H w m o c x N a n m of triglyceride oils is ( 5 ) . Except for the investigations of concentration when mass transfer resist-
obviously a complicated reaction in- Sims and Hilfman (20, 27), which em- ances were eliminated.
volving not only several simultaneous ployed low rates of agitation, all hydro-
a n d consecutive chemical steps but also genation studies of triglycerides reported Experimental Details
physical transfer steps of the reactants in the literature have been at relatively Hydrogenation runs were made in a
and products to and from the catalyst low hydrogen pressures, up to about 150 dead-end batch hydrogenator which was
surface. Factors of importance during p.s.i. Since the true effects of operating manufactured by Struthers-Wells Corp.
hydrogenation include the following : variables on the chemical reactions per for a working pressure of 7500 p.s.i.
se cannot be determined unless mass The agitator and baffles in the hydro-
Rate of hydrogenation expressed as transfer resistances are minimized, addi- genator were of standard dimensions for
the rate of decrease of the iodine value, tional kinetic information is still required optimum agitation (79). The equip-
which is essentially directly proportional over an extended range of operating ment and its operation were similar to
t o the unsaturation. variables, especially at higher pressures, those used previously (7). One liter of
Hydrogenation selectivity defined as
the preferential hydrogenation of poly- to clarify the reaction mechanism. cottonseed oil was used during most
unsaturated acid groups, such as linolenic The standard method, until recently, runs, and temperature control was
a n d linoleic, relative to the monoun- for determining the composition of poly- achieved during a run to within =!=2' C.
saturated groups, such as oleic acid. unsaturate groups in triglycerides was by manual control of the cold water or
Isomerization. Cis-trans geometrical ultraviolet spectroscopy; it is not only a steam lines. The oil was hydrogenated
isomerization has been demonstrated ( 5 ) tedious method but may have poor to an iodine value below 40, and six
t o have a significant effect on the soften- accuracy for hydrogenated oils ( 4 ) . samples were collected at intervals
ing point and consistency of the fats. Gas-liquid chromatography is appar- during most runs.
I n addition, positional isomerization ently more reliable than the ultraviolet Hydrogen solubilities measurements
also occurs in which the double bonds
migrate along the fatty acid chain (2, method (8, 72) and provides more in- were made in a n apparatus similar to
3, 70, 77). The effect of this latter type formation. As yet the chromatographic that used by Wiebe and Gaddy ( 2 4 )
of isomerization on the physical proper- technique has not been perfected for for the determination of the solubility of
ties of the product is not definitely estab- separation of the cis and trans isomers hydrogen in water a t high pressures.
lished as yet. so that infrared spectroscopy must still The hydrogenator served as the equilib-
be employed for this analysis. rium cell, and it was connected to the
Eldib and Albright (9) and Albright, Hydrogenation runs were made in the solubility apparatus by a high pressure
Wei, and Woods (7) have made the present investigation over a wide range line. The hydrogenator was loaded
only known investigations in which of operating variables using the best with cottonseed oil and hydrogen, and
sufficient agitation was employed tg analytical techniques available. The agitation was provided for a t least 15
minimize and probably essentially elimi- over-all rate of hydrogenation was minutes at constant temperature and
nate mass transfer resistances during the directly proportional to the degree of pressure. Since the connecting high
hydrogenation of triglycerides. Their unsaturation and to the amount of nickel pressure line was at a different tempera-
results indicate that the effects of operat- catalyst; the rate increased with pres- ture than that of the hydrogenator, it
ing variables on selectivity and iso- sure and temperature. The reaction on was flushed with about 20 ml. of oil.
merization are quite different than the the catalyst surface is apparently be- The buret system was adjusted to atmos-
results obtained by investigators who tween chemisorbed hydrogen atoms and pheric pressure and a small sample of
used relatively low degrees of agitation physically adsorbed unsaturate groups solution was then allowed to flow from
in which the surface reaction is con- the hydrogenator autoclave to the oil
trolling. Selectivity and isomerization buret. The sample size varied between
1 Present address, Universidad Catolica decreased with pressure but were little 20 and 50 ml., depending on the pressure
d e Chile, Santiago, Chile. affected by temperature and catalyst of the autoclave. Hydrogen began
-
IJY
-J
100 IN D U CTlON
PERIOD SLOPE = - k’/2.3
BATCH B OIL
The value of the over-all reaction rate
600 RS.1.G constant ( k ’ ) was obtained in each case
60 by multiplying the negative slope of the
4
t
0.04% Ni straight line by 2.3. The table in-
+ 1,250 R.P.M. ( R U N 71) dicates the values of k’ and induction
w
1,700 R.P.M. (RUN 6 5 )
‘s, period for different runs.
5 40 0
n
-
0 Analytical Techniques. T h e iodine
30 I I I I I I values of the samples as determined by
0 20 40 60 80 I00 I20
the Wijs method were compared to the
TIME, MINUTES
values calculated from gas-liquid chro-
Figure 1 . Hydrogenation i s first order reaction after induction period matographic results. In most cases, the
- ..
\ investigated is the middle portion of a
sigmoid curve where a straight line
- represents the data relatively well.
Relatively little change in diene values
PRESSURE, P.S.I.G. RUN (selectively) was noted with changes of
o 300 80 the operating temperature (Figure 2),
+ 600 79 but slightly more trans acids formed a t
0 1000 78 higher temperatures (Figure 3). Al-
A 1500 81 though a lo\ver temperature range (looo
to 135 O C.) was involved than previously
v
reuorted.
i
the temuerature effects on the
I05 90 75 60 45 30 15
IODINE V A L U E ( G A S - L I Q U I D CHROMATOGRAPHY) hydrogenation rate, selectivity, and iso-
merization are similar to those of Eldib
Figure 6. Increased pressure decreases trans isomers formed and Albright ( 9 ) ,who investigated lower
pressures but also used high agitation
rates. Investigators who used relatively
7 low degree of agitation found that
selectivity and isomerization increased
significantly with temperature (2, 5,
6 20, 27); mass transfer resistances were
6 undoubtedly significant so that hydrogen
transfer to the catalyst was slowed down.
m
\ 5 As discussed later, this phenomenon
n' would increase selectivity and isomeriza-
f tion.
' " L
X
N Catalyst Concentration. The values
- of k' were in most cases (see Runs 81,
E
3
82; 87, 88. 92) directly proportional to
UJ" the amount of catalyst. However, cata-
>- lyst concentration below 0,0470 nickel
t gave in some cases lower rates than those
4 2
m
3
predicted by a straight line relationship
1
0
(see Runs 26, 40, and 46 at 150 p.s.i.g.).
U J I The results indicate that transfer
resistances were minimized in most runs
since it varied linearly with the amount
0 of catalyst. This latter observation is
0 200 4 00 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600
based on the assumption that the cat-
HYDROGEN ABSOLUTE PRESSURE, P.S I A .
alyst activity remained constant during
Figure 7. Hydrogen solubility in cottonseed oil increases with not only pressure the run and that catalyst particles were
but also temperature unaffected by each other. The low
P
larger range, are most definitive. Figures Figure 8. Data should b e represented b y straight lines if mechanism i is correct
5 and 6 indicate that selectivity and
isomerization both decrease with pres-
sure increases u p to 1500 p.s.i.g. Other
investigators (2, 5, 9) also found similar
results in regards to pressure. Mechanism of the Reaction was proportional to the iodine value,
Hydrogen Solubility. Hydrogen Equation 3 can be reduced as follows:
solubilities in cottonseed oil were deter- Mass transfer of the reactants to the
mined in the range from 125” to 283’ catalyst surface, or of hydrogen from the k‘ = OH
F. and from 150 to 1500 p.s.i.g. Figure gas phase to the oil, occurs independently (D + B a; + C u i ) (4)
7 indicates hydrogen solubility expressed and simultaneously with the chemical Equation 4 can be rearranged into forms
as ml. S.T.P./g. oil us. the absolute steps; but at the high rates of agitation suitable for plotting for mechanisms
pressure of hydrogen for 125’ F. (51.8” employed these steps are assumed to have j, k, m ,and n as below:
C.), 220’ F. (104.4’ C.), and 283O F. offered negligible resistance. On the basis
(139.7’ (2.). Each point of Figure 7 that only chemical steps offered resistance Mechanism j : l / k ’ = l/aH +B (5)
is the average of three or more deter- to reaction, the seventeen mechanisms Mechanism k: l/k‘ =
minations. The resulting curves at
each temperature are essentially straight
proposed by Hougen and Watson (73)
for catalytic hydrogenation were tested.
(D + CU,)/UH+ B (6)
lines at lower pressures-Le., they follow Their equations were simplified and Mechanism rn: (aH)1/2/k’ =
Henry’s law. The pressure range for
linearity decreases with temperature.
modified by the following assumptions :
the over-all reaction is irreversible (22) ;
D/(UH)”z +B (7)
Mechanism n:
The solubility of hydrogen increases the iodine value of the oil is directly
slightly with temperature. proportional to the activity of the un- +
( a ~ / k ’ ) ’ ’ ~ B ( u H ) ~ ’ ~CU, +D (8)
The constants of the following empiri- saturated, a,; the activity of the dis- For mechanisms k and n, the activity of
cal equation were obtained with a solved hydrogen, u H , is equivalent to the the chemisorbed saturated, a,, was also
Datatron computer, and the equation mole fraction, x , of the hydrogen in the assumed to be either zero, very small, or
represents the solubility data within oil (calculated from the hydrogen solu- constant. The first possibility is prob-
i5y0: bility data assuming a molecular weight able since there is no chemisorption of
of 860 for the oil); and the solubility of the unsaturate in these mechanisms.
S = -7.330(10-2) + 2.208(10-3)P + the hydrogen is not affected by the pres- Equations 5 through 8 were plotted
1.732(10-6)PT - 2.952(10-8)PT2 - ence of the catalyst. Letters used for using the data from these investigations
2.924(10 -7)p (2) the mechanisms correspond to those at 105’ and 110” C. Equation 7 does
i
employed by Hougen and Watson. not plot as a straight line so mechanism
where
Preliminary screening, such as previously m is improbable. Equations 5 and 6 plot
S = ml. hydrogen S.T.P./g.oil outlined ( 9 ) , leaves only mechanisms
P = p.s.i.a. similarly, and Figure 8 indicates that the
T = OF. j , k, rn, and n as the ones likely to repre- plots are almost straight lines. Equation
sent the hydrogenation of cottonseed oil. 8, as shown in Figure 9, gives a good
This is an empirical equation and is A common characteristic of each is that straight line fit at both temperatures.
obviously not accurate a t low pressures. the unsaturates are not chemisorbed in The screening process has left three of
At zero pressure, the solubility must be any of them, and the basic form of these the original seventeen mechanisms.
zero, but the equation indicated a small four mechanisms is as follows (73): Mechanism j . Reactant between un-
positive value. Since the solubility us. saturated in the liquid phase and molec-
pressure plots up to 150 p.s.i.g. are ularly chemisorbed hydrogen, desorption
essentially straight lines, it is recom- of saturate controlling.
mended that for low pressure deter- where the exponents u, w , and y depend Mechanism k. Reaction between un-
minations the equation be used to cal- on the particular mechanism; B, C, saturate in the liquid phase and molec-
culate first the solubility value a t 150 and D are constants and functions of the ularly chemisorbed hydrogen, surface
p.s.i.g. The solubility results at lower absorption and reaction rate constants ; reaction controlling.
pressures can be calculated using a and r is the reaction rate. Since the Mechanism n. Reaction between un-
straight line interpolation. over-all hydrogenation rate of a run saturated in the liquid phase and atomi-
jI
ON POINTS
coverage with hydrogen atoms affords a
I I , , large probability to pairs of hydrogen
atoms being held in the right geometrical Literature Cited
15
1.4 2.o 2.6 3.2 position for reaction with ethylenic (1) Albright, L. F., Wei, C. H., Woods)
m groups in the unsaturated fatty acid
radicals. Conditions which favor con-
J. M., J . Am. Oil Chemists’ Sac. 37, 315
(1960).
Figure 9 . The good fit of data b y (2) Allcn, R. R., Zbid., 33, 335 (1956).
tinued saturation of the catalyst surface
straight lines indicates mechanism R is (3) Allen, R. R., Kiess, 4 . A.: Ibid.: 32, 400
with hydrogen will increase the rate of (1955).
probable reaction and decrease selectivity, which (4) Am. Oil Chemists’ Soc., Chicago, Ill.,
is probably caused by preferential “Official and Tentative Methods,” re-
vised to January 1, 1951.
physical adsorption of linolein groups as (5) Bailey, A. E.: “Industrial Oil and Fat
cally chemisorbed hydrogen, surface re- compared to olein groups. Since hydro- Products,” p. 673, Interscience, New
action controlling. gen solubility depends mainly on pres- York, 195I .
sure and increases slightly with tempera- (6) Beek, O., in “Advances in Catalysis,”
Final choice is for mechanism n o n Vol. 11, p. 151, Academic Press, Inc.,
ture, pressure and temperature should New York, 1950.
t h e basis of the following considera- increase the over-all rate of hydrogena- (7) Blekkingh, J. J. -4., Discussions fiuraduy
tions: tion and decrease selectivity, if it is Soc.: 1950, N o . 8, p. 200.
Better fit of data to equation. assumed that the relative rates of reac- (8) Craig, B. M., Murty, N. L., J . Am. Oil
Experimental evidence (6, 23) of Chemists’ SOC. 36, 549 (1959).
the atomic behavior of hydrogen w h e n tion on the catalyst surface do not (9) Eldib, I. A,, Albright, L. F., IND.
chemisorbed on metals, particularly change. The effect of temperature on ENG.CHEM.49, 825 (1957).
nickel. the over-all rate will be much larger (10) Feuge, R. O., Pener, M. B., O’Con-
A hydrogenation-dehydrogenation than that on selectivity because of the nor, R. T., Field, E. T., J . Am. Oil
step that involves atomic hydrogen Chemists’ Sac. 28, 420 (1951).
effect of temperature per se on reaction (11) Feuge, R. O., Cousins, E. R., Fore,
@ , 3 ,7 ) . rates. I t is not surprising then that S. P., DuPre, E. F., O’Connor, R. T.,
under condition of minimum mass Ibid.,30, 454 (1953).
The slopes and intercepts of the straight (12) Herb, S. F., Magidman, P., Riemen-
lines of Figure 9 are as follows : transfer resistances, selectivity should
show little change with temperature. schneider, R. W., Ibid.,37, 127 (1960).
(l?) Hougen, 0. A., Watson, K. M.,
Slope = m = l / ( k Ct2)1’2 (9) When the catalyst surface is sparsely Chemical Process Principles,” pp. 947-9,
Intercept = I = l/(k covered with hydrogen atoms! these Wiley, New York, 1948.
KHCt2)1/2 (10) (14) J . Am. Oil Chemists: Sac. 3 6 , 627
atoms are held more strongly to the
KH (m/Z)z (11) catalyst than when they are crowded by (1959).
(15) Jenkins, G. I., Rideal, E:. K., J .
Values of K,, as calculated from other hydrogen atoms; but not so Chem. Soc. (London) 1955, 2490.
Figure 9 and Equation 11, are 2.26 for strongly as to prevent their moving and (16) Orr, C . H., Callen, J. E., Ann. N . Y .
taking positions relatively far from their Acad. Sci. 72, 649 (1959).
105’ C. and 3.62 for 1 1 0 O C . K H is (17) Pauls, A. C., Comings, E. W., Smith,
expressed as a function of temperature: neighbors ( 6 ) . Under these conditions, J. M., A.Z.Ch.E. Journal 5, 453 (1959).
the probability that the hydrogen atoms (1 8) Riemenschneider, R. W., Southern
would be in favorable positions to react Research Laboratories, U.S.D.A., pri-
two a t a time with ethylenic groups vate communication, 1959.
would be small. Thus neither the geo- (19) Rushton, J. H., Costich, E. W.,
Calculations indicate that AH = 27 Everett, H. J., Chem. Eng. Progr. 46,
kcal. per g. mole. and A S = 70 kcal. per metric nor energy relationship would be 395 (1950).
g. mole O K. The bond energy of a very favorabIe to hydrogenation, and (20) Sims, R. J., J . A m . Oil Chemiuts’ SOC.
adequate time would be allowed for the 29, 347 (1952).
hydrogen molecule is about 103 kcal. ( 6 ); (21) Sims, R. J., Hilfman, L., Zbid., 30,
the hydrogen atom is bound to the catalyst preferential physical adsorption of linoleic 410 (1953).
surface with an energy of about 76 kcal. acid groups as compared to oleic acid (22) Sussman, M. V., Potter, C., IND.
The postulated mechanism is now com- groups. The selectivity and isomeriza- EKG.CHEM.46, 457 (1954).
pared with the known facts of ethylene tion characteristics of the hydrogenation (23) Taylor, T. I.: in “Catalysis,” Vol.
would then be higher. V, p. 257 (P. H. Emmett, ed.), Rein-
hydrogenation. Beek‘s results ( 6 ) in- hold, New York, 1957.
dicate that hydrogen adsorbs readily on When transport phenomena are criti- (24) M’iebe, R., Gaddy, V. L., Heins,
catalytic films of nickel prepared by cal, hydrogen can not be supplied to thc C., IND.ENG. CHEM.24, 823 (1924).
evaporation of nickel in vacuum. The catalyst surface rapidly enough to RECEIVED
for review September 19, 1960
heat of chemisorption is about 30 kcal. maintain a high hydrogen concentration. ACCEPTEDFebruary 6, 1961
per g. mole for a sparsely covered sur- Since temperature rapidly increases the
Division of Industrial and Engineering
face, and decreases to a value of about reaction rate constants for hydrogena- Chemistry, 138th Meetin?, ACS, New
18 kcal. per g. mole when the surface is tion, hydrogen depletion a t the catalyst York, September 1960.