2019 Autumn 49069 v3 Standard City 28-2-19

SUBJECT OUTLINE
49069 Leadership and Responsibility

Course area UTS: Engineering
Delivery Autumn 2019; standard mode; City
Credit points 6cp
Result type Grade and marks
Subject coordinator
Tom Anderson
Building 11 Level 6
Email: tom.anderson@uts.edu.au
Telephone: 9514 2639
Teaching staff
Tom Anderson
Email: tom.anderson@uts.edu.au
Please do not hesitate to contact Tom should you have any academic questions relating to this subject. Email
enquires will be accepted at any time and generally will be responded to within 24 hours unless the issue is complex. It
makes some sense to have a subject line that does not suggest that the email is spam. Please provide adequate
subject identification and if your enquiry warrants it personal identification. If your issue is a significant one possibly
requiring some administrative assistance you should also provide your student number. Your student's UTS email
address is the formal address that UTS uses to contact and communicate with you. University rules require email sent
from a student to the University must be sent from the student's UTS email address.
Subject description
This subject develops an understanding of the role of engineering and technical managers as responsible leaders in
organisations. It focuses on the need to work through other people, not only subordinates and supervisors, but other
managers and leaders. The subject provides a comprehensive review of leadership theory by following the timeline of
historical development. It teaches that there exists many complex facets of leadership and emphasises the belief that
one should not accept a position of trust without accepting the responsibility that goes with it. However, the art of
leadership cannot be learned solely from books, virtual cafes or YouTube videos, it needs to be experienced and
practised by doing and by interacting with real humans. A central teaching element of this subject is a set of activities
that require engagement, motivation, critical thinking, verbal communication, group participation, perseverance and
performance under time pressure.
Subject learning objectives (SLOs)

Upon successful completion of this subject students should be able to:
1. Demonstrate a developed capacity to be a life long student of leadership.
2. Identify and demonstrate a capacity to consider both positive and negative aspects associated with a set of ideas
or a problem or opportunity and reach a personal position that places due weight on different perspectives.
Students should be able apply critical analysis/thinking effectively.
3. Execute and proactively pursue self-reflection as a means of guiding their personal, managerial and leadership
development.
4. Communicate a well developed awareness of the historical development and the thrust of the dominant
leadership theories and be able to discuss their strengths and weaknesses.
28/02/2019 (Autumn 2019) © University of Technology Sydney Page 1 of 21

Course intended learning outcomes (CILOs)
This subject also contributes specifically to the development of the following faculty Course Intended Learning
Outcomes (CILOs) and Engineers Australia (EA) Stage 1 competencies:
Apply systems thinking to understand complex system behaviour including interactions between components and
with other systems (social, cultural, legislative, environmental, business etc.) (A.5)
Demonstrate research skills (B.6)
Apply abstraction, mathematics and/or discipline fundamentals to analysis, design and operation (C.1)
Manage own time and processes effectively by prioritising competing demands to achieve personal goals (Manage
self) (D.1)
Reflect on personal and professional experiences to engage in independent development beyond formal education
for lifelong learning (D.2)
Communicate effectively in ways appropriate to the discipline, audience and purpose (E.1)
Work as an effective member or leader of diverse teams within a multilevel, multidisciplinary and multicultural
setting (E.2)
Be able to conduct critical self-review and performance evaluation against appropriate criteria as a primary means
of tracking personal development needs and achievements (F.1)
Appreciate ethical implications of professional practice (F.2)
Understand cross-cultural issues (regions or workplaces) (F.3)
Contribution to the development of graduate attributes

Engineers Australia Stage 1 competencies
Students enrolled in the Master of Professional Engineering should note that this subject contributes to the assurance
of Engineers Australia Stage 1 competencies: 1.5, 3.1, 3.2, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6.
Teaching and learning strategies

Students are expected to access the UTSOnline site for the subject and engage with the extensive set of digital
self-learning resources provided. The subject’s Lecture Support Notes (LSN) book, Reading Material (RM) book and
Workbook (refer to Other resourcse) are resources used for both in-class and out of class learning activities. Virtual
lectures are provided in video or audio files supported by power point presentation format.
Student learning in the subject is facilitated by a combination of:
1. Active learning tasks to reinforce and consolidate learning. Tasks are scheduled for each session week (see
"Program" below). The Workbook contains a collection of specifically focused exercises and activities and is the source
of many in-class activities and self-assessment/evaluation instruments.
2. Contact meetings that incorporate:

Blended lectures that aim at providing supplementary explanation and broader real-life context to the information
and theoretical concepts contained in the LSN. Some synthesis is attempted to demonstrate connections between
various ideas and aspects of knowledge. A feature of subject delivery is the modelling of critical thinking and
encouragement of student thoughtful analysis.
Small group collaborative discussion exercises and problems aimed at clarifying the level of understanding of
important concepts. Several subject exercises encourage self-monitoring and self-awareness.
Two or three classes will focus on collaborative student guided completion of open ended leadership/management
problems.
Student presentations and peer review and feedback.
Question and answer sessions offer an opportunity to progressively raise queries and to discuss and clarify
concepts regarding subject content and assignment tasks.
3. A set of seven Debates that occur within a complex operational structure. Each student will be allocated to a
seven-member debate group and over the last six to eight weeks of the session seven debates will be held using
UTSOnline forums under the main Discussion Board and the Private Group discussion forums and communication
facilities. Each group will have at least one Distance student embedded in the group.

facilities. Each group will have at least one Distance student embedded in the group.
4. Encouraged consultation directly after contact meetings and by out of meeting email correspondence. Questions
raised as part of this consultation will form the basis of every other day announcements that provide advice, guidance
and feedback via UTSOnline. The announcements aim at assisting student learning and motivating continuous
engagement.
5. Assignments that reinforce aspects of leadership theory but are also designed and structured to allow students to
reflect on real-life application and to develop practical skills. The second assignment attempts to reinforce the value of
studying the leadership of others.
6. Subject announcements will be made using UTSOnline. Students are expected to regularly check the
announcements page for information. A specific design feature of the subject delivery is that from Week 6 subject
participation activities are generally not pre-scheduled. This approach is used because it best models (within the
significant constraints of an academic environment) the reality of leadership. Leaders have a set of objectives which
generate a base work load and in addition they must cope with a range of unexpected task that are often required to be
resolved or completed urgently. You need to be aware of the assignment due dates and be vigilant in identifying the
announcement of subject participation activities and their deadlines.
7. Use of similarity detection software. Each assignment offers at least one opportunity to submit a draft and obtain
similarity feedback. This allows the student to reflect on their success in putting information in their own words and
where necessary to appropriately reference the words of others.
8. Leadership and Responsibility does not have a final examination. This aspect of the subject’s educational design
results from the coordinator’s belief that whilst leadership theory is important and beneficial in providing insights,
leadership development requires practice and direct experience. The subject offers opportunities to practice and
observe others practicing (or in a few cases not practicing) leadership skills.
Note: Feedback is available prior to the session census date for Week 1 tasks; the early diagnostic test titled
“Management Understanding Diagnostic Test”; Subject Activity #1 Individual Home Page Blog and Subject Activity #2
“Manager from Technocrat” Parts 1 and 2.
Study approach
The subject is offered in a few different modes. Each learning mode has a separate subject outline. The learning
objectives and content are the same for all modes. There are however some differences in emphasis and in
assignment work because of specific constraints presented by the various modes. The Subject Outline for the specific
session of study being undertaken must be read in conjunction with the Supplementary Instructions. Both documents
will be posted on UTSOnline and provide information and advice on many facets of the subject content, its
administration and the student’s obligations. It is mandatory that students obtain, read and comply with the
requirements of both the subject outline and supplementary instructions.
Whilst your study approach is a personal choice, do keep in mind that this subject is not one that can be mastered by
some cursory reading and frantic activity just prior to the due dates for assignments. The participation requirements
demand a schedule of continuous engagement with the subject. Of course, assignment due dates set time limits for
achieving necessary competence in some aspects of material comprehension and subject objectives.
A willingness to take personal responsibility is a key element of successful learning. It is estimated that you should set
aside a minimum total of approximately 9 hours of study time per week (inclusive of any face to face contact)
throughout the session. This is a rough guide only as people learn at different rates and will approach the subject from
different backgrounds and levels of experience and have different ambitions and expectations regarding outcomes. It is
also reasonable to expect assignment deadlines will add a potential load peak.
Leaving study/activity and assessment items to the last minute is a common problem for most students. Such
behaviour is the antithesis of leadership. To maximise your learning from this subject you should work consistently and
progressively throughout the study session. The best way to achieve this is to allocate a study time at the beginning of
the session, given the participative nature of the subject this should be planned as a few blocks of time each week
rather than a single large weekly block. Make sure you adhere to the planned schedule making adjustment as your
experience dictates. You should also have a contingency allowance for the requirements that you hadn't been able to
foresee.
The assessment regime of the subject requires every student to have some involvement with the learning opportunities

associated with the three resource books. However, the books also provide extension subject matter and are
particularly valuable for those students who wish to do more than just study the basics. They offer an opportunity to
gain a far more rounded and deeper understanding of organisational leadership theory and practices than will be
achieved by simply focusing on assignments and mandatory subject activities.
Content (topics)
Leadership involves a complex range of activities and one possible framework for studying the topic is outlined below.
This subject will focus on the elements of “the Research”, “the Popular Literature and Practitioner’s Views” and
“Critical Thinking”. However, it is important to remember that the scope of any leadership position is likely to be very
broad.
________________________________________________________________________________
SELF
Leadership - the Research, the Popular Literature and Practitioner’s Views
Self Management
Ethics
Critical Thinking
Strategic Thinking
OTHERS AS INDIVIDUALS
Motivation
Coaching / Mentoring
Conflict Management
OTHERS COLLECTIVELY
Teams / Groups
Communication / Meetings
ORGANISATION ISSUES
Recruitment / Placement
Appraising
Training / Development
Occupational Health and Safety
______________________________________________________________________________
Program
Week/Session Dates Description
Note: The program below sets out the thrust of each of the semester's contact
meetings. Distance student may find the program schedule and the
subject audio files a useful resource.
The subject announcement page on UTSOnline will provide a

continuous stream of subject information, subject administrative and
assignment advice, content explanation and learning tips as well as
proclaiming the commencement and deadlines for various subject
activities and each of the web debates. This resource aims to ensure a
continuous and semester long engagement with Leadership and
Responsibility and its various potential learning experiences.
#####
Note: "Starts" date is the Monday of the relevant session week not the
date of your timetabled class.

Week 1 Starts 11 Mar 2019 Meeting: Session Week 1
Essential Preparation:
Read the welcome message and all current announcements posted on

UTSOnline under the announcement navigation button.
Students should attempt the short disgnostic test "Management

Understanding Diagnostic Test' on UTSOnline.
Download the 49069 Leadership and Responsibility “Subject Outline”

booklet and the “Supplementary Instructions” document from UTSOnline.
Students must read both the subject outline and the supplementary
instructions diligently before Session Week 2.
Obtain or be aware of the Covey "text-book" it can be purchased from

the co-op bookshop, the web or from most large bookstores or possibly
borrowed from a friend or colleague. Reading the book forms the
preparatory requirement of one assessment task.
You should be browsing through the various resources on the 49069

UTSOnline subject site to become familiar with both the resources and
the structure of the site. The use of the UTSOnline portal for
communication and learning activity will be substantial.
Continue to check regularly for new announcement posted on

UTSOnline.
Advisable:
The subject is supported by a “Reading Materials” book and a “Lecture

Support Notes” book, both books can be down loaded from UTSOnline.
Students should be generally aware of these two resources and be
confident they can readily access them.
Students should ensure they have a sound understanding of the

assessment requirements.
Topic: Introduction to subject. In class Haiku activity completed and

submitted if time available.
Post meeting activity and reading: Students must complete Subject

Activity # 1 (their "home-page" blog on UTSOnline) and start Subject
Activity # 2 Manager from Technocrat by reading the paper/book extract
“Pirsig” contained in the Instruction booklet Appendix 3 - “Manager from
Technocrat” papers.
Pre reading: Read and consider the validity of the views expressed in
the article “The Family”
Topic: Topic: Critical Analysis. Session topic to be completed however

limited time will be available to discuss all aspects of "The family" article
in class, therefore students should review this exercise at home after
class in the light of the thrust of the ideas engaged with in the class
session. Resources provided: 1. Workbook (to be returned at the end of
each class). 2. DVD "Manager from Technocrat" made available through
UTSOnline.
Post meeting activity and reading: Continue Subject Activity #2 by

reading the remaining two papers (2. Posner and 3. South) contained in

the Instruction booklet Appendix 3 - “Manager from Technocrat” papers.
Students are advised to prepare a concise reflective report on the three
papers. This report is not to be submitted but will be beneficial for the
second part of Subject Activity #2
Study the self-learning material titled "Manager from Technocrat".

Resources: Lecture Support Notes, Audio file and DVD.
Topic: Start Leadership Theory, complete Part 1 “Introductory

Comments The focus of the remaining lecture time is the "Trait"
approach up to the concept of self-monitoring. The exercise in the
workbook "Traits: What Makes a Good Leader " probably undertaken in
a more limited format (2 traits only). Begin to explore the concepts of
self-monitoring and self-awareness. Probably up to the connection
between the two. Undertaken in class “Self -monitoring” test.
Week 4 Starts 1 Apr 2019 Meeting: Session Week 4
Topic: Preliminary “Debate Groups” established. A class activity on

brainstorming undertaken. The content associated with the activity will
be recorded in a mp3 file.
Post meeting work: Subject Activity # 3 must now be undertaken. Each

debate group must prepare a single statement setting out their
understanding of what is required of the group and its members for the
Web Debate activity (maximum length 300 words). This statement is to
be placed on the Groups private chat board with a heading “Final
Statement Web Debate Responsibilities” Each individual student in the
group must make at least one chat board entry contributing some
comment to the final statement’s development or agreeing to its content.
Week 5 Start 8 Apr 2019 Meeting: Semester Week 5
Pre meeting work: Read and consider the validity of the short written
item “Obsolescence”
Topic: A mini debate based on the topic of "Obsolescence" undertaken

in class. After the debate individuals (selected at random) will be asked
to present their assigned position.
Debate Groups finalised.
Post meeting work: Web Debate 1 to start towards the end of the week.
Note: Pre reading and Post meeting work for Session Weeks 6 through to
12 and the details of various further participation activities and the
commencement of each of the web debates will be progressively
announced via UTSOnline.
This is part of the subject's learning design, refer "Teaching and learning
strategies".

Topic: Complete self-monitoring and self-awareness. " Empathy

Quotient (EQ)" test including the self-prediction of results and scoring.
Gender is identified as a trait largely overlooked by the research."
Systematizing Quotient (SQ)" test including the self-prediction of results
and scoring. Class scores will be identified for both EQ and SQ.
Look at some of the complexities that are appearing with the attempt to
develop a theory. Intelligence - professional capability, IQ and Theory of
multiple intelligences considered. Undertake the workbook quiz on
multiple intelligences.
Stuvac Starts 22 Apr 2019 Mid Session Stuvac (SVM)
Topic: Start Behavioural Theories, 2 Factor approach, Fiedler's Theory.

Complete workbook exercise - "Assessing a Leadership Situation"
Weeks 8 & 9 Starts 6 May 2019 Meetings: Session Week 8 and Week 9
(Week 9 begins on 13 May 2019)
Students must attend both sessions. In addition to delivering a group

presentation every individual standard mode student must also complete
separate subject activities during the meetings these are part of the
standard mode group presentation assessment task.
Over the duration of these two weeks students must study the Guest
lecture by Ross Fowler via the resources on UTSOnline (an audio file
and power point file). A UTSOnline forum discussion of Ross' lecture will
be set as an out of class subject activity.
Week 10 Starts 20 May 2019 Meeting: Session Week 10
Topic: Spend 30 minutes on class activity Centralising Purchasing.

Introduce Vroom and Yetton's Decision Process Flow Chart. Situational
Leadership.
Week 11 Starts 27 May 2019 Meeting: Session Week 11
Topic: Belbin's Team Role Theory.
Week 12 Starts 3 Jun 2019 Meeting: Session Week 12
Topic: Path Goal Theory, LMX, Management and Leadership - the early
steps Tom's views
Stuvac 10 Jun 2019 Final Stuvac (SVF)

Note: Extension Topics
For those students who would like to explore the area of leadership and
responsibility in greater depth than the subject curriculum allows
resources for a number of additional topics will be provided as possible
personal interest extension study. Examples include:
Extension Topic 1 "Managing your career to prepare for Leadership"
Extension Topic 2 "Leadership of Teams Delivering Major

Infrastructure Projects"
Extension Topic 3 "Leadership in Large Organisations"
Additional subject costs

Provided a student is willing to use electronic copies the additional subject costs are relatively minimal, at the time of
publication the approximate cost of the popular book "Covey" used for one of the assignment tasks (refer "Required
texts") was $25.
Assessment
There is a separate Subject Outline for Standard Mode students and separate one for Distance Mode students. Ensure
you a using the outline that aligns with your enrolment status, this is particularly important with regard to the
assessment tasks.
1. Tasks
All assessment tasks must be completed and submitted by the stated dates. A pass in the subject is achieved by
gaining a total of 50 marks.
1.1 Standard mode students must complete:

Critical Analysis Assignment: An individual assignment,
Group presentation (Face to Face attendance mode students only): a group assignment requiring extensive
collaboration with one other student,
Response paper An individual assignment,and
Subject participation (Face to Face attendance mode students only); activities which may be individual or group
based.
1.2 Distance students must complete:

Critical Analysis Assignment: An individual assignment,
Leader Case Study (Distance mode students only): An individual assignment,
Response paper An individual assignment,and
Subject Participation (Distance mode students only): activities which may be individual or group based.
2. Submission
All assessment tasks must be submitted by the relevant due dates stated in this Outline. Marks are awarded for the
work completed by the due date so students must submit what they have completed by the deadline independent of
whether the work is finished, meets requirements or is to the standard they desire.
2.1 Individual Assignments
All Individual assignments are to be submitted electronically through UTSOnline. Your submission file must be named
“FAMILYNAMESID” (eg JAYWAL12565044). The first page of the submission must be a Standard Mode or Distance
Mode cover sheet in keeping with your subject enrollment status. Note: the Distance Mode Leader Case Study
assignment has two separate submission components.
2.2 Standard Mode Group Talk
The Standard Mode Group talk assignment has two submission components. Only one student from the group should
submit the various components of the assignment:

The group power point file must be submitted by email to tom.anderson@uts.edu.au, the file must be named
“groupnumberL&Rclassday” eg (36L&Rtuesday). The group number and each student’s details must be shown on
the first slide. You must check your file for viruses before submitting, any file that has a virus will not be opened and
accordingly will not be accepted. (It is also possible files with a virus may not reach the instructor as the University
firewalls may reject them).
The two page essay must be submitted electronically through UTSOnline. The file must also be named
“groupnumbeL&Rclassday” eg (36L&Rtuesday). The submission must have a Standard Mode Group Talk cover
sheet showing details of all members of the group.
All assignments must be typed. Copies of cover sheets are included in Appendix 1 of the Supplementary Instructions
and electronic copies are available on UTSOnline. Students or groups failing to submit electronic copies correctly will
not have their work marked. It is advisable to keep a copy of your submitted assignment. Great care is taken in
processing submitted assignments, but in the event of an assignment being lost it is the student’s responsibility to
provide an extra copy.
Students must not submit drafts of assignments for other subjects to the 49069 UTSOnline site.
3. Extensions
For late submission policy please see "Faculty Procedure and Advice" section.
4. Assignment return
It is intended to post assignment marks in the gradebook within four weeks of assignment receipt.
Students may not rewrite or resubmit assignments.
Assessment task 1: Critical Analysis Assignment

Objective(s): This assessment task addresses the following subject learning objectives (SLOs):
1 and 2
This assessment task contributes to the development of the following course intended learning
outcomes (CILOs):
A.5, B.6, C.1, D.1, E.1, F.2 and F.3
Type: Report
Groupwork: Individual
Weight: 15%
Task: STANDARD and DISTANCE MODE
The Reading Material book (RM) contains Recommended Readings and four sections of Topic
Readings.
The topic readings section: Section 3 Leadership: Power and Corruption (pages 299 to 366) is to be
used for the Autumn 2019 assessment task. The section contains five articles (Reading 3.1 through
to Reading 3.5), students should read the articles and then must choose one of them and complete a
detailed critical analysis of that chosen paper.
You may refer to other articles (correctly referenced) in the Reading Material book or other recent
peer reviewed journal papers. If you rely substantially on a paper not included in the RM you must
attach a copy of the paper as an appendix to your assignment.
You must avoid opinion; do provide logical, considered reasons for your analysis of the paper’s
approach to its subject, assertions and conclusions. Identify the key ideas and concepts being put
forward by the author. Rigorously consider the relevance, validity, consistency and logic of the
evidence provided by the author to justify his/her ideas or to support the conclusions reached.
Discuss any identifiable bias or motive that may have coloured the author’s approach or influenced

the formulation of the conclusions.
Applications or relevant knowledge from other sources may be used in this discussion provided they
are completely referenced. Original and thoughtful comment well substantiated will be highly
regarded. Good presentation, structured organisation of the content and clarity of writing are basic
expectations for a satisfactory report.
Length: 1200 words
Due: Friday 5th April 2019 before 11.59 pm (midnight). See submission information set out in sub-clause
"2 Submission" under the heading "Assessment" above. Students must submit what they have
completed by the deadline.
Criteria Criteria Weight (%) SLOs CILOs

linkages:
Compliance with the assignment brief. 100 1, 2 A.5, B.6, C.1, D.1,
Demonstrated knowledge and E.1, F.2, F.3
understanding of relevant subject topic(s).
Clear shown capacity to develop and
present argument and analysis of high
quality and a capacity to draw
conclusions. Demonstrated clarity and
coherence of writing style. Appropriate
referencing. On-time submission.
SLOs: subject learning objectives

CILOs: course intended learning outcomes
Further A key subject learning requirement/objective is the development and application of critical thinking.
information: Early in the session a few in class and out of class active learning tasks will require students to write
short critical responses. Open discussion of various responses will provide students with the
opportunity to develop an understanding of possible approaches and to gain feedback. Exemplar
responses to discussed and further potential practice exercises will be available on UTSOnline.
During the session feedback related to individual student enquiries will be provided beneath the “A1
Std/Dist Critical Analysis” navigation button on the L&R UTSOnline site.
Individual feedback will be provided when marks are released in the gradebook. Cohort performance
statistics will be posted on UTSOnline.
Assessment task 2: Group Presentation (Face to Face attendance mode students only)
1, 2 and 4
outcomes (CILOs):
A.5, B.6, D.1, E.1, E.2, F.2 and F.3
Type: Presentation
Groupwork: Group, group assessed
Weight: 20%
Task: STANDARD MODE

Task: STANDARD MODE
Students must form groups of two for the purpose of this assignment.
The group assignment requires the preparation of a group presentation and a short concise report.
This aspect of the assignment is group assessed. In addition, each student will be required to
undertake individual tasks during the presentation session - this is assessed individual (based on
satisfactory/not satisfactory) and may moderate the individual mark achieved.
Study a leader of your choice. Your leader may be either a real-life present day or historical person or
a leader-character featured in literature or film. You must provide appropriate referencing including
citing the novel or film if you choose a fictional character.
1. Write a maximum 900 word essay on the nature of this person and the nature of their influence:
What makes/made this person a successful leader? What can be learnt about leadership from a
thoughtful study of this person?
2. Prepare a Power-Point presentation based on your study and present this to the class on the date
allocated to you. You are required to attend all presentations given by fellow students.
.
The above components of the assignment are group assessed. In addition each students will be
required to undertake individual task(s) during the presentation meetings - this is assessed individual
(based on satisfactory/not satisfactory) and may moderate the individual mark achieved.
Penalties for failure to attend or failure to satisfactorily complete and submit individual tasks :
Failure to attend your group’s talk will result in zero individual marks for this assignment.
Arriving at one or more of your classes scheduled presentation meetings late or leaving early, will
result in significant individual marks deducted for this assignment.
Individual tasks must be submitted at the end of each of your classes presentation meetings, failure
to satisfactorily complete and submit these tasks will result in three (3) individual marks being
deducted for this assignment.
More detail is provided in "Further information" below
Length: The group verbal presentation is tightly time contrained. The group essay is limited 900 words in
length. Individual tasks undertaken during the presentation meeting will be limited in length and must
be submitted at the end of the meeting.
Due: Components are progressively submitted; the group must submit what they have completed by each
deadline. #1# >>> Due on Wednesday 1st May 2019: the electronic copy of the PowerPoint
presentation must be submitted by email to tom.anderson@uts.edu.au before 11:59 pm (midnight).
#2# >>> Due on Monday 6th May 2019: the two page essay to UTSOnline must be submitted before
11:59 pm (midnight). #3# >>> Presentation sessions will be held in class during both Week 8 and
Week 9. Students must attend for the full duration of each their classes. At the presentation session
no prior notice will be provided as to the order of delivery by the various groups - students must be at
the session and ready to deliver their talk when their group is requested to do so. PowerPoint file
submission/amendments on the day of the presentation will not be accepted. ### Note the
submission information set out in sub-clause "2 Submission" under the heading "Assessment" above.
The group must select a single member to submit the soft copy components to avoid duplication and
confusion. TURNITIN will identify 100% similarity if different group members make a submission, so it
is vital the same group member submits any draft (revision) and the final copy of the essay through
UTSOnline.

linkages:

linkages:
Compliance with assignment brief. Shown 100 1, 2, 4 A.5, B.6, D.1, E.1,
capacity to effectively work as a member E.2, F.2, F.3
of a group. Demonstrated knowledge and
understanding of chosen leader. Shown
capacity to concisely document and
present findings professionally. Ability to
communicate effectively to an audience of
peers. Demonstrated competence in
reviewing and critiquing the work and
presentations of peers. On time,
progressive delivery of set tasks.

Further (i) About task

information:
Your verbal class presentation:
A computer, data projector and remote slide changer/pointer will be available for student use on the
day of presentation; the presentations will be preloaded onto the computer. Amended files will not be
accepted on the day of presentation. Both members of the group must make an equal contribution to
the verbal presentation (ie about 2 min 30 seconds). An individual member dominating the
presentation time is indicative of poor planning and a lack of proper group rehearsal.
For the duration of the presentation meetings students must silence their mobile phones and have
them out of sight. Personal computers/tablets must also be put into bags.
Please remember that individual tasks must be completed during the meetings so there is no
opportunity to mentally rehearse your own speech during the class.
Your essay must be:
1. in an organised format, with brief introduction and conclusion

2. concise no more than 900 words long.
3. well structured and well written and convincing.
4. free of grammatical and typographical errors.
5. well referenced.
(The group provides a single essay)
The talk must be:
1. focused, succinct, and tell a coherent story;

2. pitched at the level of your peers, that is it must be understandable by students in the class;
3. delivered in a highly professional manner, each student’s component to the verbal presentation
must demonstrate significant prior preparation, organisation and practice. Students should not
read from notes or visual aids for any extended length of time. They are expected to communicate
with passion and confidence
4. interesting AND relate to and explain important concepts associated with good leadership;
5. stylish in presentation of introduction, evidence, and conclusions. The power point presentation
should not be a reproduction or simply a summary of the groups essay. It must be specifically
designed to accompany the verbal presentation adding emphasis and interest to the each
speaker’s words. It needs to be easy for the audience to read and easy to understand.
6. structured to clearly demonstrate the group has undertaken sound research.
7. well referenced, but not overly so; references on individual slides should be indicated as: (Author,
Year). On the last slide of your presentation supply a list of the most relevant references that were
essential to your talk (probably about 3).
.

(ii) About feedback
To assist students with the communication aspects of this assignment, opportunities will be available
in most classes for students to make short verbal contributions or to engage in small group
discussion. These activities aim to provide motivation, guidance and some early feedback
A collated list of selected feedback comments offered to students in the last two sessions will be
provided through UTSOnline.
During the session feedback related to student/group general enquiries will be provided beneath the
“A2 Std & Dist” navigation button on the Leadership and Responsibilty UTSOnline site.
As part of the assessment task students must peer review other groups work. A peer review report
package is collated and returned to each group in class. The feedback package contains four
sections, the assessors feedback, four student reviews that focus on academic content, five student
reviews that concentrate on preparation and performance and seven to ten peer reviews that
comment on general aspects of strengths and weaknesses.
Cohort performance statistics will be posted on UTSOnline.
Assessment task 3: Response paper

1, 2 and 3
outcomes (CILOs):
A.5, B.6, D.2, E.1, F.1, F.2 and F.3
Type: Report
Weight: 25%
Task: STANDARD and DISTANCE MODE
Write a personal response to Stephen Covey’s The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People.
Do not review or critically analyse the book. Do provide a personal response to the book’s ideas that
have particular interest to you and your professional experience. Express your opinon and reasoning,
do not use or quote others opinions. Focus on what you agee with, what you disagee with, what you
think might be valuable in your personal and professional life, what having studied the book you plan
to change and why.
Length: 2000 words
Due: Wednesday 5th June 2019 before 11.59 pm (midnight). See submission information set out in
sub-clause "2 Submission" under the heading "Assessment" above. Students must submit what they
have completed by the deadline.

linkages:

linkages:
Demonstrated competence formulating 100 1, 2, 3 A.5, B.6, D.2, E.1,
opinion(s) about the ideas and work of F.1, F.2, F.3
others. Shown capacity to drawn from
your own experience and the quality of
your insights into the distinctive features
of your own learning. A willingness and
capacity to engage in self-reflection and
personal development. Shown capacity to
present personal views professionally. On
time delivery.

Further A small number of exemplar response papers will be provided through UTSOnline.
information:
During the session feedback related to individual student enquiries will be provided beneath the “A3
Covey” navigation button on the L&R UTSOnline site.
Individual feedback will be provided when marks are released in the gradebook. Cohort performance
statistics will be posted on UTSOnline.
Assessment task 4: Subject Participation (Face to Face attendance mode students only)
1, 2 and 4
outcomes (CILOs):
A.5, B.6, D.1, D.2, E.1, F.2 and F.3
Type: Exercises
Weight: 40%
Task: STANDARD MODE
There is no formal examination for this subject. Three assessment tasks set at the beginning of the
study session, Critical Analysis, Group Presentation and Response Paper, must be returned on
stated dates. Continuous assessment of participation in subject based exercises provides the
remaining (fourth) assessment component.
Participation Mark Distribution: in general the 40 marks available for participation will be spread over
subject based activities as follows:
Web Debates (25 marks)
Class work/Subject Activities (10 marks);

Manager from Technocrat (5 marks);
Continuous formative feedback will be provided throughout the session (refer futher information
below). However, progressive marks will not be published. Student participation marks will be
released towards the middle of the examination period.
Web Debates

The "Web Debates" group activity will be introduced to all students through UTSOnline
announcements and small subject acivities. The debates program should begin in late Week 5 or
Week 6 (depending on enrolment stability) and will continue for the remainder of the session. This
complex activity will be entirely undertaken via UTSOnline and there are a number of navigation
buttons dedicated to web debates.
The Debates are the centre piece of “Participation” and consist of a set of seven Debates that occur
within a complex operational structure. Each student will be allocated to a seven-member debate
group and over the last six to eight weeks of the session seven debates will be held using UTSOnline
forums under the main Discussion Board and the Private Group discussion forums and
communication facilities.
At least one distance student is embedded in each debate group. The reason for this is in industry the
norm is increasingly for members of a team to be in at least three countries with collaboration taking
place using media technology. Technology’s impact on business models and organizational and
individual work practices are aspects that are raised both formally and informally by the debate
activity. One measurement of the success of a debate group is the level of engagement they achieve
with their “virtual” distance member(s)
Much of the value of the debates stems from the difficulty of organizing a disparate group of people, it
is a significant leadership challenge. The structure of this subject component has been carefully
designed so that every student has an opportunity to engage with and experience the various tasks.
(Two entirely independent sets of debates are used to maximise these opportunities. Every individual
student is scheduled to play a different role in each of the debates, they will be required to be a
leader or member of a subgroup in addition to their individual responsibilities). Many of the rules and
requirements have been chosen to necessitate the groups make operational decisions. The rules
continue to evolve and change debate by debate to ensure that each fresh leader must cope with
some variation.
One of the lessons that the debates brings home is the difficult of leadership - and the extreme
difficulty when as leader you have very limited formal power to fall back on. The debates also offer
an opportunity for the development of an understanding of how people from a different gender, from
different cultures, different technical backgrounds and in some cases, different age groups think. This
is likely to be invaluable experience in terms of personal development. Industry greatly values people
with a broad understanding of others.
The debate topics are not trivial; they raise issues all leaders and managers should all think about.
For some students, the debates will be an opportunity to gain confidence in expressing their opinions
– and defending them. By itself a potentially liberating experience.
There is much to learn about leadership from the debates by trying to do, practicing, observing others
and mimicking the things that seem to be valuable and avoiding the things that don’t.
Class work
Class work generally will be able to be completed within the contact meetings. The subject Workbook
will be the basis of most class work. The Workbook is intended to provide a record of your in-class
participation throughout the study session and will be used to assess your contribution of this aspect
to your class participation mark.
Subject Activities
Subject Activities must be undertaken outside contact meetings and will be progressively announced
on UTSonline with details provided beneath the "Subject Activities" navigation button.
Initial Subject Activities (Subject Activities #1 and #2)
Subject Activity #1: INDIVIDUAL HOME PAGE BLOG

As an initial activity you must complete your UTSOnline Home Page Blog providing a brief
introduction of yourself, a digital photograph and at least one favourite website link that tells the
reader something about your interests. It is essential that this activity is completed by the due date.
Details are provided under the Subject Activities navigation button on UTSOnline.
Due date: complete end of Session Week 2
Subject Activity #2: MANAGER FROM TECHNOCRAT
(This activty requires substantive effort and is accordingly provided with dedicated participation
marks.)
The activity has a number of components. The first step (Part 1) is to study carefully three papers and
develop your ideas on the material. I suggest you compile your ideas into a concise report of say 200
to 400 words. The report you prepare is not to be submitted it is for your reflective benefit. It should
however be of assistance in undertaking the second part of this activity.
Due date Part 1: complete by the begining of Session Week 3.
You will be advised of the second part after the contact meeting in Week 3.
The three papers are included as Appendix 3 in the Supplementary Instructions. Following is a brief
introduction to each and a suggested focus for your study:
Pirsig
The reading material is taken from “Zen and the Art of Motor Cycle Maintenance: An Inquiry into
Values”. The author, Robert Pirsig, began a college science course but increasingly became
interested in philosophical approaches. In his late thirties, Pirsig was institutionalised as mentally ill.
The book was written after his discharge whilst the author was attempting to “discover himself”. The
setting is a motorcycle trip across the USA that he embarks upon with his son Chris and two friends.
He adopts the name “Phaedras” when he reflects back on his life and illness. The book has
developed a cult following, particularly in technical/communication courses and has sold over 3 million
copies.
Study the extracted pages thoroughly and form an opinion on what main ideas Pirsig is promoting.
Posner
This paper, written by Barry Posner, an American academic, was published in the American “Project
Management Journal” in early 1987. It reports the author’s findings based on the analysis of 287
responses to a questionnaire.
Study this paper carefully. Identify the key ideas being put forward by Posner and rigorously consider
the relevance, consistency and validity of the evidence provided to justify his conclusions.
South
Peter South’s article was published in the Australian based “Electrical Engineer” in early 1991. It
describes the significant benefits that have accrued from a Government Authority pursuing a program
of replacing overseas sourced mechanical spare parts with local items.
Form an opinion on the merits of re-engineering and identify the factors that might be appropriate to
consider in formulating a policy approach
Further Subject Activities will be advised throughout the study session.
Due: Not applicable

Tasks together with their associated deadlines will be introduced throughout the study session. See
"Further information" below
Criteria: 1. Work ready, able to settle in quickly. Willingness and ability to tackle a variety of small and

Criteria: 1. Work ready, able to settle in quickly. Willingness and ability to tackle a variety of small and
medium size tasks outside technical domain.
2. Compliance with directions for a wide range of (seemingly) adhoc tasks
3. Demonstrated competence formulating personal opinion(s) about the ideas and work of others.
4. Clearly demonstrated understanding of power structures, business perspectives and social
practices and culture.
5. Clear ability to present written argument and/or discourse with considerable clarity and coherence.
6. A willingness and capacity to engage in self-reflection and personal development.
7. The appropriateness of your written submissions, that is style, grammar, spelling, and
paragraphing.
8. The extent and quality of your contributions to the relevant online discussions
9. On-time delivery

linkages:
Demonstrated competence in performing 100 1, 2, 4 A.5, B.6, D.1, D.2,
against the set of multiple dimensioned E.1, F.2, F.3
criteria

Further Submission requirements are progressive, due dates of components as specified throughout the
information: session of study.
Various forms of peer discussion, comment and review forms part of most participation tasks. The
coordinator will provide continuous generic feedback for most subject participation activities via
UTSOnline announcements.
For Subject Activity #1 “Home Page Blog”, anonymous examples of varying quality will be discussed
before the final due date as students begin to complete their blog. Later in the session this activity
leads into the formation of groups for “Online Debates” activities.
For all participation activities that require group collaboration, individuals and groups who have
genuine difficulties of understanding or operation will be aided. However, this assistance will attempt
to be framed in a way that encourages group members to work through their difficulties.
Cohort performance statistics will be posted on UTSOnline.
At the end of the session a virtual Debate Award ceremony will take place through UTSOnline. The
event recognises and provides performance analysis of high quality contributions from both groups
and individuals across nine categories as well as the announcement of the groups taking out the
“Overall Debate Winner” title and the two runner-up places.
Important notice about study patterns: The subject has been designed to encourage students to
engage with continuous learning, and accordingly there is no final examination. The educational
design results in significant weekly activities and students are expected to make a weekly time
commitment to these subject activities . The majority of subject activities are undertaken outside class
meeting times and are reported online. Because of the continuous learning requirements, the subject
will not suit students wishing to organise or limit their study to class attendance and three or four
concentrated time slots during the session.
Use of plagiarism detection software

Assignments are submitted through UTSOnline, however the subject uses "Turnitin", as a student personal review tool
and an electronic assignment plagarism detection system.
Guidance regarding Turnitin is provided beneath the "TURNITIN advice" button on the L&R UTSOnline site.
Suggested useful resources to assist you in understanding how to reference in academic writing and avoid plagiarism
can be found at

https://avoidingplagiarism.uts.edu.au
www.gsu.uts.edu.au/rules/student/section-16.html#r16.2
Required texts
Covey, Stephen R. (2004). The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People, Free Press, Simon & Schuster, New York. This
popular book which fits in the "self-help" genre is used as the basis for one of the assignments. It is not a subject "text
book".
Covey may be obtained from the Co-op Bookshop refer to http://www.coop-bookshop.com.au - students can order
online arrange to pick the book up from a store or have it mailed or delivered. The Co-op Bookshop has a general
store at 3 Broadway, City Campus as well as specialist stores on the Broadway campus. Refer to the Co-op web site
for further details and opening hours.
The book is also available from large general bookshops and some web book sellers.
References
The academic content of the subject predominantly consists of the leadership theories that underpin current
understanding. These are well documented in many standard texts, however as much as possible the subject
considers the theories through the academic lens of critical analysis. For those students wishing to study beyond the
"in class content" a text that appears to go some way towards being sympathetic with this approach is Nahauandi,
Afsaneh (2003). The Art and Science of Leadership, 3rd Ed. Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
Other resources
UTSOnline
The subject is very significantly supported by UTSOnline http://online.uts.edu.au/webapps/login/
Substantive subject advice will be provided progressively throughout the session via the subject’s UTSOnline site.
Many of the subject activities will be undertaken using the portal. Access to the site will be available to enrolled
students at the beginning of the transition week(s). Students enrolling after the start of the session will experience a
delay before access is granted.
The site is intended to be your resource and web interface. Please note that UTS prides itself as a place of learning
and tolerance. The University will take action to protect its reputation in this regard. Student behaviour within the
UTSOnline virtual portal should be in keeping with appropriate behaviour anywhere on the campus. Please be aware
that the University and the subject coordinator monitor the site and that the software supports extensive traceability of
activity.
Supplementary Instructions
The Supplementary Instructions document is posted on UTSOnline, it must be read in conjunction with the semester
specific Subject Outline.
The Reading Material (RM) and Lecture Support Notes (LSN) books.
The Reading Material book contains copies of journal papers or portions of key books. The papers are not necessarily
written by acknowledged experts in the field. The Reading Material aims to provide a broad glimpse of the vast array
of academic papers that have been published in the leadership area.
The Lecture Support Notes are provided as a resource additional to the RME. It intended to assist students in their
understanding of the key leadership theories and is one focus of the blended lecture series associated with the
subject. It has been organised to enable distance mode students to work through the material in a measured and
comprehensive manner particulally if used in conjuction with the audio files made available on UTSOnline.
Electronic copies of the RM and LSN are freely available to all enrolled students on UTSOnline.
Workbook
Students enrolled in the class will be issued a subject Workbook without cost. The Workbook must be returned at the
end of each class, it will be initially provided at an early class and then at relevant subsequent classes. The Workbook
will be the basis of numerous individual and collaborative activities undertaken throughout the class meetings. Aspects
of the workbook should helpful in understanding both the subject material and your individual characteristics and

attributes. The individually completed workbook will become the students personal property at the end of the session.
Distance students are able to download the workbook from UTSOnline to assist their self-study and self-assessment.
Graduate attribute development

For a full list of the faculty's graduate attributes and EA Stage 1 competencies, refer to the FEIT Graduate Attributes
webpage.
Assessment: faculty procedures and advice

Extensions
When, due to extenuating circumstances, you are unable to submit or present an assessment task on time, please
contact your subject coordinator before the assessment task is due to discuss an extension. Extensions may be
granted up to a maximum of 5 days (120 hours). In all cases you should have extensions confirmed in writing.
Special consideration
If you believe your performance in an assessment item or exam has been adversely affected by circumstances
beyond your control, such as a serious illness, loss or bereavement, hardship, trauma, or exceptional employment
demands, you may be eligible to apply for Special Consideration.
Late penalty
Work submitted late without an approved extension is subject to a late penalty of 10 per cent of the total available
marks deducted per calendar day that the assessment is overdue (e.g. if an assignment is out of 40 marks, and is
submitted (up to) 24 hours after the deadline without an extension, the student will have four marks deducted from
their awarded mark). Work submitted after five calendar days is not accepted and a mark of zero is awarded.
For some assessment tasks a late penalty may not be appropriate – these are clearly indicated in the subject outline.
Such assessments receive a mark of zero if not completed by/on the specified date. Examples include:
a. weekly online tests or laboratory work worth a small proportion of the subject mark, or
b. online quizzes where answers are released to students on completion, or
c. professional assessment tasks, where the intention is to create an authentic assessment that has an absolute
submission date, or
d. take-home papers that are assessed during a defined time period, or
e. pass/fail assessment tasks.
Querying results
If students wish to query their result in an individual assessment task or the final examination, the process to follow
can be found at Querying a mark or grade. The deadline is five working days from the date of release of the result.
If students wish to query their final overall result in a subject, they may request a review of final subject assessment
result. The deadline is five working days from the date of release of the result.
Academic liaison officer

Academic liaison officers (ALOs) are academic staff in each faculty who assist students experiencing difficulties in
their studies due to: disability and/or an ongoing health condition; carer responsibilities (e.g. being a primary carer for
small children or a family member with a disability); and pregnancy.
ALOs are responsible for approving adjustments to assessment arrangements for students in these categories.
Students who require adjustments due to disability and/or an ongoing health condition are requested to discuss their
situation with an accessibility consultant at the Accessibility Service before speaking to the relevant ALO.
The ALO for undergraduate students is:
Chris Wong
telephone +61 2 9514 4501
The ALO for postgraduate students is:
Dr Nham Tran
telephone +61 2 9514 4468
Statement about assessment procedures and advice

Statement about assessment procedures and advice
This subject outline must be read in conjunction with the policy and procedures for the assessment for coursework
subjects.
Statement on copyright
Teaching materials and resources provided to you at UTS are protected by copyright. You are not permitted to re-use
these for commercial purposes (including in kind benefit or gain) without permission of the copyright owner. Improper
or illegal use of teaching materials may lead to prosecution for copyright infringement.
Statement on plagiarism
Plagiarism and academic integrity
At UTS, plagiarism is defined in Rule 16.2.1(4) as: 'taking and using someone else's ideas or manner of expressing
them and passing them off as ... [their] own by failing to give appropriate acknowledgement of the source to seek to
gain an advantage by unfair means'.
The definition infers that if a source is appropriately referenced, the student's work will meet the required academic
standard. Plagiarism is a literary or an intellectual theft and is unacceptable both academically and professionally. It
can take a number of forms including but not limited to:
copying any section of text, no matter how brief, from a book, journal, article or other written source without duly
acknowledging the source
copying any map, diagram, table or figure without duly acknowledging the source
paraphrasing or otherwise using the ideas of another author without duly acknowledging the source
re-using sections of verbatim text without using quote marks to indicate the text was copied from the source (even if
a reference is given).
Other breaches of academic integrity that constitute cheating include but are not limited to:
submitting work that is not a student's own, copying from another student, recycling another student's work,
recycling previously submitted work, and working with another student in the same cohort in a manner that exceeds
the boundaries of legitimate cooperation
purchasing an assignment from a website and submitting it as original work
requesting or paying someone else to write original work, such as an assignment, essay or computer program, and
submitting it as original work.
Students who condone plagiarism and other breaches of academic integrity by allowing their work to be copied are
also subject to student misconduct Rules.
Where proven, plagiarism and other breaches of misconduct are penalised in accordance with UTS Student Rules
Section 16 – Student misconduct and appeals.
Avoiding plagiarism is one of the main reasons why the Faculty of Engineering and IT is insistent on the thorough and
appropriate referencing of all written work. Students may seek assistance regarding appropriate referencing through
UTS: HELPS.
Work submitted electronically may be subject to similarity detection software. Student work must be submitted in a
format able to be assessed by the software (e.g. doc, pdf (text files), rtf, html).
Further information about avoiding plagiarism at UTS is available.
Retention of student work

The University reserves the right to retain the original or one copy of any work executed and/or submitted by a student
as part of the course including, but not limited to, drawings, models, designs, plans and specifications, essays,
programs, reports and theses, for any of the purposes designated in Student Rule 3.9.2. Such retention is not to affect
any copyright or other intellectual property right that may exist in the student's work. Copies of student work may be
retained for a period of up to five years for course accreditation purposes. Students are advised to contact their subject
coordinator if they do not consent to the University retaining a copy of their work.
Statement on UTS email account

Email from the University to a student will only be sent to the student's UTS email address. Email sent from a student
to the University must be sent from the student's UTS email address. University staff will not respond to email from

any other email accounts for currently enrolled students.

2019 Autumn 49069 v3 Standard City 28-2-19

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Judul Asli

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

2019 Autumn 49069 v3 Standard City 28-2-19

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

SUBJECT OUTLINE

49069 Leadership and Responsibility

Telephone: 9514 2639

Subject learning objectives (SLOs)

28/02/2019 (Autumn 2019) © University of Technology Sydney Page 1 of 21

Contribution to the development of graduate attributes

Teaching and learning strategies

Student learning in the subject is facilitated by a combination of:

2. Contact meetings that incorporate:

28/02/2019 (Autumn 2019) © University of Technology Sydney Page 2 of 21

28/02/2019 (Autumn 2019) © University of Technology Sydney Page 3 of 21

The subject announcement page on UTSOnline will provide a

28/02/2019 (Autumn 2019) © University of Technology Sydney Page 4 of 21

Read the welcome message and all current announcements posted on

Students should attempt the short disgnostic test "Management

Download the 49069 Leadership and Responsibility “Subject Outline”

Obtain or be aware of the Covey "text-book" it can be purchased from

You should be browsing through the various resources on the 49069

Continue to check regularly for new announcement posted on

The subject is supported by a “Reading Materials” book and a “Lecture

Students should ensure they have a sound understanding of the

Topic: Introduction to subject. In class Haiku activity completed and

Post meeting activity and reading: Students must complete Subject

Week 2 Starts 18 Mar 2019 Meeting: Session Week 2

Topic: Topic: Critical Analysis. Session topic to be completed however

Post meeting activity and reading: ​Continue Subject Activity #2 by

28/02/2019 (Autumn 2019) © University of Technology Sydney Page 5 of 21

Study the self-learning material titled "Manager from Technocrat".

Week 3 Starts 25 Mar 2019 Meeting: Session Week 3

Topic: Start Leadership Theory, complete Part 1 “Introductory

Week 4 Starts 1 Apr 2019 Meeting: Session Week 4

Topic: Preliminary “Debate Groups” established. A class activity on

Post meeting work: Subject Activity # 3 must now be undertaken. Each

Week 5 Start 8 Apr 2019 Meeting: Semester Week 5

Topic: A mini debate based on the topic of "Obsolescence" undertaken

Debate Groups finalised.

28/02/2019 (Autumn 2019) © University of Technology Sydney Page 6 of 21

Topic: Complete self-monitoring and self-awareness. " Empathy

Stuvac Starts 22 Apr 2019 Mid Session Stuvac (SVM)

Week 7 Starts 29 Apr 2019 Meeting: Session Week 7

Topic: Start Behavioural Theories, 2 Factor approach, Fiedler's Theory.

(Week 9 begins on 13 May 2019)

Students must attend both sessions. In addition to delivering a group

Week 10 Starts 20 May 2019 Meeting: Session Week 10

Topic: Spend 30 minutes on class activity Centralising Purchasing.

Week 11 Starts 27 May 2019 Meeting: Session Week 11

Topic: Belbin's Team Role Theory.

Week 12 Starts 3 Jun 2019 Meeting: Session Week 12

Stuvac 10 Jun 2019 Final Stuvac (SVF)

28/02/2019 (Autumn 2019) © University of Technology Sydney Page 7 of 21

Extension Topic 1 "Managing your career to prepare for Leadership"

Extension Topic 2 "Leadership of Teams Delivering Major

Extension Topic 3 "Leadership in Large Organisations"

Additional subject costs

1.1 Standard mode students must complete:

1.2 Distance students must complete:

2.1 Individual Assignments

2.2 Standard Mode Group Talk

28/02/2019 (Autumn 2019) © University of Technology Sydney Page 8 of 21

Students may not rewrite or resubmit assignments.

Assessment task 1: Critical Analysis Assignment

A.5, B.6, C.1, D.1, E.1, F.2 and F.3

Task: STANDARD and DISTANCE MODE

Post meeting activity and reading: Continue Subject Activity #2 by

Class work/Subject Activities (10 marks);