TACLOBAN COLLEGE
Tacloban City
Presented by
SESIO, VANESSA L.
May 2014
APPROVAL SHEET
The thesis attached hereto, entitled “A Case Study on the Disaster Preparedness of the
Municipality of Balangkayan, Eastern Samar: The Case of Super Typhoon Yolanda”, prepared
and submitted by Salve Gloria Evaiza Afable Mercader and Vanessa Lira Sesio, in partial fulfilment
of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts in Social Sciences Major in Political Science,
is hereby accepted.
Accepted and approved for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts in Social Sciences
Major in Political Science
Grade:_______
May 2014
ii
ABSTRACT
Mercader, Salve Gloria Evaiza Afable and Sesio, Vanessa Lira. “A CASE STUDY ON THE DISASTER
PREPAREDNESS OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BALANGKAYAN, EASTERN SAMAR: THE CASE OF
SUPER TYPHOON YOLANDA.” An Undergraduate Research Project Presented to the Division of
Social Sciences, University of the Philippines Visayas Tacloban College, May 2014.
Nested sampling was utilized in order to determine the key informants for this case study.
In result, the key informants comprised by the Local Government Officials and the Civil Society of
the respected municipality were selected in determining the locality’s preparedness for super
typhoon Yolanda. The objectives of disaster preparedness derived from the National Risk
Reduction Management Plan of the Philippines were used as a guide in conducting the case study
in Balangkayan, Eastern Samar.
It was found that there is no existing disaster preparedness plan in the municipality of
Balangkayan, Eastern Samar during super typhoon Yolanda. Despite of the fact, there were no
recorded casualties in the municipality although there were apparent damages caused by the
typhoon.
The study concludes with the notion that political participation of the civil society with
the immediate preparations of the Local Government Unit during super typhoon Yolanda has
been an important factor in connection to the absence of accounts of casualties in the
municipality despite the nonexistence of a disaster preparedness plan. Hence, this study does not
validate the idea of the Modern Disaster Theory claiming that disasters law is the best portfolio
of legal rules.
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We would like to extend our deep appreciation to the people who inspired and guided us
all the way in making this research.
To our adviser, Professor Ladylyn B. Lim, we offer our most sincere gratitude for guiding
us during the whole research process and for inculcating us values as young researchers.
To the honorable Officials of the town of Balangkayan, Eastern Samar, we extend our
thanks for offering us their warmest welcome and accommodation, as well as to the local folks
who gave us their honesty on the interviews conducted.
We offer our genuine appreciation to our Political Science classmates who motivated us
to keep going and for being there to share the experience. Same goes to the whole Political
Science family especially Mr. Rene Alvin F. Oquendo for lending us readings related to our study.
To our dear families for their untiringly love and support for us in many ways, and for
serving as inspirations all throughout our college years, we dedicate all our efforts, our humble
gratitude and love.
To our home during the last four years, the University of the Philippines Visayas Tacloban
College, we extend our most sincere appreciation.
To our Almighty Father for making all the things possible for us, for giving us hope and for
the unfailing love and enlightenment, we thank You dear Lord.
iv
LIST OF TABLES
v
LIST OF APPENDICES
Balangkayan, E. Samar
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title i
Approval Sheet ii
Abstract iii
Acknowledgement iv
List of Tables v
List of Appendices vi
Table of Contents vii
Bibliography
Appendix
vii
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
“No one is immune to the effects of a disaster and it is important we take steps to
prepare”.
In the context of the changing climate relative to the development and industrialization
of countries in the global spectrum, humanity is challenged by nature that fights back through
calamities. Since then, people found little and slow measures to mitigate or lessen the effects of
unexpected disasters as such, countries frequently visited by natural calamities have become
Tropical countries such as the Philippines is prone to typhoons as it lies in the Pacific
Ocean where cyclones are mostly formed. Being in this location, the Philippines experiences an
average of twenty (20) tropical cyclones every year. Half of these are destructive which includes
other weather hazards such as thunderstorm, heavy rainfall, southwest and northeast monsoons
(DRRRM, 2008). From year 1984 to 2001, Visayas had the most damages and deaths due to
typhoons that visited the country as shown in Table 1 and Table 2 on the next page. In 1990,
typhoon Ruping made a damage of 10.85 billion in Central Visayas and in Eastern Visayas, 5,101
deaths were recorded because of typhoon Uring in the year 1991 which is clearly shown in Table
1
Table 1. Disastrous Typhoons in Terms of Damage
YEAR NAME AREAS AFFECTED DAMAGES
(Billions)
1990 T. Ruping Central Visayas 10.85
1995 T. Rosing Southern Luzon 9.30
1993 T. Kadiang Central Luzon 8.75
1988 T. Unsang Southern Luzon 5.64
1984 T. Nitang Northeastern Mindanao/Visayas 3.91
2001 T. Feria Luzon 3.51
1991 T. Trining Northern Luzon 3.47
2001 T. Nanang Visayas 3.25
2003 T. Harurot Luzon 3.23
1995 T. Mameng Visayas 2.80
1988 T. Yoning Visayas 2.75
2004 T. Igme Southern Luzon/Bicol 2.45
1993 T. Monang Southern Luzon 2.34
1985 T. Saling Central Luzon 2.18
1992 T. Maring Northern Luzon 2.16
1987 T. Herming Northern Visayas 2.06
2004 T. Marce Luzon 1.93
1984 T. Undang Eastern Visayas 1.54
1990 T. Iliang Luzon 1.50
1994 T. Katring Luzon 1.43
1989 T. Saling Southern Luzon 1.39
1989 T. Goring Northern Luzon 1.36
Source: DRRRM, 2008
2
One of the world’s strongest typhoon in recent history that hit the Philippines on
November 8, 2013, with a wind speed of 305 kilometers an hour was super typhoon Haiyan—
Geographic Daily News, 2013). The BBC News reported that the National Disaster Agency says
that 5, 209 people are now known to have lost their lives, with many more still missing (November
22, 2013).
Super typhoon Yolanda made landfall in the Philippines affecting Visayas Region,
particularly in Mindoro, Panay, Cebu, Bohol, Leyte and Samar. According to the disaster council
of the Philippines, damage to infrastructure reached P15.7 billion while damage to agriculture
reached P15.1 billion. The affected families in Visayas region rose from 2,335,031 to 2,376,217 or
around 11.2 million individuals. The number of damaged houses also went up to 1,168,958 from
1,168,909 (Sun Star Publishing, Inc., 2013). Consequently, this phenomena fostered the need of a
Balangiga, Lawaan were severely devastated. Furthermore, little attention was given to towns in
Samar despite of its damages. In Balangkayan, 400 houses were recorded to have been washed
out during the said typhoon (GMA News, 2013). A total of 1,030 families were affected in the
town of Balangkayan, E. Samar with 499 totally damaged houses and 354 partially damaged
houses (DILG Balangkayan). According to the Crop Damage Report of the Department of
Agriculture of Balangkayan, a total of 305 farmers were affected with a total value of 2,163,850.00
production of loss. According to their Fisheries Damage Report, a total value of 885,000.00 were
Furthermore, the said municipality was chosen as the research locale for this study for
the reason that despite of the damages of houses and some infrastructures, there were no
3
recorded casualties. This somehow entails how its local government prepared for super typhoon
Yolanda with respect to the participation of the local constituents in Balangkayan, Eastern Samar.
The researchers believe that by choosing the municipality of Balangkayan as the locale of the
study, it may ameliorate the disaster preparedness of the focused community and other
choosing research locales which are not given much attention and thus improve their disaster
preparedness.
The World Health Organization emphasizes preparedness as the “activities and measures
taken in advance to ensure effective response to the impacts of hazards, including the issuance
of timely and effective early warnings and the temporary evacuation of people and property from
threatened locations. It also pertains to the pre-disaster activities, including an overall strategy,
policies and institutional and management structures that are geared to helping at risk
communities safeguard their lives and assets by being alert to hazards and taking appropriate
On the other hand, “preparedness connotes a decision process for future anticipated
events with estimated probabilities of occurrences and of consequences, in which decisions and
their associated actions are implemented in advance of a natural or human-made disaster and
evaluating and taking coercive action in an effort to ensure effective coordination during incident
response.”
4
Research Objectives
This research study aims to look into the disaster preparedness in the municipality of
Balangkayan, which is one of the localities devastated by Super Typhoon Yolanda in Eastern
1. To look into the availability of the Disaster Plan in the municipality of Balangkayan,
Eastern Samar.
3. To gather the views of the Civil Society regarding the disaster preparedness of
Research Questions
1. Is there an available Disaster Plan in Balangkayan, Eastern Samar? Why or why not?
2. What were the different activities conducted by the local government unit of
3. What are the views of the Civil Society in relation to the disaster preparedness of
Theoretical Framework
This study is anchored in the Modern Disaster Theory by which, according to Jim Chen,
treats Disaster Law as the best portfolio of legal rules (2011:1121). According to the Disaster Law
and Policy, at first glance, disaster law seems to be nothing but a collection of legal rules that
happen to come into play when communities have suffered severe physical damage, but at a
5
deeper level, it is about assembling the best portfolio of legal rules to deal with catastrophic risks
– a portfolio that includes mitigation, emergency response, compensation and insurance, and
rebuilding strategies (2010:n.p.). It is the mission of disaster law to increase the preparedness of
all social institutions, including official and non-governmental actors, to anticipate sudden,
calamitous events, and to bring the optimal portfolio of legal rules to bear when such events occur
(Chen, 2011:1123). Moreover, optimal legal preparedness for disaster consists of identifying,
adopting and maintaining that portfolio of rules at the frontier of efficient governance (Chen,
2011:1121). The author also suggested that “disaster law may have an even greater role to play
compensation, and reconstruction in the face of disaster. Sharpening these tools enhances the
According to NDRRMP (2011:25), the fourth objective of disaster preparedness states: “to
develop and implement comprehensive national and local disaster preparedness policies, plans
and systems”. This highlights the importance of the presence of a timely disaster preparedness
plan in order to ensure the preparedness of a communities in the event of a disaster. Moreover,
disaster preparedness plan has two types (NDRRMP, 2011:43). One is focused on the various
activities that need to be done to ensure proper and timely disaster response operations, and the
other is focused on the safety of the people and the plans to increase their level of awareness and
This study also proposes a three-dimensional notion in the field of politics that supports
in carrying out disaster preparedness. The concept of decentralization, policy process, and
political participation and political culture reflects the dynamics of state and non-state actors
6
Decentralization is defined as “the expansion of local autonomy through the transfer of
powers and responsibilities away from national bodies” (Heywood, 2007). Decentralization entails
that the “state is the ultimate hierarchical institution which consolidates all other hierarchical
institutions” (Burchill, et. al.,2005). The study would look into the mechanism of a decentralized
country like the Philippines, in the process of taking the policy of disaster preparedness beginning
from the national level, regional level and finally into the local level where the study is focused,
According to Andrew Heywood (2007), “policy process relates to the mechanisms through
which public (government) policies are made”. The National Disaster Risk Reduction and
Management Plan, effective by the year 2011 up to 2028, is embedded by a legalized framework
(Republic Act 10121) in the Philippines built to address disaster problems in the country. It is a
policy since it is a formal decision made by the government and actions on disaster preparedness
will be initiated by the Department of Interior and Local Government. Policy process is carried out
through policy initiation, policy formulation, policy implementation and policy evaluation. These
steps serves as pillars in determining the outcome of the action of the government, more
importantly in the context of the Municipality of Balangkayan, Eastern Samar in terms disaster
preparedness.
On the other hand, coordination between the civil society and the government is an
essential factor in the operation of the legalized framework. Through decentralization, the people
Political participation refers to all the actions of individuals in a community. The researchers
believe that political participation would ease the implementation of inculcating knowledge and
capabilities of people in the community in relation to disaster preparedness. In this study, political
culture in the locality is considered in order to find out how policies are carried out with respect
7
to the attitudes of the people in the community. Almond and Verba, enumerated three types of
political culture: participant political culture wherein people pay close attention to politics,
subject political culture wherein people have cognitive knowledge about the political system but
remain passive, and parochial political culture wherein people feel the absence of a sense of
Burchill, et. al. (2005) stresses decentralization and claims that “it stems from a sense that
while global environmental and social/economic problems operate on global scale, they can be
successfully responded to only by breaking down the global power structures which generate
them through local action and the construction of smaller-scale political communities and self-
reliant economies.” Moreover, an argument in green politics stems from the notion that “small-
scale communities would be too parochial and potentially self- interested to provide atmospheres
conducive to cross community cooperation” (Burchill, et. al.,2005). The study will provide the
mechanisms of the policy process in relation to the decentralization of government and how
public participation affects the flow and execution of the policy. The three indicators (policy
process, decentralization, and political participation and political culture) would help determine
the conditions of the disaster preparedness with the use of a plan in Balangkayan, Eastern Samar
As one of the priority areas of Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Plan,
preparedness plays a vital role in carrying out effective actions in every sector in response to
awareness among its people, it is expected that being prepared would eventually lead them into
8
Recently, Super Typhoon Yolanda devastated a large area in Eastern Visayas Region which
resulted into vast reparations of properties and mortality of people. Balangkayan, Eastern Samar
is noted to be one of the localities affected by the typhoon. In relation to this natural calamity’s
destruction of Balangkayan, Eastern Samar as the research locale, this study will provide an insight
of the National Disaster Risk Reduction Management Plan covering Disaster Preparedness as one
of its core functions and the Local Disaster Preparedness Plan in Balangkayan, Eastern Samar.
Moreover, this study will provide information regarding the dynamics or the process of
implementing the Disaster Preparedness Plan in Balangkayan, Eastern Samar vis-à-vis the National
Disaster Preparedness Plan. This study will also contribute to the assessment of the effectiveness
of the current disaster preparedness in Balangkayan, Eastern Samar. Furthermore, this study will
The National Risk Reduction Management Plan (NDDRM) of the Philippines under
Republic Act 10121 has four distinct priority areas, namely, Disaster Prevention and Mitigation,
Disaster Preparedness, Disaster Response, and lastly, Disaster Recovery and Rehabilitation.
Consequently, this research study only focuses on one of these priority areas, which is Disaster
Preparedness. Furthermore, this study only focuses on typhoons which is a type of natural hazards
considering that this study concentrates on the case of Super Typhoon Yolanda in the context of
Balangkayan, E. Samar.
Inasmuch as this study only involves one of the municipalities of Eastern Samar,
particularly, Balangkayan, E. Samar, its results may not apply to the rest of the municipality nor to
9
other localities in Eastern Samar which were affected by Super Typhoon Yolanda. The results of
Despite these limitations, the researchers hope that the results of this study will
contribute significant data that will pave the way towards the improvement of the efficiency and
Definition of Terms
affected communities who experience severe danger and incur loss of lives and properties causing
disruption in its social structure and prevention of the fulfilment of all or some of the affected
response to the impact of hazards, including the issuance of timely and effective early warnings
and the temporary evacuation of people and property from threatened locations. It includes plans
or preparations made to save lives and to help response-and-rescue operations (DRR Resource
Disaster Preparedness refers to the state in which individuals and groups of a community
have developed plans, allocated resources, and established procedures of saving lives and
preventing further damage to property in the event of a disaster. It is one of the measures of
taking control events regarding disaster risk management, involving factors such as planning,
advocacy, education and training, and resources (DRR Resource Manual, 2008, p. 6).
A typhoon is a large, powerful and violent tropical cyclone. It is a low pressure area
rotating counter-clockwise and containing rising warm air that forms over warm water in the
Pacific Ocean. It can inflict terrible damage due to thunderstorms, violent winds, torrential rain,
10
floods, landslides, large and very big waves associated with storm surges (DRR Resource Manual,
2008, p. 21).
On the other hand, a storm surge is a rise of seawater above normal sea level on the coast,
generated by the action of weather elements such as cyclonic wind and atmospheric pressure.
Depending upon the shape of the coastline and the slope of the sea bed, storm surge can sweep
across large portions of coastal area (DRR Resource Manual, 2008, p. 28).
CHAPTER II
As the central focus in this research, disaster preparedness will give emphasis on how a
community will be able to handle the effects of a catastrophe. The subject has been an essential
part of recent studies with regards to disaster risk reduction and disaster management, including
works of other researchers and framework of institutions in the national and international arena.
Furthermore, the availability of a disaster preparedness plan will serve as a guide on how a
community will be able to handle the effects of a catastrophe. With the aim of introducing disaster
preparedness, this would entail citing some literature that would give ample understanding of
The Hyogo Framework for Action Guidance and Indicator Package (2008:3) has noted that
human, material, economic or environmental losses which exceed the ability of the affected
community or society to cope using its own resources. A disaster is a function of the risk process.
11
On the other hand, preparedness pertains to the “pre-disaster activities that are
undertaken within the context of disaster risk management and are based on sound risk analysis.
institutional structure, warning and forecasting capabilities and plans that define measures
geared to helping at-risk communities safeguard their lives and assets by being alert to hazards
and taking appropriate actions in the face of an imminent threat or actual disaster (HFA Guidance
and Indicator Package, 2008:42). Preparedness involves anticipating problems that might be faced
in organizing response activities and creating plans to address them (Henstra, 2010:238).
for an effective emergency preparedness and response. Republic Act 10121 (2010:3) defines
emerging situations that might threaten society or environment and establishes arrangements in
advance to enable timely, effective and appropriate responses to such events and situations.
The Hyogo Framework for Action Guidance and Indicator Package (2008:3) has noted that
human, material, economic or environmental losses which exceed the ability of the affected
community or society to cope using its own resources. A disaster is a function of the risk process.
As the Fifth Priority of the Hyogo Framework for Action, strengthening disaster
preparedness for effective response at all levels includes (1) disaster management capacity:
policy, technical and institutional capacities, (2) dialogue, coordination and information exchange
between disaster managers and development sectors, (3) regional approaches to disaster
response, with risk reduction focus, (4) review exercise preparedness and contingency plans, (5)
12
emergency funds and (6) voluntarism and participation (HFA Guidance and Indicator Package,
2008:50).
To provide a narrower outlook, the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management
“…provides for the key strategic actions that give importance to activities revolving
around community awareness and understanding; contingency planning; conduct of local
drills and the development of a national disaster response plan. Risk-related information
coming from the prevention and mitigation aspect is necessary in order for the
preparedness activities to be responsive to the needs of the people and situation on the
ground. Also, the policies, budget and institutional mechanisms established under the
prevention and mitigation priority area will be further enhanced through capacity building
activities, development of coordination mechanisms. Through these, coordination,
complementation and interoperability of work in DRRM operations and essential services
will be ensured. Behavioral change created by the preparedness aspect is eventually
measured by how well people responded to the disasters. At the frontlines of
preparedness are the local government units, local chief executives and communities.”
Basically, preparedness include those activities related to ensuring that people are
prepared and response will be carried out efficiently and effectively. It requires good linkages with
associated training and field exercises, which all should be supported by institutional, legal and
community in the event of a disaster. Gaillard and Mercer (2012:99) emphasize that disasters
result from the non-application of existing laws, whether for enforcing construction codes or the
protection of natural resources and from the unequal distribution of resources within the society.
Thus, doctrine awareness is vital in the sense that the plan would provide the use of common
13
language and assumptions, as well as clearly articulated and commonly understood missions,
Haimes (2012:289) also suggested that “anticipating and planning for emergent forced
changes through disaster preparedness and other risk management actions will necessarily
improve the resilience of the system. Furthermore, he also claimed that emergency preparedness
requires planning for multiple decision-making perspectives. This planning includes factors such
as human resources, technology and policies; interface arrangements among agencies at all levels
(readiness must involve the public and private sector, not only government and non-government
organization); and interoperability and information sharing that transcend security, primarily
services such as police, fire and emergency management services but also health and safety,
transportation and critical utilities and infrastructures, among others (Haimes, 2012:294).
In line with this, Somers and Svara (n.d:187) claimed that such plans must clearly identify
the duties and responsibilities of each local department during an emergency, including the role
of elected officials. According to the authors abovementioned, the extent of emergency planning-
as well as the focus of such planning – often is dictated as much by the availability of
intergovernmental transfers by local hazards and vulnerability assessments. Cox (2012: 1932)
pointed out that disaster preparedness have to be analysed along with alternative plans and
According to Gaillard and Mercer (2012:101), Disaster Risk Reduction policies are often
crafted at the national level and eventually implemented at lower levels by local government
institutions which are only tasked to relay actions from the top down. On the contrary, Gerber
and Robinson (2009:358) suggest that vertical and horizontal coordination are both essential in
14
disaster preparedness which is about building routine contacts, mutual information exchanges
and mutual operational efforts as opposed to compliance and frequent one-way information
flows. According to the HFA Guidance and Indicator Package (2008:13), effective preparedness
requires close coordination and information exchange among active organizations including
internally (within their own Ministries or Departments) and externally (with other stakeholders).
An effective coordination system will promote two-way information sharing between different
Moreover, Gaillard and Mercer (2012:96) asserts that a technical know-how adapted to
local wise practices could greatly enhance Disaster Risk Reduction strategies. Community-based
DRR fosters the participation of vulnerable communities in both the evaluation of risk and in ways
to reduce it. It empowers communities with self-developed and culturally, socially and
economically acceptable ways of coping with natural hazards (2012:97). Taken from UNISDR
(2011), the authors somehow agree with the notion that disasters reflects social injustice and
poor governance which prevail in most affected countries (2012:99). Herein, “it is the local
government that plays the most active role in emergency preparedness” since disasters are local
in nature (Wolensky & Wolensky, 1990:703). Governance here goes beyond the sole
democratization and free election process, decentralization and people’s consultation, it refers to
the large relationships within the state and the people, or the ideology, values and authority
imposed on the latter, the distribution of power within the society, and the level of priority given
to DRR (Gaillard & Mercer, 2012:99). It may further imply that governance encompasses the role
of stakeholders and international organizations whose policies or actions may hinder or facilitate
access to resources at the local level. Being at the frontline of preparedness, local government
and communities should perform their role for having a more prepared citizenry and government.
Skill coordination among the wide range of potential stakeholders that may provide assistance
15
during an emergency is critical to avoid confusion and to facilitate an effective response (HFA
Guidance and Indicator Package, 2008:13). In assessing for the overall preparedness of the
community, the researchers will rely on the abovementioned requirements together with the
presence of an effective and timely preparedness plan and the participation of local constituents.
The assessment of the Civil Society in Balangkayan, Eastern Samar rest in accordance to
the objectives as indicated in the NDRRMP. These objectives focus on the increased level of
awareness and enhanced capacity of the community to the threats and impacts of all hazards,
skills and capabilities of communities to cope with the impact of disasters, increased DRRM and
CCA capacity of local DRRM Councils and offices operations centers at all levels, development and
implementation of comprehensive national and local preparedness policies, plans and systems,
and strengthening of partnership and coordination among all key players and stakeholders
(NDDRMP, 2011: 24). However, Gerber and Robinson (2009:348) argues that:
“…the challenge stems from a difficulty in determining policy outcomes for emergency
preparedness. Successful emergency preparedness may mean that a community suffers
less of a loss than it otherwise would have. The most basic problem is that we can never
observe the loss that otherwise would have been experienced. Any assessment requires
the comparison of the observed losses to the counterfactual losses hypothesized to have
otherwise been likely.”
According to Carcellar, Co and Hipolito (2011:367), national and governments here in the
Philippines are mandated to prepare, budgets for, and implement their climate change and DRRM
action plans. Moreover, Republic Act No 10121 highlights the allocation and use of the 5 per cent
of total local government unit (LGU) budget comprising calamity funds, from merely post-disaster
response to disaster risk management activities such as, but not limited to, pre-disaster
16
and medicines, for post-disaster activities, and for the payment of premiums on calamity
Gaillard and Mercer (2012:99), on the other hand, claims that making DRR integrative in
policy and practice is a much more complicated assignment as a significant number of obstacles
arise on part of the Local Government officials accountable for initiating disaster preparedness.
Miller, Adam and Moore (2013:2) states that a very few people actually take effective steps to
prepare for potential disasters. Moreover, the abovementioned authors asserts that at some
point, there has been a failure in communication between government and the public, such that
many people remain unaware of the importance, the benefits and the methods necessary for
In line with this, an importance of strong coordination and participation of the local
government and the civil society should be realized in order to increase the resilience and disaster
preparedness of a community. People in certain regions of the world who have direct experience
with particular risk situations are likely to have stronger and more accessible attitudes regarding
the consequences of related behavior and form attitudes and perceptions about risk with
relatively higher levels of certainty relevant to potential outcomes (Miller, Adam and Moore,
2013:6). As pointed by Cox (2012:1931-32), emphasizing resilience also changes the kinds of
questions that risk managers pay most attention to; for instance is identifying different disaster
scenarios that might occur, along with alternative plans and courses of action to be followed if
they occur.
The world is changing rapidly and together with development comes the negative effects
of this changing world. In the past few years, people have encountered a number of disasters that
17
eventually took lives and destroyed structures and properties. Consequently, previous studies
have been made with regards to disaster preparedness in order to somehow lessen the damages
experienced by citizens. With the damages and the loss of lives, the government as an entity that
protects its citizens, also made efforts in diminishing these losses through making policies for
disaster preparedness. In the Philippines, the government showed its efforts in preparing for
disasters and addressing environmental issues in the shift from Presidential Decree 1566 towards
Disaster Risk Reduction and Management together with the implementation of R.A. 10121 or The
The national and local governments are mandated to prepare, budget for and implement
their climate change and DRRM action plans (Carcellar et al., 2011:367). However, as cited by
Robert Wolensky and Kenneth Wolensky in their study, the locality being the closest to the
disaster is also the component with the smallest relative resources and with the least access to
resources through its constituency. Because of this, the local government is often forced to
allocate resources such that hazard management is not a high priority (Perry, 1985:5). Without a
sufficient amount of budget or resources in order to prepare for upcoming disasters such as
providing safe evacuation centers, life jackets, medical kits, food and water supplies, etc., laws
and policies for disaster preparedness will be useless unless the local government generate funds
on their own for disaster risk reduction, which on one hand, not usually the case.
The importance of local government as the entity that experiences actual risk was
supported with Daniel Henstra’s study asserting that the local government plays a key role in
emergency management by developing the necessary policies and concrete procedures for
“We concentrate our attention on local government performance on key indicators and
their relevance to potential regionalization because many key functional activities
18
relevant to homeland security fall primarily within the responsibility of local government.
More important, it is precisely those local governments that have initial responsibility for
first response, and, as a result, coordinating their response efforts is the bedrock
mechanism of developing regional capabilities to manage disasters and catastrophes
(2009:347).”
depends in large part on the preparations that a local government has made in advance (Henstra,
2010:238). Furthermore, Dekens asserted that the existence and usefulness of local knowledge
rarely received attention and that the emphasis of most academic work, both nationally and
internationally, has been on the latest, ‘advanced’ geophysical knowledge and technical systems
as the most effective disaster response mechanisms. She also added that the considerable body
of work on local knowledge remained as marginal as many of the people whose knowledge it was
partly due to the enormous technical-social perpectives’ divide and the privilege accorded the
‘expertise’ approach which emphasises formal education and degrees instead of life experience
(2007:3). In a study conducted by Gaillard and Mercer, it was emphasized that in many cases,
effective local strategies continue to be overlooked in favour of scientific knowledge, which is not
argued that despite the fact that the local government directly experiences the effects of
disasters, little attention is given in improving its disaster preparedness locally. Moreover,
vulnerability reduction and disaster management strategies. In addition, they are associated with
a policy trend that values the knowledge and capacities of local people and builds on local
resources, including social capital (Allen, 2006:81). In this case, the local government should
initiate developing locally-based disaster preparedness plans which corresponds to the needs of
the citizens in times of disaster. Moreover, in a study conducted by Paola Albrito, she asserted
that,
19
“…effective local risk governance rests on three pillars: that the oversight for disaster risk
reduction must lie with a local government that has responsibility for planning and
budgeting; that decentralisation of responsibilities to local governments needs to be
accompanied by a decentralisation of capacities and resources; and that disaster risk
reduction can be effective at the local level only when undertaken in collaboration with
disaster-prone households and communities – where emphasis needs to be put on local
government participation in the planning and implementation of disaster risk reduction
activities at the community level (2012:295-296).”
Thus, there is an important link between the local government and the political participation of
the citizens towards disaster preparedness. Studies have also shown the importance of
they argued that improving emergency management on regional basis, which can be defined as
the capacity and capability for coordinated response efforts across broad geographic areas and
across political jurisdictions by multiple governmental actors, was conceptualized as one critical
(2009:346). This puts emphasis on decentralization, a shift of power from the national to the local
level, in improving disaster preparedness. Furthermore, not only centralization of policy priority
setting is seen as potentially problematic, there is also a debate over the particular issue of what
regionalized emergency management would or should look like in practice (Gerber and Robinson,
2009:246). Although studies have shown the need for regionalization or decentralization in
improving disaster preparedness, for some countries such as the Philippines, it is something new
since a legal framework of rules is followed. However, the presence of legal framework for
disaster preparedness is not an assurance of citizens’ safety. Problems can be encountered such
as cited by Robert Wolensky and Kenneth Wolensky (1990) in their study, ineffective planning and
planning procedures (Dynes, et al., 1972; Turner, 1976; Wenger et al., 1980). Additionally, citizens
20
typically look to local government for capabilities that do not synchronize with pre-existing norms
and resources. Officials are then caught in a dilemma between an institutionalized pattern that
encourages only the most basic predisaster planning and heightened expectations when crisis
occurs. It is a dilemma that must be understood in a structural context (Wolensky and Wolensky,
1990:711).
Subsequently, as cited by Drabek (2004), Dynes pointed out that most disaster events
have not been the focus of the research community and that the existing research tradition is
predominately Western, community-based, urban and deals with sudden onset agents from
‘natural’ causes (Dynes, 2004:2). It is on one hand, interesting to conduct disaster studies
contribute in the research community of disaster studies. It is also relevant to conduct studies on
how disaster preparedness is steered in the local government considering factors such as
CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY
RESEARCH DESIGN
Type of Research
This is a qualitative study that aims to analyze and interpret the disaster preparedness of
the municipality of Balangkayan, E. Samar in the case of super typhoon Yolanda. This type of
“…a situated activity that locates the observer in the world. It consists of a set of
interpretive, material practices that make the world visible. These practices transform the
world. They turn the world into a series of representations including field notes,
interviews, conversations, photographs, recordings, and memos to the self. At this level,
qualitative research involves an interpretive, naturalistic approach to the world. This
means that qualitative researches study things in the natural settings, attempting to make
21
sense of, or interpret phenomena in terms of meanings people bring to them (Denzin and
Lincoln, 2011:3).”
This study will focus on collecting data in the field where participants experience the issue or
problem under study, specifically the matters considering the disaster preparedness of the
municipality. As a qualitative research, this study will look into the availability of the disaster
preparedness plan of the locality in the case of super typhoon Yolanda and will utilize a case study
among constituents and local government officials concerned with disaster preparedness in
This type of research study is interpretive such that it also seeks to comprehend the
notion of disaster preparedness plan and its vital importance in local governance. This study will
also test the prerogative of Modern Disaster Theory in highlighting the disaster law as the best
portfolio of rules for dealing with catastrophic risks disregarding other factors such as political
Unit of Analysis
The units of analysis of this study are the actual responses of the local government
officials concerned with the disaster preparedness of Balangkayan, E. Samar and the disaster
preparedness plan of the locality in the case of super typhoon Yolanda. Moreover, the researchers
will focus on households in the poblacion barangays of Balangkayan in conducting the case study.
Eastern Samar, Philippines. It has a total population of 9,046 and a total number of 6,099
registered voters (Philippine Statistics Authority, as of 2010). The income classification of the said
locality is fifth class and it is composed of fifteen barangays, namely, Poblacion 1, Poblacion 2,
22
Poblacion 3, Poblacion 4, Poblacion 5, Cabay, Guinpoliran, Maramag, Balogo, Bangon, Caisawan,
Cantubi, General Malvar, Julag and Magsaysay. Considering the extent of damage in the
municipality, this research will only focus on the town proper with Poblacion 1, Poblacion 2,
SAMPLING SCHEME
scheme for this study. This involves making generalizations or influences on data extracted from
one or more representative or elite participants to the sample from which the participant (s) was
drawn (Onwuegbezie and Leech, 2007:240). This study will also utilize a nested sampling design
which represents sampling strategies that facilitate credible comparisons of two or more
members of the same subgroup, wherein one or more members of the subgroup represent a sub-
Nested sampling designs are most commonly used to select key informants. In fact, key
informants, who are selected from the overall set of research participants, often generate
a significant part of the researcher’s data. Moreover, the voices of key informants often
help the researcher to attain data saturation, theoretical saturation, and/or informational
redundancy (Onwuegbezie and Leech, 2007:247).
23
The collection of data will be through a case study on how the constituents and the local
government officials prepared for typhoon Yolanda. Since this research will use a case study, the
nested sample for each poblacion barangay will be five key informants from the civil society
specifically the head of the family. Furthermore, eleven key informants will be selected from the
local government assigned in the disaster preparedness of the locality, including the barangay
captains of each poblacion barangay. However, since incumbent barangay captains have taken
over their positions on December 2013, it is essential that the researchers will also interview
former barangay captains to be able to gain sufficient data. In addition, former barangay captains
will also be interviewed for the reason that they were still in the position during super typhoon
Yolanda.
24
RESEARCH INSTRUMENT
The researches will utilize a case study in assessing the disaster preparedness of
Balangkayan, Eastern Samar in the case of super typhoon Yolanda. The case study will deal with
the preparations made by the local government officials and the constituents before super
typhoon Yolanda devastated the locality with regards to the community’s disaster preparedness
plan, if any. As a guide, the researchers will utilize the objectives of disaster preparedness in the
METHODOLOGICAL LIMITATION
Being one of the priority areas of the National Disaster Risk Reduction
therefore, the researchers will disregard the other priority areas as mentioned in the
NDRRMP. The researchers will only extend the case study to the local government officials
concerned with disaster preparedness in Balangkayan and selected heads of the family in
respondents for the case study, the researchers will focus on households with respect to
25
Chapter IV
According to the Municipal Officer of the Department of Interior and Local Government,
there was no existing disaster preparedness plan in Balangkayan, Eastern Samar before super
typhoon Yolanda occurred. The schedule of making the disaster preparedness plan was set on
November 2013, however, the time constraints of the immediate occurrence of typhoon Yolanda
Consequently, the Municipal Mayor asserted that there was no formal Disaster
On the other hand, according to the Municipal Officer of the Department of Interior and
Local Government, the Municipal Planning and Development Office claims that they have the plan
in order for them to utilize the five percent Local Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Fund
26
used to support disaster risk management activities. Furthermore, majority of the barangay
captains claim that they have an existing disaster preparedness plan in the municipality.
The actions initiated by the local government is important in addressing problems related
to disaster preparedness. Majority of the local civil society claimed that the local government had
been fully responsible in initiating preparations for super typhoon Yolanda for the reason that
there were no recorded casualty, according to the gathered data. The local government officials
in Balangkayan, Eastern Samar performed different set of activities in preparation for super
typhoon Yolanda.
Balangkayan, Mrs. Mariles G. Montes, stated that there was a memorandum from the national
government instructing the local governments to prepare for the upcoming typhoon.
Oo, to prepare. Within that week. (M. Montes, Personal Interview, April 12, 2014).
[Yes, to prepare. Within that week.]
On November 5, 2013, there was a provincial meeting and Municipal Mayors were not
“Ika-5 nag-meeting ha province tapos mayda advisory nga mayors are not
advised to go outside han ira station kay mayda hadto call time ngadto ha Manila
asya at an iba nga Mayor nagkagikan. Natawagan ko hi mayor nga ayaw…” (M.
Montes, Personal Interview, April 12, 2014. [On the fifth, there was a meeting
held in the province and there was an advisory stating that mayors were not
advised to go outside their stations because there was a call time to go to Manila,
that is why the other mayors left. I called Mayor not to leave…]
Moreover, the Municipal DRRM Officer, Mr. Ventura Rhoel Baris, claimed that the
information about the upcoming super typhoon was channelled from the National Disaster Risk
27
Reduction Management Council to the Provincial Disaster Risk Reduction Management Council,
After the Local Government Unit acquired the information about Super Typhoon Yolanda,
Municipal Mayor Allan Contado called up the Municipal Disaster Risk Reduction Management
Council for a meeting on November 5 and November 6, 2013. The agenda of the meeting focused
on the assigning of tasks for the different committees and the procurement of supplies and all
The aforementioned meeting involved the Municipal Social Welfare and Development
Office, Municipal Planning and Development Office, Municipal Disaster Risk Reduction
and Local Government, Chairman of all the Barangays, Municipal Police, Rural Health Unit and
volunteers from the civil society. However, since there was no existing disaster preparedness plan
Accordingly, the local government was not able to utilize an information plan, however,
they initiated ways for the awareness of the community with regards to the upcoming typhoon
through the help of barangay officials. There were house to house warnings for families located
near the shoreline and a fire truck was used for warning the households located in the upland
28
“Guin-house to house an mga nakada ha shoreline area, guin-palibot an fire truck
ha upland area.” (V.R. Baris, Personal Interview, April 10, 2014) [We went house
to house in the shoreline area, a fire truck roamed around the upland area].
Furthermore, there was no formal communication plan that had been utilized. It was only
limited through calls and text messages to the sitios in the municipality, and also through the use
of megaphones and serene of the fire truck in the poblacion. As one of the informants specified,
there was no written communication plan, but only through the key persons designated to
disseminate the information and to declare the evacuation sites to the local constituents.
“Waray in writing pero mayda hadto ni mayor hadto tas bag-o pa manla hi Mayor
nga nag-assume tapos waray ma nakaptan nga hard copy han daan pero mayda
na niya mga tawo nga key persons.” (M. Montes, Personal Interview, April 12,
2014) [There was no written communication plan but Mayor had one and he was
still new in the office; there was no hard copy of the document handed to us by
the previous administration but he already had certain key persons he can rely
on].
On the other hand, printed materials and pamphlets containing preparatory measures to
be disseminated in order to enhance public awareness for upcoming disasters were not able to
“Ambot mandaw. Di ak hit maaram ha ira kay iba na it nga ahensiya. Kanya-
kanya kami hit trabaho. Kay hi kami more on legislation man it amon.” (Hon. A.
Abunales, Personal Interview, April 11, 2014) [I do not know. I do not know
because another agency is in-charge of it. We have our own jobs. We are more
focused on legislation].
Seminars for conducting drills had been already conducted a long time before the
occurrence of typhoon Yolanda, according to the local government officials. These seminars were
held in cooperation with another town, Llorente, Eastern Samar and in participation of the Armed
Forces of the Philippines (AFP), and also local DILG, Municipal Police, Plan Philippines, DSWD, and
barangay officials.
“Oo, upod han Llorente. Mayda ha plaza an kanan mga sundalo.” (E. Ejada,
Personal Interview, April 10, 2014) [Yes, together with Llorente. There was one
held at the plaza by the armed forces].
29
The Municipal Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (MDRRMC) in
Balangkayan, Eastern Samar is headed by the municipal mayor and its members comprise the
agencies in the LGU, civil society and private sector representative. Before the typhoon, disaster
preparedness was not a priority of the locality as one of the informants stated during the
interview. In fact, there is still no particular office for the MDRRM Officer.
According to another informant, the MDRRMC is now fully functional right after super
“Yup, right now. We have updates on upcoming typhoon, flash floods, forest fires.
Nangyari yan sa atin before.” (Hon. A. Contado, Personal Interview, April 20,
2014). [Yes, right now. We have updates on upcoming typhoon, flash floods,
forest fires. It happened to us before].
However, MDRRMC still lacks expertise when it comes to preparations for disasters.
“So far, medyo aktibo. Before, diri pa gud kay waray expertise.” (V.R. Baris,
Personal Interview, April 10, 2014) [So far, it is quite active. Before, it was not that
active because we lacked expertise.]
With the municipal mayor setting initiatives for disaster preparedness, the local
departments of the Local Government Unit in Balangkayan coordinated with each other. The local
civil society also coordinated through preparing their households for immediate evacuation as
“An na-observe ko ha Balangkayan an mga tawo diri nama makuri nga mag-
evacuate kasi mayda na hira experience han (typhoon) Undang nga talaga
30
madako an tubig. So diri na gud dako an resistance nga mag-evacuate hira.” (M.
Montes, Personal Interview, April 12, 2014) [What I observed in Balangkayan was
that, it was not difficult to instruct people to evacuate because they already
experienced a storm surge during typhoon Undang. That is why there was only a
little resistance for evacuation].
As provided by the gathered data, Balangkayan have a rescue team composed of the
MDRRM Officer, Municipal Police, male members from the Engineering Office, male teachers,
Barangay Tanods and some volunteers from the civil society. There were prepared equipment for
rescue operations like a rubber boat, an ambulance, 10 life jackets, 100 meter rope, a fire truck,
“Ang pinaka-sekreto kung bakit nagin successful ang operations, nandiyan ang
local chief executive, nasa opisina, nag-didirect, nasa gitna ng labanan.” (Hon. A.
Contado, Personal Interview, April 20, 2014) [The secret of the success of our
operations was that there was the local chief executive in office who directs and
in the middle of the fight].
There were also relief goods such as rice, noodles, canned goods and coffee, which were
prepared by the Local Government in Balangkayan. Specifically, the Municipal Social Welfare and
Development Office was in-charge of the re-packaging and distribution of the relief goods.
“Rice, noodles, sardines or canned goods. Alam natin kung ilan ang families ng
Balangkayan because of our updated CBMS.” (Hon. A. Contado, Personal
Interview, April 20, 2014) [Rice, noodles or canned goods. We know about the
number of families that here in Balangkayan because of our updated CBMS
(Community-based Management System].
Subsequently, one distinguishable effort made by the officials was imposing forced
evacuation to the constituents who were trying to refuse to leave their households. Republic Act
if necessary. Later on, the people appreciated that particular effort that protected them from the
disaster.
“We advised them to evacuate but we were sure that we will be hit by typhoon
Yolanda, nag-conduct tayo ng forced evacuation. Our police officers went house
to house including our disaster team and forced them to evacuation centers, our
evacuation centers are located at upland areas. Inayos ang evacuation center,
guin-butngan hin water.” (Hon. A. Contado, Perssonal Interview, April 20, 2014)
31
[We advised them to evacuate but we were sure that we will be hit by typhoon
Yolanda, we conducted forced evacuation. Our police officers went house to
house including our disaster team and forced them to evacuation centers, our
evacuation centers are located at upland areas. We inspected the evacuation
center, and we installed a source of water].
The local government assigned Balangkayan Central Elementary School and Talisay
Elementary School as evacuation centers where people could stay during the occurrence of the
typhoon. In order to assure that these evacuation centers are safe, the local government
coordinated with the teachers to open the rooms, inspect the buildings, to assure the availability
Other preparations made by the local government was consistent monitoring so that the
people may be reminded of what they should prepare especially food, clothing and medicine.
Moreover, the local government also procured diesel for the vehicles to be used, purchased goods
and safe drinking water. There were also clearing operations before the typhoon for the purpose
of cutting the branches of trees which can possibly harm people and can damage houses during
“We stored gas and fuel, two chainsaws para putulin ang mga kahoy para di
makasira, umiikot sa mga barangay, every hour umiikot ang fire truck informing
everybody and consistently advising them to evacuate.” (Hon. A. Contado,
Personal Interview, April 20, 2014) [We stored gas and fuel, two chainsaws to cut
trees that can cause damage, we went around the barangays, every hour the fire
truck went roaming, informing everybody and consistently advising them to
evacuate].
32
VIEWS OF THE CIVIL SOCIETY REGARDING DISASTER PREPAREDNESS
As the primary entity which experiences the direct effects of calamities, the local
government must be able to prepare for upcoming natural disasters to be able to protect its
constituents. In the Philippines, the government showed its efforts in preparing for disasters and
addressing environmental issues in the shift from Presidential Decree 1566 towards Disaster Risk
Reduction and Management together with the implementation of R.A. 10121 or The Philippine
Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act of 2010. The national and local governments are
mandated to prepare, budget for and implement their climate change and DRRM action plans
According to NDRRMP, one objective in order to attain disaster preparedness is that there
should be an increased level of awareness and enhanced capacity of the community to the threats
and impacts of all hazards. Essentially, majority of the key informants asserted that they are aware
that their local government is mandated to prepare, budget for and implement DRRM action
plans. Being aware that the local government is mandated by the national government to prepare,
budget for and implement DRRM action plans, shows that Balangkayanons know that their local
government has the responsibility to protect its constituents and minimize the effects of these
calamities. In addition, majority of the key informants also said that there is an existing DRRM
Council in their locality. Furthermore, majority also said that their DRRM Council is responsible
for initiating preparations for upcoming disasters. According to one informant when asked if their
“Oo, asya ngani waray dinhe namatay ngan nahibang. Malooy la.” (Bgy. 1
resident, Personal interview, April 12, 2014) [Yes, that is why nobody died and no
one was hurt. Thankfully].
33
Moreover, majority of the key informants specified that the information they received from the
local government about typhoon Yolanda a few days before its landfall was all about warnings
that a big typhoon is coming and that they were advised to evacuate as soon as possible. Some of
the key informants answered by saying that they only got information about the said typhoon
from their relatives through texts, through televisions and through listening to radios. This shows
that the information the citizens received from the local government about super typhoon
Yolanda was limited and not all constituents were able to be informed by the local government.
According to the case study conducted, there were no pamphlets or any other written forms
informing the citizens about preparations for upcoming disasters. Majority of the key informants
asserted that they were informed about super typhoon Yolanda by the local government through
bandilyo or going around the town, informing the constituents to evacuate through the use of a
“So far, dinhe an akon la nahibaro-an through bandilyo, waray man hira iba nga
form. Waray man hira information drive for typhoon.” (Bgy. 2 resident, Personal
interview, April 12, 2014) [So far, what I know is that it was through bandilyo,
there were no other forms. They did not have an information drive for the
typhoon].
However, one key informant mentioned about drills being conducted in the municipality,
“May-ada hira sinisiring nga drill. Nag-conduct maat an mga pulis. Ginpapabulig
naman an mga tanod. Pero an nanbulig hat an mga tanod, an barangay officials
han ira pinaka-drill. Kanan earthquake man ngane at ada, diri kanan typhoon nga
drill.” (Bgy. 4 resident, Personal interview, April 10, 2014) [There were drills. It
was conducted by the police officers. Barangay tanods were encouraged to join.
However, barangay tanods and barangay officials joined those drills. It was even
I think for earthquakes and not for typhoons].
This only shows that the local government focused on only one means of informing and educating
the constituents about the preparations for the upcoming typhoon that is through what they call
bandilyo. Furthermore, in conducting drills, not all citizens are informed and it only focuses on
barangay officials. The said key informant was informed about the drill for the reason that her
34
residence is near the municipal plaza where the said drill was conducted. When asked about the
measures that the local government utilized to communicate with the constituents about the said
typhoon, majority of the key informants answered by saying that it was only through bandilyo.
Others said that it was through the barangay officials and it was then disseminated to the people.
Communication to the constituents about preparations for super typhoon Yolanda was also
through what they call bandilyo. Although the local government of Balangkayan, E. Samar only
focused on bandilyos in informing, educating and communicating with the residents about the
preparations for super typhoon Yolanda, majority of the key informants were thankful and
satisfied with the local government’s action on this matter. One key informant asserted that,
“Oo gad. Dako nga pakabulig kay kun waray, may mga hibang kay dako gud at
nga tubig.” (Bgy. 5 resident, Personal interview, April 10, 2014) [Yes, of course. It
was a big help for without that (bandilyo), many could have died because the
water was so high].
This supports the idea that even without a formal and legal plan of how the local government will
inform, educate and communicate with the people for the preparations for upcoming disasters,
the constituents were contented with the efforts of their local government. Furthermore,
cooperation with the government in times of calamities is another factor which affects the
disaster preparedness of a community. It is important that constituents cooperate with the local
government such that it has the responsibility to prepare for disasters and secure its people. In
this sense, without the cooperation of the people, efforts of the government to prepare for such
calamities would be useless. When asked if they cooperated with the local government in
preparing for super typhoon Yolanda, 15 out of 25 key informants answered by saying that they
35
have cooperated with the government through preparing their household and at the same time
“An sistema han pagsugot han gobyerno an gi-uupayi nga pakipagsumpayan han
gobyerno.” (Bgy. 5 resident, Personal interview, April 10, 2014) [The system of
following the government is the best way to cooperate with the government].
Moreover, 10 key informants asserted that they did not cooperate with the government.
“Ha amon waray. Basta kay aram na mait nam dinhe it kahimtang hit
Balangkayan nga sugad hit nga talaga it Balangkayan nakuku-an hit tsunami,
storm surge, asya iton. Kay han dati han 1984, it nga Undang dako dama at nga
bagyo nga inabot dinhe. An Barangay 1 and 3 asya dama at an apektado han
storm surge.” (Bgy. 3 resident, Personal interview, April 12, 2014) [We did not
cooperate since we already know the situation of Balangkayan. Balangkayan is
prone to tsunamis, storm surge. Because in 1984, typhoon Undang was also a
strong typhoon that hit our place. Barangays 1 and 3 were also affected by the
storm surge].
It was not the first time that Balangkayan, Eastern Samar experienced a storm surge. In 1984, it
was also hit by typhoon Undang which also created a storm surge. Because of this experience in
the past, some of the people were already expecting that the sea level would rise just like what
happened in 1984. With the knowledge that the sea level rises in times of strong typhoons, some
citizens who experienced typhoon Undang were already aware of what they should do and where
they should be in cases of strong typhoons. This led to personal efforts in preparing for super
typhoon Yolanda and not much about relying on the government on what to do to prepare.
According to the case study conducted, most citizens tied and covered their appliances and other
things, some carried their appliances to the second floor of their houses and others brought what
they can bring when they evacuated. Most key informants prepared for super typhoon Yolanda
by evacuating to upland areas. Although some of the citizens asserted that evacuation centers
were provided by the local government, majority of the key informants said that there were no
36
“Ha pagkahadto pa, waray gud evacuation centers. Pero atleast may-ada gud
pwede pag-evacuatan.” (Bgy. 5 resident, Personal interview, April 12, 2014) [Even
before, there were really no evacuation centers. But atleast there is a place where
people can evacuate].
According to the data gathered, in the past, there were really no formal evacuation centers for
Balangkayanons in case of strong typhoons. The Balangkayan Central Elementary School and
Talisay Elementary School were considered by the citizens as evacuation centers but it was
through their own efforts since they can see that these places are located in higher grounds.
However, a few key informants asserted that it was mentioned in bandilyos that citizens can
evacuate to the Central Elementary School and Talisay Elementary School. Consequently, majority
of the key informants insisted that Balangkayan Central Elementary School is not a good and safe
“50-50 it ak opinion kay han yana nga bagyo nga Yolanda nakita ko nga diri hiya
sapat nga it tawo dinhi ma-accommodate didto kay susruok. Kay kami ngani,
actually hi ako dida nala ak han may C.R…Mahumok it tuna dida possible nga
mag-soil erosion.” (Bgy. 2 resident, Personal interview, April 10, 2014) [I have a
50-50 opinion because during typhoon Yolanda, I saw that it (Central Elementary
School) wasn’t able to accommodate the residents present because there is little
space. I even actually stayed at the C.R…The soil is soft there and soil erosion is
possible].
“It dida ha elementary diri gud it hiya ura-ura hit kaligtas…It dida ha elementary
kay bukid, landslide. Pareho na mait hit nagpaparik. Maupay naman la kunta kun
mayda hit iba nga gintatayo.” (Bgy. 2 resident, Personal interview, April 12, 2014)
37
[In elementary school, it is not really safe…It is located in a mountain but prone
to landslide. It’s as if the soil is already eroding. It is better if there is another
evacuation center being constructed].
Majority of the key informants specified that Balangkayan Central Elementary School, the
temporary evacuation centers of the residents, is not really a safe place since it is prone to
landslides, the construction is not suitable for strong winds and that it can only accommodate few
people. The other temporary evacuation center, the Talisay Elementary School, was considered
by most key informants as safe since it is located at a higher area and not prone to landslide. In
addition, the key informants said that rescue equipment were provided by the local government
such as life jackets, ambulance, fire truck, ropes and a rubber boat. However, the rubber boat was
not used since it was already damaged. Also, majority of the key informants said that relief goods
were prepared by the local government even before the typhoon occurred. Although majority
said that everybody was able to receive the said relief goods, some were not informed, hence,
they were not able to receive the relief goods. One key informant asserted that one reason why
everybody was not able to receive the said relief goods is that,
“Diri man ubos, political man dida…Maaram ka nama hit mga color-coding.” (Bgy.
2 resident, Personal interview, April 12, 2014) [Not all were able to receive (relief
goods), it was political. You know, color-coding].
According to this statement, giving of relief goods was politicized in the sense that only those in
line with the party received more benefits from distribution of relief goods. Furthermore, the key
informants stated that their local departments coordinated with each other. These local
departments were: DSWD, RHU, MDRRMC, MPDC, Engineering Office, PNP, DILG, DA, and DepEd.
Some answered by saying that they did not know about the coordination among local
departments.
Majority of the key informants asserted that they were satisfied with the measures the
government undertook to prepare for super typhoon Yolanda. Key informants said that,
38
“Kuntento na ga ak dara nga yana la nga pang-gobyernuhan an waray hunong
nga paglinibot-libot nga likas na kamo bisan han una nga bagyo, waray, yana la
at.” (Bgy. 3 resident, Personal interview, April 10, 2014) [I am satisfied since it is
just in this administration that they went around the town to constantly remind
the people to evacuate. Even in typhoons in the past, no one did that. It just
happened now].
“Kuntento. Dara nga informed an molupyo nga mag-evacuate kami salit wara
napinsala han tawo. Wara namatay.” (Bgy. 5 resident, Personal interview, April
12, 2014) [Satisfied. Because the residents were informed to evacuate, no one
was hurt. Nobody died].
On the other hand, despite that the majority of the key informants were satisfied with how the
government prepared for super typhoon Yolanda, majority of key informants from Barangay 2
stated that they were not satisfied with the preparations made by the local government.
“Ambot. Ada kay sinisiring ma it nga color-coding, kunta sugad hiton.” (Bgy. 2
resident, Personal interview, April 12, 2014) [I don’t know. There is what they call
color-coding, like that].
“In my part, kulang in the sense siguro nga kulang hin time ngahin it amon lugar
kulang talaga hin place nga eksakto nga magkakamay-ada evacuation center
urog surrounded gud kami hit water and low area gud it Balangkayan and siguro
kun nagprepare at hira, not enough.” (Bgy. 2 resident, Personal interview, April
12, 2014) [In my part, it lacked in the sense that I think because there was little
time and our place really lacks a location where evacuation centers can be built
especially that we are surrounded with water and Balangkayan is located at a low
area. And I think if they have prepared, it was not enough].
From the data gathered, Barangay 2 residents were mainly dissatisfied with the preparations of
the local government since politicking was involved and there is a lack of evacuation centers for
the residents.
As citizens of the municipality of Balangkayan, E. Samar, the key informants were asked
by the researchers about their suggestions to improve the disaster preparedness of their
municipality. Most key informants suggested that the government must provide evacuation
centers which are safe, not only from typhoons but also from floods and evacuation centers which
39
“…magku-an hin evacuation center nga safe nga lugar nga damo it makak-occupy
ngan diri crowded. Kasi it iskuylahan it usa nga room, kun damo it anak diri
masakto.” (Bgy. 4 resident, Personal interview, April 10, 2014) [There should be
an evacuation center that is a safe place and that can accommodate a number of
people and is not crowded. Because in a school, in one room, a family with many
children would not be accommodated].
“Kailangan it LGU mag-provide hin usa pa nga evacuation center nga safe talaga
nga lugar. Safe diri la hit bagyo pati hit mga baha..” (Bgy. 4 resident, Personal
interview, April 10, 2014) [The LGU should provide another evacuation center
which is safe. Safe not only from typhoons, but also from floods..].
Second, there should be an increased awareness for disaster preparedness from the local
government by conducting Disaster Risk Reduction Management (DRRM) trainings for the
“Ipadayon it nga DRRM, magkamay-ada hit mga seminars. Diri la sugad hit
leaders, pati mga molupyo dapat..” (Bgy. 3 resident, Personal interview, April 10,
2014) [Continue the DRRM, there should be seminars. Not only for leaders, but
also for the residents..].
Third, there should also be public meetings about preparations for upcoming disasters so
that people will cooperate and there should also be regular information drive of concerned offices
“Dapat maghatag hira hin special nga public hearing kun ano it, public meeting
sugad hiton basi magkaka-urusa kun ano it dapat gawin, kun tika-in ka sugad
hiton..” (Bgy. 3 resident, Personal interview, April 10, 2014) [They should conduct
a public hearing or what they call it, public meeting like that, for cooperation on
what should be done, or where you will go..].
“Una para hiton community, regular nga information drive hit concerned nga
offices. Ikaduha, siguro iton cooperation hiton komunidad, it aton local officials..”
(Bgy. 2 resident, Personal interview, April 12, 2014) [First for the community,
regular information drive of the concerned offices. Second, I think the
cooperation of the community with the local officials..].
Fourth, they suggested for hazard maps and signs focusing on all calamities (i.e.
“Magkamay-ada hin hazard map kay didto naman la kita hat hibaro han bagyo
na tapos mga sign board kun hain iton way, kay didto lugod ha baryo mayda,
dinhe lugod ha poblacion waray kita..” (Bgy. 1 resident, Personal interview, April
12, 2014) [There should be a hard map because it was only during the typhoon
40
when we learned and there should be sign boards showing routes, because there
is (sign boards) in barrios unlike here in poblacion..].
Fifth, there should be adequate rescue equipment in times of difficulty of evacuation and
“Dapat mayda equipments nga mahibubulig hit gobyerno hin oras hit gipit nga
panlikas para hit madagmit nga pag-rescue.” (Bgy. 5 resident, Personal interview,
April 12, 2014) [There should be equipments provided by the government in
times of difficulty of evacuation and for immediate rescue operations].
Sixth, relief goods should be distributed one day before the calamity and that everyone
must receive relief goods and not just for a few selected people.
“Halimbawa, labi na hit pagkaon kunta kun mayda relief goods mas advance
bisan la it one day before hiton nga kalamidad, mas maupay siguro.” (Bgy. 2
resident, Personal interview, April 10, 2014) [For example, especially in food, if
there are relief goods, it should be distributed in advance. Even just one day
before that calamity, I think it would be better].
“It mga relief goods kunta gintutuhay it nira, diri may puray-puray la nga
pinananagan suga kunta hit ha am, kinahanglan nam kunta it parte sugad hiton.”
(Bgy. 2 resident, Personal interview, April 12, 2014) [Relief goods should be
properly distributed and not just selecting a few people to be given. Like us, we
also need it].
Seventh, there should be good governance, better plans and there should be sincerity of
the barangay officials in doing their jobs since they are close to the constituents.
“Nasing ma at nga mayda na budget para han seawall ngan unta magkamay-ada
na.’ (Bgy. 3 resident, Personal interview, April 10, 2014) [They said there was
already a budget for the seawall and I really hope that there will be soon].
Ninth, the residents should cooperate by informing each other about preparations for
upcoming calamities and that the residents should not just wait for their local government unit to
take action.
41
“Ngan it komunidad diri la maghinulat hit LGU tapos may-ada dapat disiplina ngan
kaulangan magburublig ngin may-ada mga kalamidad. Mag-inform hit igkasi-tawo
hin may-ada kalamidad para ngatanan prepared.” (Bgy. 4 resident, Personal
interview, April 11, 2014) [The community should not just wait for the LGU and
there should be discipline and cooperation. The people should inform each other
about upcoming typhoons so that everyone will be prepared].
Lastly, there should be active cooperation of the constituents together with the local
government because even if the local government would invest efforts to prepare for upcoming
disasters, but if constituents would not cooperate, these efforts would still be useless. Citizens
should also be disciplined and should evacuate to higher places in times of calamities.
“It cooperation hit mga tawo. Bisan pa ano nga panalingkamot hit gobyerno kun
diri ma-cooperate it mga tawo, waray la gihap gamit. Kinahanglan alisto hit pag-
cooperate, pagbulig hit im kalugaringon. Pagiging disiplinado liwat.” (Bgy. 5
resident, Personal interview, April 10, 2014) [The cooperation of the people.
Efforts of the government will only be useless if the people will not cooperate.
One should be alert in cooperating, also in helping yourself. And also being
disciplined].
CHAPTER V
A. SUMMARY
Balangkayan, Eastern Samar utilizing a case study through nested sampling for each of the
poblacion barangays of the said municipality. The indicators used for this study are: (1) the
availability of a disaster preparedness plan, (2) the activities made by the local government unit
in preparation for super typhoon Yolanda, and (3) the views of the civil society regarding the
disaster preparedness of their locality. This case study focused on the information and views of
42
the 36 key informants with 25 key informants from the civil society, and 11 key informants from
the local government which include the five barangay captains of the poblacion barangays.
On the other hand, some officials provided limited answers to the questions pertaining to
the content of the disaster preparedness plan of Balangkayan, Eastern Samar for the reason that
the disaster plan had not been handed by the previous administration. This shows the lack of
coordination between the former and the present administration and the officers in particular.
Subsequently, there was no disaster preparedness plan available at the time the researchers
conducted this case study. Moreover, the incumbent barangay chairman in Barangay 3 was not
yet elected in the position during the event of super typhoon Yolanda. In line with this, the
researchers were required to interview the former barangay chairman in Barangay 3 about the
disaster preparedness of Balangkayan, Eastern Samar for the purpose of gathering ample data.
The study found that there is no existing disaster preparedness plan in the municipality
of Balangkayan, Eastern Samar notwithstanding the mandate from the national government to
prepare and implement DRRM action plans. However, there were no recorded casualties in the
said municipality during super typhoon Yolanda. Informal preparation plans were utilized such as
the so-called bandilyo or going around the town to inform and communicate with the people with
regards to the upcoming typhoon. There were also clearing operations before the typhoon and
although not everyone were able to receive relief goods, the local government provided relief
goods before the typhoon. Rescue equipment were also provided such as a 100-meter rope, 10
life jackets, an ambulance, a fire truck, flashlights and life rings. Furthermore, majority of the key
informants were satisfied with the preparations made by their local government.
Moreover, suggestions were gathered from the key informants with regards to the
improvement of the disaster preparedness of their municipality. These suggestions include the
provision of evacuation centers which are safe, not only from typhoons but also from floods and
43
evacuation centers which can accommodate the residents. Second, the conduction of Disaster
Risk Reduction Management (DRRM) trainings for the residents and not only for government
leaders for an increased awareness for disaster preparedness from the local government. Third,
the conduction of public meetings about preparations for upcoming disasters and a regular
information drive of concerned offices and cooperation between the local government and the
community. Fourth, the creation of hazard maps and signs focusing on all calamities (i.e.
earthquake, fires, etc.). Fifth, the provision of adequate rescue equipment in times of difficulty of
evacuation and for immediate rescue operations. Sixth, the distribution of relief goods for
everyone a day before the calamity. Seventh, the existence of good governance and plans for
cooperation. Eighth, a budget allocation for the development of the seawall. Ninth, the
responsibility and cooperation among residents and between the local government and the
constituents. Lastly, an improved discipline and an active cooperation of the constituents with the
local government.
B. CONCLUSION
The results of the study have provided answers to the objectives which focused on the
availability of the disaster plan, the activities of the Local Government Officials in Balangkayan,
Eastern Samar in preparation for super typhoon Yolanda and the views of the local Civil Society
with regards to the preparedness of the said municipality in the case of super typhoon Yolanda.
The study incited interest due to the fact that, in the absence of a formal or written
disaster plan, the actions concerning disaster preparedness has been successfully executed in the
municipality of Balangkayan, Eastern Samar. In line with this, the researchers ascertained that
some factors were therefore considerable with regards to this gap. On the other hand, the lack of
a disaster plan reveals a cause for a malfunction of the system as a whole since it is imperative for
44
local governments to formulate a document, specifically the disaster plan that would contain
methods for preparations in the event of a disaster. A disaster plan would provide the best set of
according to the Modern Disaster Theory. However, it cannot be justified as in the case of the
municipality of Balangkayan, Eastern Samar and other communities lacking disaster plans that
have recorded no casualty and have still directed good results as in the case of preparedness.
Although the study indicated popular satisfaction among the local constituents with regards to
the preparations made by the local government, the results do not warrant the latter to withdraw
the formulation of a disaster plan. Without a disaster plan that the local government would
adhere to, this shows us that the participation of the constituents played a big role in preparation
for super typhoon Yolanda vis-à-vis the preparations executed by the local government. As one
of the indicators of good governance, participation is exactly essential since the accomplishment
of the duties and responsibilities of the local government would deeply depend the local on the
participation of local constituents. In this study, local civil society’s participation with the local
government officials was exemplified in the constituents’ acts of preparing their own households
and later proceeding to the evacuation centers, considering the consistent announcement of the
information about the upcoming super typhoon and even during the implementation of forced
typhoons and storm surges have contributed to the ease of persuasion on the part of the local
officials concerning the evacuation of the residents. Furthermore, the study revealed that due to
these previous experiences on disasters particularly typhoons, the local civil society have
characterized a sense of resilience in the case of the super typhoon Yolanda. Even with the
nonexistence of a disaster plan, local constituents were able to create their own preparatory
45
measures on the basis of their past typhoon experiences and they were also able to consider the
vulnerability of the location of their municipality. Thus, casualties were not recorded even though
C. RECOMMENDATIONS
For purpose of future studies regarding disaster preparedness, the following should be
considered:
1. Local levels experience the direct effects of disasters. It is therefore highly recommended
that future studies regarding disaster preparedness be conducted at local levels in order
2. This study looked into the disaster preparedness on the local level. Nevertheless, future
implementation of R.A No. 10121 (Philippine Disaster Risk Reduction and Management
Act of 2010), specifically on disaster preparedness, from the national, provincial and local
level.
3. Future studies may also focus on the formulation and execution of the disaster
4. Other researchers may conduct comparisons among localities with respect to the disaster
5. Since this study focused on only one priority area of the National Disaster Risk Reduction
46
Inasmuch as this study looked into the disaster preparedness of the municipality of
Balangkayan, E. Samar, the researches recommend the following in order to further improve
recommended that the national government should monitor the implementation of R.A.
10121 from the national, provincial and into the local level considering that Philippines is
2. It is also recommended that all local governments must create disaster preparedness
plans that would be suitable to the location and situation of the area, having the NDRRMP
as a guide.
government would declare their activities concerning disaster preparedness such as the
preparation of relief goods and the designated evacuation sites for the local constituents.
4. The local government should provide safe evacuation centers that can accommodate the
5. It is also recommended that the expertise of the members of the Local DRRM Council be
enhanced for the purpose of improving their activities with regards to preparations for
disasters.
6. The researchers suggest that there should be seminars and trainings conducting drills on
disaster preparedness in the community that would involve local officials and
7. According to the data gathered, Balangkayan, E. Samar is prone to storm surge. Early
warning systems such as the bandilyo and relocation of houses located near the shoreline
are recommended.
47
8. Pamphlets containing preparatory measures and hazard maps must be provided in every
48
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Albrito, Paola. Making Cities Resilient: Increasing Resilience to Disasters at the Local Level. Journal
of Business Community and Emergency Planning Vol. 5, No. 4, 2012.
Allen, Katrina. Community-based disaster preparedness and climate adaptation: local capacity-
building in the Philippines. USA: Blackwell Publishing, 2006.
BBC News. November 22, 2013. “Typhoon Haiyan death toll rises over 5,000”
Retrieved May 21, 2014 from <http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-25051606>
Burchill, Scott, Andrew Linklater, Richard Devetak, Jack Donnelly, Matthew Paterson, Christian
Reus Smith and Jacqui True. Theories of International Relations. New York: Palgrave
Macmillan, 2005.
Carcellar, Norberto, Jason Christopher Rayos Co and Zarina Hipolito. Addressing Disaster Risk
Reduction through Community-rooted interventions in the Philippines: experience of the
Homeless People’s Federation of the Philippines. Sage Publication, 2011.
Chen, Jim. Modern Disaster Theory: Evaluating Disaster Law as a Portfolio of Legal Rules. Emory
of International Law, Volume 25, 2011.
Cox, Louis Anthony, Jr. Community Resilience and Decision Theory Challenges for Catastrophic
Events. Risk Analysis, Vol. 32, No. 11, 2012.
Dekens, Julie. Local Knowledge for Disaster Preparedness. Kathmandu, Nepal: International
Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, 2007.
Denzin, Norman K. and Yvonna S. Lincoln. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. SAGE
Publications, Inc., 2011.
Gaillard, J.C. and Jessica Mercer. From Knowledge to Action: Bridging gaps in Disaster Risk
Reduction. Sage Publication, 2012.
Gerber, Brian and Scott E. Robinson. Local Government Performance and the Challenges of
Regional Preparedness for disasters. Public Performance and Management Review, Vol.
32, No. 3. M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2009.
GMA News. November 12, 2013. “No casualties, but 400 homes lost in Balangkayan, Eastern
Samar” Retrieved May 21, 2014 from
<http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/335122/news/regions/no-casualties-but-
400-homes-lost-in-balangkayan-eastern-samar>
Haimes, Yacov. System Based Approach to Preparedness for, Response to, and Recovery from
Natural and Human-made Disasters. Leadership and Management Engineering, 2012.
Miller, Claude, Bradley Adame, and Scott Moore. Vested Interest Theory and Disaster
Preparedness. USA: Blackwell Publishing, 2013.
National Geographic Daily News. 2013. “Super Typhoon Haiyan Headed Towards Philippines”
Retrieved May 21, 2014 from
<http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/13/131106-supertyphoon-haiyan-
yolanda-philippines/>
Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. and Nancy L. Leech. Sampling Designs in Qualitative Research: Making
the Sampling Process More Public. Vol. 12, No. 2 of The Qualitative Report. 2007.
Somers, Scott and James H. Svara. Assessing and Manging Environmental Risk: Connecting Local
Government Management with Emergency Management. City of Mesa, Arizona, n.d.
Sunstar Publishing. December 1, 2013. “Typhoon Yolanda death toll at 5,632; damage at P30.8B”
Retrieved May 21, 2014 from <http://www.sunstar.com.ph/breaking-
news/2013/12/01/typhoon-yolanda-death-toll-5632-damage-p308b-316527>
Wolensky, Robert and Kenneth C. Wolensky. Local Government’s Problem with Disaster
Management: A Literature Review and Structural Analysis. Policy Studies Review, Vol. 9,
No. 4, 1990.
DAMAGED TO AGRICULTURE
SWINE,POULTRY : 12.5 M
COCONUT (1750 hcs. ) : 66 M
RICE (550 hcs.) : 4.5 M
ROOTCROPS (150 hcs.) : 12 M
DAMAGES TO GOVERNMENT EST. COST (PHP)
INFRASTRUCTURES / UTILITIES
POWER (STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM) : 2.5 M
WATER : 8 M
COMMUNICATION (ICT EQUIPMENTS) : 2.5 M
OFFICE FIXTURES & EQUIPMENTS : 3 M
FOOD TERMINAL BUILDING : 2 M
HEALTH CENTER : 2M
MUNICIPAL HALL : 2 M
SCHOOL BUILDINGS : 1.0 M
SPORTS & RECREATION CENTER : 1.5 M
PARKS & RESORT : 5 M
BARANGAY HALLS : 4.0 M
ROADS : 12 M
APPENDIX 2
We are very interested in acquiring your response about your preparations in relation to
super typhoon Yolanda. The first part will be your demographic profile and the second part will
focus on a case study among local government officials concerned with the disaster preparedness
plan in your community. Please note: This case study is strictly confidential and will only be used
A. Name : _____________________________________
B. Age : _____________________________________
D. Barangay : _____________________________________
E. Occupation/Position: _____________________________________
Part II. CASE STUDY
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
4. Is there a memorandum coming from the national government regarding the upcoming
typhoon?
________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
plans, etc.) did you modify to improve your existing disaster preparedness plan?
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
If no, what were the reasons of not reviewing the existing disaster preparedness
plan?
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
6. How many times did the local government meet to review the said plan?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
8. Did the local government utilize an information plan for the awareness of the community
________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
If no, what did the local government did to foster the awareness of the
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
9. Did the local government utilize a communication plan before the typhoon?
________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
If no, what did the local government do to foster communication with the
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
10. Did the local government hold a seminar for conducting drills for response in relation to
________________________________________________________________________
If yes,
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
11. Did you distribute pamphlets regarding preparedness for effective response during
calamities?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
community?
________________________________________________________________________
15. Did all the local departments coordinate with regards to preparations for the expected
disaster?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
If yes, what were these departments?
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
If no, what steps were undertaken in order to foster local coordination in the
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
17. Did you organize a rescue team for the upcoming calamity?
________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
19. Did you prepare for a sufficient supply of relief goods that will be distributed to all
residents?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
20. Did you assign a particular department to facilitate the evacuation of people located in
________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
22. What other preparations did you undertake with regards to super typhoon Yolanda?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Thank You!
A CASE STUDY ON THE PREPAREDNESS PHASE OF THE DISASTER PLAN IN THE MUNICIPALITY
OF BALANGKAYAN, EASTERN SAMAR: THE CASE OF SUPERTYPHOON YOLANDA
(Civil Society)
We are very interested in acquiring your response about your preparations in relation to
super typhoon Yolanda. The first part will be your demographic profile and the second part will
focus on your actual preparatory behavior with regards to super typhoon Yolanda. Please note:
This interview is strictly confidential and will only be used for research purposes.
2. Age : _____________________________________
4. Barangay : _____________________________________
5. Occupation : _____________________________________
1. Are you aware that local governments are mandated to prepare, budget for and
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
3. Are they fully responsible in initiating for preparations for upcoming disasters?
________________________________________________________________________
4. What information from the local government did you receive about typhoon Yolanda a
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
5. Did they distribute pamphlets or other written materials on how to prepare for upcoming
disasters?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
6. What steps did the local government undertake to inform and educate the citizens for
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
7. What measures did the local government utilized to communicate with the constituents
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
8. Were these efforts able to help you prepare for the said typhoon?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
9. Did you actually cooperate with your local government? Why or why not?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
10. Upon knowing about the upcoming calamity, what steps did you undertake in order to
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
11. Did your family evacuate?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
14. From your point of view, are those evacuation centers safe?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
17. Did the local government prepare relief goods that will be distributed to the citizens after
the typhoon?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
18. Did you actually receive relief goods from the local government?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
19. Did everyone received those relief goods?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
20. What do you think are the reasons why all or not all constituents received the said aid
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
21. From what you know, did local departments coordinate with each other?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
23. Were you satisfied with the measures that the government undertook?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
24. As a citizen, what are your suggestions to improve the disaster preparedness of your
community?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Thank You!
APPENDIX 4
Interesado kami nga mahibaru-an an iyo pagkita o opinyon kaparte han pangandaman
han Balangkayan, E. Samar han naglabay nga Bagyo Yolanda. Alayon pagbaton han mga masunod
nga pakiana. An mga impormasyon nga makukuha hini nga case study in pribado ngan para la ha
pag-istudyo.
4. May ada ba memorandum nga iyo nakarawat tikang ha national government hi-unong
han Bagyo Yolanda?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
5. Ginkita ba ngahaw han iyo lokal nga gobyerno an iyo disaster plan han ti-arabot an bagyo
Yolanda?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Kun oo, ano nga mga butang an iyo ginbag-o para pa-upayon pa an iyo disaster
preparedness plan?
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
Kun diri, ano an mga rason nga waray na niyo kulawi ngahaw an iyo disaster
preparedness plan?
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
7. Hin-o an mga bulig han pagbag-o han iyo disaster preparedness plan?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
8. Naghimo ba kamo hin plano han pagpahibaro han mga tawo hi-unong han Bagyo
Yolanda?
________________________________________________________________________
Kun oo, pinaagi hin ano an iyo pagpasabot han mga mulopyo hi-unong han Bagyo
Yolanda?
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
Kun waray, ano man an iyo ginbuhat parte han pagpahibaro han mga tawo?
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
9. May-ada ba kamo communication plan?
________________________________________________________________________
Kun may-ada, pinaagi hin ano an iyo pakig-himangraw han mga tawo mahi-unong
han Bagyo Yolanda?
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
Kun waray, ano an iyo ginbuhat han pakig-himangraw han mga tawo mahi-unong
han Bagyo Yolanda?
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
10. May-ada ba seminar nga may-ada drills an lokal nga gobyerno para han pagresponde han
ti-arabot nga bagyo?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Kun may-ada,
Hin-o an nanguna han seminar?
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
Pira nga mga mulopyo an nag-training?
___________________________________________________________
11. Nanhatag ba kamo hin pamphlets o iba pa nga sinurat hi-unong han pag-andam para han
epektibo nga pagresponde han kalamidad?
________________________________________________________________________
12. May-ada ba kamo yana lokal nga DRRM Council dinhe ha iyo bungto?
________________________________________________________________________
Kun mayda, hira hin-o an bulig hine nga lokal nga DRRM Council?
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
Kun waray, kay ano nga waray niyo lokal nga DRRM Council?
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Kun oo, padayon ha sunod nga paki-ana.
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
14. May ada ba nangunguna nga mga tawo dinhe ha iyo komunidad hini nga pag-andam para
hit mga kalamidad?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
15. Nagigibulig-bulig ba it iyo mga lokal nga departamento (pananglitan it DepEd, DILG ngan
iba pa) para mag-andam para hit ti-arabot nga kalamidad?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
16. Nakipagsumpayan ba an mga mulopyo han lokal nga gobyerno?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
Kun waray, ano an iyo ginbuhat para magibulig-bulig an mga tawo han iyo
komunidad para han pangandaman han bagyo Yolanda?
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
17. May-ada ba kamo rescue team para han pangandaman han bagyo Yolanda?
________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
19. Nag-andam ba kamo hin eksakto nga suplay hin relief goods nga ipanhahatag han mga
mulopyo?
________________________________________________________________________
Kun oo, ano ine nga mga relief goods nga iyo gin-andam?
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
20. Nag-assign ba kamo hin partikular nga departamento nga mangunguna han pagbalhin
ngadto han evacuation centers han mga mulopyo nga naukoy han mga delikado nga
lokasyon?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
21. Ano an iyo ginbuhat para masiguro nga libre o ligtas ini nga mga evacuation center/s?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
22. Ano pa an iba nga mga preparasyon an iyo ginbuhat parte han pangandaman han bagyo
Yolanda?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Interesado kami nga mahibaru-an an iyo pagkita o opinyon kaparte han pangandaman
han Balangkayan, E. Samar han naglabay nga Bagyo Yolanda. Alayon pagbaton han mga masunod
nga pakiana. An mga impormasyon nga makukuha hini nga case study in pribado ngan para la ha
pag-istudyo.
4. Ano nga mga impormasyon mahi-unong han bagyo Yolanda antis ine umabot an iyo
nahibaru-an tikang han lokal nga gobyerno?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
5. Nanhatag ba an lokal nga gobyerno hin pamphlets o iba pa nga mga sinurat hi-unong han
pag-andam para han ti-arabot nga kalamidad?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
6. Ano an mga ginbuhat han lokal nga gobyerno para magpahibaro ngan ma-edukar an mga
mulopyo han ti-arabot nga bagyo?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
7. Ano an ginbuhat han lokal nga gobyerno para makipag-himangraw han mga mulopyo hi-
unong han bagyo Yolanda?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
8. Nakabulig ba ine nga mga panalinguha para kamo makapag-andam han bagyo Yolanda?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
9. Nakipagsumpayan ba kamo han iyo lokal nga gobyerno parte han pag-andam han ti-
arabot nga bagyo? Kay ano oo? Kay ano waray?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
10. Han iyo hibaro nga may-ada ti-abot nga kalamidad, ano an iyo ginbuhat para maandam
an iyo panimalay?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
11. Nag-evacuate ba an iyo pamilya?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
15. Nagpatigayon ba an lokal nga gobyerno hin mga kagamitan para han rescue operations?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
16. Ano ini nga mga kagamitan para han rescue operations?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
17. Nag-andam ba an iyo lokal nga gobyerno hin relief goods nga ipanhahatag han mga
mulopyo kahuman han bagyo Yolanda?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
18. Nakakarawat ba kamo hin relief goods tikang han iyo lokal nga gobyerno?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
19. Ngatanan ba nga mulopyo nakakarawat hin relief goods?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
20. Ha imo pagkita, ano an mga rason kun kay ano ngatanan o diri ngatanan nakakarawat
hini nga bulig tikang han lokal nga gobyerno?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
21. Ha imo pakasabot, nagburublig ba an mga lokal nga departamento ha iyo bungto parte
han pangandaman han bagyo Yolanda?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
23. Kuntento ba kamo han pag-aksyon han iyo lokal nga gobyerno parte han pangandaman
para han bagyo Yolanda? Kay ano?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
24. Komo usa nga mulopyo han iyo bungto, ano it iyo mga suhestiyon para mapa-upay pa
an pangandaman han iyo komunidad para hit mga posible nga ti-arabot pa nga mga
kalamidad?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Interesado kami nga mahibaru-an an iyo pagkita o opinyon kaparte han pangandaman
han Balangkayan, E. Samar han naglabay nga Bagyo Yolanda. Alayon pagbaton han mga masunod
nga pakiana. An mga impormasyon nga makukuha hini nga case study in pribado ngan para la ha
pag-istudyo.
4. May ada ba memorandum nga iyo nakarawat tikang ha national government hi-unong
han Bagyo Yolanda?
Actually, formally wala. In written memorandum wala, pero may warning through
DILG.___________________________________________________________________
5. Ginkita ba ngahaw han iyo lokal nga gobyerno an iyo disaster plan han ti-arabot an bagyo
Yolanda?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Kun oo, ano nga mga butang an iyo ginbag-o para pa-upayon pa an iyo disaster
preparedness plan?
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
Kun diri, ano an mga rason nga waray na niyo kulawi ngahaw an iyo disaster
preparedness plan?
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
7. Hin-o an mga bulig han pagbag-o han iyo disaster preparedness plan?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
8. Naghimo ba kamo hin plano han pagpahibaro han mga tawo hi-unong han Bagyo
Yolanda?
_Oo.____________________________________________________________________
Kun oo, pinaagi hin ano an iyo pagpasabot han mga mulopyo hi-unong han Bagyo
Yolanda?
Personally, pinupuntahan ang bawat barangay through Barangay Captains and
public warnings, the firetruck. The Disaster Team went house to house to warn
them and wait for updates and possible evacuation
action.____________________________________________________________
Kun waray, ano man an iyo ginbuhat parte han pagpahibaro han mga tawo?
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
Kun waray, ano an iyo ginbuhat han pakig-himangraw han mga tawo mahi-unong
han Bagyo Yolanda?
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
10. May-ada ba seminar nga may-ada drills an lokal nga gobyerno para han pagresponde han
ti-arabot nga bagyo?
_Before me, siguro.________________________________________________________
Kun may-ada,
Hin-o an nanguna han seminar?
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
12. May-ada ba kamo yana lokal nga DRRM Council dinhe ha iyo bungto?
_Oo.____________________________________________________________________
Kun mayda, hira hin-o an bulig hine nga lokal nga DRRM Council?
Headed by the Mayor, Vice-Chair and MDRRMO, DepEd, PNP, Engineering,
Municipal Planning and Development Office - MPDC, Civil Society and Department
of Agriculture.______________________________________________________
Kun waray, kay ano nga waray niyo lokal nga DRRM Council?
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
14. May ada ba nangunguna nga mga tawo dinhe ha iyo komunidad hini nga pag-andam para
hit mga kalamidad?
_Oo.____________________________________________________________________
15. Nagigibulig-bulig ba it iyo mga lokal nga departamento para mag-andam para hit ti-arabot
nga kalamidad?
_Oo.____________________________________________________________________
Kun waray, ano an iyo ginbuhat para magibulig-bulig an mga tawo han iyo
komunidad para han pangandaman han bagyo Yolanda?
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
17. May-ada ba kamo rescue team para han pangandaman han bagyo Yolanda?
_Yes.____________________________________________________________________
19. Nag-andam ba kamo hin eksakto nga suplay hin relief goods nga ipanhahatag han mga
mulopyo?
_Oo.____________________________________________________________________
Kun oo, ano ine nga mga relief goods nga iyo gin-andam?
_Rice, noodles, sardines or canned goods. Alam natin kung ilan ang families,
population ng Balangkayan because of our updated CBMS.__________________
20. Nag-assign ba kamo hin partikular nga departamento nga mangunguna han pagbalhin
ngadto han evacuation centers han mga mulopyo nga naukoy han mga delikado nga
lokasyon?
_Yes.____________________________________________________________________
22. Ano pa an iba nga mga preparasyon an iyo ginbuhat parte han pangandaman han bagyo
Yolanda?
We stored gas and fuel, two chainsaws para putulin ang mga kahoy para di makasira,
umiikot sa barangay, every hour umiikot ang firetruck informing everybody and
consistently advising them to evacuate. Nakailaw ang firetruck, ang purpose niya para
malaman ng mga tawo kung saan ang pwedeng puntahan at may ilaw ang highway. Ang
dapat tanggalin, tanggalin na, mga kahoy, structure, packing of relief goods, directing all
concerned – Health, PNP, Engineering and Agriculture, to be at the command center which
is the municipal building right before the typhoon. Personal and public information or
announcement for evacuations. Ang pinaka-sikreto kung bakit naging successful ang
operations, nandyan ang local chief executive, nasa opisina, nagda-direct, nasa gitna ng
labanan. Kung wala ako dito, iba ang mangyayari nun. Hindi na kinonsider ang
terminologies – storm surge, semantics because of the past experiences ng mga tao, nag-
momove out to evacuation centers. Because of the preparedness, nagging madali ang
clearing operations. We prepared two generators before the typhoon, three days after
inayos ang mga wires at nagkaroon ng street lights. Ang emphasis ng instructions from
the Mayor of the seriousness of the danger, many times. We are planning to include
barangays in trainings including local heads. What made Balangkayan different in terms
of preparedness, people have taken by heart the seriousness of the typhoon, nagburublig
an mga tawo. Foresight an LGU kun ano an mangyayari ngan monitoring and calculating
the strength of the typhoon. Because of our preparedness naka-clearing after the typhoon,
first day nakapanhatag nah an relief goods.____________________________________
Interesado kami nga mahibaru-an an iyo pagkita o opinyon kaparte han pangandaman
han Balangkayan, E. Samar han naglabay nga Bagyo Yolanda. Alayon pagbaton han mga masunod
nga pakiana. An mga impormasyon nga makukuha hini nga case study in pribado ngan para la ha
pag-istudyo.
4. May ada ba memorandum nga iyo nakarawat tikang ha national government hi-unong
han Bagyo Yolanda?
_Oo.____________________________________________________________________
5. Ginkita ba ngahaw han iyo lokal nga gobyerno an iyo disaster plan han ti-arabot an bagyo
Yolanda?
Waray. Nagplano hira hin bag-o, hi Mayor. ________________________________
Kun oo, ano nga mga butang an iyo ginbag-o para pa-upayon pa an iyo disaster
preparedness plan?
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
Kun diri, ano an mga rason nga waray na niyo kulawi ngahaw an iyo disaster
preparedness plan?
Kay waray man nakakaptan tapos nag-consult hiya han MDRRM oFficer, DSWD,
MPDO, ginpa-prepare niya tanan nga vehicles ngan gasoline. Bag-o pala at hi
Rhuel. Some time han September an iya designation._______________________
7. Hin-o an mga bulig han pagbag-o han iyo disaster preparedness plan?
MSWDO, MPDO, MDRRMKO and all other head of offices, DA, Liga President, an iba nga
mga Kapitan. Not all present pero majority._____________________________________
8. Naghimo ba kamo hin plano han pagpahibaro han mga tawo hi-unong han Bagyo
Yolanda?
Oo, hi Mayor.____________________________________________________________
Kun oo, pinaagi hin ano an iyo pagpasabot han mga mulopyo hi-unong han Bagyo
Yolanda?
Through han Punong Barangays, nga magku-an hira hit tagsa-tagsa nga mga
barangays tapos dida han bungto I think nagpaku-an hi Mayor, nagpabandilyo at
ada, an firetruck, may siren.___________________________________________
Kun waray, ano man an iyo ginbuhat parte han pagpahibaro han mga tawo?
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
Kun waray, ano an iyo ginbuhat han pakig-himangraw han mga tawo mahi-unong
han Bagyo Yolanda?
Bag-o pa manla hi Mayor nga nag-assume tapos waray ma nakaptan nga hard
copy han daan pero mayda na niya mga tawo nga key persons. Siren, tapos gin-
house to house talaga, urog an nakada ha coastal ginhouse to house, forced
evacuation talaga gin-implement han day before han bagyo. Tapos ginpa-prepare
nga daan an mga evacuation centers, one in Talisay, usa didi ha elementary.
Diretso gindeclare nga mga evacuation center.____________________________
10. May-ada ba seminar nga may-ada drills an lokal nga gobyerno para han pagresponde han
ti-arabot nga bagyo?
I believe so pero waray pa ak dida, ngatraining ngani at hira ha Baybay, Leyte. It masasyod
hit ngada, an dati nga nakada._______________________________________________
Kun may-ada,
Hin-o an nanguna han seminar?
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
11. Nanhatag ba kamo hin pamphlets o iba pa nga sinurat hi-unong han pag-andam para han
epektibo nga pagresponde han kalamidad?
Waray.__________________________________________________________________
12. May-ada ba kamo yana lokal nga DRRM Council dinhe ha iyo bungto?
Yes.____________________________________________________________________
Kun mayda, hira hin-o an bulig hine nga lokal nga DRRM Council?
All Head of Offices, MDRRMO, all Punong Barangays, MHO, MSWDO, MAO, PNP,
DILG, DAR, basta inter-agency._________________________________________
Kun waray, kay ano nga waray niyo lokal nga DRRM Council?
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
14. May ada ba nangunguna nga mga tawo dinhe ha iyo komunidad hini nga pag-andam para
hit mga kalamidad?
Yana mayda na MDRRMO. An barangays masayon na hira ma-touch tikang na han
Yolanda kay han una mga bungol at.__________________________________________
15. Nagigibulig-bulig ba it iyo mga lokal nga para mag-andam para hit ti-arabot nga
kalamidad?
Yes. _________________________________________________________________
Kun waray, ano an iyo ginbuhat para magibulig-bulig an mga tawo han iyo
komunidad para han pangandaman han bagyo Yolanda?
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
17. May-ada ba kamo rescue team para han pangandaman han bagyo Yolanda?
Yes.____________________________________________________________________
19. Nag-andam ba kamo hin eksakto nga suplay hin relief goods nga ipanhahatag han mga
mulopyo?
Yes. Nakipag-coordinate hi Mayor ha NFA han before han bagyo.___________________
Kun oo, ano ine nga mga relief goods nga iyo gin-andam?
Rice, noodles ngahin canned goods.____________________________________
20. Nag-assign ba kamo hin partikular nga departamento nga mangunguna han pagbalhin
ngadto han evacuation centers han mga mulopyo nga naukoy han mga delikado nga
lokasyon?
Oo._____________________________________________________________________
22. Ano pa an iba nga mga preparasyon an iyo ginbuhat parte han pangandaman han bagyo
Yolanda?
Nagpinantawag manla ak hat kan Mayor, tapos monitoring kay ha opisina busy kami hat
kay Secretary Roxas will be coming. Ku-an la at mga advisory forwarded ngadto han mga
office, mga kapitan nga may cellphone about han bagyo.__________________________
Interesado kami nga mahibaru-an an iyo pagkita o opinyon kaparte han pangandaman
han Balangkayan, E. Samar han naglabay nga Bagyo Yolanda. Alayon pagbaton han mga masunod
nga pakiana. An mga impormasyon nga makukuha hini nga case study in pribado ngan para la ha
pag-istudyo.
4. May ada ba memorandum nga iyo nakarawat tikang ha national government hi-unong
han Bagyo Yolanda?
Ginchannel from NDRRMC to PDRRMC tapos ha MDRRMC.________________________
Kun oo, ano an iyo siyahan nga ginbuhat?
Diretso an Mayor nag-conduct hin meeting upod an DSWD, MPDC, Engineering
Office, DepEd (Elementary and High School), RHU tapos all agencies.__________
5. Ginkita ba ngahaw han iyo lokal nga gobyerno an iyo disaster plan han ti-arabot an bagyo
Yolanda?
Waray na hit nam hiya._____________________________________________________
Kun oo, ano nga mga butang an iyo ginbag-o para pa-upayon pa an iyo disaster
preparedness plan?
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
Kun diri, ano an mga rason nga waray na niyo kulawi ngahaw an iyo disaster
preparedness plan?
Kinikita la namon an hinanabo. Mga Monday siguro adto (November 4)._______
7. Hin-o an mga bulig han pagbag-o han iyo disaster preparedness plan?
MSWDO, MPDO, MDRRMKO and all other head of offices, DA, Liga President, an iba nga
mga Kapitan. Not all present pero majority._____________________________________
8. Naghimo ba kamo hin plano han pagpahibaro han mga tawo hi-unong han Bagyo
Yolanda?
Yes._____________________________________________________________________
Kun oo, pinaagi hin ano an iyo pagpasabot han mga mulopyo hi-unong han Bagyo
Yolanda?
House to house, an mga nakada han shoreline area, ginpalibot an firetruck, nga
ha upland area._____________________________________________________
Kun waray, ano man an iyo ginbuhat parte han pagpahibaro han mga tawo?
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
Kun may-ada, pinaagi hin ano an iyo pakig-himangraw han mga tawo mahi-unong
han Bagyo Yolanda?
House to house campaign, gin-announcement han public.___________________
Kun waray, ano an iyo ginbuhat han pakig-himangraw han mga tawo mahi-unong
han Bagyo Yolanda?
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
10. May-ada ba seminar nga may-ada drills an lokal nga gobyerno para han pagresponde han
ti-arabot nga bagyo?
Waray pa._______________________________________________________________
Kun may-ada,
Hin-o an nanguna han seminar?
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
Pira nga mga mulopyo an nag-training?
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
11. Nanhatag ba kamo hin pamphlets o iba pa nga sinurat hi-unong han pag-andam para han
epektibo nga pagresponde han kalamidad?
Waray.__________________________________________________________________
12. May-ada ba kamo yana lokal nga DRRM Council dinhe ha iyo bungto?
Mayda existing___________________________________________________________
Kun mayda, hira hin-o an bulig hine nga lokal nga DRRM Council?
Mayor, SB Member, Head of Offices sugad ha DepEd. Kulang la han NGO.______
Kun waray, kay ano nga waray niyo lokal nga DRRM Council?
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
14. May ada ba nangunguna nga mga tawo dinhe ha iyo komunidad hini nga pag-andam para
hit mga kalamidad?
An LGU__________________________________________________________________
15. Nagigibulig-bulig ba it iyo mga lokal nga para mag-andam para hit ti-arabot nga
kalamidad?
Oo. _________________________________________________________________
17. May-ada ba kamo rescue team para han pangandaman han bagyo Yolanda?
Zero. Mayda mga volunteers nga naglugaring hin pagbulig.________________________
19. Nag-andam ba kamo hin eksakto nga suplay hin relief goods nga ipanhahatag han mga
mulopyo?
Oo._____________________________________________________________________
Kun oo, ano ine nga mga relief goods nga iyo gin-andam?
Before han Martes han katapos han meeting, nagpa-purchase hin rice, canned
goods, etc.________________________________________________________
20. Nag-assign ba kamo hin partikular nga departamento nga mangunguna han pagbalhin
ngadto han evacuation centers han mga mulopyo nga naukoy han mga delikado nga
lokasyon?
Yes._____________________________________________________________________
21. Ano an iyo ginbuhat para masiguro nga libre o ligtas ini nga mga evacuation center/s?
Ginsecure la anay namon kun durable apisar han dako nga bagyo. An elevated nga lugar.
Dida han contingenc plan, Talisay ngan Central Elementary an nakabutang.___________
22. Ano pa an iba nga mga preparasyon an iyo ginbuhat parte han pangandaman han bagyo
Yolanda?
Una, clearing operations gamit an chainsaw, pamutol hin kahoy para bias kunta mabari
diri hiya makakahibang. Sunod an suplay han tubig, may mga container ngadto han
evacuation center. An electricity, urog pa kay wraty generator although an DILG mayda
generator, an kan doktora an am nagamit han gab-i. Tapos an forced evacuation.______
DAMO NGA SALAMAT!
A CASE STUDY ON THE DISASTER PREPAREDNESS
OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BALANGKAYAN, EASTERN SAMAR:
THE CASE OF SUPERTYPHOON YOLANDA
(Civil Society)
Informant No. __09__
Interesado kami nga mahibaru-an an iyo pagkita o opinyon kaparte han pangandaman
han Balangkayan, E. Samar han naglabay nga Bagyo Yolanda. Alayon pagbaton han mga masunod
nga pakiana. An mga impormasyon nga makukuha hini nga case study in pribado ngan para la ha
pag-istudyo.
3. Responsable ba hira han pangunguna han pagpreparar para han ti-arabot nga mga
kalamidad?
Oo. Nagkakamay-ada hit orientation._________________________________________
4. Ano nga mga impormasyon mahi-unong han bagyo Yolanda antis ine umabot an iyo
nahibaru-an tikang han lokal nga gobyerno?
An kakusog han hangin, an dalagan. Wara na-foresee nga sugad kahitaas an tubig. Pero
aware na it it mga taw okay time and again, nadako it it tubig dinhe. An mangroves ngane
ginrevive na at han typhoon Undang. May constant request nga kailangan an mulopyo
lumikas. Naayop na kami hit higher grounds kay maaram naman kami. An yana unaware
kay in form han tsunami. Educated na an tawo. Nagsugot hira diretso an Barangay 1 ngan
3. Sumala han history, first time nga naagusan an am location hin tubig._____________
5. Nanhatag ba an lokal nga gobyerno hin pamphlets o iba pa nga mga sinurat hi-unong han
pag-andam para han ti-arabot nga kalamidad?
Waray ak hit paka-kuan nga nanhatag hira. May-ada la constant encouragement han
mga tawo. And our Mayor didn’t leave the town. Waray gud hiya iwas dinhe ha
Balangkayan._____________________________________________________________
6. Ano an mga ginbuhat han lokal nga gobyerno para magpahibaro ngan ma-edukar an mga
mulopyo han ti-arabot nga bagyo?
Pinaagi han announcement, loudspeaker, sige an libot ngan nag-manhinpatigayon an
mga tawo._______________________________________________________________
7. Ano an ginbuhat han lokal nga gobyerno para makipag-himangraw han mga mulopyo hi-
unong han bagyo Yolanda?
Ambot kun nagpasarang hira hin pamphlets. Wara ak paka-kuan kun mayda hat
ipinanhatag._____________________________________________________________
8. Nakabulig ba ine nga mga panalinguha para kamo makapag-andam han bagyo Yolanda?
Para ha akon, nakabulig adto kay naglisto hira. There was less damage, wray gud naku-
an nga kinabuhi han tawo. An ira an ginpinanlikay pati an mga gamit._______________
9. Nakipagsumpayan ba kamo han iyo lokal nga gobyerno parte han pag-andam han ti-
arabot nga bagyo? Kay ano oo? Kay ano waray?
An sistema han pagsugot han gobyerno an gi-uupayi nga pakipag-sumpayan han
gobyerno.___________________________________________________________
10. Han iyo hibaro nga may-ada ti-abot nga kalamidad, ano an iyo ginbuhat para maandam
an iyo panimalay?
Ginsirahan an balay, pinanahuban an mga gamit ngan ginga-od hin pisi an mga gamit.
15. Nagpatigayon ba an lokal nga gobyerno hin mga kagamitan para han rescue operations?
Oo._____________________________________________________________________
16. Ano ini nga mga kagamitan para han rescue operations?
May-ada lifeboats tikang pa han daan. May ada hit dida lifeboat.___________________
17. Nag-andam ba an iyo lokal nga gobyerno hin relief goods nga ipanhahatag han mga
mulopyo kahuman han bagyo Yolanda?
May ada.________________________________________________________________
18. Nakakarawat ba kamo hin relief goods tikang han iyo lokal nga gobyerno?
Oo._____________________________________________________________________
20. Ha imo pagkita, ano an mga rason kun kay ano ngatanan o diri ngatanan nakakarawat
hini nga bulig tikang han lokal nga gobyerno?
Ngatanan nanginginahanglan. Immediate nga pagbulig ka na-distroso an mga tanom.
21. Ha imo pakasabot, nagburublig ba an mga lokal nga departamento ha iyo bungto parte
han pangandaman han bagyo Yolanda?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
23. Kuntento ba kamo han pag-aksyon han iyo lokal nga gobyerno parte han pangandaman
para han bagyo Yolanda? Kay ano?
Kuntento ak. Kay sugad hit am edad, mga senior citizen na kami. Kuntento a khan mga
bulig ha am. May ada na relocation nga gin-andam kun maruyag an mga tawo.______
24. Komo usa nga mulopyo han iyo bungto, ano it iyo mga suhestiyon para mapa-upay pa
an pangandaman han iyo komunidad para hit mga posible nga ti-arabot pa nga mga
kalamidad?
It cooperation hit mga tawo. Bisan pa ano nga panalingkamot hit gobyerno kun diri ma-
cooperate it mga tawo, waray la gihap gamit. Kinahanglan alisto hit pag-cooperate,
pagbulig hit im kalugaringon. Pagiging disiplinado liwat.__________________________
Interesado kami nga mahibaru-an an iyo pagkita o opinyon kaparte han pangandaman
han Balangkayan, E. Samar han naglabay nga Bagyo Yolanda. Alayon pagbaton han mga masunod
nga pakiana. An mga impormasyon nga makukuha hini nga case study in pribado ngan para la ha
pag-istudyo.
3. Responsable ba hira han pangunguna han pagpreparar para han ti-arabot nga mga
kalamidad?
So far oo. Okay gad hira. Han hadto ngane nga Tuesday pala nag-meeting na at._______
4. Ano nga mga impormasyon mahi-unong han bagyo Yolanda antis ine umabot an iyo
nahibaru-an tikang han lokal nga gobyerno?
Nga ine nga ti-abot nga bagyo in super typhoon ngan 10-15 meters high. Pero diri storm
surge an ira siring, madako talaga an balod.____________________________________
5. Nanhatag ba an lokal nga gobyerno hin pamphlets o iba pa nga mga sinurat hi-unong han
pag-andam para han ti-arabot nga kalamidad?
Wara. An ira ginamit usa nga truck nga naglilibot, nagsusumat nga mag-force evacuation
na._____________________________________________________________________
6. Ano an mga ginbuhat han lokal nga gobyerno para magpahibaro ngan ma-edukar an mga
mulopyo han ti-arabot nga bagyo?
Gin-disseminate by barangay, ginpalibot an mga pulis nga kaulangan mag-evacuate an
tawo.___________________________________________________________________
7. Ano an ginbuhat han lokal nga gobyerno para makipag-himangraw han mga mulopyo hi-
unong han bagyo Yolanda?
Nakipag-meeting han leaders/heads. An mga barangay captains na an nag-disseminate
han mga tawo.____________________________________________________________
8. Nakabulig ba ine nga mga panalinguha para kamo makapag-andam han bagyo Yolanda?
Oo._____________________________________________________________________
9. Nakipagsumpayan ba kamo han iyo lokal nga gobyerno parte han pag-andam han ti-
arabot nga bagyo? Kay ano oo? Kay ano waray?
Oo. Linikas kami.__________________________________________________________
10. Han iyo hibaro nga may-ada ti-abot nga kalamidad, ano an iyo ginbuhat para maandam
an iyo panimalay?
Ginpanhigot an appliances, ginku-an an panapton nga diri manhipalid. Maaram man
kami nga dati nadako talaga an tubig.______________________________________
11. Nag-evacuate ba an iyo pamilya?
Oo._____________________________________________________________________
15. Nagpatigayon ba an lokal nga gobyerno hin mga kagamitan para han rescue operations?
Oo._____________________________________________________________________
16. Ano ini nga mga kagamitan para han rescue operations?
So far an ak kinita la, lubid, an rubber boat nga wara higamiti kay nahuyos.___________
17. Nag-andam ba an iyo lokal nga gobyerno hin relief goods nga ipanhahatag han mga
mulopyo kahuman han bagyo Yolanda?
Oo nag-andam, kay han Tuesday or Wednesday, nagpinanmutos na at hira.__________
18. Nakakarawat ba kamo hin relief goods tikang han iyo lokal nga gobyerno?
Oo, mostly pagkaon, rice ngahin canned goods._________________________________
21. Ha imo pakasabot, nagburublig ba an mga lokal nga departamento ha iyo bungto parte
han pangandaman han bagyo Yolanda?
Nagburublig, although mayda pipira nga waray._________________________________
23. Kuntento ba kamo han pag-aksyon han iyo lokal nga gobyerno parte han pangandaman
para han bagyo Yolanda? Kay ano?
Oo, kay gin-warningan talaga nira an mga tawo ngan nag-provide hin mga awto para
pag-evacuate.___________________________________________________________
24. Komo usa nga mulopyo han iyo bungto, ano it iyo mga suhestiyon para mapa-upay pa
an pangandaman han iyo komunidad para hit mga posible nga ti-arabot pa nga mga
kalamidad?
Kailangan an facilities andam, flashlights, generator. Kay di ngane andam damo it
nahinanabo nga diri maupay. Para liwat nga aware an mga tawo hit nahinanabo dinhe
hit bagyo.________________________________________________________________
Interesado kami nga mahibaru-an an iyo pagkita o opinyon kaparte han pangandaman
han Balangkayan, E. Samar han naglabay nga Bagyo Yolanda. Alayon pagbaton han mga masunod
nga pakiana. An mga impormasyon nga makukuha hini nga case study in pribado ngan para la ha
pag-istudyo.
3. Responsable ba hira han pangunguna han pagpreparar para han ti-arabot nga mga
kalamidad?
Diri ak piho, wara ko pa ma hit nakaka-istorya didto ha ira pero nakabati la ak hit._____
4. Ano nga mga impormasyon mahi-unong han bagyo Yolanda antis ine umabot an iyo
nahibaru-an tikang han lokal nga gobyerno?
Damo, Telebisyon, national information han kanan weather, PAG-ASA. Naglibot-libot an
mga pulis pag-anunsyo nga mayda ti-abot nga bagyo. An ak mga anak tinawag tikang ha
Manila nasiring nga tidatong an bagyo an gikukusogi han ngatanan nga bagyo._______
5. Nanhatag ba an lokal nga gobyerno hin pamphlets o iba pa nga mga sinurat hi-unong han
pag-andam para han ti-arabot nga kalamidad?
Waray panhatag pero sige an anunsyo han mga pulis naglibot, nag-anunsyo through
megaphone, nagpapasabot, nabulig pag-evacuate ngadto han lugar.________________
6. Ano an mga ginbuhat han lokal nga gobyerno para magpahibaro ngan ma-edukar an mga
mulopyo han ti-arabot nga bagyo?
Sige it ira mga pahinumdom, temprano nga antis umabot pumalagiw ngan mag-
evacuate.________________________________________________________________
7. Ano an ginbuhat han lokal nga gobyerno para makipag-himangraw han mga mulopyo hi-
unong han bagyo Yolanda?
Hit Barangay 3 nahibaro ak, nagpapahibaro, nad-aadvise nga panimos-timos han bagyo
nga dako.________________________________________________________________
8. Nakabulig ba ine nga mga panalinguha para kamo makapag-andam han bagyo Yolanda?
Oo kay it ak obserbasyon, waray casualty.______________________________________
9. Nakipagsumpayan ba kamo han iyo lokal nga gobyerno parte han pag-andam han ti-
arabot nga bagyo? Kay ano oo? Kay ano waray?
Oo kay bisan an ak mga ka-urupdan sige an ak pag-advise nga magkalagiw kamo
habang maaga pa. Urog an mga barangay officials, nag-inform gihap.__________
10. Han iyo hibaro nga may-ada ti-abot nga kalamidad, ano an iyo ginbuhat para maandam
an iyo panimalay?
Nanimos, an am mga kagamitan isinaka nam, an mabubuhat isinaka. Takay nagkahulos
manla gihap kay an am atop natanggal, ginruba an bubong. Dako an am damage._____
15. Nagpatigayon ba an lokal nga gobyerno hin mga kagamitan para han rescue operations?
May-ada.________________________________________________________________
16. Ano ini nga mga kagamitan para han rescue operations?
Dump truck, mga tricycle nga masasakyan, idudul-ong ka ngadto sugad ha elementary,
ha Talisay.______________________________________________________________
17. Nag-andam ba an iyo lokal nga gobyerno hin relief goods nga ipanhahatag han mga
mulopyo kahuman han bagyo Yolanda?
Han antis, waray. Han ku-an lugod, han sige an bagyo nakabati ak nga ha munisipyo
nagpipinamutos ha hin relief pero waray kami pakakarawat. Niyan na kami__________
pakakarawat 4 days after, kay bisan ngani an luna, wray nam atop, nangutang kami hin
kinse pieces nga yero. Diri man kami inililista kay kanan mga wash-out manla kuno an
ira tinatagan hin priority. An makabuburong kay mayda man natagan nga diri washed
out. May discrimination gihap.______________________________________________
18. Nakakarawat ba kamo hin relief goods tikang han iyo lokal nga gobyerno?
Waray__________________________________________________________________
20. Ha imo pagkita, ano an mga rason kun kay ano ngatanan o diri ngatanan nakakarawat
hini nga bulig tikang han lokal nga gobyerno?
Kunta pag kinabuwasan dapat mayda na pero an makabuburong kay waray ipanhatag.
21. Ha imo pakasabot, nagburublig ba an mga lokal nga departamento ha iyo bungto parte
han pangandaman han bagyo Yolanda?
Waray ko hit inabat._______________________________________________________
23. Kuntento ba kamo han pag-aksyon han iyo lokal nga gobyerno parte han pangandaman
para han bagyo Yolanda? Kay ano?
Okay kay mayda kami mga impormasyon maagap pa. Nakapag-andam kami,_________
nakapanimos.____________________________________________________________
24. Komo usa nga mulopyo han iyo bungto, ano it iyo mga suhestiyon para mapa-upay pa
an pangandaman han iyo komunidad para hit mga posible nga ti-arabot pa nga mga
kalamidad?
Evacuation center nga mayda atop, may ada CR. Kun mahihimo ngani kinahanlan mayda
binubutngan hin medisina, may ada katurugan, sofa o papag. Kun mayda relocation,
mala-om gud la kami hit gobyerno. It MDRRMC manginginano, matambulig hit mga
angay buliga, may ada mga rubber boats, Kay it dinhe nga lugar, tabing-dagat. Nasusulod
gud hit dagat didi hit may Calico-an ngan hit may tulay takay hin monbon la dinhe guti-
ay la hiya nga kahubasan. Kinahanglan may mga rubber boats ngan mga gamit pagsalbar
hit mga nalulumos.________________________________________________________
PHOTO DOCUMENTATION
The researchers together with Municipal Mayor Allan Contado after signing the approval of the
letter of request for conducting the study in Balangkayan, E. Samar
The researchers together with MDRRM Officer Mr. Ventura Rhoel Baris after the interview
The researchers interviewing the Municipal Officer of DILG, Mrs. Mariles G. Montes
The researchers interviewing Mrs. Nelly Cherreguine, a resident of Barangay 04, Poblacion
The researchers interviewing Mr. Emerio Caspe, a resident of Barangay 01, Poblacion
The researchers interviewing Mr. Telesforo Canales, a resident of Barangay 03, Poblacion