architectural
precedents?
107
AMSTERDAM ORPHANAGE The Amersterdam Orphanage is home to 120 children. The hous ng type is made up of little
pavil on like residential un ts that are clustered together to create both communal and private
AMSTERDAM, THE NETHERLANDS liv ng spaces. The hous ng is organized by age and gender of the children, as to prov ded the
ALDO VAN EYCK 1960 spaces required for the specific age groups. Each residential unit opens to a courtyard. The
walls act as a shell that wraps and protects the children while d ssolving nto the outdoor
spaces. The organizat on of the program parts are interlocking and consider public/private,
-houses 120 children age/gender, and the idea of the collective and individual space. The dea s to create a com-
munity w th in this large populat on of children. Van Eyck created an architecture that allow
-orphanage as both house and a little city
spatial relationships between each space as to no create solation or str ct boundaries with n
-shell the orphanage.
-courtyard
Th s is a key precedent in the study of housing typology for children. The organization of
-open/closed space s very successful through the integrat on of children and the home environment while
-interlocking not creating an nst tutional like home. The way in which Van Eyck uses the architecture to
create spaces that protect, integrate, nterlock, will be explored further within th s thes s proj-
-community
ect. Creat ng a commun ty like home and a little city for the orphan children will be examined
-integration through similar techiques Van Eyck used to execute the Amsterdam Orphanage.
108
figure 26
figure 27 & 28: v ew of the loggia in the pat o of one of the ground units.
109
11 13
12
1 20 1
14
3 16 5 6
g
2
boy
15 17 2
19
18 3
3
1 b oys
ys 14 18 -1 upper storey
2 gir
g 14 18 -1 1 b ys 1
dormitories
3
4
boy
ch re 10
chi d1 n14
girls
1
4 5 1 boys
b y 1 18 -1 4
5 chc l dren
ren 6-102 41 24 girls
gir 1 18 -1
6 c babi
il r n s 4-6 3 boys
me 10-1
tn
7 c nfil rma
ren 2-4
y 4 roo 10-14
girls f
8 babies
fes iv 5 meeting room
6 rooms for living-in staff
6
9 in heatre
irmary
10
1
11
festive
tr eehallp
theatre
eam leade and gymnaisum
a d ta f
g
10
1
12 a m
tru e s, is ps
ra hol
n a gist,r
team
st roomleader nd and brary
staff
13
1 administration
m inten nc and ser iarchive
e oom
7
1
14 garage
staf room and library
1
15 ma enan
main tena e ceservice
serviceror om
m
16
1 garage
mai k
17
1 maintenance/service
team le der’s residence room
18
2
19
main kitchen,
ent ance to director’s
team leader’s residence
cle she residence
8 9
20 entrance gr und o shed
to cycle r
2
ground floor
5 2 0 2 6 10 20
110
11 11
13 13
12 12
20 20
1 1
14 16 14 16
2 15 17 2 15 17
19
18 18
3 3
4 5 4 5
6 6
10 10
ground floor
5 2 0 2 6 10 20
111
girls 10-18
communal spaces
public service area
service area boys 10-18
ground floor
private children under 10
5 2 0 2 6 10 20
112
plan of units for children
ages 2-4 and 4-6
1 cloakroom
2 brick play-house
3 lower section with
surrounding bench
4 modelling tray at low
window
5 unit containing cupboards
plan of ground floor units for chilren aged 2-4 and 4-6 1
and heating 3 4
6 open kitchen 2
7 sitting area
8 washplace 10
9 showers 9 13 13 13
10 toilets 6
11 sand pit with rainwater traps 8
5
12 roofed playroom
13 dormitory ‘boxes’
7
12
11
elevation/section
(left) unit for older children
(right) unit for younger children
113
NEXUS WORLD HOUSING The Nexus World Hous ng is made up of twenty-four courtyard houses all three
FUKUOKA, JAPAN stories h gh. The design uses three unit modules that fit together compactly.
REM KOOLHAAS/OMA 1991 Each unit has its own private courtyard to allow natural light and air through the
three storey un t. The hous ng type is an nward and vertical courtyard scheme.
The organization of the each unit s layered horizontally from the street level
-24 apartments (3 stories)
accommodat ng the service area and commerical program, the second level is
-each unit is free standing blocks
for sleeping, and the third level being the liv ng area.
-vertical arranagement of the core
-dense
This precedent is a great example n the organization of compact living spaces
-solid and void
and how modules can be used. The vertical courtyard scheme in this design
is very successful in how it incorporates natural l ght to penetrate through all
three levels of the units. This a desirable scheme to explore for the housing
componenet for th s thes s project.
figure 29: model of the design scheme. figure 30 & 31: daytime and nightt me render ngs of the courtyard houses. figure 32: aerial view of the build ng with n its urba
114
figure 33: panoram c view from the front of nexus world housing.
iving room
2 terrace
3 dining room
4 kitchen
5 extra room
an context. 6 void
7 service balcony
115
B
B1
concre e ‘cyclo
3 living area
2 sleeping area
col
1 city
walls
bedroom
living founda ion
terrace
patio
bauni
typical h
3 living area 2 sleeping area 1 city bathroom
116
sun
sun
sun
living area 3
sleeping area 2
city 1
living area 3
sleeping area 2
city
g are 12
living area 3
sleeping area 2
city 1
vertical space
117
UDC SCATTERED SITE HOUSE PROJECT The scattered house project is used a precedent as a house type. The
rty
ITHACA, NY low-rise stepped courtyard scheme s a great organizational strategy for
WERNER SELIGMANN & ASSOCIATES 1992 housing. There are two units connected that each open upon a private
courtyard. Th s scheme could be an interest ng way n th s thesis project
house house and how to occupy the ‘plinth’ of sakura park.
courtyard
house house
courtyard
figure 34: aerial view of the courtyard housing. figure 35: view of the stepped courtyard houses from the bottom of the s te.
house
cour yard
118
urban orphanage | from isolation to integration
valerie rachel herrera | Thesis advisors randall korman, francisco sanin
This thesis contends that by reconceptualizing the spatial, programmatic, and sociopolitical forces that form the
41 102
basis of the orphanage typology, an architectural framework can be constructed that can instigate and facilitate 104
new conditions of programmatic overlap between the 'urban cultural' and the 'private/secure residential';
fundamentally altering the outdated assumptions of the orphanage type in favor of a contemporary response,
41 102
which embeds the orphanage in the city and the city in the orphanage. By integrating the orphan community with the
broader context the orphan evolves understanding him/herself as a fully participant 'member' of society and not outside of it.
what does a traditional what does the foster what does a traditional what does the proposal for the
home provide? care system provide? orphanage provide? new orphanage provide?
temporary
unwanted
neglected unadoptable
abused
unadoptable
neglected abused
one temporary
9
night stay
8
7
1
10 11 12 13 14
temporary
over
15
16
17
18
19
20
crowded
shelter many broken homes residential institution for orphan youth residential educational center - orphan youth
microcosm of the city
+11’
ground level / claremont ave / art gallery / student commons / theater / gymnasium / administration / cafeteria
N
family no consistant family large groups of children integrate orphan youth + community
basic necessities
food basic necessities
?
play childhood
childhood
architecture:
architecture: integrated + inclusive
isolated from society
X reclusive
education lack of
education
A
education
identity identity
8
7
1
10 11 12 13 14
LOWEST
15
16
17
18
19
20
20
19
18
17
16
HIGHEST
15
12 14
13
3 12
4 11
5 10
6 9
7 8
CIRCULATION DIAGRAMS
N
ORPHANAGE CITY TO THE SITE
CIRCULATION FILTER | SECURITY
1
GYM
CAFE
COURTYARD
THEATER
Harlem
Riverside
Park
119
resources / bibliography
BIBLIOGRAPHY: ENDNOTES:
Bethesda Home for Boys Web site. Online: http://www.bethes- Gutman, Marta. “Under Siege: Construction and Care at the Fan- 1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services - Administra-
dahomeforboys.org, accessed 10/2011. nie Wall Children’s Home and Day Nursery.” Center for Working tion for Children & Families, 2011.
Families (2002): 1-47. University of California, Berkeley. Web. 23
Ceppi, Giulio. Children, Spaces, Relations: Metaproject for an May 2011. 2. We need to rethink orphanages for a simple reason: The lives
Environment for Young Children. [S.l.]: Grafiche Rebecchi, of children are at stake. Again, orphanages might never be a
1998. Print. Hertzberger, Herman. Space and Learning: Lessons in Architec- major part of the solution for problems that so many children
ture 3. Rotterdam: 010, 2008. Print. face, but they might be a minor yet important part—as they were
“Child Care.” Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Wikipe- in the past. Orphanages, however, must first be viewed as they
dia, The Free Encyclopedia. Web. 25 May 2011. <http:// Ligtelijn, Vincent. Aldo van Eyck: Works. Basel: Birkhäuser actually were and not as the novels and movies have portrayed
en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Child care>. Publishers, 1999. p. 48. them. They need to be seen for the considerable good that they
Malaguzzi, Loris, Giulio Ceppi, and Michele Zini. Children, did for many children and not just for their failings, which they
Clinton, Hillary Rodham. It Takes a Village: and Other Lessons Spaces, Relations: Metaproject for an Environment for Young no doubt did.
Children Teach Us. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996. Print. Children. Reggio Emilia, Italy: Reggio Children, 1998. Print. Richard McKenzie, Rethinking Orphanages of the 21st Century,
p. 13.
Dewey, John. Experience and Education. New York: Collier, McKenzie, Richard B. Rethinking Orphanages for the 21st Cen-
1963. Print. tury. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1999. Print. 3. The designers of the contemporary child welfare system
proposed that the permanent care of children in institutions
Dudek, Mark. Architecture of Schools: the New Learning Envi- “Orphan.” Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia, The be replace with temporary care in foster homes. That was an
ronments. Oxford: Architectural, 2000. Print. Free Encyclopedia. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://en.wikipedia. untested dream decades ago. Regrettably, for far too many
org/w/index.php?title=Orphan>. children, the dream has become the worst of all forms of care—
Dudek, Mark. Kindergarten Architecture: Space for the Imagi- permanent temporary care.
nation. London: E & FN Spon, 1996. Print. “Orphanage.” Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia, Richard McKenzie, Rethinking Orphanages of the 21st Century,
The Free Encyclopedia. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://en.wikipedia. p. 1.
“Foster Care.” Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Wiki- org/w/index.php?title=Orphanage>.
pedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Web. 20 May 2011. <http:// 4. Lawrence J. McQuillan, A Brighter Future: Solutions to Policy
en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foster care>. SOS Children’s Villages Illinois Web site. Online: http://www. Issues Affecting America’s Children, p. 6.
sosillinois.org, accessed 10/2011.
Goṭesman, Meir. Residential Child Care: an International 5. Lawrence J. McQuillan, A Brighter Future: Solutions to Policy
Reader. London: Whiting & Birch in Association with FICE, Strauven, Francis, Aldo Van Eyck, and Herman Hertzberger. Aldo Issues Affecting America’s Children, p. 6-7.
1991. Print. Van Eyck’s Orphanage: a Modern Monument. [Rotterdam]: NAi,
1996. Print. 6. Wikipedia - the free encyclopedia, Melting Pot, Online: http://
Gottlieb, Beatrice. The Historical Background of Morningside en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melting pot,accessed 9/2011
Gardens. 2008. UNICEF - UNICEF Home. Web. 16 July 2011. <http://www.unicef.
Org/>. 7. Herman Hertzberger, Space and Learning, p. 35.
Gutman, Marta. “Adopted Homes for Yesterday’s Children: World Orphans. Web. 16 July 2011. <http://www.worldorphans.
Constructing Care in Oakland, California.” Center for Working org/index.php?>. 8. Giulio Ceppi and Michele Zini, Children, spaces, relations, p.
Families (2002): 1-67. University of California, Berkeley. Web. 116.
25 May 2011. Zmora, Nurith. Orphanages Reconsidered: Child Care Institu-
tions in Progressive Era Baltimore. Philadelphia: Temple UP, 9. Herman Hertzberger, Space and Learning, p. 118.
Gutman, Marta. “Adopted Homes for Yesterday’s Children.” 1994. Print.
Pacific Historical Review 73.4 (2004): 581-618. University of 10. Herman Hertzberger, Space and Learning, p. 46.
California Press. Web. 23 May 2011. <http://www.jstor.org/
stable/10.1525/phr.2004.73.4.581>. 11. Wikipedia - the free encyclopedia, Residential Education,
Online: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Residential education, ac-
cessed 10/2011.
120
IMAGE CITATION:
figure 15: v ew of grant’s tomb from west s de. Historic American Buildings Survey. Ac-
12. Herman Hertzberger, Space and Learning, p. 35. figure 1: The Children’s Aid Society: The Orphan Trains, onl ne archive. Accessed 09/2011
cessed 09/2011
<http://www.childrensaidsociety.org/orphan-trains/photo-galler es/archive-photos-
<http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/collections/habs_haer/>
13. Wikipedia - the free encyclopedia, Orphan, Online: http:// education>
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orphan, accessed 10/2011. figure 16: nside v ew of grant’s crypt. Historic American Buildings Survey. Accessed
figure 2: Advertisment: Troy Free Press, February 25, 1910. Accessed 09/2011
09/2011
<http://www.rootsweb.com/~mogrundy/orphans.html>
14. Bethesda Home for Boys Website, Online: http://www. <http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/collections/habs_haer/>
bethesdaforboys.org, accessed 10/2011. figure 3: Child migrants from Fairbridge, setting out for Australia, 1938. Photo from figure 17: v ew from the east, and southwest side of nst tute of music art (or ginal juilliard),
Merseys de Mar time Museum, Liverpool. Accessed 09/2011 1910. new york public library, online archive. Accessed 09/2011
15. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Adminis- <http://melbourneblogger.blogspot.com/2011/05/child-migrantsdeportees-from-brita n-to. <http://digitalgallery.nypl.org/nypldig tal/index.cfm>
tration for Children and Facilities, Foster Care Statistics 2009, html>
September 2011. figure 18: edge of sakura park and manhattan school of mus c (Juilliard).
figure 4: ‘Typeline’: Historic American Buildings Survey. Accessed 09/2011 claremont ave - 122nd st. w., 1928-36. new york public library, online archive. Accessed
16. Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System, <http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/collections/habs_haer/> 09/2011
<http://digitalgallery.nypl.org/nypldig tal/index.cfm>
Interim FY 2000 data.
figure 5: aerial view of morn ngside heights neighborhoold. new york public library,
figure 19: riverside church, 1930. v ew from the south - riverside drive and claremont
online archive. Accessed 09/2011
17. Lawrence J. McQuillan, A Brighter Future: Solutions to avenue.Architecture and Urbanism Between two Worlds Wars, 1930. Rober A.M. Stern
<http://d gitalgallery.nypl.org/nypldigital/ ndex.cfm>
Policy Issues Affecting America’s Children, p. 8-9.
figure 20: riverside church. riverside drive - 122nd st. w., 1936. new york public library,
figure 6: aerial view of morn ngside heights neighborhoold. new york public library,
online archive. Accessed 09/2011
18. Lawrence J. McQuillan, A Brighter Future: Solutions to online archive. Accessed 09/2011
<http://digitalgallery.nypl.org/nypldig tal/index.cfm>
Policy Issues Affecting America’s Children, p. 9. <http://d gitalgallery.nypl.org/nypldigital/ ndex.cfm>
figure 21: nternational house under construction, 1910. new york public library, onl ne
19. Richard McKenzie, Rethinking Orphanages of the 21st figure 7: aerial view of morn ngside heights - sakura park.
archive. Accessed 09/2011
Century, p. forward. Gottl eb, Beatrice. The Historical Background of Morningside Gardens. 2008.
<http://digitalgallery.nypl.org/nypldig tal/index.cfm>
figure 14: Panoramic view of the Hudson River and Grant’s Tomb. Historic American
Buildings Survey. Accessed 09/2011
<http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/collections/habs_haer/>
121