A Thesis Presented
to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Education
Philippine Christian University
Taft Avenue, Manila
In partial fulfillment
of the requirements for the
degree of Master of Arts in Education
Major in Educational Administration
By:
CANARY B. VIERNES
December 2018
ii
APPROVAL SHEET
PANEL OF EXAMINERS
Administration.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
assistance and moral support that lead to the realization of this endeavor:
Affairs, Dean Graduate School of Education and member of the panel, for
University, for his incredible ideas, guidance, efforts, time, suggestions, and
encouragement;
inspiring advice;
Engr. Joe-Mar B. Bicera Jr. and Engr. Jazer Mike Ramos, for
study;
Above all, to the Almighty God for the strength, health and wisdom
-CBV
v
vi
DEDICATION
My father,
My mother,
My brother,
My special someone,
My pupils,
-CBV
vii
ABSTRACT
No. of Pages: 75
The profile variables delimited the fifty-eight (58) pupils in the grade
scores of the experimental and control groups which led to the rejection of
null hypothesis.
viii
posttest scores of the experimental group which led to the rejection of null
hypothesis.
different from that of the control group; which suggests the homogeneity of
This means that the use of blended learning in teaching the subject has
control and experimental group, which suggests that although the two
the pupils; Teachers should work hand in hand in order to further enhance
and create activities suited for the pupils which will eventually translate to a
better learning; Teachers should continue providing activities which are very
Create a classroom atmosphere that will build and boost pupils’ confidence;
tasks. They should utilize technology to make excited, more engaged and
should not be too hard or too easy so that pupils will not disengage.
The results led to the development of the exemplar lesson plan.
These lesson plans will be a guide to teachers which they can be used in
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PRELIMINARIES Page
Title Page…………………………………………………… i
Approval Sheet.……………………………………………. ii
Acknowledgement.………………………………………… iii
Dedication …………………………………………………. v
x
Thesis Abstract....…………………………………………. vi
Table of Contents.…………………………………………. ix
A. Introduction……………………………….………………………. 1
B. Statement of the Purpose…………………………….…………. 3
C. Significant of the Study………………………………….………. 4
D. Scope and limitations………………………………….…………. 5
A. Theoretical Framework…………………………………………... 7
B. Synthesis…………………………………………………………... 21
C. Conceptual Framework…………………...……………………… 22
E. Hypothesis…………………………………………………………. 23
F. Definitions of Terms….…………….……………………………… 23
A. Results…………………………………………….……………...... 30
B. Discussion………………………………………...…………….…. 35
A. Summary………………………………………………….………. 54
B. Conclusion………………………….……………………….……. 58
C. Recommendation……………………….………………………… 59
BIBLIOGRAPHY
A. Book Sources…………………………………………………. 61
B. Magazines and Journals……………………………………… 62
C. Internet…………………………………………………………. 63
APPENDICES
A. Appendix A-Questionnaire………………………….…………. 64
B. Appendix B- Learning Gains…………………………...……… 73
C. Appendix C-Letter to the Principal……………………………. 74
CURRICULUM VITAE………………………….…………………. 75
xii
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGURES
Research Paradigm…….……………………………………… 53
1
Chapter 1
THE PROBLEMS AND ITS BACKGROUND
seeing the spark – the moment when a strategy is tried, lights a spark of
preferences and choice into the learning experience. Adaptive learning fits
within the umbrella of personalized and customized learning and can occur
through high-tech and low-tech options which falls for Blended Learning.
2
demand for greater diversity of new skills for wading the development
The system must be able to train the minds of the educated to cope
with the change. Design a type of education that is positive and functional
to develop the desired cultures and conduct of citizens out of the emerging
are very active in class participation if they engage their lessons in using
stimulates their learning better. They are not against traditional style of
3
because no two students have the same learning needs. They can cater
that the pupils are enjoying and at the same time, they are learning. In this
way, pupil’s perception in learning will not be weary and vague rather it will
questions:
1. How comparable are the experimental and control group in terms of first
3. Is there a significant difference between the pre test scores of the two
5. Is there a significant difference between the post test scores of the two
groups?
6. Is there a significant difference between the pretest and post test scores
of each group?
groups?
school.
Parents. With this research, it is hoped that they will become more
learning process.
5
engage in the blended learning activities given to them. Hence, they can
need to use and apply blended learning into their classroom instructions.
Through this research, they will be able to realize the role of integration of
proposed measures were based solely on the results of the analysis of the
input data.
7
Chapter 2
the researcher gathered from the journal, foreign and local literature,
learning environment that has been around for centuries. On the other
remained largely separate because they have used different media and
only) environment.
century had a huge impact on the possibilities for learning in the distributed
we can certain that the trend toward blended learning systems will
9
increase. It may even become so ubiquitous that we will eventually drop the
word blended and just call it learning. Learning in the future, it is here to
approaches.
definitions, they are mostly just variations of a few common themes. The
original use of the phrase “blended learning” was often associated with
However, the term has evolved to encompass a much richer set of learning
that combines offline and online forms of learning where the online learning
usually means “over the internet or intranet” and offline learning that
with specific sequence like chapters in a textbook. On the other hand, most
learning into four models: rotational, flex, a la carte and enriched virtual. (1)
from one activity or location to mix digital teaching tools and mentored
their teacher of record and then are free to complete their remaining course
instruction.
targeted bursts of context, including the 'back story' or 'field truth,' the more
courses over entire online courses. Osguthorpe & Graham (2003) identified
Graham (2003) identified three reasons that one might choose to design
Pedagogical Richness
One of the most important reasons for blended are more effective
strategies used.
more mature learners with outside commitments such as works and family
environment yet do not want to sacrifice the social interaction and human
Cost-Effectiveness
delivery.
these are: (1) Best personal integration among participants, with the
dynamics; (3) Potential cost saving with the formation of groups, to allow a
whole class start and finish the course within the same period; (4) Improved
the public; (5) Ability to perform field work and visits to places of interest; (6)
Improved learning outcomes within specified time, with more diverse media
costs, with specified dates, can limit the access of individual students who
responsible for the content, but only the relationship with the student’s
educational system. One that dominates the content does not care and who
On the side of the students, the coarse teacher may have a distance
(online) and different teachers in the classroom (in some cases they use
want.
15
presented and who must learn the material.The teacher may be seen as
agent.
and presenting new information, using outlines, explaining the material, and
demonstrating solutions to the problems. Further, she said that they should
centered teaching style is the task – oriented style that assumes “teachers
students.”
and experts. Group discussion and practice can be engaging and add
come into prominence as national goal. Currently, more than 95% of public
However, knowledge how to best apply this technology to educate and train
has been unresolved issue for researchers for more than 50 years (see
recognition that technology has pervasive effects on our daily lives, and our
can give people different ways of working by means of giving them freedom
the activity theory and the social constructive learning theory (Bjarno,
only regard the blend between technological and traditional teaching but
also regards the matter of what to learn and what pedagogical method and
pedagogical thought devoted to the premise that all [students] are capable
have had direct experience with this form of course delivery. Students
indicate that a blended learning model provides them with greater time
flexibility and improved learning outcomes but that initially they encounter
issues around time management, taking greater responsibility for their own
course include a lack of time, support and resources for course redesign,
acquiring new teaching and technology skills, plus the risks associated with
1996; Lipscomb, 2003; Pye & Sullivan, 2001; Wellman & Flores, 2002;
Yang and Chen, 2002). The researchers found that “an increase in
into their instruction. Wellman and Flores found that, “Before this
action research period, all teachers reported that nearly 100% of their
blended learning effectiveness. It has again been noted that the success of
Shraim and Khlaif (2010) note in their research that 75 % of the students
internet applications and this may lead to failure in e-learning and blended
Related Studies
20
has the amount and quality of research examining the effects of technology
classes taught with CBI with outcomes in classes without CBI. He found
that students who received CBI scored higher and progressed faster over
to every changes that happen to learners. A type of learning that can put
the learners at the center of learning and creates a classroom for them that
quality, learner interactions, and Moodle with its tools and resources. The
findings from that study indicated that learner attitudes towards blended
knowledge construction.
outcomes and how the former are significant predictors of blended learning
effectiveness.
22
B. Conceptual Framework
4. Analysis of data
5. Creating the
proposed exemplar
lesson plan
was observed during the use of Traditional Learning and Blended Learning
C. Null Hypotheses
D. Definition of Terms
Chapter 3
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
instrumentation and data collection procedure, and the tools for data
analysis.
A. Research Design
performed.
B. Research Locale
The respondents of this study are the Grade V- Star and V- SPJ of
Doña Pilar C. Gonzaga School. Fifty-eight (58) who are currently enrolled in
D. Instrumentation
The researcher used one set of questionnaire for the pupils. The
both sections that who used the Traditional Learning method and Blended
26
E. Procedure
There were three stages which had been considered in gathering the
data needed. In the first stage, the researcher sought approval from the
this study. In the second stage, the researcher distributed the questionnaire
to the respondents. The last stage was the retrieval of the questionnaire,
the validity and reliability of data that was to be presented and analyzed,
the researcher made used of t-Test analysis using excel. The following
Percentage: This was used to identify the ratio between the students and
the total number of students in relation to their distribution during the pre-
test and post-test performance. The Formula for percentage is given below:
27
Where:
P = percentage
F = frequency
Standard deviation: This was used for several sets of values and means
Where:
28
t-test: This was used to compare two different set of values. This test
compares the mean of two samples. In this study, the t-test was employed
in comparing the means of the pre-test and post-test of the control and
gains of the two said groups. The t-test uses means and standard
given below:
Where:
29
Mean Percentage Scores (MPS): This indicates the ratio between the
number of correctly answered items in a test and the total number of items.
Where:
30
Chapter 4
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
study. The findings were presented according to the specific problems and
Table 1
t t at 0.05 n
value which is 1.18 suggests that the null hypothesis must be accepted
since it is lower than the tabular value of 2.00 at 0.05 degrees of freedom.
period.
Blended learning is such exciting and interesting that the pupils could
really engage with it. And in the other hand, traditional approach of
showed that the students enjoyed taking part in the blended learning
had the highest score. The professor condenses the vast study
are considered a useful teaching learning tool, it has its own pros and
Table 2
Experimental Control
Score Description Percentag
Frequency Frequency Percentage
e
29-35 Outstanding
Very
22-28
Satisfactory
15-21 Satisfactory 24 82.76 19 65.52
Fairly
8-14 5 17.24 10 32.48
satisfactory
Did not meet
0-7
Requirement
Total 29 100 % 29 100 %
Mean 16.52 15.45
the means of two groups which are 16.52 and 15.45 respectively.
model (Twigg,2003)
Table 3
t t at
0.05
Experimental 16.52 2.08 Not Accept
Control 15.44 2.13
1.93 2.00 Significant Ho
was found more effective than traditional teaching for teaching human
anatomy.
Table 4
Experimental Control
Score Description
Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage
29-35 Outstanding 15 51.72 2 6.9
Very
22-28 11 27.93 19 65.52
Satisfactory
15-21 Satisfactory 3 10.34 8 27.59
8-14
Did not meet
0-7
Requirement
Total 29 100 % 29 100 %
Mean 27.31 23.83
Post Test Performance of the Two Groups
percent belongs to very satisfactory and only 10.34 percent falls under
35
satisfactory. On the other hand, for the control group, 65.52 percent of
outstanding.
Table 5
t t at
0.05
Experimental 27.31 3.87 3.61 Significant Reject
Control 23.83 3.45
2.00 Ho
difference between the post test scores of the two groups in Araling
value is 3.61 and is higher than the tabular t-value of 2.00 at 0.05
Table 6
at 0.05
Experimental 19.58 2.05 Significant Reject Ho
Control 19.98 2.05 Significant Reject Ho
test scores of each group. The results of both groups were subjected
for the experimental group is 19.58 and is higher than the tabular
Table 7
Learning Gains of Two Groups of Respondents
90 and above 2 0
85 - 89 15 1
80 - 84 9 18
75 - 79 2 8
74 and below 1 2
Total 29 29
Mean 59.28 43.69
percent than from their pretest scores. While only 1 replicated the
Table 8
t t at 0.05
Experimental 59.28 Significant Reject
Control 43.69
3.81 2.01 Ho
two groups. The data was subjected to t-test and the computed t-
value is 3.81, which is higher than the tabular t-value of 2.01 at 0.05
Deal, 2002 ). This technique has also been used to stimulate children
Banghay Aralin
sa Araling Panlipunan V
I. Learning Objectives:
A. Preliminary Activities
1. Review
“Kilalanin mo”
2. Motivation
“Semantic Web”
B. Developmental Activities
1. Presentation
“Teks ko basahin mo”
2. Recalling of Concepts
4. Further Application
IV. Assessment
Basahing mabuti ang sumusunod na pahayag
tungkol sa pamamalakad ng mga prayle. Piliin at isulat
ang titik ng tamang sagot.
Banghay Aralin
sa Araling Panlipunan V
I. Learning Objectives:
A. Preliminary Activities
1. Review
2. Motivation
“Picture Analysis”
Ipakita sa mga mag-aaral ang larawan ng isang pari at
ipalarawan ito.
B. Developmental Activities
1. Presentation
2. Recalling of Concepts
4. Further Application
Batay sa Gawain 1, ano-ano ang mga tungkulin o
papel ng mga prayle sa ilalim ng Patronato Real?
Tandaan Natin:
IV. Assessment
Banghay Aralin
sa Araling Panlipunan V
I. Learning Objectives:
A. Preliminary Activities
3. Motivation
Taonong:
Brainstorming:
Pagpapalitan ng mga kaalaman tungkol sa aralin.
B. Developmental Activities
1. Presentation
Pagbasa ng Talata sa powerpoint
2. Recalling of Concepts
Pangkatang Gawain
Gabay na Tanong:
1.Bakit isinagawa ng Espanyol ang reduccion?
2. Ano ano ang natutunan ng mga Pilipino sa
pagkakaroon ng reduccion?
3.Paano nakatulong ang reduccion sa mga paring
misyonero?
4. Further Application
48
IV. Assessment
A. Remediation
Banghay Aralin
sa Araling Panlipunan V
49
I. Learning Objectives:
A. Preliminary Activities
1. Review
2. Motivation
Magpapanood ng video clip na nagpapakita ng
sistema ng pangongolekta ng tribute
B. Developmental Activities
1. Presentation
50
2. Recalling of Concepts
4. Further Application
Pangkatang Gawain:
IV. Assessment
Banghay Aralin
sa Araling Panlipunan V
I. Learning Objectives:
2. Motivation
Pagsusuri sa larawan
B. Developmental Activities
1. Presentation
•Ano ang nasa larawan?
•Ano ang masasabi niyo sa mga ito?
•Sino kaya sa palagay ninyo ang gumawa ng mga ito?
•May kabutihang dulot bas a atin ang mga gusaling ito?
•Dito ba sa ating lugar ay may ganito pa ring mga
gusali?
53
2. Recalling of Concepts
Pagbasa ng talata
4. Further Application
1. Iguhit ang mga bunga ng sapilitang paggawa
2. Pangkatang Gawain
-Pangkat 1-
Dula-dulaan tungkol sa kahalagahan ng
pagpapatupad ng sapilitang paggawa.
-Pangkat 2-
Jingle tungkol sa kahalagahan ng sapilitang
paggawa.
-Pangkat 3-
Slogan Making tungkol sa kahalagahan ng
sapilitang paggawa.
IV. Assessment
54
Chapter 5
variable.
55
A. Summary of Findings
was 16.52 while that of the control group was 15.45 with the
while the latter obtaining only 65.52 percent under the same
level.
of null hypothesis.
was 27.31 while that of the control group was 23.83 with the
null hypothesis.
57
was greater than the tabulated t-value of 2.05 at .05 level, led to
control group.
of null hypothesis.
B. Conclusions
C. Recommendations
recommended that:
and create activities suited for the pupils which will eventually
confidence;
6. Teachers should ensure that pupils are given intellectually
BIBLIOGRAPHY
A. Book Sources
statistics.
Gay, L. R. (1992). Educational research (4th Ed.). New York:
Merrill
Graham C. (2004). Blended Learning Systems: Definition,
Current Trends, And Future Directions. Handbook of
blended learning: Global Perspectives, local designs.
San Francisco, USA
Al Musawi A. (2011). Blended Learning. Journal of Turkish
Science Education, Volume 8, Issue 2, June 2011.
Turkey
Bishop J. L., Verleger M. (2013).The Flipped Classroom: A
Survey of the Research.American Society for
Engineering Education. USA
62
Tech & Learning: Ideas & Tools for Ed Tech Leaders, Oct.2015,
vol.36, no 3. Pg.42
Tech & Learning: Ideas and Tools for Ed Tech Leaders, Feb
2016, vol.36, no. 7, pg. 30&31
Tech & Learning; Ideas and Tools for Ed Tech Leaders, July
2015, vol. 35, no. 12, pg. 10
Impact of Blended Learning: Tech & Learning: Ideas & Tools for
Ed Tech
Leaders, Jan. 2016, Vol.36, no. 5, pg. 8
Dr. Roland Birbal1, Dr. Mala Ramdass2 & Mr. Cyril Harripaul3
Journal of Education and Human Development June
2018, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 9-26
B. Internet
https://cemast.illinoisstate.edu/downloads/hsrs/types_of_research.pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/201382131_Experimental_R
esearch_Methods
https://cemast.illinoisstate.edu/downloads/hsrs/types_of_research.pdf
https://formulas.tutorvista.com/math/t-test-formula.html
https://explorable.com/experimental-research
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ747810
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1168949.pdf
http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/19647/12/12_chapte
r2.pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273734050 STUDENTS%27
ATTITUDES_AND_SATISFACTION_TOWARDS_BLENDED_LEARNI
NG_IN_THE_HEALTH_SCIENCES
a. Ayuntamiento c. Reconquitas
b. Encomienda d. Reduccion
18. Ang mga lugar kung saan sama-samang naninirahan ang mga tao
sa pamamahala ng isang pari. Ano ang hinuha natin sa pahayag?
33. Ipinakilala din ng mga Espanyol ang mga bagong mga pananim
mula sa Europa at Mexico. Ano ang ipinapahiwatig dito?
35. Hindi naging madali ang naging karanasan ng mga ninuno natin
sa mga prayle. Sa pangkalahatan, ano ang naging reaksyon ng
mga Pilipino sa naging karanasan nila sa mga Espanyol?
CURRICULUM VITAE
CANARY B. VIERNES
153 Saniboy St. Hulo, Mandaluyong City
1550
canary.viernes@depedmandaluyong.org
09126800042
Educational Background
Graduate Studies:
Master of Arts in Education
Major in Educational Administration
Philippine Christian University Manila
2019
Tertiary:
Mariano Marcos State University
College of Teacher Education
Bachelor of Elementary Education
2015
Secondary:
Ilocos Norte National High School
Laoag City
2011
Elementary:
76
Working Experiences
Character References
Maritess S. Patacsil
Master Teacher I
Doññ a Pilar C. Gonzaga Elementary School