International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics

Volume 119 No. 17 2018, 3007-3013

ISSN: 1314-3395 (on-line version)
url: http://www.acadpubl.eu/hub/
Special Issue
http://www.acadpubl.eu/hub/

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF SEISMIC RESISTANCE STRUCTURE G+15

RESIDENTIAL BUILDING USING STAAD PRO

K. Prabin Kumar [1], M. Malyadri [2]

Assistant professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Saveetha University, Chennai - 602105,
Tamil Nadu, India.1
kprabin2393@gmail.com
UG Student, Department of Civil engineering, Saveetha University, Chennai -602105, Tamil
Nadu, India.2

Abstract: Now a day’s Multi storied buildings are becoming very popular in India. This project is being
designed in such a way that to accommodate a large number of families comfortably in a healthy environment. The
construction of these types of buildings in highly populated cities will be very useful to accommodate a huge number
of people within a smaller area. In this project work, an attempt has been made to design and analysis of G+15
Residential building with seismic resistance. This project work involves planning, analysis, designs, and drawings of
a typical multi-storied building. This project attempt has been made to Design and Analysis of a G+15 storied
building with seismic resistance. This project involves Planning, Analysis, and Design & Drawings. In
Analysis various load cases and load combinations are included in this project. R.C.C framed structure is
used for Multi storied buildings. Structural design is to be done using Limit state method.

Keywords: RCC, Seismic resistance, Modelling, Analysis, Design & STAAD PRO
Introduction:
A Multi storied buildings are designed for the Basic
needs for the public. These buildings are the shelter
for all the human being and help grow up the
infrastructure to the city. So we need a Residential
building to serve for the people. The main objective
of the project is to modify the general design
practice of a multi storied building with seismic
effect. The structural design should satisfy the
criterion of ultimate strength and serviceability. A
civil engineer must be familiar with planning,
analysis and design of framed structures. Hence it
was proposed to choose a problem, involving
analysis and design of multistoried framed structure
as the project work.
Planning:
The proposed three storied Residential building
consists of area of each floor is 13000sqft. A
building should be planned to make it comfortable,
economical and to meet all the requirements of the
people. The efforts of the planner should be to
obtain maximum comfort with limited available
resources. Functional, utility, cost, habits, taste,
requirements etc, should also be considered in
planning a building. The planning of this fifteen
storied building is so planned to meet out all the
above factors.
Ground floor plan:
The parking area in the ground floor is 13000sqft. We
are going to provide landscape in the open space
provided at the centre of the building in order to
provide good recreation and entertainment of
people.
Typical plan of fifteen floors:
In this floor we have Entrance with foyer, Living,
Dining, Pooja room, Bed room, service room,
kitchen and Bath room & toilet, etc. and the total
area is about 13000sqft. The soil at the site is hard soil
having a safe bearing of 200KN/m2 in
Thandalam. The size of the plot is 15000sqft.

3007
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue

Methodology: Typical floor plan:

Ground floor plan: Typical plan (Apartment):

3008
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue

Structural analysis: STAAD Modelling and Analysis:

Material:
Grade of reinforcement : Fe415
Grade of concrete : M25
Density of concrete : 2500Kg/m3

Load calculation:
Dead load:
Floor level except ground floor (per m width)
Load from slab = 0.15x 25 = 3.75KN/m2
Partitions (Floor) = 0.23 x 2.70 x 20 =12.42 KN/m
Partitions (Terrace) =0.23 x 1.00 x 20 =4.60 KN/m
Floor finishes = 1.00KN/m2
Floor finishes (Terrace floor) = 2.00KN/m2

Live load:
Uniform distributed load (UDL) = 3.00KN/m2

Seismic load:
The following Seismic parameters were taken in
accordance with IS: 1893 (Part 1) – 2002.
Design horizontal seismic coefficient:

Ah = Z I Sa / 2 R g

For design consideration the building is situated

Zone III and medium soil location.

Load combinations:
DL + LL
DL + SL (+X)
DL + SL (-X)
DL + SL (+Z)
DL + SL (-Z)
DL + LL + SL (+X)
DL + LL + SL (-X)
DL + LL + SL (+Z)
DL + LL + SL (-Z)

3009
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue

Structural design:
Design of Slab:
Size of room (Living) = 3.20 x 5.50m
Lx = 3.20m, Ly = 5.50m
Aspect ratio: Ly/Lx = 5.50/3.20 = 1.72
This ratio is less than 2. The slab is to be designed
as slab spanning in two directions.
Depth of slab = 120mm
Shorter span:
Positive moment at mid span = 5.14kNm
Negative moment at support = 6.86 kNm
Longer span:
Positive moment at mid span = 2.74 kNm
Negative moment at support = 3.66 kNm
Results:
Shorter span:
Mid span - use 8mmφ RTS @ 300mm c/c
Support - use 8mmφ RTS @ 250mm c/c
Longer span:
Mid span - use 8mmφ RTS @ 300mm c/c
Support - use 8mmφ RTS @ 300mm c/c

3010
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue

Design of beam: Axial load = 3938.92 kN

From the STAAD Pro Analysis done we obtain the Reduced Moment =1285.97 kN.m

maximum positive moment, maximum negative Safe bearing capacity of soil = 200kN/m2
Total Length of Pile = 6m
moment and maximum shear force
Length of Pile Over Ground Level, L1 = 0.50 m
Negative moment = 69.87 kNm
Diameter of Pile = 1200 mm
Positive moment = 252.94 kNm
Modulus of Elasticity = 25491.17 N/mm2
Maximum shear force Vu =224.57 kN
Pile Head Condition = Fixed
Width of Beam = 300 mm
Required Percentage of Steel = 0.40%
Over all depth of Beam = 550 mm
Minimum Percentage of Steel = 0.40%
Thickness of slab, Df = 120 mm
Minimum % of Steel > Reqd. %, So, Minimum %
Length of the Beam, L = 3430 mm
of Steel provided
Results:
Required Area of Steel = 4523.89 mm2
Provide 2 nos of bars #16 at the top face at support
Dia of Main Reinforcement = 25.00 mm
of span section.
Area of Main Reinforcement = 490.87 mm2
Provide 3 nos of bars #25 at the Bottom
Total no. of Bars required = 10.00
tension face at centre of span section.
Total no. of Bars Provided. = 10.00
Provide 8mm bars @ 2 legged vertical stirrups
Area of Steel Provided. = 4908.74 mm2
at
Percentage of Steel Provided = 0.43
140 mm c/c

Conclusion:
Design of column:
Our project deals with design and analysis of G+15
From the STAAD Pro Analysis done we obtain the
Residential building with seismic resistance using
maximum positive moment, maximum negative
Staad Pro. This Residential building having all
moment and maximum shear force
facilities like Entrance with Living, Dining, Pooja
Factored load Pu = 6105.6 kN Factored
room, Bed room, Dressing room, Study room,
Moment Muz = 14.32 kN.m Factored
Guest room, kitchen and Bath room & toilet, etc.
Moment Muy = 14.32 kN.m Columns were
with very good water supply and sanitary
designed as bi-axially loaded Results:
arrangements. In this project, the Analysis of frame is
Breadth of column = 600mm
done by stiffness matrix method using Staad Pro
Depth of column = 600mm
Software. Design of footings, columns, beams &
Main reinforcement:
slabs are done manually by limit state method as
Provide 16nos. of 32mm bars
per IS456 – 2000, IS 875, IS1893 and SP16.
Lateral reinforcement:
Provide 8mm # 300mm c/c as lateral ties.
References:
1.Theory of structures Dhahpat Rai & sons -
Design of Foundation:
Ramamrutham
The Column footings are designed as pile
2.Design of Reinforce d concrete Tata McGraw
foundation. From the STAAD Pro analysis done we
Hill - SN Sinha
obtain the axial load for the designing of pile
3.Design of Reinforced Structure - N. Krishnaraju
foundation.

3011
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue

4.Indian standard code of practice for Reinforced

Concrete IS: 456 – 2000
5.Design Aids for Reinforced concrete to,
SP: 16-1978
6.Design loads for Reinforced concrete to
IS: 875 – part-I, IS: 875 – part-II
7.Influence of Shear Reinforcement on Reinforced
Concrete Continuous Beams - Yang, Keun-Hyeok;
Chung, Heon-Soo; Ashour, Ashraf FI, July 1, 2007
8.Where is Shear Reinforcement Required? Review
of Research Results and Design Procedures -
Collins, Michael P;Bentz, Evan C; Sherwood,
Edward G, 2008,
9.Impact buckling of beams in pure bending - J. F.
DAVIDSON. 2010.
10.Load capacity of reinforced concrete continuous
beams - K.H.Yang and A.F.Ashour Assistant
Professor, 2011.

3012
3013
3014