48260

Engineering Project Management

Final Project Report Marking Guide

Group No.
Grading (based on UTS Grading Schema for Coursework Subjects)
HD (85–100): Work of outstanding quality on all requirements of the assignment.
D (75–84): Work of superior quality on all requirements of the assignment.
C (65–74): Work of good quality showing more than satisfactory achievement on all requirements of the assignment.
P (50–64): Work showing satisfactory achievement on all requirements of the assignment.
F (0–49): Work showing unsatisfactory achievement on one or more requirements of the assignment.

Report structure and presentation

• Executive summary
o Cost
o Duration
o Key milestones
o Other
• Table of contents
• Table of figures
• Use of headings and sub-headings
• Diagrams and pictures
o Headers,
o Meaningful
• Language
o Style academic/business
o Grammar
• Page numbers
• References

Scope overview
• Objectives, Goals, Needs,
• Deliverables
• Milestones
• Limits, Exclusions
• Assumptions
• In-scope work
• Out-of-scope work
• External dependencies
• Others (e.g.: stakeholders, disclaimers, etc..)
WBS
• Diagram logic
• Diagram readability
• Appropriate level of detail

Network Diagram
• Activity sequencing
• Minimise time to complete
• Critical path
• Gantt Chart
• Use of MS Project

Risk Management
• Risk Register
• Risk Treatment
• Risk management incorporated in project

Resources
• Resource list (human resources)
• Resource list (Non-human resources)
• Resource histogram

Costs
• Cost breakdown
• Cost breakdown (groups of activities, phases, deliverables)
• Cost breakdown (direct, indirect, general & administrative)
• S-curve (total costs)
• Estimation assumptions
• Updated, current costs only (2012, or inflation-adjusted)
• References (when applicable)
• Cost labelling (A$, ‘000, K, M, etc.)

Financials
• Summary

References
• Style
• Sources

Appendices
• Details

Document management – revision history

Comments: