REPORTABLE
VERSUS
JUDGMENT
Leave granted.
1 “NCDRC”
2 “SCDRC”
2
also claimed.
also been urged that the SCDRC in the course of its decision
period and it was not certain when the Row house would be
it was urged that the interest awarded by the NCDRC at the rate
cent from the date of default until the date of payment would
urged by the buyer that the agreement was one sided. The clause
which has been extracted in the earlier part of this order will
compensation.
grace period of six months. Even in 2011, when the buyer filed
2016. This was nearly seven years after the extended date for
sought before the SCDRC. There was in any event a prayer for
refund.
passed by the SCDRC and by the NCDRC for refund of moneys were
justified.
this Court shall be released out of the moneys which have been
order as to costs.
.............................J.
(DR. DHANANJAYA Y. CHANDRACHUD)
.............................J.
(HEMANT GUPTA)
NEW DELHI
MARCH 25, 2019
7
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
VERSUS
CORAM :
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Ravinder Narain, Adv.
Mr. Siddharth Banthia, Adv.
Mr. Rajat Gava, Adv.
Mr. Rajan Narain, AOR
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Supriya Bose, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Debajyoti Deb, Adv.
Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick, AOR
Ms. Goldy Goyel, Adv.