BUS320 ASSESSMENT TASK3
Suggested Structure Task 3 Case Study Report (Harvard style/ 3000 words +-10%)
Criteria
Executive Summary and
Introduction
Background and ethical
question given
Corporate Governance, CSR,
CSV and Corporate Social
Performance
Stakeholder Analysis
Diversity and Inclusion
Corporate Governance
Discussion based on ASX 2010
Principles and recommendations
Ethical analysis
Conclusion, Recommendations.
Literature support and
argument, logical and engaging.
Critical evaluation and logical
development of arguments
supported by relevant credible
sources and appropriate ref.
style.
Comments
Ex Summ = Purpose, Key findings and
Recommendations.
Introduction = Authorisation and Purpose, Scope,
Limitations (if any) and method.
You have provided an informative background
that captures the reader’s interest.
Good balance of news references that explains
the topic.
Sound use of Corporate Governance Theoretical
views.
The corporate social performance cube has been
used to demonstrate that we all do good and bad
things. The issue in the social environment axis
has been modified.
Porter and Kramer’s Creating Shared Value
concept has been discussed.
Use of CSR to link to the next section.
You have used the 5 stakeholder analysis
questions as depicted in the text. Analysis using
the 5 questions is comprehensive.
You have discussed issues relative to the
importance of diversity and inclusion.
You have identified the level of Board
Independence, board formation and diversity.
Your analysis of the corporation’s actions using
ASX Principles and recommendations is
comprehensive.
You have analysed the ethical question from a
normative (consequentialist / non-
consequentialist) perspective
You have analysed the ethical question from the
perspective of justice and economic distribution
using libertarian and Rawls approaches.
Which factors constitute justice? You have
discussed this issue.
Conclude and state 3 or 4 action driven and well-
reasoned recommendations
Your use of the literature is pertinent and provides
support for your ideas (at least 10 refereed, peer
reviewed articles and sufficient news articles,
videos etc.)
Your writing style is well developed.
Your argument is good and logical
The referencing style in text and in the LoR is
appropriate and follows Harvard referencing
style.