SKILL-ASSESSMENT EXERCISES
CHAPTER 1
1.1
1.2
zðz þ 1Þðz þ 2Þ
FðzÞ ¼
ðz 0:5Þðz 0:7Þðz 0:9Þ
ðzÞ ðz þ 1Þðz þ 2Þ
F ¼
z ðz 0:5Þðz 0:7Þðz 0:9Þ
z z z
¼ 46:875 114:75 þ 68:875
z 0:5 z 0:7 z 0:9
1
2 Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises
z z z
FðzÞ ¼ 46:875 114:75 þ 68:875
z 0:5 z 0:7 z 0:9
f(kT) ¼ 46.875(0.5)k 114.75(0.7)k + 68.875(0.9)k
CHAPTER 2
2.1
1
The Laplace transform of t is 2 using Table 2.1, Item 3. Using Table 2.2, Item 4,
1 s
FðsÞ ¼ 2
:
ðs þ 5Þ
2.2
Expanding F(s) by partial fractions yields:
A B C D
FðsÞ ¼ þ þ þ
s s þ 2 ðs þ 3Þ 2 ðs þ 3Þ
Where,
10
10 5
A¼ ¼ B¼ ¼ 5
ðs þ 2Þðs þ 3Þ2 S!0 9 sðs þ 3Þ2 S!2
10 10 2 dFðsÞ
40
C¼ ¼ ; and D ¼ ðs þ 3Þ ¼
sðs þ 2Þ 3 ds 9
S!3 s!3
Taking the inverse Laplace transform yields,
5 10 40
f ðtÞ ¼ 5e2t þ te3t þ e3t
9 3 9
2.3
Taking the Laplace transform of the differential equation assuming zero initial conditions
yields:
Collecting terms,
Thus,
CðsÞ s2 þ 4s þ 3
¼ 3
RðsÞ s þ 3s2 þ 7s þ 5
Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises 3
2.4
CðsÞ 2s þ 1
GðsÞ ¼ ¼ 2
RðsÞ s þ 6s þ 2
d2c dc dr
þ 6 þ 2c ¼ 2 þ r
dt 2 dt dt
2.5
1 s 1 A B C
CðsÞ ¼ RðsÞGðsÞ ¼ ¼ ¼ þ þ
s ðs þ 4Þðs þ 8Þ sðs þ 4Þðs þ 8Þ s ðs þ 4Þ ðs þ 8Þ
2
where
1 1 1 1
A¼ ¼ B ¼ ¼ ; and
ðs þ 4Þðs þ 8ÞS!0 32 sðs þ 8ÞS!4 16
1
C¼
sðs þ 4ÞS!8¼ 1
32
Thus,
1 1 1
cðtÞ ¼ e4t þ e8t
32 16 32
2.6
Mesh Analysis
Transforming the network yields,
Nodal Analysis
Writing the nodal equations,
1
þ 2 V1 ðsÞ VL ðsÞ ¼ V ðsÞ
s
2 1
V1 ðsÞ þ þ 1 VL ðsÞ ¼ V ðsÞ
s s
or
VL ðsÞ s2 þ 2s þ 1
¼
V ðsÞ s2 þ 5s þ 2
2.7
Inverting
Z2 ðsÞ 100000
GðsÞ ¼ ¼ ¼ s
Z1 ðsÞ ð105 =sÞ
Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises 5
Noninverting
105
½Z1 ðsÞ þ Z2 ðsÞ þ 105
GðsÞ ¼ ¼ s ¼sþ1
Z1 ðsÞ 105
s
2.8
Writing the equations of motion,
2.9
Writing the equations of motion,
ðs2 þ s þ 1Þu1 ðsÞ ðs þ 1Þu2 ðsÞ ¼ T ðsÞ
ðs þ 1Þu1 ðsÞ þ ð2s þ 2Þu2 ðsÞ ¼ 0
where u1 ðsÞ is the angular displacement of the inertia.
Solving for u2 ðsÞ;
ðs2 þ s þ 1Þ T ðsÞ
ðs þ 1Þ 0 ðs þ 1ÞFðsÞ
u2 ðsÞ ¼ 2 ¼ 3
ðs þ s þ 1Þ ðs þ 1Þ 2s þ 3s þ 2s þ 1
2
ðs þ 1Þ ð2s þ 2Þ
2.10
Transforming the network to one without gears by reflecting the 4 N-m/rad spring to the
left and multiplying by ð25=50Þ2 ; we obtain,
6 Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises
2.12
Letting
u1 ðsÞ ¼ v1 ðsÞ=s
u2 ðsÞ ¼ v2 ðsÞ=s
in Eqs. 2.127, we obtain
K K
J1 s þ D1 þ v1 ðsÞ v2 ðsÞ ¼ T ðsÞ
s s
K K
v1 ðsÞ þ J2 s þ D2 þ v2 ðsÞ
s s
From these equations we can draw both series and parallel analogs by considering these
to be mesh or nodal equations, respectively.
2.13
ðs þ 2ÞdvðsÞ ¼ IðsÞ
CHAPTER 3
3.1
1
Combine the parallel blocks in the forward path. Then, push to the left past the pick off
point. s
Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises 9
Combine the parallel feedback paths and get 2s. Then, apply the feedback formula,
s3 þ 1
simplify and get, TðsÞ ¼ 4 :
2s þ s2 þ 2s
3.2
GðsÞ 16
Find the closed-loop transfer function, T ðsÞ ¼ ¼ ; where
1 þ GðsÞHðsÞ s2 þ as þ 16
16 a
and GðsÞ ¼ and H(s) = 1. Thus, vn ¼ 4 and 2zvn ¼ a; from which z ¼ :
sðs þ aÞ 8
%
ln
100 a
But, for 5% overshoot, z ¼ sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
ffi ¼ 0:69: Since, z ¼ 8 ; a ¼ 5:52:
2 %
p2 þ ln
100
3.3
Label nodes.
Draw nodes.
10 Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises
3.4
3.5
The state equations are,
x_ 1 ¼ 2x1 þ x2
x_ 2 ¼ 3x2 þ x3
x_ 3 ¼ 3x1 4x2 5x3 þ r
y ¼ x2
Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises 11
3.6
From the transformation equations,
3 2
P1 ¼
1 4
Taking the inverse,
0:4 0:2
P¼
0:1 0:3
Now,
" #" #" # " #
3 2 1 3 0:4 0:2 6:5 8:5
P1 AP ¼ ¼
1 4
4 6 0:1 0:3 9:5 11:5
" #" # " #
3 2 1 3
P1 B ¼ ¼
1 4 3 11
" #
0:4 0:2
CP ¼ ½ 1 4 ¼ ½ 0:8 1:4
0:1 0:3
Therefore,
" # " #
6:5 8:5 3
z_ ¼ zþ u
9:5 11:5 11
y ¼ ½ 0:8 1:4 z
3.7
First find the eigenvalues.
l 0 1 3 l 1 3
jlI Aj ¼ ¼ ¼ l2 þ 5l þ 6
0 l 4 6 4 l þ 6
12 Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises
Finally,
2 0 18:39
z_ ¼ zþ u
0 3 20
y ¼ ½ 2:121 2:6 z
CHAPTER 4
4.1
4.2
1 1 4 4 2:2 2:2
Since a ¼ 50; Tc ¼ ¼ ¼ 0:02s; Ts ¼ ¼ ¼ 0:08s; and Tr ¼ ¼ ¼
0:044 s: a 50 a 50 a 50
4.3
4.4
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
a. vn ¼ 400 ¼ 20 and 2zvn ¼ 12; ; z ¼ 0.3 and system is underdamped.
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
b. vn ¼ 900 ¼ 30 and 2zvn ¼ 90; ; z ¼ 1.5 and system is overdamped.
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
c. vn ¼ 225 ¼ 15 and 2zvn ¼ 30; ; z ¼ 1 and system is critically damped.
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
d. vn ¼ 625 ¼ 25 and 2zvn ¼ 0; ; z ¼ 0 and system is undamped.
4.5
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
vn ¼ 361 ¼ 19 and 2zvn ¼ 16; ; z ¼ 0:421:
4 p
Now, Ts ¼ ¼ 0:5 s and Tp ¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ¼ 0:182 s:
zvn vn 1 z 2
From Figure 4.16, vn Tr ¼ 1:4998: Therefore, Tr ¼ 0:079 s:
pffi
zp
Finally, %os ¼ e 1z 2 100 ¼ 23:3%
4.6
a. The second-order approximation is valid, since the dominant poles have a real part of
2 and the higher-order pole is at 15, i.e. more than five-times further.
b. The second-order approximation is not valid, since the dominant poles have a
real part of 1 and the higher-order pole is at 4, i.e. not more than five-times
further.
4.7
1 0:8942 1:5918 0:3023
a. Expanding G(s) by partial fractions yields GðsÞ ¼ þ :
s s þ 20 s þ 10 s þ 6:5
But –0.3023 is not an order of magnitude less than residues of second-order terms
(term 2 and 3). Therefore, a second-order approximation is not valid.
14 Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises
4.8
See Figure 4.31 in the textbook for the Simulink block diagram and the output
responses.
4.9
From the second-order term in the denominator, we see that the system is unstable.
Instability could also be determined using the Routh-Hurwitz criteria on the denominator
of T(s). Since the system is unstable, calculations about steady-state error cannot be made.
4.10
b.
1 1
estep ð1Þ ¼ ¼ ¼ 7:8e 03
1 þ lim GðsÞ 1 þ 127
s!0
1 1
eramp ð1Þ ¼ ¼ ¼1
lim sGðsÞ 0
s!0
1 1
eparabola ð1Þ ¼ 2
¼ ¼1
lim s GðsÞ 0
s!0
4.11
System is stable for positive K. System is Type 0. Therefore, for a step input estep ð1Þ ¼
1 12K
¼ 0:1: Solving for Kp yields Kp ¼ 9 ¼ lim GðsÞ ¼ ; from which we
1 þ Kp s!0 14 18
obtain K ¼ 189.
4.12
ðs þ 2Þ
System is stable. Since G1 ðsÞ ¼ 1000; and G2 ðsÞ ¼ ;
ðs þ 4Þ
1 1
eD ð1Þ ¼ ¼ ¼ 9:98e 04
1 2 þ 1000
lim þ lim G1 ðsÞ
s!0 G2 ðsÞ s!0
4.13
1 s
System is stable. Create a unity-feedback system, where He ðsÞ ¼ 1¼ :
The system is as follows: sþ1 sþ1
Thus, 100
GðsÞ ðs þ 4Þ 100ðs þ 1Þ
Ge ðsÞ ¼ ¼ ¼ 2
1 þ GðsÞHe ðsÞ 100s s 95s þ 4
1
ðs þ 1Þðs þ 4Þ
4.14
Kðs þ 7Þ 1 1 10
Since GðsÞ ¼ ; eð1Þ ¼ ¼ ¼ :
s2 þ 2s þ 10 1 þ Kp 7K 10 þ 7K
1þ
10
Calculating the sensitivity, we get
K @e K ð10Þ7 7K
Se:K ¼ ¼ ¼
e @K 10 ð10 þ 7KÞ 2 10 þ 7K
10 þ 7K
4.15
Given
0 1 0 1
A¼ ; B¼ ; C ¼ ½1 1 ; RðsÞ ¼ :
3 6 1 s
Using the final value theorem,
" 1 #
1 s 1 0
estep ð1Þ ¼ lim sRðsÞ½1 CðsI AÞ B ¼ lim 1 ½ 1 1
s!0 s!0 3 sþ6 1
2 3
sþ6 1
6 3s s 0 7 7 ¼ lim s þ 5s þ 2 ¼ 2
2
¼ lim 61 ½ 1 1
s!04 s2 þ 6s þ 3 1 5 s!0 s2 þ 6s þ 3 3
CHAPTER 5
5.1
s7 3 6 7 2
s6 9 4 8 6
s5 4.666666667 4.333333333 0 0
s4 –4.35714286 8 6 0
s3 12.90163934 6.426229508 0 0
s2 10.17026684 6 0 0
s1 –1.18515742 0 0 0
s0 6 0 0 0
Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises 17
Since there are four sign changes and no complete row of zeros, there are four right half-
plane poles and three left half-plane poles.
5.2
Make a Routh table. We encounter a row of zeros on the s3 row. The even polynomial is
contained in the previous row as 6s4 þ 0s2 þ 6: Taking the derivative yields 24s3 þ
0s: Replacing the row of zeros with the coefficients of the derivative yields the s3 row. We
also encounter a zero in the first column at the s2 row. We replace the zero with e and
continue the table. The final result is shown now as
s6 1 –6 –1 6
s5 1 0 –1 0
s4 6 0 6 0
s3 –24 0 0 0 ROZ
s2 e 6 0 0
s1 144/e 0 0 0
s0 6 0 0 0
There is one sign change below the even polynomial. Thus the even polynomial
(4th order) has one right half-plane pole, one left half-plane pole, and 2 imaginary axis
poles. From the top of the table down to the even polynomial yields one sign change.
Thus, the rest of the polynomial has one right half-plane root, and one left half-plane root.
The total for the system is two right half-plane poles, two left half-plane poles, and
2 imaginary poles.
5.3
Kðs þ 20Þ GðsÞ Kðs þ 20Þ
Since GðsÞ ¼ ; T ðsÞ ¼ ¼ 3
sðs þ 2Þðs þ 3Þ 1 þ GðsÞ s þ 5s þ ð6 þ KÞs þ 20K
2
From the s1 row, K < 2. From the s0 row, K > 0. Thus, for stability, 0 < K < 2.
CHAPTER 6
6.1
a.
ð7 þ j9 þ 2Þð7 þ j9 þ 4Þ0:0339 ð5 þ j9Þð3 þ j9Þ
Fð7 þ j9Þ ¼ ¼
ð7 þ j9Þð7 þ j9 þ 3Þð7 þ j9 þ 6Þ ð7 þ j9Þð4 þ j9Þð1 þ j9Þ
ð66 j72Þ
¼ ¼ 0:0339 j0:0899 ¼ 0:096 < 110:7
ð944 j378Þ
18 Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises
6.3
6.4
a.
20 Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises
b. Using the Routh-Hurwitz criteria, we first find the closed-loop transfer function.
GðsÞ Kðs þ 2Þ
T ðsÞ ¼ ¼ 2
1 þ GðsÞ s þ ðK 4Þs þ ð2K þ 13Þ
s2 1 2K + 13
s1 K – 40 0
s0 2K + 13 0
At the point e close to the complex pole, the angles must add up to zero. Hence, angle
– angle from pole in 4 quadrant – angle from pole in 1 quadrant = 180 , or
th st
from zero
3
tan1 90 u ¼ 180 . Solving for the angle of departure, u = – 233.1.
4
Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises 21
6.5
a.
b. Search along the imaginary axis and find the 180° point at s = j4.06
c. For the result in part (b), K ¼ 1.
d. Searching between 2 and 4 on the real axis for the minimum gain yields the break-in at
s ¼ 2.89.
e. Searching along z ¼ 0.5 for the 180° point we find s ¼ –2.42 þ j4.18
f. For the result in part (e), K ¼ 0.108.
g. Using the result from part (c) and the root locus, K < 1.
6.6
a.
22 Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises
b. Searching along the z ¼ 0591 (10% overshoot) line for the 180° point yields 2.028 þ
j2.768 with K ¼ 45.55.
4 4 p p
c. Ts ¼ ¼ ¼ 1:97s; Tp ¼ ¼ ¼ 1:13s; vn Tr ¼ 1:8346 from the
jRej 2:028 jImj 2:768
rise-time chart and graph in Chapter 4. Since vn is the radial distance to the pole,
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
vn ¼ 2:0282 þ 2:7682 ¼ 3:431:Thus, Tr ¼ 0:53 s; since the system is Type 0,
K 45:55
Kp ¼ ¼ ¼ 0949:Thus,
2 4 6 48
1
estep ð1Þ ¼ ¼ 0:51
1 þ Kp
d. Searching the real axis to the left of 6 for the point whose gain is 45.55 we find 7.94
Comparing this value to the real part of the dominant pole, 2.028,we find that it is not
five times further. The second-order approximation is not valid.
6.7
Find the closed-loop transfer function and put it the form that yields pi as the root locus
variable. Thus,
100
¼ s þ 100
GðsÞ 100 100 2
T ðsÞ ¼ ¼ ¼
1 þ GðsÞ s2 þ pi s þ 100 ðs2 þ 100Þ þ pi s 1 þ pi s
s2 þ 100
pi s
Hence, KGðsÞHðsÞ ¼ 2 : The following shows the root locus.
s þ 100
6.8
Following the rules for plotting the root locus of positive-feedback systems, we obtain
the following root locus:
Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises 23
6.9
Kðs þ 1Þ
The closed-loop transfer function is T ðsÞ ¼ 2 . Differentiating the
denominator with respect to K yields s þ ðK þ 2Þs þ K
@s @s @s
2s þ ðK þ 2Þ þ ðs þ 1Þ ¼ ð2s þ K þ 2Þ þ ðs þ 1Þ ¼ 0
@K @K @K
@s @s ðs þ 1Þ K @s Kðs þ 1Þ
Solving for 0
we get ¼ . Thus Ss:K ¼ ¼ .
@K @K ð2s þ K þ 2Þ s @K sð2s þ K þ 2Þ
10ðs þ 1Þ
Substituting K ¼ 20 yields Ss:K ¼ .
sðs þ 11Þ
Now find the closed-loop poles when K ¼ 20. From the denominator of T(s), s1,2 ¼
21.05, 0.95, when K ¼ 20.
CHAPTER 7
7.1
a.
1 1
GðsÞ ¼ ; GðjvÞ ¼
ðs þ 2Þðs þ 4Þ 8 þ v þ j6v
2
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
MðvÞ ¼ ð8 v2 Þ2 þ ð6vÞ2
pffiffiffiffi 1 6v
For v < 8; fðvÞ ¼ tan :
8 v2
pffiffiffiffi 6v
For v < 8; fðvÞ ¼ p þ tan1 :
8 v2
24 Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises
b.
c.
Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises 25
7.2.
7.3
The frequency response is 1 /8 at an angle of zero degrees at v ¼ 0. Each pole rotates 90
in going from v ¼ 0 to v ¼1. Thus, the resultant rotates 180 while its magnitude goes
to zero. The result is shown below.
7.4.
a. The frequency response is 1/48 at an angle of zero degrees at v ¼ 0. Each pole rotates
90 in going from v ¼ 0 to v ¼ 1. Thus, the resultant rotates 270 while its
magnitude goes to zero. The result is shown below.
26 Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises
1 1
b. Substituting jv into GðsÞ ¼ ¼ 3 and
ðs þ 2Þðs þ 4Þðs þ 6Þ s þ 12s þ 44s þ 48
2
If K ¼ 100, the Nyquist diagram will intersect the real axis at 100/480. Thus, 480
480
GM ¼ 20 log ¼ 13:62 dB. From Skill-Assessment Exercise Solution l0.4, the 180
100
frequency is 6.63 rad/s.
7.6
a.
Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises 27
b. The phase angle is 180 at a frequency of 36.74 rad/s. At this frequency the gain is
99.67 dB. Therefore, 20 logK ¼ 99.67, or K ¼ 96,270. We conclude that the
system is stable for K < 96,270.
c. For K 10,000, the magnitude plot is moved up 201ogl0,000 ¼ 80 dB. Therefore,
the gain margin is 99.67 80 ¼ 19.67 dB. The 180 frequency is 36.7 rad/s. The gain
curve crosses 0 dB at v ¼ 7.74 rad/s, where the phase is 87.1 . We calculate the phase
margin to be 180 87.1 ¼ 92.9 .
7.7
1nð%=100Þ
Using z ¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ; We find z = 0.456, which corresponds to 20%
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
p2 þ 1n2 ð%100Þ qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
4
over-shoot. Using Ts ¼ 2; vBW ¼ ð1 2z Þ þ 4z4 4z 2 þ 2 ¼ 5:79rad=s:
2
Tsz
7.8
160 ð6750000101250v2 Þþj1350ðv2 1350Þv
For both parts find that GðjvÞ ¼ * v6 þ2925v4 þ1072500v2 þ25000000 .
27
For a range of values for v, superimpose Gðjv) on the a. M and N circles, and on the
b. Nichols chart.
a.
28 Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises
Plotting the closed-loop frequency response from a. or b. yields the following plot:
Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises 29
7.9
7.10
The initial slope is 40 dB/dec. Therefore, the system is Type 2. The initial slope intersects
0 dB at v ¼ 9.5 rad/s. Thus, Ka ¼ 9.52 ¼ 90.25 and Kp Kv ¼ 1.
7.11
10 10
a. Without delay, GðjvÞ ¼ ¼ ; from which the zero dB frequency is
ðjv þ 1Þ vðv þ jÞ
10 pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
found as follows: M ¼ 2 pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ¼ 1. Solving for v; v v2 þ 1 ¼ 10; or after
v vþ1
30 Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises
squaring both sides and rearranging, v4 þ v2 100 ¼ 0. Solving for the roots, v2
10.51, 9.51. Taking the square root of the positive root, we find the 0 dB frequency to
be 3.08 rad/s. At this frequency, the phase angle, f ¼ ffðv þ jÞ ¼ ffð3:08 þ jÞ
¼ 162 : Therefore the phase margin is 180 162 = 18 .
Therefore the phase margin is 180 179.65 = 0.35 . Thus, the system is stable.
c. With a delay of 3 s,
Therefore the phase margin is 28.59 180 ¼ 151.41 deg. Thus, the system is unstable.
7.12
Drawing judicially selected slopes on the magnitude and phase plot as shown below
yields a first estimate.
We see an initial slope on the magnitude plot of 20 dB/dec. We also see a final 20 dB/
dec slope with a break frequency around 21 rad/s. Thus, an initial estimate is
1
G1 ðsÞ ¼ . Subtracting G1(s) from the original frequency response yields the
sðs þ 21Þ
frequency response shown below.
Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises 31
Drawing judicially selected slopes on the magnitude and phase plot as shown yields a
final estimate. We see first-order zero behavior on the magnitude and phase plots with
a break frequency of about 5.7 rad/s and a dc gain of about 44 dB ¼ 20log(5.7K), or
K ¼ 27.8. Thus, we estimate G2(s) ¼ 27.8 (s þ 7). Thus, GðsÞ ¼ G1 ðsÞG2 ðsÞ ¼
27:8ð8 þ 5:7Þ
: It is interesting to note that the original problem was developed from
sðs þ 21Þ
30ðs þ 5Þ
GðsÞ ¼ .
sðs þ 20Þ
CHAPTER 8
8.1
dvC1 1 1 1 1
¼ vC þ iL vC þ vi
dt RC1 1 C1 RC1 2 RC1
diL 1 1
¼ vC1 þ vi
dt L L
dvC2 1 1 1
¼ vC vC vi
dt RC2 1 RC2 2 RC2
where the output equation is
vo ¼ vC2
Putting the equations in vector-matrix form,
2 1 1 1 3 2 1 3
6 RC1 C1 RC1 7 6 RC1 7
6 7 6 7
6 1 7 6 1 7
x¼6 6 0 7 6
0 7x þ 6 7vi ðtÞ
7
6 L 7 6 L 7
4 1 1 5 4 1 5
0
RC2 RC2 RC2
y ¼ ½ 0 0 1x
8.2
z1 ¼ x1 ; z2 ¼ x_ 1 ; z3 ¼ x2 ; z4 ¼ x_ 2 ; z5 ¼ x3 ; z6 ¼ x_ 3
Writing the state equations using the definition of the state variables and the inverse
transform of the differential equation,
z_ 1 ¼ z2
z_ 2 ¼ €x1 ¼ _x1 x1 þ x_ 2 þ f ¼ z2 z1 þ z4 þ f
z_ 3 ¼ x_ 2 ¼ z4
z_ 4 ¼ €x2 ¼ x_ 1 x_ 2 x2 þ x3 ¼ z2 z4 z3 þ z5
z_ 5 ¼ x_ 3 ¼ z6
z_ 6 ¼ €x3 ¼ _x3 x3 þ x2 ¼ z6 z5 þ z3
The output is z5 : Hence, y ¼ z5 : In vector-matrix form,
2 3 2 3
0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 1 1 0 7 6 7
6 1 0 0 7 617
6 0 0 0 1 0 0 77 6 07
z_ ¼ 6
6 0 7 z þ6
6
7f ðtÞ; y ¼ ½ 0 0 0 0 1 0z
7
6 1 1 1 1 0 7 607
4 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 4 05
0 0 1 0 1 1 0
8.3
First derive the state equations for the transfer function without zeros.
X ðsÞ 1
¼ 2
RðsÞ s þ 7s þ 9
Cross multiplying yields
Taking the inverse Laplace transform assuming zero initial conditions, we get
€x þ 7_x þ 9x ¼ r
c ¼ 2_x þ x ¼ x1 þ 2x2
34 Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises
8.5
The state equation is converted to a transfer function using
where
4 1:5 2
A¼ ; B¼ ; and C ¼ ½ 1:5 0:625 :
4 0 0
8.6
Substituting Eq. (3) into Eq. (1) and performing the indicated differentiation gives us the
linearized intermediate differential equation,
d 2 dx
þ 4xo dx ¼ 2x2o þ 10 þ df ðtÞ ð4Þ
dt 2
The force of the spring at equilibrium is 10 N. Thus, since F ¼ 2x2 ; 10 ¼ 2x2o from
which
pffiffiffi
xo ¼ 5
Substituting this value of xo into Eq. (4) gives us the final linearized differential equation.
d 2 dx pffiffiffi
2
þ 4 5dx ¼ df ðtÞ
dt
Selecting the state variables,
x1 ¼ dx
x2 ¼ dx
Writing the state and output equations
x_ 1 ¼ x2 pffiffiffi
x_ 2 ¼ €dx ¼ 4 5x1 þ df ðtÞ
y ¼ x1
Converting to vector-matrix form yields the final result as
" # " #
0 1 0
x¼ pffiffiffi xþ df ðtÞ
4 5 0 1
y ¼ ½ 1 0 x
8.7
8.8
2 3
2 1 1
The controllability matrix is CM ¼ B AB A2 B ¼ 4 1 4 9 5. Since |CM| ¼ 80,
1 1 16
CM is full rank that is rank 3. We conclude that the system is controllable.
8.9
First check controllability.
2 3 The controllability matrix is CMz ¼ B AB A2 B ¼
0 0 1
4 0 1 17 5. Since jCM z j ¼ 1; CMz is full rank, that is rank 3. We conclude
1 9 81
that the system is controllable. Wenow find the desired characteristic equation. A 20%
%
log
100 4
overshoot requires z ¼ sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
ffi ¼ 0:456: Also, vn ¼ zT ¼ 4:386 rad/s.
% s
p2 þ log2
100
Thus, the characteristic equation is s2 þ 2zvn s þ v2n ¼ s2 þ 4s þ 19:24: Adding a pole
at 6 to cancel the zero at 6 yields the resulting desired characteristic equation,
ðs þ 6Þ sþ6
Since GðsÞ ¼ ¼ 3 ; We can write the
ðs þ 7Þðs þ 8Þðs þ 9Þ 2s þ 24s þ 191s þ 504
2
3 2 3
0 1 0 0
phase-variable representation as Ap ¼ 4 0 0 1 5; Bp ¼ 4 0 5; Cp ¼
504 191 24 1
[6 1 0] The compensated system matrix in phase-variable form is
2 3
0 1 0
Ap Bp Kp ¼ 4 0 0 1 5
ð504 þ k1 Þ ð191 þ k2 Þ ð24 þ k3 Þ
The characteristic equation for this system is | sI (Ap BpKp)| = s3 + (24 + k3)s2 + (191
+ k2)s + (504 + k1). Equating coefficients of this equation with the coefficients of the
desired characteristic equation yields the gains as Kp ¼ [k1 k2 k3] = [ 388.55 147.76
14]. We now develop the transformation matrix to transform back to the z-system.
2 3
0 0 1
CMz ¼ Bz Az Bz A2z Bz ¼ 4 0 1 17 5 and
1 9 81
2 3
h i 0 0 1
CMp ¼ Bp Ap Bp A2p Bp ¼ 4 0 1 24 5
1 24 385
Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises 37
Therefore,
2 32 3 2 3
0 0 1 191 24 1 1 0 0
1
p ¼ CMz CMx ¼ 40 1 17 54 24 1 0 5 ¼ 4 7 1 05
1 9 81 1 0 0 56 15 1
2 3
1 0 0
Hence; Kz ¼ Kp p1 ¼ ½388:55 147:76 144 7 1 05
49 15 1
¼ ½40:23 62:24 14:
8.10 2 3
ð24 þ l1 Þ 1 0
For the given system ex ¼ ðA LCÞex 4 ð191 þ l2 Þ 0 1 5ex . The characteristic
ð504 þ l3 Þ 0 0
polynomial is given by j½sI ðA LCÞj ¼ s3 þð24 þ l 1 Þs2 þð191þl2 Þsþð504 þ l 3 Þ.
Now we find the desired characteristic equation. The dominant poles from Skill-
Assessment Exercise 12.3 come from (s2 + 4s + 19.24). Factoring yields ( 2 +
j3.9) and ( 2 j3.9). Increasing these poles by a factor of 10 and adding a third pole 10
times the real part of the dominant second-order poles yields the desired characteristic
polynomial, (s + 20 + j39)(s + 20 j39)(s + 200) ¼ s3 + 240s2 + 9921s + 384200.
Equating coefficients 2 of the desired
3 characteristic equation to the system's characteristic
216
equation yields L ¼ 4 9730 5.
383696
8.11 2 3 2 3
C 4 6 8
The observability matrix is OM 4 CA 5 ¼ 4 64 80 78 5, where
2 3 CA2 674 848 814
25 28 32
A2 ¼ 4 7 4 11 5. The matrix is of full rank, that is, rank 3, since
77 95 94
|OM| ¼ 1576. Therefore the system is observable.
8.12
The system is represented in cascade form by the following state and output equations:
2 3 2 3
7 1 0 0
6 7 6 7
z_ ¼ 4 0 8 1 5z þ 4 0 5u
0 0 9 1
y ¼ ½1 0 0z
38 Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises
2 3 2 3
Cz 1 0 0
The observability matrix is OMz ¼ 4 Cz Az 5 ¼ 4 7 1 0 5; where A2z ¼
Cz A2z 49 15 1
2 3
49 15 1
4 0 1 1
64 17 5. Since GðsÞ ¼ ¼ 3 ;
ðs þ 7Þðs þ 8Þðs þ 9Þ s þ 24s þ 191s þ 504
2
0 0 81
y ¼ ½1 0 0 x
2 3 2 3
Cx 1 0 0
The observability matrix for this form is OMx ¼ 4 Cx Ax 5 ¼ 4 24 1 0 5;
Cx A2x 385 24 1
2 3
385 24 1
where A2x ¼ 4 4080 191 0 5:
12096 504 0
Now, develop the transformation matrix between the observer canonical and cascade
forms.
2 31 2 3
1 0 0 1 0 0
6 7 6 7
P ¼ O1
Mz OMx ¼ 4 7 0 5 4 24
1 1 05
49 15 1 385 24 1
2 32 3 2 3
1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
¼ 4 7 1 0 54 24 1 0 5 ¼ 4 17 1 0 5:
56 15 1 385 24 1 81 9 1
Finally,
2 32 3 2 3 2 3
1 0 0 456 456 456
4
Lz ¼ PLx ¼ 17 1 0 54 36; 389 5 ¼ 4 28; 637 5 4 28; 640 5:
81 9 1 1; 830; 496 1; 539; 931 1; 540; 000