Abstract
This research was aimed to investigate the use of digital comic in helping senior high
school students to write narrative text and to find out the students’ perception on the use
of digital comic in teaching writing of narrative text. This research employed a
quantitative method with a true experimental design. The sample of this research was the
10th-grade students at one senior high school in Garut. There were 71 students involved
in this research; 36 of them belonged to experimental group and the rest were belonged
to control group. Therefore, writing test and questionnaire were implemented as the
research instrument in order to collect the data. Writing test of this research was
implemented twice; first as a pretest and second as a posttest. In addition, Sangkuriang
and Timun Mas were chosen as the title of digital comic used in this research. The result
of this research indicated that the use of digital comic as teaching media can improve
students’ ability in writing narrative text. The result also revealed that the use of digital
comic in teaching writing of narrative text has more advantages rather than the
disadvantages. From this research, teachers are recommended to use digital comic in
teaching writing of narrative text.
103
Susilawati,
Teaching writing of narrative text through digital comic
complex than the other skills (reading, Moreover, Comic Life Creator (2016, p.2)
listening and speaking). Writing narrative says that digital comic is beneficial to learn in
text is also not easy for the student. Hence, the classroom and not just a fun art-
the English teachers need to find an enrichment activity. The creator explains that
alternative way to help the students comics can make the students experience
improving their study skill (Kharisma, 2009, success in their writing. Students transfer
p.1). specific elements directly into text-only
One way to help student’s problem in writing. For example, students learn that
writing narrative text is by using digital whatever text found in a word balloon is put
comic (Yunus et al., 2015, pp.54-55). Yunus inside quotes in their text-only writing. By
and Friends (2015, p.54) say that digital using digital comic, students have a new
comic can spur students’ interest to write. By publishing medium, and also the documents of
using digital comic, students can work digital comic can be printed, emailed or
collaboratively as digital comic can be a great posted on a website very easily.
collaboration tool (Yunus et al., 2015, pp.54- Thus, this research is focused on
55). This subsequently can improve students’ investigating the effectiveness of using digital
language skills. comic in teaching writing of narrative text for
Digital comic can easily transgress on the senior high school students. Moreover,
the definition of comic by McCloud (1993) this research also tries to find out the
“juxtaposed pictorial and other images in advantages and the disadvantages of using
deliberate sequence” as they may contain digital comic in teaching writing of narrative
moving images, be accompanied by audio text from students’ perception.
tracks, or even are narratives in true
multimedia (Dittmar, 2012, p.83). Digital
comic is a type of comic which is used with a METHOD
computer application and has colored This research was implemented in one Senior
pictures, balloon text with dialogue and also High School in Garut. Two classes of tenth
music effect (Kustianingsari & Dewi, 2015, grade involved in this research; X MIA 1 and
p.3). Moreover, Purnama, Mulyoto, and X MIA 2. The experimental group was X
Ardiyanto (2015, pp. 20-21) describe a digital MIA 1 and the control group was X MIA 2.
comic as a story with some arranged pictures The participant of experimental group
which is done or published by computer. consisted of 36 students, in which 11 students
Digital comic is a digital media that can of them were male and 25 students were
be used in the classroom to help the students’ female, and the participant of control group
understanding by using pictures in the story consisted of 35 students, in which 12 students
(Kustianingsari & Dewi, 2015, p.1). Digital of them were male and 23 students were
media has some characteristics (Smaldino et female.
al., as cited in Purnama, Mulyoto & Ardianto, This research employed a quantitative
2015, p.20); first, it is easy to use, because of research by using a true experimental design.
its digital projector. Second, it is portable, it There are some reasons why the design was
can be carried anywhere. Third, the ability to selected by the researcher. First, a true
save of this media, digital visual can be stored experimental design is commonly used in
on a CD or DVD. The last, the endurance of educational research in order to establish
the media, the digital media can be saved in a cause and effect relationship among the
long time. groups of variable. Second, a true
In teaching writing, a digital comic also experimental design was chosen by the
gives an important role. Nisa and Al-Hafidz researcher to find out the effectiveness of
(2014, p.72) say that comics can motivate the using digital comic in teaching writing of
students in learning English, capture and narrative text. The last, the researcher
maintain the learner’s interest (Yang, as cited randomly assigned the participants to this
in Nisa & Al-Hafidz, 2014). In addition, research.
digital comics are easy to use and their This design took two groups as
applications may help low achiever learners in investigated group, namely experimental
writing as it can motivate the learners to group and control or comparison group. Both
write in English (Yunus et al., 2012, p.57). of them got different treatment. The
104
Susilawati,
Teaching writing of narrative text through digital comic
105
Susilawati,
Teaching writing of narrative text through digital comic
v.24. The alpha level of significance was 0.05. were conducted before the independent t-test,
The result of the test computation showed and then the independent t-test was
that the Sig. (probability) was 0.257 for the conducted in the last.
experimental group and 0.337 for the control The normality distribution test of
group. These probabilities were bigger than posttest scores was also computed by using
the alpha level of significance (0.05). It means Shapiro-Wilk test formula in IBM SPSS
that the null hypothesis was accepted and the Statistics v.24. The alpha level of significance
scores were normally distributed. was 0.05. From the result of the test
In order to find out the variance score of computation, it can be seen that the Sig.
experimental and control group are (probability) of experimental group was 0.478
homogenous or not, the homogeneity and the Sig. (probability) of control group was
variance test was needed to be performed. 0.623. The probabilities of experimental and
The statistical calculation of variance control group were bigger than the alpha
homogeneity test of this research used Levene level of significance (0.05). In conclusion, the
Statistic Test formula in IBM SPSS Statistics null hypothesis was accepted and the scores
v.24. The result of the homogeneity variance were normally distributed.
test computation revealed that the Sig. Furthermore, the Levene Statistic Test
(probability) was 0.622. It was bigger than the formula of IBM SPSS Statistics v.24 was still
alpha level of significance (0.05). It can be used to find out the homogeneity variance
concluded that the null hypothesis is accepted, score of experimental and control group’
and the variance of the experimental group posttest. The result of the homogeneity
and the control group pretest are variance test computation revealed that the
homogenous. Sig. (probability) was 0.586. It was more than
Moreover, the independent t-test in IBM the alpha level of significance (0.05). It means
SPSS Statistics v.24 was used to investigate that the alternative hypothesis is rejected, so
the difference between the means of the variance of the experimental group and
experimental group pretest and control group the control group’ posttest are homogenous.
pretest. The test was conducted after the data Additionally, the independent t-test in
had been proven to be normally distributed IBM SPSS Statistics v.24 was also used to
and homogenous in their variance. The result investigate the difference between the means
of the t-test computation for both of experimental group and control group. The
experimental and control group informed that test was conducted after the data had been
the pretest score for both groups did not proven to be normally distributed and
differ significantly. The value of t (69) was homogenous in their variance. The result of
1.015 with tcrit (69) is 2.000 (Coolidge, 200, the t-test computation displayed that both
p.276). The obtained value of t was proven to experimental and control group differ
be less than tcrit (1.015 < 2.000). It means that significantly in their scores, where tobt (69) is
the H0 was not rejected. It can be concluded 3.058 and tcrit (69) is 2.000 (Coolidge, 2000,
that there is no significant difference between p.276). It means that the obtained value of t
the two means of the groups. was proven to be more than tcrit (3.058 >
2.000), then the H0 was rejected. It can be
Posttest Scores of Experimental and concluded that there is a significant difference
Control Group between the two means of the groups.
Both experimental and control group received
a posttest in order to find out the students’ Pretest and Posttest Scores of Control
improvement after given a treatment. The Group
result of the student’s posttest score reported The computation of pretest and posttest was
that the mean of experimental group was aimed to find out that there is a significant
69.22. On the other hand, the mean of control difference between pretest and posttest scores
group was 65.29. of the Control group or not. Before the
It can be seen that both experimental and researcher compared the pretest and posttest
control group means are clearly different, but scores of the control group, the researcher did
they still need to be validated by statistical the normality distribution test and the
computation. Therefore, the normality homogeneity variance test by using IBM
distribution and variance homogeneity test SPSS Statistic v.24.
106
Susilawati,
Teaching writing of narrative text through digital comic
The result of the normality distribution Sig. (probability) of pretest score was 0.257
test suggested that the scores were normally and the Sig. (probability) of posttest score was
distributed, where the Sig. (probability) of 0.478. In addition, the result of the
pretest score was 0.337 and the Sig. homogeneity variance test computation
(probability) of posttest score was 0.623. It showed that the Sig. (probability) was 0.602.
means that the probabilities of both pretest These probabilities were more than the alpha
and posttest score were more than the alpha level of significant (0.05).
level of significance (0.05), so the alternative Furthermore, the mean of pretest score
hypothesis was rejected and the scores were was 60.14 and the mean of posttest was 69.22.
normally distributed. It can be seen that both pretest and posttest
The next was the homogeneity variance of experimental group scores were
test. The pretest and posttest score of control significantly different. It was supported by the
group were homogenous in their score. The result of independent t-test which shows that
result of the homogeneity variance test tobt (69) is 7.173 and tcrit (69) = 2.000 (Coolidge,
computation revealed that the Sig. 2000, p.276). It means that the obtained value
(probability) was 0.606. It was bigger than the of t was proven to be more than tcrit (7.173 >
alpha level of significance (0.05). It means that 2.000), then the null hypothesis was rejected.
the alternative hypothesis is rejected and both
pretest and posttest scores were homogenous. Effect Size
After the data had been proven to be The effect size was calculated to find out the
normally distributed and homogenous in their effectiveness of digital comic in teaching
variance, the researcher then compared the writing of narrative text. It is used to
control group’s score on their pretest and recognize whether the treatments given to
posttest. The result of the independent t-test the students help improve students’ writing
computation reported that both pretest and ability in writing narrative text or not. The
posttest scores of the control group were determination of effect size is stated as follow
significantly difference, where tobt (69) is 2.900 (Coolidge, 2000):
and tcrit (69) = 2.000 (Coolidge, 2000, p.276). It 𝒓
means that the obtained value of t was proven
to be less than tcrit (2.900 > 2.000), then the
null hypothesis was accepted. The independent t-test calculation for
Additionally, the result of independent t- both experimental and control group posttest
test was supported by the mean of both score reported that t value was 3.058, and
pretest and posttest score. The mean of the df value was 69. After completing the
control group’s pretest was 61.46 and the computation, it was found that the r value was
mean of control group’s posttest was 65.29. It 0.956. From the result of effect size
showed that there is no significant difference calculation, it can be concluded that the
between the control group’s pretest and teaching media by using digital comic had a
posttest score. large strength effect in improving student’s
writing skill
Pretest and Posttest Scores of
Experimental Group Discussion
The researcher also compared the pretest and In order to find out the first aim of this
posttest scores of the experimental group in research, writing test was used in pretest and
order to see their improvement before and posttest. Both experimental and control
after the treatment. First, the researcher group received the pretest before the
computed the normality distribution and treatment was given and also the posttest
homogeneity variance test. Second, the after the treatment was given. Additionally,
researcher continued to calculate the IBM SPSS (Statistical Product and Service
independent t-test. Solution) version 24 for Windows was also
The result of normality distribution and used to analyze the data from both pretest and
homogeneity variance test revealed that the posttest.
scores were normally distributed and were The pretest and posttest scores of the
also homogenous in their variance. The experimental and control group revealed that
normality distribution test suggested that the both groups have the normal and equal
107
Susilawati,
Teaching writing of narrative text through digital comic
scores. In addition, the independent t-test that there is a large strength effect in
computation of pretest and posttest scores for improving student’s writing ability. These
experimental and control group indicated that findings were in line with Rangga Darmawan
there was a significant difference between (2013) who have been said that comic can
their score, but the experimental group scores improve students’ writing ability of narrative
were more significant than the control group text.
score. Pretest mean for the experimental The findings of digital comic are similar
group was 60.14 and posttest mean for the to the result of the studies conducted by
experimental group was 69.22 Meanwhile, Kustianingsari and Dewi (2015), Heru Dwi
pretest mean for control group was 61.46 and Waluyanto (2006), and also Yunus and
posttest mean for control group was 65.29 It friends (2012). Based on Kustianingsari and
was clear that posttest mean for the Dewi (2015), comic is effective to be used in
experimental group was bigger than posttest teaching media. They say that comic can
mean for the control group, and it means that attract students’ motivation, and can tell the
the experimental group had bigger whole story briefly and clearly.
improvement rather than the control group. Furthermore, Heru Dwi Waluyanto
Furthermore, the data statistic (2006) reported that comic is effective to be
computation of pretest scores suggested that used as visual communication media in
the distribution data in both groups were developing students’ creativity. Waluyanto
normal, and the variance of their scores was (2006) tells that comic can be used as a tool
also equal. Additionally, the result of which is able to convey information
independent t-test computation of pretest in effectively and efficiently. In addition, comic
both group indicated that there was no can also be used as a tool to deliver a message.
significant difference between their score. It As a media, comic can deliver the learning
also can be seen from their mean scores. The messages clearly.
mean of experimental group was 60.14 and Moreover, Yunus and friends (2012)
the mean of control group was 61.46. It can explain the use of Information and
be said that both experimental and control Communication Technology (ICT) in
group have the equal initial ability as same as teaching and learning language is one of the
the researcher expectation. popular approaches employed in education
Moreover, the computation result of the and is said to be a beneficial tool in language
students’ posttest scores described that the teaching and learning. The digital comics can
distribution data of experimental and control be implemented in teaching and learning
group was normal, and the variance of them process with the purpose to motivate low
are homogenous. Then, the result of proficiency students in writing skill (Yunus &
independent t-test computation of posttest friends, 2012). The result of this research was
scores indicated that there was a significant also in line with their findings.
difference between experimental and control In summary, the previous studies
group scores by giving the different suggested that digital comic as teaching aid
treatments. The experimental group received give some positive effects to the students. The
a digital comic, but the control group did not result of this research also supported their
receive the digital comic as the treatment. statements, the use of digital comic was
The mean score of experimental group was proven to be successful to help improve the
69.22, and the mean score of control group student’s writing ability in writing narrative
was 65.29. It can be concluded that the text. In another word, digital comic was
experimental group has a better improvement effective to be used in teaching writing of
by giving a digital comic as the treatment in narrative text.
teaching writing of narrative text.
Based on the result above, it can be said The Advantages and the Disadvantages of
that the use of digital comic as the treatment Digital Comic in Teaching Writing of
in this research was proven to be successful to Narrative Text
help improve the student’s writing ability in Findings
writing narrative text. It was proven by the The second instrument of this research was a
result of effect size computation which questionnaire. This instrument was aimed to
showed that the r value was 0.956. It means know the advantages and the disadvantages of
108
Susilawati,
Teaching writing of narrative text through digital comic
digital comic used in teaching writing of old). It can be seen from the questionnaire
narrative text. The questionnaire was given number 10.
to the experimental group after they did the Hence, the overall result of the
posttest. There are 10 statements given to the questionnaire has shown the advantages and
students, then the result was analyzed by the disadvantages of the digital comic
using this following formula: implementation in teaching writing narrative
𝒇 text.
𝑷 = 𝒙 𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝒏
The result of the questionnaire number 1 Discussion
showed that there are 36 students (100%) who The questionnaire was used as the research
agree that digital comic can increase their instrument in order to know the second aim
interest in learning writing of narrative text. of this research. The result of questionnaire
The result of the questionnaire number 2 revealed the advantages and the
revealed that all of the students (100%) disadvantages of the digital comic
confirmed that digital comic can make the implementation in teaching writing of
material of narrative text easy to understand. narrative text. Firstly, the researcher
All of the students (100%) stated that discusses the advantages of the digital comic
digital comic can motivate them to learn implementation in teaching writing of
narrative text. It was the result of the narrative text. Secondly, the researcher
questionnaire number 4. discusses the disadvantages of the digital
As the result of the questionnaire comic implementation in teaching writing of
number 4, there are 100% of the students narrative text.
thought that digital comic can improve their There are some advantages of the digital
creative thinking ability in writing narrative comic implementation in teaching writing of
text. narrative text. As the first advantage, all of
The result of the questionnaire number 5 the students felt the benefits of using digital
showed that there are 100% of the students comic in helping them writing narrative text.
agree that digital comic can gain their All of the students (100%) agree that teaching
attention in learning writing narrative text. writing of narrative text through digital
The statement number 6 of the comic can increase their interest. This finding
questionnaire indicated that all of the was in line with Yang (as cited in Nisa & Al-
students (100%) said that digital comic can Hafidz, 2014) who says that comic can
make them more enthusiastic about learning maintain the learner’s interest. Mawaddah
writing narrative text. and Rinawati (2016, p.53) also says that
Furthermore, based on the questionnaire digital comic can attract student’s interest and
number 7, there are 5 students (13.9%) said attention.
that the use of digital comic in teaching Second, digital comic makes the material
writing of narrative text can make them lazy easy to understand. All of the students (100%)
to read the text without pictures. confirmed this statement. The statement is
Moreover, the statement number 8 of the supported by Mawaddah and Rinawati, and
questionnaire revealed that 11 students also Marianthi, Boloudakis, and Retalis (nd,
(30.6%) have a perception that the use of p.5). Digital comic can make the material easy
digital comic is not better than the other to understand by the students (Mawaddah
media (for example video, audio etc.) for and Rinawati, 2016, p.53). In addition,
teaching writing of narrative text. Marianthi, Boloudakis, and Retalis (nd, p.5)
In addition, the questionnaire number 9 explain that digital comic is easy to
showed that few of the students (5.56%) understand by the students.
showed that the use of digital comic in Third, there are 36 students (100%) who
teaching writing of narrative text makes them justified that digital comic can motivate them
speak inappropriately. to learn. The one who states that digital
In the last, there are 27 students (75%) comic can motivate the students to learn is
have the opinion that digital comic in Yang (2003, p.1). This statement is supported
teaching writing of narrative text is by Mawaddah and Rinawati (2016, p.53) and
appropriate to use in their age (15-17 years also Marianthi, Boloudakis, and Retalis (nd,
p.5). They say that digital comic is motivating
109
Susilawati,
Teaching writing of narrative text through digital comic
for the students. Yunus et al., (2012, p.57) also narrative text can make them speak
supported this statement by saying that inappropriately. The second disadvantage of
digital comic can motivate the learners to the digital comic implementation was
write in English. supported by Trimo (as cited in Lestari, Putri,
The fourth advantage of the digital comic & Yuniarti, 2009, p.4) who tells that comic
implementation is digital comic can improve contains some inappropriate words which can
their creative thinking ability. All of the affect the reader.
students (100%) agree that the use of digital Then, as the last disadvantage that was
comic in teaching writing of narrative text found in this research, 11 students (30.6%) of
can improve their creative thinking ability. the experimental group told that the use of
Putra & Iqbal conveys (2014, p.S.71) digital digital comic is not better than the other
comic can be used in the teaching-learning media (for example video, audio etc.) for
process with the purpose to improve creative teaching writing of narrative text. As Karunia
thinking ability and learning activity. (2011) stated in his paper titled “The Use of
Fifth, the result of the questionnaire Comic Strip in Teaching Reading of Narrative
informed that 100% of the experimental text “, comics are not better than other media.
group have a perception that digital comic can Thus, this research has found seven
gain their attention. This advantage was advantages and three disadvantages of the
stated by Marianthi, Boloudakis, and Retalis digital comic implementation in teaching
(nd, p.5). They reveal that digital comic can writing of narrative text. These findings were
gain student’s attention while they are in line with what have been said by the other
learning. researchers and expertise.
As the sixth advantage of digital comic
implementation, all of the students (100%)
expressed that digital comic can make the CONCLUSION
students more enthusiastic about learning. Based on the research questions which have
Hosler and Boomer (2011) tells that the been mentioned in the previous chapter, there
implementation of digital comic for learning are two conclusions made in this research.
makes a student enthusiastic. The first one is the effectiveness of using
The last, the result of the questionnaire digital comic in teaching writing of narrative
showed that the students gave the positive text. The second one is the advantages and
response to the implementation of digital the disadvantages of using digital comic in
comic. Three-quarters of the students (75%) teaching writing of narrative text. The
stated that digital comic is appropriate to be elaboration of each point is given below.
used in their age. Blake has a different First, the digital comic has been proven
perception. He (2013, p.1) says that using as an effective media to improve students’
stories of a comic to teach brings up a writing ability in writing narrative text. This
potential for story content to be seen as result was supported statistically by the
inappropriate for certain age groups. computation of independent t-test using IBM
Furthermore, this research also revealed SPSS Statistics v.24. Moreover, the
the disadvantages of the digital comic experimental group scores in posttest shown
implementation. For the first disadvantage of that their understanding of narrative text
the digital comic implementation, there are 5 improved, especially in the content of the text.
students (13.9%) of the experimental group Second, the questionnaire analysis
said that the use of digital comic in teaching showed that the use of digital comic in
writing of narrative text can make them lazy teaching writing of narrative text has the big
to read the text without a picture. This advantages than the disadvantages. The
statement was in line with Trimo (as cited in result of the questionnaire presented that all
Lestari, Putri, & Yuniarti, 2009, p.4) who of the students agreed that teaching writing
stated that comic is easy to read, but it makes of narrative text through digital comic can
someone lazy to read the text without increase their interest, make the material easy
pictures. to understand, motivate them to learn,
The result of the questionnaire showed improve their creative thinking ability, gain
that there are 2 students (5.56%) argued that their attention and make them more
the use of digital comic in teaching writing of enthusiastic about learning. In addition,
110
Susilawati,
Teaching writing of narrative text through digital comic
almost all of the students agreed that the use Kustianingsari, Nadia, & Dewi, Utari. (2015).
of digital comic is appropriate for their age. Pengembangan media komik digital pada
Despite the advantages of digital comic mata pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia tema
which have been mentioned before, there are lingkungan sahabat kita materi teks
also some disadvantages of the digital comic cerita manusia dan lingkungan untuk
implementation. The result of questionnaire siswa kelas V SDN Putat Jaya III/379
revealed some students agreed that the use of Surabaya. A paper submitted to Fakultas
digital comic in teaching writing of narrative Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri
text can make them lazy to read the text Surabaya.
without pictures and can make them speak Megawati, F., & Anugrahwati, M. (2010).
inappropriately. Additionally, some of them Comic strips: A study on the teaching of
agreed that the use of digital comic is not narrative texts to Indonesian EFL
better than the other media (for example students. TEFLIN Journal, 23, 183-205.
video, audio etc.) for teaching writing of doi:
narrative text. http://dx.doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal
.v23i2/183-205.
Nagin, C., & National Writing Project.
REFERENCES (2006). Because writing matters.
Anderson, M., & Anderson, K. (1997). Text Sanfransisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
types in English 2. Australia: Macmillan. Nisa, Fakhrun., & Al-Hafidz, Muhd,. (2014).
Comic Life Creator. (2016). Comic Life in Teaching writing a narrative text by
education. Retrieved from: using comic creator (Bitstrip) as a
http://www.homepages.dsu.edu/mgeary medium to second-grade students. JELT,
/comics/Comic_Life_in_Education.pdf. vol. 03 No. 1 Serie A, ISNN 2302- 3198,
Coolidge, Frederick L,. (2000). Statistics: A 72-77.
gentle introduction. London: SAGE Perrault, S. J,. (2008). Merriam-Webster’s
Publications Ltd. advanced learner’s English dictionary. New
Darmawan, Deni. (2013). Metode penelitian York: Merriam-Webster, Inc.
kuantitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Purnama, Unty Bany., Mulyoto & Ardiyanto,
Rosdakarya. Deny Try. (2015). Penggunaan media
Dittmar, Jakob F. (2012). Digital Comic. komik digital dan gambar pengaruhnya
Scandinavian Journal Of Comic Art (Sjoca), terhadap prestasi belajar IPA ditinjau
1(2), 82-91 dari minat belajar siswa. TEKNODIKA,
Djatmika & Wulandari. 2013. Writing 13(2).
narrative text. Bandung: Pakar Raya. Putra, Pramudya D. A., & Iqbal, Muhammad.
Elbow, Peter. (1998). Writing with power: (2014). Implementation of digital comic to
Techniques for mastering the writing process improve creative thinking ability in
(new ed.). New York: Oxford University integrated science study. A report of
Press. interntional conference on Mathematic,
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2000). Science and Education submitted to
How to design and evaluate research in Faculty of Mathematic and Natural
education. Boston: McGraw-Hill. Science, Semarang State University.
Jacob, Holly L., et al. (1981). Testing ESL Rebecca. (2003). Narrative text in teaching
composition: A practical approach. English. Retrieved from
Kharisma, D. S. (2009). The use of comic as an http://teachingenglish4all.wordpress.co
aid in teaching narrative text. A Sarjana m/2010/07/02/narrative-text-in-
Pendidikan Paper submitted to Semarang teaching-english/.
State University. Yunus, Melor M.D, et al. (2012). Using
Kurniawan, V., & Fitrawati. (2014). Teaching digital comic in teaching ESL writing.
writing hortatory exposition text by Recent Researches in Chemistry, Biology,
using stop and dare strategy to senior Environment and Culture. ISBN: 978-1-
high school students. JELT, 3(1), 159- 61804-060-2, 53-58.
167.
111