Alona U. Guevarra
What lies beyond our limited plane of knowledge? There are questions of the
universe that we have the capability to ask but are too limited to answer. Abraham
Maslow, an American psychologist writes in his book A Theory of Human Motivation on
how man is a perpetually desiring being that will always crave for more despite what he
has been given. Although this is often interpreted and dissected with context to
materialism, it can apply to our thirst for ideas, knowledge and understanding despite
the limitations of the human self. Truly, the complexity of the human mind is often
putting ourselves in the context of the greater scheme of the universe. This is what the
short story Nesting in the Crevice of a Human Ribcage by Singaporean author Teo Hi
Firstly, what does existential paradox of the human mind entail? A paradox in
itself is defined by Merriam Webster Dictionary as “one (such that a person, situation or
action) having seemingly contradictory qualities or phrases.” Altheia Luna in her article
Veloso 2
uncertainty, insecurity and vulnerability. In the story, Nesting in the Crevice of a Human
Ribcage, the uncertainty, insecurity and vulnerability that Yan wants to make known is
the fear that humans feel towards our inevitable demise. In simpler terms, we are aware
of our lack of permanence. With every beginning, comes its respective ending and this
type of awareness is a prominent theme throughout the course of this story. “Humans
have such fleeting, physical lives, humans are so myopic and blind to the beyond.” This
is stated by Ne, the personified celestial body protagonist in the beginning of the story
the concept of the ephemeral existence of human beings, Ne shifts his stance on the
when it begins to explore the notion of the new star that often joins him for
human-watching. “...the new star insinuates it wishes it were human. The new star
free.” This is where the first paradox concept begins its slow unravelling. Teo Yi Yan
projects the fear of humans and seeks to present a contrast of two points of view in the
creation of his two characters: Ne and The Other Star. Ne makes it clear that it would
never want to be human as their life spans decrease so rapidly in perspective to his
own. This reflects the human desire for longevity and conquering death. This is seen
Veloso 3
constantly in our obsession with preserving our lives and avoiding dangerous situations
that could lead to major risks and consequences. As Philip Ball states in his article “The
God Quest: Why Humans Long for Immortality”: “We can’t stop craving eternity. The
strange thing about our dreams of immortality is that they persist even while so many of
the stories we tell about them end badly.” Take the famous series of fantasy novels
attempt to preserve his soul despite the morbidity of their process of creation in order to
conquer death. In the final installment, Harry Potter destroys all 7 horcruxes, including
the one contained within himself, and Voldemort is brought to retribution for his actions
through his own physical demise. Voldemort in this instance mirrors the stance of Ne.
There is an unpredictability in the manner of our death that pressures us with the need
to constantly extend our lifespans. This is mirrored in the importance of The Deathly
Hallows in the wizarding world where it is made clear that the wizard or witch that
possesses all three hallows: the Elder Wand, the Resurrection Stone and the Cloak of
exhibiting a parallelism with the third Peverell brother in the short story included in the
The Deathly Hallows entitled The Tale of the Three Brothers. This is seen when Harry
meets Voldemort in the Forbidden Forest as he musters the strength to face death
his life as its equal. Although we often crave for the permanence of youth and
constantly fear of the unknowing event of our inevitable passing, the very thing that
Veloso 4
makes life so precious and valuable is the fact that it will eventually conclude in total
finality. Our friendships, ambitions and opportunities are all given meaning because of
the awareness we possess of their eventual end. It is this projected meaning that makes
human beings vulnerable, insecure, but in turn makes us unique,complex and dynamic
creatures. This is what the other star seeks to make known to Ne: “...burning hard,
burning bright;... being free.” The very thing humans fear is what makes them so
enviable. Our longing for immortality and longevity devalues the nature of the journey of
living. The complexity of our souls relies on the inevitability of a single, unified
Secondly, through the personification of the two main characters: Ne and The
Other Star does Teo Hi Yan seek to give clarity on the stance of the issue on the fear of
death. He takes a liking to parallelisms as the stars in his story go human-gazing similar
to how humans often go stargazing. This mirroring shows the longing for humans to
understand the beyond as with the stars in the story that seek to understand what lies
beyond the “life” of their celestial bodies. Moreover, he seeks to parallel the “burning
celestial bodies. He seeks to extend the idea that we are ourselves are the humanized
versions of stars. We may wish to exist as the stars do, burnin for hundreds of years,
no heartbreak. However, Yan seeks to expand on the fact that this pain and uncertainty
that are often seen as the trials and tribulations of being human are the primary factors
Veloso 5
that allows us to feel elation, triumph and fulfillment in the first place. There can never
be success without failure. There can never be relief without pain. We may never hope
to experience happiness without the prior emotional turmoil of the dreaded stings of
sadness. Thus, we can never experience life without knowing and understanding the
concept of death. This is the paradox that Yan seeks to paint in the creation of two of
his main characters who so vividly contrast in ideals. One who despises the vulnerability
of human death and one who embraces it as a whole. These concepts are supported
greatly by the lines “Their ability to inscribe meaning and significance to everything they
touch, even when the waves and tides of the universe and time and space will erase
everything they have touched...But what if, what if they have just a good a spell to burn
bright and fast?...What if, of all unspeakables, They have an even better existence?”
This is the second paradox that Yan longs to emulate through his piece. Despite the
destruction that will wreak havoc upon the creations of our permanence in structuralized
systems, infrastructures and generations, we still create, we still explore, we still love
and yearn to do more. Ne realizes this and establishes this idea in the following lines
when he ponders on the loss of companionship of The New Star: “Ne knows that once
the star no longer remains a new star, it will depart at some point, and ne will be
reacquainted with loneliness, that loneliness will weave itself back into nir’s
existence...For now the new star is here. Providing attention, grabbing luminosity,
rotating at the same velocity. … That Ne will burn singularly and wholly without
reservation for this new star.” In this display, the nature of this star emulates the nature
Veloso 6
of being human: knowing the end will come, but seeking to find refuge in the present
forth the projected insecurities and vulnerabilities of man on the stances of death and
makes known the paradoxes of human nature that construct our decisions, choices and
ambitions. It is a story that requires more than one read to fully understand, dissect and
interpret as Yan combines layer upon layer of existential concepts and questions
regarding philosophical and social topics. Despite its tendency to be slightly confusing
and vague including the often twisting and turning nature of the story with lack of proper
transitioning, it is all-in all a reflective story that brings to light substantial concepts in a
unique manner. Although the inclusion of proper transitioning, structure and flow could
be necessary for future works, the vague instances and unclear messages may be
intentionally done in order for the work to remain open to interpretation and easy for
dissection- a feat that makes this work notable in the first place. Through the paradoxes
he illustrates of the value that humans construct from the fact of their inevitable demise,
Yan uses the metaphor of human-gazing to concretize his point. We are amazing feats
meant to be looked upon in awe, burning brightly, burning freely, loving deeply, living
rapidly until we all meet our inevitable passing. Through this passing, does the journey
of our years have value, and this in turn makes us far brighter than any existing stars.
Veloso 7
Sources:
1. Ball, Philip. "The God quest: why humans long for immortality".
Newstatesman.com, 2015,
https://www.newstatesman.com/culture/2015/07/god-quest-why-humans-long-im
mortality.
ttps://lonerwolf.com/examples-of-paradox/
lonerwolf.com. h
3. Paradox.” Merriam-webster.com,
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/paradox
4. Yan, Teo Hi. “Nesting in the Crevice of a Human Ribcage.” The First Five.