and Neoplatonism, so it would be more than
reasonable for Cosimo to take advantage of the concept of the coelum to
request that such a fresco be painted in the Old Sacristy.7
Instead of containing a generic night sky, however, the artist of the
fresco chose to paint the constellations in specific positions relating to a
specific date, though scholars have disagreed on which one. In 1911, Aby
Warburg was the first to put forward this hypothesis, suggesting that the
date depicted was July 9, 1422, the date of the consecration of the main
4
Gabriel Blumenthal, “The Science of the Magi: The Old Sacristy of San Lorenzo and the
Medici,” Notes in the History of Art 6, no. 1 (1986): 1-3.
5
James Beck, “Leon Battista Alberti and the ‘Night Sky’ at San Lorenzo,” Artibus et Historiae
10, no. 19 (1989): 9-13.
6
Brown, Patricia Fortini, “Laetentur Caeli: The Council of Florence and the Astrological Fresco
in the Old Sacristy,” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 44 (1981): 177.
7
Blumenthal, “The Science of the Magi,” 1.
___________________________________________________
BOWDOIN JOURNAL OF ART, 2018
5
altar, however most scholars today believe that date is too early.8 The most
commonly accepted date currently is July 6, 1439 at noon, which is when the
Council of Florence concluded, nearly ending the East-West schism of the
Church,9 but modern Florentine scholars have suggested a date of July 4 or
5, 1442.10 Pushing aside the issue of which date the fresco represents, as well
of the issue of when exactly the fresco was painted, the inclusion of a specific
date ties back to astrological practices. Before making an important
decision, clients could ask astrologers to consult their genitures and figure
out which dates were favorable and which were not, and it is likely that this
could have played a role in the date depicted in the fresco.11 The fresco also
relates to Marsilio Ficino’s writings about the apotropaic power of the image
of one’s horoscope, and it is possible that Cosimo de’ Medici may have
wanted a specific date included in the fresco for good luck. While De vita
libri tres would not be published until 1489, Ficino was a Florentine and
connected to the Medici family, meaning vaults like the ones in the Old
Sacristy could have very well influenced his writings on the subject.12
The Villa Farnesina, known as the Villa Chigi until the Cardinal
Alessandro Farnese’s acquisition of the property in 1579,13 was
commissioned by Agostino Chigi, a Sienese banker who was considered the
richest man in Rome at this time, and built by the Sienese architect and
painter Baldassare Peruzzi in the years of 1506 to 1511.14 Chigi intended the
villa, which was built from a Vitruvian plan just outside the walls of Rome,
8
Jean Seznec. La Survivance des dieux antiques, trans. Barbara F. Sessions (Princeton: Princeton
University Press, 1953), 77.
9
Brown, “Laetentur Caeli,” 177.
10
Beck, “Leon Battista Alberti and the ‘Night Sky’ at San Lorenzo,” 14.
11
Grafton, Cardano’s Cosmos, 37.
12
Kaske, introduction to De vita libri tres, trans. Carol V. Kaske and John R. Clark (Binghamton:
State University of New York at Binghamton, 1989), 17-19.
13
Ingrid D. Rowland, “Render Unto Caesar the Things Which are Caesar’s: Humanism and the
Arts in the Patronage of Agostino Chigi,” Renaissance Quarterly 39, no. 4 (1986): 728.
14
Dieter Blume, “Picturing the Stars: Astrological Imagery in the Latin West,” in A Companion to
Astrology in the Renaissance, ed. Brendan Dooley (Leiden, Netherlands:
Brill, 2014), 380.
___________________________________________________
BOWDOIN JOURNAL OF ART, 2018
6
15
Rowland, “Render Unto Caesar the Things Which are Caesar’s,” 683.
16
Ibid., 692.
17
Ficino 3.19, De vita libri tres, 347.
18
Ficino 3.18, De vita libri tres, 333.
___________________________________________________
BOWDOIN JOURNAL OF ART, 2018
7
19
Blume, “Picturing the Stars,” 381.
20
Lippincott, Kristen. “Two Astrological Ceilings Reconsidered: The Sala di Galatea in the Villa
___________________________________________________
BOWDOIN JOURNAL OF ART, 2018
8
eleven constellations may have been chosen because they are the
paranatellonta, or rising constellations, associated with Virgo, which she
believes is Chigi’s Ascendant sign, or the zodiacal constellation that was
rising into the sky at the time of his birth.21 This, however, is dependent on
Chigi’s time of birth. Chigi’s time of birth, written by his father in the
Sienese baptistery registry, is listed as November 29, 1466 “a ore 21½,” or
“at 21½ hours,” which can mean different things depending on when one
begins counting the hours of the day.22 Quinlan-McGrath, citing the
astronomical and astrological timing as typically counting from midnight,
suggests Chigi’s time of birth was 9:30 PM, putting Chigi’s Ascendant sign
on the cusp of Virgo23, whereas Kristen Lippincott, citing the “local Sienese
tradition” of counting from the sunset of the previous day, suggests a time of
3:00 PM, putting Chigi’s Ascendant sign in the middle of Taurus.24 These
two times have led to two different interpretations of the two central panels
of the fresco. The panel on the left contains the constellation Perseus,
represented by Perseus right before he cuts off the head of Medusa,
accompanied by a personification of Fame blowing a horn to celebrate his
triumph over the gorgon. On the right, a nymph, either Helice or Cynosura,
driving a chariot represents the constellation of Ursa Major or Ursa Minor,
respectively. Using the time of birth of 9:30 PM, Quinlan-McGrath suggests
that these two panels represent the the meridian over Siena at the time of
Chigi’s birth, defined by two stars: Algol, the head of Medusa in Perseus, and
Cynosura, the North Star, found in Ursa Minor.25 Lippincott, however, using
Farnesina and the Sala del Mappamondo at Caprarola,” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld
Institutes 53 (1990): 92.
21
Mary Quinlan-McGrath, “The Villa Farnesina, Time-Telling Conventions and Renaissance
Astrological Practice,” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 58 (1995): 67-68.
22
Ingrid D. Rowland, “The Birth Date of Agostino Chigi: Documentary Proof,” Journal of the
Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 47 (1984): 192-193.
23
Mary Quinlan-McGrath, “The Villa Farnesina,” 61.
24
Lippincott, “Two Astrological Ceilings Reconsidered,” 193.
25
Mary Quinlan-McGrath, Influences, 176.
___________________________________________________
BOWDOIN JOURNAL OF ART, 2018
9
the 3:00 PM time of birth with Chigi’s Ascendant sign in Taurus, suggests
that the constellation Perseus is a paranatellonton of Taurus important to
Chigi, due to Perseus’s nobility.26
Regardless of the uncertainty of these particularities, the sheer
complexity of the vault’s program supports Ficino’s suggestion that a man
should construct a vaulted chamber and “spend most of his waking hours”
under his depiction of the heavens. Most of the information needed to
determine that the fresco represents Agostino Chigi’s geniture is not visually
apparent, but must be sought out, relating to Ficino’s remark that one
should not “simply look” at the painted heavens, but “reflect upon it in the
mind.”27 The use of a horoscope also ties back to Ficino’s ideas regarding the
apotropaic power of the stars and planets, and the intense complexity of the
vault’s program, which continues to stump scholars to this day, may relate to
Ficino’s assertion that a talisman is most powerful when its subject is not
aware of its presence. Due to the villa’s double purpose as a residence and
business office, many people would have stood under the vault of the Sala di
Galatea, pondering its meaning, and, depending on if they were a friend or a
foe, picking up the positive or negative energies being radiated by the
heavens in the fresco, and it is likely that Chigi had the fresco painted to
bring good luck to himself and his business.
Soon after the completion of the Villa Farnesina in 1511, work began
on Agostino Chigi’s mortuary chapel in Santa Maria del Popolo, designed by
Raphael Sanzio and completed in 1513, though decoration remained
unfinished in 1520, the year of Raphael and Chigi’s deaths, and was only
completed by the early 1550s.28 Inside the cupola of the dome, instead of a
fresco of the night sky like the one seen in the Old Sacristy in San Lorenzo,
26
Lippincott, “Two Astrological Ceilings Reconsidered,” 195.
27
Ficino 3.19, De vita libri tres, 347.
28
John Shearman, “The Chigi Chapel in S. Maria del Popolo,” Journal of the Warburg and
Courtauld Institutes 24, no. 3/4 (1961): 129-131.
___________________________________________________
BOWDOIN JOURNAL OF ART, 2018
10
29
Mary Quinlan-McGrath, Influences, 171-172.
30
Rowland, “Render Unto Caesar the Things Which are Caesar’s,” 705-706.
31
Bullard, Melissa Meriam, “The Inward Zodiac: A Development in Ficino’s Thought on
Astrology.” Renaissance Quarterly 43, no. 4 (1990): 703.
___________________________________________________
BOWDOIN JOURNAL OF ART, 2018
11
which was prohibited at the time.32 The incorporation of the Christian god
and the angels governing the planetary gods into the design can be read as
an attempt on Chigi and Raphael’s part to avoid falling into a similar trap.
However, this is not to imply that God and the guardian angels were
included only to appease the Church, but as a way for Chigi to “connect in
harmony ancient cosmology and the Christian faith” by showing that while
the planets influence man, God influences and reigns over the planets.33
These ideas are also in the text of the Urania, written in the 1470s by
Giovanni Pontano, whose intention in describing God’s power over the
planets was to “integrate the principles of astrology with Christian dogma.”34
Another interpretation of the incorporation of the pagan and the Christian,
set forth by John Shearman, one of the first scholars to study in the chapel
in detail, is that the cupola is the apex of the chapel’s decorative program,
with the zodiac representing the passage of time in eternity and the planets
and God as a schematic representation of “the Realm of the Soul after
Death.”35
In addition to the subject matter of the mosaic, the program’s
inclusion of the Ficinian colors green, blue, and gold, as well as the medium
of mosaic itself, relate back to De vita libri tres. In the third book, Ficino
mentions that the material used for making an image of the heavens
functions like “a mirror, smooth, concave, shining, and shaped like the
heavens” to receive “the celestial gift” of the heavens and in turn “gives it
again to someone who is in the vicinity.”36 It is very fitting, then, that Chigi
chose gilt mosaic tiles to be used for the cupola. Gilt mosaic tiles, made of
glass or crystal and backed with a film of gold, are highly reflective, meaning
32
Carol V. Kaske, “Marsilio Ficino and the Twelve Gods of the Zodiac.” Journal of the Warburg
and Courtauld Institutes 45 (1982): 201.
33
Blume, “Picturing the Stars,” 335.
34
Seznec, La Survivance des dieux antiques, 83.
35
Shearman, “The Chigi Chapel in S. Maria del Popolo,” 142.
36
Ficino 3.17, De vita libri tres, 333.
___________________________________________________
BOWDOIN JOURNAL OF ART, 2018
12
that the image of the heavens in the cupola not only metaphorically reflects
celestial power, but literally reflects the light cast upon it by the eight
windows in the drum of the dome. Lastly, Ficino’s idea that one should
“spend most of their waking hours and also sleep” under an image of the
heavens, which implies that one simply has to be in the presence of the
image to absorb its power, is present here as well.37 Though Chigi is dead,
his body, as well as the bodies of his descendants, lies underneath the cupola
of the chapel, eternally soaking up the metaphorical and literal rays of the
heavens for eternity.
These examples are not intended to represent the entirety of the
tradition of astrological programs, nor do they represent its beginning or its
end. The influence of Marsilio Ficino, the Medici family, and Agostino Chigi
in astrological programs continued for decades. Two notable examples
include the ceiling of the Sala dei Pontifecti in the Vatican, commissioned by
Pope Leo X and painted by Raphael in 1517, which follows the principles of
Ficino as well as the influence of Agostino Chigi, a friend to both Pope Leo X
and Raphael,38 and the wall of the Sala del Mappamondo, also called the
Sala del Cosmografia, located in the Palazzo Farnese in Caprarola,
completed in 1574 and commissioned by Cardinal Alessandro Farnese, the
same man who purchased Chigi’s villa and connected his palazzo to it.39 By
this point in the century, while the works of Ficino were likely still read and
referenced, the most prominent astrologer of the time was Girolamo
Cardano, who wrote and published work on a variety of subjects while he
was alive, as most Humanist scholars did, and whose entire body of work,
Opera omnia, was released in the early seventeenth century, years after his
death.40 The practice of astrology reaches into the present day, but with no
37
Ficino 3.19, De vita libri tres, 347.
38
Mary Quinlan-McGrath, Influences, 180.
39
Rowland, “Render Unto Caesar the Things Which are Caesar’s,” 728.
40
Grafton, Cardano’s Cosmos, 17.
___________________________________________________
BOWDOIN JOURNAL OF ART, 2018
13
near the magnitude and validity that it held during the Renaissance and in
antiquity. While it is still possible to create a geniture today, and some
people may wear jewelry of their star signs (though not with the talismanic
intent of Ficino’s writing), all that remains of the Humanist practice of
astrology in mainstream popular culture is a cursory blurb read online or in
the daily newspaper.
___________________________________________________
BOWDOIN JOURNAL OF ART, 2018
14
Bibliography
Beck, James. “Leon Battista Alberti and the ‘Night Sky’ at San Lorenzo.”
Artibus et Historiae 10, no. 19 (1989): 9-35.
Blume, Dieter. “Picturing the Stars: Astrological Imagery in the Latin West,”
in A Companion to Astrology in the Renaissance, edited by Brendan
Dooley, 333-398. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill, 2014.
Blumenthal, Gabriel. “The Science of the Magi: The Old Sacristy of San
Lorenzo and the Medici.” Notes in the History of Art 6, no. 1 (1986):
1-11.
Brown, Patricia Fortini. “Laetentur Caeli: The Council of Florence and the
Astrological Fresco in the Old Sacristy,” Journal of the Warburg and
Courtauld Institutes 44 (1981): 176-180.
Kaske, Carol V. “Marsilio Ficino and the Twelve Gods of the Zodiac.”
Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 45 (1982): 195-202.
Lippincott, Kristen. “Two Astrological Ceilings Reconsidered: The Sala di
Galatea in the Villa Farnesina and the Sala del Mappamondo at
Caprarola.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 53
(1990): 185-207.
___________________________________________________
BOWDOIN JOURNAL OF ART, 2018
15
Rowland, Ingrid D. “Render Unto Caesar the Things Which are Caesar’s:
Humanism and the Arts in the Patronage of Agostino Chigi.”
Renaissance Quarterly 39, no. 4 (1986): 673-730.
Shearman, John. “The Chigi Chapel in S. Maria del Popolo.” Journal of the
Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 24, no. 3/4 (1961): 129-160.
___________________________________________________
BOWDOIN JOURNAL OF ART, 2018
16
Illustrations
___________________________________________________
BOWDOIN JOURNAL OF ART, 2018
17
Figure 2: Aspect chart from Johannes Stöffler and Jacob Pflaum’s Almanach
nova plurimis annis venturis inserventia (Venice: Lucantonio Giunta,
1522), courtesy of Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Munich, Germany
___________________________________________________
BOWDOIN JOURNAL OF ART, 2018
18
Figure 3: Leon Battista Alberti (?), astrological fresco in Old Sacristy, late
1430s, San Lorenzo, Florence
___________________________________________________
BOWDOIN JOURNAL OF ART, 2018
19
___________________________________________________
BOWDOIN JOURNAL OF ART, 2018
20
Figure 5: Raphael Sanzio, cupola of Chigi Chapel, 1516, Santa Maria del
Popolo, Rome
___________________________________________________
BOWDOIN JOURNAL OF ART, 2018