B R I E F R E P O R T
G
uidelines recommend accumulating Family Study (SHFS), a population with a The primary measure of physical ac-
10,000 steps per day as part of a high prevalence of obesity, low physical ac- tivity used was the average steps per day
healthy lifestyle (1,2). However, it tivity levels, and a high burden of diabetes. during the time the pedometer was worn.
is not known whether participating in Generalized estimating equations (GEE)
more modest levels of activity is associated RESEARCH DESIGN AND with an independence working correla-
with a lower risk of diabetes in a high-risk, METHODSdThe SHFS is a population- tion structure and robust standard errors
relatively inactive population. The purpose based longitudinal study of cardiovascular were used to examine the association of
of this study was to assess the relationship disease in 13 AI communities in Arizona, pedometer-determined steps per day with
of pedometer-determined steps per day with North Dakota, South Dakota, and Oklahoma. the risk of diabetes. Statistical analyses
incident diabetes among American Indians Details of the study design have been de- were conducted using STATA version 9.0
(AIs) who participated in the Strong Heart scribed previously (3). (Stata, College Station, TX).
We computed the odds ratio and 95%
c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c CI for developing diabetes using GEE.
From the 1Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; the 2MedStar Health
Odds ratios (95% CI) were calculated
Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia; the 3Georgetown and Howard Universities Center for using participants in the lowest quartile of
Translational Science, Washington, District of Columbia; the 4Department of Biostatistics, University steps per day as the referent group, after
of Washington, Seattle, Washington; the 5Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pitts- adjusting for confounding factors.
burgh, Pennsylvania; and the 6Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, Cardiovascular Health
Research Unit, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Corresponding author: Amanda M. Fretts, amfretts@u.washington.edu. RESULTSdThe study population in-
Received 30 November 2011 and accepted 1 April 2012. cluded 1,149 (62.9%) women, and the
DOI: 10.2337/dc11-2321 median age at baseline examination was
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the 37.6 years (range 18.7–74.9). The median
Indian Health Service.
© 2012 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly BMI was 32.0 kg/m2 (16.6–68.7). There
cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/ were 178 (9.7%) participants with predi-
licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details. abetes at baseline.
Table 1dOdds ratio (95% CI) of type 2 diabetes according to steps per day
Mean steps per day decreased with three steps-per-day quartiles. Participants during follow-up), reported odds ratios
age, and men had higher step counts than who took at least 3,500 steps/day had a may not accurately estimate hazard ratios.
women. The median steps per day for 29% lower odds of developing diabetes The results of this study demonstrate
participants aged ,55 years were 6,696 for compared with more sedentary participants. that physical activity of 3,500 or greater
men and 4,770 for women. Among par- We assessed previously the relation- steps per day is associated with a lower
ticipants aged $55 years, median steps ship of self-reported participation in risk of incident diabetes, compared with
per day were 5,513 for men and 3,452 moderate-to-high intensity leisure-time lower levels of activity; above 3,500 steps/
for women. Moreover, in this population or occupational activities on the incidence day, more was not better than less activity.
without major morbidity, physical inac- of diabetes among middle-aged or older This study identifies physical inactivity as
tivity was common in all age groups. Ap- AIs. In the earlier report, when compared an important factor related to diabetes
proximately 26% of participants aged with less active participants, those who and suggests the need for physical activity
,30 accumulated ,3,500 steps/day, reported any moderate-to-high intensity education and outreach programs that
25% of participants aged 30–49 years ac- leisure-time or occupational activity had a target inactive individuals, particularly
cumulated fewer than 3,500 steps/day, 33% lower odds of incident diabetes (9), AIs who have epidemic rates of obesity,
and 35% of participants aged 50+ accu- and there was no evidence that more ac- physical inactivity, and type 2 diabetes.
mulated ,3,500 steps/day. tivity was better than less activity. Thus,
During follow-up, diabetes developed both studies support a benefit associated
in 243 participants. Compared with indi- with participation in modest levels of AcknowledgmentsdThis study was supported
viduals in the lowest quartile of steps per physical activity on risk of diabetes in an by the I-T32-HL07902 grant and cooperative
agreement grants U01-HL41642, U01-HL41652,
day, the odds ratio for diabetes among inactive population. UL01-HL41654, U01-HL65520, and U01-
those in the steps per day category “3,500– Several studies suggest that individu- HL65521 from the National Heart, Lung, and
5,399 steps/day” was 0.76 (95% CI 0.53– als who accumulate 10,000 steps per day Blood Institute (Bethesda, MD).
1.11), after adjustment for confounders. have a decreased risk of obesity and better No potential conflicts of interest relevant to
Likewise, the odds ratios comparing glucose tolerance compared with individ- this article were reported.
“5,400–7,799 steps/day” and “7,800+ uals who accumulate fewer steps (1,10–13). This work comprises the contribution of
steps/day” with those who accumulated However, health benefits do not appear nine authors. A.M.F. was responsible for de-
“,3,500 steps/day” were 0.74 (0.49– to be limited to only the most active indi- veloping the research question of interest and
1.13) and 0.77 (0.51–1.16), respectively. viduals; certain health benefits may be performing the literature review and data anal-
These data are most consistent with a achieved by adding as little as 2,500 steps ysis for the project, as well as writing the man-
uscript. B.V.H. and D.S.S. were the senior
threshold effect within the first quartile per day to baseline activity (1,11,13,14). investigators on the project. They supervised
of steps per day. Contrasting the three up- Our analyses complement such findings all activities and aided in all aspects of the
per quartiles with the lowest quartile, the and indicate that even modest amounts of project, including development of the research
odds ratio for diabetes after adjustment activity are associated with lower odds of question and writing the manuscript. G.E.D.
for confounders was 0.71 (0.51–0.98). developing diabetes. and S.A.A.B. participated in all analyses and
Adjustment for BMI attenuated the odds Observed odds ratios were attenuated writing of the manuscript. B.M. was the bio-
ratios (Table 1). after additional adjustment for baseline statistician on the project and supervised the
BMI. This attenuation may be because of statistical methods of the manuscript as well as
CONCLUSIONSdThe results from confounding by the independent effects of reviewed all drafts of the manuscript. A.M.K.
this analysis in an obese and relatively obesity on physical activity and diabetes and K.L.S. were involved in the implemen-
tation of the pedometers used in the study and
inactive population indicate that modest risk or because of the role of obesity as reviewed and edited all drafts of the manu-
amounts of objectively measured steps per a mediator. Unfortunately, we cannot differ- script. D.C. reviewed and edited all drafts of the
day are associated with a lower odds of entiate between potential confounding and manuscript and helped write the RESULTS and
developing diabetes. The odds ratios for mediation by BMI in this analysis. Addi- CONCLUSIONS sections of the manuscript. A.M.F.
the association of physical activity with tionally, because diabetes in this cohort is is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had
diabetes were similar among the upper not rare (13% of cohort developed diabetes full access to all the data in the study and takes
responsibility for the integrity of the data and 5. Schneider PL, Crouter SE, Lukajic O, tolerance in overweight women. Prev Med
the accuracy of the data analysis. Bassett DR Jr. Accuracy and reliability of 2003;37:356–362
The authors acknowledge the assistance and 10 pedometers for measuring steps over a 11. Sugiura H, Sugiura H, Kajima K, Mirbod
cooperation of the participating tribes, the In- 400-m walk. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; SM, Iwata H, Matsuoka T. Effects of
dian Health Service hospitals and clinics at each 35:1779–1784 long-term moderate exercise and in-
center, and the SHS/SHFS staff. 6. Bassett DR Jr, Ainsworth BE, Leggett SR, crease in number of daily steps on serum
et al. Accuracy of five electronic pedom- lipids in women: radomized controlled
eters for measuring distance walked. trial. BMC Womens Health 2002;2:
References Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996;28:1071– 3–10
1. Tudor-Locke C, Bassett DR Jr. How many 1077 12. Tudor-Locke C, Ainsworth BE, Whitt MC,
steps/day are enough? Preliminary pedometer 7. Tudor-Locke C, Ainsworth BE, Thompson Thompson RW, Addy CL, Jones DA. The
indices for public health. Sports Med 2004; RW, Matthews CE. Comparison of pe- relationship between pedometer-determined
34:1–8 dometer and accelerometer measures of ambulatory activity and body composition
2. Tudor-Locke C, et al. How Many Steps/ free-living physical activity. Med Sci Sports variables. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord
day are Enough? For Adults. Int J Behav Exerc 2002;34:2045–2051 2001;25:1571–1578
Nutr Phys Act 2011;8:79 8. Storti KL, Arena VC, Barmada MM, et al. 13. Moreau KL, Degarmo R, Langley J, et al.
3. North KE, Howard BV, Welty TK, et al. Physical activity levels in American-Indian Increasing daily walking lowers blood
Genetic and environmental contributions adults: the Strong Heart Family Study. Am pressure in postmenopausal women. Med
to cardiovascular disease risk in American J Prev Med 2009;37:481–487 Sci Sports Exerc 2001;33:1825–1831
Indians: the strong heart family study. Am 9. Fretts AM, Howard BV, Kriska AM, et al. 14. Tudor-Locke CE, Myers AM, Bell RC,
J Epidemiol 2003;157:303–314 Physical activity and incident diabetes Harris SB, Wilson Rodger N. Preliminary
4. Marsh AP, Vance RM, Frederick TL, in American Indians: the Strong Heart outcome evaluation of the First Step
Hesselmann SA, Rejeski WJ. Objective as- Study. Am J Epidemiol 2009;170:632– Program: a daily physical activity inter-
sessment of activity in older adults at risk 639 vention for individuals with type 2 di-
for mobility disability. Med Sci Sports 10. Swartz A, Strath S, Bassett D, et al. In- abetes. Patient Educ Couns 2002;47:
Exerc 2007;39:1020–1026 creasing daily walking improves glucose 23–28