RS AND GIS
A.S. Chandra Bose1, M.V.S.S.Giridhar2 and G.K.Viswanadh3
1
Lecturer, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Govt. Polytechnic, Warangal – 506 001, India,
Tel: + 91-9849318002; Fax: +91-040-23158668
E.mail:smilesubhashbose@yahoo.com
2
Asst Prof in Center for Water Resources and Addl. Controller of Exams, J N T U Hyderabad, India,
Tel: + 91-9440590695; Fax: +91-040-23158668
E.mail: mvssgiri@yahoo.com
3
Professor of Civil Engg and Director of Evaluation, J.N.T.U.H, Hyderabad - 500 085, India,
Tel: + 91-9849163875; Fax: +91-040-23158668
E.mail:gorti_gkv@yahoo.co.in
KEYWORDS: 3D analyst, weighted overlay analysis, TIN, DEM, Slope map, spatial analyst.
ABSTRACT: A case study of Kadam reservoir catchment, Andhra Pradesh, India has been
taken up to identify the ground water potential zones. The thematic maps of soil,
Hydrogeomorphology and Land use/Land cover prepared for the study area. The Digital
Elevation Model (DEM) has been generated from the 20 m contour interval contour lines
derived from SOI toposheets. Slope map has been prepared from DEM. These maps have been
overlaid in terms of weighed overlay method using Spatial Analysis tool in Arc GIS 9.3 version.
During weighed overlay analysis, the ranking has been given for each individual parameter of
each thematic map and weights of 25%, 35%, 30% and 10% were assigned according to their
influence for Soil, Hydrogeomorphology, Land use/Land cover, and Slope themes respectively
and obtained the ground water potential zones in terms of Good, Moderate and Poor zones in
the form of a GIS map. Finally, the respective areal extents of Good, Moderate and Poor zones
were calculated and found to be 27.19, 2170.53 and 397.26 square kms respectively apart from
water bodies and settlements. The GIS based output was validated by conducting field survey
by selecting wells randomly in different locations of the catchment.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Groundwater is a dynamic and replenishing natural resource. But in hard rock terrains,
availability of groundwater is of limited extent. Occurrence of groundwater in such rocks is
essentially confined to fractured and weathered horizons. Poor knowledge about this resource,
because of its hidden nature and its occurrence in complex subsurface formations has been and
is still a big obstacle to the efficient management of this important resource. In India, 65 percent
of the total geographical area is covered by hard rock formations with low porosity (<5%) and
very low permeability (10-1 to 10-5 m/day) (Saraf and Chodhury,1998). Therefore, efficient
management of and planning of groundwater in these areas is of utmost importance. The
Remote sensing and GIS tools have opened new paths in water resources studies. Remote
sensing provides multi-spectral, multi-temporal and multi- sensor data of the earth’s surface
(Choudhury et al., 2003). One of the greatest advantages of using RS and GIS for hydrological
investigations and monitoring is its ability to generate information in spatial and temporal
domain, which is crucial for successful analysis, prediction and validation (Sarma and Saraf,
2002).
In recent years, intensive use of satellite remote sensing has made it easier to define the spatial
distribution of different ground water prospect water zones on the basis of geomorphology,
hydrogeology and other associated features (Babar, 2001). In ground water exploration, remote
sensing plays a vital role both at regional level and local levels. When used in preliminary
stages of the survey, the technique helps in delineating potential area of water bearing capacity
where further exploration work could be taken up, thus drastically reducing the cost and time
involved in water exploration. Using image interpretation keys such as tone, texture, pattern,
drainage, topography etc., satellite imageries can be used to delineate geomorphic features like
paleo channels, older flood plains, valley fills, alluvial plains, pediments, abandoned channels,
Pedi plains, lineaments, weathered zones etc. Satellite imageries have been found to be useful
in identifying linear features such as fractures, faults, etc which are local idealizers of ground
water sinks especially in hard rock terrains. Lithologic contacts are also brought out fairly well
on the images. Remotely sensed data provides valuable information on the drainage pattern and
drainage density, which have a bearing on the recharge conditions and permeability of the
rocks. Dykes which act as ground water barrier can be easily identified on the imagery. Satellite
data thus offers unique tool in for extracting information on geology, drainage, Land use and
soils which are essential in identifying the possible occurrence of ground water.
Contour and DEM maps have been developed in GIS environment. The highest and lowest
elevations were found to be 350 and 160mts respectively. Slope map was prepared from the
DEM map. Slopes of the study area were found to vary between 0 to 28%. The various soil
units obtained from soil map are 19, 59, 60, 61,62,63,66 and 68 with coverage percentages of
0.58, 10.59, 0.67, 18.91, 14.85, 48.83 and 0.97 respectively. The soil unit 63 is found to be
predominant, covering 48.83 % in the study area. Study area has been classified for Land Use /
Land Cover into five classes’ viz., Water bodies, Crop land, Bare soil, Fallow land and Forest
based on Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) values with areal extents of 20.244,
457.625, 49.931, 143.337 and 1946.43 sq km respectively. Forest class in the study has been
found to be predominant with 73% of the total area. Various Hydrogeomorphic units such as
highly dissected plateau, Mesa/butte, Shallow weathered Pedi plain, Pediment Isenberg
complex, shallow dissected plateau, Residual hills and Structural hills have been found to be
associated with the study area covering 554.46, 17.05, 146.69, 831.54, 983.21, 45.15 and 16.82
square kms respectively. These maps have been overlaid in terms of weighed overlay method
using Spatial Analysis tool in Arc GIS 9.3 version. During weighed overlay analysis, the
ranking has been given for each individual parameter of each thematic map and weights of
25%, 35%, 30% and 10% were assigned according to their influence for Soil,
Hydrogeomorphology, Land use/Land cover, and Slope themes respectively and obtained the
ground water potential zones in terms of Good, Moderate and Poor zones in the form of a GIS
map. Finally, the respective areal extents of Good, Moderate and Poor zones were calculated
and found to be 27.19, 2170.53 and 397.26 square kms respectively apart from water bodies
and settlements. The GIS based output was validated by conducting field survey by selecting
wells randomly in different locations of the catchment.
Fig 4.1 DEM map Fig 4.2 Slope Map
6. 0References
1. Arnoff S (1989) ‘Geographical Information System’, WELP Publication, Ottawa,
Canada.
2. Baber, Md.(2001) Hydrogeomorphological studies by Remote sensing application in
AkoliWatershed(Jintur) Parbhani dist., Maharashtra, India. Spatial information
Technology, Remote sensing and GIS-ICORG, Vol-II pp 137-143
3. Chowdhary, VM, Rao NH and Sarma PBS (2003) GIS- based decision support system
for ground water assessment in large irrigation project areas, Agricultural water
management 62:229-252.
4. Krishna Murhy J, Kumar NV, jayaraman V and Manivel M(1996) An approach to
demarcate ground water potential zones through remote sensing and GIS .International
Journal of Remote Sensing 17(10): 1867-1884
5. Saraf AK and Chowdary PR (1998) integrated remote sensing and GIS for ground water
exploration and identification of artificial recharge sites. International Journal of Remote
sensing 19(10): 1825-1841
6. Sarma B and Saraf AK (2002) Study of land use – ground water relationship using an
integrated remote sensing and GIS approach, http://www.gisdevelopmentnet
Form for Full Paper
To,
31st ACRS Secretariat,
Department of Environmental Information Study and Analysis EISA
Institute of Geography
18 Hoang Quoc Viet Rd., Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam
Phone : 84-04-37562417
Fax : 84-04-8361192
E-mail for general correspondence: acrs2010.secretariat@gmail.com