by
Henreitta D. Miranda
January 2018
The Philippine educational system had undergone a drastic change on its curriculum when the
former President Benigno “Noynoy” Aquino approved the K-12 curriculum implementation better
known as the Republic Act No. 10533, despite the various protests that it met from the people specially
the parents and the students as they the ones directly affected on this issue. According to a statement
given by the Department of Education (DepEd Primer, 2011), K-12 curriculum is geared to the
development of the students in order to meet the rigidity and steep competition in the industry. The K-
12 education plan had been published on October 5, 2010 as part of the education reform of the former
administration. The P-noy administration believed that in adding more years to the basic education , it
could help eradicate or at least diminish unemployment among his constituents since students will
undergo skills training that will supposedly hone and prepare them to acquire competencies so they will
be hirable as soon as they finish senior high, should they opt not to pursue college education.
The implementation of the K to 12 program of the former administration had not been very
easy, in fact it faced several oppositions and protest among the people who were directly affected by
this sudden change. The Supreme Court had accepted 5 petitions against the implementation of the
program which had been shrugged upon by Department of Education and the administration.
In this new curriculum, the educational system in the Philippines is said to be parallel with the
other countries; it is then said to be a compliance on the new trend of teaching which is “Teaching and
Learning in the 21st Century.” This teaching and learning in the 21st century was envisioned by several
students and teachers learn concepts. This concept of education as well believes that for the students to
be employable before finishing a degree, they should already possess the basic qualifications of a
hireable employee.
Based on concept of C21 and P21, a Canadian and American organizations respectively, the
thinking, collaboration, ethical citizenship and literacy on computer and digital technology
Now that the first batch of K-12 will be graduating in 2018, the next question is, “Is the Industry
ready to hire them?” From an interview done by GMA Network with Charito Salazar, Secretary- General
of National Industry- Academe Council (NIAC), the new K to 12 curriculum had done their part in this
educational reform. The students are equipped with the skills and competencies needed to get a job.
Salazar further claimed that most entry level jobs in the industry do not require college degree or
diploma. However, the industry at the moment seems to be very hesitant with the employment of
Further, on the interview of Rappler with Ramon del Rosario, chair of Philippine Business for
Education (PBEd), he stated that it is important for the people and the industry to accept and realize
that in reality, the graduates of K to 12 are already ready for the employment of most entry level jobs.
He emphasizes that most entry level employment do not require college degree.
DepEd aimed to align the basic education curriculum to the demands of the international
market. The K to 12 program is designed to immediately address the need for “in- demand” jobs. Based
on the program, the government had designed 4 tracks of learning for the students to choose from.
These tracks are namely: Sports track, arts and design track, academic track and the technical-
vocational- livelihood track. Where in, the Technical- Vocational- Livelihood (TVL) attracted 48.9% of the
Most senior high school students who will be graduating this 2018 has taken the Vocational
courses which will make them readily employable by local and foreign companies. The skills that were
produced by the K to 12 program are as follows: domestic helper, welder, plumber, tailor or
dressmaker, cook, butcher, beauty and nail care specialist, food and beverage, wellness massage, tour
guiding services and contact centers. These jobs do not require college degree and readily employable,
but the only problem is that, the government is bringing down the age of employable pool to a lower
age bracket, hence creating a higher number of unemployment in the long run.
From the write up of Tucay (2015) on Daily Inquirer, K to 12 program is designed and engineered
in way that students are given the license to drop out of school before finishing high school or readily
apply for a job after senior high. Though it appears to address the immediate need to income and
sustenance, still in the long run it will bloat the unemployment rate as the “in-demand” jobs that DepEd
believes to address are based on the demands of the international market. Tucay further discussed that
on the increase of employment and steep competition among the unemployed graduates and the
graduates of K to 12 program, lower wages will occur since potential employers will be faced with a
surplus of labor.
This was seconded by the research conducted by Ibon Foundation that stated, the country
deploys 4,500 workers abroad per day outpacing the 2800 average daily job creation domestically. This
Meanwhile, according to Jackson (2013) on her contribution to the Asia Pacific Journal entitled,
“ The Contribution of Work- Integrated Learning to Undergraduate Employability Skill Outcome,” similar
issue had happened in Australia when their educational system was reformed and the employability of
undergraduates had been integrated by means of developing students competencies via outcome. In
her study, it was concluded that students who finish this type of curricula were able to show that they
are ready for the job. Further, results indicated a remarkable improvement on perceived ability to
However, the interview with the President Love Basillate of Business for Education (PBEd) by
GMA Network, wherein she stated that in order for the K-12 curriculum to progress and attain its goals
in uplifting the employability of K-12 graduates, the private sector or the business community should be
an equal partner. Further, the industry needs to explicitly define the guidelines in the learning outcomes
and performance criteria that they need in order for the schools to comply with it.
There seems to be a problem with acceptance and the readiness of the industry in terms of
employing the new graduates of K to 12. According to the PBEd chair, there is still the lack of
acceptance among the industry. He mentioned that aside from being a new trend in employment, some
companies still would like to employ graduates since the country has a huge surplus of unemployed
graduates. For the companies to hire the graduates of a degree, this ensures that they are able to focus
on the task at hand since they will no longer wish to study in order to finish a degree.
Szablowska-Minor (2007) mentioned that in order for the industry to support this change in the
educational system, they should be presenting guidelines where students have chosen to align with. The
guidelines should create equal opportunity of both degree holders and senior high graduates. Both
Chalkley & Craig (2000) share the same point of view with the previously cited researcher, who
seconded that the academe and the industry should share the same goals. Industry should present
detailed expectations which will become the basis of the what should the students can do after they
graduate. Learning outcomes and criteria are great measurements relating to the readiness of the
potential employees. Further, the industry should also clearly state the competencies and qualities
employable for undergraduates, senior high graduates and degree holders. The guidelines will help
create progress and performance in the curriculum reform. This also can be a good basis for quality
assurance.
Incidentally, on another interview, Chair del Rosario cited that some highly organized companies
are ready to employ these graduates. They are the ones highly aggressive in embracing the new scheme
in the educational system. He further notes that the government should be more aggressive in putting
The preparedness of the government in the last pace of the K to 12 implementation still seems
to be weak since, the current administration, the Duterte Administration, lacks the familiarity and
Based on the interview with Education Undersecretary Jesus Mateo, he stated that DepEd’s
focus now on the last leg of the implementation of the program is on creating linkages though he
confessed that the former P-noy Administration was able to create on 13 linkages in the industry and
the lack of appeal of the Duterte Administration will surely weaken the possibility of the senior high
graduates’ employability. This claim was seconded by the statement of PBEd, that Philippine Education
Now, everyone is faced with the uncertainty of the employment of the 1st batch of graduates for
the new curriculum, K to 12. Although hope is there that will help the Filipinos to continue to look at the
effects of the new curriculum with positivity, still there are doubts, pessimism and negativity lurking
around that hinder from completely seeing the outcomes as projected by the initiator of this program.
References:
Chalkey, B. and Craig L. (2000) Benchmark Standards for Higher Education: Introducing the First Bench-
mark Standards for Higher Education Geography Journal of Geography in Higher Education.
Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 24(3): 395-398
Jackson, Denise (2013) The Contribution of Work- Integrated Learning to Undergraduate Employability:
Asia- Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, V2 N2 pp. 99-115
Szablowska- Midor, A. (2007) UNIGIS Studies in Poland- Learning GIS at a Distance, In K. Donert and P.
Charnzyski (Eds), Changing Horizons in Geography Education; Torun Poland: HERODOT Network
www. C2.com.ca
www. gmanetwork.com
www. inquierer.net
www. P21.org
www. youtube.com