At the age 18, Marian found out that she was pregnant. She
insured her own life and named her unborn child as her sole
beneficiary. When she was already due to give birth, she and
her boyfriend Pietro, the father of her unborn child, were
kidnapped in a resort in Bataan where they were vacationing.
The military gave chase and after one week, they were found
in abandoned hut in Cavite. Marian and Pietro were hacked
with bolos. Marian and the baby she delivered were both found
dead, with the baby’s umbilical cord already cut. Pietro
survived. Can Marian’s baby be the beneficiary of the
insurance taken on the life of the mother? (5%)
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Marian’s baby can be a beneficiary of the insurance policy.
An unborn child shall be considered born for all purposes that are
favorable to it, provided, it be born later in accordance with the Civil
Code.
In this case, the child is considered born, since its umbilical cord is
already cut when found. An entitlement to the insurance proceeds is an
incidence that is favorable to the child.
II.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
The marriage of Roderick and Faye was not valid because of the
absence of a marriage license.
It is true that the fact that a man and a woman live continuously
and exclusively as husband and wife for at least five years is one of the
exceptions from the requirement of marriage license, but the same is
not without a condition and that condition is that both of them must
have no legal impediment to marry each other.
III.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
The marriage between Julian and Thelma is valid.
IV.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
The divorce obtained in Canada does not affect the validity of the
marriage between Sonny and Lulu in the Philippines.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
As far as the Philippine law is concern, the marriage between Sonny
and Auring is void.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Lulu was not correct.
V.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
False. The statement falls short of the provision of Article 26 of the
Family Code because it only requires a Filipino spouse to prove that his
or her foreign spouse must obtain a divorce abroad when not only that
is required but also that the Filipino spouse must prove that the foreign
spouse is capacitated to re-marry.
VI.
You are a Family Court judge and before you is a petition for
the Declaration of Nullity of Marriage (under Article 36 of the
Family Code) filed by Maria against Neil. Maria claims that Neil
is psychologically incapacitated to comply with the essential
obligations of marriage because Neil is a drunkard, a
womanizer, a gambler, and a mama’s boy-traits that she never
knew or saw when Neil was courting her. Although summoned,
Neil did not answer Maria’s petition and never appeared in
court.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
OR
C. If the husband discovers after the marriage that his wife has
been a prostitute before they got married; (5%)
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
A. If the wife discovers after the marriage that her husband has AIDS,
she may file a petition for annulment of marriage. AIDS is
characterized as sexually transmitted disease which under the Family
Code, is a ground for annulment of marriage.
B. If the wife went abroad as a nurse and refuses to come home after
the expiration of her 3-year contract, the husband may file a petition
for legal separation. Refusal to come home without justifiable cause or
reason for more than one (1) year can be considered as abandonment
which under the Family Code, is a ground for legal separation.
C. If the husband discovers after the marriage that his wife has been a
prostitute before they got married, none among the three remedies is
available for him. Misrepresentation or concealment as to chastity is
not a ground for annulment of marriage.
D. If the husband has a serious affair with his secretary and refuses to
stop notwithstanding advice from relatives and friends, the aggrieved
wife may file a petition for legal separation. Serious affair with the
secretary can be considered as sexual infidelity which under the Family
Code, is a ground for legal separation.
E. If the husband beats up his wife every time he comes home drunk,
the aggrieved wife may file a petition for legal separation. Repeated
physical violence or grossly abusive conduct directed against the
aggrieved spouse is a ground for legal separation.
VII.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
A. The marriage of Facundo and Querica is not valid by reason of the
absence of a marriage license.
The Family Code provides that the exemption from the requirement of
a marriage license requires that the man and woman must have lived
together as husband and wife for at least five years without any legal
impediment to marry each other.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
The petition filed by Sotero is meritorious.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(a) A marriage between two 19-year olds without parental consent is
voidable. Being both 19 years old, the consent of the parties is not full
without the consent of their parents. The consent of the parents of the
parties to the marriage is indispensable for its validity.
(d) If the marriage before a notary public is valid under Hongkong Law,
then the marriage is also valid in the Philippines. Otherwise, the
marriage that is not valid under Hongkong law will not also be valid in
the Philippines.
(e) A marriage solemnized by a town mayor three towns away from his
jurisdiction is valid. Under the Local Government Code, the authority of
a mayor to solemnize marriages is not restricted within his
municipality. And even assuming that his authority is restricted within
his municipality, such marriage will nevertheless, be valid because
solemnizing the marriage outside said municipality is a mere
irregularity which does not affect the validity of marriage.
IX.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
The two (2) grounds for the dismissal of the case are prescription and
mutual guilt.
The Civil Code provides that an action for legal separation shall be filed
within five (5) years from the time of the occurrence of the cause. An
action filed beyond that period is deemed prescribed. Considering that
Saul filed an action for legal separation against Cecile only after six (6)
years from the incident, such is barred by prescription.
Under the same Code, mutual guilt is also one of the grounds for the
denial of petition for legal separation. In the instant case, there is
mutual guilt since Saul had an adulterous relation with another woman
at the time when Cecile shot him when she caught them in flagrante.