Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region VI- Western Visayas
Schools Division Office of Kabankalan City
INAPOY NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Bryg. Inapoy, Kabankalan City, Negros Occidental

Lesson Plan in Discipline and Ideas in the Applied Sciences

I. Objectives:
At the end of the lesson learners must:
Distinguish the appropriate communication media channel(s) to use in different setting
and situations (HUMSS_DIASS 12-IIa-41)

II. Subject Matter

Topic : Communication media channel
Reference: Discipline and Idea in the Applied Sciences pp. 150-151
Materials: visual aids
III. Procedures
A. Pre-Activity
Checking of attendance
Review: What are the methods of communication?
What the following setting of communication?
B. Activity Proper
 Categorized me. (mass media and new media and social media)

 Watch a video clip

C. Analysis
1. What forms of social media do you mostly use?
2. Why do you usually use each of them?
3. Do you find them effective in delivering the message you want to send? Why?
D. Abstraction
Using the graphic organizer, the learners will put the communication channels

E. Application
- Demonstrate the roles and function of being a competent communicators and
journalist through a role play. (the learners will be group into two. Each group will
pick a piece of paper that contain a situation.)
 Delivering a weather forecast
 Sharing a healthy diet tips
IV. Evaluation
 Use the graphic organizer show the functions and roles of journalist and communication in
the society.
V. Assignment : ½ crosswise
What do you think will happen if there will be no journalist in our country?

Fairness is often codified into rules — in games, in classroom management, in institutional

policies and procedures, in the marketplace, and in our legal system. It probably all begins with
parental instructions on how to play and share toys with others, but it continues throughout life
as a central element of how we view others and others view us.
Political Fairness
Political decision and action in a mass society are complex and so most of us don’t expect to
benefit from every political decision. Win some, lose some. We’re generally even willing to
accept an occasional unfair decision. But we will keep score about political unfairness —
regardless of who is being unfairly treated. We’re not necessarily altruistic in our concern about
the unfair treatment of others, but rather we realize that such unfair behavior may be directed at
us the next time.
Secrecy and lying are thus as counterproductive in politics as they are in marriage and family.
Our Constitution and legal system are explicit in requiring that governmental decision making be
open, in order to enhance fairness. The press and Courts exist to report and adjudicate
instances of deceptive unfairness.
A free press (whether paper or electronic) should thus contain investigative reporters,
columnists, and commentators from across the political spectrum to insure that the public is
informed of fair/unfair behavior across the political spectrum. Few voters expect balanced
information from political ads, but rather expect that unfair candidates will become unfair officials
if elected — and so they vote accordingly.
Assuming a free press, the track record of the incumbent is fairly clear (unless it’s a position
such as State Insurance Commissioner that many voters don’t really understand). Voter
knowledge of a challenger is often less clear. So how does our voting brain assess competence
and fairness in candidates when we don’t personally know enough about them to make an
informed decision?
We depend on the advice of credible others in the same way that we depend on book reviewers
and film critics who have provided good advice in the past. Many candidates thus seek
endorsements from widely respected individuals, or a newspaper campaign ad may list dozens
of local citizens who support a candidate. Political party affiliation similarly helps voters to
identify candidates who represent their political values.