ARTICLE REVIEW’S FORM

Name :
Institution :
Title :
Topics :

Guideline 1 :
Introduction and Benefits of Research
No. Subject Note
1 Problems and phenomena are written clearly:
(Strong / Satisfactory / Weak)
2 Gaps, usefulness and urgency of research are
clearly written:
(Strong / Satisfactory / Weak)
3 Objectives, research questions and hypotheses are
written based on the gaps in knowledge that
currently exist:
(Strong / Satisfactory / Weak)
4 It is possible to improve the development of
scientific knowledge, concepts, methods or
technical capacities in the research field studied:
(Strong / Satisfactory / Weak)
Guideline 2 :
Research Methods and Literature Studies
5 Quality of research methods:
(Strong / Satisfactory / Weak)
6 The research method used is delivered in a
straightforward, solid, and clear manner :
(Strong / Satisfactory / Weak)
7 Study the literature used in accordance with the
objectives, analysis / discussion of the research and
delivered in a straightforward, solid, and
clear manner :
(Strong / Satisfactory / Weak)
Guideline 3:
Discussion
8 Objectivity argument. Avoiding sentence opinions
and personal opinions:
 (Strong / Satisfactory / Weak)
9 Using supporting data accompanied by references:
(Strong / Satisfactory / Weak)
10 Being able to elaborate on existing phenomena /
problems combined with the theories that have been
conveyed and supported by actual data:
(Strong / Satisfactory / Weak)
11 Overall, the strategy, methodology and analysis are
delivered with strong and appropriate reasons in
order to achieve the specific objectives of the study:
(Strong / Satisfactory / Weak)
12 The ability to predict and transfer ideas to be
adoptedor the results of implementing ideas:
(Strong / Satisfactory / Weak)
13 Explanation why the initial hypothesis is
appropriate or not in accordance with the results of
the study:
(Strong / Satisfactory / Weak)
Guideline 4:
Writing Presentation
14 Overall it was delivered correctly and well,
including the structure, clarity and readability of the
writing:
(Strong / Satisfactory / Weak)
15 Originality and novelty in the writing:
(Strong / Satisfactory / Weak)
16 Checker for plagiarism:
(Strong / Satisfactory / Weak)
Guideline 5:
Conclusion
17 The conclusions are submitted in a straightforward
manner according to the title, fulfilling the purpose
of the writing, and in harmony with the results of
the study :
(Strong / Satisfactory / Weak)
18 Convey the possibilities and opportunities for
further research / study:
(Strong / Satisfactory / Weak)
Guideline 6 :
 Abstract and Title
19 The abstract summarizes 4 abstract
elements: background, goals, methods,
and research results with a maximum of 300 words:
(Strong / Satisfactory / Weak)
20 The title is attractive and precisely describes
the ideas and research carried out:
(Strong / Satisfactory / Weak)
Guideline 7 :
Technical Writing
21 Spelling and grammar in accordance with the
General Guidelines English
spelling standardized and scientific:
(Strong / Satisfactory / Weak)
22 Solid sentence structure, clear, and not confusing :
(Strong / Satisfactory / Weak)
23 Terminology or terms are used consistently and
correctly in all writings:
(Strong / Satisfactory / Weak)
24 Compliance with the Guideline s Author or writing
guidelines:
(Strong / Satisfactory / Weak)
Guideline 8 :
Reference
25 References used are actual, according to the
contents of the writing and adequate:
(Strong / Satisfactory / Weak)
26 Writing references in the correct format:
(Strong / Satisfactory / Weak)
Note
27 Reviewers' comments and comments that have not
been included in the previous points:

28 Reviewer recommendations for this paper:

( Accept / Revision Required / Declined)