JAPAN CHINA
RELOCATION OF None (Backwater ends at 670m 424 families (Infanta)
RESIDENCE upstream of the water) 4700 People (Daraitan Village)
DAMAGE TO PARK None Inundation of Tini Pak White
Rocks Springs and Caves
RIVER FLOW TO 30.45 m3/sec , an average 27.9 m3/sec, at the dam site
DOWNSTREAM AREA annual inflow at the dam site (100%) minus 6.95 m3/sec
AFTER COMPLETION (100%) minus 6.6 m3/sec (25%) =20.95 m3/sec
(22%) = 23.85%
SILT TRANSPORTATION 297, 160 cm/year without trap 188,800 cm/year
TO DOWNSTREAM AREA volume per year
MEAN MONTHLY 113.3 m3/sec minus 23.85 113.3 m3/sec minus 20.95
DISCHARGE AT THE m3/sec = 89.45 m3/sec m3/sec = 92.35 m3/sec
CONFLUENCE OF
KALIWA AND KANAN
FLOOD FLOW OF 3202 m3/sec (Return period: Danger of man-made flood by
DOWNSTREAM Several hundred years) operation of the gates (if the
gates are fully opened, the
flood flow will reach to more
than 5000 m3/sec)
COLLAPSE OF DAM Small massive concrete weir, Under investigation
no earthquake damages
DAMAGE BY No damage expected Dam will be damage heavily
DRIFTWOOD FLOW
INUNDATION None 440 Families
More rapid turnaround of the award. Many private organizations have a set schedule of
proposal reviews and presenting awards. With fewer levels of review, awards may be
made more rapidly.
Possibly fewer regulations than federal awards. This can stretch from length and cost
allowability to programmatic reporting of results.
Fewer applicants in proposal pool. Although the available funds may be much less, there
are normally fewer proposals to consider. A grants management system can be used to
generate reports that measure increased success rates.
Private sources may focus on emerging issues, new needs, populations emerging as
“special interests” and be more willing to “adapt” by collaborating with other sources,
providing alternative forms of assistance, and considering experimental activities.
Awards are often smaller and less likely to cover all project costs, and many do not cover
indirect costs
Unless the foundation is large, there may be less support for questions,
policies/procedures and fewer opportunities for personal contact and/or site visits
Areas of focus may change rapidly, so continual funding may be hard to predict
At some institutions, private funding may not be “prized” as highly as federal funding
because of perceptions that the review isn’t as rigorous as that of federal grants/contracts
Awards are often smaller and less likely to cover all project costs, and many do not cover
indirect costs
Unless the foundation is large, there may be less support for questions,
policies/procedures and fewer opportunities for personal contact and/or site visits
Areas of focus may change rapidly, so continual funding may be hard to predict
At some institutions, private funding may not be “prized” as highly as federal funding
because of perceptions that the review isn’t as rigorous as that of federal grants/contracts