Anda di halaman 1dari 6

Dyslipidemia and an Unfavorable Fatty Acid Profile Predict

Left Ventricular Hypertrophy 20 Years Later


Johan Sundström, MD; Lars Lind, MD, PhD; Bengt Vessby, MD, PhD; Bertil Andrén, MD, PhD;
Antti Aro, MD, PhD; Hans O. Lithell, MD, PhD

Background—Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a common risk factor for cardiovascular mortality. Causes other than
hypertension have not previously been investigated longitudinally. The aim of the present study was to determine
hemodynamic, metabolic, and psychosocial predictors at 50 years of age for the prevalence of echocardiographic LVH
and geometric subtypes at age 70 by use of a large sample of men from the general population followed up for 20 years.
Methods and Results—In 1970 to 1973, all men born from 1920 to 1924 and residing in Uppsala County, Sweden, were
invited to participate in a health survey aimed at identifying risk factors for cardiovascular disease. At a reinvestigation
20 years later, echocardiographic left ventricular mass index was determined in 475 subjects. A 1-SD increase in body
mass index, systolic or diastolic blood pressure, fasting LDL/HDL cholesterol, serum triglycerides, or the serum
cholesterol ester proportion of several saturated fatty acids or oleic acid at age 50 significantly increased the odds of
having LVH at age 70 by 27% to 41%, whereas an increase in linoleic acid proportion was protective. Almost all
metabolic predictors were independent of ischemic heart disease, valvular disease, and use of antihypertensive
medication at age 70.
Conclusions—Dyslipidemia and indices of a low dietary intake of linoleic acid and high intake of saturated and
monounsaturated fats, as well as hypertension and obesity, at age 50 predicted the prevalence of LVH 20 years later in
this prospective longitudinal cohort study, thereby suggesting that lipids may be important in the origin of LVH.
(Circulation. 2001;103:836-841.)
Key Words: hypertrophy 䡲 lipids 䡲 fatty acids 䡲 insulin 䡲 epidemiology

E chocardiographically determined left ventricular hyper- patients even more than pharmacological antihypertensive
Downloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on March 8, 2019

trophy (LVH) is an important risk factor for cardiovas- treatment.14


cular and all-cause mortality and morbidity,1,2 and an in- Associations have recently been found15–17 between LVH
creased left ventricular relative wall thickness (RWT; wall and the insulin resistance syndrome.18 The left ventricular
thickness divided by ventricular diameter) also has an adverse geometric correlates of insulin resistance are not clear; some
prognosis.1,3 studies16,17,19,20 have found insulin resistance or impaired
The cause of LVH is largely unknown. Cross-sectional glucose tolerance to be more closely related to thick left
studies4 – 6 have shown male sex, age, hypertension, obesity, ventricular walls or increased RWT than to LVH.
certain valvular diseases, and previous myocardial infarction The fatty acid composition of serum cholesterol esters
to be related to LVH or left ventricular mass index (LVMI). (CEs) mainly reflects dietary fat quality over the previous 2
Heredity7 and alcohol use8 might also explain some of the weeks21 and has been shown to predict myocardial infarc-
variance in left ventricular mass. In a prospective study,9 tion,22 but its relationship to LVH is not known. Furthermore,
average blood pressure over 30 years was associated with the relationships between smoking or other psychosocial
LVMI at follow-up. Hypertension is generally regarded as the factors and later LVH are not known.
worst culprit, as indicated by the large number of clinical Thus, there is a need for prospective studies of modifiable
trials on the subject.10 However, the variation in 24-hour predictors of LVH. The aim of the present study was to
blood pressure explains only 25% to 30% of the variation in determine hemodynamic, metabolic, dietary, and psychoso-
left ventricular mass.11 Body size is a powerful determinant of cial predictors at age 50 years for the prevalence of echocar-
left ventricular mass12 and may explain part of the sex diographic LVH and left ventricular geometric subtypes at
difference in left ventricular mass.13 Weight reduction has age 70 years by use of a large, regionally determined sample
been shown to decrease LVMI in overweight hypertensive of men from the general population followed up for 20 years.

Received July 20, 2000; revision received October 6, 2000; accepted October 10, 2000.
From the Departments of Public Health and Caring Sciences (J.S., B.V., H.O.L.) and Medical Sciences (L.L., B.A.), Uppsala University, Sweden, and
Department of Nutrition (A.A.), KTL (National Public Health Institute), Helsinki, Finland.
Correspondence to Johan Sundström, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences/Geriatrics, PO Box 609, SE-75125 Uppsala, Sweden
(Kålsängsgränd 10D, SE-75319 Uppsala, Sweden). E-mail johan.sundstrom@geriatrik.uu.se
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Circulation is available at http://www.circulationaha.org

836
Sundström et al Dyslipidemia and Saturated Fats Predict LVH 837

Methods terms were tested in all regressions. ANOVA was used to calculate
In 1970 to 1973, all men born from 1920 to 1924 and residing in differences in means between left ventricular geometric subgroups
Uppsala County were invited to participate in a health survey23 and factorial ANOVA to adjust for possible confounders. Post hoc
aimed at identifying risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Of the Bonferroni-adjusted comparisons were only performed if overall
invited subjects, 2322 (82%) participated. At a reinvestigation of the ANOVA was significant. A ␹2 test was used to evaluate differences
cohort 20 years later, an echocardiographic examination was made in in nominal variables between geometric subgroups. Two-tailed
the first 583 consecutive subjects of 1221 available. The population significance values were given with P⬍0.05 regarded as significant.
of the present study consisted of 475 men in whom determination of Stata 6.0 software was used (Stata Corporation).
left ventricular geometry was possible.24 All subjects gave informed
consent, and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Results
Uppsala University. Procedures followed were in accordance with
department guidelines. Prediction of LVH
The prevalence of LVH at age 70 was 28% in the present
Investigations at Age 50 cohort. Among the variables associated with the insulin
These investigations have been described previously.23 Blood pres- resistance syndrome, a 1-SD increase in body mass index,
sure in the recumbent position was measured with a mercury systolic or diastolic blood pressure, fasting LDL/HDL cho-
manometer, and radial pulse rate was counted. All blood samples lesterol, or serum triglycerides at age 50 resulted in 27% to
were drawn in the morning after an overnight fast. Blood glucose,
serum insulin, cholesterol, triglycerides, and HDL cholesterol were
41% increased odds of having LVH at age 70 (Table 1). A
measured, and LDL cholesterol was calculated with Friedewald’s 1-SD increase in the CE proportion of any of myristic (14:0),
formula. The CE proportions of fatty acids (14:0 to 22:6 ␻3) were palmitic (16:0), stearic (18:0), oleic (18:1), or eicosapenta-
determined by gas chromatography.22 No dietary records were enoic acid (20:5 ␻3) at age 50 increased the odds of having
obtained, but in other population studies in middle-aged men in the LVH at age 70 by 29% to 37%, whereas a 1-SD increase in
1970s in Sweden, intake of fat corresponded to ⬇40%, of carbohy-
drates to 45% to 50%, and of protein to 13% to 15% of energy intake. the proportion of linoleic acid (18:2 ␻6) at age 50 reduced the
The estimated intake of saturated fats corresponded to 17% to 18% odds of having LVH at age 70 by 24% (Table 1). Levels of
of energy intake. At age 70, 7-day dietary records in 444 of the 475 physical activity, education, smoking, civil status, and socio-
subjects showed an intake of fat corresponding to 35%, of carbohy- economic status at age 50, crude or adjusted, were not
drates to 48%, and of protein to 16% of energy intake, which was
associated with later LVH (data not shown). With simulta-
comparable to other contemporary Swedish populations of the same
age. neous control for ischemic heart disease during follow-up,
A questionnaire covered level of physical activity (4 categories) valvular disease, and use of antihypertensive medication at
and education (5 categories). Coding of smoking (smoker, non- age 70, the adjusted odds ratios were similar to the crude odds
smoker, ex-smoker), civil status, and socioeconomic status (3 social ratios, but systolic and diastolic blood pressure and palmitic
classes, Central Bureau of Statistics) was based on interview
reports.23
acid were no longer significantly associated with LVH (Table
Downloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on March 8, 2019

1). With control also for body mass index at age 50,
Investigations at Age 70 LDL/HDL cholesterol and proportions of stearic, oleic, lino-
At age 70, 167 subjects were regularly using antihypertensive leic, and eicosapentaenoic acids remained significant predic-
medication, and 38 used lipid-lowering drugs, of whom 16 used tors of LVH.
statins, 15 fibrates, 6 resins, and 2 nicotinic acid, as monotherapy or
in combination. Fifty-four subjects had been hospitalized owing to Prediction of Increased Left Ventricular RWT
ischemic heart disease (ICD-9 codes 410 to 414) between the
investigations at 50 and 70 years of age. Seventeen subjects had The prevalence of increased RWT at age 70 was 25% in the
significant echocardiographic valvular disease (aortic or mitral present cohort. A 1-SD increase in CE proportion of oleic
stenosis or regurgitation grades 3 or 4). acid (18:1), ␥-linolenic acid (18:3 ␻6), or dihomo-␥-linolenic
A comprehensive 2D and Doppler echocardiography examination acid (20:3 ␻6) at age 50 increased the odds of having
was performed as described previously.24 Left ventricular mass was increased RWT at age 70 by 28% to 32%, whereas a 1-SD
divided by body surface area to obtain LVMI. LVH was defined as
an LVMI ⱖ150 g/m2 according to data from the Framingham Heart increase in the proportion of linoleic acid (18:2 ␻6) at age 50
Study,25 and a partition value of 0.4426 was used for RWT [(inter- reduced the odds of having increased RWT at age 70 by 26%
ventricular septum⫹posterior wall thickness)/left ventricular end- (Table 2). The studied psychosocial issues were not associ-
diastolic diameter]. Thus, left ventricular geometry was considered ated with increased RWT (data not shown). Controlling for
normal if RWT was ⬍0.44 and LVMI was ⬍150 g/m2. A normal
LVMI with increased RWT was denoted concentric remodeling,26
ischemic heart disease during follow-up, valvular disease,
and a hypertrophic left ventricle was denoted eccentric if the RWT and use of antihypertensive medication at age 70 gave results
was normal and concentric if the RWT was increased. similar to the unadjusted analysis (Table 2). When body mass
index at age 50 was also controlled for, proportions of oleic
Statistical Analysis and linoleic acid remained significantly associated with
Variables with a skewed distribution (fasting serum insulin, triglyc- increased RWT.
erides, LDL/HDL cholesterol, and CE proportion of palmitoleic,
stearic, ␥-linolenic, ␣-linolenic, eicosapentaenoic, and docosahexae-
We reperformed all the above analyses in a subsample of
noic acids) were logarithmically transformed to achieve normal 421 subjects without ischemic heart disease during follow-up.
distribution, and these transformed variables were used in all In logistic regression analysis with LVH at age 70 as the
analyses. Logistic regression was used with LVH or increased RWT dependent variable, adjusted for valvular disease and use of
at age 70 as outcome variables and standardized continuous variables antihypertensive medication at age 70, significant predictors
(mean⫽0, SD⫽1) or indicator variables for multilevel nominal
variables at age 50 as explanatory variables. Multiple logistic were the same as when adjusted for ischemic heart disease
regression was used to adjust for possible confounders, which were during follow-up in the total sample, with the addition of total
treated as dichotomous variables. Squared terms and interaction cholesterol and the exception of myristic acid (14:0). When
838 Circulation February 13, 2001

TABLE 1. ORs for Having LVH at Age 70 for a 1-SD Increase in a Variable at Age 50
Crude OR Adjusted OR
n Characteristics at Age 50 (95% CI) (95% CI)*
Body mass index 475 24.8⫾2.9 kg/m2 1.39 (1.14–1.70)§ 1.29 (1.04–1.59)†
Systolic blood pressure 475 131⫾17 mm Hg 1.27 (1.05–1.55)† 1.07 (0.86–1.33)
Diastolic blood pressure 475 83⫾11 mm Hg 1.41 (1.16–1.72)§ 1.18 (0.95–1.48)
Pulse rate 475 68⫾11 bpm 0.97 (0.79–1.19) 0.90 (0.73–1.11)
fS-cholesterol 475 6.7⫾1.2 mmol/L 1.21 (0.99–1.48) 1.16 (0.95–1.43)
f-LDL/HDL cholesterol ratio 371 3.8⫾1.7 1.34 (1.06–1.69)† 1.31 (1.02–1.67)†
fS-triglycerides 475 1.7⫾0.8 mmol/L 1.36 (1.11–1.66)‡ 1.27 (1.03–1.57)†
fB-glucose 472 4.9⫾0.6 mmol/L 1.09 (0.89–1.33) 1.08 (0.88–1.32)
fS-insulin 323 11.4⫾6.9 ␮U/mL 1.23 (0.97–1.57) 1.20 (0.94–1.54)
CE–myristic acid 14:0 431 1.2⫾0.3% 1.29 (1.04–1.59)† 1.26 (1.02–1.56)†
CE–palmitic acid 16:0 431 11.7⫾0.9% 1.29 (1.04–1.61)† 1.24 (0.99–1.55)
CE–palmitoleic acid 16:1 431 3.5⫾1.1% 1.02 (0.82–1.26) 0.97 (0.78–1.21)
CE–stearic acid 18:0 431 1.2⫾0.3% 1.30 (1.05–1.60)† 1.33 (1.06–1.66)†
CE–oleic acid 18:1 431 19.1⫾2.4% 1.29 (1.05–1.60)† 1.27 (1.03–1.58)†
CE–linoleic acid 18:2 ␻6 431 54.6⫾4.6% 0.76 (0.61–0.93)‡ 0.77 (0.63–0.96)†
CE–␥-linolenic acid 18:3 ␻6 431 0.6⫾0.3% 1.02 (0.83–1.27) 1.01 (0.82–1.26)
CE–␣-linolenic acid 18:3 ␻3 431 0.6⫾0.2% 1.13 (0.91–1.40) 1.13 (0.91–1.41)
CE–dihomo-␥-linolenic acid 20:3 ␻6 431 0.6⫾0.1% 1.02 (0.83–1.26) 0.95 (0.76–1.18)
CE–arachidonic acid 20:4 ␻6 431 4.7⫾0.9% 1.13 (0.91–1.39) 1.15 (0.92–1.43)
CE–eicosapentaenoic acid 20:5 ␻3 431 1.2⫾0.6% 1.37 (1.10–1.70)‡ 1.38 (1.10–1.73)‡
CE–docosahexaenoic acid 22:6 ␻3 431 0.7⫾0.2% 1.23 (0.99–1.52) 1.24 (1.00–1.55)
Data are means or geometric means ⫾ SDs and odds ratios (95% CI). n indicates number of subjects; f, fasting; S, serum; and
B, blood.
*Adjusted for ischemic heart disease, valvular disease, and use of antihypertensive medication at age 70.
†P⬍0.05; ‡P⬍0.01; §P⬍0.001 for equal odds.
Downloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on March 8, 2019

increased RWT was used as dependent variable, only concentric LVH group, diastolic blood pressure and CE
dihomo-␥-linolenic acid (20:3 ␻6) was significant in the proportions of myristic (14:0), palmitic (16:0), oleic (18:1),
ischemic heart disease–free subsample. and eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5 ␻3) were significantly higher
In the total sample, when also adjusting for use of lipid- and linoleic acid (18:2 ␻6) was significantly lower than in the
lowering drugs at age 70 (adjusting for antihypertensive normal geometry group. In the eccentric LVH group, body
drugs, lipid-lowering drugs, and valvular disease at age 70 mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fasting
and ischemic heart disease during follow-up), the effect of serum triglycerides, and CE proportions of oleic (18:1) and
triglycerides (P⫽0.055) and LDL/HDL cholesterol eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5 ␻3) were significantly higher,
(P⫽0.063) on later LVH became of borderline significance, and linoleic acid (18:2 ␻6) was significantly lower than in the
but body mass index and CE proportions of fatty acids 14:0, normal geometry group. The studied psychosocial factors did
18:0, 18:1, 18:2 ␻6, and 20:5 ␻3 remained significant, and not vary between the left ventricular geometry groups (data
the CE proportion of docosahexaenoic acid (22:6 ␻3) became not shown). With simultaneous control for ischemic heart
significantly directly related to later LVH. Regarding predic- disease during follow-up and for valvular disease and use of
tion of later increased RWT, the same adjustment made oleic antihypertensive medication at age 70, differences between
acid lose significance, but other predictors remained groups regarding proportions of oleic, linoleic, ␥-linolenic,
significant. and eicosapentaenoic acids were still significant, whereas
other differences lost significance. When body mass index at
Characteristics at Age 50 According to Left 50 was also controlled for, differences in oleic, linoleic, and
Ventricular Geometric Patterns at Age 70 eicosapentaenoic acids remained significant.
The levels of several variables associated with the insulin
resistance syndrome and CE proportions of several fatty acids Discussion
determined at age 50 varied significantly between the 4 left In this 20-year follow-up of a large, regionally determined
ventricular geometry groups determined at age 70 (Table 3). sample of men from the general population, dyslipidemia and
In the concentric remodeling group, CE proportions of oleic a CE fatty acid composition indicating a high dietary intake
(18:1) and ␥-linolenic acid (18:3 ␻6) were significantly of saturated and monounsaturated fats and low intake of
higher and the proportion of linoleic acid (18:2 ␻6) was linoleic acid at age 50 predicted the prevalence of LVH at age
significantly lower than in the normal geometry group. In the 70 to a similar degree as hypertension and obesity. The
Sundström et al Dyslipidemia and Saturated Fats Predict LVH 839

TABLE 2. ORs for Having Increased Left Ventricular RWT at reason for these differences is not clear, but the metabolic
Age 70 for a 1-SD Increase in a Variable at Age 50 associations may be affected by the normally observed
Crude OR Adjusted OR* age-related increase in RWT.27
n (95% CI) (95% CI) The relationship between an unfavorable CE fatty acid
Body mass index 475 1.09 (0.88–1.33) 1.10 (0.89–1.36) composition and later LVH is important, because the fatty
acid composition reflects dietary fat quality over the past
Systolic blood pressure 475 1.14 (0.93–1.39) 1.12 (0.90–1.41)
couple of weeks21 and thus is a modifiable risk factor.
Diastolic blood pressure 475 1.18 (0.96–1.44) 1.18 (0.93–1.49)
Previous studies of the present cohort have shown that a fatty
Pulse rate 475 1.12 (0.92–1.37) 1.11 (0.90–1.37)
acid profile indicating a high dietary intake of saturated fats
fS-cholesterol 475 1.17 (0.95–1.44) 1.18 (0.96–1.45) and low intake of linoleic acid is related to insulin resistance28
f-LDL/HDL cholesterol ratio 371 1.18 (0.93–1.50) 1.20 (0.94–1.55) and predicts myocardial infarction over 19 years.22 Because
fS-triglycerides 475 1.04 (0.85–1.28) 1.06 (0.86–1.32) the impact of other traditional risk factors on myocardial
fB-glucose 472 0.88 (0.71–1.10) 0.88 (0.71–1.10) infarction22 was similar to their impact on LVH in the present
fS-insulin 323 1.00 (0.77–1.29) 1.02 (0.78–1.32) study, LVH might be regarded as an intermediary risk factor
CE–myristic acid 14:0 431 1.07 (0.87–1.33) 1.08 (0.87–1.34) on the pathway between the described risk factor profile and
CE–palmitic acid 16:0 431 1.24 (0.99–1.55) 1.26 (1.00–1.58)
myocardial infarction. The apparently reciprocal effects of
linoleic acid (which makes up ⬎50% of all CE fatty acids)
CE–palmitoleic acid 16:1 431 1.24 (1.00–1.53) 1.24 (1.00–1.54)
and the saturated fatty acids may be due to passive redistri-
CE–stearic acid 18:0 431 1.04 (0.84–1.30) 1.06 (0.85–1.32)
bution of the less abundant acids after changes in linoleic acid
CE–oleic acid 18:1 431 1.32 (1.06–1.64)† 1.33 (1.07–1.66)† proportion occur but may also reflect true pathophysiological
CE–linoleic acid 18:2 ␻6 431 0.74 (0.60–0.92)‡ 0.73 (0.58–0.91)‡ effects of the saturated fatty acids. In these men, the dietary
CE–␥-linolenic acid 18:3 431 1.28 (1.02–1.60)† 1.29 (1.03–1.62)† source of oleic acid was not olive oil (which was not used by
␻6 middle-aged men in Sweden in the early 1970s) but food
CE–␣-linolenic acid 18:3 431 1.12 (0.90–1.39) 1.12 (0.90–1.40) groups containing a high proportion of saturated fatty acids,
␻3 such as dairy products, solid margarines, and meat products.
CE–dihomo-␥-linolenic acid 431 1.28 (1.03–1.58)† 1.28 (1.03–1.59)† The low impact of ␻3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, which are
20:3 ␻6 generally regarded as favorable, and the initially surprising
CE–arachidonic acid 20:4 431 1.03 (0.83–1.28) 1.04 (0.84–1.30) relationship between eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5 ␻3) levels
␻6
and later LVH may be because a high intake of linoleic
CE–eicosapentaenoic acid 431 1.15 (0.92–1.43) 1.16 (0.93–1.45) acid–rich vegetable fats reduces ␻3-acid levels in serum21 by
Downloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on March 8, 2019

20:5 ␻3
a decreased conversion of ␣-linolenic acid (18:3 ␻3) to
CE–docosahexaenoic acid 431 0.99 (0.79–1.22) 1.00 (0.80–1.24) eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5 ␻3) through competition for the
22:6 ␻3
same enzyme systems. Other factors than dietary fat intake
Abbreviations as in Table 1. may affect CE fatty acid profile, but the relationships between
*Adjusted for ischemic heart disease, valvular disease, and use of antihy-
LDL/HDL cholesterol and triglycerides and later LVH sup-
pertensive medication at age 70.
†P⬍0.05; ‡P⬍0.01 for equal odds. port the adverse role of a diet rich in saturated fats.
No psychosocial variables were associated with develop-
impact of obesity, dyslipidemia, and an unfavorable fatty acid ment of LVH in the present study, in accordance with a
profile on LVH was independent of history of ischemic heart cross-sectional population study15 in which exercise physical
disease, valvular disease, and use of antihypertensive medi- activity and smoking were not related to LVH. The present
cation at age 70. The relationships between dyslipidemia and cohort has been closely monitored for 20 years and may
an unfavorable fatty acid profile and later LVH were also therefore be healthier than average Swedish 70-year-old men.
independent of obesity at age 50. Previously, hypertension Thus, associations in the present study may be weaker than in
has been related to the development of LVH in a prospective the general population.
study,9 but the predictive value of obesity, dyslipidemia, and One limitation of the study is the lack of dietary records at
indices of an unfavorable diet for LVH has never been shown. baseline and the resulting lack of knowledge about any
Focus has recently turned to the association between LVH potential dietary certainties in the studied population, which
and the insulin resistance syndrome.15–17,19,20 Some cross- might influence the generalizability of the findings of the
sectional population studies on the subject exist,15,19,20 but present study. Other limitations of the study include absence
most studies have been made in small groups of hypertensive of echocardiographic data at baseline, possible underestima-
patients, which would not be ideal for the search for corre- tion of the impact of variables with substantial measurement
lates to LVH other than hypertension. In the present study, error or missing data, and bias due to loss to follow-up. Of
lipid derangements, unfavorable fatty acid profile, and obe- course, confounding factors other than the ones for which we
sity seemed to be powerful longitudinal predictors of LVH adjusted may also exist. Because many analyses were per-
development, in contrast to a cross-sectional analysis of the formed, some chance associations may have been found. This
same cohort at age 70 in which several measures of glucose study has a limited generalizability to women and other age
intolerance and insulin resistance were related to an increased and ethnic groups, and further studies are needed for confir-
RWT and concentric remodeling but less to LVH.20 The mation of these findings.
840 Circulation February 13, 2001

TABLE 3. Characteristics at Age 50 According to Left Ventricular Geometric Patterns at Age 70


Concentric Concentric Eccentric Crude Adjusted
Normal Remodeling LVH LVH ANOVA P ANOVA P *
Number of subjects 262 79 40 94
2
Body mass index, kg/m 24.5⫾2.8 24.8⫾3.0 25.3⫾2.8 25.6⫾3.2‡ 0.008 0.08
Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg 129⫾17 132⫾15 135⫾17 135⫾17† 0.046 0.46
Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg 81⫾10 83⫾10 86⫾12‡ 85⫾11‡ 0.003 0.25
Pulse rate, bpm 68⫾11 69⫾9 69⫾12 68⫾10 0.72 0.56
fS-cholesterol, mmol/L 6.6⫾1.2 6.7⫾1.1 7.0⫾1.1 6.8⫾1.3 0.12 0.17
f-LDL/HDL cholesterol ratio 3.6⫾1.8 3.8⫾1.9 4.2⫾1.2 4.0⫾1.5 0.06 0.09
fS-triglycerides, mmol/L 1.6⫾0.7 1.6⫾0.7 1.8⫾0.6 1.8⫾1.1‡ 0.03 0.16
fB-glucose, mmol/L 4.9⫾0.6 4.9⫾0.6 4.8⫾0.4 5.0⫾0.6 0.27 0.27
fS-insulin, ␮U/mL 11.0⫾6.7 11.6⫾6.5 11.0⫾5.1 12.8⫾8.1 0.15 0.24
CE–myristic acid 14:0, % 1.1⫾0.2 1.1⫾0.2 1.2⫾0.3† 1.2⫾0.3 0.04 0.06
CE–palmitic acid 16:0, % 11.6⫾0.8 11.7⫾0.9 11.9⫾0.9† 11.8⫾1.0 0.04 0.07
CE–palmitoleic acid 16:1, % 3.4⫾1.0 3.7⫾1.2 3.6⫾1.1 3.4⫾0.9 0.27 0.26
CE–stearic acid 18:0, % 1.1⫾0.2 1.2⫾0.3 1.2⫾0.3 1.2⫾0.3 0.08 0.07
CE–oleic acid 18:1, % 18.8⫾2.3 19.4⫾2.2† 19.9⫾2.7‡ 19.4⫾2.5† 0.009 0.01
CE–linoleic acid 18:2 ␻6, % 55.3⫾4.3 53.8⫾4.6† 53.2⫾5.0‡ 53.9⫾4.8† 0.003 0.005
CE–␥-linolenic acid 18:3 ␻6, % 0.6⫾0.3 0.7⫾0.4‡ 0.6⫾0.2 0.6⫾0.3 0.04 0.03
CE–␣-linolenic acid 18:3 ␻3, % 0.6⫾0.2 0.6⫾0.2 0.7⫾0.2 0.6⫾0.2 0.40 0.39
CE–dihomo-␥-linolenic acid 20:3 ␻6, % 0.5⫾0.1 0.6⫾0.2 0.6⫾0.1 0.6⫾0.1 0.08 0.08
CE–arachidonic acid 20:4 ␻6, % 4.7⫾0.9 4.8⫾1.0 4.7⫾0.8 4.9⫾1.0 0.36 0.38
CE–eicosapentaenoic acid 20:5 ␻3, % 1.2⫾0.5 1.2⫾0.7 1.4⫾0.5† 1.3⫾0.5† 0.03 0.03
CE–docosahexaenoic acid 22:6 ␻3, % 0.7⫾0.2 0.7⫾0.2 0.7⫾0.2 0.7⫾0.2 0.11 0.12
Data are means or geometric means ⫾ SDs. Abbreviations as in Table 1.
*Adjusted for ischemic heart disease, valvular disease, and use of antihypertensive medication at age 70.
Downloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on March 8, 2019

†P⬍0.05; ‡P⬍0.01 for no difference from group with normal left ventricular geometry, crude analysis.

In conclusion, dyslipidemia and indices of a low dietary 4. Levy D, Anderson KM, Savage DD, et al. Echocardiographically detected
left ventricular hypertrophy: prevalence and risk factors: the Framingham
intake of linoleic acid and high intake of saturated and
Heart Study. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:7–13.
monounsaturated fats, as well as obesity and hypertension, at 5. Hammond IW, Devereux RB, Alderman MH, et al. Relation of blood
age 50 predicted the prevalence of LVH at age 70 in this pressure and body build to left ventricular mass in normotensive and
20-year follow-up of a large, regionally determined sample of hypertensive employed adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12:996 –1004.
6. Sundstrom J, Lind L, Andren B, et al. Left ventricular geometry and
men derived from the general population. The impact of function are related to electrocardiographic characteristics and diagnoses.
obesity, dyslipidemia, and evidence of high dietary intake of Clin Physiol. 1998;18:463– 470.
saturated fats on LVH was independent of history of ischemic 7. Post WS, Larson MG, Myers RH, et al. Heritability of left ventricular
mass: the Framingham Heart Study. Hypertension. 1997;30:1025–1028.
heart disease, valvular disease, and use of antihypertensive 8. Manolio TA, Levy D, Garrison RJ, et al. Relation of alcohol intake to left
medication, indicating that lipids may be important in the ventricular mass: the Framingham Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17:
origin of LVH. 717–721.
9. Lauer MS, Anderson KM, Levy D. Influence of contemporary versus
30-year blood pressure levels on left ventricular mass and geometry: the
Acknowledgments Framingham Heart Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18:1287–1294.
This study was supported by the Swedish Medical Research Council 10. Dahlof B, Pennert K, Hansson L. Reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy
No. 5446, Trygg Hansa, Thuréus Foundation, Foundation for Geri- in hypertensive patients: a meta-analysis of 109 treatment studies. Am J
atric Research (Stiftelsen för Geriatrisk Forskning), Geriatric Fund Hypertens. 1992;5:95–110.
(Geriatriska Fonden), and Uppsala University. 11. Majahalme S, Turjanmaa V, Weder A, et al. Blood pressure levels and
variability, smoking, and left ventricular structure in normotension and in
borderline and mild hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1996;9:1110 –1118.
References 12. Lauer MS, Anderson KM, Kannel WB, et al. The impact of obesity on left
1. Koren MJ, Devereux RB, Casale PN, et al. Relation of left ventricular ventricular mass and geometry: the Framingham Heart Study. JAMA.
mass and geometry to morbidity and mortality in uncomplicated essential 1991;266:231–236.
hypertension. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:345–352. 13. de Simone G, Devereux RB, Daniels SR, et al. Gender differences in left
2. Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, et al. Prognostic implications of ventricular growth. Hypertension. 1995;26:979 –983.
echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Fra- 14. MacMahon SW, Wilcken DE, Macdonald GJ. The effect of weight
mingham Heart Study. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:1561–1566. reduction on left ventricular mass: a randomized controlled trial in young,
3. Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Borgioni C, et al. Adverse prognostic signif- overweight hypertensive patients. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:334 –339.
icance of concentric remodeling of the left ventricle in hypertensive 15. Marcus R, Krause L, Weder AB, et al. Sex-specific determinants of
patients with normal left ventricular mass. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25: increased left ventricular mass in the Tecumseh Blood Pressure Study.
871– 878. Circulation. 1994;90:928 –936.
Sundström et al Dyslipidemia and Saturated Fats Predict LVH 841

16. Lind L, Andersson PE, Andren B, et al. Left ventricular hypertrophy in tocopherol predicts the development of myocardial infarction in
hypertension is associated with the insulin resistance metabolic 50-year-old men: 19 years follow-up. Atherosclerosis. 1996;127:65–71.
syndrome. J Hypertens. 1995;13:433– 438. 23. Hedstrand H. A study of middle-aged men with particular reference to
17. Paolisso G, Galderisi M, Tagliamonte MR, et al. Myocardial wall risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Ups J Med Sci Suppl. 1975;
thickness and left ventricular geometry in hypertensives: relationship with 19:1– 61.
insulin. Am J Hypertens. 1997;10:1250 –1256. 24. Andren B, Lind L, Hedenstierna G, et al. Left ventricular hypertrophy and
18. Reaven GM. Banting lecture 1988: role of insulin resistance in human geometry in a population sample of elderly males. Eur Heart J. 1996;17:
disease. Diabetes. 1988;37:1595–1607. 1800 –1807.
25. Levy D, Savage DD, Garrison RJ, et al. Echocardiographic criteria for left
19. Ohya Y, Abe I, Fujii K, et al. Hyperinsulinemia and left ventricular
ventricular hypertrophy: the Framingham Heart Study. Am J Cardiol.
geometry in a work-site population in Japan. Hypertension. 1996;27:
1987;59:956 –960.
729 –734.
26. Ganau A, Devereux RB, Roman MJ, et al. Patterns of left ventricular
20. Sundstrom J, Lind L, Nystrom N, et al. Left ventricular concentric hypertrophy and geometric remodeling in essential hypertension. J Am
remodeling rather than left ventricular hypertrophy is related to the Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:1550 –1558.
insulin resistance syndrome in elderly men. Circulation. 2000;101: 27. Ganau A, Saba PS, Roman MJ, et al. Ageing induces left ventricular
2595–2600. concentric remodelling in normotensive subjects. J Hypertens. 1995;13:
21. Nikkari T. Serum fatty acids and coronary heart disease in Finnish 1818 –1822.
populations. Prog Lipid Res. 1986;25:437– 450. 28. Vessby B, Tengblad S, Lithell H. Insulin sensitivity is related to the fatty
22. Ohrvall M, Berglund L, Salminen I, et al. The serum cholesterol ester acid composition of serum lipids and skeletal muscle phospholipids in
fatty acid composition but not the serum concentration of alpha 70-year-old men. Diabetologia. 1994;37:1044 –1050.
Downloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on March 8, 2019

Anda mungkin juga menyukai